geekhack Marketplace > Interest Checks
[IC] Go-Ace68 | Redesign a 68-key gasket keyboard, GB ends on Oct 14
Findecanor:
I would call this layout "70%". The difference between having a 2×2 nav cluster to the typical 65%'s column (or sometimes just two keys) is significant to some users.
Zanhana:
sorry but there is literally nothing that specializes your run-of-the-mill 65% board for coding/programming
this is just another 65 and it doesn't even look like an especially good one
ggggggg:
Your hotswap pcb's bottom row is .25u narrower than the solderable version lol.
Nuap:
The keyboard for coding problem was already solved well by the HHKB, this seems like a step back from your stated intention of fixing the problem of "frequent keys are not placed within a natural range for convenient typing". If that's the intention then why have gaps between clusters at all?
This layout is literally a copy of the layout of the Saka68 and Ikki68. You don't get to disparage "standard layout" when you're using a layout like this.
Baka Bot:
--- Quote from: Nuap on Thu, 29 July 2021, 19:29:02 ---The keyboard for coding problem was already solved well by the HHKB, this seems like a step back from your stated intention of fixing the problem of "frequent keys are not placed within a natural range for convenient typing". If that's the intention then why have gaps between clusters at all?
This layout is literally a copy of the layout of the Saka68 and Ikki68. You don't get to disparage "standard layout" when you're using a layout like this.
--- End quote ---
because its for "coding" because of the weight on the back, therefore coding.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version