geekhack

geekhack Community => Other Geeky Stuff => Topic started by: Azuremen on Mon, 06 December 2010, 21:15:42

Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Mon, 06 December 2010, 21:15:42
Well, I've seen the game's name pop in new member threads, people looking for ideal keyboards, and mention of pro players. Figured a thread might be in order as more and more SCII players seem to be making their way here from OCN, TL, Reddit, and so on.

So, figured I'd make a thread trying to consolidate said interest. So, who plays SC2? :P Perhaps we can get a practice going for some players, or replay submission for review - I know some people are learning the game from a fresh RTS background, and peer input is awesome to have when people actually have a clue what they are talking about (and I am assuming some people have a clue) so others can learn. I'll put a list of people together on Geekhack that play, provided they want to be on it, and update in this first post.

As for myself, I've been playing SC and BW since their release, and WarCraft 2 before that. Played in the SC2 Beta, playing Random till Phase 2, where I settled on Protoss (was also a Protoss in BW) and placed Diamond. I've been less active in ladder but fairly consistent in my practice, where my regular practice group is around 2000+ points Diamond. I like giving feedback and input on play and such.

So, talk about StarCraft! GSL, MLG, your games, your mom's games, whatever.


GeekHack SC2 Player list

Azuremen - gtAzire.359 (http://sc2ranks.com/us/823747/gtAzire)
jimmy919 - Junior (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/628802/1/Junior/)
godamajin - Fuqnaround (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1333132/1/Fuqnaround/)
Daniel Beaver - Beaver.399 (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1042192/1/Beaver/)
elbowglue - Elbowglue.640 (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1200934/1/Elbowglue/)
Viett - Viett (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/988585/1/Viett/)
AndrewZorn - AndrewZorn.843 (http://sc2ranks.com/us/901320/AndrewZorn)
CodeChef - Sinasis.908 (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1084121/1/Sinasis/)
ShoeFactory - Shoey.467 (http://sc2ranks.com/us/717081/Shoey)
mian2222 - Grace.256
jdreamer - DreameR.825 (http://sc2ranks.com/us/2133488/jdreamer)
dareuhl - dareUHL.682
whiterice - wang.700 (http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/266473/Wang)
BlueRain - Blue.517 (http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/709044/Blue)
NewbieOneKenobi - Newbieone.967 (http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1744281/1/NewbieOne/) (EU)
DanGWanG - Wang.187 (http://sc2ranks.com/us/583589/Wang)
cometbus - cometbus.465 (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/2439883/1/cometbus/)
shablaGOO - shablaGOO.870 (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1252111/1/shablaGOO/)
sawedust - sawedust.851 (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1631097/1/sawedust/)
Qwerty - Mittens.506
slueth - Novelty.500 (http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/2130028/Novelty)
speakeasy - SpeaKEaSY.238 (http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/2055697/SpeaKEaSY)
Kelsin - Kelsin.935 (http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/280904/Kelsin)
Satisfaktion - Satisfaktion.885 (http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/268882/Satisfaktion)
sinani206 - Sinani.145 (http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/1591439/Sinani)
XiP - XiP.893 (http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/568065/XiP)
NeverDie - NeverDie.804 (http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/2554633/NeverDie)
Chojo31 - chojo.488 (http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/270487/Chojo)
PerfectError - Perfecterror.170 (http://sc2ranks.com/us/1965587/PerfectError)
qvidtar - Qvindtar.277
Nautilus - Nautilus.267 (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/2625912/1/Nautilus/)
shako - Shako.512 (EU)
Valeranth - brandon.1823
krull - Krull.805
skyblue - skyblue.775
hfcobra - CobR.561
sndstrm - sndstrm.186
circularboxes - Bonar.240
vincewchan - Vitamin.613
systemA - Bubbles.557
Zet - Zet.291
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: NewbieOneKenobi on Mon, 06 December 2010, 21:44:22
I got SC2 digital version off battle.net itself a couple of days ago. The price was good, 30 euro or something. I've done 6 missions in the campaign, played some vs computer and managed to get gold in all of the challenges.

