geekhack

geekhack Marketplace => Interest Checks => Topic started by: Artemie on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:11:47

Title: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Artemie on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:11:47
Hello.

This needs zero introduction, as my original post was removed unceremoniously without reason, and mods did not respond to why it was removed.
The form that was used to gauge interest, was also botted by some rando with "No" 584 times. Don't believe me? Here's the data sheet. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_ej37uvXnlYP5tWClAknFa5IcNcrxRGGLk7dOnQrIvE/edit?usp=sharing

Basically,
Quote
sweaty keyboard nerd angry over 3 keycaps

Without further ado, I re-present to you:
GMK       Nut    Cuck    Oof

[attachimg=2]
[attachimg=3]

FAQ:

Quote
Why are you making this???
I like to use these words. Many others too frequent these words. I'd like these words on my keyboard and I'm hoping other people similarly do.

Quote
GMK won't make this!!!
Guess we'll all find out. Since, they've made a "wh0re" cap before, and rejected a weed keyset.

Quote
Why call it NCO.... I'm offended!!!
If you can feel offended by looking at just 3 letters, then maybe you really should feel bad for yourself.

Quote
It's a waste of GMK slots!!! Gonna make me wait longer for other sets!!!
Let's face it, you're not gonna get that weeb anime waifu vtuber coloured set earlier, with or without this set in the queue.

Quote
OMG IT LOOKS LIKE OLIVIA AND I AM OFFENDED!!!
Wow, ok. You need help. I have zero intention of running in other peoples "colourway" unless said maker allows their cw to be made in NCO.
I rendered the the GMK Olivia and Olive cws the last time round, knowing people like you would get angry.

MoQ: ??? TBC ???
Vendors: ??? TBC ???
Pricing: ??? TBC ???

Meme render that offended so many people the last time I posted it.
More
[attach=1]


Fortunately, the reception was mostly positive (minus the guy who botted "No"). In a less than 24 hour period, this was the result:
An 87% approval rating.
[attach=4]

Guess I'll find out if:
1. GMK will make this set.
2. Geekhack removes this post again without notice or informing me why.
3. Angry keyboard nerds get angry again.

Other than that, have a nice day. :)
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Agilr on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:13:43
No
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: productkun on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:18:36
can we get caps lock as cuck and enter as nut pls
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Omarpixel9 on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:19:53
No
Yes



Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: eskimojo on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:22:41
No
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: MK47 on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:26:22
Yes
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: BapoDonu on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:28:01
 :blank:
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Jampot_298 on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:31:28
Can you add iso enter? Thanks :)
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: fleeceman on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:32:12
Who tf frequently uses the word cuck?

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk

Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: whirlwind on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:33:18
Can't wait for any collabs

Sent from my J8110 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: of_sam on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:35:49
Who tf frequently uses the word cuck?

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk
Boys and girls with fully developed brains.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Fnzzy on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:36:15
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IsvZEBd6qXs/maxresdefault.jpg)
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Beni986 on Sat, 17 October 2020, 07:40:07
Who tf frequently uses the word cuck?

Sent from my Pixel 3a XL using Tapatalk

Cucks
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: $W4GK!NG on Sat, 17 October 2020, 08:03:59
Is the sample picture the final color way that is going to be offer in the GB(if it ever happen)? or is the color subject to change? I would love to see more color ;)
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Artemie on Sat, 17 October 2020, 08:06:26
Is the sample picture the final color way that is going to be offer in the GB(if it ever happen)? or is the color subject to change? I would love to see more color ;)

I chose these colours due to the vast compatibility that they have against other sets, as well as having a low enough MoQ to produce.
If there are colourways that can replace the current offered kit, and are stock GMK colours, then I would be happy to consider.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: akimbra on Sat, 17 October 2020, 08:13:16
Yes
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: wellbeing44 on Sat, 17 October 2020, 08:26:05
Cuck me daddy  :p :p :p
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: KingOfMemes on Sat, 17 October 2020, 08:52:11
I'm in for no other reason than to support you calling out the neckbeard crybaby bull**** that plagues this place  :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: $W4GK!NG on Sat, 17 October 2020, 08:54:56
Is the sample picture the final color way that is going to be offer in the GB(if it ever happen)? or is the color subject to change? I would love to see more color ;)

