Author Topic: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating  (Read 58617 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hak Foo

  • Posts: 1270
  • Make America Clicky Again!
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #250 on: Tue, 05 June 2012, 22:09:51 »
Quote from: mkawa;607579
monitors love milkshakes

when you factor in the cost of a decent stand or arm and the possibility of panel defects, then add tax, i think these are less of a deal than a good new normal. the margins on IPS monitors in the US so far has been pretty high; HP happily charged 700+ for this same panel, maybe one grade higher. meanwhile, dell has been able to offer their T1 affiliates IPS monitor pricing that is literally 60% of their sale-adjusted retail price, while still making a per-unit profit!

anyway, i can only see good things coming of these. more cheap IPS panels in the US means more IPS panels in the US period.


The risk is, "will this be the model they follow?"

It's a lot like when 24" monitors got popular.  They started out with great panels, 1920x1200.  Then they started offering them with cheap TN panels, and then as 1920x1080.  Now I can buy a 24" LCD for $189, but a non-TN, 1920x1200 unit will set me back twice what I spent in 2008.
Overton130, Box Pale Blues.

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6288
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #251 on: Wed, 06 June 2012, 00:32:06 »
Quote from: Hak Foo;608297
Now I can buy a 24" LCD for $189, but a non-TN, 1920x1200 unit will set me back twice what I spent in 2008.
That's only because "twice what you spent in 2008" is what these 27" IPS ones cost now.

Offline mkawa

  •  No Marketplace Access
  • Posts: 6562
  • (ツ)@@@. crankypants
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #252 on: Wed, 06 June 2012, 00:38:20 »
Quote from: Hak Foo;608297
The risk is, "will this be the model they follow?"

It's a lot like when 24" monitors got popular.  They started out with great panels, 1920x1200.  Then they started offering them with cheap TN panels, and then as 1920x1080.  Now I can buy a 24" LCD for $189, but a non-TN, 1920x1200 unit will set me back twice what I spent in 2008.
good point. what's interesting about these is that they're not 1080p. 1080p panels in every size are unfortunately going to be the most common panel no matter what we want or do as enthusiasts..

still, a whole bunch of cheap ips 1080p panels wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. one video card can drive like 6 monitors now. huzzah!

Quote
What I don't understand is why they don't sell it as a 120hz monitor. GPUs and CPU's benefit from longer lifetimes, so I understand those being sold at a lower stock clock, but what reason is there to do this with a monitor?
i believe the panel elements themselves are not guaranteed to be able to refresh that quickly.
« Last Edit: Wed, 06 June 2012, 00:48:26 by mkawa »

to all the brilliant friends who have left us, and all the students who climb on their shoulders.

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #253 on: Fri, 08 June 2012, 07:32:24 »
So i think i am going to bite the bullet should I go for the catleap or the crossover?

Offline AKIMbO

  • HHKBro
  • Posts: 1778
  • Location: Tennessee
  • Know Topre, Know Peace. No Topre, No Peace.
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #254 on: Fri, 08 June 2012, 08:01:02 »
Quote from: TheProfosist;609693
So i think i am going to bite the bullet should I go for the catleap or the crossover?

Go crossover...but only if you are getting a 27 q or q-p.  It has much better build quality than the catleap.
Mkawa Beta SSK | IBM SSK | IBM Model AT F | IBM F 122 | IBM Unsaver | LZ-GH (62g ergo clears) | HHKB Pro2 Type-S | HHKB Pro2 | Realforce 87U-Silent (55g uniform) | Leopold FC660C | Omnikey 101 (blue alps) | Kingsaver (blue alps) | Zenith ZKB2 (green alps)
| KBD75 (box reds)

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #255 on: Fri, 08 June 2012, 08:17:57 »
Quote from: AKIMbO;609698
Go crossover...but only if you are getting a 27 q or q-p.  It has much better build quality than the catleap.
Is it really worth the $45? I plan to buy from green-sum. Catleap http://tinyurl.com/6p4mcoh Crossover http://tinyurl.com/cmtz3su

Also what do you all think of the extended warranty? Is it something that I should look into?

