much rather it be freezing cold than sweltering hot
and if you're a vegan talking about greenhouse gasses who also owns an air conditioner your argument is invalid
much rather it be freezing cold than sweltering hot
and if you're a vegan talking about greenhouse gasses who also owns an air conditioner your argument is invalid
Well, assuming everyone in the world shares the burden of creating GH-gases equally...
I've already reduced my personal total by 19% since becoming vegan for ~12 months now.
It's not about who does what.. It'll take the effort of every person in the end.
And the BOTTOM LINE is that animal foods make you sick..
Cancer
Heart Disease
Diabetes
Stroke
Impotence
(Attachment Link)
I didn't hear anything you said, I just want that hamburger
how you going to get to flavourtown without animal products tho TPShow Image(https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/551836451965399041/OAoYWFKW_400x400.jpeg)
Simply switching to renewable energy has reduced my personal CO₂ emissions almost 3.5 times as much as switching to veganism...Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/TJD2i60.png)
Mostly wind power with some solar as well.
Every picture you linked here looked delicious tp4, you're doing a terrible job converting us to veganism.
Every picture you linked here looked delicious tp4, you're doing a terrible job converting us to veganism.
The current renewable solutions are rarely available and not feasible for every neighborhood.[/size][/color]
The current renewable solutions are rarely available and not feasible for every neighborhood.[/size][/color]
Actually it's possible by buying renewable certificates (RECs). Normally my area is powered by fossil fuels but I offset my usage via RECs. It's kind of complicated, but basically all power looks the same once it hits the grid, so by buying RECs you are essentially paying for the renewables and helping renewables expand. And for the convenience I use Arcadia Power which does all of that for me.
My friend is into Pescetarianism, seems like it could be manageable goal, if you're really worried about mercury levels you can just avoid the longer lives large fish. ;D
My friend is into Pescetarianism, seems like it could be manageable goal, if you're really worried about mercury levels you can just avoid the longer lives large fish. ;D
Fish is a big nono -kiwi99 -..
They can measure a sizable cognitive performance difference among people consuming just 3 cans of tuna a week..
The conclusion being, mercury is extremely toxic to the nervous system.
IT DOESN'T TAKE MUCH, to really mess a person up..
(Attachment Link)
Some types of fish have higher levels of these beneficial fatty acids than others. Fish and shellfish that contain higher levels of these fatty acids and are also low in mercury include: anchovy, capelin, char, hake, herring, Atlantic mackerel, mullet, pollock ( Boston bluefish), salmon, smelt, rainbow trout, lake whitefish, blue crab, shrimp, clam, mussel and oyster.source (https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/food-safety/chemical-contaminants/environmental-contaminants/mercury/mercury-fish.html)
The real conclusion being if you're using tuna as your example you didn't read fully what I said or just don't understand fully. Tuna (canned albacore) is the very worst offender of mercury levels and its widely published that canned tuna does in fact pose real health risks especially to children in developmental stages of their lives (along the lines of what you said). On the other hand there is lots of seafood known to be high in the healthy fatty acids while having way lower trace mercury amounts.QuoteSome types of fish have higher levels of these beneficial fatty acids than others. Fish and shellfish that contain higher levels of these fatty acids and are also low in mercury include: anchovy, capelin, char, hake, herring, Atlantic mackerel, mullet, pollock ( Boston bluefish), salmon, smelt, rainbow trout, lake whitefish, blue crab, shrimp, clam, mussel and oyster.
If you have any source I could read about on your "fish is a big nono" that speaks about more than just tuna I would be interested in reading it.
Just don't eat fish.. it's that simple.. hahahaha
The math for a 0.24ppm fish, comes out to 24.28 Grams of fish PER DAY, any more would blow the maximum allowable mercury consumption set by the EPA.
If you ate 170 grams of this fish, (a serving), you'll be at the maximum allowable (per Week).
Who eats so little ?
And given how Giagantic a leap you can exceed the allowable mercury consumption depending on WHICH fish you eat and WHERE it came from.. There's simply no predictable way to eat Safe_Fish.
They don't sell a meter so consumers can measure the fish they buy.. It's not a safe food.
It's also important to keep in mind, that the Limit EPA sets is not an Aspirational goal for people to meet,
Ideally you want as little mercury exposure as possible.
Sure is cold on mercury, ain’t it boys
Sure is cold on mercury, ain’t it boys
I'm sure kiwi99 is a great guy..
But he's insistent on eating a mercury contaminated food..
And we didn't even talk about dioxins.. !!
http://mercuryfactsandfish.org/mercury-facts/the-safe-or-reference-dose/
Swordfish: 0.976 pm x 170 grams =166 micrograms
http://mercuryfactsandfish.org/mercury-facts/the-safe-or-reference-dose/
Swordfish: 0.976 pm x 170 grams =166 micrograms
So what you're saying is that mercury is delish?