I chose these colours due to the vast compatibility that they have against other sets, as well as having a low enough MoQ to produce.
If there are colourways that can replace the current offered kit, and are stock GMK colours, then I would be happy to consider.
Sadly the color that I would love to see is all custom color like MoDo teal amd stuff, but this is cool nonetheless


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: yui_ on Sat, 17 October 2020, 09:04:19
sooooooooo lit, glwic!!!!!
i'm in for 2 sets
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Kajoler on Sat, 17 October 2020, 09:37:03
make
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Vigrith on Sat, 17 October 2020, 09:40:14
Stuff like this is honestly best off being conducted through Discord because that is where the vast majority of the target audience resides - if you actually want the set to be produced and aren't just trying to be funny, doing something like this here is about as useful as doing it on deskthority. Only reason to (re)post anything like this on geekhack is to generate animosity for the sake of provoking a reaction, and the post likely will just end up being deleted again (because it should), which is not going to get you a meaningful increase in sales.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Lil on Sat, 17 October 2020, 10:06:24
Is the sample picture the final color way that is going to be offer in the GB(if it ever happen)? or is the color subject to change? I would love to see more color ;)

Please let us know where we can send you crayons, so you can see more color
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Artemie on Sat, 17 October 2020, 10:28:53
Stuff like this is honestly best off being conducted through Discord because that is where the vast majority of the target audience resides - if you actually want the set to be produced and aren't just trying to be funny, doing something like this here is about as useful as doing it on deskthority. Only reason to (re)post anything like this on geekhack is to generate animosity for the sake of provoking a reaction, and the post likely will just end up being deleted again (because it should), which is not going to get you a meaningful increase in sales.

Why my original post got deleted in the first place was never explained to me, hence why I had to repost it.

I posted it here in Interest Checks, to generate interest, as per the point of the forum. The intent is simple and clear.
What I want is to generate interest in the product I want to get produced, as well as obtain constructive criticism and feedback on the kit, colours.

If you, or anyone for that matter feel provoked, that's on yourselves.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: treeleaf64 on Sat, 17 October 2020, 10:52:55
Noncommissioned officer
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Vigrith on Sat, 17 October 2020, 11:00:34
Why my original post got deleted in the first place was never explained to me, hence why I had to repost it.

I posted it here in Interest Checks, to generate interest, as per the point of the forum. The intent is simple and clear.
What I want is to generate interest in the product I want to get produced, as well as obtain constructive criticism and feedback on the kit, colours.

If you, or anyone for that matter feel provoked, that's on yourselves.

Surely you can infer why the post was deleted. It provided no information, the subject matter was/is questionable and 80% of the replies were pyramid quote chains. It was probably to do with one (or all) of those. I would assume you know this, because it would explain the incredibly condescending and snide tone of your new post (that little "FAQ" section, etc). If you don't, that's on you.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: treeleaf64 on Sat, 17 October 2020, 11:53:11
Why my original post got deleted in the first place was never explained to me, hence why I had to repost it.

I posted it here in Interest Checks, to generate interest, as per the point of the forum. The intent is simple and clear.
What I want is to generate interest in the product I want to get produced, as well as obtain constructive criticism and feedback on the kit, colours.

If you, or anyone for that matter feel provoked, that's on yourselves.

Surely you can infer why the post was deleted. It provided no information, the subject matter was/is questionable and 80% of the replies were pyramid quote chains. It was probably to do with one (or all) of those. I would assume you know this, because it would explain the incredibly condescending and snide tone of your new post (that little "FAQ" section, etc). If you don't, that's on you.

 It's a pretty degenerate topic, I can see support for it  but  for the most part it's an inappropriate thing that should not be on geekhack
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Kokaloo on Sat, 17 October 2020, 12:23:41
lol funi words xD lolol
epic for the win!!!!
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Havattack on Sat, 17 October 2020, 12:35:26
Why my original post got deleted in the first place was never explained to me, hence why I had to repost it.

I posted it here in Interest Checks, to generate interest, as per the point of the forum. The intent is simple and clear.
What I want is to generate interest in the product I want to get produced, as well as obtain constructive criticism and feedback on the kit, colours.

If you, or anyone for that matter feel provoked, that's on yourselves.

Surely you can infer why the post was deleted. It provided no information, the subject matter was/is questionable and 80% of the replies were pyramid quote chains. It was probably to do with one (or all) of those. I would assume you know this, because it would explain the incredibly condescending and snide tone of your new post (that little "FAQ" section, etc). If you don't, that's on you.

