Am I the only person that questions why = is in the - position when there's an extra key on a numberpad? I always put - in it's standard place and use the extra - or a 'geek hack' key (two lines) as = below it, even if there's an = in the set, it just makes more sense that way. No good if your pad isn't programmable though.
I've said for a long, long,
long time that the top left corner key should be numpad equals, and Num Lock should NOT be in the base layer at all (heck, the IBM Model M SSK, released in
1986, moved it to Shift-Scroll Lock).
I understand (even though I don't agree with) the idea of making numpad zero and numpad plus 2U in size, but Num Lock in the base layer? NOPE.