Alright Mr. Yang. So you're saying YANG WANG right?
This name stuff is pretty confusing, at first I thought you were being a bit racist, but I'm guessing there was an "Andrew WANG", KappaKapps is "Andrew Yang" as he disclosed, and this "Andrew WANG" individual is the Pacifist that everyone seem to hate?
"So you're saying YANG WANG right?" -> what did you mean by this? (as it is, without context, it seems a bit offensive)
I read the conversation, but I couldn't pinpoint where the Yang/Wang stuff came up from
Yes. This is correct, it is 2 different people. Pacifist (Wang) was hired as a consultant/designer. Because he was banned for multiple accounts, we did not think it would be a problem since we did not give him access to our GeekHack.
Does this place have any moderators?
I know you removed this, but yes, this place does have moderators. Hence all the discussion above.
It is not threadcrapping to bring up valid concerns about a potential banned member attempting to run a group buy, and frankly I'm not sure how you see it as such.
Maybe he's another banned member
PS: this interview is relevant https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RX6ysvYh67GCdlg7x_VYU3uldxJGYjjQMNe5xAAA6Bk/ we see the two members of kappkapps are partners one AY and one AW thats not exactly the way the relationship has been described in this thread
In that interview we stated we were working with other designers. Personally, I don't think it's fair to base the number of people in a business/project based off of a single interview.
The snippet at the top was not written by us, but the editor of the interview.
For example, an interview with Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak does not mean that Jobs and Wozniak are the sole members of a company.
Secondly, the word "partner" was only mentioned once in the whole interview and was used in a joking manner. It's probably easier to say you are working with X person, as opposed to X person is one of our designers/consultants. There are other members of the team, and I would be happy to introduce the mod team or you to them.
Seems like even if this goes to GB stage it's not going to reach MOQ with all this drama, maybe waiting to see how kappa handles the blue mods will give the community a bit of a confidence boost in him? If he fulfills his role correctly that is.
So why not wait until after that to run this GB, if everyone's happy with how that was handled? Or would that not be enough? I honestly haven't been around for it to know enough.
While we understand that there may be trust issues,
most of the allegations made in the thread are by people who
have not dealt with us financially.
We've never missed an order(I can give proof to mods). But, you might say "those are only artisans, what about large volume?" In that case, we've tipped billnye's Electric Bluegaloo groupbuy considerably.
(175+ sets and 600+ ESC keys). If we were to scam, why would we have invested this amount of money into the GB community?
Understandably there still may be trust issues, thus we are planning to instate a "pay half now, pay half after you receive" type of deal. Currently we are working on the logistics/system of this (perhaps middleman).
The bottom line is: We trust you, the consumer, to use your best judgement in making decisions for this GB.