 It's a pretty degenerate topic, I can see support for it  but  for the most part it's an inappropriate thing that should not be on geekhack

ugh. It's not "degenerate." Explain in a logical way how it is in anyway immoral. Who is it harming? Why is it "inappropriate" explain with logic please.
inb4 my stupid holy book, says so, or some other silly superstitious garbage.
People that let things that have nothing to do with them, and affect them in no way, are just ugh, and lack common sense.
And this is coming from someone who think this set is stupid, and the colorway is meh.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: praystashion on Sat, 17 October 2020, 14:29:51
Please add "simp" and "vibe"
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: jagger27 on Sat, 17 October 2020, 14:47:56
Looking forward to seeing this removed again
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: azzipa on Sat, 17 October 2020, 14:49:42
Muh 1st amendment. Don’t like this? Don’t buy it.

I am willing to wager the vast majority of people on GH regularly use words that are more offensive (to some/others/my grandmother) than these three. Is this divisive? Is that even a relevant question in a world that routinely pushes divisiveness through identity politics? I just shrug and move on because I realized a long time ago that what people say quite often says more about their relationship with themself than it does about me. H8rs gonna h8. Peace.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Havattack on Sat, 17 October 2020, 15:05:49
Karen is EVERYWHERE theses days! Go away lady!
It's insane that anyone could find a mere "word" offensive. Something that lacks any intrinsic meaning, and is simply a tool used to communicate ideas. You may find the meaning you, or the person saying the word, has assigned the word to be offensive, but the word itself? Silly nonsense.
I guess part of being alive during the best time in history is finding made up stuff to get upset about... whatever.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Vigrith on Sat, 17 October 2020, 15:12:53
And this is coming from someone who think this set is stupid, and the colorway is meh.

But would you like it if it had a "ugh" keycap?

In all seriousness though I agree with your sentiment for the most part, although the way you phrased it is pretty silly in my opinion and I don't think it helps your argument at all. It's not about whether or not some people are affected or bothered by what's being presented, or about whether or not they are within their right to feel that way - it's more so the way the post is laid out, the way stuff is said and just the general negative connotation associated with the people that tend to enjoy this sort of "humour" leaves a bad taste in people's mouths (be it for the right or wrong reasons).
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Havattack on Sat, 17 October 2020, 15:23:14
And this is coming from someone who think this set is stupid, and the colorway is meh.

But would you like it if it had a "ugh" keycap?

In all seriousness though I agree with your sentiment for the most part, although the way you phrased it is pretty silly in my opinion and I don't think it helps your argument at all. It's not about whether or not some people are affected or bothered by what's being presented, or about whether or not they are within their right to feel that way - it's more so the way the post is laid out, the way stuff is said and just the general negative connotation associated with the people that tend to enjoy this sort of "humour" leaves a bad taste in people's mouths (be it for the right or wrong reasons).
I'm, perfectly happy with how i phrased it, and you in no way demonstrated how it was "silly" (not that it wasn't, i tried to make it silly, you simply did not explain how it was), and more importantly, you did not explain how it being "silly" some how detract from my argument.
I don't think it is about how it was presented, i think it's pretty obvious it's the content itself.
"just the general negative connotation associated with the people that tend to enjoy this sort of "humour" leaves a bad taste in people's mouths" You really think whats bothering them is the prejudice they have to people that find that kind of stuff amusing, and not the stuff they find amusing itself? Maybe, but i see no evidence of that.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: azzipa on Sat, 17 October 2020, 15:27:50
I apologize. There are other boards for this discourse. That said, I’m planning my new IC. To be called ‘NSFW’ or ‘SafeSpace’. Stay tuned.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: godinjointform on Sat, 17 October 2020, 15:38:36
looks like ****
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: jagger27 on Sat, 17 October 2020, 15:43:24
It's insane that anyone could find a mere "word" offensive. Something that lacks any intrinsic meaning, and is simply a tool used to communicate ideas. You may find the meaning you, or the person saying the word, has assigned the word to be offensive, but the word itself? Silly nonsense.

So a word lacks meaning, except for the ideas it conveys? :thinking:

I guess part of being alive during the best time in history is finding made a stuff to get upset about... whatever.