I've played SC1 before but probably never in multiplayer. Didn't manage to beat the BW campaign, either. Warcraft 3 and 2 too. I was probably somewhat better than average in multiplayer.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: fssbzz on Mon, 06 December 2010, 21:54:19
noob SCII player here. but.the game is truly entertaining even i get owned or pawned all the time lol.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: jimmy919 on Mon, 06 December 2010, 21:56:20
I'm a big Starcraft 2 player as it's one of the few games that doesn't make me motion-sick.  Played SC1 in high school, college, and for several years after college (isn't that the sign of a great game?).  Played SC2 while in beta, and then tons more after it came out.  I play Random, but would say I'm most proficient with Zerg or Protoss.  

I'd be down for playing with other GeekHack folks.  Here's my profile  (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/628802/1/Junior/)info off of Battle.net

My Cherry G80-11900LUMEU-2 just arrived today and I'm giving those MX Blacks a spin.  Don't like the super-small Ctrl button for SC2, but the keys feel good and at $40 off eBay, way better than buying one of those SteelSeries 6GV2s or Razer BlackWidows.
Title: StarCraft II is the reason I'm here.
Post by: godamajin on Tue, 07 December 2010, 06:45:04
 (http://://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1333132/1/Fuqnaround/)Actually my finding this site can't be blamed on Blizzard alone. You see, I enjoy games. I love them so much that I will upgrade or adjust every component or setting until I reach that sweet spot where the mouse sensitivity is extraordinary and you online experience gaming is wonderful and LAGLESS. This is after hours of mouse fix, video field of vision adjustment to config files in the game root directory so you get that perfect crisp text with image quality that drinks you inside a very real world blocking out any hint that you left the physical plane via mental craft work only skilled game developers code into your preexisting addictive personality. Sadly these settings come at huge cost in time searching out specific forums for those extra tips others have tried and took the time to share. Still more cost comes at the frustration you get when you realize that the settings, while ideal for Battlefield Bad Company do not carry over to Modern Warfare or Star Craft. Whats more,I've sunk thousands of dollars just on mice, keyboards and audio equipment (earphones and speakers), gimmick game surfaces, ergonomic chairs and arm rests. An equal amount thrown at getting my windows experience to provide me a solid 7.6 and a consistent 200 fps on my favorite first person shooter. Then Star Craft blows all my performance to hell. luck to get 60 fps per game and lag is unplayable at times. I find myself getting worse and they have demoted me from 2 leagues already. I have sent them a rage email for which I later sent an apology to Blizzard to which they replied with a lol.

I live near Blizzard and have friends that work there yet I can't progress at these games. It comes down to the fact that I am easily flustered when harassed, I am weak psychologically. This is what I have determined finally through the above process of elimination. That for all the resources both real and virtual I spend trying to put myself in an advantage over an opponent, an early worker rush or harass will deflate me rather easily causing a rash of cursing and table pounding and a quick alt+F4.
But Im always down to playhttp://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1333132/1/Fuqnaround/ (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1333132/1/Fuqnaround/)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Tue, 07 December 2010, 09:57:55
My BNet profile page. (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1042192/1/Beaver/) Add me, I like playing, Beaver#399. My computer is still en-route down to Puerto Rico, but once it gets here I'll have time again to play.

The next patch is likely to implement chat channel support in Battle.net, so we should set up a GeekHack channel.

