Are you implying that I can't comment if I am not involved in the design ?
I'm pointing out that sGhost has worked on a number of sets, has a great eye for detail, and is worth listening to as a result of these facts.
I'm also confused by your defensiveness in response to his feedback, which is well-intentioned and constructive, and can help the set's success. If you were invested in the success of GMK Taho, you would
want someone like him to share feedback and help improve the resulting product. But instead you're pushing back on it. I'm not sure why, so I questioned your relationship here.
After seeing more comments here, I seem to be justified - you're not contributing much to this IC beyond argumentativeness.
The gap between the mod colors are just 7, by the way. RAL 8001 and RAL 8008. Taho's alphas colors are just lighter as well.
For others following along, RAL's classic colors do not work the same way as RAL's design colors. The first digit of a K7 color do indicate a system code (eg. "8" is brown) but the last three numbers are simply sequential. Compare RAL 1011 for RAL 1013 for an example of two closely-numbered colors that differ significantly.
This differs from RAL D2, where the first triple indicates hue, and the last pair of doubles indicates chroma.