Author Topic: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?  (Read 2682 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline immortalz

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 12
Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« on: Fri, 10 August 2012, 06:44:52 »
Is there any reason for me to consider ever buying a filco over a CM quickfire rapid that is half the price?  I know some people hate the branding but you save 50-70$ by getting the same keyboard with different branding.  Then you can use that extra money to buy new keycaps or something. 

Also I know this has been asked a lot before but what do you guys think is better switches for gaming, reds or browns?  Leaning towards the reds at the moment but would also like to hear what you all think.  The red CM quickfire also looks the best =)

Offline longweight

  • philanthropist
  • Posts: 2180
  • Location: London, UK
  • AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
    • www.key-bored.net
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #1 on: Fri, 10 August 2012, 07:04:44 »
Not really, I couldn't live with the branding on the board and you won't be able to get an aluminium case for it if that might be something that you want to do in the future.

Offline poxeclipse

  • Posts: 281
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • Hit me with music ... yes, me friend
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #2 on: Fri, 10 August 2012, 07:20:01 »
No difference, indeed. If you hate the logo on the CM case, you can wrap the case in vinyl and it looks nice.

Offline derb2k2

  • Posts: 19
  • Location: Miami,Fl
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #3 on: Fri, 10 August 2012, 08:07:38 »
regarding what switch is best for gaming:

http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=33573.0

Offline immortalz

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 12
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #4 on: Fri, 10 August 2012, 23:24:06 »
regarding what switch is best for gaming:

http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=33573.0

I read through that thread already, I'm just looking for some more input if anyone has any. Thanks for the link though.


Offline Harlequin

  • Posts: 86
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #5 on: Fri, 10 August 2012, 23:33:47 »
well, ppl say filco majestouch 2's build quality is the best but filco is truly over priced imo.
Great kb but not a good value kb. Quickfire is def better value, i would say one of the best value kbs out there now.
About the gaming switch, i would say depends on game genres.

Personally i would use Red, and Black for FPS.
Blue and Brown for RTS.
Red, Brown for MMO.

Red is designed for gaming but i srsly dunno why. It just has low activation force that's it.
Nothing special for gaming imo.

So in conclusion,

If you have a lot of money, just go for filco. It might be easier to sell it to ppl later than quickfire.

Except this, just go for quickfire and if it's your first mech kb, just go for quickfire too.


DK Saver Winkeyless | Leopold FC700R | Ducky DK9087 Shine 2

Offline immortalz

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 12
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #6 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 00:55:26 »
well, ppl say filco majestouch 2's build quality is the best but filco is truly over priced imo.
Great kb but not a good value kb. Quickfire is def better value, i would say one of the best value kbs out there now.
About the gaming switch, i would say depends on game genres.

Personally i would use Red, and Black for FPS.
Blue and Brown for RTS.
Red, Brown for MMO.

Red is designed for gaming but i srsly dunno why. It just has low activation force that's it.
Nothing special for gaming imo.

So in conclusion,

If you have a lot of money, just go for filco. It might be easier to sell it to ppl later than quickfire.

Except this, just go for quickfire and if it's your first mech kb, just go for quickfire too.

I never used reds only blues and blacks but I assume red is considered the best because low activation force = faster input meaning you will be faster in your games.  Can someone confirm this?




Offline Hyde

  • Posts: 1214
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • White Tofu Extraordinaire
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #7 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 01:01:43 »
If you're getting tenkeyless, I'd go for CM Storm QuickFire Rapid.  I only bought a Filco because I need a full size MX Red keyboard, and CM Storm doesn't have that yet.  But yes it's true with what people said, CM Storm is the best bang for the buck.

As for the switch, Red is better for gaming hands down due to the fact that it's super light and no bump (linear) which is good if you want to spam the keys fast.  As for typing, I'd give it a tie between brown and red for now :P

Matias Quiet Pro - Dampened ALPS  |  Beige Filco Ninja 104 - MX Red  |  Das Keyboard - MX Brown
Razer Naga  |  CM Storm Xornet  |  Artisan Hien  |  Artisan Hayate  |  Artisan Shiden  |  Razer Goliathus Control

Offline Harlequin

  • Posts: 86
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #8 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 03:59:50 »
If you're getting tenkeyless, I'd go for CM Storm QuickFire Rapid.  I only bought a Filco because I need a full size MX Red keyboard, and CM Storm doesn't have that yet.  But yes it's true with what people said, CM Storm is the best bang for the buck.

