geekhack

geekhack Community => Off Topic => Topic started by: microsoft windows on Thu, 18 August 2011, 12:30:20

Title: TLDR: use Windows 98, the Cult of (Formerly the microsoft windows megathread)
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 18 August 2011, 12:30:20
Even over 10 years after its release, more people use Internet Explorer 6 than Apple computers. The fastest browser that can render modern web pages is still alive and well!

I'd say that Internet Explorer 6 has to be one of the best and most successful web browsers ever.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: hcry4 on Thu, 18 August 2011, 12:42:29
When I started my job 3 years ago, we were still using XP and IE6. They have since "upgraded" to Vista and IE7. It's nice to have tabs, but javascript is still crap on IE7.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Pylon on Thu, 18 August 2011, 13:29:30
Mostly because of businesses. Same reason XP still has massive market share. Almost every large institution I've been to still uses XP.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: vils on Thu, 18 August 2011, 13:52:48
I used Win2K until recently.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: The Solutor on Thu, 18 August 2011, 14:02:22
I'm used to open explorer just to run windows update, if I'm running xp or older windows.

Other than that there isn't a single reason to use it for a single user.

Unluckily the corporate environment is a different matter.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: ch_123 on Thu, 18 August 2011, 14:09:43
I read somewhere that on a daily basis, for every Google search, there are 200 million COBOL transactions.

Businesses have a bad habit of perpetuating silly things like this.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: N8N on Thu, 18 August 2011, 14:30:49
I really wish that my company hadn't written certain web-based applications specifically for IE6, as many web sites - including some of our vendors - are now completely broken for IE6.

Or at least if they'd let me install Firefox in parallel w/ IE6 so I could actually get useful work done without having to use my personal machine to look stuff up after hours.

Not that I'm bitter or anything.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Findecanor on Thu, 18 August 2011, 14:33:16
Quote from: hcry4;401055
It's nice to have tabs, but javascript is still crap on IE7.

Multiple windows and a good window manager are superior to tabs.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: bluecar5556 on Thu, 18 August 2011, 14:36:15
IE, you mean the internet browser from IE4-6 that has shell integration with Windows Explorer and becomes unstable, if it is removed?  

Eww

"Internet Explorer removal has changed over its version history, but the nature of many of its upgrades and installation methods have been a matter of public interest. The first version to be included was version 2 with Windows 95 in late 1996. Later, users who upgraded to IE3 (which came out in 1996), could still use the last IE, because the installation converted the previous version to separate directory.

However, Internet Explorer 4 created a controversy with its shell integration with Windows Explorer, and with later versions removal (or inability to do so) became more complicated. The idea of removing Internet Explorer from a Microsoft Windows operating system was proposed during the United States v. Microsoft case. Later, some security advocates took up the idea as a way to protect Windows systems from attack via IE vulnerabilities. By the release of Internet Explorer 7, some of the shell integration began being reduced, such as changing ActiveX hosting and a different look than Windows Explorer.

As of build 7048 of Windows 7, Microsoft added the ability to safely remove Internet Explorer from Windows.[2] Dependencies such as the Trident layout engine are not removed through this process, but the Internet Explorer executable (iexplore.exe) is removed without harming any other Windows components, thus preventing Internet Explorer itself from running. It was proposed that a special version of Windows 7, Windows 7 E, would be shipped without Internet Explorer in Europe as a result of EU antitrust investigations against Microsoft.[3][4][5][6][7] However, in July 2009, Microsoft cancelled the Windows 7 E editions due to negative reactions from computer manufacturers."
-Removal of Internet Explorer/Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Removal_of_Internet_Explorer)
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 18 August 2011, 14:59:37
You know, Wikipedia looks a lot better in IE6 than in your posts.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: bluecar5556 on Thu, 18 August 2011, 15:05:58
Is it possible to downgrade IE 8.0.6001.18702 with IE6 under XP and go back to IE8?  If so, i'll gladly check it out, it's been a while.  The reason why I ask is because this isn't my computer.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 18 August 2011, 15:09:01
You should be able to do so without much trouble. I downgraded one of my computers from IE8 to IE6 a while back.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: bluecar5556 on Thu, 18 August 2011, 15:17:57
Wait, I just realized the windows software box on your avatar only says "Windows," must be 1.0?

[video=youtube_share;tGvHNNOLnCk]http://youtu.be/tGvHNNOLnCk[/video]


[video=youtube_share;e8M6S8EKbnU]http://youtu.be/e8M6S8EKbnU[/video]
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 18 August 2011, 16:29:02
It's a classic Windows 3.1 box.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: kps on Thu, 18 August 2011, 16:33:39
If Internet Explorer did die, would its rotting corpse look any different than it does today?
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: EverythingIBM on Fri, 19 August 2011, 04:52:07
I'm most familiar with IE5.... those were the days. Loading up a dial-up connection on IE5 in the late 90's up until 2003. Then something horrible happened which made me temporarily "upgrade". But that's been resolved.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: itlnstln on Fri, 19 August 2011, 09:03:27
Quote from: microsoft windows;401045
Even over 10 years after its release, more people use Internet Explorer 6 than Apple computers. The fastest browser that can render modern web pages is still alive and well!

I'd say that Internet Explorer 6 has to be one of the best and most successful web browsers ever.

A few months off, and I still see that some things never change.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 20 August 2011, 07:15:38
You gotta admit, though, that no other Internet software has enjoyed the level of popularity, success, and longeivity as MSIE6.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Sat, 20 August 2011, 08:42:40
Apache?
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: keyboardlover on Sat, 20 August 2011, 08:46:19
I was thinking perhaps IIS as well...
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: kps on Sat, 20 August 2011, 08:46:57
B I N D?

[Edit: stop “correcting” my spelling, vBulletin.]
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: The Solutor on Sat, 20 August 2011, 11:28:19
Sendmail
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: bigpook on Sat, 20 August 2011, 13:17:06
Postfix
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: liist on Sat, 20 August 2011, 23:30:55
Most of the computers at my workplace are still XP with IE6 or earlier. It's perfectly fine for checking logged hours and adjusting our schedules. We actually can't adjust our schedules without using IE.
Title: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: bluecar5556 on Sun, 21 August 2011, 00:01:06
What's with websites only working with IE?  Never understood that, anyone?

Could it have anything to do with M$ shell integration into windows explorer?  Is M$ slowly becoming the ultimate monopoly alliance of all time?

"An alliance is an agreement or friendship between two or more parties, made in order to advance common goals and to secure common interests."

"The verb "monopolise" refers to the process by which a company gains much greater market share than what is expected with perfect competition."

Meanwhile, Steve Jobs with ridiculous amounts of money is being treated for his cancer with Chemical  -  Therapy drugs at "the same Clinic where Hollywood Actor the Late Patrick Swayze was undergoing chemotherapy," as the media puts a positive spin on marketing Chemical  -  Therapy.  Steve Jobs is having foreign mad-made chemicals pumped directly into his bloodstream instead of using the cancer curing properties of high concentrations from Cannabis oil extracts.  Cannabis is illegal so it MUST be bad.  :Drinks some beer of man-made ethyl alcohol:

Have people stopped questioning reality?  Seriously, the only viable competition must live on strong or else M$ will likely become one of the biggest monopolies of all time.  I wonder if Bill Gates got cancer, would he use Chemical  -  Therapy.
Title: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:08:21
Get it now.
(http://www.toptenreviews.com/i/rev/misc/articles/7443/a-brief-history-8.jpg)
(http://www.toptenreviews.com/i/rev/misc/articles/7443/a-brief-history-8.jpg)
(http://www.toptenreviews.com/i/rev/misc/articles/7443/a-brief-history-8.jpg)
(http://www.toptenreviews.com/i/rev/misc/articles/7443/a-brief-history-8.jpg)
(http://www.toptenreviews.com/i/rev/misc/articles/7443/a-brief-history-8.jpg)
(http://www.toptenreviews.com/i/rev/misc/articles/7443/a-brief-history-8.jpg)
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Zeal on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:10:44
OMG you're back!  ;D
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: asdfjkl36 on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:12:57
Can i upgrade from Vista?
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: iLLucionist on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:20:27
I still have the original win 98 retail CD and STILL know the key by memory.. Oh the joy of reinstalling.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: hwood34 on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:23:23
Oldest I got is XP
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: hashbaz on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:25:22
I may still have 3.11 and 95 on floppies somewhere.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: jwaz on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:29:31
I may still have 3.11 and 95 on floppies somewhere.

I have a monochrome screen NEC laptop with the clip on trackball and 3.1, includes the Star Trek and Pipe Dream games. Unfortunately the Hot Dog Stand theme doesn't look as... radiant on non-color displays :/
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:36:56
I see your Windows 98 and raise you Windows ME!
(http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120615221630/logopedia/images/6/63/Windows_me_logo.jpg)
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Coreda on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:49:29
98 is a POS. XP tho... pretty good.

You can't convert me,  Microsoft Windows!
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Michael on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:52:23
Windows NT or GTFO.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: fohat.digs on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:56:30
For me, the great releases were:

DOS 2.15, 2.5, 3.3, and 6.22

Windows 95, 98, XP, and 7

One day in the next year, when I have the time and money, I will probably go to 8

Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: eth0s on Tue, 06 May 2014, 17:57:38
Windows is for morons.  I'll never give up my Mac.

(http://retrothing.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/05/27/machello.jpg)
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Michael on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:02:39
Windows is for morons.  I'll never give up my Mac.

Show Image
(http://retrothing.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/05/27/machello.jpg)



Actually, Mac OS is Windows for morons. Just pointing out these #trufax for you
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: dorkvader on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:03:23


I'm trying to get a copy of W98 to run some older games and software. Does anyone have a copy the'd be willing to sell? Ideally, I'd install it to a flash drive to boot from.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: eth0s on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:05:57
Windows is for morons.  I'll never give up my Mac.

Show Image
(http://retrothing.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/05/27/machello.jpg)



Actually, Mac OS is Windows for morons. Just pointing out these #trufax for you

Well, Mac OS came out first is all I know.  Maybe when Gates and his minions copied the genius work of Steve Jobs, the software got smarter in its Windows clone-form, I dunno, but Mac OS was first.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: hashbaz on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:12:35


I'm trying to get a copy of W98 to run some older games and software. Does anyone have a copy the'd be willing to sell? Ideally, I'd install it to a flash drive to boot from.

Pretty sure I have my old disc and serial number somewhere.  You're welcome to it if it will be of use to you.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:15:04
Got my Win98 disk sitting on a CD spool somewhere around here... might actually go look for it now, just in light of this thread...
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Michael on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:18:22
Windows is for morons.  I'll never give up my Mac.

Show Image
(http://retrothing.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/05/27/machello.jpg)



Actually, Mac OS is Windows for morons. Just pointing out these #trufax for you

Well, Mac OS came out first is all I know.  Maybe when Gates and his minions copied the genius work of Steve Jobs, the software got smarter in its Windows clone-form, I dunno, but Mac OS was first.


Oh you mean the OS that Steve Jobs took from Xerox. Hue
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: hashbaz on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:19:03
Great artists steal, bro.  It is known.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: fohat.digs on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:19:53
the OS that Steve Jobs took from Xerox.

My understanding is that Palo Alto rules over all.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: fohat.digs on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:23:27
Great artists steal, bro.  It is known.

And/or, as my Industrial Design professor Robert Nichols said in 1973, "It is best to steal from an obscure source."
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: osi on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:39:34
I see your Windows 98 and raise you Windows ME!
Show Image
(http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120615221630/logopedia/images/6/63/Windows_me_logo.jpg)


Windows ME...such a phenomenally designed version. Thank you for reminding me!!
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Michael on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:43:21
Great artists steal, bro.  It is known.

And/or, as my Industrial Design professor Robert Nichols said in 1973, "It is best to steal from an obscure source."


Not too sure Xerox was 'obscure' :P
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Tue, 06 May 2014, 18:48:57
I have installations (some unwrapped) for most Windows between 3.11 and XP lying around at home.  Includes some of the server variants (NT Server and 2000 Server).  Even NT TSE somewhere!
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: YummyTreeSap on Wed, 07 May 2014, 01:05:31
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: baldgye on Wed, 07 May 2014, 03:09:30
Windows is for morons.  I'll never give up my Mac.

Show Image
(http://retrothing.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/05/27/machello.jpg)



Actually, Mac OS is Windows for morons. Just pointing out these #trufax for you

-OH ****
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: iLLucionist on Wed, 07 May 2014, 05:22:37
For me, the great releases were:

DOS 2.15, 2.5, 3.3, and 6.22

Windows 95, 98, XP, and 7

One day in the next year, when I have the time and money, I will probably go to 8

No love for DOS 5.0?
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: fohat.digs on Wed, 07 May 2014, 07:23:28
No love for DOS 5.0?

I never used it. I am not an early adapter and did not buy a new computer from the late 1980s until the mid-1990s.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 07 May 2014, 20:05:15
For me, the great releases were:

DOS 2.15, 2.5, 3.3, and 6.22

Windows 95, 98, XP, and 7

One day in the next year, when I have the time and money, I will probably go to 8

No love for DOS 5.0?

WHO NEEDS DOS 5 WHEN THERE'S WINDOWS 98?
Title: microsoft windows megathread
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 08 May 2014, 15:31:31
I'm getting tired of the current Geekhack logo. You think it's about time we did a refresh and come up with something new that really POPS out a little better?
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: riotonthebay on Thu, 08 May 2014, 16:06:36
(http://i.imgur.com/0J0FlGQ.png)
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 08 May 2014, 16:19:51
Not a bad looking logo!
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: hoggy on Thu, 08 May 2014, 16:28:12
Super, but it needs that little tune...
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: iMav on Thu, 08 May 2014, 18:02:18
I'm getting tired of the current Geekhack logo. You think it's about time we did a refresh and come up with something new that really POPS out a little better?

The current geekhack logo is almost exactly the same as the original one rolled out in 2007.  It's timeless.  Deal.  :)
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: jdcarpe on Thu, 08 May 2014, 18:06:46
I'm getting tired of the current Geekhack logo. You think it's about time we did a refresh and come up with something new that really POPS out a little better?

The current geekhack logo is almost exactly the same as the original one rolled out in 2007.  It's timeless.  Deal.  :)

Thus is it written, and thus it shall be.

So sayeth iMav.
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: rowdy on Thu, 08 May 2014, 18:37:42
I'm getting tired of the current Geekhack logo. You think it's about time we did a refresh and come up with something new that really POPS out a little better?

The current geekhack logo is almost exactly the same as the original one rolled out in 2007.  It's timeless.  Deal.  :)

Thus is it written, and thus it shall be.

So sayeth iMav.

Amen :)
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: mashby on Thu, 08 May 2014, 18:45:36
(http://l.mashby.com/oV4R+)
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: Puddsy on Thu, 08 May 2014, 19:17:08
I'm getting tired of the current Geekhack logo. You think it's about time we did a refresh and come up with something new that really POPS out a little better?

The current geekhack logo is almost exactly the same as the original one rolled out in 2007.  It's timeless.  Deal.  :)

The Lord hath spoken

So it shall be
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 09 May 2014, 08:39:58
Here's a logo that might work a bit better on this site:
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: iLLucionist on Fri, 09 May 2014, 18:59:44
For me, the great releases were:

DOS 2.15, 2.5, 3.3, and 6.22

Windows 95, 98, XP, and 7

One day in the next year, when I have the time and money, I will probably go to 8

No love for DOS 5.0?

WHO NEEDS DOS 5 WHEN THERE'S WINDOWS 98?

Well, Windows 98, being the same garbage that Windows 95 was, only less BSODs and slightly less reinstalling IMHO, made me more question why Windows 98 when there's also DOS :p At that time, I liked System 7 and System 8 more than Windows 95/98.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 12:05:22
GUESS WHAT. IT'S BEEN THREE YEARS AND INTERNET EXPLORER 6 STILL ISN'T DEAD. IT WILL BE IMMORTAL!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 15 May 2014, 12:06:10
GUESS WHAT. IT'S BEEN THREE YEARS AND INTERNET EXPLORER 6 STILL ISN'T DEAD. IT WILL BE IMMORTAL!

