I can't register to geekhack because I don't know the answer of 2 of the securit

[zoo]

props for not mis-labeling your not-ic with [IC]

[$W4GK!NG]

hot damm LULW

I missed the clown fiesta again, and imagine thinking you can just edit your post and think everyone is going to believe it OMEGALUL, how can you even think of doing this in the first place, posting about not being able to create an account but you're using an account to post LULW. Also when confronted just take it like a man/woman you are, don't chicken out like this

[SpenceFence]

Look I honestly just came here because I was looking for the meme set and found so much more...

[Coreda]

Anyways, the original geekhack devs should be ashamed of themselves for implementing such poor UI/UX, those 'security questions' are a joke to modern web development. They aren't preventing automation in any way

Are you sure of this?

[JKKEEBS]

Love the colors on this might pick it up later.

[-Jerry-]

Well this was a fun experience I wasn’t expecting.

[ee]

my brain is ****ing toasted after reading this i have no idea what is going on

[Izeri]

my brain is ****ing toasted after reading this i have no idea what is going on

Witch hunting

[yh]

my brain is ****ing toasted after reading this i have no idea what is going on

Witch hunting

so did he find out the answers to the 2 security questions in the end? that's the real question i'm interested in, could anyone pls tell me how answering questions became a whole witch hunt suddenly what is going on oh my lord today is the day the titans broke wall maria oh no oh god someone save eren's mom

[hottrout]

Portal ... must have been a portal.

[treeleaf64]

You are a bad boy

[sGhost]

You are a bad boy

Agree.

[ShiroMoria]

''the art of the deskmat, is it something you drew?''

''Yes''

That wasn't very cash money of you

[dahun.kim@]

Why did you do this?

[Jebus]

Is this thread part of the Geekhack canon, or is it part of the extended universe?

[Reebes]

You are a bad boy

He has spoken. U are bad.

How do so many ppl not understand what happened here? Read the comments lmao

[$W4GK!NG]

You are a bad boy

Tree man has come to give you your judgement

[mcmaxmcmc]

lmao, love to see a Part 2 of this in your next IC! 

[Vigrith]

What kinda schizo **** happened here

[HoffmanMyster]

Anyways, the original geekhack devs should be ashamed of themselves for implementing such poor UI/UX, those 'security questions' are a joke to modern web development. They aren't preventing automation in any way

Are you sure of this?

It actually does help; we noticed a sizeable decrease in spam accounts after adding in the two additional questions. Granted, over time, these answers get added to the spam-bots' data set and we need to add a few more questions as time goes on, but they're not useless.


For anyone curious, the OP copied the new text from this reddit thread for some reason. Typically we see this sort of thing with spam accounts, but this one looks to be an actual person, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[elmo]

Anyways, the original geekhack devs should be ashamed of themselves for implementing such poor UI/UX, those 'security questions' are a joke to modern web development. They aren't preventing automation in any way

Are you sure of this?

It actually does help; we noticed a sizeable decrease in spam accounts after adding in the two additional questions. Granted, over time, these answers get added to the spam-bots' data set and we need to add a few more questions as time goes on, but they're not useless.


For anyone curious, the OP copied the new text from this reddit thread for some reason. Typically we see this sort of thing with spam accounts, but this one looks to be an actual person, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Show Image

He edited the post to hide it's original content which you can see here:
https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=111206.msg3013823#msg3013823

He also created a second account and reposted the IC again probably to hide the fact that he f*cked up.
The reposted thread is here: https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=111217.0

iirc having multiple accounts is against the rules...

[HoffmanMyster]

Anyways, the original geekhack devs should be ashamed of themselves for implementing such poor UI/UX, those 'security questions' are a joke to modern web development. They aren't preventing automation in any way

Are you sure of this?

It actually does help; we noticed a sizeable decrease in spam accounts after adding in the two additional questions. Granted, over time, these answers get added to the spam-bots' data set and we need to add a few more questions as time goes on, but they're not useless.


For anyone curious, the OP copied the new text from this reddit thread for some reason. Typically we see this sort of thing with spam accounts, but this one looks to be an actual person, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Show Image

He edited the post to hide it's original content which you can see here:
https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=111206.msg3013823#msg3013823

He also created a second account and reposted the IC again probably to hide the fact that he f*cked up.
The reposted thread is here: https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=111217.0

iirc having multiple accounts is against the rules...

Oh, it very much is. I hadn't seen the duplicate account/post when I responded, but that has opened a whole new can of worms.