Including being mad about other people being mad

I apologize. There are other boards for this discourse. That said, I’m planning my new IC. To be called ‘NSFW’ or ‘SafeSpace’. Stay tuned.
lol
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Kokaloo on Sat, 17 October 2020, 15:53:01
Seems like people are only getting behind this because of the discord it's creating, rather than the design itself. Hmmmm!
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Tree_ on Sat, 17 October 2020, 16:35:13
Will this be stocked at every Hot Topic or just select stores?
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: HoodrowThrillson on Sat, 17 October 2020, 18:10:07
Don't Let Memes Be Dreams
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: naasfu on Sat, 17 October 2020, 18:40:30
no
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: nickheller on Sat, 17 October 2020, 18:44:25
no
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Puddsy on Sat, 17 October 2020, 19:35:47
the guy who botted it was right
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Auxo on Sat, 17 October 2020, 19:55:27
lol no
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Havattack on Sat, 17 October 2020, 20:06:49

So a word lacks meaning, except for the ideas it conveys? :thinking:
No, as i so very clearly put it, words lack INTRINSIC meaning, they mean whatever the person saying them wants them to, and to a lesser degree the person hearing them.


Including being mad about other people being mad
Yes, including that. (Though i am not "mad", maybe annoyed and frustrated, but you can perceive what i said was in anger if you wish, it doesn't matter, becasue whether i said it in anger or not, it was simply a comment, I am not trying to stop anyone from doing anything that doesn't effect other people. Unlike the Karens of the world.)
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: jagger27 on Sat, 17 October 2020, 21:32:13
No, as i so very clearly put it, words lack INTRINSIC meaning, they mean whatever the person saying them wants them to, and to a lesser degree the person hearing them.
what a vacuous nothingburger argument. ok let me try: you're great! Oh, by the way, I now declare that great means "not good". Come on now.

Yes, including that. (Though i am not "mad", maybe annoyed and frustrated, but you can perceive what i said was in anger if you wish, it doesn't matter, becasue whether i said it in anger or not, it was simply a comment, I am not trying to stop anyone from doing anything that doesn't effect other people. Unlike the Karens of the world.)
I would like to speak to your manager please.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: DasGnome on Sat, 17 October 2020, 21:42:47
Lol @ "not on my GeekHack!"

Again I repeat: nut
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Havattack on Sun, 18 October 2020, 00:31:03
what a vacuous nothingburger argument."
I will happily ignore your bald assertion, becasue it's clearly false, if it wasn't, you would of been able to identify how it's "vacuous", instead of just make bald assertions. It wasn't an "argument" either, what you quoted was a simple FACT, unless you want to try and make an argument for prescriptivism? But you can't, becasue it's nonsense.
ok let me try: you're great! Oh, by the way, I now declare that great means "not good". Come on now.
That's fine, as long as you explain what you mean by "you're great", we can go ahead and move on with the conversation, becasue as i have had to explain to you for like the 3rd time, what matters is not the "word" or the symbol, but the meaning behind the word/symbol. Isn't  in great how language works! Now you know sweetheart, congrats!

Jesus christ... how do teachers do it...
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: CustomerSupport on Sun, 18 October 2020, 02:35:42
the guy who botted it was right

Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: jagger27 on Sun, 18 October 2020, 04:15:02
the meaning behind the word/symbol.

Which is why this set shouldn’t be made. That was whole lot of arbitrary symbols just to say “mad”
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: paperassgasket on Sun, 18 October 2020, 06:05:55
Says post needs "no introduction"
*proceeds to write a paragraph introducing the post*
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: bow3i on Sun, 18 October 2020, 06:46:11
make this

those who find it offensive

umadbro?  ;)
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: see on Sun, 18 October 2020, 07:04:55
As said in the first thread, please do this.

Memes are memes.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: udller on Sun, 18 October 2020, 07:55:35
it would be nice if it could have additional caps in the set. personaly id like a **** keycap. or ****ing-****. or pine to put next to the nut keycap.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: vegs on Sun, 18 October 2020, 08:18:50
yikes
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Havattack on Sun, 18 October 2020, 12:34:07
the meaning behind the word/symbol.

Which is why this set shouldn’t be made. That was whole lot of arbitrary symbols just to say “mad”

Why? What's wrong with the meaning behind those words? How is the meaning of "cuck" in anyway immoral? Who does it harm? Same for the other 2 words. Try to explain with logic please.- Thanks.