I'm pretty sure IE6 died with WinXP...
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 12:07:56
GUESS WHAT. IT'S BEEN THREE YEARS AND INTERNET EXPLORER 6 STILL ISN'T DEAD. IT WILL BE IMMORTAL!

I'm pretty sure IE6 died with WinXP...

No it didn't. It lived on. And Windows XP didn't die either. NEITHER OF THEM WILL EVER DIE!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 15 May 2014, 12:08:48
GUESS WHAT. IT'S BEEN THREE YEARS AND INTERNET EXPLORER 6 STILL ISN'T DEAD. IT WILL BE IMMORTAL!

I'm pretty sure IE6 died with WinXP...

No it didn't. It lived on. And Windows XP didn't die either. NEITHER OF THEM WILL EVER DIE!

Sent from WinXP.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 12:10:51
GUESS WHAT. IT'S BEEN THREE YEARS AND INTERNET EXPLORER 6 STILL ISN'T DEAD. IT WILL BE IMMORTAL!

I'm pretty sure IE6 died with WinXP...

No it didn't. It lived on. And Windows XP didn't die either. NEITHER OF THEM WILL EVER DIE!

Sent from WinXP.

Windows XP IS STILL ALIVE!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 15 May 2014, 12:37:17
internet explorer sucks
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Novus on Thu, 15 May 2014, 13:06:24
As a time traveler if I had to choose between Netscape and IE - I'd choose IE.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: jwaz on Thu, 15 May 2014, 13:13:39
As a time traveler if I had to choose between Netscape and IE - I'd choose IE.

Lynx
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: dustinhxc on Thu, 15 May 2014, 13:14:09
I only use IE to test websites and I cringe the entire time.  :mad:
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 13:50:10
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 13:50:30
I only use IE to test websites and I cringe the entire time.  :mad:

THAT'E BECAUSE YOU'RE USING INTERNET EXPLORER 7. YOU NEED TO USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 15 May 2014, 13:55:47
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
[attachimg=1]
internet explorer still sucks though
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 13:56:10
For me, the great releases were:

DOS 2.15, 2.5, 3.3, and 6.22

Windows 95, 98, XP, and 7

One day in the next year, when I have the time and money, I will probably go to 8

No love for DOS 5.0?

WHO NEEDS DOS 5 WHEN THERE'S WINDOWS 98?

Well, Windows 98, being the same garbage that Windows 95 was, only less BSODs and slightly less reinstalling IMHO, made me more question why Windows 98 when there's also DOS :p At that time, I liked System 7 and System 8 more than Windows 95/98.

Windows 98 is not garbage. You are making a fool out of yourself by denying settled science.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:01:48
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: dustinhxc on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:04:31
I only use IE to test websites and I cringe the entire time.  :mad:

THAT'E BECAUSE YOU'RE USING INTERNET EXPLORER 7. YOU NEED TO USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6.

 :))
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:05:54
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Novus on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:06:37
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That's because you've never resorted to torture.
Not that i condone strapping somebody to a chair and forcing them to use a Mac.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Zeal on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:07:04
IE11. That is all.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:07:16
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:07:48
IE11. That is all.

No. It is not. IE6 is better than IE11. It's just a simple law of nature. Learn some physics!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Novus on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:08:28
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

Everything is flawed
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:08:33
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:09:05
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Novus on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:09:52
Deploy the golden PSP.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:10:00
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Novus on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:17:25
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
You'very been working for HYDRA from the very start.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:18:34
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:19:48
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Novus on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:21:40
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:23:11
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
HEIL H-
HAIL HYDRA.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:25:25
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
HEIL H-
HAIL HYDRA.

Hail INTERNET EXPLORER 6.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:26:17
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
HEIL H-
HAIL HYDRA.

Hail INTERNET EXPLORER 6.
We have a worshipping room for the IE Cult. Ignore the showerheads.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:27:31
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
HEIL H-
HAIL HYDRA.

HAIL THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:28:00
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
HEIL H-
HAIL HYDRA.

Hail INTERNET EXPLORER 6.
We have a worshipping room for the IE Cult. Ignore the showerheads.

AND THAT ROOM IS CALLED PLANET EARTH. SO MANY PEOPLE USE INTERNET EXPLORER THAT ONE SMALL ROOM CANNOT FIT THEM ALL!

YOU NEED TO GET WINDOWS 98 AND START USING MSIE6 TODAY!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: JPG on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:52:44
IE6 has been dead for years, it just doesn't know it.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:54:06
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
HEIL H-
HAIL HYDRA.

Hail INTERNET EXPLORER 6.
We have a worshipping room for the IE Cult. Ignore the showerheads.

AND THAT ROOM IS CALLED PLANET EARTH. SO MANY PEOPLE USE INTERNET EXPLORER THAT ONE SMALL ROOM CANNOT FIT THEM ALL!

YOU NEED TO GET WINDOWS 98 AND START USING MSIE6 TODAY!
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Malphas on Thu, 15 May 2014, 14:55:04
(http://www.huguesjohnson.com/win2k/win95vpc_gallery_weezer.jpg)

Halcyon days.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Novus on Thu, 15 May 2014, 15:07:03
Windows 3.0 or GTFO
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 18:05:01
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
HEIL H-
HAIL HYDRA.

Hail INTERNET EXPLORER 6.
We have a worshipping room for the IE Cult. Ignore the showerheads.

AND THAT ROOM IS CALLED PLANET EARTH. SO MANY PEOPLE USE INTERNET EXPLORER THAT ONE SMALL ROOM CANNOT FIT THEM ALL!

YOU NEED TO GET WINDOWS 98 AND START USING MSIE6 TODAY!
(Attachment Link)

You just simply don't understand. You unfortunately do not appear to be adequately educated in the world of computing. Everybody knows that Internet Explorer 6 is immortal. You can't deny it!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: noisyturtle on Thu, 15 May 2014, 18:08:51
They don't even use IE over at Microsoft. Most people have Chrome on their work computers.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 15 May 2014, 18:18:35
internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
HEIL H-
HAIL HYDRA.

Hail INTERNET EXPLORER 6.
We have a worshipping room for the IE Cult. Ignore the showerheads.

AND THAT ROOM IS CALLED PLANET EARTH. SO MANY PEOPLE USE INTERNET EXPLORER THAT ONE SMALL ROOM CANNOT FIT THEM ALL!

YOU NEED TO GET WINDOWS 98 AND START USING MSIE6 TODAY!
(Attachment Link)

You just simply don't understand. You unfortunately do not appear to be adequately educated in the world of computing. Everybody knows that Internet Explorer 6 is immortal. You can't deny it!
shut up loser
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 19:19:11
IE6 has been dead for years, it just doesn't know it.

internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
(Attachment Link)
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
HEIL H-
HAIL HYDRA.

Hail INTERNET EXPLORER 6.
We have a worshipping room for the IE Cult. Ignore the showerheads.

AND THAT ROOM IS CALLED PLANET EARTH. SO MANY PEOPLE USE INTERNET EXPLORER THAT ONE SMALL ROOM CANNOT FIT THEM ALL!

YOU NEED TO GET WINDOWS 98 AND START USING MSIE6 TODAY!
(Attachment Link)

You just simply don't understand. You unfortunately do not appear to be adequately educated in the world of computing. Everybody knows that Internet Explorer 6 is immortal. You can't deny it!
shut up loser

Who do you think you are calling me a loser? I'm the one winning the game here. You're just too far behind the train to notice.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 19:20:51
Windows 3.0 or GTFO

WINDOWS 98
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Belfong on Thu, 15 May 2014, 19:28:01
autoexec.bat
config.sys

Oh my goodness!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 15 May 2014, 19:34:44
IE6 has been dead for years, it just doesn't know it.

internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
[attachimg=1]
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
HEIL H-
HAIL HYDRA.

Hail INTERNET EXPLORER 6.
We have a worshipping room for the IE Cult. Ignore the showerheads.

AND THAT ROOM IS CALLED PLANET EARTH. SO MANY PEOPLE USE INTERNET EXPLORER THAT ONE SMALL ROOM CANNOT FIT THEM ALL!

YOU NEED TO GET WINDOWS 98 AND START USING MSIE6 TODAY!
[attachimg=1]

You just simply don't understand. You unfortunately do not appear to be adequately educated in the world of computing. Everybody knows that Internet Explorer 6 is immortal. You can't deny it!
shut up loser

Who do you think you are calling me a loser? I'm the one winning the game here. You're just too far behind the train to notice.
and you're riding a horse carriage
and the horses are dead

(you're beating a dead horse, is what I'm saying)
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: rowdy on Thu, 15 May 2014, 19:38:58
Riding around in a brougham - classic.

The slower pace of life is something that most people miss out on these days.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 19:41:11
IE6 has been dead for years, it just doesn't know it.

internet explorer sucks


NO IT DOESN'T. ANYBODY WHO SAYS THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT.
[attachimg=1]
internet explorer still sucks though

Eventually you'll learn that, no matter how much you try, you will never convince MW of this fact.

That is because Internet Explorer is fundamentally superior to all other internet browsers on the planet. I am simply an acknowledger of the truth.

You obviously never read that article explaining how every single version of Internet Explorer came with a fundamental security flaw.

I read it, but it's just a lie. Satan is just trying to sabotage the reputation of this beautiful piece of software that we know of as Internet Explorer 6.

All hail Satan. Lord of the Better Web Browsers.

I WOULD RATHER USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6 THAN WORSHIP THE DEVIL!

Weak sauce.
You will worship your one true god and see the light.
Open your eyes.
hail satan
banish ie

I will stay on the good side. I'll let you devil worshippers use Netscape. I'll take MSIE6 for myself!

Hail HYDRA
HEIL H-
HAIL HYDRA.

Hail INTERNET EXPLORER 6.
We have a worshipping room for the IE Cult. Ignore the showerheads.

AND THAT ROOM IS CALLED PLANET EARTH. SO MANY PEOPLE USE INTERNET EXPLORER THAT ONE SMALL ROOM CANNOT FIT THEM ALL!

YOU NEED TO GET WINDOWS 98 AND START USING MSIE6 TODAY!
[attachimg=1]

You just simply don't understand. You unfortunately do not appear to be adequately educated in the world of computing. Everybody knows that Internet Explorer 6 is immortal. You can't deny it!
shut up loser

Who do you think you are calling me a loser? I'm the one winning the game here. You're just too far behind the train to notice.
and you're riding a horse carriage
and the horses are dead

(you're beating a dead horse, is what I'm saying)

But at least I'm not beating Internet Explorer 6. Internet Explorer 6 will never be a dead horse, you know...
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 15 May 2014, 19:41:49
Riding around in a brougham - classic.

The slower pace of life is something that most people miss out on these days.

Windows 98 on a Pentium I will admit is a fine way to slow things down a little....but then it leaves one with time to contemplate life a bit anyways! : )
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 15 May 2014, 19:47:12
and windows 98 and ie is a great way to slow down your computer
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 15 May 2014, 19:50:29
and windows 98 and ie is a great way to slow down your computer

Win98SE actually runs decent on a Pentium III. But that doesn't mean I'd actually use it. Or IE6.

*PROUDLY BROUGHT TO YOU BY WINDOWS 8 AND GOOGLE CHROME*
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 15 May 2014, 19:55:14
and windows 98 and ie is a great way to slow down your computer

Win98SE actually runs decent on a Pentium III. But that doesn't mean I'd actually use it. Or IE6.

*PROUDLY BROUGHT TO YOU BY WINDOWS 8 AND GOOGLE CHROME*
Windows 8 and Chrome 4 life


until a new windows comes out
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 15 May 2014, 20:00:28
and windows 98 and ie is a great way to slow down your computer

Win98SE actually runs decent on a Pentium III. But that doesn't mean I'd actually use it. Or IE6.

*PROUDLY BROUGHT TO YOU BY WINDOWS 8 AND GOOGLE CHROME*
Windows 8 and Chrome 4 life


until a new windows comes out

Which will probably be sometime soonish, I would imagine...

Win9.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Novus on Thu, 15 May 2014, 20:02:41
Once mac and or linux gets better gaming support I'll leave windows forever ....

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH that was funny.

No but seriously wouldn't it be cool if you could build your own PC and then install Mac on it.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 15 May 2014, 20:10:26
No but seriously wouldn't it be cool if you could build your own PC and then install Mac on it.

Umm... you can.

Ever heard of a Hackintosh? An iPC?
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 15 May 2014, 20:10:46
Once mac and or linux gets better gaming support I'll leave windows forever ....

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH that was funny.

No but seriously wouldn't it be cool if you could build your own PC and then install Mac on it.

jesus I've been staring at the middle gif in your sig all day and I have no idea what it is
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 15 May 2014, 20:12:27
Once mac and or linux gets better gaming support I'll leave windows forever ....

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH that was funny.

No but seriously wouldn't it be cool if you could build your own PC and then install Mac on it.

jesus I've been staring at the middle gif in your sig all day and I have no idea what it is

oh good, so I'm not the only one...

Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: noisyturtle on Thu, 15 May 2014, 21:09:00
They all seem to be Dr. Who gifs, and I think that's Amy. No idea what the reference is though. It's the second one I can't wrap my mind around, no idea what's going on there.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: ideus on Thu, 15 May 2014, 22:34:58
Windows is for morons.  I'll never give up my Mac.

Show Image
(http://retrothing.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/05/27/machello.jpg)



Actually, Mac OS is Windows for morons. Just pointing out these #trufax for you

Well, Mac OS came out first is all I know.  Maybe when Gates and his minions copied the genius work of Steve Jobs, the software got smarter in its Windows clone-form, I dunno, but Mac OS was first.


Oh you mean the OS that Steve Jobs took from Xerox. Hue

Aw now copycats are geniuses? I admire the size of Mr. Jobs' ego, and passion for his own thinking, but I would not call him a genius.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: digi on Thu, 15 May 2014, 22:52:44
Windows 98 was actually pretty buggy, now Windows 98 SE was l33t.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: vasconqs on Fri, 16 May 2014, 03:20:16
(http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/win311logo.gif)
Windows 3.11 on top of DOS, best damn thing ever. You could actually learn how the filesystem worked, just by using it. You had A:, you had C:, and if you were lucky you had D:. If you were unlucky you got B: instead. Those big-ass floppy Bs...

Now I'm like, "How is My Computer a folder, and in which drive is My Desktop?"
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Fri, 16 May 2014, 03:42:18
AFAIK I've watched all the episodes with Karen Gillan (Amy), and I haven't seen anything like this. It doesn't really look like her either.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Fri, 16 May 2014, 05:45:41
The first network I setup was with Windows for Workgroups 3.11.

It was magical because it all just seemed to work.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 16 May 2014, 13:59:25
There was always something magical about Windows....even in the early years!
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: baldgye on Fri, 16 May 2014, 14:01:04
There was always something magical about Windows....even in the early years!

It will come back, soon as WinFS is implemented!



hahahah
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: physicsmajor on Fri, 16 May 2014, 18:28:07
I see your Windows 98 and raise you Windows ME!
Show Image
(http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120615221630/logopedia/images/6/63/Windows_me_logo.jpg)


The first rule of Windows ME is: nobody ever speaks about Windows ME for any reason.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: smknjoe on Fri, 16 May 2014, 18:48:51
I see your Windows 98 and raise you Windows ME!
Show Image
(http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120615221630/logopedia/images/6/63/Windows_me_logo.jpg)


The first rule of Windows ME is: nobody ever speaks about Windows ME for any reason.

That's probably the rule around the Redmond campus. ;)
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Zeal on Fri, 16 May 2014, 19:19:25
I see your Windows 98 and raise you Windows ME!
Show Image
(http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120615221630/logopedia/images/6/63/Windows_me_logo.jpg)


The first rule of Windows ME is: nobody ever speaks about Windows ME for any reason.

I remember when I had to use Windows ME... - shudders- :-X
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 16 May 2014, 19:39:59
Did you know that Doctor Who uses Internet Explorer 6?
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Zeal on Fri, 16 May 2014, 20:09:41
Did you know that Doctor Who uses Internet Explorer 6?