I think id also need a stand because i looks like both of them would sit really low on the desk. I was looking at this one http://tinyurl.com/7no8394

Offline AKIMbO

  • HHKBro
  • Posts: 1778
  • Location: Tennessee
  • Know Topre, Know Peace. No Topre, No Peace.
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #256 on: Fri, 08 June 2012, 09:00:50 »
Quote from: TheProfosist;609707
Is it really worth the $45? I plan to buy from green-sum. Catleap http://tinyurl.com/6p4mcoh Crossover http://tinyurl.com/cmtz3su

Also what do you all think of the extended warranty? Is it something that I should look into?

I think id also need a stand because i looks like both of them would sit really low on the desk. I was looking at this one http://tinyurl.com/7no8394

If you plan on using a VESA stand then you have to take off the bezel on the catleap to remove that stupid plastic bar they have covering the vesa holes.  Personally, I think the $45 is worth it.  I went with cross over instead of with catleap...solely for the metal monitor housing/bezel, better stand, and easy access to the VESA mounting holes.
Mkawa Beta SSK | IBM SSK | IBM Model AT F | IBM F 122 | IBM Unsaver | LZ-GH (62g ergo clears) | HHKB Pro2 Type-S | HHKB Pro2 | Realforce 87U-Silent (55g uniform) | Leopold FC660C | Omnikey 101 (blue alps) | Kingsaver (blue alps) | Zenith ZKB2 (green alps)
| KBD75 (box reds)

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #257 on: Fri, 08 June 2012, 09:06:36 »
Quote from: AKIMbO;609723
If you plan on using a VESA stand then you have to take off the bezel on the catleap to remove that stupid plastic bar they have covering the vesa holes.  Personally, I think the $45 is worth it.  I went with cross over instead of with catleap...solely for the metal monitor housing/bezel, better stand, and easy access to the VESA mounting holes.
Makes sense, I think ill probably grab the crossover then when I do bite.

Offline mSSM

  • Posts: 50
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #258 on: Fri, 08 June 2012, 13:36:48 »
So all the cool kids go for the Crossover 27q led-p? If I want to replace the foot stand anyhow, I can just get the Cross 27q led (non-p), is that right?

Too bad there is only one guy selling the 27q with Pixel Perfect guarantee:
http://www.ebay.de/itm/CROSSOVER-27Q-LED-Perfect-Pixel-2560x1440-QHD-DVI-D-Dual-LG-S-IPS-27-Monitor-/120926762189?pt=Computer_Monitors&hash=item1c27cbf4cd

What do people think of the Achieva Shimian and, since recently, the Potalion?



EDIT: That guy who is selling the 27q in the link I gave actually promises to have grade A+ panels. Hmmm.... Does anyone here have experience with those?
« Last Edit: Fri, 08 June 2012, 13:43:24 by mSSM »

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6288
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #259 on: Sat, 09 June 2012, 00:38:16 »
I've worked on a couple apple cinema displays. The motherboards aren't fun to replace and the panel is somewhat heavy (just like the iMac: Heavy)

But I don't have any real experience other than that, sorry.

Offline Hak Foo

  • Posts: 1270
  • Make America Clicky Again!
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #260 on: Wed, 13 June 2012, 00:23:05 »
Just pulled the trigger on a Catleap.  I spent the ridiculous premium for a tested perfect specimen ($375 vs. $310 or so to take your chances)

I suspect I'll be repurposing my 24" Soyo Topaz S, either passing it to a family member for their PC, or setting it up with a box to use as a TV (another family member has a 17" CRT from 1986; it soldiers on in spite of sitting where the toilet flooded some years ago, but the conversion box quality is mediocre).

The one thing which annoyed me is the relatively poor input selection.  Even if I paid another 90 bucks or so for the multi-input model, it's just VGA and HDMI.  I recall in the old days, some of the fancier LCDs came with S-video and composite in, maybe even component.  It would be nice to wire up the old Famiclone...

Someone should make a passthrough box that takes DVI and can overlay any of an array of inputs.  And sell it for about $50.
Overton130, Box Pale Blues.

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6288
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #261 on: Wed, 13 June 2012, 01:12:52 »
Quote from: Hak Foo;612471
Someone should make a passthrough box that takes DVI and can overlay any of an array of inputs.  And sell it for about $50.
Not at this resolution: Decoding that much video would surely take a beefy chip. Such a thing would likely be more expensive, though I wonder if one can make video-input to a normal (old) computer and just use that. A Pentium 4 would probably have enough power to do it, even undervolted some for lower power consumption.

