would you consider making it fullsized and a completely different layout?
jk good luck with it!
HEWE WE GO BOYS TMO50 wayout is the gweatest thing evew wet me teww you siw. Fiwst of aww cwass ic inspiwations on the HHKB bwockew stywe IT awso has the ; and ‘ kjeys unwess othew competitows in the 40% space which I find compwetewy unwepwaceabwe in wayews it awso has extwa keys fow macwos (wead: awtisans- I absowutewy wuv the wayout whewe you have nyumbews/ owo @#$%^ that wepwace qwewty it means i can type fow wong pewiods of time wihtout twisting my hands at aww wheweas on a nyowmaw boawd you ahve to twist youw wwists sometimes to type fow me I just have to howd down weft space and cwick asdf to get to nyumbews It’s awso just gowgeous IMO Anyo quawity is good, engwaving is good, I wike how he made it so you can buy a 40% sized boawd/wayout but nyot nyeed to buy 40% sized modifiews fow youw keyboawd so you can use base kits and uh yeah that’s it That’s why TMO50 is my evewy day boawd I witewawwy am typing on it wight nyow and have used it evewy singwe day at wowk fow the wast 4 months 0 inftention to evew stop.
:thumb: :thumb:
Also, does V2 also drop the little LED cluster?
Because the cap facing renders were kinda hidden away in a link I did not notice. After I saw them I think I would really prefer v1 layout over the 60% cap compatibility even at the cost of compatibility.I think v1 looks more symmetric too
Definitely interested!+1
+1 for 100 EU units.
Please bring the LED cluster back.
It's simply just so beautiful with it on the board.
Just a thought.Now that you mention it. I think it would look really nice! +1
If youre going to offer a full space option, should it not be 1.5 - 7 - 1.5 to make it nice and symmetrical?
Obviously if someone is using full space, they don't care as much about functionality.
Just a thought. Id prefer it that way personally.
Just a thought.
If youre going to offer a full space option, should it not be 1.5 - 7 - 1.5 to make it nice and symmetrical?
Obviously if someone is using full space, they don't care as much about functionality.
Just a thought. Id prefer it that way personally.
So hard to choose a color... gonna end up with one of the polycarb versions..
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
So, just a question (not asking you to change the board):
What about a second column on the right side?
I personally think it would look better that way.
But maybe people are just not that into symmetry like me?
Crappy Photoshop hack-job below with an R1 pic.
Guess I will have to hope for the v3 to get those indicator LEDs again, still one of my favorite smaller boards in terms of looks and usability though. You won't need much luck with the GB, but cheers on another round of a great board.
Do I see it right that the 22 underglow LEDs are only usable with the polycarbonate version? All other versions are fully closed aluminum cases right?
+1 for 100 units for EU and 2.75-2.25u split space
I'd also rather see black instead of grey agan for colors on this run.
Guess I will have to hope for the v3 to get those indicator LEDs again, still one of my favorite smaller boards in terms of looks and usability though. You won't need much luck with the GB, but cheers on another round of a great board.Me too, finger crossed for those leds
I really prefer the v1 variant that had the shorter 0.5u width. That small amount made that highly admired extra compact fit that comes in par with a regular 60%. Keycaps were very approachable with most gmk 40s kit. The most reluctant key was an R3 1.25 ctrl. Moulds for it exist but not enough usage/demand, a few gmk kits had it, but that was the only tiny thing about it that's tedious.
The four LEDs were also a nice touch for the v1, it's a neat detail similar to the C70. If you make a v3, I'd really love to see those two details added back.
Are there any thoughts on releasing a handful of units in v1 alongside this IC or as a separate?
I really prefer the v1 variant that had the shorter 0.5u width. That small amount made that highly admired extra compact fit that comes in par with a regular 60%. Keycaps were very approachable with most gmk 40s kit. The most reluctant key was an R3 1.25 ctrl. Moulds for it exist but not enough usage/demand, a few gmk kits had it, but that was the only tiny thing about it that's tedious.
The four LEDs were also a nice touch for the v1, it's a neat detail similar to the C70. If you make a v3, I'd really love to see those two details added back.
Are there any thoughts on releasing a handful of units in v1 alongside this IC or as a separate?