Prove it.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Novus on Fri, 16 May 2014, 20:45:13
Did you know that Doctor Who uses Internet Explorer 6?

Prove it.

That's an improper usage of the lexical ambiguity.
It should be did you know the Doctor uses Internet Explorer 6.

[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: physicsmajor on Fri, 16 May 2014, 20:59:13
clip ...

I remember when I had to use Windows ME... - shudders- :-X

I fear I've unintentionally broken the rule.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Novus on Fri, 16 May 2014, 21:02:13
NOBODY DISSES WINDOWS ME.
YOU HEAR ME?
HOW ELSE WOULD WE HAVE SURVIVED YTK?

Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 17 May 2014, 15:27:05
Did you know that Doctor Who uses Internet Explorer 6?

Prove it.

Prove that the Doctor doesn't.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Zeal on Sat, 17 May 2014, 16:22:34
Did you know that Doctor Who uses Internet Explorer 6?

Prove it.

Prove that the Doctor doesn't.

I don't have to, as I'm not the one stating that the Doctor does! :cool:
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: C5Allroad on Sun, 18 May 2014, 00:40:47
I bet he's on Chrome and responding to use saying that IE 6 is the ****.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Zeal on Sun, 18 May 2014, 01:35:30
I bet he's on Chrome and responding to use saying that IE 6 is the ****.

You obviously haven't seen MW's collection of PCs... :))
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: feizor on Sun, 18 May 2014, 02:33:11
I have to use IE 6 at work because our intranet was built on it and doesn't work on any other browsers.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: rowdy on Sun, 18 May 2014, 03:49:37
I have to use IE 6 at work because our intranet was built on it and doesn't work on any other browsers.

That's sad :(
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Sun, 18 May 2014, 04:09:48
I have to use IE 6 at work because our intranet was built on it and doesn't work on any other browsers.
"hey boss! i ****ing quit"
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Elrick on Sun, 18 May 2014, 04:37:13
Did you know that Doctor Who uses Internet Explorer 6?

That is an absolute abysmal statement trying desperately to make a link with that gawd awful piece of software dross with a legend in Sci-Fi.

Shame on you Gates's Warped Child, you shall never encourage anyone here on Geekhack to be enslaved to Microsoft or their loathsome browser.  It really pisses me off when you keep on dragging a dead carcass down the street and telling every stranger how sweet it smells  >:( .

IE 6 is now dead, good riddance to bad rubbish.  Now to turn it over in the compost bin so that it gets re-absorbed back into it's own rot  :thumb: .
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: rowdy on Sun, 18 May 2014, 04:38:42
I have to use IE 6 at work because our intranet was built on it and doesn't work on any other browsers.
"hey boss! i ****ing quit"

"Hey, Boss, I can rewrite this in something portable across modern browsers!"
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Novus on Sun, 18 May 2014, 04:40:28
Internet Explorer is an instrument of the Daleks.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Sun, 18 May 2014, 05:21:49
internet explorer more like

****
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Belfong on Sun, 18 May 2014, 08:19:18
Y2K, you mean..
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 20 May 2014, 09:34:23
aNY MORE THOUGHTS ON THIS LOGO?
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 23 May 2014, 08:39:49
I survived Y2K with Windows 3.1. That was a good OS. Windows 98 is a good choice too if you're getting ready for Y2K.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: baldgye on Fri, 23 May 2014, 09:00:25
YTK is what people who didn't survive Y2K call it
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 24 June 2014, 13:23:12
YTK is what people who didn't survive Y2K call it

But I survived Y2K in style by effectively utilizing innovative Windows 98 technology. Where's yours?
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Lain1911 on Tue, 24 June 2014, 23:22:51
The only reason to go back! But why go back when there's Dosbox?

Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: baldgye on Wed, 25 June 2014, 07:07:28
YTK is what people who didn't survive Y2K call it

But I survived Y2K in style by effectively utilizing innovative Windows 98 technology. Where's yours?

Trapped in Zip Discs
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 25 June 2014, 09:20:43
YTK is what people who didn't survive Y2K call it

But I survived Y2K in style by effectively utilizing innovative Windows 98 technology. Where's yours?

Trapped in Zip Discs

Then you better get yourself a ZIP drive! Don't let your data get trapped.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: iLLucionist on Thu, 26 June 2014, 04:41:20
For me, the great releases were:

DOS 2.15, 2.5, 3.3, and 6.22

Windows 95, 98, XP, and 7

One day in the next year, when I have the time and money, I will probably go to 8

No love for DOS 5.0?

WHO NEEDS DOS 5 WHEN THERE'S WINDOWS 98?

Well, Windows 98, being the same garbage that Windows 95 was, only less BSODs and slightly less reinstalling IMHO, made me more question why Windows 98 when there's also DOS :p At that time, I liked System 7 and System 8 more than Windows 95/98.

Windows 98 is not garbage. You are making a fool out of yourself by denying settled science.

Mehh.. Windows 98 SE was alright, but I had really really weird experiences with Windows 98 (of course, YMMV), especially system/driver detection (on different machines). I have seen multiple times where Windows 98 would install different drivers / detect different hardware when I reinstalled Windows 98. That was really really weird. And the only way to fix that was to reinstall again.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Lurch on Thu, 26 June 2014, 09:45:27
(http://imgur.com/FMVEG7b.jpg)
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: iLLucionist on Thu, 26 June 2014, 09:47:22
Show Image
(http://imgur.com/FMVEG7b.jpg)


Ahh the memories.. I had Win95 on 16 floppies if I remember correctly (Win98 on CD).
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Lurch on Thu, 26 June 2014, 10:03:52
Show Image
(http://imgur.com/FMVEG7b.jpg)


Ahh the memories.. I had Win95 on 16 floppies if I remember correctly (Win98 on CD).

Oh yes, good times(?). ;D

Just found this as well:

(http://imgur.com/8d7LIKk.jpg)

Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 26 June 2014, 12:50:26
Show Image
(http://imgur.com/FMVEG7b.jpg)


Ahh the memories.. I had Win95 on 16 floppies if I remember correctly (Win98 on CD).

Oh yes, good times(?). ;D

Just found this as well:

Show Image
(http://imgur.com/8d7LIKk.jpg)




Wonderful software there! And an excellent choice of medium as well.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Lurch on Thu, 26 June 2014, 13:55:56
Show Image
(http://imgur.com/FMVEG7b.jpg)


Ahh the memories.. I had Win95 on 16 floppies if I remember correctly (Win98 on CD).

Oh yes, good times(?). ;D

Just found this as well:

Show Image
(http://imgur.com/8d7LIKk.jpg)




Wonderful software there! And an excellent choice of medium as well.

Thanks!
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: iLLucionist on Thu, 26 June 2014, 16:34:07
Show Image
(http://imgur.com/FMVEG7b.jpg)


Ahh the memories.. I had Win95 on 16 floppies if I remember correctly (Win98 on CD).

Oh yes, good times(?). ;D

Just found this as well:

Show Image
(http://imgur.com/8d7LIKk.jpg)


Mmm nice. I had QuickBasic 4.5 on floppies... it was the exact same design, exact for the red triangle being blue. I also had the QuickBasic 4.5 manual, still have it somewhere in some box. The good old days where they would give you bibles full of documentation (like Visual Basic 5.0 Learning Edition Deluxe, which was a cassette of books).
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: zeroni13 on Sat, 12 July 2014, 03:02:13
I'll just leave this here:

Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: rowdy on Thu, 24 July 2014, 18:03:05
Internet Explorer vulnerabilities increase 100% (http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=17158)
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 24 July 2014, 18:24:28
Firefox + NoScript + Adblock...   nothing gets past this...    UNLESS you're begging for viruses on some pr0n or free game download site..
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 24 July 2014, 18:31:59
lol
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 24 July 2014, 21:30:57
Internet Explorer is an instrument of the Daleks.


Those who do not use it will be exterminated.

Which, of course, is why you should use Internet Explorer.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: rowdy on Fri, 08 August 2014, 05:37:05
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/07/stay-up-to-date-with-internet-explorer.aspx
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Mon, 11 August 2014, 11:48:52
Guess what? Internet Explorer 6 is still alive!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Novus on Mon, 11 August 2014, 12:47:40
Exterminate!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Mon, 11 August 2014, 13:00:12
Exterminate!

Exterminate the macs.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Grim Fandango on Mon, 11 August 2014, 13:10:22
Firefox + NoScript + Adblock...   nothing gets past this...    UNLESS you're begging for viruses on some pr0n or free game download site..

This is the same thing I used. Checking out Chrome now , but it does not have no-script (I think, should look it up).
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Novus on Mon, 11 August 2014, 15:58:32
Firefox + NoScript + Adblock...   nothing gets past this...    UNLESS you're begging for viruses on some pr0n or free game download site..

Nobody on geekhack surfs porn okay.
Nobody likes to get their beloved keyboard dirty.
mkay
get with it.
gosh
*sigh, unzips
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Elrick on Mon, 11 August 2014, 21:33:56
Firefox + NoScript + Adblock...   nothing gets past this...    UNLESS you're begging for viruses on some pr0n or free game download site..

Nobody on geekhack surfs porn okay.
Nobody likes to get their beloved keyboard dirty.
mkay
get with it.
gosh
*sigh, unzips

Don't waste your time watching other people having fun, get involved and get busy with your significant other.

You've got all the porno temptations with her and why waste your time surfing the web for it?  Only use the web to BUY, move money around and book holidays, that's about it.

Also forget about ever using IE because it's just nasty junk way past it's usefulness  8) .
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 12 August 2014, 09:35:50
Firefox + NoScript + Adblock...   nothing gets past this...    UNLESS you're begging for viruses on some pr0n or free game download site..

Nobody on geekhack surfs porn okay.
Nobody likes to get their beloved keyboard dirty.
mkay
get with it.
gosh
*sigh, unzips

Don't waste your time watching other people having fun, get involved and get busy with your significant other.

You've got all the porno temptations with her and why waste your time surfing the web for it?  Only use the web to BUY, move money around and book holidays, that's about it.

Also forget about ever using IE because it's just nasty junk way past it's usefulness  8) .

YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY WRONG! INTERNET EXPLORER IS THE BEST BROWSER EVER MADE. IT IS THE ONLY ONE TO FEATURE AWARD WINNING MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY, AND IS DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR WINDOWS, WHICH IS BY FAR THE MOST SUPERIOR OPERATING SYSTEM. IF YOU WANT TO USE A GOOD QUALITY KEYBOARD, WHY WOULDN'T YOU WANT TO USE A GOOD QUALITY INTERNET BROWSING SOFTWARE? FOR THAT REASON, I FEEL THAT YOU HAVE DONE THE WONDERFUL INTERNET EXPLORER 6 A GREAT INJUSTICE. IT IS BY FAR THE HIGHEST QUALITY INTERNET BROWSER EVER CREATED, AND HERE YOU ARE INSULTING THIS GLORIOUS FAMILY OF PRODUCTS. SHAME ON YOU!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Tue, 12 August 2014, 09:36:55
IE6 died with WinXP.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 12 August 2014, 09:39:57
IE6 died with WinXP.

AND GUESS WHAT? THEY'RE BOTH ALIVE!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Tue, 12 August 2014, 10:01:38
IE6 died with WinXP.

AND GUESS WHAT? THEY'RE BOTH ALIVE!

But are they? Are they really???

WERE THEY EVER EVEN ALIVE TO BEGIN WITH???????
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 12 August 2014, 10:24:55
IE6 died with WinXP.

AND GUESS WHAT? THEY'RE BOTH ALIVE!

But are they? Are they really???

WERE THEY EVER EVEN ALIVE TO BEGIN WITH???????

They are alive because I say they are alive.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Tue, 12 August 2014, 10:30:35
life
līf
(noun)
1.
the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death.



By this definition, IE6 must be able to die in order to be considered "alive".

You can't have it both ways.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 12 August 2014, 13:44:09
life
līf
(noun)
1.
the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death.



By this definition, IE6 must be able to die in order to be considered "alive".

You can't have it both ways.

Internet Explorer 6 is certified organic. And due to its inherent immortal nature, it will be alive forever.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: smarmar on Wed, 01 October 2014, 22:35:08
Windows 98 was actually pretty buggy, now Windows 98 SE was l33t.
Win98SE is where Ms should have said "Whoa! Hey, guys just.....Whoa! Everybody retire right now 'cause we got it. We Got this! It's over. We got this thing."
I use it for me olde gaming rig to run 90s-era pc games a la Daggerfall, Thief, Dark Forces, Myst, Star Flight, et al.
Title: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 24 October 2014, 10:37:22
Seems like Islamic extremism/terrorism has been on the rise in the past couple years. Recent incidents such as the Canadian parliament shooting, ISIL terrorism in western Iraq and eastern Syria, 9/11/2012 U. S. Embassy bombing, and the Boston Marathon bombing come to mind. What are your thoughts on this?

I personally think that if the United States had kept some troops in Iraq, the whole Islamic State fiasco would've largely been prevented.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: jdcarpe on Fri, 24 October 2014, 10:38:59
I personally think that if the United States had kept some troops in Iraq, the whole Islamic State fiasco would've largely been prevented.

THANKS, OBAMA!
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: hwood34 on Fri, 24 October 2014, 10:40:05
Wow nice flame bait. Have fun with the ****fest
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 24 October 2014, 10:41:45
I personally think that if the United States had kept some troops in Iraq, the whole Islamic State fiasco would've largely been prevented.

THANKS, OBAMA!

I do believe that the Obama administration is largely responsible for the crisis in Iraq and Syria. Many others across the political spectrum, even George W. Bush, warned that a complete withdrawl of troops from Iraq would leave a dangerous power vacuum. But the Obama camp stuck with their ideological goals and withdrew the troops anyway. And look at what's filled the power vacuum. Now we've got a vicious terrorist organization that gets over $1 million a day from black market oil sales to deal with.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: SpAmRaY on Fri, 24 October 2014, 10:54:37
I personally think that if the United States had kept some troops in Iraq, the whole Islamic State fiasco would've largely been prevented.

THANKS, OBAMA!

Isn't change great! :facepalm:
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: fohat.digs on Fri, 24 October 2014, 10:59:49
even George W. Bush, warned that a complete withdrawl of troops from Iraq would leave a dangerous power vacuum.

Clearly, you have gone full retard.

If Bush Jr had not totally lied, we would never have gone into Iraq in the first place.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: SpAmRaY on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:03:42
even George W. Bush, warned that a complete withdrawl of troops from Iraq would leave a dangerous power vacuum.

Clearly, you have gone full retard.

If Bush Jr had not totally lied, we would never have gone into Iraq in the first place.

Didn't they just come out with news reports that they actually found WMD's and just neglected to mention it?
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: hwood34 on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:05:43
even George W. Bush, warned that a complete withdrawl of troops from Iraq would leave a dangerous power vacuum.

Clearly, you have gone full retard.

If Bush Jr had not totally lied, we would never have gone into Iraq in the first place.

Didn't they just come out with news reports that they actually found WMD's and just neglected to mention it?
they found old chemical weapons used in the iraq/iran war, and completely accidentally
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: Flyersfan1 on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:08:00
even George W. Bush, warned that a complete withdrawl of troops from Iraq would leave a dangerous power vacuum.

Clearly, you have gone full retard.

If Bush Jr had not totally lied, we would never have gone into Iraq in the first place.

Didn't they just come out with news reports that they actually found WMD's and just neglected to mention it?
they found old chemical weapons used in the iraq/iran war, and completely accidentally
That's news to me, could you link something? Not saying it's not true, just curious.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: hwood34 on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:13:03
even George W. Bush, warned that a complete withdrawl of troops from Iraq would leave a dangerous power vacuum.

Clearly, you have gone full retard.

If Bush Jr had not totally lied, we would never have gone into Iraq in the first place.

Didn't they just come out with news reports that they actually found WMD's and just neglected to mention it?
they found old chemical weapons used in the iraq/iran war, and completely accidentally
That's news to me, could you link something? Not saying it's not true, just curious.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/10/14/world/middleeast/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html
This one is more on the soldiers that were told to keep quiet about the chemicals, which were made with the help of the US
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: Flyersfan1 on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:13:47
Thanks!  :D
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: baldgye on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:15:09
This is the net result of what happens when you invade and depose the leader of one of the biggest nations in what is essentially the dark ages...
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:20:52
even George W. Bush, warned that a complete withdrawl of troops from Iraq would leave a dangerous power vacuum.