Still, I imagine it'd be much easier to stream all your data over a network, and just get a video card with the proper outputs for the computer attached to it.

Offline Hak Foo

  • Posts: 1270
  • Make America Clicky Again!
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #262 on: Wed, 13 June 2012, 01:52:05 »
So I shoulld fire up the Sandy Bridge PC with a 650 watt power supply to process an image that a normal television has no trouble displaying?  The technology for cheap PiP composition has been around since the 80s at least-- especially if you offer it with some compromises (i. e. "only a 640x480 window or full-screen pillarboxed")
Overton130, Box Pale Blues.

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #263 on: Sun, 04 November 2012, 02:02:45 »
Is anyone still buying these?

Offline MissileMike

  • Posts: 280
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #264 on: Sun, 04 November 2012, 04:47:42 »
I recently bought the Microcenter Auria 27"...  I tested it in-store for dead pixels and there were none.  Lots of different inputs and no problems here in the first month of using it.  I think that makes it worth the 400$ for sure.
BS: 5 Space Savers  ||  9 42H  ||  10 1391401 or similar  ||  1x 1390131  || AT&T 305b  ||  Dell Model M
Cherry: Leopold FC200RC/AB  ||  3 Ducky 1087  ||  PLU ML87 ||  Cherry G80-8113LUVEU-2  browns
Alps: Filco Zero Tenkeyless (fukka)  ||  ABS M1  ||  3x Dell AT101w  ||  Ancer KF-191  ||  6 Vivanco Compact
Misc: NMB RT6855T+  ||  NMB RT101 Space Invader  ||  Dell Quietkey  ||  Ge Fanuc Industrial Metal

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #265 on: Sun, 04 November 2012, 14:11:42 »
I recently bought the Microcenter Auria 27"...  I tested it in-store for dead pixels and there were none.  Lots of different inputs and no problems here in the first month of using it.  I think that makes it worth the 400$ for sure.
yea bought one of those for a friend nice screen crappy stand

Offline HolidaySHRIMP

  • Posts: 136
$400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #266 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 07:56:37 »
Those nixeus 27 are on amazon now too for $500. All positive reviews. Thinking of going this route myself.

Offline mkawa

  •  No Marketplace Access
  • Posts: 6562
  • (ツ)@@@. crankypants
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #267 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 08:14:52 »
I recently bought the Microcenter Auria 27"...  I tested it in-store for dead pixels and there were none.  Lots of different inputs and no problems here in the first month of using it.  I think that makes it worth the 400$ for sure.
yea bought one of those for a friend nice screen crappy stand
protip: works well on an ergotron LX

to all the brilliant friends who have left us, and all the students who climb on their shoulders.

Offline bavman

  • Posts: 529
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #268 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 10:00:28 »
I'd still go with the ebay route. You can find Achieva "perfect pixel" editions on there for around $350...and just under $300 if you wanna take a gamble with the regular ones.

Offline alaricljs

  • I be WOT'ing all day...
  • ** Moderator Emeritus
  • Posts: 3715
  • Location: NE US
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #269 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 10:04:57 »
Grrrr.. so tempting  Wonder if my video card can hack it.
Filco w/ Imsto thick PBT
Ducky 1087XM PCB+Plate, w/ Matias "Quiet Click" spring-swapped w/ XM Greens

Offline mkawa

  •  No Marketplace Access
  • Posts: 6562
  • (ツ)@@@. crankypants
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #270 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 10:17:32 »
oh, and i totally forgot the ultimate protip: this is an ergotron LX, just rebranded.

http://www.amazon.com/HP-BT861AT-Single-Monitor-Arm/dp/B00455GH58/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&qid=1352132187&sr=8-8&keywords=ergotron+lx

to all the brilliant friends who have left us, and all the students who climb on their shoulders.

Offline Binge

  • Island of Sandy Beaches
  • * Maker
  • Posts: 3269
  • Location: Binge Haüs
  • With Gentle Time. I Feel Very Nice.
    • Hunger Work Studio
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #271 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 10:19:06 »
These monitors were a huge hit on Techpowerup.  I've seen one in person and even if it isn't a 120Hz model it is a true IPS display.  Looks gorgeous with a tight pixel pitch.
60% keyboards, 100% of the time.

"What the hell Jimmy?!  It was ruined before you even put it up there with your decrepit fingers."