As for the switch, Red is better for gaming hands down due to the fact that it's super light and no bump (linear) which is good if you want to spam the keys fast.  As for typing, I'd give it a tie between brown and red for now :P

I thought they had full size kbs for quite long.

http://www.cmstorm.com/en/products/keyboards/quickfirepro/
http://www.cmstorm.com/en/products/keyboards/Trigger/


DK Saver Winkeyless | Leopold FC700R | Ducky DK9087 Shine 2

Offline Djuzuh

  • Posts: 1748
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #9 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 04:31:49 »
If you're getting tenkeyless, I'd go for CM Storm QuickFire Rapid.  I only bought a Filco because I need a full size MX Red keyboard, and CM Storm doesn't have that yet.  But yes it's true with what people said, CM Storm is the best bang for the buck.

As for the switch, Red is better for gaming hands down due to the fact that it's super light and no bump (linear) which is good if you want to spam the keys fast.  As for typing, I'd give it a tie between brown and red for now :P

I thought they had full size kbs for quite long.

http://www.cmstorm.com/en/products/keyboards/quickfirepro/
http://www.cmstorm.com/en/products/keyboards/Trigger/

I believe some of those models aren't made by costar. So build quality is not the same for all CM products.

Offline stingrae

  • Posts: 271
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #10 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 11:52:59 »
http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=33240.msg625590#msg625590

Not sure whether Carter is right but it's a post that got less interest than I thought it would (mind you with the hacking period it was to be expected)...Sure is interesting.

On Filco, nothing wrong with cm storm but something about filco makes me still want one...so tempted :(...
Cm Storm Quickfire Rapid - Noppoo Choc MiniFilco Ninja Tenkeyless (Soon...)

Offline thegunner100

  • Posts: 1498
  • Location: NYC
  • (╯'□')╯︵</3 ノ( '-'ノ)
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #11 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 11:58:43 »
Just get the quickfire and save yourself some money for another keyboard, keycaps, or whatever you like to spend your money on :D

They both have pretty much the same build quality, but the quickfire uses a detachable USB cable whereas the filco doesn't. The quickfire logos suck, but its not like you're constantly staring at the keyboard as you're typing anyways.

Red vs browns, it'll vary between eveeyone. With the money you're saving by buying the quickfire, why not buy both the red and brown versions?
R.I.Pster ~ CM QF Rapidx2 ~ REALFORCE 87uw 45/55g ~ Logitech G5v2 ~ Wacom Bamboo CTH-460

Beyerdynamic T70 Sennheiser HD600 ~ Vsonic GR07 ~ Ultimate Ears In-ear Reference Monitors ~ Audioengine A2
Peachtree Dac*it ~ Little Dot MK IV SE ~ Schiit Asgard 2 ~ Headstage Arrow 4g

Offline MarkPharaoh

  • Posts: 268
  • Location: San Francisco
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #12 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 12:34:34 »
I own both a CM Storm Rapid and a FILCO MJ2 and it's obvious that the FILCO is a more solid board. So, if money was no issue then it's no contest. But, is the FILCO worth double the price of the Rapid, or more? Ehhhhh, for me it is, for many others it wouldn't be. I just notice too big of a difference when I'm slamming on my CM board like a mad man to really consider it over a FILCO.

I think that if you never use a FILCO, the Rapid will be great. But if you end up buying both like I did, the differences may be enough for you to never want to use the Rapid as your main board.

Edit: removed false info because I'm dumb :-)
« Last Edit: Sat, 11 August 2012, 12:52:31 by MarkPharaoh »
Current: HHKB Pro 2, IBM Model M 1391401 RETIRED: RF 87u 55g AE, FILCO MJ2, CM Storm QFR, Noppoo Choc Mini, Leopold FC200R, Vortex Poker

Offline alaricljs

  • I be WOT'ing all day...
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 4851
  • Location: NE US
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #13 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 12:39:59 »
I own both a CM Storm Rapid and a FILCO MJ2 and it's obvious that the FILCO is a more solid board. FILCO uses costar stabilizers in their boards and I notice the difference.