Clearly, you have gone full retard.

If Bush Jr had not totally lied, we would never have gone into Iraq in the first place.

Bush may have not been the greatest president ever, but his replacement is even worse. You're neglecting to acknowledge the fact that if Obama did not have all the troops withdrawn from Iraq in 2011, then the IS situation would have been largely prevented. "Bush's lies" are no excuse for Obama's poor decision and leadership.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: dante on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:21:54
I don't remember what movie it was - maybe '7 years in tibet'?  Anyway when I was younger I remember a scene in that movie where the Chinese came out and declared "Religion is Poison."  I thought that was rather harsh at the time but now that I'm getting older I'm starting to agree.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:23:23
I don't remember what movie it was - maybe '7 years in tibet'?  Anyway when I was younger I remember a scene in that movie where the Chinese came out and declared "Religion is Poison."  I thought that was rather harsh but now that I'm getting older I'm starting to agree.

I don't think religion itself is poison--after all, the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful people. But it's these evil, deranged, mentally ill people who use religion as an excuse for their terror who are the real poison.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: fohat.digs on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:31:51
"Bush's lies" are no excuse for Obama's poor decision and leadership.

Obama is doing an exemplary job at shoveling out the latrine that Bush left for him.
 
His mistake is that he is too nice and has not done nearly as much as he should have.

PS - Religion is not a poison, it is a deadly virus.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:41:35
We went into Iraq to steal oil, what did you expect would happen.

Now that the heist has gone sour, and the occupation force becoming much to financially burdensome to sustain we have no choice but to end our latest imperialist campaign. If anything blame the capitalists who said they were rich enough but turned out to be all leverage and no substance.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: baldgye on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:42:04
"Bush's lies" are no excuse for Obama's poor decision and leadership.

Obama is doing an exemplary job at shoveling out the latrine that Bush left for him.
 
His mistake is that he is too nice and has not done nearly as much as he should have.

What do you mean?? He already gave amazing governmental jobs to all those bankers who helped totally **** the western worlds economy!
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:49:57
"Bush's lies" are no excuse for Obama's poor decision and leadership.

Obama is doing an exemplary job at shoveling out the latrine that Bush left for him.
 
His mistake is that he is too nice and has not done nearly as much as he should have.

What do you mean?? He already gave amazing governmental jobs to all those bankers who helped totally **** the western worlds economy!

The bankers did not ffff the economy, equal rights, women's rights, workers rights, union wages, f***** our economy. All these things greatly reduced the profitability of American production, thus evolving our economy into a financial service state with few soldiers and few ignorant enough to die, completing the cycle of contraction of American might.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:51:00
"Bush's lies" are no excuse for Obama's poor decision and leadership.

Obama is doing an exemplary job at shoveling out the latrine that Bush left for him.
 
His mistake is that he is too nice and has not done nearly as much as he should have.

What do you mean?? He already gave amazing governmental jobs to all those bankers who helped totally **** the western worlds economy!

You must be referring to Bill Clinton then. You'll find some interesting things went on during the mid-late 1990's that encouraged the subprime lending boom/bust.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: baldgye on Fri, 24 October 2014, 11:53:42
"Bush's lies" are no excuse for Obama's poor decision and leadership.

Obama is doing an exemplary job at shoveling out the latrine that Bush left for him.
 
His mistake is that he is too nice and has not done nearly as much as he should have.

What do you mean?? He already gave amazing governmental jobs to all those bankers who helped totally **** the western worlds economy!

You must be referring to Bill Clinton then. You'll find some interesting things went on during the mid-late 1990's that encouraged the subprime lending boom/bust.

Maybe I was, who was it that sent money and guns to the IRA again?
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: demik on Fri, 24 October 2014, 12:26:42
religion is just a poison, period.

this is just islams time up to bat. christians and catholics have had their fun.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: iri on Fri, 24 October 2014, 12:27:28
TIL catholics aren't christians!
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: Lurch on Fri, 24 October 2014, 12:31:55
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: paicrai on Fri, 24 October 2014, 13:54:48

United States
ebola
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: Findecanor on Fri, 24 October 2014, 13:54:51
I do believe that the Obama administration is largely responsible for the crisis in Iraq and Syria.
There are many who believe that the uprising in the Arabic countries (Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria) was orchestrated by the CIA ... and in that is true, you can assume that the Obama administration must have OK:d it.

I dunno, but I would not be surprised if that was true. CIA have sometimes given support to groups, who later veer off to pursue their own objectives, that are not always in line with what the US gov. wants. Previous examples of that were Saddam Hussein (who George Bush Sr once called "Our friend in the Middle East") , and then the Taliban.
In fact, the invasion of Afghanistan at the end of 2001 was not originally planned as revenge for the WTC but had already been planned as punishment of the Taliban for severing their ties with the US and not agreeing to a planned oil pipeline through their country. The propaganda machine against the Taliban was already in full swing before 911, and the WTC bombings was very convenient.

You're neglecting to acknowledge the fact that if Obama did not have all the troops withdrawn from Iraq in 2011, then the IS situation would have been largely prevented.
I thinkt that is a simplification. IS (ISIL) started in Syria and then invaded the north of Iraq. USA has never had much of a military presence in northern Iraq but have left that to be handled by Kurdish militia. Even now, it is mostly the Kurdish militia that is fighting IS in Iraq, not so much the Iraq military.

Anyway when I was younger I remember a scene in that movie where the Chinese came out and declared "Religion is Poison."
That looks like a misquote of Karl Marx, who wrote the Communist Manifesto.  In that, he wrote "Religion is opium for the people".

You must be referring to Bill Clinton then. You'll find some interesting things went on during the mid-late 1990's that encouraged the subprime lending boom/bust.
I think that Reagan before him also did deregulate banks in ways that made them able to destabilise the economy, but I don't remember the details.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: Novus on Fri, 24 October 2014, 13:59:32
Liberals be liberating
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: hwood34 on Fri, 24 October 2014, 21:06:05
religion is just a poison, period.

this is just islams time up to bat. christians and catholics have had their fun.
It's always funny when one of my friend tries to say how Muslims just want to kill everyone and I'm like "you do know about this thing called the crusades, right? Or the Spanish inquisition?"
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: nubbinator on Sat, 25 October 2014, 01:05:41
Guys, it's all because America is a corporatocracy.  I'd rather we be in a narcokleptocracy.  At least in that kind of state, the poor usually get something out of it and not just the wealthy pulling the purse strings.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: tbc on Sat, 25 October 2014, 02:12:40
religion is just a poison, period.

this is just islams time up to bat. christians and catholics have had their fun.
It's always funny when one of my friend tries to say how Muslims just want to kill everyone and I'm like "you do know about this thing called the crusades, right? Or the Spanish inquisition?"

yep.  it's funny now that no one can deny it because you're always surrounded by at least 3 smartphones with an internet connection.

here's another point though.  history is written by the victors.  the reasons muslims look bad now is because they really suck at this mass murdering thing; aka they've lost, whereas the inquisition and crusades were hugely successful at killing people.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 25 October 2014, 15:19:39
Guys, it's all because America is a corporatocracy.  I'd rather we be in a narcokleptocracy.  At least in that kind of state, the poor usually get something out of it and not just the wealthy pulling the purse strings.

America is better than all other nations.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: fohat.digs on Sat, 25 October 2014, 15:45:26
America is better than all other nations.

As George Washington's 8th cousin, 6 times removed, I agree.

But that does not mean that we are not deeply and thoroughly ****ed in many ways, with our 1780s-era election system being at the root of many of the problems.

And, unfortunately, it is many of our best attributes that the fundamentalist extremists hate the most.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: smarmar on Fri, 14 November 2014, 17:52:20
Windows 98 was actually pretty buggy, now Windows 98 SE was l33t.

I have a dedicated Win98SE machine running my olde vidja games on their original media in their native environment. I blame the purist in me.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: smarmar on Fri, 14 November 2014, 18:04:14
Windows 98 was actually pretty buggy, now Windows 98 SE was l33t.

I have a dedicated Win98SE machine running my olde vidja games on their original media in their native environment. I blame the purist in me.

Sorry, folks. I didn't realize I had previously replied to this same comment and wrote pretty much the exact same thing. I just get so darned excited whenever I hear talk of Win98SE! :thumb:
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: fohat.digs on Fri, 14 November 2014, 18:47:36

Sorry, folks. I didn't realize I had previously replied to this same comment and wrote pretty much the exact same thing. I just get so darned excited whenever I hear talk of Win98SE!


I never had a problem with 98SE.

After I got used to XP, I let my sentimentality go, but I am not sure what XP/7 has really done to move the process forward. No real hurry to try 8, I will probably move toward a user-friendly Linux at some point in the not-too-distant future. The free-and-open-source thing really appeals to the libertarian-hippie in me, I don't see why we should have to pay for operating systems and basic day-to-day work functions, above and beyond what remuneration "the web" and its tentacles are gleaning off of us already.

Never really had any problem with DOS 5 either, for that matter.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: iMav on Fri, 14 November 2014, 19:18:43
I went from DOS (3.3) to playing with slackware (linux).  Was a big OS2 guy for a while...and dual-booted with Red Hat (v.3.0.3).  Also used Solaris x86 for a while.

Never really used Windows until I found myself in a job where I had to support it.  These days I don't mind it...and like have a Windows machine around.  But my primary systems are Mac.  (I hated Mac until the BSD-based OS X came out)
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Sat, 15 November 2014, 04:19:19
Windows 98 was actually pretty buggy, now Windows 98 SE was l33t.

I have a dedicated Win98SE machine running my olde vidja games on their original media in their native environment. I blame the purist in me.

Sorry, folks. I didn't realize I had previously replied to this same comment and wrote pretty much the exact same thing. I just get so darned excited whenever I hear talk of Win98SE! :thumb:

98SE was quite good, especially when compared to plain 98.  I still maintain that 98SE was what 98 should have been in the first place.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Coreda on Fri, 09 January 2015, 00:54:11
Good theme, or best theme. (http://win98theme.tumblr.com/)
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 19 September 2015, 15:32:06
DID YOU GET WINDOWS 98?
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: ideus on Sat, 19 September 2015, 16:51:11
Are you resurrecting all your old threads?
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: fohat.digs on Sat, 19 September 2015, 17:20:05
What will happen in the future when someone wants to install a "legacy" version of Windows but Microsoft will not "activate"it?

I have at least 1 legit package each of 3.1, 95, 98SE, XP, 7, and 8.1
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: ideus on Sat, 19 September 2015, 21:30:44
What will happen in the future when someone wants to install a "legacy" version of Windows but Microsoft will not "activate"it?

I have at least 1 legit package each of 3.1, 95, 98SE, XP, 7, and 8.1

What we have is a license that may eventually be expired. We do not buy the software, only the rights to use it, under certain conditions that are defined by the legal owner of the intellectual property.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Altis on Tue, 22 September 2015, 22:50:23
You'll be happy to know that I still use Windows 98 (albeit in a VM) fairly regularly at work maintaining some building automation controllers.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Elrick on Tue, 22 September 2015, 23:46:02
You'll be happy to know that I still use Windows 98 (albeit in a VM) fairly regularly at work maintaining some building automation controllers.

We do have some people actually still using Win 98 SE downstairs as a Gaming Setup for the Grand kiddies.

Thought I would turf out the older MS operating systems but instead kept all the items on floppies and cds for future use and installation.  Always keep the past alive because it seems to be better than what's available today.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Altis on Wed, 23 September 2015, 13:32:10
You'll be happy to know that I still use Windows 98 (albeit in a VM) fairly regularly at work maintaining some building automation controllers.

We do have some people actually still using Win 98 SE downstairs as a Gaming Setup for the Grand kiddies.

Thought I would turf out the older MS operating systems but instead kept all the items on floppies and cds for future use and installation.  Always keep the past alive because it seems to be better than what's available today.

It's interesting you should say that. One thing I've noticed is that when it comes to games, they've been good and fun for many years. While having great graphics and such can be tons of fun, the basic games can be just as enticing.

To be honest, many of the popular games on mobile phones and tablets are no more advanced than those oldies, anyways, and the 'retro' look is pretty popular now anyhow.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: SamirD on Wed, 23 September 2015, 14:21:30
Show Image
(http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/win311logo.gif)

Windows 3.11 on top of DOS, best damn thing ever. You could actually learn how the filesystem worked, just by using it. You had A:, you had C:, and if you were lucky you had D:. If you were unlucky you got B: instead. Those big-ass floppy Bs...

Now I'm like, "How is My Computer a folder, and in which drive is My Desktop?"
Be built a beast of a system ($7000+) in the early 1990s based on a Cyrix p166 that ran win3.1 on top of dos 6.22.  We still have it and it even booted recently, but the clock battery on the motherboard isn't good anymore and is soldered.  I just haven't had time to call up Supermicro to have them fix the motherboard. 

The storage sub-system was ridiculous--Mylex dac960sui connected to multiple 2nd gen Segate Cheetah drives in a raid5 configuration.  We could copy 10MB/s in DOS alone.  Plus 4 floppies, a scsi scanner, CD-R, Jaz Drive, Syjet drive--we actually ran out of drive letters!  And everything could work simultaneously after a week of tweaking all the drivers and memory allocations.  Set it up once and done.  You could read-only the system.ini and win.ini and your config would never change and just stop working.  Win95+ was a bit more plug and pray, but was pretty good by the time 98se was around.  I made a small program that would copy the critical files for these OSs and restore them at each boot to lock them down. 

I still have several file servers running 95 or 98se.  No need for more when you're just serving out files.  The system with the promise controller in it can hit 22MB/s, which is plenty good on a pentium pro 180 with 32mb of ram.

Ah, the memories... :thumb:
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 24 September 2015, 05:51:42
You'll be happy to know that I still use Windows 98 (albeit in a VM) fairly regularly at work maintaining some building automation controllers.

We do have some people actually still using Win 98 SE downstairs as a Gaming Setup for the Grand kiddies.

Thought I would turf out the older MS operating systems but instead kept all the items on floppies and cds for future use and installation.  Always keep the past alive because it seems to be better than what's available today.

EVERYBODY SHOULD USE WINDOWS 98. IT'S JUST SIMPLY ONE OF THE BEST OPERATING SYSTEMS.
Title: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: microsoft windows on Mon, 04 December 2017, 16:07:05
WE PROUDLY STAND WITH DONALD TRUMP.
 :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:  :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool::cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:
(https://thestudio1english.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/774ee-donaldtrumpvictory.jpg)
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Title: HILLARY FOR PRISON
Post by: microsoft windows on Mon, 04 December 2017, 16:09:08
IT IS NOT TOO LATE TO LOCK HER UP!
Title: Re: HILLARY FOR PRISON
Post by: digi on Mon, 04 December 2017, 16:11:47
YES!!! Welcome back MW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: digi on Mon, 04 December 2017, 16:12:44
Very nice thread.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Mon, 04 December 2017, 16:16:28
IT IS NOT TOO L-8

TO GET WINDOWS 98
Title: Re: HILLARY FOR PRISON
Post by: microsoft windows on Mon, 04 December 2017, 16:23:55
THROW THE WITCH IN JAIL. THEY CRIMINALLY CHARGED MIKE FLYNN WITH LYING TO THE FBI. WHO HAS HILLARY NOT LIED TO?