Offline kmiller8

  • Banned
  •  Post Reporting Timeout
  • Posts: 1589
  • Who is that kmiller8 guy?
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #272 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 10:19:42 »
Grrrr.. so tempting  Wonder if my video card can hack it.

Correct me if in wrong but only the first few batches of these korean monitors allied you to overcook beyond 60hz. None of the current products will allow you to overclpck from a hardware standpoint :(

Offline mkawa

  •  No Marketplace Access
  • Posts: 6562
  • (ツ)@@@. crankypants
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #273 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 10:27:56 »
he's wondering whether his (pathetic, by the way) video card can render your basic copy of bejeweled at such a high resolution, not whether he can overclock the monitor.

to all the brilliant friends who have left us, and all the students who climb on their shoulders.

Offline alaricljs

  • I be WOT'ing all day...
  • ** Moderator Emeritus
  • Posts: 3715
  • Location: NE US
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #274 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 10:59:58 »
damnit, Plants vs Zombies, get it right man.
Filco w/ Imsto thick PBT
Ducky 1087XM PCB+Plate, w/ Matias "Quiet Click" spring-swapped w/ XM Greens

Offline mkawa

  •  No Marketplace Access
  • Posts: 6562
  • (ツ)@@@. crankypants
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #275 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 11:06:02 »
well that's your problem right there. you should be playing bejeweled  :p

to all the brilliant friends who have left us, and all the students who climb on their shoulders.

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #276 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 16:13:17 »
I recently bought the Microcenter Auria 27"...  I tested it in-store for dead pixels and there were none.  Lots of different inputs and no problems here in the first month of using it.  I think that makes it worth the 400$ for sure.
yea bought one of those for a friend nice screen crappy stand
protip: works well on an ergotron LX
wil inform the person I got it for.

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #277 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 16:14:58 »
alaricljs what gpu are you running?

Offline alaricljs

  • I be WOT'ing all day...
  • ** Moderator Emeritus
  • Posts: 3715
  • Location: NE US
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #278 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 16:42:10 »
uuuuh, 6870, had to look it up.
Filco w/ Imsto thick PBT
Ducky 1087XM PCB+Plate, w/ Matias "Quiet Click" spring-swapped w/ XM Greens

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #279 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 16:56:06 »
should be more than enough jujst dont forget the duallink dvi cable

Offline alaricljs

  • I be WOT'ing all day...
  • ** Moderator Emeritus
  • Posts: 3715
  • Location: NE US
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #280 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 18:13:22 »
Got those set, running a pair of dell 24's right now... 2407 and 2408
Filco w/ Imsto thick PBT
Ducky 1087XM PCB+Plate, w/ Matias "Quiet Click" spring-swapped w/ XM Greens

Offline mkawa

  •  No Marketplace Access
  • Posts: 6562
  • (ツ)@@@. crankypants
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #281 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 18:53:55 »
aren't those single link?

to all the brilliant friends who have left us, and all the students who climb on their shoulders.

Offline alaricljs

  • I be WOT'ing all day...
  • ** Moderator Emeritus
  • Posts: 3715
  • Location: NE US
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #282 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 20:02:26 »
yeah, but I plan for the future... 15' fully populated DVI-D/A cables.  So my ergotron's are all nice and smexy.
Filco w/ Imsto thick PBT
Ducky 1087XM PCB+Plate, w/ Matias "Quiet Click" spring-swapped w/ XM Greens

Offline metafour

  • Posts: 667
  • Location: Los Angeles
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #283 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 20:18:29 »
I recently bought the Microcenter Auria 27"...  I tested it in-store for dead pixels and there were none.  Lots of different inputs and no problems here in the first month of using it.  I think that makes it worth the 400$ for sure.

My local microcenter had an open box one for ~$260 the other day. I was like 10 seconds too late. Still stuck on a 19" here.

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #284 on: Mon, 05 November 2012, 23:21:19 »
I recently bought the Microcenter Auria 27"...  I tested it in-store for dead pixels and there were none.  Lots of different inputs and no problems here in the first month of using it.  I think that makes it worth the 400$ for sure.

My local microcenter had an open box one for ~$260 the other day. I was like 10 seconds too late. Still stuck on a 19" here.
sucks!

