geekhack

geekhack Community => Ergonomics => Topic started by: FunkTrooper on Sat, 16 January 2010, 09:48:09

Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: FunkTrooper on Sat, 16 January 2010, 09:48:09
So, what does geekhack think of this: http://www.trulyergonomic.com/

I think it looks rather nice. It'll have some sort of Cherry Switch, and the layout looks nice. I'd like to see more emphasis on not having to leave the home row though, like more modifier keys, and embedder arrow keys and page up/down etc. (like Happy Hacking, but with better key placement)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: ch_123 on Sat, 16 January 2010, 09:59:17
The staggering of the keys is interesting. I assume this is to accomodate the different lengths of the fingers you are meant to use the particular column of keys with... but I thought that it was good ergonomic practice to type with your fingers angled downwards, which somewhat negates the fact that your fingers are of a different length, and would probably just be confusing to use.

(http://www.seating-ergonomics.com/images/keyboard2.gif)

That said, ergonomics is not something that I read into much asides from the basics.

Oh, and get ready for the standard Webwit "It's not ergonomic unless you can adjust the angle of the keyboard" rant.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Mental Hobbit on Sat, 16 January 2010, 12:56:04
Keys for the longest fingers elevated, keys for the shortest fingers recessed?
I don't get that.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: didjamatic on Sat, 16 January 2010, 13:00:01
I like the copy/cut/paste keys.  At a glance I don't like the / \ key locations, but maybe I could get used to it.  The home/end/pgup/pgdn location is interesting.

I think this layout would be pretty easy to learn

Can't do 1 handed ctrl alt del so that's a negative for me
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: quadibloc on Sat, 16 January 2010, 13:35:05
Adjusting the staggering of the keys for the lengths of the fingers has happened before. The Palantype keyboard - which is the layout normally used in Britain for syllable chord typing for court reporting and closed captioning, the way Stenotype is used in America - was laid out in that fashion.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: ricercar on Sat, 16 January 2010, 16:41:44
I hope the US doesn't continue with Palintype politicking.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: spolia optima on Sat, 16 January 2010, 17:30:29
I hope they change the legends to Palatino Linotype.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: djones on Sat, 16 January 2010, 22:18:45
Unless the split is adjustable, it's not 'truly ergonomic' to anyone but the few people who happen to anatomically match the angel of the split.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: JasonFruit on Sun, 17 January 2010, 09:18:35
"Angel of the split" calls up so many mental pictures . . .
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: itlnstln on Mon, 18 January 2010, 08:05:23
I don't like where the page nav and arrow keys are.  I think I would be accidently pressing them quite often.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Mon, 18 January 2010, 08:43:43
Quote from: itlnstln;151758
I don't like where the page nav and arrow keys are.  I think I would be accidently pressing them quite often.


That's exactly what I thought when I first saw it. Those keys could be moved down a little to separate them from the main typing keys.

But the more I think about it, the more I suspect it wouldn't be a problem. You never hit space when you aim for C or V on a standard keyboard, do you? Maybe with practice, those keys would be in the ideal place - very easy to reach.  I really want to try one of these out.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: itlnstln on Mon, 18 January 2010, 08:45:35
I'm a palm rester, though.  It's not that I think I am going to hit them with a finger but with my palm.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: hyperlinked on Tue, 19 January 2010, 02:19:47
Quote from: itlnstln;151766
I'm a palm rester, though.  It's not that I think I am going to hit them with a finger but with my palm.


So.... I don't know what your hands look like, but it seems to me that even as a palm rester that it might not be all that easy to accidentally hit those keys with your palm. I find the diamond arrow keys shape to be more of an issue. I have a hell of a time with anything that's not an inverted T.

Looks like an interesting idea for a keyboard though... kinda like a poor man's Maltron.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: hyperlinked on Tue, 19 January 2010, 05:32:27
Just noticed that Rajagra spotted this keyboard a few weeks ago:
http://geekhack.org/showthread.php?t=8245#5
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: hoggy on Fri, 26 February 2010, 14:09:39
There's a survey on the site so we can give feedback, but they don't have the courage or decency to invite feedback about features we don't like.

It's close - having features I like, but has lots of minor issues that I don't - most of which are listed above.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: trulyhealthy on Wed, 03 March 2010, 20:13:14
Quote from: ripster;151279
Poll results are tabulated by Nigerians.


Why the obsession with Nigerians?? Something to do with District 9?
:alien:

Quote from: hoggy;160955
There's a survey on the site so we can give feedback, but they don't have the courage or decency to invite feedback about features we don't like.


It might just be me, but they DO have the question “Features you would like to see added or don't like?” a good place to provide insight and features we wish for.
:ohwell:

Quote
.


As a remark, the directional arrow keys in diamond arrangement as per this keyboard (3 columns, 2 rows) is better than an inverted T; will just have to fine-tune some muscle memory. Not to be confused with the awful diamond arrangement used in the Natural Elite (2 columns, 3 rows).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: lal on Wed, 10 March 2010, 02:51:27
Quote from: trulyhealthy;161717
Why the obsession with Nigerians?? Something to do with District 9?


No (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigerian_connection).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: trievalot on Wed, 10 March 2010, 04:25:39
anyone done the 7 minute survey?
i only did the 2 min (took 1.5)

and it needs a giant trackball built in.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Sat, 07 August 2010, 00:42:01
I'm a new member here because I found the website for this keyboard and googling for more info on it found this thread.

Anyone have any feeling for how real / serious this company is?  They list August 12, 2010 as the pre-release order date.  I had my heart set on the Miniguru, but with that project canceled, this one looks interesting.  From earlier comments in this thread and a few other threads, seems they've made some changes based on feedback.  They say there will be a limited run of 1,000 keyboards made.

Makes me wonder why if they think they can be successful with only 1,000 units, why couldn't Miniguru be successful at 1,000 units.  I doubt the additional components amounted to that much of a difference in production costs.

I still would have preferred the Miniguru, though this keyboard's ergonomic concept is enticing.  I do like their idea of not having staggered keys, but rather having them placed in a row at the angle your hands/fingers are pointed.  I'm a pretty fast touch-typist, but it is definitely less natural for me to hit the keys off the home row using my left hand, being my fingers need to move off the the left/right rather than straight in the same direction my fingers are pointed.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Forsaken on Sat, 07 August 2010, 00:59:06
Seems they're not stating a price.... I do really like the design though.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Henry on Sun, 15 August 2010, 00:02:34
Pre-orders have started. $199 + shipping.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: chongyixiong on Sun, 15 August 2010, 03:50:44
Wow I like how you are able to customise your order to exactly your liking.

Key options:
Blank Keys
Lettered Keys (recommended)

Haha.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Sun, 15 August 2010, 10:00:18
I just happen to live in North Vancouver, BC, Canada.
 
Yep, we have a silicon valley.  2+ universities reknowned for engineering and compsci; about 2-3 dozen little software companies (including HQs for EA and Radical games); and hordes and hordes of genius cyborgs imported (sometimes illegally) from various parts of Asia and India.  Seems Canada is perceived as a sunny magical land of wealth, prosperity, and happiness to the rest of the world - though why they'd pick Vancouver is beyond me.  Plus our wimpy dollar and easily bribed political leaders make business in Canada a very attractive option for US investors.  Same reason we have "Hollywood North", also located in/around Vancouver.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: mr_a500 on Fri, 27 August 2010, 08:53:46
Quote from: Konrad;212816
I just happen to live in North Vancouver, BC, Canada.
 
Yep, we have a silicon valley.  2+ universities reknowned for engineering and compsci; about 2-3 dozen little software companies (including HQs for EA and Radical games); and hordes and hordes of genius cyborgs imported (sometimes illegally) from various parts of Asia and India.  Seems Canada is perceived as a sunny magical land of wealth, prosperity, and happiness to the rest of the world - though why they'd pick Vancouver is beyond me.  Plus our wimpy dollar and easily bribed political leaders make business in Canada a very attractive option for US investors.  Same reason we have "Hollywood North", also located in/around Vancouver.


That's funny. Apparently, we have two of each. "Hollywood North" also refers to Toronto - and "Canada's silicon valley" usually refers to Markham, Ontario. That's where ATI headquarters are (I've been there), IBM Canada, Digital/Compaq (before mergers), etc..

IBM headquarters even has it's own bridge ramps coming off the public streets! That's the only time I've ever seen a tech company with that kind of power to modify public roadwork.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Fri, 27 August 2010, 10:52:20
:smow: Great White North (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-ZvAVcBIrQ), tyvm
Title: Email contact
Post by: rantenki on Thu, 09 September 2010, 15:12:20
I did chat with them briefly over email. Very "form-lettery" response, but they mentioned that they will soon have a better deal on Canadian shipping.

I am going to ask if they can do a video of their prototype being typed on; to get a feel for the sound etc.

They clearly have a decent prototype made up...
(http://www.trulyergonomic.com/images/Mechanical_keycaps_Brown_Cherry.jpg)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: IndesisiveAvocaodes on Thu, 09 September 2010, 16:42:17
Useless post but I like how the Model M is all sepia'd out with the legendary and not so legendary keyboards.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: shrap on Thu, 09 September 2010, 17:07:52
Anyone else notice they dropped red Cherrys from their list of switches?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: lmnop on Thu, 09 September 2010, 17:11:55
it's because Cherry MX Red are in short supply.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: rantenki on Sat, 25 September 2010, 11:30:01
A bit more heckling leads to a bit more information. I asked the TE people if they had photos of an actual physical prototype...

(http://www.trulyergonomic.com/images/Truly_Ergonomic_Computer_Keyboard-2009-X2.jpg)

(http://www.trulyergonomic.com/images/Truly_Ergonomic_Computer_Keyboard-2009-X2_comparison.jpg)

So, I think the first image shows that they actually HAVE one, but no video of operation or anything, so it may be a mockup dummy board.

Also, the fact that they poured text all over it to cover it up makes me a touch suspicious. I think what is really going on here is that they don't have a production quality prototype, and they are hoping to pre-order and get a batch built in order to finance the next production run.

Also, I think they are pretty bad at marketing. I mean, look at their blog page. Reads like an email from Nigeria. Sheesh.

That said, I am still considering order one just because they have dropped the price into "speculative toy purchase territory".
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: rantenki on Sat, 25 September 2010, 11:43:49
Quote from: ripster;226617
I see photoshop.

Look at the edges of the shadow.  The Nigerians are getting good at PhotoShop.


Yeah; there is definitely some shooping going on there, the question is whether they shooped a rough prototype to make it look passable, or if they created it from a variety of M$ and Filco keyboards all mashed together.

I wonder if there is a 90 day refund window on Paypal, or some other reason they have that delay between payment and delivery...
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: JBert on Sat, 25 September 2010, 13:07:03
Quote from: rantenki;226616
Also, the fact that they poured text all over it to cover it up makes me a touch suspicious. I think what is really going on here is that they don't have a production quality prototype, and they are hoping to pre-order and get a batch built in order to finance the next production run.
I think this is higly likely.

I can understand though why they would be paranoid about their pictures: lowpoly posted the layout, and some chinese guy blatantly mashed it up to pimp his own layout.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: washuai on Mon, 27 September 2010, 03:40:50
Hiding the loss of red switches as a choice to black switches, by referring to it as the linear model is sneaky.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Tue, 05 October 2010, 09:38:58
Hmphf, I don't see photoshop.  I see 3D modeling.
Maybe that means the same things these days, unlike those sadly maligned Nigerians I have no clue what half the icons in photoshop are for.
 
Either way, it's still vapourware.  I would never buy a product whose existence hasn't been proven.  (And yeah, I don't invest in insurance, either, except as required by law, lol.)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: itlnstln on Tue, 05 October 2010, 10:43:42
I hated that movie.  Then again, I'm not much into Sci-Fi.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Tue, 05 October 2010, 10:46:16
Quote from: ripster;229983

Much Maligned Nigerians Preying On Illegal Aliens

I thought it was interesting that a movie with an anti-discrimination theme portrayed Nigerians as all being criminals and low-lifes..
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Tue, 05 October 2010, 11:30:04
lmao, I was immediately struck by the appearance of the wooden keyboard.  "Hmmm, that doesn't look quite right.  Weird, it looks more like a C64.  Almost." ... then looking left, for a standard keyboard to compare against ... aha, well look, a C64.
 
Too early in the morning for your mindgames, rip.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: chrs on Tue, 05 October 2010, 14:21:17
After some email back and forth, asking for either switch type or switch force specs, I got this:

Pre-load:  7-20 grams
Peak Force (Pf):  63gf +/- 10gf
Peak Travel (Ps):  1.1mm +/- 0.3mm
Total Travel (Ts):  3.0mm +/- 0.3mm
Contact Travel (Cs):  1.9mm +/- 0.3mm
Return Force (Rf):  >20gf
Bounce:  5ms

The 3 mm travel sounds like a Cherry ML...but the details don't match this Cherry spec page... (http://www.cherrycorp.com/english/switches/key/ml.htm)  and the front page at http://www.trulyergonomic.com/index.html says Cherry MX and shows browns.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Tue, 05 October 2010, 19:20:04
Quote from: Daniel Beaver;229991
I thought it was interesting that a movie with an anti-discrimination theme portrayed Nigerians as all being criminals and low-lifes..

I don't think it was really intended to have an anti-discrimination theme (other than there being bad guys in the plot.) Critics just seized on the South Africa location and assumed it was making a political point. I thought the choice of location was just clever in that it made the plot more credible (the government having the infrastructure in place to act that way.) I expected worse from the movie but ended up liking it. Good acting by the main character, started off being laughably pathetic but got serious as the plot thickened.

I was more forgiving of plot holes* than I was for Star Trek because ST had a reputation to hold up.

Besides, name any other movie that made you curious to know what cat food tasted like!

*Like why did none of the aliens use their weapons at any point?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Tue, 05 October 2010, 20:20:21
I just got an email a few minutes ago saying they're now accepting pre-orders.  I was under the impression that they already were, but maybe I was mistaken.  I'm quite interested in this board due to their ergonomic concept of angling the keys for your left hand in that way.  I'd like to give that layout a try and see if I prefer it to a standard keyboard layout.  But a lack of confidence in their company and if they'll ever deliver what they promise is holding me back.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Tue, 05 October 2010, 20:34:52
this pretty much looks like the ergo4k/browncherry/tenless i just built, (though this wasn't in my mind when i made it) if it actually comes out of vaporware, i might be interested cuz i sure as heck ain't never gonna mod another keyboard.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Tue, 05 October 2010, 20:58:17
But the problem for me is that yours and most other "ergonomic" boards make you angle your left fingers to the left when moving to strike keys above/below the home row.  These Truly Ergonomic guys big advantage in my view is that you can direct your left hand fingers straight in the same way as you do your right hand fingers.  As they say on their website, the standard layout is based on problems with making one of the old mechanical typewriters (along with the QWERY layout).  It's a very antiquated design in my opinion, so I'd be very interested in trying out their concept to see if I like it or not.