Uh what?  Filco and CM Storm Quickfire both use Costar stabilizers and are both manufactured through Costar.
Filco w/ Imsto thick PBT
Ducky 1087XM PCB+Plate, w/ Matias "Quiet Click" spring-swapped w/ XM Greens

Offline MarkPharaoh

  • Posts: 268
  • Location: San Francisco
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #14 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 12:51:44 »
Are they? My mistake, I'll edit. Am I thinking of my Noppoo? That's what I get from browsing In bed before coffee. :-)
Current: HHKB Pro 2, IBM Model M 1391401 RETIRED: RF 87u 55g AE, FILCO MJ2, CM Storm QFR, Noppoo Choc Mini, Leopold FC200R, Vortex Poker

Online jdcarpe

  • ssk.ℜ
  • Posts: 4322
  • Location: Odessa, TX
  • Live long, and prosper.
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #15 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 12:56:00 »
Save yourself $70 and buy the Filco. If you get a CM Storm QuickFire Rapid, you will be happy with it, for a while. But you will always wonder what that Filco is like, and is it better than your QFR. You will then end up buying a Filco, anyway, and even though they feel the same, you will always give the edge to the Filco. Since it costs more, it must be better, right?

For full disclosure, I own 3 Filco TKLs, and have never owned or used a CM Storm QuickFire Rapid. :D
옥 잉어

CLICK TO SEE
More

"When I was a kid, I used to take things apart and never put them back together."
KMAC Mini :: KMAC Pad :: LZ-S :: Phantom :: GH60 Prototype :: TypeNow Solid

Projects GH60 Project :: GHpad Project :: Keyboard Prototyping

GH60 Group Buy

Online rknize

  • Administrator
  • Posts: 1712
  • Location: Chicago
    • metaruss
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #16 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 13:14:31 »
I have a Filco, CM Storm, and a Leopold tenkeyless.  The CM Storm is about 90% of the Filco for about half the price.  Both are very solid boards.  The Leo is solid too, but the difference is more noticeable and I think I know why.

It's all about what is more important to you.  If you end up being a collector, you'll end up with a Filco regardless.  :)  As others have said, the CM Storm is the best bang for your buck by far.  The branding on the case is not bad at all once you replace those keys.

I've had them all apart.  Both the Filco and the CM Storm support the switches by the plate, which is supported directly by the base.  The switch/plate/PCB assembly is almost exactly the same and they both use Costar stabilizers.  The Leopold supports the plate via the PCB, which is then supported by the base.  The key differences between the Filco and the CM Storm are:

- The Filco has two screws holding the plate down to the base and the base has some extra webbing on the Filco.  The plate is then sandwiched between the two halves on both, but the CM Storm lacks the extra screws.

- The Filco has a thicker, double-sided PCB.  The CM Storm is a bit thinner and is single-sided.  Both look to be FR4, but the Filco may be a higher grade.

The Leopold has a lighter and thinner PCB material (looks FR3 to me).  This coupled with the way the PCB has to support the plate and switches is the reason for the difference in typing feel.  Obviously, the Cherry stabilizers are also a factor.
Russ    
More
B/S: Model M 1391401, 60G3571 | M13 | SSK 1391472, 1397681 | Model F XT, AT, 122 | Unicomp Classic Trackball, EnduraPro | Ergo-clear: Filco MJ2 TKL | Ergo-white: KBC Poker | Vintage black: Phantom v1 | Rosewill | Noppo Choc Mini | G80-1819 | CM Storm QFR | WASD V1 | KBC Race

Offline thegunner100

  • Posts: 1498
  • Location: NYC
  • (╯'□')╯︵</3 ノ( '-'ノ)
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #17 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 13:30:56 »
Screw it, just get a topre and be done with your keyboard journey :P
R.I.Pster ~ CM QF Rapidx2 ~ REALFORCE 87uw 45/55g ~ Logitech G5v2 ~ Wacom Bamboo CTH-460

Beyerdynamic T70 Sennheiser HD600 ~ Vsonic GR07 ~ Ultimate Ears In-ear Reference Monitors ~ Audioengine A2
Peachtree Dac*it ~ Little Dot MK IV SE ~ Schiit Asgard 2 ~ Headstage Arrow 4g

Offline MarkPharaoh

  • Posts: 268
  • Location: San Francisco
Re: Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #18 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 15:15:58 »
Screw it, just get a topre and be done with your keyboard journey :P

I like where your head is at :-) Just bought MMBs, can't wait until I get it.
Current: HHKB Pro 2, IBM Model M 1391401 RETIRED: RF 87u 55g AE, FILCO MJ2, CM Storm QFR, Noppoo Choc Mini, Leopold FC200R, Vortex Poker

Offline Xerobasix

  • Posts: 65
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #19 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 15:29:20 »
FWIW I have a CM Storm and love it (browns feel awesome for gaming / typing and I play FPS mostly)... but I'm going to be buying a Filco (with reds) soon for the exact reason mentioned by jdcarpe.  I must know if I'm missing something.  And, I want a case that says "Filco".
CM Quickfire Rapid - Brown | Blue | Red

Offline immortalz

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 12
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #20 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 18:58:41 »
I had a CM quickfire rapid in blues before guys but I hated the switch so much that I got rid of it.  I got it right when it came out.  For some reason my hands got really tired from gaming on it, maybe it was because I was bottoming out every key? 