Offline gliy

  • Posts: 41
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #285 on: Tue, 06 November 2012, 00:15:42 »
aren't those single link?
Nope they are dual link. Heres a list of recommended cards: http://thecomvi.com/ROCK/DOA.jpg

I have the crossover monitor, and I must say it is beautiful. Mine has one dead pixel, but with 1440p you cant notice it unless you put your face like 1 inch away from the monitor and search for dead pixels.

Offline bavman

  • Posts: 529
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #286 on: Wed, 07 November 2012, 19:00:57 »
Even cards that aren't listed as recommended will work as long as they support 2560x1600 (im pretty sure any GPU made in the past 5 years will) and has dual-link DVI.
I had no problem running my monitor with a 5850 even though most ebay sellers list it as incompatible.

Offline kaiserreich

  • HHKB Elite
  • Posts: 880
  • Location: Malaysia
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #287 on: Wed, 07 November 2012, 19:32:06 »
Even cards that aren't listed as recommended will work as long as they support 2560x1600 (im pretty sure any GPU made in the past 5 years will) and has dual-link DVI.
I had no problem running my monitor with a 5850 even though most ebay sellers list it as incompatible.

My hd5850 is working on these monitors too.
It's just that I have a dark screen until windows starts up. No BIOS access.

Offline bavman

  • Posts: 529
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #288 on: Wed, 07 November 2012, 19:57:23 »
Even cards that aren't listed as recommended will work as long as they support 2560x1600 (im pretty sure any GPU made in the past 5 years will) and has dual-link DVI.
I had no problem running my monitor with a 5850 even though most ebay sellers list it as incompatible.

My hd5850 is working on these monitors too.
It's just that I have a dark screen until windows starts up. No BIOS access.

Yeah I heard that some people with 5850/5870s had that problem. I didn't experience this, though my card was non-ref so that might have something to do with it.

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6288
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #289 on: Thu, 08 November 2012, 00:29:03 »
Even cards that aren't listed as recommended will work as long as they support 2560x1600 (im pretty sure any GPU made in the past 5 years will) and has dual-link DVI.
I had no problem running my monitor with a 5850 even though most ebay sellers list it as incompatible.

My hd5850 is working on these monitors too.
It's just that I have a dark screen until windows starts up. No BIOS access.
That's what PS2 keyboards and CRT's were made for. I use a CRT as a footrest for this reason. I was looking into what sort of GPU you need to actually get decent framerates out of a game at this resolution, and it seems I'm looking at about $250-$300 for a 7850/7970 or a gtx660. If I want to cheap out, is the best idea to just run games at low resolution (Which I do anyway on my CRT)? To be honest, I really only want this for use as movies/everyday use/having many windows open at once/etc.

Oh, I also keep CRT's around 'cause they can do 1024*768 at 119Hz. That and contrast ratio, no lag, price (free), etc.

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #290 on: Thu, 15 November 2012, 03:41:58 »
I never had a nice crt still kinda looking for one to this day. It would also be a dream of mine to own one of those widscreen professional ones.

Offline BossBorot

  • Posts: 90
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #291 on: Thu, 15 November 2012, 14:39:38 »
I had a fw-900 crt (24" 16:10 >1080p) before going for ips screens (plp 20 - 30 - 20 at home and 27 at work) and while it was nice it just cant hold a candle to what is out now in my opinion. The only thing I really miss is the black levels all of the other pros, at least to me, where not worth the trade offs.

Resolution is king and even the best crts cant do 2560x1600 or similar resolutions well even with overclocking.
« Last Edit: Thu, 15 November 2012, 14:43:48 by BossBorot »

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6288
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #292 on: Fri, 16 November 2012, 01:32:42 »
Just for reference, the Sony GDM-FW900 (mine was rebranded as an HP 2132A) can do 1920*1200 at 85 Hz. At that refresh rate, I recommend a seriously HQ VGA cable or use the BNC inputs. Best part about good CRT's is that I can get them for free out of the E-waste pile. My FW-900 was stripped for parts after it developed a whine. Currently I am using an Apple 21" CRT (Diamondtron, I think) and a viewsonic (Diamondtron for sure). They can do upwards of 110Hz at some resolutions, and I would not consider using any CRT below 75 Hz.

Right now, I'm getting a video card. In 2013 I'll get one of these monitors. What's been putting me off is that I see a lot of apple products at work, and I was not impressed with the 27" iMac or the apple cinema/thunderbolt displays. The (Supposedly IPS) displays on high-end Lenovos do look nice, though.