[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: noisyturtle on Mon, 04 December 2017, 16:25:43
(https://i.imgur.com/PI3A0hZ.gif)
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: dubious on Mon, 04 December 2017, 16:33:08
(https://images.dailykos.com/images/310702/story_image/IMG_1526.JPG?1476188840)
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: microsoft windows on Mon, 04 December 2017, 16:38:30
Show Image
(https://images.dailykos.com/images/310702/story_image/IMG_1526.JPG?1476188840)


LOOKS LIKE YOUR MIND HAS FALLEN FOR THE FAKE RUSSIAN 'PEE-GATE' DOSSIER FUNDED BY THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE. YOU NEED TO STOP READING THE FAKE NEWS AND DO SOME REAL RESARCH.
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: noisyturtle on Mon, 04 December 2017, 16:53:07
Ya know, I wouldn't be at all surprised if MS Windows was actually Trumps GH account.
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: dubious on Mon, 04 December 2017, 16:53:40
Show Image
(https://images.dailykos.com/images/310702/story_image/IMG_1526.JPG?1476188840)


LOOKS LIKE YOUR MIND HAS FALLEN FOR THE FAKE RUSSIAN 'PEE-GATE' DOSSIER FUNDED BY THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE. YOU NEED TO STOP READING THE FAKE NEWS AND DO SOME REAL RESARCH.

lol oh you mean like fox news?  ;)
Title: Re: HILLARY FOR PRISON
Post by: Findecanor on Mon, 04 December 2017, 17:42:33
Edmund Hillary is for prison?
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: SamirD on Mon, 04 December 2017, 18:09:27
Did you know that windows 98 has a remote desktop client--nothing more interesting than to see a windows 7 desktop on a win98 machine via rdp.  :thumb:
Title: Re: HILLARY FOR PRISON
Post by: FreeCopy on Mon, 04 December 2017, 18:59:45
THROW THE WITCH IN JAIL. THEY CRIMINALLY CHARGED MIKE FLYNN WITH LYING TO THE FBI. WHO HAS HILLARY NOT LIED TO?

(Attachment Link)

(https://i.imgur.com/65V87jj.jpg)
Title: Re: HILLARY FOR PRISON
Post by: C5Allroad on Mon, 04 December 2017, 20:27:20
When ms windows is back
(https://i.imgur.com/jQSFoYG.png)
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: Puddsy on Mon, 04 December 2017, 21:35:32
Ya know, I wouldn't be at all surprised if MS Windows was actually Trumps GH account.

i'd be overjoyed
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: SpAmRaY on Mon, 04 December 2017, 21:38:39
I have a 2018 trump calendar I'm going to put up in the office at work.
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: ander on Tue, 05 December 2017, 05:03:47
I take it this thread is a put-on... Nice job!
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: ander on Tue, 05 December 2017, 05:21:18
BTW, in case you ever wondered what that sound was...


[attachimg=1]


That's right. It's chest-beating.
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: chyros on Tue, 05 December 2017, 06:23:38
I don't understand why people make fun of Trump. He does a fantastic job of it himself already :p .
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: _rubik on Tue, 05 December 2017, 09:38:58
Ya know, I wouldn't be at all surprised if MS Windows was actually Trumps GH account.

i'd be overjoyed

That would be UGE
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 05 December 2017, 14:11:00
BTW, in case you ever wondered what that sound was...


(Attachment Link)


That's right. It's chest-beating.


YOU'RE A  RACIST!
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 05 December 2017, 14:13:37
INDEED! VERY VERY INTERESTING.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: SamirD on Tue, 05 December 2017, 18:48:33
INDEED! VERY VERY INTERESTING.
I believe this client will even work on Windows 95, and I know there is a standalone DOS-based RDP client, but I haven't tried it.  I'd love to see an IBM XT or AT with a Windows 7/10 desktop--that would freak people out!

Title: microsoft windows megathread
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 06 December 2017, 15:59:20
I AM EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTED WITH THIS APPALLINGLY  HORRIFIC SIMPLE MACHINES FORUM SOFTWARE. WHEN I SELECT "COMIC SANS MS" FROM THE DROP DOWN MENU IN THE POST EDITOR, IT COMES OUT AS A SERIF FONT LIKE THIS.

THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE OUTRAGE. THIS NEEDS TO BE FIXED IMMEDIATELY!
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 06 December 2017, 16:01:48
DONALD TRUMP HAS NOW DECLARED THAT THE UNITED STATES WILL MOVE HER ISRAELI EMBASSY TO JERUSALEM. THIS IS A LONG OVERDUE MOVE. GOOD JOB TRUMP!
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: Puddsy on Wed, 06 December 2017, 16:02:59
it works
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 06 December 2017, 16:03:38
INDEED! VERY VERY INTERESTING.
I believe this client will even work on Windows 95, and I know there is a standalone DOS-based RDP client, but I haven't tried it.  I'd love to see an IBM XT or AT with a Windows 7/10 desktop--that would freak people out!



I should try that some time. I've got some old 486 laptops hanging around that could probably work well as remote desktop terminals. Nothing like seeing Windows 10 on a 7" screen from a "beige brick" laptop!
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Wed, 06 December 2017, 16:26:28
Maybe try updating to the latest version of Internet Explorer.
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: rowdy on Wed, 06 December 2017, 19:49:15
Maybe try updating to the latest version of Internet Explorer.

IE is dead.  Long live Edge.
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: rowdy on Wed, 06 December 2017, 19:49:41
Anyway it looks like Comic Sans to me.

Perhaps a fault with your operating system not rendering the text correctly.
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: hydrochloride on Thu, 07 December 2017, 04:10:17
DONALD TRUMP HAS NOW DECLARED THAT THE UNITED STATES WILL MOVE HER ISRAELI EMBASSY TO JERUSALEM. THIS IS A LONG OVERDUE MOVE. GOOD JOB TRUMP!
I guess the last intifada was reason enough. I guess another intifada is coming soon.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: HILLARY FOR PRISON
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 07 December 2017, 18:42:32
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: SamirD on Fri, 08 December 2017, 17:13:28
That's exactly what I plan to do with an older thinkpad with the lovely keyboard it has.  It's a 486 and has enough ram to run win95.  Just gotta back up the stock configuration and install the rdp client and then rdp into my windows 7 machine, haha.  LOVELY!

I'm actually typing this from a 98se machine that's rdp'd into a windows 7 client that's rdp'd into an xp machine.  I think I've got every generation covered in this one post.  :eek:
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 08 December 2017, 17:18:50
That's exactly what I plan to do with an older thinkpad with the lovely keyboard it has.  It's a 486 and has enough ram to run win95.  Just gotta back up the stock configuration and install the rdp client and then rdp into my windows 7 machine, haha.  LOVELY!

I'm actually typing this from a 98se machine that's rdp'd into a windows 7 client that's rdp'd into an xp machine.  I think I've got every generation covered in this one post.  :eek:


Stop trying to break the universe..  jesus, we gotta live here..
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Altis on Fri, 08 December 2017, 17:34:21
Well slap me thrice and hand me to my momma... it's microsoft windows!
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 08 December 2017, 17:41:52
Well slap me thrice and hand me to my momma... it's microsoft windows!

He never left..  he's got a billion accounts.
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 09 December 2017, 13:35:58
DONALD TRUMP HAS NOW DECLARED THAT THE UNITED STATES WILL MOVE HER ISRAELI EMBASSY TO JERUSALEM. THIS IS A LONG OVERDUE MOVE. GOOD JOB TRUMP!
I guess the last intifada was reason enough. I guess another intifada is coming soon.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk



YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. YOU NEED TO GET WINDOWS 98 AND DO SOME MORE RESEARCH.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 09 December 2017, 13:39:37
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Altis on Sat, 09 December 2017, 16:45:48
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)


Best wallpaper ever created:

(https://images6.alphacoders.com/497/497191.png)
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 09 December 2017, 17:44:05
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)


Best wallpaper ever created:

Show Image
(https://images6.alphacoders.com/497/497191.png)


THAT IS AN AMAZING WORK OF ART. PUT THAT IN A MODERN ART GALLERY AND SOMEBODY WILL PAY $50 MILLION FOR THIS MICROSOFT-INSPIRED MASTERPIECE.
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 09 December 2017, 17:49:52
I really think it's time to put this logo on the site. The current one is so boring.

[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: tp4tissue on Sat, 09 December 2017, 18:09:13
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)


Best wallpaper ever created:

Show Image
(https://images6.alphacoders.com/497/497191.png)


THAT IS AN AMAZING WORK OF ART. PUT THAT IN A MODERN ART GALLERY AND SOMEBODY WILL PAY $50 MILLION FOR THIS MICROSOFT-INSPIRED MASTERPIECE.

need a 4k version.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 09 December 2017, 18:10:54
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)


Best wallpaper ever created:

Show Image
(https://images6.alphacoders.com/497/497191.png)


THAT IS AN AMAZING WORK OF ART. PUT THAT IN A MODERN ART GALLERY AND SOMEBODY WILL PAY $50 MILLION FOR THIS MICROSOFT-INSPIRED MASTERPIECE.

need a 4k version.

WHO NEEDS 4K WHEN THERE'S VGA?

ADVERTISEMENT
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: SamirD on Sun, 10 December 2017, 01:17:05
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)
Show Image
(https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FtajDxBaPBBM%2Fhqdefault.jpg&f=1)


Best wallpaper ever created:

Show Image
(https://images6.alphacoders.com/497/497191.png)


THAT IS AN AMAZING WORK OF ART. PUT THAT IN A MODERN ART GALLERY AND SOMEBODY WILL PAY $50 MILLION FOR THIS MICROSOFT-INSPIRED MASTERPIECE.

need a 4k version.

WHO NEEDS 4K WHEN THERE'S VGA?

ADVERTISEMENT
(Attachment Link)
Best.  Rhyme.  Ever.  :cool:

Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: SamirD on Sun, 10 December 2017, 01:50:30
So earlier today I was working on some older IBM servers that we had that I need to repurpose for current uses as well as archive the current data.  They were used as hotel property management system servers.  I thought because of their era, they would have been running w2k, but nope--windows 98.  And it flies!  On an old p4 1.8Ghz with 128mb of ram it screams like a windows 7 machine on an i7 with 16gb of ram.  It's amazing how much can still be done with w98 outside of Internet connectivity.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: tp4tissue on Sun, 10 December 2017, 09:35:04
So earlier today I was working on some older IBM servers that we had that I need to repurpose for current uses as well as archive the current data.  They were used as hotel property management system servers.  I thought because of their era, they would have been running w2k, but nope--windows 98.  And it flies!  On an old p4 1.8Ghz with 128mb of ram it screams like a windows 7 machine on an i7 with 16gb of ram.  It's amazing how much can still be done with w98 outside of Internet connectivity.

The applications are DESIGNED for that hardware, so there's alot less bloat..

Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Sun, 10 December 2017, 12:18:36
SOFTWARE WITH LESS BLOATWARE IS SUPERIOR. IT'S HARD TO BEAT WINDOWS 9X OR 2000 ON A PENTIUM 4. OFFICE '97 WILL START IN LESS THAN A SECOND. BEST SOFTWARE EVER MADE!
Title: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: microsoft windows on Sun, 10 December 2017, 12:26:43
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT SNOW? DO YOU LIKE IT OR HATE IT? HOW DO YOU LIKE DRIVING IN THE SNOW? DO YOU THINK PEOPLE AROUND YOU ARE GOOD AT DRIVING IN THE SNOW? DO YOU WISH IT WOULD SNOW MORE? DO YOU LIKE TO SKI?

POST YOUR THOUGHTS HERE.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: noisyturtle on Sun, 10 December 2017, 15:06:46
I find there to be a direct correlation between my age increasing and my dislike for snow increasing.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: chyros on Sun, 10 December 2017, 15:09:30
It's pretty, but extremely impractical.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Sun, 10 December 2017, 19:56:26
SOFTWARE WITH LESS BLOATWARE IS SUPERIOR. IT'S HARD TO BEAT WINDOWS 9X OR 2000 ON A PENTIUM 4. OFFICE '97 WILL START IN LESS THAN A SECOND. BEST SOFTWARE EVER MADE!

Recent versions of Office certainly have gone downhill.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: Puddsy on Sun, 10 December 2017, 23:55:33
it's annoying and makes me fall over
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: _rubik on Mon, 11 December 2017, 00:04:40
Snow is pretty, but I hate getting my car stuck in poorly plowed parking lots. Also hate not being able to look around street corners and having to pull out blind
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: Wirakocha on Mon, 11 December 2017, 07:30:32
omg I hate snow so much.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: AMongoose on Mon, 11 December 2017, 07:34:12
It's alright, it only happens once in a century and lasts all but 2 hours before it melts, not very inconvenient.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: microsoft windows on Mon, 11 December 2017, 07:54:08
DOES ANYBODY HERE LIKE TO USE COMPUTERS IN THE SNOW?
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Mon, 11 December 2017, 07:57:49
SOFTWARE WITH LESS BLOATWARE IS SUPERIOR. IT'S HARD TO BEAT WINDOWS 9X OR 2000 ON A PENTIUM 4. OFFICE '97 WILL START IN LESS THAN A SECOND. BEST SOFTWARE EVER MADE!

Recent versions of Office certainly have gone downhill.

ABSOLUTELY! THE NEW MICROSOFT WORD TAKES UP SO MUCH MORE SYSTEM RESOURCES THAN WORD 97. AND WHAT MORE DOES  IT DO BESIDES SAVING IN THE .DOCX FORMAT? IT'S JUST A BUNCH OF CRAP.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: digi on Mon, 11 December 2017, 12:13:57
(https://media.giphy.com/media/TvviGPQRZk080/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: microsoft windows on Mon, 11 December 2017, 13:51:14
NICEPICTURE
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: Findecanor on Mon, 11 December 2017, 14:12:21
I live in the North where the days are short and dark in the winter and where the days are long and bright in the summer.
A cloudy day in December can be darker at noon than at 2 am in the middle of summer... At noon, the sunlight is not coming from above - it is literally horizontal.

Having white snow on the ground, on trees and on roof tops makes the day brighter. It is important for the well-being.

Road slush, with soot from car exhaust and sand is grey. I hate that.
Get a proper public transport system in your city so you don't have to drive!
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 11 December 2017, 14:19:47
I live in the North where the days are short and dark in the winter and where the days are long and bright in the summer.
A cloudy day in December can be darker at noon than at 2 am in the middle of summer... At noon, the sunlight is not coming from above - it is literally horizontal.

Having white snow on the ground, on trees and on roof tops makes the day brighter. It is important for the well-being.

Road slush, with soot from car exhaust and sand is grey. I hate that.
Get a proper public transport system in your city so you don't have to drive!


Public transportation is disgusting..
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: microsoft windows on Mon, 11 December 2017, 14:24:25
I live in the North where the days are short and dark in the winter and where the days are long and bright in the summer.
A cloudy day in December can be darker at noon than at 2 am in the middle of summer... At noon, the sunlight is not coming from above - it is literally horizontal.

Having white snow on the ground, on trees and on roof tops makes the day brighter. It is important for the well-being.

Road slush, with soot from car exhaust and sand is grey. I hate that.
Get a proper public transport system in your city so you don't have to drive!


Public transportation is disgusting..

I AGREE! EVERY PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM I EVER RODE ON WAS FULL OF STINKY WEIRDOS. I'D RATHER DRIVE MY CAR WHERE AND WHEN I WANT IN THE SNOW.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: Findecanor on Mon, 11 December 2017, 17:05:47
Public transportation is disgusting..
I wrote "proper public transport system" !
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: digi on Mon, 11 December 2017, 17:41:31
Public transportation is disgusting..

See this is how it begins...TP went Vegan and now he's too good for public transportation. The Popeye's slingin', Ramen eating TP would hop on a bus with his drunk friends and have a blast.

For shame TP, for shame.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Mon, 11 December 2017, 19:46:24
SOFTWARE WITH LESS BLOATWARE IS SUPERIOR. IT'S HARD TO BEAT WINDOWS 9X OR 2000 ON A PENTIUM 4. OFFICE '97 WILL START IN LESS THAN A SECOND. BEST SOFTWARE EVER MADE!

Recent versions of Office certainly have gone downhill.

ABSOLUTELY! THE NEW MICROSOFT WORD TAKES UP SO MUCH MORE SYSTEM RESOURCES THAN WORD 97. AND WHAT MORE DOES  IT DO BESIDES SAVING IN THE .DOCX FORMAT? IT'S JUST A BUNCH OF CRAP.

I peaked out at Office 2000, although I'm still not convinced about that ribbon thing.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 11 December 2017, 21:15:22
Public transportation is disgusting..
I wrote "proper public transport system" !