I've tried several of the other boards and none of them did anything for me.  I suppose a Kinesis might be good, but never tried one of them.

I much prefer IBM Model F keys though to Cherrys.  So if I like the concept enough, I might have to build my own ergonomic keyboard.  Not a trivial task at all, but might be a good project for me.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Tue, 05 October 2010, 22:41:16
Quote from: Sam;230222
But the problem for me is that yours and most other "ergonomic" boards make you angle your left fingers to the left when moving to strike keys above/below the home row.

Try doing the "ISO shuffle" / comfort layout:
(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=3701&d=1249982099)

I.e. use a European/ISO keyboard with the extra key between left shift and Z, then shift ZXCVB to the left via software. Any other moves are optional. The way the QWERTY row is only 1/4 key width to the left of the ASDF row means the change of the top row I've put in that picture doesn't work so well.

On a U.S./ANSI board you could just change the bottom row to be XCVBZ.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Phaedrus2129 on Tue, 05 October 2010, 22:53:51
I've asked for a review sample. We'll see what they say.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Tue, 05 October 2010, 23:17:46
Quote from: Rajagra;230260
Try doing the "ISO shuffle" / comfort layout:
Show Image
(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=3701&d=1249982099)


I.e. use a European/ISO keyboard with the extra key between left shift and Z, then shift ZXCVB to the left via software. Any other moves are optional. The way the QWERTY row is only 1/4 key width to the left of the ASDF row means the change of the top row I've put in that picture doesn't work so well.

On a U.S./ANSI board you could just change the bottom row to be XCVBZ.


Interesting, that's the first I've heard of that layout.  The first thing though that strikes me as being strange is that the number keys require changing which finger strikes which key.  I think that would take a lot of getting used to.

The one thing about the existing standard layout that bothers me is all the keys on the far right that you're expected to use your right pinky for.  There's simply too many there for my liking.  I think I'd prefer having another shifted layer to access the symbols and do away with so many keys there.  The layout you show reduces them in that location, but adds them in the middle and far right.  Hmmm, gotta think about this layout a bit more.

Thanks for the suggestion.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Tue, 05 October 2010, 23:41:39
hmmm never noticed left hand issues, if anything i have issues with my right hand, but that could be b/c i'm right handed, or it's also my mouse hand (moving to use mouse) so idk, but the readjusting of the home row looks cool, and pretty easy to do just like raj said, just shift everything over to the right. (for me i'd have to mod my keyboard and add another switch right next to the "t" in order to shift, but there's actually room to do that too)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Tue, 05 October 2010, 23:56:36
Just tried that layout.  Unfortunately it's horrible for me.  The primary reason is the spacing up/down from the home row is all wrong.  The left hand fingers have to angle much more from row-to-row than the right hand does.  As soon as I felt that issue, I realized I'd already tried something similar years ago and had that same problem.  For me, the angles your fingers are at should be exactly a mirror image between the left and right hands.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Wed, 06 October 2010, 00:16:06
I understand that each individual requires unique distinctions to get best typing ... I'm assuming that (given a choice) people would select whatever keyboard works best for their peculiar ergonomics.
 
But these details you're discussing seem too minute to be meaningful.  Wouldn't just laying the keyboard flat (ie, folding the standoffs) change everything?  Or - in the traditional spirit of un-ergonomics - just forcing the user to adapt to the keyboard's physical requirements?  (This is going to happen as long as there is any sort of "standard" keyboard arrangement.  Maybe one day everybody will be able to conjure up a perfectly optimized "natural" and efficient individual key-interface.)
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/16/STPeakPerform.jpg)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: rantenki on Wed, 06 October 2010, 00:21:20
Quote from: Rajagra;230260
Try doing the "ISO shuffle" / comfort layout:
Show Image
(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=3701&d=1249982099)


.... Well, now I feel retarded.
/me off to by a HHKB2^H^H^H^H^H cheap iso cherry
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Wed, 06 October 2010, 00:29:16
Quote from: Sam;230282
Interesting, that's the first I've heard of that layout.


That's just a rather extreme example I made for another discussion. The "comfort" layout idea / naming came here via Dreymar, I believe, and when applied to the QWERTY layout results in this:



The name "ISO shuffle" only just occurred to me, I think it sounds appropriate!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Wed, 06 October 2010, 00:30:15
It occurs to me that you people with the left-hand issues might in fact all be right-handed?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Wed, 06 October 2010, 00:30:43
Quote from: Konrad;230313

Show Image
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/16/STPeakPerform.jpg)


even Data lost on the first round.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Wed, 06 October 2010, 00:42:04
Quote from: Lanx;230323
even Data lost on the first round.


Nobody out-types webwit!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: CaptainKirk on Wed, 06 October 2010, 04:13:20
Quote from: Rajagra;151765
That's exactly what I thought when I first saw it. Those keys could be moved down a little to separate them from the main typing keys.

But the more I think about it, the more I suspect it wouldn't be a problem. You never hit space when you aim for C or V on a standard keyboard, do you? Maybe with practice, those keys would be in the ideal place - very easy to reach.  I really want to try one of these out.


You don't hit space when you type C, but the issue here is that your palm may bump into the down arrow when you type an 8 and the same issue with 2 key. In fact if you rest your palms on the table or the palm rest, I don't see how you could NOT have that problem.

I use a Kinesis Freestyle, for many moons now, and I still on occasion bump the left Ctrl key when I type a P. I am hoping to get an Advantage when I have some money. :)

Anyhow I think the arrows/page keys are for sure problematic--to get to the 2 your finger and hand must arch above PgDwn,PgUp,X,S,W. Seems like quite a stretch to me--and I have big hands. :)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Wed, 06 October 2010, 07:39:17
i agree, here's a pic i took of my normal hand resting position on my modified ergo 4k (since they seem to compare this keyboard to the ergo 4k a lot)
(http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/7592/p1010724i.jpg) (http://img844.imageshack.us/i/p1010724i.jpg/)




you'd be resting your lower pinky side on button basically, it's too long, I'm 5'10 and i think i have med hands (i can fit med glove sometimes i like large) but i don't think i could read that far, and this is in the negative slope position they are proposing.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Wed, 06 October 2010, 14:57:32
The design is very interesting. It's beyond me why keyboards are still asymmetrical. I'm in no hurry to get a new keyboard, so I'll patiently observe how this new keyboard will be received by the connoisseurs. If it's any good, I still may not get one because I don't dig black keyboards at all... white with blank keys would be godly.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Wed, 06 October 2010, 16:09:08
There's no way I'd be able to type on a non-standard crazy ergoboard with blank caps, lol.
 
I'm still struggling to convert my brain/fingers to colemak, I'm consistently ~60wpm now, not too bad but more to go.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: JBert on Thu, 07 October 2010, 14:05:44
Who's gone be a guinea pig?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Thu, 07 October 2010, 19:56:25
Not me, I avoid buying vapour.  And US$169 (plus $39 S/H) for a gimmick board, holy **** nope.  There are less expensive options for ergonomics and for cherries.
 
I nominate Ripster.  It's about time he paid Nigeria for his plaintain recipe.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Thu, 07 October 2010, 21:09:56
$40 for shipping? what the?... is it being shipped from the moon?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Thu, 07 October 2010, 21:31:35
From Nigeria? Y'know, past all those Somalian pirates?
 
For USD$208 - equivalent to about ₦31,500 (Nigerian Nairas) - I could buy a Deck Legend, or a Logitech G19, or all sorts of stuff from eBay or GH. Or just buy all the switches and an MCU and build my own in any (ergonomic/custom) form fact I like, lol.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: WhiteRice on Thu, 07 October 2010, 21:34:23
Quote from: Lanx;231114
$40 for shipping? what the?... is it being shipped from the moon?

lol good one
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Thu, 07 October 2010, 22:16:12
Quote from: Konrad;231124
From Nigeria? Y'know, past all those Somalian pirates?
 
For USD$208 - equivalent to about ₦31,500 (Nigerian Nairas) - I could buy a Deck Legend, or a Logitech G19, or all sorts of stuff from eBay or GH. Or just buy all the switches and an MCU and build my own in any (ergonomic/custom) form fact I like, lol.


For me, I'd simply like to try that layout first to see what I think of it.  I wouldn't be so concerned about the money aspect, as my time necessary to build something to test it out is much more valuable than I'd spend on the keyboard, even after paying for some excessive shipping charge.  BTW, I think the price goes up to $199 + shipping next week.

Anyways, think I'll wait for another guinea pig to buy it and comment, then if they don't like it and want to sell it cheap, I'll pick it up for some testing.  I just don't have enough faith in this not being some vaporware.

After reading comments on GH though over the past few months, I've come to the conclusion that there will never be a keyboard to please everyone.  Probably never even one to please the majority.  There's simply too many differences of opinion.  So ultimately, I've got to simply try out various formats, various keys, and decide for myself what works best, then make my own custom board suiting perfectly to me, even if nobody else likes it.  Trying though to decide what is the perfect format is the hard part as there's so many variables involved.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Thu, 07 October 2010, 22:46:58
Quote from: Sam
After reading comments on GH though over the past few months, I've come to the conclusion that there will never be a keyboard to please everyone. Probably never even one to please the majority.
Hole in one!
 
The keyboard/mouse are the interface between the Machine and the Human.  The Human - being an organic thing - is flawed, variable, irregular.  Each Human requires a unique interface and calibration to achieve optimum data throughput.
 
It's obvious, natural, and intuitive that an obvious, natural, and intuitive interface would serve best.  But most people just don't think about keyboards, some learn to type and they all just use what they're given.  GHers of course are keyboard nerds, so all the newest bestest (and retro-est) keyboard trends will appear here first, lol.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: iMav on Thu, 07 October 2010, 23:21:26
Quote from: Sam;231151
After reading comments on GH though over the past few months, I've come to the conclusion that there will never be a keyboard to please everyone..
If there was, there would be no need for geekhack.  Just a static link to where you could buy this holy grail of keyboards.  :)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Thu, 07 October 2010, 23:39:36
Quote from: iMav;231183
If there was, there would be no need for geekhack.  Just a static link to where you could buy this holy grail of keyboards.  :)


Very true!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Fri, 08 October 2010, 00:06:11
Quote from: Lanx;231114
$40 for shipping? what the?... is it being shipped from the moon?


That's international shipping. To the U.S. it's $19 USD, to Canada it's $19 CAD.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Fri, 08 October 2010, 00:23:42
Prices shown on their page (http://www.trulyergonomic.com/preorder.html) - $169 ($199 after 12Oct2010), "Shipping and Handling is $39.00 USD".
 
If you order, then PayPal does indeed charge $169+$39=$208.
 
lol, there's little substantial difference between US and CDN funds at this time, conversion rates hover around par. $208 USD = $211 CDN.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Fri, 08 October 2010, 00:28:29
The box on that page has tabs at the top to select location. Defaults to international. Not a great design, took me a while to see it.

[strike]Right now I'm trying to work out where the Windows keys are[/strike]. And Scroll Lock and Break. The model numbers (104/5 etc.) suggest they work as full MF keyboards so they should be there somewhere. They use a layer-shift key for multimedia functions etc, so there's no excuse for missing anything out.

ZOMG! (http://www.trulyergonomic.com/benefits.html#Programmability)

Quote
Programmability

For those who require special functionality, all keys are reprogrammable. This means that you have the option to simply plug-in the keyboard and use it with the language of your preference without the need to install any software, or have the option to change any required keys for the letters or symbols of your preference using simple software, including both spacebars where each spacebar can have its own functionality.

Additionally, the combination of the Super key  and the F1-F12 keys can send special functions like volume up or volume down, or can be set to launch specific applications of your preference. The software also allows choosing from available layouts and templates, then changing required functionality and saving them for later use.

Macros will be available by using a combination of software and hardware, and you will be able to change these as many times as required without the need to reboot the computer.


I think this just made my mind up. Now I just need to decide whether to get one of the exotic layouts with extra keys.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Fri, 08 October 2010, 08:50:12
Ummm, holy cow. If this programmable key thing is the real deal, I'll get it. But I'm concerned it's vapor-ware too... I mean you never know... plus it's a lot of money for something no one has tried.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: jpc on Fri, 08 October 2010, 09:07:29
Quote from: iMav;231183
If there was, there would be no need for geekhack.  Just a static link to where you could buy this holy grail of keyboards.  :)



This is close right? (http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/index.html)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: itlnstln on Fri, 08 October 2010, 09:11:29
I just checked out this thread after ignoring for awhile, and I must say that I am pretty excited about this.  I originally came to GH looking for an ergonomic mechanical 'board, and this one looks awesome.  It's pretty much everything I want in a keyboard.  Split layout, Cherry browns, compact, embedded numpad, and a built-in (but removable) wrist rest.  If this isn't vaporware, it'll be awesome.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Mon, 11 October 2010, 17:39:31
Well I've taken the plunge and pre-ordered the English International - Model 105 Option B. As tempted as I was by the 109 models with their extra keys, I like the 'purity' of the US/ISO equivalents with their neat stack of Alt/Ctrl/Shift keys. In any case the key between the space bars is a duplicate Del key, and I expect to reprogram that as my AutoHotkey modifier. (Although this layout is so good I may no longer need my AHK script!)

They have improved the layout since when I first checked them out. The shift keys are on the home row, just one key stretch away from the pinkie. Brilliant!

Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: zefrer on Mon, 11 October 2010, 18:01:32
Also want to see how it works on linux, but yeah I'd be interested if it actually ships.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Arc'xer on Mon, 11 October 2010, 19:21:52
Ran into a post on some site somebody wanting this keyboard but with topre switches. That'll actually be an interesting combination, albeit expensive(maybe not  μTron cost but still).

Though I never bothered with ergonomic keyboards, I've noticed I tend to kinda type spastically over the keyboard kinda moving around a lot not really staying in place per se; guess that's why I found the kinesis interesting since your forced yourself to stay separated.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: zefrer on Tue, 12 October 2010, 07:41:51
Quote from: Arc'xer;232686

Though I never bothered with ergonomic keyboards, I've noticed I tend to kinda type spastically over the keyboard kinda moving around a lot not really staying in place per se; guess that's why I found the kinesis interesting since your forced yourself to stay separated.