I have been doing some reading into these monitors, and hopefully they won't be too expensive when I finally buy one.

Offline nullstring

  • Posts: 267
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #293 on: Fri, 16 November 2012, 01:37:43 »
I haven't read through the whole thread, but if you've yet to see this:
http://slickdeals.net/f/5411750-Heads-Up-Monoprice-to-introduce-27-2560-x1440-IPS-Monitor-by-end-of-year?&page=2

I'm going to wait for monoprice to release one of these before buying one.

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #294 on: Fri, 16 November 2012, 01:46:06 »
The one from microcenter is already pretty cheap idk how much cheaper the monoprice one will be.

Offline nullstring

  • Posts: 267
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #295 on: Fri, 16 November 2012, 01:48:00 »
The one from microcenter is already pretty cheap idk how much cheaper the monoprice one will be.

It won't be, but I don't have a microcenter around here and I am worried about returning it if I buy it online.

Offline TheProfosist

  • Posts: 3671
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Custom Layouts Only!
Re: Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #296 on: Fri, 16 November 2012, 01:54:22 »
The one from microcenter is already pretty cheap idk how much cheaper the monoprice one will be.

It won't be, but I don't have a microcenter around here and I am worried about returning it if I buy it online.
i wouldnt be worried as long as your under warrenty just contact them startup an RMA and ship it back like you would with anyother company?

Offline damorgue

  • Posts: 1176
  • Location: Sweden
    • Personal portfolio
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #297 on: Sun, 06 January 2013, 18:02:38 »
I have been thinking of adding a larger display to my Dell 2410 for a while now, and replacing my crappy secondary.

-Can someone more in touch with the recent events enlighten me on how many of these models havea glass surface? I really like the idea that it can easily be cleaned and the glossy surface.

-Does anyone know how to disaple the power features on displayport. I began to hate it and switched back to DVI because it wouldn't allow me to turn off one diplay awhilst keeping the other one turned on.

Is there any model which has:
-Glass front
-16:10 <-- seems uncommon
-Nice colours, ie IPS
-27"-30"

and also if possible, but not necessary:
-overclockable to ~120Hz
-nice stand (tiltable, height, rotateable etc)

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6288
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #298 on: Mon, 07 January 2013, 00:43:23 »
16:10 would be 2560*1600, which is more commonly seen on 30" panels, as far as I know. Most of these are the 27" 16:9 2560*1440. I don't personally know of any cheap 16:10 ones, but that's no reason to think they don't exist or are even hard to find. As far as not-cheap ones, I think Dell, at least has one.

The apple cinema Display that features the same panel has a nice glass front, some USB ports, and even has a fan inside it. They look very sharp with apple products.

I believe I saw somewhere that some models of the cheap korean 2560*1440 monitors come with glass, which would satisfy (most of) your requirements too.

That's the extent of my research. I didn't really look into 16:10 that much, mainly 'cause it was so much more expensive.
---


I have a question for the crowd. I've seen a lot of different laptop panels, and I have some issues with many (newer MBP displays are common, and exhibit this). I can see them flickering! I'm pretty sure the same goes for the apple cinema display, but I haven't worked on one in a while to double check. I keep CRT's at home, and I can't abide anything under 77Hz, and often 77 is too low. I guess my flicker threshold is really high. My main monitor is kept at 1600*1200@85, which is great. (It can do 1024*768@200 Hz, but that resolution is too low. I tried it just for fun once.)

Other than getting an expensive one from 120hz.net, is there a way to get one of these cheaply that can do 75-80Hz? I'm pretty sure that'll be enough to not annoy me.
« Last Edit: Mon, 07 January 2013, 00:53:59 by dorkvader »

Offline alaricljs

  • I be WOT'ing all day...
  • ** Moderator Emeritus
  • Posts: 3715
  • Location: NE US
Re: $400 IPS 2560x1440 Monitor - Glossy = No AG Coating
« Reply #299 on: Mon, 07 January 2013, 01:04:02 »
You really shouldn't see LCD refresh flicker... but you MIGHT be seeing the back light flicker.  Newer MBPs are all LED tho, right?  Have you fiddled with the brightness to see if the flicker changes speed?  :)
Filco w/ Imsto thick PBT
Ducky 1087XM PCB+Plate, w/ Matias "Quiet Click" spring-swapped w/ XM Greens