2. Some kits I want for myself. So I will support those prices, if necessary.
-snip-
All others will be more expansive.
Let p be the price @25 sets and n the number of sets sold, then p*25/n is an upper boundary for the per set price.
Actual price will be lower and the price @ 25 sets mostly contains some air which allows to add further keys to a kit.
Wait a second, so if one kit only gets one vote, the person who voted for that kit is going to have to pay p*25 and is only going to get one kit? Why not just order 25 kits, they pay the same price, and then they could at least have the chance of selling the extras instead of just being out the money for a single kit?
Not exactly sure how this will work for something that gets say 17 votes, but I know if I were going to have to pay a higher price for one kit when I could pay that same price for 2 or 3 kits if more people ordered, I'd just order a few more and hope to try to sell them instead of paying the same amount and getting less =\.
I just don't think if you vote for a kit you really like, and no one else votes for it, you should be stuck and haha we're ordering 1 set of that but you're gonna have to pay p*25 because you were the only one that wanted it.
Or did I read it wrong and you're not ordering kits unless you meet the specific minimum requirement, in which case my whole post is moot?