As long as we have social inequality, we will have riff-raffs. And as Long as we have riff-raffs, public transportation is just plain dangerous and undesirable.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Altis on Tue, 12 December 2017, 02:05:08
SOFTWARE WITH LESS BLOATWARE IS SUPERIOR. IT'S HARD TO BEAT WINDOWS 9X OR 2000 ON A PENTIUM 4. OFFICE '97 WILL START IN LESS THAN A SECOND. BEST SOFTWARE EVER MADE!

Recent versions of Office certainly have gone downhill.

ABSOLUTELY! THE NEW MICROSOFT WORD TAKES UP SO MUCH MORE SYSTEM RESOURCES THAN WORD 97. AND WHAT MORE DOES  IT DO BESIDES SAVING IN THE .DOCX FORMAT? IT'S JUST A BUNCH OF CRAP.

It's funny you mention that.

I've been doing a lot of work in MS WordPad. I'll be honest, it actually works beautifully for a lot of what I need to do, which is just a text editor with a touch of formatting and the odd photo included.

It's very fast and doesn't endlessly fight me to format things how it wants, it just lets me do it. The files are small and are easy for anyone to open and work with, especially if they're on Windows.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: AMongoose on Tue, 12 December 2017, 05:23:09
Public transportation is disgusting..
I wrote "proper public transport system" !

As long as we have social inequality, we will have riff-raffs. And as Long as we have riff-raffs, public transportation is just plain dangerous and undesirable.

So the best is to always live walled instead of respecting fellow human beings?
I ride public transport every day, goes straight through some of the worst neighborhoods of my country, people get in the bus to go to work just like me.
Why would I ever be in more danger in a public transport than at home or in the street?
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 12 December 2017, 06:09:33
DID ANYBODY GET ANY SNOW TODAY?
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 12 December 2017, 06:11:21
SOFTWARE WITH LESS BLOATWARE IS SUPERIOR. IT'S HARD TO BEAT WINDOWS 9X OR 2000 ON A PENTIUM 4. OFFICE '97 WILL START IN LESS THAN A SECOND. BEST SOFTWARE EVER MADE!

Recent versions of Office certainly have gone downhill.

ABSOLUTELY! THE NEW MICROSOFT WORD TAKES UP SO MUCH MORE SYSTEM RESOURCES THAN WORD 97. AND WHAT MORE DOES  IT DO BESIDES SAVING IN THE .DOCX FORMAT? IT'S JUST A BUNCH OF CRAP.

It's funny you mention that.

I've been doing a lot of work in MS WordPad. I'll be honest, it actually works beautifully for a lot of what I need to do, which is just a text editor with a touch of formatting and the odd photo included.

It's very fast and doesn't endlessly fight me to format things how it wants, it just lets me do it. The files are small and are easy for anyone to open and work with, especially if they're on Windows.

I ALWAYS LIKED WORDPAD AS WELL. LIGHTWEIGHT SOFTWARE THAT DOESN'T TRY AND FORCE ITS WAYS UPON THE USER IS NOT EASY TO FIND IN THIS DAY AND AGE.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 12 December 2017, 07:25:36

So the best is to always live walled instead of respecting fellow human beings?
I ride public transport every day, goes straight through some of the worst neighborhoods of my country, people get in the bus to go to work just like me.
Why would I ever be in more danger in a public transport than at home or in the street?


In your own car, workplace, home, there is a selection barrier.

That barrier is not there for public transportation.

That's the difference, and that's why it is more dangerous.



You don't get stabbed to death in your own car, (assuming you're not involved in some domestic violence debacle).

Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: AMongoose on Tue, 12 December 2017, 07:38:43

So the best is to always live walled instead of respecting fellow human beings?
I ride public transport every day, goes straight through some of the worst neighborhoods of my country, people get in the bus to go to work just like me.
Why would I ever be in more danger in a public transport than at home or in the street?


In your own car, workplace, home, there is a selection barrier.

That barrier is not there for public transportation.

That's the difference, and that's why it is more dangerous.



You don't get stabbed to death in your own car, (assuming you're not involved in some domestic violence debacle).



You don't get stabbed to death in a public transport, why would you? You CAN be stabbed, but it just doesn't happen. You can also be shot in your car or chopped with an axe in your house at night.

You are viewing things all wrong. It's when you are alone that you are in danger, if you are in a public place you're protected.
And no one is going to attack you with no reason, for someone to fear this would mean a complete lack of understanding of other people.

Any barrier is easily breakable, you need other people to protect yourself.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 12 December 2017, 09:45:24

You don't get stabbed to death in a public transport, why would you? You CAN be stabbed, but it just doesn't happen. You can also be shot in your car or chopped with an axe in your house at night.

You are viewing things all wrong. It's when you are alone that you are in danger, if you are in a public place you're protected.
And no one is going to attack you with no reason, for someone to fear this would mean a complete lack of understanding of other people.

Any barrier is easily breakable, you need other people to protect yourself.


O, Rly ?

https://www.google.com/search?q=stabbed+on+the+bus&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

All these ^^^^ happened IN PUBLIC

The most dangerous thing to humans are OTHER HUMANS..

You've got it completely backwards.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 12 December 2017, 10:05:32
People who smell bad, have a history of drug use, and those who use Macs should be permanently barred from public transport.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: sncbraxsc2 on Tue, 12 December 2017, 10:05:53

You don't get stabbed to death in a public transport, why would you? You CAN be stabbed, but it just doesn't happen. You can also be shot in your car or chopped with an axe in your house at night.

You are viewing things all wrong. It's when you are alone that you are in danger, if you are in a public place you're protected.
And no one is going to attack you with no reason, for someone to fear this would mean a complete lack of understanding of other people.

Any barrier is easily breakable, you need other people to protect yourself.


O, Rly ?

https://www.google.com/search?q=stabbed+on+the+bus&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

All these ^^^^ happened IN PUBLIC

The most dangerous thing to humans are OTHER HUMANS..

You've got it completely backwards.

While this is super off topic... Sure, public transportation CAN be dangerous. Especially in a bigger city. All things considered, is it MORE dangerous than your own vehicle? Are you more likely to have an accident in your own vehicle or be stabbed by a machete swinging crazed public transport passenger? Is it the uncleanliness of public transport that makes it more dangerous? There are many dangers to consider if you are one to worry

On topic, I love the snow and hate the cold. I grew up in Virginia where we would have snow days 1-3 times a winter and it was a ton of fun. Moved to Florida when I was 14 and only miss the snow when its really cold, so not too often. I've only seen snow fall here once or twice and it never sticks
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: AMongoose on Tue, 12 December 2017, 11:21:24

You don't get stabbed to death in a public transport, why would you? You CAN be stabbed, but it just doesn't happen. You can also be shot in your car or chopped with an axe in your house at night.

You are viewing things all wrong. It's when you are alone that you are in danger, if you are in a public place you're protected.
And no one is going to attack you with no reason, for someone to fear this would mean a complete lack of understanding of other people.

Any barrier is easily breakable, you need other people to protect yourself.


O, Rly ?

https://www.google.com/search?q=stabbed+on+the+bus&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

All these ^^^^ happened IN PUBLIC

The most dangerous thing to humans are OTHER HUMANS..

You've got it completely backwards.

https://www.google.com/search?q=stabbed+at+home&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Your point is what?

While humans CAN be dangerous it doesn't mean they ARE. In american terms it's the same as how you owning a gun doesn't make you a killer.
And in the event that someone does want to harm you do you really think staying inside a house or car is going to save you? Only another group of people can save you. That's why the police exists.

This philosophy of fear of others is quite frankly disgusting, you are living surrounded by the benefits and achievements of society and yet doubt the basis for it's function.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 12 December 2017, 11:49:49


While humans CAN be dangerous it doesn't mean they ARE. In american terms it's the same as how you owning a gun doesn't make you a killer.
And in the event that someone does want to harm you do you really think staying inside a house or car is going to save you? Only another group of people can save you. That's why the police exists.

This philosophy of fear of others is quite frankly disgusting, you are living surrounded by the benefits and achievements of society and yet doubt the basis for it's function.



Humans are the most dangerous thing out in the world.

Look at all the stabbings,  all perpetrated by PEOPLE..

Therefore   PEOPLE = Dangerous
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: _rubik on Tue, 12 December 2017, 13:27:22


While humans CAN be dangerous it doesn't mean they ARE. In american terms it's the same as how you owning a gun doesn't make you a killer.
And in the event that someone does want to harm you do you really think staying inside a house or car is going to save you? Only another group of people can save you. That's why the police exists.

This philosophy of fear of others is quite frankly disgusting, you are living surrounded by the benefits and achievements of society and yet doubt the basis for it's function.



Humans are the most dangerous thing out in the world.

Look at all the stabbings,  all perpetrated by PEOPLE..

Therefore   PEOPLE = Dangerous

So... uhh... I take it you all don't like snow.

Yeesh even the off-topic threads head off-topic.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: Findecanor on Tue, 12 December 2017, 16:23:46
Snow also makes the nights brighter.

White snow illuminated by street light makes the bright lights easier on the eyes, and it is easier to see where you are going than if the ground was bare.

Stupid slushy slipper weather today here though... Not easy to get around. But wait until the temperature drops below 0°C and stays there for weeks.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: 1swt2gs on Tue, 12 December 2017, 16:32:21
I love snow. Too bad the last time it snowed was over 50+ years ago in LA
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE SNOW?
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 12 December 2017, 16:45:37
I love snow. Too bad the last time it snowed was over 50+ years ago in LA


Better pick out your outlander names and tune up that v8 engine
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Tue, 12 December 2017, 19:53:08
SOFTWARE WITH LESS BLOATWARE IS SUPERIOR. IT'S HARD TO BEAT WINDOWS 9X OR 2000 ON A PENTIUM 4. OFFICE '97 WILL START IN LESS THAN A SECOND. BEST SOFTWARE EVER MADE!

Recent versions of Office certainly have gone downhill.

ABSOLUTELY! THE NEW MICROSOFT WORD TAKES UP SO MUCH MORE SYSTEM RESOURCES THAN WORD 97. AND WHAT MORE DOES  IT DO BESIDES SAVING IN THE .DOCX FORMAT? IT'S JUST A BUNCH OF CRAP.

It's funny you mention that.

I've been doing a lot of work in MS WordPad. I'll be honest, it actually works beautifully for a lot of what I need to do, which is just a text editor with a touch of formatting and the odd photo included.

It's very fast and doesn't endlessly fight me to format things how it wants, it just lets me do it. The files are small and are easy for anyone to open and work with, especially if they're on Windows.

I ALWAYS LIKED WORDPAD AS WELL. LIGHTWEIGHT SOFTWARE THAT DOESN'T TRY AND FORCE ITS WAYS UPON THE USER IS NOT EASY TO FIND IN THIS DAY AND AGE.

Software where you use 90% of its functionality every day.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 13 December 2017, 04:50:58
SOFTWARE WITH LESS BLOATWARE IS SUPERIOR. IT'S HARD TO BEAT WINDOWS 9X OR 2000 ON A PENTIUM 4. OFFICE '97 WILL START IN LESS THAN A SECOND. BEST SOFTWARE EVER MADE!

Recent versions of Office certainly have gone downhill.

ABSOLUTELY! THE NEW MICROSOFT WORD TAKES UP SO MUCH MORE SYSTEM RESOURCES THAN WORD 97. AND WHAT MORE DOES  IT DO BESIDES SAVING IN THE .DOCX FORMAT? IT'S JUST A BUNCH OF CRAP.

It's funny you mention that.

I've been doing a lot of work in MS WordPad. I'll be honest, it actually works beautifully for a lot of what I need to do, which is just a text editor with a touch of formatting and the odd photo included.

It's very fast and doesn't endlessly fight me to format things how it wants, it just lets me do it. The files are small and are easy for anyone to open and work with, especially if they're on Windows.

I ALWAYS LIKED WORDPAD AS WELL. LIGHTWEIGHT SOFTWARE THAT DOESN'T TRY AND FORCE ITS WAYS UPON THE USER IS NOT EASY TO FIND IN THIS DAY AND AGE.

Software where you use 90% of its functionality every day.

That's the way it should be, rather than bloatware that pretends to be "lighweight" by hiding all the menus and features (internet browsers, anyone?).
Title: VHS or Betamax: Which do you prefer?
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 13 December 2017, 18:34:06
Dish the dirt here.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 13 December 2017, 18:39:57
EVEN THREE YEARS LATER, IE6 IS STILL ALIVE. LONG LIVE INTERNET EXPLORER!
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Wed, 13 December 2017, 19:56:19
SOFTWARE WITH LESS BLOATWARE IS SUPERIOR. IT'S HARD TO BEAT WINDOWS 9X OR 2000 ON A PENTIUM 4. OFFICE '97 WILL START IN LESS THAN A SECOND. BEST SOFTWARE EVER MADE!

Recent versions of Office certainly have gone downhill.

ABSOLUTELY! THE NEW MICROSOFT WORD TAKES UP SO MUCH MORE SYSTEM RESOURCES THAN WORD 97. AND WHAT MORE DOES  IT DO BESIDES SAVING IN THE .DOCX FORMAT? IT'S JUST A BUNCH OF CRAP.

It's funny you mention that.

I've been doing a lot of work in MS WordPad. I'll be honest, it actually works beautifully for a lot of what I need to do, which is just a text editor with a touch of formatting and the odd photo included.

It's very fast and doesn't endlessly fight me to format things how it wants, it just lets me do it. The files are small and are easy for anyone to open and work with, especially if they're on Windows.

I ALWAYS LIKED WORDPAD AS WELL. LIGHTWEIGHT SOFTWARE THAT DOESN'T TRY AND FORCE ITS WAYS UPON THE USER IS NOT EASY TO FIND IN THIS DAY AND AGE.

Software where you use 90% of its functionality every day.

That's the way it should be, rather than bloatware that pretends to be "lighweight" by hiding all the menus and features (internet browsers, anyone?).

Hidden menu options make software harder to use - when you actually want to use one of the hidden features you have to start searching through hidden menu options to find it.
Title: Re: VHS or Betamax: Which do you prefer?
Post by: noisyturtle on Wed, 13 December 2017, 22:07:16
Betamax is the superior technology, but VHS has porn so I'm going with that
Title: Re: VHS or Betamax: Which do you prefer?
Post by: xtrafrood on Thu, 14 December 2017, 13:47:06
Watched The Voyage Home for the first time on beta. Can confirm; Betamax is awful. I'll keep the betamax tapes to save you all from needless suffering..
Title: Re: VHS or Betamax: Which do you prefer?
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 14 December 2017, 13:53:31
Betamax is the superior technology, but VHS has porn so I'm going with that

Same with virtual reality.. it's really the only thing keeping the industry alive right now..

Because VR games are just worse and unplayable in the long sittings with the heavy headset and circulation cutoff..
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: rowdy on Thu, 14 December 2017, 19:54:36
I have a 2018 trump calendar I'm going to put up in the office at work.

For target practice?
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: brie6 on Fri, 15 December 2017, 01:01:53
Internet Explorer 6 was notorious for security vulnerabilities that Microsoft was sometimes slow to patch
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 15 December 2017, 13:52:20
Internet Explorer 6 was notorious for security vulnerabilities that Microsoft was sometimes slow to patch

NO IT WASN'T.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: JP on Sat, 16 December 2017, 18:00:32
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: Glod on Sat, 16 December 2017, 21:13:26
You are cancer
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: JP on Sat, 16 December 2017, 21:14:04
[attachimg=1]
Title: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: microsoft windows on Sun, 17 December 2017, 09:40:50
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT THIS IMAGE?

[attachimg=1]

I THINK IT IS EXTREMELY INTERESTING.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Sun, 17 December 2017, 09:41:29
(Attachment Link)

WINDOWS 98 IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS 10. IT DOESN'T SEND YOUR DATA TO BIG BROTHER! YET ANOTHER REASON TO ADOPT THAT FINE OPERATING SYSTEM.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: iLLucionist on Sun, 17 December 2017, 14:33:48
I STILL USE MOSAIC.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: iLLucionist on Sun, 17 December 2017, 14:34:24
(Attachment Link)

WINDOWS 98 IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS 10. IT DOESN'T SEND YOUR DATA TO BIG BROTHER! YET ANOTHER REASON TO ADOPT THAT FINE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Except for shiny "Active Desktop"..
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: iLLucionist on Sun, 17 December 2017, 14:36:10
Is there a correlation between cat and the meat in the hotdogs?

