geekhack

geekhack Community => Off Topic => Topic started by: azhdar on Tue, 08 September 2015, 09:39:56

Title: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: azhdar on Tue, 08 September 2015, 09:39:56
I mean common ... The dot thing wasn't bad enough?

https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=22007

https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=9142
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: nubbinator on Tue, 08 September 2015, 09:43:37
Some quality ****posting there.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: cwils0n on Tue, 08 September 2015, 09:49:38
I know, it's ridiculously annoying. 

I'm sure they will reply here with something substantive and not this bull****. /s

 :eek:  :eek:  :eek:  :eek:

ಠ_ಠ
ಠ_ಠ
ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Air tree on Tue, 08 September 2015, 09:55:42
I'm about to go ****ing mad if I see another dot from moose. It's one of those tiny things that make me want to gouge out my eyeballs...
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: beehatch on Tue, 08 September 2015, 10:16:03
;_;
Title: .
Post by: esoomenona on Tue, 08 September 2015, 10:17:43
.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: absyrd on Tue, 08 September 2015, 10:26:02
And he got the exact reaction he wanted. Sorry OP.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Fire Brand on Tue, 08 September 2015, 10:29:13
Yup kinda feel like they need banning or timing out on the whole posting, not sure why both are doing it though
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: absyrd on Tue, 08 September 2015, 10:49:58
Yup kinda feel like they need banning or timing out on the whole posting, not sure why both are doing it though

Because they get bored and have trouble expressing themselves. And they like testing the members and mod reaction. Kids playing with matches is all, except this is hurting no one.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: azhdar on Tue, 08 September 2015, 10:57:50
They can open a off topic thread and spam with whatever they want instead of **** posting on multiples threads.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Tue, 08 September 2015, 11:04:17
Bunch of whiny little *****es here

ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Air tree on Tue, 08 September 2015, 11:05:13
Yup kinda feel like they need banning or timing out on the whole posting, not sure why both are doing it though
except this is hurting no one.
Wrong, this is hurting my sanity. ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Fire Brand on Tue, 08 September 2015, 11:14:57
Yup kinda feel like they need banning or timing out on the whole posting, not sure why both are doing it though

Because they get bored and have trouble expressing themselves. And they like testing the members and mod reaction. Kids playing with matches is all, except this is hurting no one.
Not really not at all it makes clutter and posting threads in places that shouldn't really be put there, such as the massdrop one makes more work for the mods when they have to move it, also as much as I find it amusing it's kind of annoying seeing a million of those faces getting posted in every thread, and it's defiantly not about them not being able to express them selves have you heard them when they play games, just what happened to demik last week for a good solid month he was actually be nice and helpful to people and saying hello to them.

I want that demik back not this one, I want kind and helpful demik back!
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Tue, 08 September 2015, 11:26:14
NOTHING TO SEE HERE. PLEASE GO BACK TO SUCKING THE ALMIGHTY CLACK **** AND KISSING EACH OTHER'S ASSES WITH YOUR FAKENESS.
ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: ghostjuggernaut on Tue, 08 September 2015, 11:26:57
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: absyrd on Tue, 08 September 2015, 11:45:56
A picture is worth 1453566442 words. There is so much drivel. Nobody complains about the wall o text spammers who take 3 paragraphs to say "cool bro".
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Joey Quinn on Tue, 08 September 2015, 12:53:47
Demik's bipolarity both confuses, annoys, and entertains me.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Tue, 08 September 2015, 12:55:16
ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Joey Quinn on Tue, 08 September 2015, 12:56:30
ಠ_ಠ

Have that macro'd yet?
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:00:04
ಠ_ಠ

Have that macro'd yet?
ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: digi on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:00:45
HHKB doesn't even have a Ctrl button, LOL - how can he paste??
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Air tree on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:01:57
HHKB doesn't even have a Ctrl button, LOL - how can he paste??
But the ctrl button is in the place of the caps lock. What are you talking about digi?
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: digi on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:03:15
HHKB doesn't even have a Ctrl button, LOL - how can he paste??
But the ctrl button is in the place of the caps lock. What are you talking about digi?

BLASPHEMY!!! (caps lock has been used, everyone stand down!)
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:04:17
HHKB doesn't even have a Ctrl button, LOL - how can he paste??

ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Air tree on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:04:20
HHKB doesn't even have a Ctrl button, LOL - how can he paste??
But the ctrl button is in the place of the caps lock. What are you talking about digi?

BLASPHEMY!!! (caps lock has been used, everyone stand down!)
Ctrl > caps lock
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: digi on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:07:34
Ctrl > caps lock

You're a Keyist!!! :)
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: katushkin on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:09:01
NOTHING TO SEE HERE. PLEASE GO BACK TO SUCKING THE ALMIGHTY CLACK **** AND KISSING EACH OTHER'S ASSES WITH YOUR FAKENESS.
ಠ_ಠ

Some people like clacks. You should probably just deal with it.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:09:43
NOTHING TO SEE HERE. PLEASE GO BACK TO SUCKING THE ALMIGHTY CLACK **** AND KISSING EACH OTHER'S ASSES WITH YOUR FAKENESS.
ಠ_ಠ

Some people like clacks. You should probably just deal with it.
ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: katushkin on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:16:35
NOTHING TO SEE HERE. PLEASE GO BACK TO SUCKING THE ALMIGHTY CLACK **** AND KISSING EACH OTHER'S ASSES WITH YOUR FAKENESS.
ಠ_ಠ