That's how I got into ergonomic keyboards - tried one for a week, comfort when typing was great, typing skill kept improving because of the hand separation. Been using ergonomic keyboards ever since. FYI you are still better off moving your hands, ie not resting your palms on the keyboard/wrist pad but hovering just above so your hands can move slightly over their own area, while not moving across to the other hands' area obviously.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Tue, 12 October 2010, 13:51:21
I wanted to order it too but I guess it's too late now for the discount. Although the page hasn't changed, it still says before the 12th... but it's the 12th today. What am I going to do!?!?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: rantenki on Tue, 12 October 2010, 15:54:05
Quote from: Keymonger;232972
I wanted to order it too but I guess it's too late now for the discount. Although the page hasn't changed, it still says before the 12th... but it's the 12th today. What am I going to do!?!?


Buy it FAST. I think they meant before/during.

Also, before the 12th, that page said before the 7th, then before the 30th (of sept). I think they are going to hold out until their production run is full.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Tue, 12 October 2010, 17:16:28
I'm always automatically skeptical about limited-time-offer sales pressure. The harder the advertiser/salesman tries to push a product in my face, the more suspicious I become.
 
"Buy it now because it'll go up in price soon!", "but for a limited time - today only - it's on sale at a special discount", "buy it now, before they're all gone!", etc.
 
If demand for the product is higher than supply, it's selling like crazy, and it's an unbelievably fantastic bargain at this price ... why don't they increase the supply or bump the price (profit) up a notch? It's not like manufacturers and vendors are all magnanimous or running a charity. And it's not like they'll say "ah, well we finally sold all 10,000 units, sorry people there's no more because we're moving on to another product".
 
I know advertisers are trying to hit you where you're psychologically weak, hype up your interest in the product ... but do they really have to make it so obvious? Does this **** actually work often enough on consumer sheep that they don't even have to think of new tactics?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Tue, 12 October 2010, 18:16:02
Quote from: Konrad;233016
I'm always automatically skeptical about limited-time-offer sales pressure. The harder the advertiser/salesman tries to push a product in my face, the more suspicious I become.
 
"Buy it now because it'll go up in price soon!", "but for a limited time - today only - it's on sale at a special discount", "buy it now, before they're all gone!", etc.
 
If demand for the product is higher than supply, it's selling like crazy, and it's an unbelievably fantastic bargain at this price ... why don't they increase the supply or bump the price (profit) up a notch? It's not like manufacturers and vendors are all magnanimous or running a charity. And it's not like they'll say "ah, well we finally sold all 10,000 units, sorry people there's no more because we're moving on to another product".
 
I know advertisers are trying to hit you where you're psychologically weak, hype up your interest in the product ... but do they really have to make it so obvious? Does this **** actually work often enough on consumer sheep that they don't even have to think of new tactics?

Well in this case I think it has something to do with the fact that you're dealing with a new company that's selling stuff, it's easier if you know upfront people wanna buy your stuff.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Wed, 13 October 2010, 02:07:49
You could be right, Keymonger.
 
But I'm still skeptical. Why else list the price per unit as $169.99 now and $199.99 in a couple weeks? That's obvious pressure tactics.
 
If they were really feeling out the market they'd do much better issuing limited-time rebates and coupons, same overall effect really (if less obvious), plus they'd also be able to track where their buyers/market is coming from a little more accurately.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Parak on Wed, 13 October 2010, 02:13:08
The reviews section makes me giggle.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Wed, 13 October 2010, 04:18:06
Now it says the 15th. I suspect it may never go up to the list price, but I wanted to make sure I got December delivery (which is also dependent on order date.) Of course demand may be low enough that that may not be an issue.

I hope they are successful with this. But if by any chance there's only one production run I want to be one of the people to get one. I was very tempted to order 2 or 3, but can't really afford to right now.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: zefrer on Wed, 13 October 2010, 08:58:29
Seeing as there's only two companies making mechanical ergonomic keyboards (currently making, that I know of), I too hope they ship, it is good and they keep producing.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: CaptainKirk on Wed, 13 October 2010, 09:01:33
Quote from: Konrad;233016

I know advertisers are trying to hit you where you're psychologically weak, hype up your interest in the product ... but do they really have to make it so obvious? Does this **** actually work often enough on consumer sheep that they don't even have to think of new tactics?


Ummm, yes. We are geeks, don't forget. The professional marketers, it seems, DO realize that the general public are sheep, not geeks.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Wed, 13 October 2010, 18:36:14
One thing to keep in mind is that tooling costs for designing a new keyboard can be very expensive.  Many people look at a cheap plastic case and the other components and don't realize just how expensive it can be per keyboard if you're only making a limited number.  If you're selling hundreds of thousands or millions of keyboards, the tooling costs are very small per unit.  For the type of quantities for a keyboard like this, a very large percent of the manufacturing cost per unit is in the initial tooling setup.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Wed, 13 October 2010, 19:45:05
Quote from: ripster;233512
That WebWit.  What a joker! (http://www.overclock.net/10998611-post8948.html)


He's just pissed that they used a photo of him without permission.

(http://www.trulyergonomic.com/images/Young_Children_CTS_RSI.jpg)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: rantenki on Wed, 13 October 2010, 22:40:42
Quote from: ripster;233512
That WebWit.  What a joker! (http://www.overclock.net/10998611-post8948.html)


Yeah, the obviously fabricated reviews were the straw that broke the camel's back for me, and the reason I decided not to order.

Well, that and the CNC machine in the basement (currently building a new keyboard housing).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Thu, 14 October 2010, 05:07:36
Quote from: ripster
Show Image
(http://www.trulyergonomic.com/images/TrulyErgonomic_com-Healthiest.jpg)
To be honest, I like the general form factor of all three sub-healthy keyboards (especially the top one).  I've tried and personally never liked split ergos before, so all the other keyboards in that pic would displease me.
 
I know a few people who swear by their ergos.  They type fast.  They're happy.  Just not for me.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Thu, 14 October 2010, 06:11:51
Quote from: rantenki;233615
Yeah, the obviously fabricated reviews were the straw that broke the camel's back for me, and the reason I decided not to order.

It says on the same page:
Quote
During such period, we have manufactured mockups and prototypes as well as fully working prototypes, and during such period as well have had real people test such prototypes making sure we are able to bring you a truly ergonomic keyboard. These individuals are the ones that provided the above reviews and testimonials towards our design.


But anyways. I just caved in and bought the blank Model 105B.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: hoggy on Thu, 14 October 2010, 15:03:53
I'm tempted, but I don't really want to run the risk in case it all folds...

Once they've proven themselves - that they ship and the reviews are good - I'm getting one - but not until then.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: CodeChef on Thu, 14 October 2010, 17:48:05
lmao, oh wow. Good for Sooty.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: muchadoaboutnothing on Thu, 14 October 2010, 18:31:33
Quote from: Keymonger;233667
It says on the same page:


It's not the fact that there ARE reviews, it's the wording. It's clearly the same guy making them all up. The writing style is quite frankly baffling. Capitalization is wrong, grammar is sometimes wrong, misspellings ("I am amaze with the simplicity of its unique design."). The writing style is consistently bad for every review.

Plus, science. All of the female named reviewers reviews judged together:
(http://imgur.com/jwpdA.png)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: WhiteRice on Thu, 14 October 2010, 19:01:36
Quote from: ripster;233942
Maybe it's the language barrier?  It's a Canadian company after all.
xD
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: rantenki on Thu, 14 October 2010, 21:39:30
Quote from: ripster;233942
Maybe it's the language barrier?  It's a Canadian company after all.

Totally valid actually; lots of _wealthy_ chinese immigrants around there. The WHOIS records show the headquarters being in a place that costs about 10,000 of those keyboards for the average house.

Sadly, I am not kidding!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Fri, 15 October 2010, 06:42:17
Oui, oui ... c'est un jeune clavier d'un ordinateur.
 
Bad language is a big danger sign when you're looking at an "anti-spyware" site that's trying to push a trojan spyware installer; the bigger hint is the lack of an online shopping cart, or a link that's always broken.  What kind of company wouldn't make damned sure they can actually get paid for their product?
 
There's plenty of sites from prominent Asian companies which just look utterly horrible and amateurish in English, often little more than a "contact us" page.  This site might just be one of that sort.  I wonder if they're aware of this geekhack thread.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: rantenki on Fri, 15 October 2010, 21:10:42
Quote from: Konrad;234129
There's plenty of sites from prominent Asian companies which just look utterly horrible and amateurish in English, often little more than a "contact us" page.  This site might just be one of that sort.  I wonder if they're aware of this geekhack thread.


I did mention it when I mailed them, but they responded with what looked like broilerplate.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaaTa on Fri, 15 October 2010, 21:58:15
I dunno, lots of the good ideas look like they came from the μTRON keyboard, but I dunno. At least the one's they're trying to sell you on at least: arrow keys, ergonomics, key alignment, closer to the mouse (actually I can put the trackball between the sides of the μTRON so it's already better :P).

Left:
(http://www.personal-media.co.jp/utronkb/images/leftlayout.png)

Right:
(http://www.personal-media.co.jp/utronkb/images/rightlayout.png)

On the plus side, it should be more available, about 1/4 the price (that's if you're in Japan), and comes in multiple switch types (no Topres, smaller keys, reduce key travel, or multiple thumbs switches though).

If it ends up being decent I'll order one myself. I'd preorder, but cash is tight atm.

I like my thumb backspace so I'll be looking for the 109A layout.

(http://www.trulyergonomic.com/images/Truly_Ergonomic_Keyboard_109A.png)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Sat, 16 October 2010, 03:02:33
Quote from: HaaTa;234511
I like my thumb backspace so I'll be looking for the 109A layout.


Don't forget it's programmable "including both spacebars where each spacebar can have its own functionality." I think that's how they can offer so many layouts. :thumb:
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Sat, 16 October 2010, 07:57:41
I wonder how it's programmable though. Do you use something like a tool to configure and then 'flash' the 'firmware'? I don't know of any keyboards that are fully programmable.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Sat, 16 October 2010, 08:31:04
I prefer devices that run off battery-powered NVRAM ... like PC mobos.  You can always press the reset button or pop the battery out for a few seconds/minutes to "wipe" your borky settings and start factory clean.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: calavera on Sat, 16 October 2010, 19:58:12
I wont pre-order but this is very interesting. Except the location of the four keys near the left hand palm..
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: keyb_gr on Sun, 17 October 2010, 13:27:22
Quote from: muchadoaboutnothing;233936
It's not the fact that there ARE reviews, it's the wording. It's clearly the same guy making them all up. The writing style is quite frankly baffling. Capitalization is wrong, grammar is sometimes wrong, misspellings ("I am amaze with the simplicity of its unique design."). The writing style is consistently bad for every review.

Plus, science. All of the female named reviewers reviews judged together:
Show Image
(http://imgur.com/jwpdA.png)

It's obvious that this was written by a guy when going by the first sentence alone. The marketing type, too. I don't need the Gender Genie for that, and I'm not even a native speaker.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: unicomp on Sun, 17 October 2010, 16:08:23
Isn't this board basically a flattened version of Kinesis Advantage? It seems to have similar arrow positions, thumb backspace, etc.

What makes this 'healthier' than any of the keyboards listed?

Why are they comparing the 'j to arrow' distance? OK, using the arrow keys is far away from the home position, however I usually find that the arrow keys are used together and so it is not particularly inconvenient to move the whole hand.

FAQ page with no question marks? (Edit: actually this is literal, I went to the FAQ page and used Ctrl+F '?' and got no results).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Sun, 17 October 2010, 17:10:42
I was going to say the Kinesis is a lot bigger, but the difference in width is only 16.5" vs 12.9". I'm surprised.

I think the advantage of the TEK is that they've removed a lot of the stupid and unhealthy aspects of conventional boards, while keeping it looking, well, still much like a conventional keyboard. If you took one of these into work and someone else had to use your PC they probably wouldn't mind. It's quite simple and logically laid out. The Kinesis would be more of an obstacle for them. Even if the hurdle is mainly psychological.

The TEK is a fair bit cheaper too.

I'm not sure how they can justify claiming it is more ergonomic than the Datahand, Kinesis and Maltron. That's a bit cheeky. But I do think it will be very good.

Oh, and is it flat? There isn't any info on that. Will we be able to swap keys between rows to match a new layout we've programmed in, for example?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: unicomp on Sun, 17 October 2010, 17:23:06
Fair enough. I'm not sure if it is flat or not, I was mainly just comparing it to the Kinesis. The price is better however I don't think it has swayed me yet.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sun, 17 October 2010, 19:07:38
Quote from: Rajagra;235259

I think the advantage of the TEK is that they've removed a lot of the stupid and unhealthy aspects of conventional boards, while keeping it looking, well, still much like a conventional keyboard.


what would you say qualifies as this?

as an example i played around with my modded board and i put a enter key in between my ergo split and it rarely gets used, in fact i'm trying to tell my brain to hit it right now but i still default to using the right pinky.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: zefrer on Mon, 18 October 2010, 00:08:48
Quote from: Lanx;235306
what would you say qualifies as this?

as an example i played around with my modded board and i put a enter key in between my ergo split and it rarely gets used, in fact i'm trying to tell my brain to hit it right now but i still default to using the right pinky.

Yes, but that's because you still have an enter key at your right pinky :)

I typed those two enters with my right thumb just now.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Parak on Mon, 18 October 2010, 00:29:25
All joking aside, I actually wish this was real, as I'd be all over it :(
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Forsaken on Mon, 18 October 2010, 06:04:47
It's a nice concept, and looks good, but to say it's more ergonomic than a datahand or kinesis advantage is just absurd.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Mon, 18 October 2010, 07:57:14
Quote from: Lanx;235306
what would you say qualifies as this?

The main problem is the conventional arrangement of keys and the fingers we are taught to use for each key:
(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=3698&d=1249980835)

This is a simple pattern that is easy to teach, but results in the left hand having to move and/or be positioned awkwardly and very differently to the right hand. Also note that the horizontal offset between rows is not even or symmetrical, so you can't simply remap keys. For example the following doesn't really work, because, e.g., moving the left middle finger from D to E requires 9/16" horizontal movement, compared to the right middle finger only going 3/16" horizontally. You simply cannot use a normal keyboard in a symmetrical way.

(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=3700&d=1249981754)

The TrulyErgonomic has done something that is mind-crushingly obvious. They've given each hand five columns of four keys with the columns aligned pointing at the elbow. Nearly all commonly used characters are in this area. (Only exceptions are / ? and - but they are put very close by.)

