Author Topic: Does anyone know the part number of the Lexmark Industrial M13? (Read 5965 times)

ch_123 · « **on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 09:51:41 »

I saw one somewhere and can't remember where for the life of me... Can anyone help?

And no, it's not the same as the part number of the Unicomp and Maxiswitch made ones.

microsoft windows · « **Reply #1 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 11:23:31 »

You oughta take a trip on over to Clickykeyboards.com and take a look in their archive. There's no doubt there's a Lexmark industrial someplace in there.

ch_123 · « **Reply #2 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 11:25:29 »

There aren't. Only Unicomp ones.

I think the Lexmark one was either on eBay or some random parts site. All sorts of Google magic didn't give me anything.

microsoft windows · « **Reply #3 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 11:32:23 »

Really? Without Webwit, I don't think there's anybody who knows.

ch_123 · « **Reply #4 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 12:21:28 »

Webwit only has Unicomp and Maxiswitch ones.

Mental Hobbit · « **Reply #5 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 12:32:27 »

Isn't the "Made in USA" one a Lexmark? Webwit's photo borrowed from this thread.

Edit: Nope.

ch_123 · « **Reply #6 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 12:37:25 »

You mean the one that says "Mfg by Unicomp"?

I think there's some sort of crucial communication barrier between us all....

Mental Hobbit · « **Reply #7 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 12:42:37 »

No, I meant one of the top three, overlooked they're ordinary Industrials, not M13s. My fault.

microsoft windows · « **Reply #8 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 13:57:40 »

I found one online.

ch_123 · « **Reply #9 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 14:46:03 »

Again, the communications barrier is really overwhelming. Is it my Irish accent perhaps?

microsoft windows · « **Reply #10 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 16:42:14 »

I don't think Lexmark ever made industrial M13's. That was a Unicomp thing.

ch_123 · « **Reply #11 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 16:51:03 »

From top of thread -

Quote

I saw one somewhere and can't remember where for the life of me... Can anyone help?

If you can't read English, stop spamming every thread to get postcount++

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #12 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 18:05:20 »

Quote from: ch_123;204158

Again, the communications barrier is really overwhelming. Is it my Irish accent perhaps?

Oqsy · « **Reply #13 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 20:19:13 »

Unicomp made them didn't they?

Oqsy · « **Reply #14 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 21:11:10 »

Which one is he looking for? Maxiswitch or Unicomp?

Oqsy · « **Reply #15 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 21:28:00 »

Did Lexmark make one?

Oqsy · « **Reply #16 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 21:44:12 »

Ok, you caught me

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #17 on:** Mon, 19 July 2010, 23:45:01 »

Quote from: Oqsy;204365

Ok, you caught me
Show Image

Oqsy is spending too much time in the troll den:

Oqsy · « **Reply #18 on:** Tue, 20 July 2010, 00:00:47 »

Gotta love a sweet, well-intentioned troll...
It's those kind that always start OS wars and CPU wars that you gotta watch out for!

Ahem...

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #19 on:** Tue, 20 July 2010, 00:43:33 »

Quote from: Oqsy;204406

Gotta love a sweet, well-intentioned troll...
It's those kind that always start OS wars and CPU wars that you gotta watch out for!

Ahem...

Ahhh yes! Those trolls... always saying AMD is better than intel. I found the athlon processors okay, they were one of the best back in the day if I'm not mistaken.

Quote from: Oqsy;204365

Ok, you caught me
Show Image

Sorry for bringing that troll pic up again, but is it just me, or is there a resemblance to steve ballmer?

sandy55 · « **Reply #20 on:** Tue, 20 July 2010, 09:32:29 »

See this page.
Gray casing M13 is listed in the middle of the list with a comment "STILL SEARCHING FOR THIS GRAY ONE".
Not sure if the author has ever seen Lexmark M13 of industrial color, if the picture is actual one of said model. He says PN is 97G7461 which is same as white color M13 both made by Lexmark and Maxi Switch. Seems like the author ( a Japanese, maybe ) is an expert of M. There maybe such a model with that PN.

ch_123 · « **Reply #21 on:** Tue, 20 July 2010, 13:35:30 »

That's where I saw it.

THANK YOU SANDY.

But yeah, you could be right. It could well be a big confusion over what they think they are looking for.

JBert · « **Reply #22 on:** Tue, 20 July 2010, 16:40:02 »

Quote from: ch_123;204120

I think there's some sort of crucial communication barrier between us all....

There's no barrier. Just thick-skulled people.

microsoft windows · « **Reply #23 on:** Tue, 20 July 2010, 17:10:59 »

Quote from: ch_123;204565

That's where I saw it.

THANK YOU SANDY.

But yeah, you could be right. It could well be a big confusion over what they think they are looking for.

I don't think it's really a Lexmark. Once I see a label I'll believe it.

ch_123 · « **Reply #24 on:** Tue, 20 July 2010, 17:49:06 »

Quote from: JBert;204640

There's no barrier. Just thick-skulled people.