Go Jinro!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: kriminal on Tue, 07 December 2010, 10:11:42
puerto rico eh?!? your're probably my closest geekhacker...
i have played SC since the original release, so far after a couple months of played sc2 competitively i have lost interest.. :(
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: NewbieOneKenobi on Tue, 07 December 2010, 10:57:21
Quote from: godamajin;258579
(http://://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1333132/1/Fuqnaround/)Actually my finding this site can't be blamed on Blizzard alone. You see, I enjoy games. I love them so much that I will upgrade or adjust every component or setting until I reach that sweet spot where the mouse sensitivity is extraordinary and you online experience gaming is wonderful and LAGLESS. This is after hours of mouse fix, video field of vision adjustment to config files in the game root directory so you get that perfect crisp text with image quality that drinks you inside a very real world blocking out any hint that you left the physical plane via mental craft work only skilled game developers code into your preexisting addictive personality. Sadly these settings come at huge cost in time searching out specific forums for those extra tips others have tried and took the time to share. Still more cost comes at the frustration you get when you realize that the settings, while ideal for Battlefield Bad Company do not carry over to Modern Warfare or Star Craft. Whats more,I've sunk thousands of dollars just on mice, keyboards and audio equipment (earphones and speakers), gimmick game surfaces, ergonomic chairs and arm rests. An equal amount thrown at getting my windows experience to provide me a solid 7.6 and a consistent 200 fps on my favorite first person shooter. Then Star Craft blows all my performance to hell. luck to get 60 fps per game and lag is unplayable at times. I find myself getting worse and they have demoted me from 2 leagues already. I have sent them a rage email for which I later sent an apology to Blizzard to which they replied with a lol.

I live near Blizzard and have friends that work there yet I can't progress at these games. It comes down to the fact that I am easily flustered when harassed, I am weak psychologically. This is what I have determined finally through the above process of elimination. That for all the resources both real and virtual I spend trying to put myself in an advantage over an opponent, an early worker rush or harass will deflate me rather easily causing a rash of cursing and table pounding and a quick alt+F4.
But Im always down to playhttp://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1333132/1/Fuqnaround/ (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1333132/1/Fuqnaround/)



Hey. I don't like some of the typical features of Blizzard ladders but I guess they're similar in all fps: full-time multiplayer players play the game in a much different way from those who mostly play single-player and jump from game to game. Specific, time-tweaked build orders, heavy use of hotkeys, some people with great Internet connections and very powerful rigs that can have 60 fps and near-0 ping, youngsters with agile fingers etc.

Myself, I'm kinda slow (getting thirtyish) and not that great at multi-tasking (poor fine motorics and coordination according to some examination back in highschool), with a tendency to limit the effort to what will suffice as opposed to putting in the max. This way I just can't produce the same war effort as the pros (who actually tend to have a life) or the "gosus". And I get frustrated too when there's too much monkey business going on, such as insane micro (dancing the units) or fast-expanding all over the map with 100000 towers. Thankfully, there's not so much of the latter with Starcraft II as with Warcraft 3. However, it is much easier to overpower an unprepared enemy, especially if you catch him by surprise. Just fly some tanks and marines over in the medivacs that serve as dropships... deploy the tanks in siege mode, guard them with marines with plenty of healing (after all, you needed quite a lot of medivacs to carry the tanks). If he doesn't have his own tanks, you're in trouble. Same way, players caught without a fleet or when you actually pull off a massive ground army (e.g. thors) when your opponent is trying to be fancy. In such situations, generally the best economist wins unless the micro kid can mess his unit AI beyond repair or a good strategist manages to strike swiftly where it hurts.

Sorry for ranting.

By the way, guys, be warned there might be some problems with Crossfire or SLI in Starcraft 2. Some people claim it works fine (doing what it's supposed to do), others get better performance when they disable it. Newest drivers supposedly help and there were rumours of some patch from Blizzard helping matters (before, they said there was no coding in SC2 to take advantage of multiple card setups).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Manyak on Tue, 07 December 2010, 11:12:26
Quote from: godamajin;258579
(http://://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1333132/1/Fuqnaround/)Actually my finding this site can't be blamed on Blizzard alone. You see, I enjoy games. I love them so much that I will upgrade or adjust every component or setting until I reach that sweet spot where the mouse sensitivity is extraordinary and you online experience gaming is wonderful and LAGLESS. This is after hours of mouse fix, video field of vision adjustment to config files in the game root directory so you get that perfect crisp text with image quality that drinks you inside a very real world blocking out any hint that you left the physical plane via mental craft work only skilled game developers code into your preexisting addictive personality. Sadly these settings come at huge cost in time searching out specific forums for those extra tips others have tried and took the time to share.