EDIT: are they.... HOTCATS?
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: schoolbus on Sun, 17 December 2017, 15:14:15
best image on the internet
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: tp4tissue on Sun, 17 December 2017, 15:45:45
Do cats eat hotdogs ?
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: daskeybo on Sun, 17 December 2017, 17:06:27
Looks like Times Roman.
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: microsoft windows on Sun, 17 December 2017, 17:16:39
Do cats eat hotdogs ?

YES THEY DO.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Sun, 17 December 2017, 17:20:17
You are cancer

SO ARE YOU
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Sun, 17 December 2017, 17:21:13
(Attachment Link)

WINDOWS 98 IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS 10. IT DOESN'T SEND YOUR DATA TO BIG BROTHER! YET ANOTHER REASON TO ADOPT THAT FINE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Except for shiny "Active Desktop"..

DO YOU USE WINDOWS 98?
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: Duckyreddy on Sun, 17 December 2017, 17:24:46
Do cats eat hotdogs ?

the most important question is...
do hotdogs eat cats?
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: microsoft windows on Sun, 17 December 2017, 17:29:24
Do cats eat hotdogs ?

the most important question is...
do hotdogs eat cats?

NO THEY DO NOT.
Title: A Message from the President
Post by: microsoft windows on Sun, 17 December 2017, 17:47:46
[attachimg=2]

As the president of Geekhack.org, I officially wish everyone a MERRY CHRISTMAS next Monday!

[attachimg=1]

[attachimg=2]
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: meiosis on Sun, 17 December 2017, 18:26:32
Can I be FCC commissioner of GH?
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: Duckyreddy on Sun, 17 December 2017, 18:41:28
Can I be Secretary of Defense of GH?
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: microsoft windows on Sun, 17 December 2017, 20:02:27
PERHAPS. ALL OF MY CABINET MEMBERS MUST BE ACTIVE USERS OF WINDOWS 98 IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR POSITIONS. THEY ALSO MUST USE MECHANICAL KEYBOARDS AND RENOUNCE ANY FAVOURABLE OPINIONS OF APPLE PRODUCTS.

BUT ON OTHER THOUGHTS, HAVE A MERRY CHRISTMAS!
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: JP on Mon, 18 December 2017, 10:08:47
CAN YOUR BROWSER DO THIS? IF NOT, SWITCH TO IE6!

[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: noisyturtle on Mon, 18 December 2017, 10:52:26
The new Firefox was giving my home PC all sorts of issues so I switched back to Chrome, which still sucks.

It absolutly boggles the mind that Google has known about the severe memory leakage Chrome causes, and have never addressed it after all these years. 
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: noisyturtle on Mon, 18 December 2017, 10:54:41
(https://78.media.tumblr.com/1d253200ba8769529b2948f544c923e4/tumblr_ocpnum9eYK1ttrxmxo1_1280.jpg)
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: JP on Mon, 18 December 2017, 11:05:09
The new Firefox was giving my home PC all sorts of issues so I switched back to Chrome, which still sucks.

It absolutly boggles the mind that Google has known about the severe memory leakage Chrome causes, and have never addressed it after all these years.

Chrome be like

[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: JP on Mon, 18 December 2017, 12:00:42
That is gold. lol
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: JP on Mon, 18 December 2017, 16:37:35
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 19 December 2017, 14:14:42
Show Image
(https://78.media.tumblr.com/1d253200ba8769529b2948f544c923e4/tumblr_ocpnum9eYK1ttrxmxo1_1280.jpg)


I LIKE THAT PICTURE
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 19 December 2017, 14:16:02
ONLY STUPID PEOPLE USE GOOGLE CHROME. BOYCOTT GOOGLE!
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: noisyturtle on Tue, 19 December 2017, 14:38:37
(http://forgifs.com/gallery/d/260376-2/Cat-wants-hot-dogs-on-table.gif)
Title: GOP TAX REFORM BILL
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 19 December 2017, 16:44:35
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE TAX REFORM BILL THAT IS GOING THROUGH CONGRESS NOW? SOME ECONOMISTS PROJECT THAT IT COULD LEAD TO 4% GDP GROWTH NEXT YEAR. DO YOU THINK THEIR PREDICTIONS ARE ACCURATE? HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THE REPEAL OF THE INDIVIDUAL HEALTH CARE MANDATE? ANY CHANGES YOU WISH WERE MADE TO THE BILL? POST YOUR THOUGHTS HERE.
Title: Re: GOP TAX REFORM BILL
Post by: fohat.digs on Tue, 19 December 2017, 16:52:42
your insanity does not deserve to be dignified with a response, but
Title: Re: GOP TAX REFORM BILL
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 19 December 2017, 16:55:06
your insanity does not deserve to be dignified with a response, but

YOU'RE IN NO POSITION TO CALL ANYONE INSANE!

Title: Re: GOP TAX REFORM BILL
Post by: chyros on Tue, 19 December 2017, 16:57:46
Seriously, what is America's obsession with ultra-low taxes?
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: JP on Tue, 19 December 2017, 18:20:48
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: GOP TAX REFORM BILL
Post by: fohat.digs on Tue, 19 December 2017, 19:05:47
Seriously, what is America's obsession with ultra-low taxes?

Only the ultra-wealthy are obsessed with paying no taxes, and they realized decades ago that millions paid to members of Congress in bribes was an investment that would return billions in taxes that they would not have to pay.

Only when common Americans come to understand that the "elites" have crippled our society and permanently squandered our previously formidable standing in the world community will they remove them from office, but it will be too late.

Already, many of the architects of this abomination, most notably Paul Ryan, have announced that they will not even attempt to seek re-election, taking their riches and riding off into the sunset.
Title: TUCK FRUMP
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 20 December 2017, 10:42:57
BECAUSE WE ALL LIKE LITERALLY KNOW THAT DONALD TRUMP IS LIKE LITERALLY HITLER!

Title: Re: TUCK FRUMP
Post by: skitty on Wed, 20 December 2017, 11:36:50
how to stop automatic updates
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: daskeybo on Wed, 20 December 2017, 12:16:24
MERRY CHRISTMAS!
Title: Re: TUCK FRUMP
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 20 December 2017, 12:37:17
how to stop automatic updates

ARE YOU BEING A RACIST?
Title: Re: TUCK FRUMP
Post by: DALExSNAIL on Wed, 20 December 2017, 12:43:21
how to stop automatic updates

WHY AUTOMATICALLY UPDATE WHEN YOU COULD BE A HAPPIER PERSON ON WINDOWS 98'
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: kurplop on Wed, 20 December 2017, 12:50:51
While my using Apple products (I hate myself for that) may disqualify me from service in your cabinet, I would still like to offer up my MERRY CHRISTMAS to you, Mr. President.
Title: Re: TUCK FRUMP
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 20 December 2017, 13:00:10
how to stop automatic updates

WHY AUTOMATICALLY UPDATE WHEN YOU COULD BE A HAPPIER PERSON ON WINDOWS 98'

THAT'S RIGHT! WINDOWS 98 IS THE FUTURE OF COMPUTING!
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: DALExSNAIL on Wed, 20 December 2017, 13:07:04
MERRY CHRISTMAS

(https://greetings-day.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Christmas_Snow_GIF_Animated.gif)
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 20 December 2017, 15:53:02
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=93071.0;attach=184573;image)

While my using Apple products (I hate myself for that) may disqualify me from service in your cabinet, I would still like to offer up my MERRY CHRISTMAS to you, Mr. President.

MERRY CHRISTMAS

Show Image
(https://greetings-day.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Christmas_Snow_GIF_Animated.gif)


MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR TO YOU!

(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=93071.0;attach=184573;image)
Title: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 20 December 2017, 16:02:54
SO, HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT DOUGHNUTS? DO YOU LIKE TO EAT THEM WHEN YOU ARE POSTING ON GEEKHACK? OR HOW ABOUT WHEN LOOKING AT EBAY OR THE NEWS? POST YOUR THOUGHTS HERE.

I LIKE TO EAT DOUGHNUTS WHENEVER I GO ON THE COMPUTER.


(http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/2863/2863,1110081767,11/stock-photo-fat-person-using-the-computer-194016.jpg)
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jJFqy6yiXzQ/maxresdefault.jpg)
(https://clikandeat.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/donuts.jpg)
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: rowdy on Wed, 20 December 2017, 19:45:24
Still looks fine (for certain values of "fine") to me.

[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 21 December 2017, 16:26:56
DID YOU GENERATE THAT IN PHOTO SHOP?
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 21 December 2017, 16:27:19
ANY DONUT EATERS?
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: JP on Thu, 21 December 2017, 16:30:29
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: Findecanor on Thu, 21 December 2017, 17:07:41
No. I like eating donuts while drinking coffee. That requires both hands.
And, no sticky hands on my keyboard!
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: rowdy on Thu, 21 December 2017, 19:49:59
DID YOU GENERATE THAT IN PHOTO SHOP?

No, it is a simple screen capture of your post.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Thu, 21 December 2017, 20:02:35
(Attachment Link)

WINDOWS 98 IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS 10. IT DOESN'T SEND YOUR DATA TO BIG BROTHER! YET ANOTHER REASON TO ADOPT THAT FINE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Except for shiny "Active Desktop"..

DO YOU USE WINDOWS 98?

DO YOU READ SUTTER CANE?
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: noisyturtle on Thu, 21 December 2017, 21:56:09
have you ever had a boner when taking a **** and tried to piss in your mouth while sitting on the toilet?
Title: Re: TUCK FRUMP
Post by: Air tree on Thu, 21 December 2017, 23:14:20
sharing a video from a dude called "Fash Forever"  :))
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: schoolbus on Fri, 22 December 2017, 00:01:46
GEEKHACKS*
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 22 December 2017, 05:59:18
I DON'T BELIEVE THAT!
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: afrokobe on Fri, 22 December 2017, 11:41:41
have you ever had a boner and tried sticking a donut on it
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: skitty on Fri, 22 December 2017, 12:07:15
Unglazed donuts are disgusting.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: JP on Fri, 22 December 2017, 12:48:44
Apple fritter is where it's at.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: Waateva on Fri, 22 December 2017, 12:51:06
Custard long john, NOT cream long john.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 22 December 2017, 12:59:09
Custard long john, NOT cream long john.

U guys have gone dat dark side.

Classic jelly w/ granulated sugar top.. none of that new-age powdered sugar nonsense.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: microsoft windows on Fri, 22 December 2017, 13:29:25
Unglazed donuts are disgusting.

NO THEY'RE NOT
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: Waateva on Fri, 22 December 2017, 13:32:37
Custard long john, NOT cream long john.

U guys have gone dat dark side.

Classic jelly w/ granulated sugar top.. none of that new-age powdered sugar nonsense.

Gtfo, donuts aren't vegan.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: chyros on Fri, 22 December 2017, 13:38:18
Real doughnuts are roughly spherical. "Donuts", thought tasty, are an abomination :p .
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: Waateva on Fri, 22 December 2017, 13:42:11
Real doughnuts are roughly spherical. "Donuts", thought tasty, are an abomination :p .

Unlike you, I don't discriminate on my donuts, or "doughnuts" as you call them, based on their size or shape.  Instead, I choose to discriminate based on what's inside, as that is what really matters.
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 23 December 2017, 11:53:24
TWO MORE DAYS UNTIL CHRISTMAS

(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 23 December 2017, 11:53:58
(Attachment Link)

WINDOWS 98 IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS 10. IT DOESN'T SEND YOUR DATA TO BIG BROTHER! YET ANOTHER REASON TO ADOPT THAT FINE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Except for shiny "Active Desktop"..

DO YOU USE WINDOWS 98?

DO YOU READ SUTTER CANE?

DO YOU?
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: HotRoderX on Sat, 23 December 2017, 13:06:25
Why not Windows 98 SE  :eek:
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Sat, 23 December 2017, 16:39:18
Why not Windows 98 SE  :eek:

WINDOWS NINETY EIGHT SECOND EDITION IS A SUITABLE OPERATING SYSTEM. I THINK IT IS EXCELLENT. IT ALSO IS GOOD FOR SURFING THE NET WITH INTERNET EXPLORER 6. DO YOU USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6? IF YOU DON'T, YOU SHOULD START USING IT RIGHT NOW.
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: microsoft windows on Sun, 24 December 2017, 19:07:59
ONE MORE DAY!
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Mon, 01 January 2018, 23:46:22
(Attachment Link)

WINDOWS 98 IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS 10. IT DOESN'T SEND YOUR DATA TO BIG BROTHER! YET ANOTHER REASON TO ADOPT THAT FINE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Except for shiny "Active Desktop"..

DO YOU USE WINDOWS 98?

DO YOU READ SUTTER CANE?

DO YOU?

I probably would if he was real.
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: rowdy on Mon, 01 January 2018, 23:59:02
IE (or Edge) might become a fantastic browser one day, but no-one will ever know.
Title: Re: VHS or Betamax: Which do you prefer?
Post by: rowdy on Tue, 02 January 2018, 00:01:51
Betamax is the superior technology, but VHS has porn so I'm going with that

+1
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: rowdy on Tue, 02 January 2018, 00:37:15
have you ever had a boner and tried sticking a donut on it

"A" donut?  Singular?
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: os on Tue, 02 January 2018, 02:25:26
I really think it's time to put this logo on the site. The current one is so boring.

(Attachment Link)

You should make that a gif where the IEs fly around.
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: Findecanor on Tue, 02 January 2018, 02:31:07
If that's how you "glaze" your donuts, I don't want to know ...
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: rowdy on Tue, 02 January 2018, 03:14:47
Sorry, it's true.  Here's another one from Safari (Apple browser) on macOS.

[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: rowdy on Tue, 02 January 2018, 03:15:38
-7 DAYS UNTIL CHRISTMAS 2017!
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: rowdy on Tue, 02 January 2018, 03:19:04
I really think it's time to put this logo on the site. The current one is so boring.

(Attachment Link)

You should make that a gif where the IEs fly around.

Don't tempt him :p
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: rowdy on Tue, 02 January 2018, 03:33:34
If that's how you "glaze" your donuts, I don't want to know ...

/me never looks at a glazed donut the same way again.
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: Belfong on Tue, 02 January 2018, 03:39:02
Maybe try updating to the latest version of Internet Explorer.
QFT
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: daskeybo on Tue, 02 January 2018, 09:32:05
I really think it's time to put this logo on the site. The current one is so boring.

(Attachment Link)

3 year self bump?
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: os on Tue, 02 January 2018, 14:34:57
I really think it's time to put this logo on the site. The current one is so boring.

(Attachment Link)

You should make that a gif where the IEs fly around.

Don't tempt him :p

Why? I just thought I'd make my first post here about bringing in constructive feedback.
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: rowdy on Tue, 02 January 2018, 20:29:31
Maybe try updating to the latest version of Internet Explorer.
QFT

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/17621/internet-explorer-downloads
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 07:35:03
Maybe try updating to the latest version of Internet Explorer.
QFT

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/17621/internet-explorer-downloads

I WILL ONLY USE INTERNET EXPLORER 6. NO OTHER WEB BROWSERS EXCEPT FOR MSIE 5 ARE ACCEPTABLE FOR MY USE. TO HELL WITH GOOGLE CHROME AND FIRE-FOX!
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 07:36:19
I really think it's time to put this logo on the site. The current one is so boring.

(Attachment Link)

You should make that a gif where the IEs fly around.

Don't tempt him :p

Why? I just thought I'd make my first post here about bringing in constructive feedback.

I THINK THAT IS A BRILLIANT IDEA. DOES ANYBODY KNOW OF ANY FREE AND EASY-TO-USE GIF ANIMATION TOOLS?
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 07:39:10
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)

I HOPE EVERYBODY ENJOYED THEIR CHRISTMAS. NOW IT IS TIME TO COUNT DOWN TO CHRISTMAS 2018. DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW MANY DAYS ARE LEFT UNTIL THAT DAY ARRIVES?