I was trying to be polite

ch_123 · « **Reply #25 on:** Tue, 20 July 2010, 18:17:07 »

Quote from: sandy55;204506

See this page.
Gray casing M13 is listed in the middle of the list with a comment "STILL SEARCHING FOR THIS GRAY ONE".
Not sure if the author has ever seen Lexmark M13 of industrial color, if the picture is actual one of said model. He says PN is 97G7461 which is same as white color M13 both made by Lexmark and Maxi Switch. Seems like the author ( a Japanese, maybe ) is an expert of M. There maybe such a model with that PN.

Sandy, do you have a source on those white M13s that have that part number? Googling the part number shows up -

1) That guys page
2) This thread

There was a part number beginning with 92G as opposed to 97G that appears to have been associated with white Maxiswitch M13s.

There's a pretty extensive, albeit not complete list of part numbers here. It mentions a good few white M13 variants, but none with that part number.

microsoft windows · « **Reply #26 on:** Tue, 20 July 2010, 20:37:03 »

Hmm. I guess it's just a mystery.

sandy55 · « **Reply #27 on:** Wed, 21 July 2010, 04:54:48 »

Quote from: ch_123;204676

Sandy, do you have a source on those white M13s that have that part number? Googling the part number shows up -

1) That guys page
2) This thread

There was a part number beginning with 92G as opposed to 97G that appears to have been associated with white Maxiswitch M13s.

Ooopes! Sorry. I mixed up with 92G and 97G just because following 4 digits are same with each other. Beige M13s made by Lexmark and Maxi Switch are known as 92G7461. I don't have any source for 97Gxxxx M13 except that page.

sorry again.

ch_123 · « **Reply #28 on:** Wed, 21 July 2010, 05:08:43 »

So, it's probably safe to assume that that is the right part number.

Voixdelion · « **Reply #29 on:** Wed, 21 July 2010, 06:18:22 »

Quote from: ch_123;204676

Sandy, do you have a source on those white M13s that have that part number? Googling the part number shows up -

1) That guys page
2) This thread

LOL! Don't ya just hate that? When I am trying to find info on something and Google turns up my own inquiries in the top 10 results I start double checking my search parameters to make sure I haven't inadvertently filtered all but the most useless information. I dunno but I think the Google engine just feels less efficient than it used to be or somehow less far-reaching?

But I suppose you never know, that could be advantageous... The same thing happened to me with my "want it now" ebay post when I was looking to find an M5-1, and I actually managed to get a response to that ad within about 36 hours of posting it, apparently because it was the first result on the list when someone else Googled M5-1 looking to sell...

ch_123 · « **Reply #30 on:** Wed, 21 July 2010, 08:01:50 »

Well, in this instance, the reason why I only got those queries was because that one page was the only indexed page that showed that part number of IBM, and this thread was the only other thing that referenced it.

If my hazy memories on lectures about search engine design are correct, the retrieval of every relevant page on the net for a certain query is impossible, so search engine development focuses around filtering out garbage as opposed to trying to retrieve more relevant stuff.

Voixdelion · « **Reply #31 on:** Wed, 21 July 2010, 09:15:21 »

Quote from: ch_123;204810

If my hazy memories on lectures about search engine design are correct, the retrieval of every relevant page on the net for a certain query is impossible, so search engine development focuses around filtering out garbage as opposed to trying to retrieve more relevant stuff.

I would think, in these enlightened times, that the filtering of garbage would be a far more arduous task than finding relevance... :wink:

microsoft windows · « **Reply #32 on:** Thu, 22 July 2010, 11:15:16 »

One thing I wish Google would do would be to filter out all that automated crap like "Download the [insert your search term here] driver today from ilovetodownloadlotsofdrivers.com!". It wouldn't be all that hard to filter it all out. It would make searching for old drivers MUCH easier.

gr1m · « **Reply #33 on:** Thu, 22 July 2010, 12:08:49 »

Or filter searches in other pages. Like, when I search "download Blue Shift free", I get a result that's the same "download Blue Shift free" search done on another page (like a warez site) that gives no results.

Voixdelion · « **Reply #34 on:** Thu, 22 July 2010, 19:56:16 »

Quote from: gr1m;205285

Or filter searches in other pages. Like, when I search "download Blue Shift free", I get a result that's the same "download Blue Shift free" search done on another page (like a warez site) that gives no results.

+1 Amen to that.
Especially when you might be looking for something unusual with common terminology that turns up zero results when you put it in quotes. I hate slogging through tons of stuff that can't be avoided and then getting all excited about a result that appears to be "exactly what I was looking for" only to find a page that can search for "exactly what I was looking for".

Or how about when you are searching for model numbers with the letters MB or KB or GB and getting results from pages listing anything with a file size that matches the numbers?

EDIT> Hey look! I think this time I'm the one that derailed the thread off the original topic! Cool! Now I feel like an OFFICIAL Geekhacker!

News:

Author Topic: Does anyone know the part number of the Lexmark Industrial M13? (Read 5965 times)