With this being said, could you please limit yourself to one IC at a time, see that through to completion, and then pick up the others, one at a time? Ideas are great, but it doesn't really accomplish much to create so many ICs at the same time.
I honestly don't see why. If ideas exist, they should be put out and checked for interest. Which is the whole purpose. If one idea isn't getting as much interest as you might like, maybe another might. Should the other one be closed at that time? It might garner more interest in the meantime.
You're right, what I said really only applies to GBs, not ICs. I was imagining all of the ICs coming to GB phase at the same time, and that could get messy.
Whoa, okay. First, moose was right, and I was overreacting. We've had some members get really excited about running GBs and take on more than they can handle, so I was perhaps being a bit too sensitive to that. That's my fault. Running multiple ICs at the same time is fine.
I'm not really sure why you quoted something about threadcrapping, but okay.
Also, my comment came off as really mod-like, but it was really meant as a comment from a user. When I see a ton of ICs pop up from one person I start to question how committed they are and how likely they will all be to succeed, so I was suggesting that it might be easier (both to manage on his side and to follow on our side) to do them one at a time. Just so we're clear on that.