Bingo. The problem of ulnar deviation (http://www.kinesis-ergo.com/ulnar_deviation-c.htm) is solved. Achieves the same result as the Kinesis without having an oversized board. I would argue the TEK does this in a better way than the Kinesis. Having the forearms angled inwards is a more natural, relaxed position for me.

And I'm going to repeat this: having the shift keys right next to the little fingers is pure gold. For intensive typing of text this will reduce hand gymnastics to practically zero.

Possible finger map; not sure how best to hit key between B and N though:
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: muchadoaboutnothing on Mon, 18 October 2010, 08:09:02
Best of luck Rajagra. I await your review once you get it.

I'm not a believer yet myself. The layout sounds good in theory but execution/reality often changes things.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Mon, 18 October 2010, 08:46:02
My only concern is whether it happens. If it arrives, I'll be happy with it. It has Cherry switches (browns for me) in a sensible physical layout. Dual mode PS/2 and USB. NKRO and it's programmable if I want to change the layout for any reason. (Oh, yes, programmability also gives me a Colemak keyboard I can use at any machine.) What's not to love?
Fingers crossed they come through.

I may even remap my existing setup in advance to get used to that way of shifting. :smile:
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Mon, 18 October 2010, 13:42:25
Quote from: Rajagra;235442

The TrulyErgonomic has done something that is mind-crushingly obvious. They've given each hand five columns of four keys with the columns aligned pointing at the elbow. Nearly all commonly used characters are in this area. (Only exceptions are / ? and - but they are put very close by.)

Bingo. The problem of ulnar deviation (http://www.kinesis-ergo.com/ulnar_deviation-c.htm) is solved. Achieves the same result as the Kinesis without having an oversized board. I would argue the TEK does this in a better way than the Kinesis. Having the forearms angled inwards is a more natural, relaxed position for me.


I'm totally with you on this.  If the keyboard is all one unit, then the TrulyErgonomic approach seems the most logical way to do it.  Why nobody else has done this to know is really quite mind-boggling though.  It's simply common sense to me.

I don't know that the position of the shift key would make so much difference to me, though without trying it I don't know for sure.

Positioning of some of the other keys though seems a bit strange to me.  I think if I used it I'd need to do some remapping.  Most importantly, I'm right handed and only use my right thumb for the space bar.  My left thumb goes unused.  So that separate left space bar would definitely get a commonly used key on it instead of space.  Maybe backspace or enter.

I think the arrows would take a lot of getting used to for me.  I still like my good old numpad used with the numlock off for cursoring.  If I ever tried a board like this out, I'd probably buy a separate keypad to be used for my cursoring.  I know, it somewhat defeats the concept if I have to move my hands over to a cursor pad, but several decades of doing that isn't going to be an easy habit to break.  I think it'd be easier for me if I could program the board for a numpad on a layer inside the normal typing area, such as J,K,L and up/down a row.

I wish the company would do something to install a bit more confidence in their ability to deliver this so obviously simple improvement to the standard layout.  I would imagine if they're successful at all they'll be copied by other board makers.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Mon, 18 October 2010, 14:40:39
Quote from: Sam;235558
I would imagine if they're successful at all they'll be copied by other board makers.
I don't think so. It seems people are so terrified of anything that deviates from the old typewriter design, they are reluctant to use it. Only the 'nerds' are interested in a board like this, I'm afraid.

Two reasons for getting this thing are: 1. It doesn't follow the age-old typewriter design and 2. Mechanical switches. I think the design is great, but it could be slightly better (although, I'd have to try it myself to really be sure). What I would change is take that bottom Del key you see on the image above, and basically split it. I'd make the two space bars slighty smaller to accomodate the new key, because I don't think it's necessary to have big spacebar buttons. And certainly not giant space-wasting spacebars you see on every keyboard.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: elbowglue on Mon, 18 October 2010, 14:53:22
Raj, you just became this keyboards next "I tested it and I love it!" fake review ;)

Seriously though the layout does look cool.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Mon, 18 October 2010, 15:42:50
Quote from: ripster;235591
Nigerians are carving Raj's right now.


I said mahogany. MAHOGANY!

Sigh. No wonder their economy is shot.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: calavera on Mon, 18 October 2010, 21:12:01
I'm still debating whether I should pre-order this.. Also, judging by the pictures I think this keyboard is flat. You can tell by looking at a few pictures like the exposed brown switches picture. I would say for this to be a TRULY ergonomic keyboard it should be contoured like the Microsoft non-mechanical ones.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Tue, 19 October 2010, 10:25:08
this got me thinking for a future layout, maybe i'd mod another msergo 4k w/ cherry browns (or blues for something different) and use the truely ergonomic "straight line" layout, which to me is basically using a slightly staggered numpad layout. I've played my numpad around and testing it out, and it seems to work nice, i've even autohotkeyed my nostromo to kinda work that way too (it's almost straight lined), but i don't want to mod another keyboard!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Tue, 19 October 2010, 12:34:48
You've reminded me why I like keys in straight columns. That's how the Nostromo does it. And it just works. No learning curve. No fumbling in games. Just works. If/when the TrulyErgonomic arrives I may finally retire my N52te. It effectively does what my Nostergotype mockup did, and more (but lacking the split adjustability):

(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=8232&d=1268095198)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: unicomp on Tue, 19 October 2010, 13:31:26
Quote from: Rajagra;235998
Show Image
(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=8232&d=1268095198)


Nice.

Another note about this 'Truly Ergonomic Keyboard', surely if it was 'truly ergonomic' it would support more adjustment than it does currently? I would be put off by the fact that if the angle that the columns of keys are in is not to your suiting then you are effectively in a 'non-truly ergonomic' situation.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Tue, 19 October 2010, 13:31:59
but there's no such thing as a right handed nostromo =/
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: WhiteRice on Tue, 19 October 2010, 15:19:47
Quote from: Lanx;236025
but there's no such thing as a right handed nostromo =/
yet...
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Tue, 19 October 2010, 15:21:02
Quote from: unicomp;236024
Another note about this 'Truly Ergonomic Keyboard', surely if it was 'truly ergonomic' it would support more adjustment than it does currently? I would be put off by the fact that if the angle that the columns of keys are in is not to your suiting then you are effectively in a 'non-truly ergonomic' situation.


True, but let's be honest. The main reason you need to separate the two halves is to fix the problems caused by the traditional stagger. The TEK has fixed the stagger and separated the two hands a little more than normal keyboards. I think that will make it work for 90% of the population. Incidentally, 90% is the number of people that Datahand say their keyboard can be adjusted to.

A bigger concern for me is that it doesn't slope up towards the middle like the MS Ergonomic 4000. I think that would make it more comfortable. I wonder if that can be done with taller keycaps?
Quote from: Lanx;236025
but there's no such thing as a right handed nostromo =/

I know. It's tragic.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Tue, 19 October 2010, 15:51:52
oh it doesn't slope like the ms ergo? that's the only reason why i love the ms ergo so much, it has
1. the split
2. the slope
3. the negative incline
4. all working w/ nice wrist rest

i mean even the wrist rest is nicely molded.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: washuai on Tue, 19 October 2010, 16:54:50
In the pictures it makes it look like the middle finger column of keys sits vertically higher than the flanking keys.  Optical illusion or varied key cap height or slightly raised switches? (though the switches look from the removed keycap pictures to be the same height).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: JBert on Tue, 19 October 2010, 18:15:12
Quote from: unicomp;236024
Nice.

Another note about this 'Truly Ergonomic Keyboard', surely if it was 'truly ergonomic' it would support more adjustment than it does currently? I would be put off by the fact that if the angle that the columns of keys are in is not to your suiting then you are effectively in a 'non-truly ergonomic' situation.
Marketing research revealed that "Yet Another Ergonomic Keyboard" would not reach the desired target audience, so they thought they could get away with "truly".

Webwit is not amused.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Tue, 19 October 2010, 18:20:14
Optical illusion I think. The keys for the longer fingers are just set back further.



It would be nice to hope the mounting plate was in two flat halves, forming a peak at the middle, but the presence of keys in the centre makes that unlikely.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: unicomp on Tue, 19 October 2010, 18:21:23
Well it is clearly a marketing tool, however it leads to the natural question of how far one can take this notion. Can I make a keyboard named 'The Best Keyboard Ever Made'? Am I subject to some sort of guidelines as to the truthfulness of the name of my product or the apparent implication of the name?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Tue, 19 October 2010, 18:28:36
Ergonomic just means some thought was put into the design about how it matches people's needs. Even a standard keyboard can be called ergonomic. Those arrow keys didn't just throw themselves into an inverted T pattern.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: unicomp on Tue, 19 October 2010, 18:36:21
Well naturally one does note that the term 'ergonomically' is not well defined in any useful way.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: zefrer on Tue, 19 October 2010, 18:50:32
Quote from: unicomp;236147
Well naturally one does note that the term 'ergonomically' is not well defined in any useful way.


Sure it is. It is based in greek and stands for human engineering. Human engineering being "an applied science that coordinates the design of devices, systems, and physical working conditions with the capacities and requirements of the worker"

So yeah.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: unicomp on Tue, 19 October 2010, 18:53:23
Quote from: zefrer;236152
Sure it is. It is based in greek and stands for human engineering. Human engineering being "an applied science that coordinates the design of devices, systems, and physical working conditions with the capacities and requirements of the worker"

So yeah.

What I mean is that within the context of advertising there seems to be no explicit definition that must be fulfilled by a device such that one can attribute 'ergonomic' to it. One might phrase the objection more towards the rules governing advertising specifically, however it might be useful to have a more objective notion of what an 'ergonomic' device is.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Sat, 23 October 2010, 07:18:27
Looks like the pre-order price reduction has ended... it's listed for $200 now. I hope this means it's coming along nicely and that I'll get the board in December with no delays.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: hoggy on Sat, 23 October 2010, 08:46:09
Quote from: Keymonger;237598
Looks like the pre-order price reduction has ended... it's listed for $200 now. I hope this means it's coming along nicely and that I'll get the board in December with no delays.


Yeah, I'm sure it does :tongue:

To be fair, this is far and away too much effort for a scam compared to the norm.  Unless this is the scam version of mass production...
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Sat, 23 October 2010, 11:53:23
Quote from: Keymonger;237598
Looks like the pre-order price reduction has ended... it's listed for $200 now. I hope this means it's coming along nicely and that I'll get the board in December with no delays.

Awesome.

Quote from: hoggy;237612
To be fair, this is far and away too much effort for a scam compared to the norm.


Yes. I also think there was too much work involved for this to be a one-man operation. I think the claim of being a "corporation" is total spin, but as long as their product is as well developed as the ideas I don't care much.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Konrad on Sat, 23 October 2010, 14:13:14
I happen to own several corporations myself.  Uh, "we" enjoy compartmentalizing "our" assets to maximize efficiency and profits in "our" operation (get tax writeoffs and take advantage of corporate pricing, basically).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: CeeSA on Wed, 27 October 2010, 04:38:35
i wonder there is no adress for the company @ webside
only "City of Vancouver in British Columbia, Canada"
but no postal adress or telephonenumber

there is no possibility to pick up a keyboard in vancouver?

hmm, hmm. pre-order with feeling blue? no
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: rantenki on Wed, 27 October 2010, 10:53:17
Quote from: CeeSA;239279
i wonder there is no adress for the company @ webside
only "City of Vancouver in British Columbia, Canada"
but no postal adress or telephonenumber

there is no possibility to pick up a keyboard in vancouver?

hmm, hmm. pre-order with feeling blue? no


Code: [Select]

Registrant Name: Truly Ergonomic
Registrant Company: Truly Ergonomic Ltd.
Registrant Email Address: TrulyErgonomic@shaw.ca
Registrant Address: 9100 West 3rd Avenue
Registrant City: Vancouver
Registrant State/Region/Province: BC
Registrant Postal Code: V6J 1L3
Registrant Country: CA
Registrant Tel No: +1.6045556677
Registrant Fax No: +1.6045556677


Did they really just use a 555 phone #? Oh yes they did! The address is real enough though.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: muchadoaboutnothing on Wed, 27 October 2010, 11:35:52
Quote from: rantenki;239467
Did they really just use a 555 phone #? Oh yes they did! The address is real enough though.

Actually, only (XXX) 555-0100 to (XXX) 555-0200 are reserved in US and Canadian phone numbers for non-assignment.

It's technically possible that the number is real, but I kind of doubt it. You could try calling it.

If it's out of service, you can actually file a complaint to ICANN. This will force the domain registrant to update the domain with a valid contact phone number or lose ownership of it.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Wed, 27 October 2010, 12:04:23
Quote from: Keymonger;234632
I wonder how it's programmable though. Do you use something like a tool to configure and then 'flash' the 'firmware'? I don't know of any keyboards that are fully programmable.
Looks like the website has been updated:

Quote
(Programmable keys, etc etc...)

(...)

The software to do the above will be provided by us and will change the firmware of the keyboard. Hence, you can disconnect the keyboard and connect it to another computer preserving its functionality. If you are using a computer non-compatible with the software, you can use another compatible computer to reprogram your keyboard and then connect into your computer. The software also allows choosing from available layouts and templates, then changing required functionality and saving them for later use.

I like it. Sounds simple enough.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaaTa on Wed, 27 October 2010, 17:16:05
Haha, Discovery...

KEYBOARD CLAIMS TO REVOLUTIONIZE TYPING (http://news.discovery.com/tech/keyboard-claims-to-revolutionize-typing.html#mkcpgn=rssnws1)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Arc'xer on Wed, 27 October 2010, 17:59:43
Quote from: HaaTa;239633
Haha, Discovery...

KEYBOARD CLAIMS TO REVOLUTIONIZE TYPING (http://news.discovery.com/tech/keyboard-claims-to-revolutionize-typing.html#mkcpgn=rssnws1)

Such short-sighted comments. Is it that hard to find an external numpad.

Really I think that article does more harm than good seems like it just makes the TE look like some toy, what a ****ty article really.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Wed, 27 October 2010, 18:33:41
what kind of a journalist hunt's and peck's? that's like thumbing through the driving manual to see if you can make a legal right turn while your at an intersection or you carry a pocket sized websters with you if your a politician and go , wait lemme look this word up while your giving a speech.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: keyboardlover on Wed, 27 October 2010, 20:29:30
You'd be surprised how many journalists and writers hunt and peck, simply because they never learned to type properly.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Thu, 28 October 2010, 06:47:32
Quote from: HaaTa;239633
Haha, Discovery...

