Author Topic: Hanes Boxer Briefs 5 pack - 1/2 off at Amazon  (Read 5408 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Michael

  • Formerly Bro Caps
  • * Maker
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4634
  • REEEeeeeEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeee

Offline eth0s

  • Posts: 1137
  • Location: New York City
  • Peace & Love
I ♥ Click Clack.  I ♥♥♥ Bro Caps.

Offline kmiller8

  • Banned
  •  Post Reporting Timeout
  • Posts: 1589
  • Who is that kmiller8 guy?
Re: Hanes Boxer Briefs 5 pack - 1/2 off at Amazon
« Reply #2 on: Sat, 12 April 2014, 21:57:50 »
Which one of you two will model these for the rest of us?

Offline Belfong

  • Formerly known as Ballfong
  • Posts: 5205
  • Location: Malaysia
Re: Hanes Boxer Briefs 5 pack - 1/2 off at Amazon
« Reply #3 on: Sat, 12 April 2014, 22:15:01 »
Eagerly awaiting Zombro models wearing Boxers.
 

Offline Thechemist

  • Posts: 244
  • Location: East Coast USA
Re: Hanes Boxer Briefs 5 pack - 1/2 off at Amazon
« Reply #4 on: Sat, 12 April 2014, 22:21:15 »
Sexy Santa suit all over again.


Offline sovano

  • Posts: 61
  • Location: Madison, WI
Re: Hanes Boxer Briefs 5 pack - 1/2 off at Amazon
« Reply #5 on: Sat, 12 April 2014, 22:24:11 »
Strangely enough...I needed to buy some more boxers. What a weird coincidence.

Offline Michael

  • Formerly Bro Caps
  • * Maker
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4634
  • REEEeeeeEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeee
Re: Hanes Boxer Briefs 5 pack - 1/2 off at Amazon
« Reply #6 on: Sat, 12 April 2014, 22:29:54 »


zomg those kill sperm.  Too hot for the jimmies.



No they don't. They don't hug the jimmies like briefs do.

Offline ferociousfingerings

  • Posts: 173
  • Location: red stick
Re: Hanes Boxer Briefs 5 pack - 1/2 off at Amazon
« Reply #7 on: Sun, 13 April 2014, 01:06:07 »


zomg those kill sperm.  Too hot for the jimmies.



No they don't. They don't hug the jimmies like briefs do.

Whether they "kill sperm," they (boxer briefs) do indeed exhibit a bit of anti-gravity "scrunch," aka "ride up."

Someone needs to drape a man-skirt over a briefs skeleton/framework, and call it a day; that way, you get the security/stability of briefs, with the freedom of a boxer!

Or you could just go commando, if you're not doing anything too... uh... high impact.
Logitech G710+

Offline fohat.digs

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 6124
  • Location: 3555'N, 8353'W
  • weird funny old guy
Re: Hanes Boxer Briefs 5 pack - 1/2 off at Amazon
« Reply #8 on: Thu, 21 January 2021, 08:23:28 »
Those seem to me to be the most pointless garments ever.

I wear boxers (non-stretchable cotton, please, loose) most of the time for comfort. Only when I need support do I wear briefs, and when you need it you need it.

"Boxer Briefs" sounds like the worst of both worlds - uncomfortable stretch fabric and no support.
Over the past few decades there has been a redistribution of dignity upward. The Republicans valorized entrepreneurs, CEOs and Wall Street. The Democratic Party became dominated by people in the creative class, who attended competitive colleges, moved to affluent metro areas, married each other and ladled advantages onto their kids so they could leap even farther ahead. There was a bipartisan embrace of a culture of individualism, which opens up a lot of space for people with resources and social support but means loneliness and abandonment for people without. Four years of college became the definition of the good life, which left roughly two-thirds of the country out. And so came the crisis that Biden was elected to address the poisonous combination of elite insularity and vicious populist resentment. A group of people so enraged by a lack of respect that they are willing to risk death by Covid if they get to stick a middle finger in the air against those who they think look down on them. They are willing to torch our institutions because they are so resentful against the people who run them. The Democratic spending bills are economic packages that serve moral and cultural purposes. They should be measured by their cultural impact, not merely by some wonky analysis. In real, tangible ways, they would redistribute dignity back downward. They would support hundreds of thousands of jobs for home health care workers, child care workers, construction workers, metal workers, supply chain workers. They would ease the indignity millions of parents face having to raise their children in poverty.  David Brooks NYT 2021