I was wrong about the chip. It's a Sempron 2200+ at 1700Mhz... I was confusing it with an AMD system I built for my mom a while back that had an Athlon. She's now got an Athlon 64 for checking email and using google. Oh well.
Edit: Agreed, there would be no point in trying to find a chip that would be compatible with this motherboard, or hunting down an old motherboard to go with it. I *think* it's Socket A if memory serves.
Ideally I'd like a system with PCI, PCIe, AGP, SATA, IDE, Serial ports, PS/2, USB, *no onboard lan, video, or audio*, and enough room for **** tons of RAM, and height of the tower be damned.
The processor could be any maker as far as I'm concerned as long as it was quick, efficient, and would last me 5-8 years. Unfortunately I've never see a motherboard that is tailored to what the customer already has, they're always built fo what they want to sell you and "upgrade" you to. A good transitional mobo for me between my current WinXP32 system with IDE, PS/2, and DDR(1) and a new quad/octocore 64 bit 16GB RAM system with a 2 Ghz FSB would be something that would be able to run both the old AND the new hardware simultaneously so that I could upgrade components as I needed to, instead of having to replace everything at once (minus speakers, input devices, and monitor) just so it would work with the motherboard.
Maybe I'm not digging deep enough, but it seems like the mobo industry takes these advances in technology for granted and has no interest in backwards compatibility for those who wish to upgrade components as they NEED replacement, not because there's something newer and/or faster.
Grr, I'm a cranky dinosaur.