KEYBOARD CLAIMS TO REVOLUTIONIZE TYPING (http://news.discovery.com/tech/keyboard-claims-to-revolutionize-typing.html#mkcpgn=rssnws1)

Quote
Whew! One paragraph down, and I already need a break.

*facepalm*

:tsk:
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: woody on Thu, 28 October 2010, 07:04:31
Quote from: Rajagra;236144
Those arrow keys didn't just throw themselves into an inverted T pattern.

I still sniff about the good old days of the Model F cursor layout.
________
Mercedes-Benz 420 (http://www.mercedes-wiki.com/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_420)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sat, 30 October 2010, 23:39:37
I'm gonna mod my V2 ergo4k using this staggering, i'm torn between replicating the nostromo N52 staggering (pinky section is a little low) or staggering based on numpad area essentially or shfting the columns up+down a bit.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Sun, 07 November 2010, 11:09:00
Argh. It now says January 2011. I fear this thing ain't never gonna launch... why is it so hard to find a mechanical keyboard with a proper layout? This is stupid.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaaTa on Sun, 07 November 2010, 11:53:26
Dude, January is 2 months away...
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Sun, 07 November 2010, 12:01:44
Quote from: HaaTa;243835
Dude, January is 2 months away...

The point is that it said December 2010. Now it's January. When December rolls by, then what? February 2011. They'll just keep on delaying and then one day, BAM! Canceled.

They've been updating the site quite a bit, by the way. It has a lot of stuff now, lol.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sun, 07 November 2010, 15:00:35
Quote from: Keymonger;243836
The point is that it said December 2010. Now it's January. When December rolls by, then what? February 2011. They'll just keep on delaying and then one day, BAM! Canceled.

They've been updating the site quite a bit, by the way. It has a lot of stuff now, lol.


I hope if it is cancelled it's with refunds, can a company keep the monies off of pre-orders if the company folds or chapter 11? idk.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: muchadoaboutnothing on Sun, 07 November 2010, 15:24:40
Quote from: Lanx;243905
I hope if it is cancelled it's with refunds, can a company keep the monies off of pre-orders if the company folds or chapter 11? idk.

Depends on the type of company. A corporation is legally an individual and thus absorbs most legal obligations when it fails (the debtors get the assets of the corporations). However, in cases where it can be proven the management did not act in a fashion that can be reasonably justified (e.x. cooking the books, something insanely against market trends/your own staff recommendations/sane thought), there is some legal right. The downside is that you get taxed twice on everything- corporate taxes on everything, then you get taxed again.

In most other scenarios, any and all partners or the sole proprietor faces unlimited liability for any or all debts.

As far as recovery of money goes, a chargeback would work in many instances if you paid via credit card. When Sunrocket VoIP collapsed, most people with pending time were able to chargeback and get a full refund on their credit cards.

This is under US law, but the chargeback thing applies to anyone from the US charged. As far as the liability of companies, I can't speak for Canadian law.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: CorreCorre on Sun, 07 November 2010, 15:39:10
January 2011?  I read early 2011. Which could be any date in 2011 ('early' is a pretty vague indication, right?)

Quote

When are pre-orders expected to be deliver

Pre-order delivery is estimated for Early 2011, subject to change due to number of pre-orders which allow us to cost-effectively manufacture a precise quantity of each keyboard model reducing overall production and inventory costs and guaranteeing the manufacturing of required models.


Can anybody translate what he is trying to say? I graduated in economics, but I don't get it. Anyone?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sun, 07 November 2010, 15:56:03
Quote from: CorreCorre;243913
Can anybody translate what he is trying to say? I graduated in economics, but I don't get it. Anyone?


probably marketing speak for "we're actually waiting for more orders so we'll keep pushing it out and not give a definitive date. We're doing this because we need these orders as proof to our "backers" that we have enough interest and these "backers" will continue to inject us with capital. It is not necessarily the fact that we cannot produce these units at reasonable cost, we probably can but an objective we have to meet is to garner enough interest to make this a feasable item to market."
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: muchadoaboutnothing on Sun, 07 November 2010, 16:13:51
Quote from: CorreCorre;243913
Can anybody translate what he is trying to say? I graduated in economics, but I don't get it. Anyone?

Quote from: Truly Ergonomic Guy
Pre-order delivery is estimated for Early 2011, subject to change due to number of pre-orders which allow us to cost-effectively manufacture a precise quantity of each keyboard model reducing overall production and inventory costs and guaranteeing the manufacturing of required models.

Dissect it down to:

Quote from: Truly Ergonomic Guy
subject to change due to number of pre-orders which allow us to cost-effectively manufacture a precise quantity of each keyboard model

There are setup costs involved. Just like getting one set of doubleshots from Signature Plastics costs $800, there are non-negligible setup costs to get one keyboard made. If they can't get enough orders before Jan 2011 for there to be enough orders to make distribute the fixed costs enough (where no or a small quantity of profit is made per keyboard), they'll delay production of the model.

Quote from: Truly Ergonomic Guy
reducing overall production and inventory costs

By getting preorders you guarantee the sale of a keyboard for every preorder. If you don't, you risk stocking an unpopular/unsellable model, and even if you can sell it you have to have somewhere to store them.

Quote from: Truly Ergonomic Guy
guaranteeing the manufacturing of required models.

Make sure you get enough orders for each model that you can actually afford to have the MX Brown, MX Blue, etc. model made at a feasible cost; otherwise, if a switch proves unpopular, cancel it and refund the preorders.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Sun, 07 November 2010, 19:26:42
Quote from: Keymonger;243836
The point is that it said December 2010. Now it's January. When December rolls by, then what? February 2011. They'll just keep on delaying and then one day, BAM! Canceled.

They've been updating the site quite a bit, by the way. It has a lot of stuff now, lol.


I hate to break it to you, but if you read this thread, there's a link to an even earlier thread:
http://geekhack.org/showthread.php?t=8245#5 (http://geekhack.org/showthread.php?t=8245#5)
In reading that, it mentions their site at one point said delivery in Q2, 2010.  This delaying production seems to be their M.O. since day one.  I'd really like to see this keyboard be made because I'd like to test out this concept.  Unfortunately the company has done nothing to give me the slightest bit of confidence in their ability to make a product.  On the other hand, I do sympathize with anyone trying to make a startup work.  I know all about trying to manufacturer electronics as that is what I do professionally.  Designing something is less than half the battle.  Producing and marketing it is a lot more work and costs a lot more than your typical person realizes.  When the typical person has a great idea, they think only about that idea and designing it to the sample stage.  They give very little thought to all that's involved in getting it to market.  So my hope is that this is the case here and they had/have good intentions but simply underestimated the costs/difficulties in production and marketing, but will be able to overcome that given enough time.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Sun, 07 November 2010, 20:35:25
I'm aware of it having been delayed before, but some things seem to have changed. The design wasn't definitive back then, and now they have gotten coverage from some websites like Discovery... it might be delayed some more, but I'd like to think things have been moving forward.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: vorter on Sun, 07 November 2010, 20:38:35
I hate ergonomic boards. They seem harder to use than regular KBs.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Sun, 07 November 2010, 20:47:35
Quote from: vorter;244037
I hate ergonomic boards. They seem harder to use than regular KBs.


Maybe that's because nobody's made a well-designed ergonomic board yet, at least none that you've tried.  I'm in the same position as you.  All ergonomic boards I've tried have been horrible and worse than regular boards.  I doubt the Truly Ergonomic will be good enough for me to switch, but I do want one to test out their concept.  I've also never tried a DataHand, which I think might be to my liking, but they're no longer available new.  I'd also love to try the Kinesis and uTron, but I have serious doubts about both of them also (non-separable halves for the Kinesis, and small non-standard keycaps for the uTron).

I do really believe that a properly designed ergonomic board would be a big improvement over a standard keyboard if I can ever find one (or make my own), and if I spend the time to overcome the years of familiarity with the standard layout.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: vorter on Sun, 07 November 2010, 20:49:15
Quote from: Sam;244042
Maybe that's because nobody's made a well-designed ergonomic board yet, at least none that you've tried.  I'm in the same position as you.  All ergonomic boards I've tried have been horrible and worse than regular boards.  I doubt the Truly Ergonomic will be good enough for me to switch, but I do want one to test out their concept.  I've also never tried a DataHand, which I think might be to my liking, but they're no longer available new.  I'd also love to try the Kinesis and uTron, but I have serious doubts about both of them also (non-separable halves for the Kinesis, and small non-standard keycaps for the uTron).

I do really believe that a properly designed ergonomic board would be a big improvement over a standard keyboard if I can ever find one (or make my own), and if I spend the time to overcome the years of familiarity with the standard layout.


Yep, no design is better than the standard.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Sun, 07 November 2010, 21:28:18
Quote from: vorter;244044
Yep, no design is better than the standard.

The standard keyboard layout, is the same layout of old 19th century typewriters. For Pete's sake, it's not even symmetrical. Regular keyboards have a beyond terrible design. The space bar is especially awful; it makes the bottom row virtually obsolete by taking up all the space. I don't type with 10 fingers. I type with 9. I always hit the space bar with my left thumb, so my right thumb just... sits there. In the mean time, hitting backspace and enter requires me to move from the home row. Why can't I choose to use my right thumb for enter and backspace? The only reason why we're stuck with such designs is because people are used to it. That's it. People are terrified of new things, especially when it comes to computers. Fear of a slightly different key arrangement, fear of a different layout.

If you think keyboards are good as they are, good for you. I believe there should be options for all. But for folks like me, there are hardly any options. The DataHand looks interesting, but it's like, what, $1,300? Kinesis Advantage, $300? uTRON, $500? Those are the only three keyboards that I know of that are mechanical and don't follow the idiotic staggered typewriter layout. Regular keyboards meanwhile cost $15, or $80 or so with mechanical switches. It's incredible that despite the omnipresence of computers, it is so arduous to find a keyboard designed as a primary computer interface. I recognize the keyboard as the primary interface, and there are no excuses for current designs to be so flawed. And it is an outrage that if people want something different, they'll have to break the bank just to overcome the obvious flaws of regular keyboards.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sun, 07 November 2010, 21:32:13
Quote from: Keymonger;244065
And it is an outrage that if people want something different, they'll have to break the bank just to overcome the obvious flaws of regular keyboards.


Or make their own creation!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: msiegel on Sun, 07 November 2010, 21:41:08
Quote from: Lanx;244066
Or make their own creation!


+1!

i'm using model f parts to make mine :)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Sun, 07 November 2010, 21:48:52
Quote from: Sam;244002
their site at one point said delivery in Q2, 2010.

They weren't taking orders back then. Delays in availability aren't unusual even for the biggest companies. In fact it often seems to be the norm.

The latest change may not even affect orders already placed. I'm still hoping to get mine in December. They are no longer offering the discount for pre-ordering, so it doesn't look like they're desperate.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sun, 07 November 2010, 22:00:40
I think i'll be finishing up my new ergo4k V2 before anyone receives their TE board. Which is saying something since mainly one of the reasons why i want to make a new V2 board is cuz of the talk about the staggering in this thread too!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Sun, 07 November 2010, 22:11:00
Quote from: msiegel;244070
+1!

i'm using model f parts to make mine :)


+2.  But for me it'll be beam springs if possible, if and when I get around to it.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: CorreCorre on Mon, 08 November 2010, 01:42:54
Quote
Pre-order delivery is estimated for Early 2011, subject to change due to number of pre-orders which allow us to cost-effectively manufacture a precise quantity of each keyboard model reducing overall production and inventory costs and guaranteeing the manufacturing of required models


Thanks forumers for interpreting this paragraph. I now read it as follows:

"We have so many pre-orders that we can mass produce. This will be cheaper, but it will take longer".

What this probably means in reality is this:

"We have very few pre-orders. Probably the whole project will be cancelled, but I give it one last shot."


Anyway, does he really believe in it? Come on man, take a mortgage, ask your granddaddy and neighbours to invest, put your savings in it and PRODUCE !!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: zefrer on Mon, 08 November 2010, 07:49:57
The delivery estimate is dependant on when you order. Pre-orders before November 5th are supposedly due to be delivered by Xmas.

Oh and it is probably a good idea to get used to a new layout first before you decide it's no good/too hard. I mean, how long did it take you to get used to the standard layout? What makes you think switching to a new layout is going to be easy and how is that a fault of the layout itself? Does it being hard to learn have anything to do with how good it is?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Fri, 12 November 2010, 16:56:15
They're slowly adding updates to the website. Pic of keycaps:

(http://www.trulyergonomic.com/images/TrulyErgonomic_com-Keycaps.jpg)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: rantenki on Sat, 13 November 2010, 00:02:36
Quote from: Keymonger;246101
They're slowly adding updates to the website. Pic of keycaps:

Show Image
(http://www.trulyergonomic.com/images/TrulyErgonomic_com-Keycaps.jpg)


Looks like a higher profile DCS. Probably not signature then
(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=12060&d=1281344733)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sat, 13 November 2010, 15:41:01
i've been testing this column staggering and while it "feels" more comfortable it also is quite different to use.

For me i've come to realize that my left side is completely borked.

i use my index for "c" (when it should be middle)
and i use middle for "x" when it should be middle.

i'm kinda getting used to rewiring my muscle memory to use middle for "c" but using ring for "x" is kinda impossible. actually to me it's almost like that bar trick where if you put your middle finger underneath your hand you can't move your ring finger. (at least x is rarely used).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Sat, 13 November 2010, 15:45:20
Quote from: Lanx;246392
but using ring for "x" is kinda impossible. actually to me it's almost like that bar trick where if you put your middle finger underneath your hand you can't move your ring finger. (at least x is rarely used).


Pro tip: move your hand to accommodate your ring finger. :wink:
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sat, 13 November 2010, 15:48:34
move it how?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Sat, 13 November 2010, 17:05:22
Quote from: Lanx;246392
i've been testing this column staggering and while it "feels" more comfortable it also is quite different to use.


I'm not sure what you mean. If you are trying to replicate the Truly Ergonomic layout by relabelling a conventional one, you can't. The staggering on a normal keyboard is not symmetrical. E.g. from J to U is 3/16" inwards, but F to T is 9/16" inwards.

