Here's a potentially unpopular opinion: MX Browns are not good or bad, they just have a logic of their own.
I've written in the past about how MX Browns are a 'chill' switch. They are not meant to provide tactility, but instead a relaxed typing experience. (Think about their inclusion in the Kinesis Advantage, which was their first outing.) They were known as "Ergo Soft" in some internal Cherry documents, if memory serves, and are supposed to provide a stress-free typing experience.
Anyway, we've gone over that ground before, as well as how Browns are a "subconscious" switch, proving just enough tactile information for your fingers to move on without thinking about the tactile feedback.
I've been testing Browns versus a number of switches in the past year, most recently Ergo Clears. And the unique character of Browns has become more apparent in that time. I am typing on some relatively heavy Ergo Clears, that actuate at 60 gr, and bottom-out at 65-70 gr. I had to retrain myself for a few days when I started using them. There's a large tactile bump, compared to browns, and a higher operating force. And stronger springs pressing back against you.
What I learned from the Ergo Clears is that, although they may have a more satisfying tactile process than MX Browns [not a hard bar to clear, I know], it's also a more conscious process. I notice it more while typing, and have to use additional muscles in order to type.
For people who want a satisfying, conscious typing experience, Ergo Clears may feel better than MX Browns. And the epitome of this kind of deliberate tactility is found in the current favourites, such as Holy Pandas and Zealios V2. And that's fine.
Browns weren't meant to compete with that, or to be like that. I've noticed that I can develop a special typing rhythm with the Browns. If you type with just enough force to actuate them, the keys roll into one-another, as you can just make whole words appear almost instantly with a minimum of force. The keyboard sounds like a staccato machine-gun when you do this, the Browns don't get in the way of your typing speed or rhythm at all. The words can appear on the screen as fast as you think, without you thinking about it, and with your fingers barely noticing.
So that's what MX Brown is meant to do: provide a comfortable typing experience that doesn't challenge you, doesn't cause stress or strain, and just flows. It's not individually satisfying in the keypress. And I've said that before. But the characteristic of being an interrupted-linear switch (and not really a "tactile") is that it's almost as easy as a light linear, but does provide that infinitesimal speck of tactility that a pure MX linear won't. And you can type reams of pages while only using a tiny number of muscles. So that's what it's for, and the switches probably lend themselves well to ergo layouts as well. But that's what I'm saying: MX Browns can be used with their own rhythm and typing style that is not identical to pure linears or 'serious' tactile switches. You can just glide the board endlessly with minimal exertion. Minimal feedback. Attempting to use it as a satisfying "tactile" switch is a primary cause of unhappiness with Browns.