We've established how the mere symbols themselves can not be harmful (FINALLY), so it must be the meaning behind those symbols that is in someway causing harm, explain how. 
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: jagger27 on Sun, 18 October 2020, 14:53:36
Why? What's wrong with the meaning behind those words? How is the meaning of "cuck" in anyway immoral? Who does it harm? Same for the other 2 words. Try to explain with logic please.- Thanks.

We've established how the mere symbols themselves can not be harmful (FINALLY), so it must be the meaning behind those symbols that is in someway causing harm, explain how.

I'm not going to debate you, Ben Shapiro
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: pool on Sun, 18 October 2020, 15:05:45
Arguments on philosophy, politics, humor, memes, trolling aside

I say try to bring this to life and let people vote with their wallets

Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: beigeandbrown on Sun, 18 October 2020, 17:39:17
Why? What's wrong with the meaning behind those words? How is the meaning of "cuck" in anyway immoral? Who does it harm? Same for the other 2 words. Try to explain with logic please.- Thanks.

We've established how the mere symbols themselves can not be harmful (FINALLY), so it must be the meaning behind those symbols that is in someway causing harm, explain how.

I'm not going to debate you, Ben Shapiro
It's not like it's the N-word on the keycap, it really has almost no meaning, except to those who find it a funny meme. I mean if this hobby isn't about doing ridiculous things for the heck of it then what is it for. Look at handarbeit or gregory. Just because a set isn't oblivion, 9009, or space cadet doesn't mean it doesn't deserve to be ran. If there is interest, it should be ran 100%. Not even in a capitalist sort of way, but like it seems that a lot of people would love to have it on their boards, why should anyone get to dictate what people have on their boards, especially if it does no harm to anyone?
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: KingOfMemes on Sun, 18 October 2020, 18:12:41
Why? What's wrong with the meaning behind those words? How is the meaning of "cuck" in anyway immoral? Who does it harm? Same for the other 2 words. Try to explain with logic please.- Thanks.

We've established how the mere symbols themselves can not be harmful (FINALLY), so it must be the meaning behind those symbols that is in someway causing harm, explain how.

I'm not going to debate you, Ben Shapiro
It's not like it's the N-word on the keycap, it really has almost no meaning, except to those who find it a funny meme. I mean if this hobby isn't about doing ridiculous things for the heck of it then what is it for. Look at handarbeit or gregory. Just because a set isn't oblivion, 9009, or space cadet doesn't mean it doesn't deserve to be ran. If there is interest, it should be ran 100%. Not even in a capitalist sort of way, but like it seems that a lot of people would love to have it on their boards, why should anyone get to dictate what people have on their boards, especially if it does no harm to anyone?
Yes, but this is a Christian forum
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Havattack on Mon, 19 October 2020, 11:43:52
Yes, but this is a Christian forum
Really, does that mean i have to buy into some silly, superstitious nonesense, and immoral garbage to post here? Bummer. (The rules here are stupid, but not that stupid.)

But, PRAISE lil' Jeezy. (That's his pet name, we cool like that.)
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Havattack on Mon, 19 October 2020, 11:45:40
I'm not going to debate you, Ben Shapiro
Low blow bra, low blow... Probably the meanest thing anyone has ever said to me...
And that's becasue you know, objectively speaking, I'm correct. If some dude wants his wife be with other dudes, that's his pathetic business, and it effects no one else, especially in any negative, harmful, way.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: CustomerSupport on Tue, 20 October 2020, 00:07:55
Why? What's wrong with the meaning behind those words? How is the meaning of "cuck" in anyway immoral? Who does it harm? Same for the other 2 words. Try to explain with logic please.- Thanks.

We've established how the mere symbols themselves can not be harmful (FINALLY), so it must be the meaning behind those symbols that is in someway causing harm, explain how.

I'm not going to debate you, Ben Shapiro

Yes, but this is a Christian forum

Y'all omg 😂🤭💀

--

IMO the mods were right to remove this in the first place. This thread while funny, is a dumpster fire.

But let's be honest, that's partly why this "IC" was made in the first place, no? Not sure why OP is getting flustered at people ****posting when you can't honestly IC a "nut/cuck/oof" addon set without being a ****poster.