Normal keyboards make no sense. Not only is the stagger different for each hand, the path each finger has to travel is not even a straight line.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: JBert on Sat, 13 November 2010, 17:11:55
He did create a non-angled keyboard by modding a numpad section as can be seen in his MS Ergo 4K v2 mod thread (http://geekhack.org/showpost.php?p=244745&postcount=9).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sat, 13 November 2010, 17:12:31
Quote from: Rajagra;246424
I'm not sure what you mean. If you are trying to replicate the Truly Ergonomic layout by relabelling a conventional one, you can't. The staggering on a normal keyboard is not symmetrical. E.g. from J to U is 3/16" inwards, but F to T is 9/16" inwards.

Normal keyboards make no sense. Not only is the stagger different for each hand, the path each finger has to travel is not even a straight line.

like heck i can't!
http://geekhack.org/showwiki.php?title=Island:12439 (http://geekhack.org/showwiki.php?title=Island:12439)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Sat, 13 November 2010, 17:42:46
In that case it sounds like the bad habits learned from normal keyboards are causing problems.

It's ironic that the right hand side (which is less bad than the left side on a conventional board) doesn't have letters below the middle, ring, and little fingers, so you don't really reap the rewards of the "correctness".

Nevertheless, since learning to touch type, I find the ,./ keys easy to hit with the correct fingers, and I expect the same to be true of the ZXC keys on a correctly laid out board (like yours or the Truly Ergo) after some practice.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sat, 13 November 2010, 17:59:37
this might also be the issue for ppl who have switched over to the kinesis/maltron since they use the same type of column staggering as well. (at least i kept on thinking this when i was prototyping)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Sat, 13 November 2010, 18:26:38
When I use my Typematrix board, which has strictly vertical columns, I'm mostly OK. The notable exceptions are the 1 key and the B key. I think because they normally require a little hand movement not just finger movement.

Incidentally the Typematrix has big Shift keys spanning the home row, much like the Truly. The one on the left is a joy to use. The one on the right less so because there is a key (') that you have to hop over to reach the right Shift. The Truly doesn't have that problem.

(http://typematrix.com/style/img/tmx-2030_gallery-1.png)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sat, 13 November 2010, 20:01:59
hmmm vertical shift looks cool, i think i might incorporate that, still time to remod!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaaTa on Sat, 13 November 2010, 20:41:09
Quote from: Rajagra;246441
Nevertheless, since learning to touch type, I find the ,./ keys easy to hit with the correct fingers, and I expect the same to be true of the ZXC keys on a correctly laid out board (like yours or the Truly Ergo) after some practice.


Interesting, I also found myself using the correct fingers on the uTron as opposed to "standard" keyboards where I'd use alternate fingers due to the proximity of the keys.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Zalusithix on Sat, 13 November 2010, 22:13:25
Quote from: Lanx;246451
this might also be the issue for ppl who have switched over to the kinesis/maltron since they use the same type of column staggering as well. (at least i kept on thinking this when i was prototyping)

Neither the Kinesis nor the Maltron have column staggering. Well, the Kinesis does stagger the pinky column down a hair, but it's nothing like the variable staggering on the TE keyboard. Rather, they use angle and depth changes along the column to closer mimic the fingers' natural arcs.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sat, 13 November 2010, 22:29:32
kinesis looks like straight down (curved) columns.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Zalusithix on Sat, 13 November 2010, 22:39:24
Quote from: Lanx;246549
kinesis looks like straight down (curved) columns.

It does. Aside from a bit of a stagger down on the primary pinky column. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you, but when you said they have staggered columns, I pictured something like the TrulyErogomic keyboard (columns staggered up and down from each other).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sat, 13 November 2010, 22:43:31
Quote from: Zalusithix;246555
It does. Aside from a bit of a stagger down on the primary pinky column. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding you, but when you said they have staggered columns, I pictured something like the TrulyErogomic keyboard (columns staggered up and down from each other).


yea i keep forgetting the TE has that slight up and down column stagger, i really should just say columns. (i don't care for that slight up and down column stagger, doesn't seem to do anything except make an impossible mod lol)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Sat, 13 November 2010, 22:53:44
I think the terminology is getting a bit confusing.  The TE board is actually not staggered (left-to-right) like a normal keyboard is.  So rather than referring to the staggering, I think we should be referring to non-staggering.

(http://www.trulyergonomic.com/images/Symmetrical_Ergonomic_Keyboard_symmetric.jpg)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Zalusithix on Sat, 13 November 2010, 23:10:01
Quote from: Sam;246560
I think the terminology is getting a bit confusing.  The TE board is actually not staggered (left-to-right) like a normal keyboard is.  So rather than referring to the staggering, I think we should be referring to non-staggering.

Show Image
(http://www.trulyergonomic.com/images/Symmetrical_Ergonomic_Keyboard_symmetric.jpg)


That's not quite distinct enough though as staggering can refer to either row staggering or column staggering. The TE keyboard *is* staggered, but just not in the form that normal keyboards are. A truly non-staggered layout is effectively a matrix.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: hoggy on Sun, 14 November 2010, 00:20:31
Quote from: Lanx;246549
kinesis looks like straight down (curved) columns.


...and the maltron...
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sun, 14 November 2010, 01:35:02
hmmm lets call the TE vertical column stagger while the kinesis/maltron has a curved 5x4 matrix?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: cbf123 on Mon, 15 November 2010, 12:05:16
But the TE isn't actually staggered.  Each key is directly above the key below it.  It just looks staggered because the two grids of keys are at an angle relative to each other.

I think they missed an ergonomics opportunity though.  When I straighten out my fingers they sort of naturally spread out.  This makes me think that keys in the upper rows should be slightly wider than keys in the lower rows.  This would lead to a sort of fan-shaped spread of keys for each hand.  Probably too expensive to make nonstandard sizes of keys...
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Mon, 15 November 2010, 14:45:40
TE is staggered like middle finger area is highest then sorta pyramids down, at least that's what the render shows.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaaTa on Mon, 15 November 2010, 15:24:15
Hmm, what's the classification of this then:

(http://www.personal-media.co.jp/utronkb/images/key-m.jpg)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Mon, 15 November 2010, 15:25:30
i would classify that as centered staggered.
since the staggering, staggers towards the center of the keyboard.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: JBert on Mon, 15 November 2010, 15:43:40
I'd call it symmetric diagonal staggering.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Mon, 15 November 2010, 20:13:07
By the way I just noticed something. Why is it that Shift+Shift doesn't do a function similar to Caps Lock? A seperate Caps Lock seems unnecessary therefore... also, why is it that Caps Lock doesn't do anything on the number row, even though Shift does work as a modifier there?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaaTa on Mon, 15 November 2010, 20:39:36
Shift, at least in Linux is very different handling that say Caps Lock.

Shift is used to "shift" up to the next set of symbols, while Caps Lock is only used for inversing Alphabetic Symbols.

NumLock is very similar.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: woody on Tue, 16 November 2010, 04:14:12
Quote from: HaaTa;247302
Shift is used to "shift" up to the next set of symbols, while Caps Lock is only used for inversing Alphabetic Symbols.

This. And I have used keyboard where Lock changes numbers' row - you definitely don't want that.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaaTa on Tue, 16 November 2010, 07:09:38
Eww.
I guess they were using "Shift-Lock" rather than CapsLock.

For an interesting tidbit of info, a "-Latch" (e.g. Shift-Latch) is the usual term for "Sticky Keys". This is useful when you want to let go of the shift key and still want the next key you press shifted (but not the others afterwards).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Tue, 16 November 2010, 07:42:55
Quote from: HaaTa;247302
Shift, at least in Linux is very different handling that say Caps Lock.

Shift is used to "shift" up to the next set of symbols, while Caps Lock is only used for inversing Alphabetic Symbols.

Well, yeah. But what I'm saying is, why is Shift+Shift not a lock? You could have Shift Lock behave like a Caps Lock. I'm saying you could have Caps Lock enabled just by pressing both Shift keys at the same time. Shift+Shift doesn't do anything and that seems like a waste.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaaTa on Tue, 16 November 2010, 08:02:29
Well, that's not too hard to obtain. I'm sure Autohotkey could help you. Linux is a bit more interesting due to how things work internally, but still doable.

But the current keyboard locking stems from how CapsLock used to be released by pressing Shift, and not CapsLock again (typewriters and old keyboards, like my DisplayWriter).

Anyways, I pretty much agree with you. Though I end up mapping right shift to a different Shift as the only thing I ever use it for (on keyboards other than the uTron) is to do AltGr stuff.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Rajagra on Tue, 16 November 2010, 14:47:01
My first computer had Shift Lock, which not only operated as shift on all keys, it was also a toggle switch. There was nothing wrong with that system, it was just different.

Microsoft's StickyKeys is actually quite good. I have it set up so pressing Shift once affects only the following key. Pressing it twice locks it on for all following keys. Pressing Shift plus any key turns off the lock status, as does pressing Shift on its own.

The problems with it are (1) it makes Ctrl and Alt sticky as well, and (2) the level of feedback is inadequate - it's easy to lose track of what state it is in.

(1) and (2) combined add up to big problems, so I normally have the feature turned off.

EDIT> I just rediscovered another awful thing about Stickykeys. It makes the Windows key sticky as well. If you want to press it to get the start menu up, you have to press it three times. Of course you'll forget this and wonder if your PC has crashed when it doesn't respond properly.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Tue, 16 November 2010, 16:24:56
i've forced myself to use middle finger for "C" for the past few days and i get it 80% of the time (meaning i don't use my index finger) so i think learning "correctly" ain't so bad(i will mess up x,z i have no ring finger strength!)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: zefrer on Wed, 17 November 2010, 08:41:18
Lanx, you really need to try a Kinesis (of the contoured range). The key positions are absolutely spot on for using the correct finger for each key.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Wed, 17 November 2010, 08:59:27
won't i be basically making a non curved kinesis?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: zefrer on Wed, 17 November 2010, 09:43:02
Well sort of. That's why I said you should try the kinesis :)

In your layout for example the columns are straight but so are the rows . That's not the case on the kinesis (ignoring depth) and you have for example the Z key slightly lower than the X key that is next to it and the C key to the right of X is lower than X but not as low as Z. This is so the Z key is easiest to hit with your pinky which is the smallest of the 4 fingers excluding thumb. Every other key position is likewise adjusted depending on which finger is to be hitting it.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: krstf on Sat, 27 November 2010, 05:25:26
A propos Black Friday discount... http://www.trulyergonomic.com/index.html

I took the plunge (109 key international with browns), and have apparently made "an excellent investment in your personal health and comfort, and can look forward to increased typing efficiency."

Anxiously awaiting January 2011 ;)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaaTa on Sat, 27 November 2010, 09:33:06
Hmm, tempting, but I'm still gonna hold out, till it's actually released.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Johannes on Sat, 27 November 2010, 13:03:00
Quote from: site
But when you use a conventional keyboard day after day, you have a high risk of getting CTS or RSI as anyone can develop these conditions through repetitive typing and the use of conventional keyboards.

MAKE YOURSELF SAFE with a Truly Ergonomic Keyboard!

I think this is FUD. There is compelling evidence against RSI being real:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.rsi.deas.harvard.edu/handout.doc
http://tmswiki.wetpaint.com/page/Repetitive+Strain+Injuries+-+RSI
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Johannes on Sat, 27 November 2010, 13:23:46
Quote from: kishy;253039
Welcome to geekhack, and...

There is now compelling evidence that you don't know what you're talking about :)

I'm quite sure these things are not imaginary or fabricated.

How about you actually read Sarno's books? :) I think he knows what he's talking about, having successfully treated over ten thousand patients at the Rusk Institute by educating them on his beliefs of a psychological and emotional basis to their pain and symptoms.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sat, 27 November 2010, 14:39:30
Quote from: Johannes;253042
How about you actually read Sarno's books? :) I think he knows what he's talking about, having successfully treated over ten thousand patients at the Rusk Institute by educating them on his beliefs of a psychological and emotional basis to their pain and symptoms.


so give a tl:dr version
he's had ppl come in and say this is painful and hurts, i think i have rsi.

sort of like treating this as a phantom limb? where ppl think that they still have a arm(even tho it got amputated) and wake up hurting cuz of it?

or is he saying ergonomics is bs?

cuz that'd be like saying the NES controller was the best controller ever made with all it's rectangleness.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Johannes on Sat, 27 November 2010, 15:02:27
Quote from: Lanx;253068
or is he saying ergonomics is bs?

cuz that'd be like saying the NES controller was the best controller ever made with all it's rectangleness.

No. Ergonomics are good; they increase comfort and sometimes efficiency. He is saying that poor ergonomics won't make you develop an injury or chronic pain.

Quote from: kishy
Fair enough. I have, however, known more than enough people (am related to some, in fact) who have developed pain in joints that were used for the same repetitive motions as part of their jobs/careers, for years.

There may be psychological "RSI" diseases...but there are real ones too. It's impossible to disprove something that is true.
The books explain it all.
Quote from: Lanx
so give a tl:dr version
It's quite involved.
This is a short summary of his work, explaining the general idea: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.rsi.deas.harvard.edu/handout.doc
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sat, 27 November 2010, 16:56:52
whats considered poor ergonomics? if something that is ergonomic becomes poor ergonomic then i'd believe it is no longer ergonomic.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Johannes on Sat, 27 November 2010, 17:04:25
Quote
whats considered poor ergonomics?
It's subjective. The point is that you should not think of typing ergonomics as a matter of health, only comfort and efficiency.

Quote
if something that is ergonomic becomes poor ergonomic then i'd believe it is no longer ergonomic.
Yeah...
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: ricercar on Sat, 27 November 2010, 18:59:07
J, some of us have RSI, regardless of your data on theURL. You'll not make friends pontificating those same source materials repetitively in the face of contrary personal experience and competing historical evidence. With such a firm belief, you can wait a couple dozen posts and then argue with more foundation in the community.

Quote from: Lanx;253068
sort of like treating this as a phantom limb? where ppl think that they still have a arm(even tho it got amputated) and wake up hurting cuz of it?


I cut my hair and now have a phantom pony tail. not kidding.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: ricercar on Sat, 27 November 2010, 19:00:55
OOPS DOUBLE

Quote
if something that is ergonomic becomes poor ergonomic then i'd believe it is no longer ergonomic.

Is ergonomic like pregnant? You can't be poorly pregnant; you is or you aint.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sat, 27 November 2010, 19:53:24
Quote from: Johannes;253117
It's subjective. The point is that you should not think of typing ergonomics as a matter of health, only comfort and efficiency.

am i the only one getting confused here? ergonomics and comfort and efficiency go hand in hand or one can mean the other.

if i'm comfortable at my desk then i'm sure as hell healthy as well.

i think we need a better tl:dr cuz it sounds like you got a messed up version of someone elses tl:dr and your giving us an even worse version of an already tl:dr.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: hoggy on Sun, 28 November 2010, 04:28:57
I think you could have a sliding scale of ergonomics...

