I really don't understand how people think row 3 bottom row is more ergonomic... row 4 on the bottom row is similar to standard bottom row in other keycap profiles like Cherry, DCS, Filco, OEM and buckling spring.
The top row was changed from R3 to R1 for that "authentic" vintage feel... so why not make it fully sculpted all the way to the bottom row?
matt3o, the only problem with doing the bottom row in R4 has been that there are no molds for 1.25u keys in semi matte finish, which most organizers have been using with SA. Those are only available in matte finish. I think doing an entire set in matte finish would be nice, though.
23 Commando was mostly matte finish, in 1-2-3-3-3-4 profile. However, the correctly sized Shifts and Return keys are only available in semi matte finish.
Show Image
Photo credit: jil_jil32
This is why most recent full contour SA sets, including my Hack'd By Geeks, have been 3-1-2-3-4-3 row profiles in semi matte. It's always some compromise with SA.
So the choices are:
A. Semi-matte, bottom row in R3.
B. Semi-matte, bottom row in R4, except matte 1.25U R4 mods.
C. Matte, bottom row in R4, except semi-matte Shifts and Returns
D. Semi-matte, bottom row in R3 and R4 <-- don't do this!
I'd definitely prefer bottom row in R4... so either option B or C.
How did Penumbra deal with the R4 bottom row matte vs. semi-matte compromise? Is it mostly semi-matte or matte?