Can't take the heat, you know the rest.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: gilbert on Tue, 20 October 2020, 16:24:40
gib pls
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: surfmurder on Tue, 20 October 2020, 17:00:22
I'll buy it just to make sure it hits MOQ.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: azzipa on Tue, 20 October 2020, 19:13:50
 :thumb:

I'll buy it just to make sure it hits MOQ.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: vidas on Tue, 20 October 2020, 21:33:02
Yes. You are obligated to make this after getting hit with the "you're wasting gmk slots!!! omg" message. It is an omen. This demonic sigil first appeared during the Heckcaps IC in which a friend said something similar in the reddit comments.
An IC is not needed, you know what to do.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: azzipa on Wed, 21 October 2020, 09:47:21
I promise myself to stay away from this thread and I keep coming back. Yes I'm weak. But I'm a firm believer in letting people be idiots, fools and drunkards. Words are not violence. Just because (you) say they are does not make it so. In that spirit ima leave this here (https://pimpmykeyboard.com/sa-novelty-keys/). SA profile.

(https://cdn10.bigcommerce.com/s-ktpi93fl/products/273/images/1601/sa_novelty_keys__80725.1551908419.1280.1280.jpg?c=2)
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: jagger27 on Wed, 21 October 2020, 16:58:08
I promise myself to stay away from this thread and I keep coming back. Yes I'm weak. But I'm a firm believer in letting people be idiots, fools and drunkards. Words are not violence. Just because (you) say they are does not make it so. In that spirit ima leave this here (https://pimpmykeyboard.com/sa-novelty-keys/). SA profile.

Show Image
(https://cdn10.bigcommerce.com/s-ktpi93fl/products/273/images/1601/sa_novelty_keys__80725.1551908419.1280.1280.jpg?c=2)


Literally none of those have the same use case as a “cuck” keycap. Don’t like what someone said? Too liberal? Too sheepish? Too weak? Must be a cuck then! These keycaps have an explicit message from a specific group of people that aren’t possible to reason with.

edit: it’s a ****ty low effort set that appeals to the sweatiest of all neckbeards, would happily include more offensive and targeted words if allowed, and is a factual waste of slots.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: bigfishkb on Wed, 21 October 2020, 18:16:12
Every time I come back to this thread I find myself wanting this set more and more. I'll buy just to help reach moq. This is hilarious and more people need a sense of humor when it comes to these type of IC's.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: KingOfMemes on Wed, 21 October 2020, 18:37:22
Every time I come back to this thread I find myself wanting this set more and more. I'll buy just to help reach moq. This is hilarious and more people need a sense of humor when it comes to these type of IC's.
If I've learned anything here, it's that keycaps with bull**** drama and forum needle****ing behind them will sell better. I have a lot of faith in this set
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Havattack on Wed, 21 October 2020, 20:28:47
Every time I come back to this thread I find myself wanting this set more and more. I'll buy just to help reach moq. This is hilarious and more people need a sense of humor when it comes to these type of IC's.

I don't think this set is funny, i think it's kind of dumb, like if someone tried to make a "you mad bro?"when that was a popular troll comment, i.e. annoying and overused, but the fact this pisses so many humorless cucks off, is absolutely hilarious.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: jagger27 on Wed, 21 October 2020, 21:42:04
Allow me to apply some logic:

I don't think this set is funny, i think it's kind of dumb,

Havattack does not find this set funny.

this pisses so many humorless cucks off, is absolutely hilarious.

Those who do not find this set funny are cucks.

Ergo, Havattack is a humorless cuck. QED.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: kokugatsu on Wed, 21 October 2020, 22:29:34
Don’t find this interesting or funny. Still, not opposed to you running it.

If people actually want to display cringey edgelord keycaps, it’s their own choice to make. Just like how everyone else have the prerogative to make fun of them.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: alanskiii on Wed, 21 October 2020, 22:46:25
I'm only buying if it's in that one pink
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Havattack on Tue, 27 October 2020, 12:38:57
Allow me to apply some logic:

I don't think this set is funny, i think it's kind of dumb,

Havattack does not find this set funny.

this pisses so many humorless cucks off, is absolutely hilarious.

Those who do not find this set funny are cucks.

Ergo, Havattack is a humorless cuck. QED.
"Those who do not find this set funny are cucks" That is not what i said, or implied, please stop lying. That's actually immoral, unlike this silly cuck stuff you like to fetishize.