From very unergonomic - very likely to cause problems, awkward and not anatomically sensible movements required.

To very ergonomic - controls set naturally under the fingers (or feet) and comfortable sensible motions required to use them.

Disclaimer - I don't really know what I'm talking about - please feel free to disagree.

Some keyboards require a lot of force and the keys need to be hit dead centre...
Some keyboards don't require enough force so just resting your fingers on them can trigger a keypress.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Johannes on Sun, 28 November 2010, 05:39:40
hoggy: Yeah, ergonomics is a scale.

Quote from: Lanx;253158
am i the only one getting confused here? ergonomics and comfort and efficiency go hand in hand or one can mean the other.

if i'm comfortable at my desk then i'm sure as hell healthy as well.

i think we need a better tl:dr cuz it sounds like you got a messed up version of someone elses tl:dr and your giving us an even worse version of an already tl:dr.

Um, you are utterly misunderstanding my posts.
I'll rehash: What's considered an "unergonomic" keyboard or posture won't cause you injury or chronic pain. I am not offering any tl;dr version of dr. Sarno's works, only part of his conclusion, used against the FUD I quoted from the Truly Ergonomic site. If you want to understand the phenomenom, it can't be summarized in one line, you need to read what I linked to 2 posts back (or better, dr. Sarno's books)

I am not against the keyboard itself, only the scarce tactics they use to raise interest. The more such "typing causes injury" claims float around, the more people will develop wrist pain as a TMS symptom; fear is a major ingredient.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Sun, 28 November 2010, 08:27:39
Quote from: Johannes;253286

I am not against the keyboard itself, only the scarce tactics they use to raise interest. The more such "typing causes injury" claims float around, the more people will develop wrist pain as a TMS symptom; fear is a major ingredient.


oh you should have said that, a huge chunk of the GH population thinks that not only is the truelyergonomic bs with all of the 3d only renders, and the "reviews" of virtual products from suspect individuals to delay after delay of shipping dates, to the laughable marketing schemes and as you put it "scare tactics". (of we want the truelyergonomic to come to fruition too, many GH'ers have already pre-ordered one, don't want them to cancel and worse just steal ppl's money)

I personally believe ergonomics is something you wrap around your body, i make my entire desk environment conform to me.

besides my own version of the truelyergonomic is closer to becoming a reality than their 3D renders =p
(i will give truelyergonomic full credit on the 5x4 rectangle layout, that and raja, got me thinking).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: hoggy on Sun, 28 November 2010, 08:40:41
I'm going with Lanx on this one.  I'm hoping that those that have pre-ordered actually get the board the end - I'm not brave enough to take the plunge just yet - but if things work out I'll pay out for one.

I strongly object to the overmarketing they're pushing.  It's soo blatantly peppered with misinformation and well, plain lies.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: cbf123 on Mon, 29 November 2010, 12:13:08
Quote from: Johannes;253286
I'll rehash: What's considered an "unergonomic" keyboard or posture won't cause you injury or chronic pain. I am not offering any tl;dr version of dr. Sarno's works, only part of his conclusion, used against the FUD I quoted from the Truly Ergonomic site.


Having not read the books or the article I can only reply anecdotally.

I'm a professional software designer, and I've seen many co-workers get chronic pain (and some injuries) from poor ergonomics in the work environment.  Since many of them don't think about ergonomics enough to do anything about it, it's hard to believe that their issues are entirely psychosomatic.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Johannes on Mon, 29 November 2010, 12:27:25
Quote from: cbf123;253856
Having not read the books or the article I can only reply anecdotally.

I'm a professional software designer, and I've seen many co-workers get chronic pain (and some injuries) from poor ergonomics in the work environment.
Correction: You think their pain is caused by poor ergonomics. In TMS theory, in short, their pain is caused by their subconcious mind finding wrist pain a good hiding place from unacceptable emotions. dr. Sarno's books go into greater detail as to how the limbic and autonomous nervous systems could be capable of producing such a change. It's not "all in your head"; it's a physical change with a psychological origin. Wrist pain is a good hiding place probably because they type a lot, have heard scary stories about "RSI" and fear it. Plenty of people who have believed their pain was caused by poor ergonomics can, after being cured by dr. Sarno's works, once again type on any keyboard in any unergonomic posture they want without any pain.
Quote
Since many of them don't think about ergonomics enough to do anything about it, it's hard to believe that their issues are entirely psychosomatic.
So because they don't care about ergonomics much, that must be the cause of their pain?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: kill will on Mon, 29 November 2010, 12:39:16
Dr. Sarno's book made my penis grow 4 inches.

Ergonomics does exist.  Yes it may be sub conscious.  But a Gel wrist rest for your mouse WILL mess up your blood flow and cause future damage.  Short term it does feel good, but long term has bad effects.  Knowing things like these can save people a lot of pain.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Johannes on Mon, 29 November 2010, 12:44:05
Yeah, ergonomics exist and are good for comfort and efficiency, but are not mandatory for avoiding chronic pain like some people claim.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: cbf123 on Mon, 29 November 2010, 14:23:37
Quote from: Johannes;253875
Yeah, ergonomics exist and are good for comfort and efficiency, but are not mandatory for avoiding chronic pain like some people claim.

I can't believe you're saying that *all* ergonomics is imaginary.  You're seriously saying that if I do repetitive work in an unhealthy posture while stressing the wrong muscles in the wrong way for hours and hours a day that it's going to have no effect?  Really?

I could accept that *some* cases might be due to psychosomatic causes...but claiming that *all* of them are is just silly.

I also think that not everyone needs "ergo" keyboards and mice, but *some* people definitely do.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: cbf123 on Mon, 29 November 2010, 14:26:21
Quote from: Johannes;253864
In TMS theory, in short, their pain is caused by their subconcious mind finding wrist pain a good hiding place from unacceptable emotions. dr. Sarno's books go into greater detail as to how the limbic and autonomous nervous systems could be capable of producing such a change.


I can't believe you're saying that *all* ergonomics is imaginary. You're seriously saying that if I do repetitive work in an unhealthy posture while stressing the wrong muscles in the wrong way for hours and hours a day that it's going to have no effect? Really?

I could accept that *some* cases might be due to psychosomatic causes...but claiming that *all* of them are is just silly.

I also think that not everyone needs "ergo" keyboards and mice, but *some* people definitely do.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Johannes on Mon, 29 November 2010, 14:32:37
Quote
I can't believe you're saying that *all* ergonomics is imaginary. You're seriously saying that if I do repetitive work in an unhealthy posture while stressing the wrong muscles in the wrong way for hours and hours a day that it's going to have no effect? Really?
It's going to cause temporary discomfort/strain that will heal fairly quickly, not a pain syndrome.
Running or weight lifting for hours and hours - far more stressful and repetitive than typing can ever be - doesn't cause injury, so why should typing? And what does "wrong muscles" mean?

And for the 100th time, I'm not saying ergonomics are imaginary, I am saying that you don't strictly need to follow ergonomic guidelines to avoid pain syndromes.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaaTa on Mon, 29 November 2010, 15:16:52
Quote from: Johannes;253942
It's going to cause temporary discomfort/strain that will heal fairly quickly, not a pain syndrome.
Running or weight lifting for hours and hours - far more stressful and repetitive than typing can ever be - doesn't cause injury, so why should typing? And what does "wrong muscles" mean?


I'm jumping in :biggrin:.

Now, lets consider this, if your knee hurts after running for a few hours, and you run anyways. Is this bad?

Let's then consider typing. Many people, need to type, in order to work (e.g. Programmer, typist, etc.). Now if there hands start hurting a little bit, they will notice.
Unfortunately, the work still needs to get done (or they'll get fired...). So the usual reaction is to just keep working.
Repeat for a few years.
Eventually, the small pain becomes manageable, and not really noticeable.

Unfortunately the pain is there for a reason, your body does not like something that you are doing (pinching nerves, wearing out cartilage, etc.).

The RSI occurs, once all the "safety" in your body wears out, and even a small amount of movement will cause agony (grinding of bones, cutting off of nerves). Something like this takes years of proper recovery to heal (often impossible to bring back to 100%).


Now lets jump to ergonomic keyboards.

Yes, some keyboards that are "ergonomic" are a steaming pile of dog crap. But that doesn't mean all of the are.
The general purpose of an ergonomic keyboard is to lead your body into a good typing position, without having to think about it too much.
For example, split keyboards angling your hands (you don't necessarily need to do this on a generic keyboard).

Another example, switch weight (ricercar prefers MX Browns for this reason, if I remember correctly). This has to do with the force required to actuate, and making sure not to bottom out the switch (tactility and/or sound is a very good mental queue for this).
Sure you can train yourself (as I do), to not bottom out on heavy and light linear switches, but that takes a lot of effort (months/years, not really worth it, unless you like life hacks).


Myself, I change the way I type so that I can type comfortably on the keyboard I am using. This can be switching to a standing desk style, to angle of my elbows, to the chair I'm using, to raising my wrists.
Yes this is a completely viable solution, but it takes conscious effort (mental cycles), that not everyone is willing to (or can) give to fixing their comfort while typing.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: RoboKrikit on Mon, 29 November 2010, 15:33:07
I read a book on ergonomics that said RSI was real, and now I'm also an expert on ergonomics and psychology who condescends to people with real problems on forums.  I encourage others to read books too!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: JBert on Mon, 29 November 2010, 16:23:37
Books are dangerous. Think of the children!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: ricercar on Mon, 29 November 2010, 20:00:23
Quote from: JBert;253999
Books are dangerous. Think of the children!


Paper burns at Fahrenheit 451°
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaaTa on Mon, 29 November 2010, 20:29:27
*won't read unless in electronic format*
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: shrap on Tue, 30 November 2010, 00:48:06
Quote from: Johannes;253942

Running or weight lifting for hours and hours - far more stressful and repetitive than typing can ever be - doesn't cause injury, so why should typing? And what does "wrong muscles" mean?


Holy **** man, you need to stay in your lane. Runners are constantly injuring themselves, with shin splints, plantar fasciitis, bad knees, etc. Weight lifters suffer from strains, dropping weights on themselves, pulled muscles, etc. Many of these people will suffer from chronic injuries over their lifetimes. And only a very, very small fraction of people run 40 hours a week, 50 weeks out of the year.

You know why they don't suffer from RSI? Cause when it hurts, they stop running, lift lighter weights, ice up, go to sports medicine doctors, and generally deal with the problem.

If your job is typing, your ability to deal with the problem is limited, if you like having a roof over your head and food on the table.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Johannes on Tue, 30 November 2010, 10:36:51
Sorry, I was unclear. I meant pain syndromes. The long-standing pain people experience that they believe is from typing typically has no clear structural cause. CTS, for example:

"The rise of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome epidemic began in the 1980s with the emergence of the computer industry. Conventional medicine blames overusing keyboards as the cause of the various hand problems including wrist pain that accompany CTS. It has been found that the pain comes from a malfunction of the median nerve in the wrist. The conventional treatment is to inject steroids or cut the ligament. This treatment comes from the believe that the median nerve is being compressed as it meets the ligament at the wrist. However studies have shown that when the ligament is cut, the nerves regain functionality too quickly for compression to be the cause. The most likely causation is from a reduction of blood flow to the area, which supports the diagnosis of TMS." - The Divided Mind

Quote from: HaaTa
Unfortunately the pain is there for a reason, your body does not like something that you are doing (pinching nerves, wearing out cartilage, etc.).

The RSI occurs, once all the "safety" in your body wears out, and even a small amount of movement will cause agony (grinding of bones, cutting off of nerves). Something like this takes years of proper recovery to heal (often impossible to bring back to 100%).
TMS theory says otherwise:

On page 94-97 in The Mindbody Prescription, John Sarno writes
"Symptoms are attributed to repetitive tasks, like working at a computer keyboard. In many cases muscle, nerve and tendon involvement are combined with symptoms in the neck, shoulders, arms and hands, often bilateral. Patients complain of pain, numbness, tingling and weakness, invariably brought on or aggravated by their job tasks...Pain, numbness and tingling involve the hand and are attributed to compression of the median nerve by a band across the wrist, the flexor retinaculum...Without the knowledge of TMS it would be impossible to explain the symptoms."

On page 93 in To Be or Not To Be Pain Free, Marc Sopher writes
"I firmly believe that RSD (repetive stress disorders)...exists only because of the legal, social, and medical sanctions in our society. Remove litigation, insurance companies, and practitioners wed to the mistaken belief in physical causes for all physical symptoms, and RSDs vanish."

Quote from: HaaTa
Yes, some keyboards that are "ergonomic" are a steaming pile of dog crap. But that doesn't mean all of the are.
Never said that, I like good ergo boards :)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: cbf123 on Tue, 30 November 2010, 11:11:35
Quote from: ripster;254334
"Canadian High Tech" company (lol - what a oxymoron)

As a Canadian, I resent that.  These guys are based in BC, which produces expert technology for getting high...

(On a more serious note, the city of Ottawa had a 6 Mbps digital network running over the cable TV system back in 1982.  Network access was 8-10$/month.  Ah, progress...)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: itlnstln on Tue, 30 November 2010, 11:21:01
You must be new here, Canuck.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: ricercar on Tue, 30 November 2010, 18:31:49
Quote from: cbf123;254345
As a Canadian, I resent that.  These guys are based in BC, which produces expert technology for getting high...

(On a more serious note, the city of Ottawa had a 6 Mbps digital network running over the cable TV system back in 1982.  Network access was 8-10$/month.  Ah, progress...)

I call bull****. DARPA net wasn't piped into private homes in 1982 unless your name was Mandelbroot, Sagan, or Feynman. Is that a 1992 typo, or was the content something other than "internet"?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: theferenc on Tue, 30 November 2010, 20:20:27
If I remember correctly, Ottowa did have their own network, much as Hawaii did (Oloha-net). While Oloha-net was shortwave, IP based, Ottowa's was copper wire based. So it's not that far fetched, though unlikely to be available widely.

And in 1982, DARPA-net was at least that fast, but was mostly between institutions. Nothing precluded it from being piped to homes, though, except expense.

Admittedly, I haven't studied internet history in a while, but I am focused partially on networks for my PhD.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: cbf123 on Wed, 01 December 2010, 15:56:08
Quote from: ricercar;254618
I call bull****. DARPA net wasn't piped into private homes in 1982 unless your name was Mandelbroot, Sagan, or Feynman. Is that a 1992 typo, or was the content something other than "internet"?