For the people that have the filco mj2 and the CM can you guys compare the size and width of the keyboard?  I am just curious how much exactly they are alike =p.  Pictures will be appreciated

Offline alaricljs

  • I be WOT'ing all day...
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 4851
  • Location: NE US
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #21 on: Sat, 11 August 2012, 20:23:16 »
The casing outside dimensions are identical within manufacturing tolerances and whatever changes that CM Storm coating makes.
Filco w/ Imsto thick PBT
Ducky 1087XM PCB+Plate, w/ Matias "Quiet Click" spring-swapped w/ XM Greens

Offline False_Dmitry_II

  • Posts: 1161
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #22 on: Sun, 12 August 2012, 04:28:48 »
If the problem is bottoming out on everything, getting different switches that require less force will just make that worse, which would be both reds and browns.

So you'll either have to deal with that fact and stick with cherry, maybe get blacks or something. Otherwise you'll have to get a non-cherry something. There aren't very many things which are currently being made that aren't.

Sticking to the original question only, I see no reason to blow that much more money just to get a filco over something that still has a metal backplate and uses the same switches.

Offline DasHHKBProM

  • Posts: 73
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #23 on: Tue, 04 September 2012, 14:54:49 »
.
« Last Edit: Fri, 22 February 2013, 00:07:16 by DasHHKBProM »

Offline alaricljs

  • I be WOT'ing all day...
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 4851
  • Location: NE US
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #24 on: Tue, 04 September 2012, 15:01:23 »
Now you have me wondering which component is responsible for the weight difference.  The Filco cable should be somewhat offset by the 3rd PCB w/ USB connector inside the CM, any idea how much of the cable was suspended from the Filco?  I'd bet that without keycaps and without the cable/connector board the 2 would be near identical.
Filco w/ Imsto thick PBT
Ducky 1087XM PCB+Plate, w/ Matias "Quiet Click" spring-swapped w/ XM Greens

Offline DasHHKBProM

  • Posts: 73
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #25 on: Tue, 04 September 2012, 15:03:27 »
i dropped the other 2 images so page loads faster

I did think about the cable. majority of the cable was resting on the glass maybe 4 inches of cable from KB

Offline DasHHKBProM

  • Posts: 73
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #26 on: Tue, 04 September 2012, 15:06:20 »
I figure the 4 inch of cable or so included in the weight of filco will account for the full usb connecter in the CM

Offline alaricljs

  • I be WOT'ing all day...
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 4851
  • Location: NE US
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #27 on: Tue, 04 September 2012, 15:07:25 »
Oh wait... those blues have that extra slider in every switch.  87 switches, .25-.5 g per slider?  Then again the CM is also single layer PCB. The new Filco is dual, so more copper there.
« Last Edit: Tue, 04 September 2012, 15:09:16 by alaricljs »
Filco w/ Imsto thick PBT
Ducky 1087XM PCB+Plate, w/ Matias "Quiet Click" spring-swapped w/ XM Greens

Offline DasHHKBProM

  • Posts: 73
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #28 on: Tue, 04 September 2012, 15:10:32 »
they are both rohs which if im not mistakes no PB(lead) in product including solder? i could be wrong tho about that 

Online rknize

  • Administrator
  • Posts: 1712
  • Location: Chicago
    • metaruss
Re: Any reason to get a filco over CM quickfire rapid?
« Reply #29 on: Tue, 04 September 2012, 16:21:22 »
The Filco PCB is thicker.  I didn't measure them.  Glass is heavy.
Russ    
More
B/S: Model M 1391401, 60G3571 | M13 | SSK 1391472, 1397681 | Model F XT, AT, 122 | Unicomp Classic Trackball, EnduraPro | Ergo-clear: Filco MJ2 TKL | Ergo-white: KBC Poker | Vintage black: Phantom v1 | Rosewill | Noppo Choc Mini | G80-1819 | CM Storm QFR | WASD V1 | KBC Race