Some people like clacks. You should probably just deal with it.
ಠ_ಠ

(http://i.imgur.com/PlV1NA2.gif)
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:17:37
NOTHING TO SEE HERE. PLEASE GO BACK TO SUCKING THE ALMIGHTY CLACK **** AND KISSING EACH OTHER'S ASSES WITH YOUR FAKENESS.
ಠ_ಠ

Some people like clacks. You should probably just deal with it.
ಠ_ಠ

Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/PlV1NA2.gif)


ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: katushkin on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:21:06
ಠ_ಠ

(http://i.imgur.com/cRvhVnB.gif)
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Air tree on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:21:13
Please go back to less edgy demik pls. ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:23:32
ಠ_ಠ
Title: .
Post by: esoomenona on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:24:13
.
Title: .
Post by: esoomenona on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:24:50
.
Title: .
Post by: esoomenona on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:25:02
.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:27:10
ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ
ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ
ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ
ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: jbondeson on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:43:21
Those who have not learned to read the ancient classics in the language in which they were written must have a very imperfect knowledge of the history of the human race; for it is remarkable that no transcript of them has ever been made into any modern tongue, unless our civilization itself may be regarded as such a transcript.

That's really deep demik...
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:49:33
We seem to have reached a new level of ****-post.
Title: .
Post by: esoomenona on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:51:01
.
Title: Re: .
Post by: Air tree on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:56:18
.
(http://img.pandawhale.com/110180-Jennifer-Lawrence-okay-gif-Img-mEjK.gif)
Title: Re: .
Post by: jbondeson on Tue, 08 September 2015, 13:59:04
I did not read books the first summer; I hoed beans. Nay, I often did better than this. There were times when I could not afford to sacrifice the bloom of the present moment to any work, whether of the head or hands. I love a broad margin to my life.

That sounds very fulfilling esoomenona!
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: absyrd on Tue, 08 September 2015, 14:03:16
I figured it out.

demik got MX board.

It has infected him.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Air tree on Tue, 08 September 2015, 14:05:16
I figured it out.

demik got MX board.

It has infected him.
We must exorcise the demons from him...THE POWER OF TOPRE COMPELS YOU
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Joey Quinn on Tue, 08 September 2015, 14:07:54
We seem to have reached a new level of ****-post.

This is a cry for help from demik! He's emotionally turbulent (probably the MX infection) and just needs thousands of digital hugs.

I'm generally cold so my hugs won't do much but a Hoff could change his life.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: jerue on Tue, 08 September 2015, 14:13:28
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: tjcaustin on Tue, 08 September 2015, 14:13:45
All these people in line to get their jimjams crinkled.  They could make money charging for it.

Additionally, they really aren't spamming or doing anything worthy of the mute moose got or the ban being called for. This is literally what the ignore feature was made for.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Tue, 08 September 2015, 14:22:27
Hope you're happy you crybaby snitch
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: absyrd on Tue, 08 September 2015, 14:53:06
Snitches get switches. MX black and blue.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: digi on Tue, 08 September 2015, 14:55:01
Hope you're happy you crybaby snitch

reported
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Fire Brand on Tue, 08 September 2015, 17:32:16
He got a mute? well is it insensitive to say LOL? Maybe most likely who's the snitch then?
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Tue, 08 September 2015, 17:35:30
He got a mute? well is it insensitive to say LOL? Maybe most likely who's the snitch then?

The soft OP that made the thread. Nothing posted hurt him in any way whatsoever.

Also, it's come on. Or c'mon. Not common.


:eek: ಠ_ಠ
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: beehatch on Tue, 08 September 2015, 17:40:32
He got a mute? well is it insensitive to say LOL? Maybe most likely who's the snitch then?

The soft OP that made the thread. Nothing posted hurt him in any way whatsoever.

Also, it's come on. Or c'mon. Not common.


:eek: ಠ_ಠ

demik common
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: tjcaustin on Tue, 08 September 2015, 17:41:03
He got a mute? well is it insensitive to say LOL? Maybe most likely who's the snitch then?

The soft OP that made the thread. Nothing posted hurt him in any way whatsoever.

Also, it's come on. Or c'mon. Not common.


:eek: ಠ_ಠ

demik common

He's super common.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: absyrd on Tue, 08 September 2015, 18:00:55
He got a mute? well is it insensitive to say LOL? Maybe most likely who's the snitch then?

The soft OP that made the thread. Nothing posted hurt him in any way whatsoever.

Also, it's come on. Or c'mon. Not common.

:eek: ಠ_ಠ

demik common

He's super common.

Not an insult to hip hop fan.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: Fire Brand on Tue, 08 September 2015, 18:31:49
He got a mute? well is it insensitive to say LOL? Maybe most likely who's the snitch then?

The soft OP that made the thread. Nothing posted hurt him in any way whatsoever.

Also, it's come on. Or c'mon. Not common.


:eek: ಠ_ಠ
Ohh that kinda sucks then, I'm not really calling you lot banned though :p

Well that's a bit unlucky :X
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: azhdar on Wed, 09 September 2015, 00:15:06
I don't think he was muted for the dot or :eek: thing, most likely for the auction of HHKB4 in which he was purposely breaking multiples rules.

And ye keep playing the victim.
Title: Re: :eek: ಠ_ಠ
Post by: demik on Wed, 09 September 2015, 09:17:06
I don't think he was muted for the dot or :eek: thing, most likely for the auction of HHKB4 in which he was purposely breaking multiples rules.

And ye keep playing the victim.
Quote

Tue, 08 September 2015, 14:10:19   Editing posts to nothing, spamming   +60