(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)
Title: Re: DO YOU LIKE TO EAT DONUTS WHILE USING THE COMPUTER?
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 07:42:49
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)
I RAN OUT OF DONUTS TODAY. I NEED TO GET SOME MORE AFTER WORK.
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)
Title: Re: Internet explorer 6 will never die
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 07:45:02
IE (or Edge) might become a fantastic browser one day, but no-one will ever know.

(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)
EDGE IS OVERRATED. INTERNET EXPLORER 6 IS THE TRUE WEB BROWSERS. THE OTHERS ARE JUST FAKES. DON'T FALL FOR THEM!
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 07:46:08
(Attachment Link)

WINDOWS 98 IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS 10. IT DOESN'T SEND YOUR DATA TO BIG BROTHER! YET ANOTHER REASON TO ADOPT THAT FINE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Except for shiny "Active Desktop"..

DO YOU USE WINDOWS 98?

DO YOU READ SUTTER CANE?

DO YOU?

I probably would if he was real.

ARE YOU USING WINDOWS 98 NOW?
Title: Re: Geekhack Logo
Post by: os on Wed, 03 January 2018, 08:51:13
I really think it's time to put this logo on the site. The current one is so boring.

(Attachment Link)

You should make that a gif where the IEs fly around.

Don't tempt him :p

Why? I just thought I'd make my first post here about bringing in constructive feedback.

I THINK THAT IS A BRILLIANT IDEA. DOES ANYBODY KNOW OF ANY FREE AND EASY-TO-USE GIF ANIMATION TOOLS?


Just in case you are willing to use anything that does not run on Win98:
GIMP is great for gif animation: https://www.gimp.org/tutorials/Simple_Animations/
I've also used PhotoScape in the past but iirc it turned into an adware ****hole, so idk about that.
Title: Re: GOP TAX REFORM BILL
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 13:34:34
WELL, IT LOOKS LIKE THE TAX REFORM PASSED! ALSO LOOKS LIKE TRUMP AND BANNON ARE NO LONGER BUDDIES.  AND HILLARY AND HUMA ARE STILL NOT IN PRISON!
Title: Re: CATS & HOT DOGS
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 13:35:38
(Attachment Link)

THAT PICTURE IS FAKE NEWS

(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=93073.0;attach=184585;image)
Title: Re: VHS or Betamax: Which do you prefer?
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 13:36:14
OOPS, I FORGOT TO ADD LASERDISC AS AN OPTION. SHOULD I MAKE A NEW THREAD?

(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=93073.0;attach=184585;image)
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 13:37:12
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 13:40:22
WELL, IT LOOKS LIKE THE ISLAMIC MIGRANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR 92% OF THE RECENT INCREASE IN VIOLENT CRIME IN GERMANY. ANY THOUGHTS?

https://www.infowars.com/bombshell-study-migrants-caused-92-violent-crime-increase-in-germany/
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: Duckyreddy on Wed, 03 January 2018, 14:09:36
Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


I HOPE EVERYBODY ENJOYED THEIR CHRISTMAS. NOW IT IS TIME TO COUNT DOWN TO CHRISTMAS 2018. DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW MANY DAYS ARE LEFT UNTIL THAT DAY ARRIVES?

Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


Dear President of Geekhack, There are only 354 days to go until December 25th of 2018.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: iri on Wed, 03 January 2018, 15:19:38
It's the second worst refugee crisis after WWII.
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: rowdy on Wed, 03 January 2018, 16:06:37
Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


I HOPE EVERYBODY ENJOYED THEIR CHRISTMAS. NOW IT IS TIME TO COUNT DOWN TO CHRISTMAS 2018. DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW MANY DAYS ARE LEFT UNTIL THAT DAY ARRIVES?

Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


Dear President of Geekhack, There are only 354 days to go until December 25th of 2018.

354 days to go and people have got their decorations up already!
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Wed, 03 January 2018, 16:09:17
(Attachment Link)

WINDOWS 98 IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS 10. IT DOESN'T SEND YOUR DATA TO BIG BROTHER! YET ANOTHER REASON TO ADOPT THAT FINE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Except for shiny "Active Desktop"..

DO YOU USE WINDOWS 98?

DO YOU READ SUTTER CANE?

DO YOU?

I probably would if he was real.

ARE YOU USING WINDOWS 98 NOW?

I must humbly submit to you that the possibility exists that Windows 98 is not the operating system that I am using at this precise moment in time.
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: chyros on Wed, 03 January 2018, 16:20:13
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
A good way to start is probably to deport everyone who says that :p .
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: Duckyreddy on Wed, 03 January 2018, 17:07:01
Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


I HOPE EVERYBODY ENJOYED THEIR CHRISTMAS. NOW IT IS TIME TO COUNT DOWN TO CHRISTMAS 2018. DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW MANY DAYS ARE LEFT UNTIL THAT DAY ARRIVES?

Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


Dear President of Geekhack, There are only 354 days to go until December 25th of 2018.

354 days to go and people have got their decorations up already!

that will be me
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: Findecanor on Wed, 03 January 2018, 17:11:19
My thought: You should not get your "news" from web sites with a far-right political agenda.
Title: Re: Islamic Terrorism/Extremism
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 17:20:35
My thought: You should not get your "news" from web sites with a far-right political agenda.

DOES THAT ALSO APPLY TO WEB SITES WITH FAR-LEFT POLITICAL AGENDAS?
Title: Re: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 17:21:26
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
A good way to start is probably to deport everyone who says that :p .

I WANT TO DEPORT EVERYONE WHO WORKS AT CRAPPLE AND ALL MAC USERS!
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 17:23:38
(Attachment Link)

WINDOWS 98 IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS 10. IT DOESN'T SEND YOUR DATA TO BIG BROTHER! YET ANOTHER REASON TO ADOPT THAT FINE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Except for shiny "Active Desktop"..

DO YOU USE WINDOWS 98?

DO YOU READ SUTTER CANE?

DO YOU?

I probably would if he was real.

ARE YOU USING WINDOWS 98 NOW?

I must humbly submit to you that the possibility exists that Windows 98 is not the operating system that I am using at this precise moment in time.

WELL, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU MAY NEED TO MAKE A FEW COMPUTING-RELATED CHANGES IN YOUR LIFE. I HOPE YOU'RE NOT USING A MAC!
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: microsoft windows on Wed, 03 January 2018, 17:26:33
Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


I HOPE EVERYBODY ENJOYED THEIR CHRISTMAS. NOW IT IS TIME TO COUNT DOWN TO CHRISTMAS 2018. DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW MANY DAYS ARE LEFT UNTIL THAT DAY ARRIVES?

Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


Dear President of Geekhack, There are only 354 days to go until December 25th of 2018.

354 days to go and people have got their decorations up already!

that will be me

I STILL HAVE MY CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS UP. WITH CHRISTMAS LESS THAN A YEAR AWAY, PERHAPS I SHOULD KEEP THEM UP TO BE PREPARED!
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: rowdy on Thu, 04 January 2018, 00:42:28
Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


I HOPE EVERYBODY ENJOYED THEIR CHRISTMAS. NOW IT IS TIME TO COUNT DOWN TO CHRISTMAS 2018. DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW MANY DAYS ARE LEFT UNTIL THAT DAY ARRIVES?

Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


Dear President of Geekhack, There are only 354 days to go until December 25th of 2018.

354 days to go and people have got their decorations up already!

that will be me

I STILL HAVE MY CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS UP. WITH CHRISTMAS LESS THAN A YEAR AWAY, PERHAPS I SHOULD KEEP THEM UP TO BE PREPARED!

Sadly it seems that Easter-related items are already in the shops.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Thu, 04 January 2018, 00:54:28
(Attachment Link)

WINDOWS 98 IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS 10. IT DOESN'T SEND YOUR DATA TO BIG BROTHER! YET ANOTHER REASON TO ADOPT THAT FINE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Except for shiny "Active Desktop"..

DO YOU USE WINDOWS 98?

DO YOU READ SUTTER CANE?

DO YOU?

I probably would if he was real.

ARE YOU USING WINDOWS 98 NOW?

I must humbly submit to you that the possibility exists that Windows 98 is not the operating system that I am using at this precise moment in time.

WELL, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU MAY NEED TO MAKE A FEW COMPUTING-RELATED CHANGES IN YOUR LIFE. I HOPE YOU'RE NOT USING A MAC!

It is always nice to have hope.
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: Belfong on Thu, 04 January 2018, 02:02:54
Why not Edge? It's from MS. Are you trying to avoid the question?
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Belfong on Thu, 04 January 2018, 02:04:56
Does using Windows 98 in a VM running on a Mac count?
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: Duckyreddy on Thu, 04 January 2018, 02:20:34
Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


I HOPE EVERYBODY ENJOYED THEIR CHRISTMAS. NOW IT IS TIME TO COUNT DOWN TO CHRISTMAS 2018. DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW MANY DAYS ARE LEFT UNTIL THAT DAY ARRIVES?

Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


Dear President of Geekhack, There are only 354 days to go until December 25th of 2018.

354 days to go and people have got their decorations up already!

that will be me

I STILL HAVE MY CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS UP. WITH CHRISTMAS LESS THAN A YEAR AWAY, PERHAPS I SHOULD KEEP THEM UP TO BE PREPARED!

Best time to purchase Christmas decorations is now, save your pennies and go to the shop now.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: rowdy on Thu, 04 January 2018, 02:22:47
Does using Windows 98 in a VM running on a Mac count?

At least that would work.  You would not be able to run macOS in a VM under Windows 98.
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: Coreda on Thu, 04 January 2018, 04:04:02
When life has you feeling blue
Resetting with a start up tune
Always checking Windows for surpri-ses
Come and drive up to the store
They're expecting you at tech support
This time it'll last you through the daaay!
"You know you could just buy a Mac."
"Did I really hear you say that?
"More than most you know this box has served me well."
"But it has so many problems!"
"And I'm paying you to solve them!
"Keep it quiet now and make them go awaaay!"
So now the situation's fine
For the computer and the client
Dithered blue skies to keep their mind at ease
Sure, but won't it break again?
Well how long's a piece of string?
They're contented now and that's what really ma-tters
So hearing a board tapping
They might just be a geek hacking
Boasting of a system flawless as can be
But we really know inside
Behind the messy lot of wires
The nostalgia is what really keeps them going
Title: Re: Windows 98
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 04 January 2018, 10:19:51
(Attachment Link)

WINDOWS 98 IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS 10. IT DOESN'T SEND YOUR DATA TO BIG BROTHER! YET ANOTHER REASON TO ADOPT THAT FINE OPERATING SYSTEM.

Except for shiny "Active Desktop"..

DO YOU USE WINDOWS 98?

DO YOU READ SUTTER CANE?

DO YOU?

I probably would if he was real.

ARE YOU USING WINDOWS 98 NOW?

I must humbly submit to you that the possibility exists that Windows 98 is not the operating system that I am using at this precise moment in time.

WELL, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU MAY NEED TO MAKE A FEW COMPUTING-RELATED CHANGES IN YOUR LIFE. I HOPE YOU'RE NOT USING A MAC!

It is always nice to have hope.

WINDOWS 98 WILL RESTORE HOPE AND PEACE TO MANKIND. START USING IT TODAY SO YOU CAN SOLVE WORLD HUNGER AND CURE CANCER!
Title: Re: I CAN'T GET COMIC SANS FONT TO WORK IN POSTS. THIS IS AN OUTRAGE! FIX THIS NOW!
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 04 January 2018, 10:24:13
Why not Edge? It's from MS. Are you trying to avoid the question?

I WILL NOT USE EDGE BECAUSE IT IS NOT DESIGNED FOR WINDOWS 98.

(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)
Title: Re: A Message from the President
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 04 January 2018, 10:25:28
Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


I HOPE EVERYBODY ENJOYED THEIR CHRISTMAS. NOW IT IS TIME TO COUNT DOWN TO CHRISTMAS 2018. DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW MANY DAYS ARE LEFT UNTIL THAT DAY ARRIVES?

Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=46529.0;attach=184575;image)


Dear President of Geekhack, There are only 354 days to go until December 25th of 2018.

354 days to go and people have got their decorations up already!

that will be me

I STILL HAVE MY CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS UP. WITH CHRISTMAS LESS THAN A YEAR AWAY, PERHAPS I SHOULD KEEP THEM UP TO BE PREPARED!

Best time to purchase Christmas decorations is now, save your pennies and go to the shop now.

THAT'S RIGHT! YOU CAN ALSO PURCHASE ONE OF MY INTERNET EXPLORER MOUSEPADS WHILE YOU ARE AT IT. LOOK FOR MY THREAD IN THE "INTEREST CHECKS" DISCUSSION BOARD.
Title: DONALD TRUMP NEEDS TO STOP USING MACS AND GET WINDOWS 98 RIGHT NOW
Post by: microsoft windows on Thu, 04 January 2018, 10:34:23
I WAS SURFING ON THE NETWORK OF TUBES TODAY, USING INTERNET EXPLORER 6, WHEN I CAME ACROSS SOME VERY DISTURBING IMAGES ONLINE.

BEWARE - VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED. DON'T LOOK AT THE FOLLOWING PHOTOGRAPHS IF THERE ARE CHILDREN IN THE ROOM WITH YOU.

[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=2]
[attachimg=3]

DONALD TRUMP NEEDS TO THROW HIS MACK BOOKS AWAY RIGHT NOW AND SWITCH TO WINDOWS 98. THE SECURITY OF OUR COUNTRY IS AT RISK! IF HE KEEPS USING CRAPPLE COMPUTERS, HIS E-MAILS MAY WIND UP GOING THE WAY OF HILLARY CLINTON'S. WE NEED TO TELL HIM RIGHT NOW THAT WINDOWS 98 IS THE ANSWER!

BELOW IS A PHOTO OF DONALD TRUMP USING MY PERSONAL COMPUTER. HE NEEDS TO GET RID OF THE MACK BOOKS IMMEDIATELY! THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!


[attachimg=4]
Title: Re: microsoft windows megathread
Post by: JP on Thu, 04 January 2018, 14:12:00
But Mac's don't get viruses, duh!
Title: Re: TLDR: use Windows 98, the Cult of (Formerly the microsoft windows megathread)
Post by: Belfong on Thu, 04 January 2018, 19:29:35
I thought he tweets using phones?
Title: Re: TLDR: use Windows 98, the Cult of (Formerly the microsoft windows megathread)
Post by: noisyturtle on Thu, 04 January 2018, 21:03:36
Win 98 is still a metric ton better than Ubuntu, I hate Ubuntu and Linux so much they make me want to punch the monitor every time a barebones simple feature that should be standard needs to be added. People are like "Oh but you have so much control and can make the environment anything you want" NO - **** YOU IT IS NOT CONVENIENT AT ALL.
Title: Re: TLDR: use Windows 98, the Cult of (Formerly the microsoft windows megathread)
Post by: iri on Fri, 05 January 2018, 09:18:47
Win 98 is still a metric ton better than Ubuntu, I hate Ubuntu and Linux so much they make me want to punch the monitor every time a barebones simple feature that should be standard needs to be added. People are like "Oh but you have so much control and can make the environment anything you want" NO - **** YOU IT IS NOT CONVENIENT AT ALL.
What are the barebones simple features that are present in Windows 98 that you miss from Ubuntu?
Title: Re: TLDR: use Windows 98, the Cult of (Formerly the microsoft windows megathread)
Post by: fanpeople on Fri, 05 January 2018, 10:16:11
Win 98 is still a metric ton better than Ubuntu, I hate Ubuntu and Linux so much they make me want to punch the monitor every time a barebones simple feature that should be standard needs to be added. People are like "Oh but you have so much control and can make the environment anything you want" NO - **** YOU IT IS NOT CONVENIENT AT ALL.
What are the barebones simple features that are present in Windows 98 that you miss from Ubuntu?

Farmville support
Title: Re: TLDR: use Windows 98, the Cult of (Formerly the microsoft windows megathread)
Post by: xtrafrood on Fri, 05 January 2018, 10:16:52
Nothing can replace the sound of a 56k baud modem connecting at 28k baud..