Do you not understand the difference between "not finding funny" and the way some of you Karen's are getting your panties in a bunch over it? No, i guess you don't. Allow me to educate you: It is the difference between being indifferent (me), and being offended, (you and other cucks.) You're welcome.   
You have demonstrated a complete lack of logic in this interaction buddy. I suggest you look into skepticism, it might stop you from being so wrong all the time..- Toodles
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: paulgali on Wed, 28 October 2020, 04:14:02
Offence is taken, not given. It's a meme IC, and y'all need to relax a small bit.

If you don't want it, ignore the IC, ignore anything to do with it. It isn't that hard.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: MdotMaxson on Sun, 01 November 2020, 06:19:11
I like people with unapologenic style. Not afraid to laugh at the joke that is 95% of the people who are super into keyboards.

Oh and I’m offended. Gonna go hide in my basement with Joe. Come on man.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: maximize on Sun, 01 November 2020, 09:19:10
No.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: unknownh on Mon, 09 November 2020, 00:35:14
cuck
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: zea on Wed, 11 November 2020, 00:14:28
I unironically want this set, would prefer the cuck keycap to be a backspace and the nut to be an enter tho.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Darth WTF on Mon, 18 January 2021, 15:50:33
(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/664204454198902819/800844153574654012/fetchimage.png)
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: hkiri on Mon, 18 January 2021, 15:55:13
I still want it.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: scrps on Mon, 18 January 2021, 16:08:42
glwic. if i had the money i would buy to help it reach moq
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Qarmaa on Sat, 13 February 2021, 10:18:03
bump
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Rx003 on Fri, 19 February 2021, 05:11:25
Yes or Yes
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Buburoo on Fri, 19 February 2021, 05:58:15
my original post was removed unceremoniously without reason, and mods did not respond to why it was removed.

Good mods

The form that was used to gauge interest, was also botted by some rando with "No" 584 times. Don't believe me? Here's the data sheet. [/size]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_ej37uvXnlYP5tWClAknFa5IcNcrxRGGLk7dOnQrIvE/edit?usp=sharing

Good Bot
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: kdam39 on Sun, 07 March 2021, 04:47:08
m nut
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: phatmasterq on Mon, 08 March 2021, 01:06:18
well, i hope it gets made cuz i'd be 100% in (as is).
Only change that I'd love to see is the inlusion of one bright/accent-type colour. Don't much mind which - RGBY etc. I love pinks myself, but totally get where you're coming from with selecting compatible/standard colours so, if there's one that works within that, i'd love it. Otherwise, make it it is and i'll still cop.
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Lysol_ on Sun, 30 January 2022, 19:16:17
ne updates? or is this considered dead at this point...
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: MJGameSix on Sun, 30 January 2022, 22:07:28
Does this need to GMK?
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Botty212 on Mon, 31 January 2022, 01:25:35
like the idea but not the words chosen


Gesendet von iPad mit Tapatalk
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: ai06L on Mon, 31 January 2022, 05:20:56
CUCK
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: QWER|key on Mon, 31 January 2022, 05:31:30
"This needs zero introduction"

Followed by not only an introduction, but an entire backstory replete with archived material. (shrug)

This doesn't offend me, I'm just puzzled as to why anyone would want this. Even if you liked the words for some weird reason, it's extremely limited as to what you could use these with without looking like ass any way. Is this a cry for help?
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: DeMechanica on Mon, 31 January 2022, 05:40:45
"This needs zero introduction"

Followed by not only an introduction, but an entire backstory replete with archived material. (shrug)

This doesn't offend me, I'm just puzzled as to why anyone would want this. Even if you liked the words for some weird reason, it's extremely limited as to what you could use these with without looking like ass any way. Is this a cry for help?

Calling it a cry for help is honestly the sad thing. It’s a meme add on set. Why do you care what people find funny?
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: Fraaaan on Mon, 31 January 2022, 05:43:16
"This needs zero introduction"

Followed by not only an introduction, but an entire backstory replete with archived material. (shrug)

This doesn't offend me, I'm just puzzled as to why anyone would want this. Even if you liked the words for some weird reason, it's extremely limited as to what you could use these with without looking like ass any way. Is this a cry for help?

These are some very deep thoughts for a few pieces of plastic with funny words on them. Is this a cry for help?
Title: Re: [IC] GMK NCO (2nd Post)
Post by: ankit on Sun, 06 February 2022, 23:04:14
I will buy this.