I really prefer the v1 variant that had the shorter 0.5u width. That small amount made that highly admired extra compact fit that comes in par with a regular 60%. Keycaps were very approachable with most gmk 40s kit. The most reluctant key was an R3 1.25 ctrl. Moulds for it exist but not enough usage/demand, a few gmk kits had it, but that was the only tiny thing about it that's tedious.
The four LEDs were also a nice touch for the v1, it's a neat detail similar to the C70. If you make a v3, I'd really love to see those two details added back.
Are there any thoughts on releasing a handful of units in v1 alongside this IC or as a separate?
omg yaaaas so glad more of this board are being produced!
Is there going to be any compatibility with R1 TMOs? I could go for a PC or e-white case to swap out on my current one...
Would PC version include a brass weight? I think I'd like a board without it so I can put a nice sticker back there.
If PC comes with a weight, I'll just go aluminum.
Would PC version include a brass weight? I think I'd like a board without it so I can put a nice sticker back there.Yes it does come with weight, or else it would be super light
If PC comes with a weight, I'll just go aluminum.
I really prefer the v1 variant that had the shorter 0.5u width. That small amount made that highly admired extra compact fit that comes in par with a regular 60%. Keycaps were very approachable with most gmk 40s kit. The most reluctant key was an R3 1.25 ctrl. Moulds for it exist but not enough usage/demand, a few gmk kits had it, but that was the only tiny thing about it that's tedious.
The four LEDs were also a nice touch for the v1, it's a neat detail similar to the C70. If you make a v3, I'd really love to see those two details added back.
Are there any thoughts on releasing a handful of units in v1 alongside this IC or as a separate?
I get you but this is the design decision I took. Sorry. :D Unfortunately V1 won't be run during V2 GB as that seems a bit wrong.omg yaaaas so glad more of this board are being produced!
Is there going to be any compatibility with R1 TMOs? I could go for a PC or e-white case to swap out on my current one...
No, TMO50 & TMOv2 isn't compatible in any way. Size, case design and PCB are all different.
That's a shame! Has there been a design change to allow PC cases to be produced without warping this time around? I thought I remembered it wasn't possible last to get them straight and that's why only PC bottoms were offered.
Damn...that transparent red....
Never knew I wanted a kb with that until now :eek:
This is a sexy 50%, and doesn't sacrifice the [];' keys I use for programming. I'm going to try and set some money aside for this, and hope I get in.
Damn...that transparent red....
Never knew I wanted a kb with that until now :eek:
Haha, I actually thought about doing a "Ruby Red" aluminium prototype just as the one that'll be available in the GB but when I heard there's a coloured PC option I knew that it'll be beautiful & special!
Just filled out a form, thank you for considering an Asia/Oceania proxy!Where is the form? I couldn't find it, is the IC already completed?
Definitely interested in purchasing a TMO, especially since missing out on the first run.
Just filled out a form, thank you for considering an Asia/Oceania proxy!Where is the form? I couldn't find it, is the IC already completed?
Definitely interested in purchasing a TMO, especially since missing out on the first run.
UPDATE:
I've seen some people from Asia asking about a proxy and I'm currently working on it! I'm still gathering some statistics for the demand so if you're from Asia or Oceania please fill out this form (https://forms.gle/aeiCAu5oSyvFBZN99)!
Thank youJust filled out a form, thank you for considering an Asia/Oceania proxy!Where is the form? I couldn't find it, is the IC already completed?
Definitely interested in purchasing a TMO, especially since missing out on the first run.
The Asia/Oceania Proxy form is a couple of replies above:UPDATE:
I've seen some people from Asia asking about a proxy and I'm currently working on it! I'm still gathering some statistics for the demand so if you're from Asia or Oceania please fill out this form (https://forms.gle/aeiCAu5oSyvFBZN99)!
If the Oceania proxy gets the go ahead, would we get our own set of units or would we be taking some of the other regions units?
I'm honestly just happy that we would get our own units, thanks for the considerationIf the Oceania proxy gets the go ahead, would we get our own set of units or would we be taking some of the other regions units?
It would mean your own set of units but they're no proxy yet.
Writing GB thread draft tonight! Keep an eye out here as I will try and get it out tomorrow so it's exactly one week before November 2nd!
Have you already thought about your builds? :cool: