It certainly is impressive, but I just don't think it's Nobel-worthy.
I think its nobel worthy because I think the committee was recognizing the *global* nature of the impact of the obama phenomenon; we -- america -- shook the world, first of all, with his election; second, he -- obama shook the world with his international presence, speeches, signalling this change of tone not only for american foreign policy, but a new era of cooperation internationally.
Thats what he won for.
Remember his speeches in germany, europe, middle east, russia?
Remember the size of those international crowds?
And remember what he said there? International cooperation was his theme at every stop. International responsibility -- america wont be blamed alone any more, now everyone must do their part. No more name calling, no more laying the blame at the doorstep of the west. Personal responsibility -- and cooperation -- and common interests.
Environmental responsibility is now a global responsiblity. nuclear disarmament is now a global responsiblity.
He delivered this message of cooperation internationally after a long period of american isolation and international resentment and polarization. He changed the international mood in less than year. Thats what he won for -- for that international trip, the change in mood, the change at the UN, the change on environmental cooperation, on nuclear disarmament. How much more - in a year - does a guy have to do to 'deserve' the nobel peace prize? How quickly should he have changed 8 years of polarization and isolation before he 'deserved' the nobel?
How much personal courage did it take for him to face down that 8 year legacy with so much conviction - and persuasiveness? How much more did he have to put his convictions on the line before a truly international audience, before he 'deserved' the nobel?
To say that he overcame domestic resistance to this message (enough to get elected), and overcame internatinal polarization to go deliver it directly to international masses/audience -- we dont realize just what kind of state even the democratic party was in, just a year ago. It was a shambles. The entire mood of the country was glum, gloom and doom, irritable, angry, violent, ready to hang the next person who talked about cooperation as a 'traitor'. This was the environment just a year ago, even domestically. All this he put himself on the line to oppose, and did so with grace.
Its one thing to not want to *overstate* his achievements; its another to try to pretend like they werent there.