I didn't actually say "internet" anywhere.  It was called the NABU Network (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NABU_Network).  Was originally intended to be full-speed bidirectional, but the cost to upgrade the cable plant was too high.  Only operated for a few years.

I did have uncapped 1.5Mbps ADSL in 1998 though.  Latencies were really good for gaming (better than I have now on a faster connection) since the number of people using it was so low.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: WhiteRice on Wed, 01 December 2010, 15:56:41
Is there any real proof that this keyboard exists yet?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Wed, 01 December 2010, 16:22:27
they only accept paypal, at least pay will refund i guess, better use creditcard to pay through paypal just in case.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Wed, 01 December 2010, 20:10:25
The latest from their website:
Quote
Pre-orders made before December 12th have a delivery estimated for Q1 2011.
Why am I not surprised?
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: sixty on Thu, 02 December 2010, 00:43:52
Quote
Some people recommend experimenting to determine which keyboard puts the least amount of stress on painful nerves and muscles. But who has the money and time to test all of the keyboards out there, and design a better simpler solution? You guessed right, we do

Yeah! So much money!

Quote
[...] depending on the number of pre-orders which will allow us to cost-effectively manufacture a precise quantity of each keyboard model. This reduces our overall production and inventory costs and guarantees the manufacturing of required models. [...]

I suppose they spent all their money on trying out every single keyboard on the market, thats why they now have to rely on your money to even get a single production batch out.

Seriously, **** this company and their pseudo-ergonomic keyboard, and especially all their hoax reviews of a keyboard that does not even exist. If I wanted to see fake reviews like that I would turn on some infomercials.

PS: Someone should teach them the meaning of the word "blog" - I don't think they quite get it (http://www.trulyergonomic.com/blog.html).

Disclaimer: Just arrived at the office after 1 hour journey stuck in snow. These jokers with their keyboard were a perfect target for my 8 am rage.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Johannes on Thu, 02 December 2010, 06:48:01
Wow, they claim their down-only non-adjustable board is better than the mighty DataHand. Theirs might be more value for the price, but cmon..
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Keymonger on Thu, 02 December 2010, 08:31:49
Quote from: Sam;255287
The latest from their website:

Why am I not surprised?


Quote
Pre-orders made after December 1st have a delivery date estimated for March 2011


Quote
When are pre-orders expected to be delivered?

Pre-orders made on or before November 30th, 2010 have a delivery date estimated for late January 2011.

Due to the number of pre-orders made on or before November 30th, 2010, pre-orders made on or after December 1st, 2010 have a delivery date estimated for March 2011. This is subject to change depending on the number of pre-orders which will allow us to cost-effectively manufacture a precise quantity of each keyboard model. This reduces our overall production and inventory costs and guarantees the manufacturing of required models.

Well thank goodness.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Laggy-gaga on Thu, 02 December 2010, 10:57:59
Quote from: Lanx;255152
they only accept paypal, at least pay will refund i guess, better use creditcard to pay through paypal just in case.


I assume paypal can only do a refund within 30days or 60 days?
Truly Ergenomic did a prom like 2 months ago for discount,
if any 1 put money at that time, then we hope them good luck.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: elbowglue on Thu, 02 December 2010, 11:01:27
This guy needs to take less time making fake reviews on his website and more time actually getting the keyboard made.  I think he has enough bull**** on the website to convince any apple lover that they need this keyboard.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Thu, 02 December 2010, 11:29:54
Quote from: Laggy-gaga;255650
I assume paypal can only do a refund within 30days or 60 days?
Truly Ergenomic did a prom like 2 months ago for discount,
if any 1 put money at that time, then we hope them good luck.


actually paypal refund is only like 20days i believe, that's why i said use paypal, but pay thru with a credit card so you get the credit protection that way, i guess.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Sam on Tue, 28 December 2010, 21:40:07
For Ray and any others who pre-ordered early, any word from them if they'll be shipping this month as originally promised?  Only a couple days left of this month. Still they're accepting pre-orders, and not regular orders.  Being it was supposed to be in production and shipping by now, I'd say it doesn't look too good.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: cbf123 on Tue, 28 December 2010, 22:59:08
The FAQ currently says that orders made before Nov 30th will be shipped late January.

I've pre-ordered and have actually gone back-and-forth with them via email a couple times (I wanted a 109-key board for flexibility, but with the center Del key from the US layout---I offered to pay for the extra Del key separately but they offered to just swap it for me.) .  If it really is a scam they're going to a lot of effort to make it look real--and given the number of people ordering via credit card and the fact that the authorities wouldn't have too much trouble tracking them down since they're based in Vancouver I think they might be legit.

My theory is that they're a tiny operation, on a shoestring budget, and they wanted to get a certain number of pre-orders before they ordered the boards to be manufactured.  That way they make sure they don't lose their shirts.

Yes, the claims on the website are hokey and the reviews are bogus.  They did take down the "green" claims after I sent them an email suggesting that it was a bit of a stretch.

I guess we'll see in February.  I'm curious how many people here have pre-orders.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: iMav on Tue, 28 December 2010, 23:04:58
Quote from: cbf123;270132
I'm curious how many people here have pre-orders.

And you haven't set up a poll yet to find out?  ;)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Lanx on Wed, 29 December 2010, 00:40:20
oh no i better start a movin on my mod!
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: sixty on Wed, 29 December 2010, 01:02:10
(http://i.imgur.com/H87Gn.jpg)

any minute now guys.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: ynih on Wed, 29 December 2010, 02:12:07
One, more unlikelier than the next... hehe
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: BartVB on Tue, 12 July 2011, 03:28:33
According to: http://www.trulyergonomic.com/blog.html the firmware of the keyboard can be reprogrammed:

Quote
DIP or double DIP; the technical side of the Truly Ergonomic Keyboard

This information is for those who want to find out more about the technical and electronic side of the Truly Ergonomic Keyboard.

The Truly Ergonomic Keyboard is reprogrammable. Additionally, it has DIP switches to simplify changing the most common settings without the need to install any software. They will allow, amongst others, for changing key functionality between those required for different Operating Systems or able to reprogram the spacebars differently; possible, with the simple flip of a switch.

The Truly Ergonomic Keyboard PCB is designed using the MEGAWIN MG84FL54BD MCU. You can find more information about this MCU at the manufacturer's website; within, you will find links to its Technical Datasheet, and a Development Kit.

One of the DIP switches of the Truly Ergonomic Keyboard will be set as the Device Firmware Upgrade/Update (DFU); equivalent to the DFU-button in the MG84FL54B Development Kit:
DIP switch ON = firmware protected, does not allow to reprogram the firmware.
DIP switch OFF = allows firmware to be reprogrammed.

We will also have the MCU Hardware Lock disabled - not locked, which means that the firmware code is unlocked in hardware. And although we are not able to make any source code public, as it is the Intellectual Property of the corporation manufacturing our line of products, the above-mentioned Development Kit includes source code created by the MCU manufacturer for computer keyboards.

If the above information sounds too technical, we reiterate you only need additional software if you require reprogramming the keyboard’s behaviour. We ensure you can simply plug-in your Truly Ergonomic Keyboard without requiring to install any additional software to fully use and enjoy your Truly Ergonomic Keyboard.

With a link to: http://www.megawin.com.tw/megawin_EN/ProductShow.asp?ID=175

The SDK for that microcontroller indeed includes example C code to create firmware for a keyboard. Nice. Not very userfriendly but a very hacker friendly solution :) But if you can make the keyboard send two different scancodes for the spacebars there is no need to reprogram the firmware just to remap some keys, there are a zillion userfriendly tools for that already.

But really cool that you can hack it this much. Now if only they would start sending out their products :)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: sordna on Wed, 13 July 2011, 15:21:29
Hmm, maybe it will help if TrulyErgonomic look into 3d printing :-)

[video=youtube;ZboxMsSz5Aw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZboxMsSz5Aw[/video] [video=youtube;1yt8ZZGFkFc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yt8ZZGFkFc[/video]
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: bse8128 on Sun, 17 July 2011, 18:06:25
The last months, after I read about RepRap and Makerbot, I've been thinking about building my own ergonomic keyboard. I'm pretty sure I could build a USB keyboard controller, but unfortunately my CAD skills are nonexistent. Maybe we could do an open-source project? With open source instructions, CAD models, USB controller firmware and so on, using shops like Shapeways, everyone could build their own with relative ease. Oh and hi btw, first post :)
EDIT: typo
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: alaricljs on Sun, 17 July 2011, 20:52:55
The first draft case bottom of an 87-key board came to $100 on shapeways in their WSF and could not be produced due to size in black or alumide (for the stiffness).  Came to $137 at ponoko.

While a sufficiently different design may prove to have a market at whatever price point you can reach, being too different limits your market.  That's a hard reality to work with.

So while I'm still moving forward with my particular design, I'm am trying to make it so that the PCB and controller is desirable enough that people would purchase a retail keyboard and gut it :)  Still cheaper than shapeways and you get to pick black/white.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: bse8128 on Mon, 18 July 2011, 12:08:01
I wasn't really thinking about having a market. I just thought it would be cool to have an open source blueprint for people to use, modify and build whatever kind of keyboard they want. But if printing cases is really that expensive, maybe I'm a few years early with that project.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: alaricljs on Mon, 18 July 2011, 12:51:50
Whether or not you are selling anything at all or just providing information, your need for a team specifies a market.  That market being people interested in the same thing you are interested and willing to not only put in the missing work needed but also willing to buy the end result.  Why do the work if you never get the product?

There already exist several firmwares for using AVR MCUs as KB controllers both as ps/2->USB interlopers that modify the data enroute and as new or replacement controllers for a PCB.  So you can either pick one and live with the features/limitations or modify it to suit your needs and of course there's always starting from scratch.

As for producing custom PCBs, it's taken me under a month to design a complete PCB for an 87 key board.  I started with zero knowledge of circuit design, but KBs are easy since it's just a controller and a bunch of switches and diodes.  It took me a few hours to design a case bottom in SketchUp that would physically accept the board with attachment points.  The best PCB quotes I've gotten are $120 delivered for 1 from one manuf, and $330 delivered for 25 from another.  Another reason to get other people interested in your stuff... group buys save you money too!

Now onto casings... I've already had some experience with SketchUp since I am also designing my own PC case so it was quick and easy to transfer measurements out of Kicad from the PCB to SketchUp for the case.  The really hard part is engineering a leg/tilt mechanism within the confines of available materials and space.  Once I found out it would cost more for a case bottom than it would for a complete retail KB of the same size I stopped.  You'll see that I'm not the only one since there's a 104key PCB project that fits a Filco case (see the Mods forum).
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: sordna on Wed, 20 July 2011, 10:30:36
They pushed out the delivery date on their website again, yawn:

We are pleased to announce that we have finalized the required tooling (the moulds) to be used to fabricate all parts of the Truly Ergonomic Keyboard and will be testing samples in a matter of days, making sure they all follow our design specifications. We will go ahead and manufacture the Truly Ergonomic Keyboard afterwards.

Pre-order delivery will follow as our primary goal is to bring our line of products to market as soon as possible. We are currently estimating delivery during August 2011.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: HaveANiceDay on Fri, 22 July 2011, 21:29:14
Quote from: alaricljs;382676
Once I found out it would cost more for a case bottom than it would for a complete retail KB of the same size I stopped.  You'll see that I'm not the only one since there's a 104key PCB project that fits a Filco case (see the Mods forum).
Story of my life :)
I will also be using just the case and the switches from my Filco tenkeyless for the Phantom mod and throw away the rest.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: alaricljs on Fri, 22 July 2011, 21:37:13
I have also used Prins' handy set of Kicad modules to setup a board.  I'm not about to steal your thunder but hope to offer my twist on things pretty soon.  Completely different goals, so everyone buy the Phantom so you can get some practice for buying mine!   (Now I have to come up with a cool name... damn you!  ;)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: bpiphany on Sat, 23 July 2011, 08:37:27
No, everyone buy my symmetric stagger board, I was first dammit =)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: alaricljs on Sat, 23 July 2011, 11:04:00
Well, not everyone wants a 104key board, Prins   :)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: bpiphany on Sat, 23 July 2011, 11:41:20
104? You can get at least 116 keys onto it if you like =P Actually almost no-one seems to want a full size board. I think I scared my few potential customers away too, or they are just very busy at the moment.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: sordna on Sat, 23 July 2011, 15:03:13
Quote from: PrinsValium;385916
104? You can get at least 116 keys onto it if you like =P Actually almost no-one seems to want a full size board. I think I scared my few potential customers away too, or they are just very busy at the moment.

You know, what would be really interesting is a split (2 freely movable halves) keyboard in symmetric stagger or matrix layout. Basically, a Kinesis, split in half, but instead of "bowls" for the keys, have a flat PCB on each side, in the same matrix layout.... and 2 or 4 extra keys added...
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Input Nirvana on Sun, 24 July 2011, 00:48:25
Quote from: sordna;385948
You know, what would be really interesting is a split (2 freely movable halves) keyboard in symmetric stagger or matrix layout. Basically, a Kinesis, split in half, but instead of "bowls" for the keys, have a flat PCB on each side, in the same matrix layout.... and 2 or 4 extra keys added...

[ATTACH=CONFIG]21973[/ATTACH]
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: sordna on Sun, 24 July 2011, 01:16:53
You took care of everything (and more) except for the flat PCB's :-) I sometimes think the Kinesis/Maltron bowl arrangement is a bit too extreme, and probably throws off a lot of people.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: Input Nirvana on Sun, 24 July 2011, 01:33:12
You're right, it does and I don't understand that. If you're looking for something that is more comfortable/ergonomic/human shaped, you know it won't be flat, square, and static.

When I SAW the Contoured and the Datahand I was 90% sure it was either the right thing or in the right direction.
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: noctua on Sun, 24 July 2011, 05:10:21
..the ergonomical forms has some disavantage.. it has me taken several weeks to become
as fast as on my flat keyboard.. and i'm still faster on my flat noctua-board.. ;)

i often had the feeling to type against the form especially with my index fingers,
..sometimes you can profit from shorter ways (index to pinky for example) but
true is also that these have larger gaps between the keys.. and this results
in longer ways.. and this sounds no good for me in both terms ergonomic
and speed.. the gold middle way may be the dream catcher ;)

it seems, that i have to add an third entry on my signature.. (hmmm...)
Title: Truly Ergenomic
Post by: luie on Wed, 03 August 2011, 02:25:47
looks nice.