Author Topic: My Logicool MX518 arrived (Read 14809 times)

TheSoulhunter · « **on:** Thu, 17 September 2009, 14:50:24 »

Finally...

ch_123 · « **Reply #1 on:** Thu, 17 September 2009, 15:39:32 »

That's one smart looking mouse, how much did it cost you?

TheSoulhunter · « **Reply #2 on:** Thu, 17 September 2009, 15:45:34 »

Quote from: ch_123;118847

That's one smart looking mouse, how much did it cost you?

4120 Yen / 31 Euros / 45 USD
Shipping not included...

TheSoulhunter · « **Reply #3 on:** Thu, 17 September 2009, 15:48:05 »

Quote from: webwit;118850

Logicool? Fail.

Probably Logitech simply didn't sound Cool enough to Japanese folks...

msiegel · « **Reply #4 on:** Thu, 17 September 2009, 15:49:25 »

looks familiar, but the branding is illogicool

ch_123 · « **Reply #5 on:** Thu, 17 September 2009, 15:50:06 »

There was already a company called Logitech in Japan when the Logitech we know and love set up shop. So they became Logicool.

itlnstln · « **Reply #6 on:** Thu, 17 September 2009, 16:04:54 »

Quote from: webwit;118857

The people who came up with that will have to shovel **** in hell with the people who came up with "iRocks" for eternity.

This. Logitech - sounds like a reasonable hardware company name. Logicool - sounds like some off-brand bullsh*t you find at flea markets.

I like to get my i-Rocks off to some i-Porn.

Filco? That sounds like the brand of TV my great-grandfather used to own.

Some of these tech companies have weird names.

ch_123 · « **Reply #7 on:** Thu, 17 September 2009, 16:23:43 »

Quote from: webwit;118857

The people who came up with that will have to shovel **** in hell with the people who came up with "iRocks" for eternity.

I was thinking how "iRocks"-ish it sounds. Either way, I agree, it's a rather stupid name.

Also, how come us 'gaijin' ended up with a variant that lookes like it had a jackhammer taken to it?

Hofy · « **Reply #8 on:** Thu, 17 September 2009, 17:23:16 »

I just wish I could get a couple more G3 mice cheap.

AndrewZorn · « **Reply #9 on:** Fri, 18 September 2009, 09:47:16 »

Quote from: ch_123;118868

I was thinking how "iRocks"-ish it sounds. Either way, I agree, it's a rather stupid name.

Also, how come us 'gaijin' ended up with a variant that lookes like it had a jackhammer taken to it?

Show Image

i thought it was a 1st gen/2nd gen thing, but it doesnt appear so, but i know ive seen the gray version in the US.

i have the hammer version. didint think these still sold for as much as i paid for it years ago. might have to sell it since i now own a g9.

AndrewZorn · « **Reply #10 on:** Fri, 18 September 2009, 12:04:17 »

my logo looks like that but theres not really a reason for the gashes...

but what do you mean worn out? buy new feet? i actually did then got the g9 right after anyway.

D-EJ915 · « **Reply #11 on:** Fri, 18 September 2009, 12:56:34 »

that logo's not bad at all lol, you can still read the logo!

and an optical 3-button http://www.logicool.co.jp/index.cfm/mice_pointers/mice/devices/3376&cl=jp,ja

microsoft windows · « **Reply #12 on:** Fri, 18 September 2009, 19:27:12 »

Your Logicool was a dud?

Hak Foo · « **Reply #13 on:** Fri, 18 September 2009, 21:35:54 »

Were the buttons on the 518's side clicky?

I bought a G5 recently expecting the clicky side buttons of the co-worker's G7. Sadly, they don't click at all, compared with the MX400 I had been riding. I find they actually boost productivity for a web developer/.

D-EJ915 · « **Reply #14 on:** Fri, 18 September 2009, 21:43:07 »

button on my G5 clicks but it's the 1-button model

AndrewZorn · « **Reply #15 on:** Fri, 18 September 2009, 21:43:09 »

they are clicky feel but not [very] noisy clicky

exousia · « **Reply #16 on:** Fri, 13 November 2009, 14:35:45 »

The texture on the Logicool looks nice. I wonder how well it wicks away sweat compared to the regular Logitech 518..

lmnop · « **Reply #17 on:** Fri, 13 November 2009, 20:37:21 »

the Logitech G3 (MX-518) uses the Avago 3080 optical sensor and the Logitech MX-518 Rev 2 uses the Avago 3080E optical sensor they both have the same performance but the Logitech MX-518 Rev 2 has a data saturation problem.

the graphs above show when Setpoint is installed there is going to be data saturation no matter what value the resolution is set to. to minimize this it is recommended not to install Setpoint, overclock the usb port and set the resolution to a lower value than 1800 CPI because at 1800 CPI it is way too erratic and the performance loss brings it down to a OS MLT 04 optical sensor (Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer 3.0).

Logitech MX-518 Rev 2 owners shouldn't have a problem with this information since the Setpoint drivers can be difficult to install and if you manage to get them installed they are next to useless.

please don't shoot the messenger!

AndrewZorn · « **Reply #18 on:** Sat, 14 November 2009, 10:39:45 »

basically setpoint lowers the maximum movement distance (in a set amount of time) (ie, physical speed) before it starts to drop data
which is really ironic
its nice that all functions of my g9 work without setpoint, and it has onboard memory for the options so i dont even need setpoint for custom DPI settings

graph reminded me of one of these

AndrewZorn · « **Reply #19 on:** Sat, 14 November 2009, 10:42:17 »

i wish it did
that would have prevented me from having to install setpoint even ONCE

lmnop · « **Reply #20 on:** Sat, 14 November 2009, 21:09:25 »

doesn't the Logitech MX-518 Rev 2 use Omron Microswitches?

lmnop · « **Reply #21 on:** Sun, 15 November 2009, 00:28:54 »

Quote from: ripster;132376

Oooooo pretty graph.

Show Image

Have no idea what you're talking about. My kid loves his MX-518. [AMF]Ripster.

Yeah, he has that POS Setpoint installed too because I'm too lazy to delete it.

your son is probably too young but did you ever play Quake 1 or 2?

News:

Author Topic: My Logicool MX518 arrived (Read 14809 times)