Well, if you decide you want the best screen in the world to game on too, I've got a GDM-FW900 for sale. :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: elbowglue on Tue, 07 December 2010, 11:23:31
Nice Maynak - how much you selling it for? What do you think about the FW-900 vs the new 120hz lcd monitors?

Here's my profile:
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1200934/1/Elbowglue/
Currently #431 in the world and #121 in the US in random 2v2 according to sc2ranks.com. (hellll yeah)

Not that I have any skill, 2v2 is a funny bird, but a bird I usually know how to cook.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Tue, 07 December 2010, 12:14:50
Hot damn that's a lot of 2v2 games. I find multi-team play much more difficult than 1v1.

For those of you who are worried about skills, we can always play a 4v4, or a comp stomp. Starcraft is, unfortunately, a game where skill disparities are amplified.

Manyak: Yum. Outside my budget, unfortunately.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Twitchy on Tue, 07 December 2010, 12:29:51
Nearly 40 years old + First non-console game in over 20 years + More time spent watching MLG/GSL/Day[9] than spent playing = Very few games won

I'm still loving it though :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: elbowglue on Tue, 07 December 2010, 12:55:10
Quote from: Daniel Beaver;258772
Hot damn that's a lot of 2v2 games. I find multi-team play much more difficult than 1v1.

For those of you who are worried about skills, we can always play a 4v4, or a comp stomp. Starcraft is, unfortunately, a game where skill disparities are amplified.


Yeah that explains why I hardly ever post on Geekhack anymore.

We should play a 4v4 have Mic on all the time.  That would be kinda funny to have all the click and clack obscuring our ability to communicate :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: shmithers on Tue, 07 December 2010, 13:35:43
I seem to be watching more Starcraft than I am playing. I qualified as silver when I first got the game, but after countless hours of watching day9, build order practicing, custom playing I feel like I should be at least gold, but I still have to play some League games to see how I am doing.

My main problem is I can't seem to multi task enough mid to late game. (I can't even properly macro off of 3 base, 2 base seems to be where is at for me :P

Anyway:

GO JINRO:
(http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/4175/sojujinrogfdl.jpg)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Manyak on Tue, 07 December 2010, 14:59:46
Quote from: elbowglue;258737
Nice Maynak - how much you selling it for? What do you think about the FW-900 vs the new 120hz lcd monitors?

Believe me, for video games there is NOTHING like a good CRT. Right now I'm using a Dell U3011 (brand new 30" 12-bit IPS) and I still think the FW-900 blows it away. And if you think the 120Hz LCDs have smooth motion in games, think again. Besides the ghosting (which if you can't notice right now you will notice after using a CRT), the colors are also very inaccurate on those panels because they're made for speed.

I'm very reluctant to give it up, but there's some sort of interference in my new office/computer room (we moved) that causes the image to jiggle. If I take it to the opposite side of my house (the dining room) it works fine, but it's not like I can set my PC up over there. So I got screwed into selling it :(

Either way, I'm asking for $400 + shipping.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Viett on Tue, 07 December 2010, 15:11:07
I've played SC since I was about 11 until when SCII Beta came out. Now I play SCII fairly regularly.

My profile. (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/988585/1/Viett/)

I mostly play 2v2s with a partner I've had since the old BW 2v2 Python days.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Arc'xer on Tue, 07 December 2010, 15:42:42
Quote from: elbowglue;258737
Nice Maynak - how much you selling it for? What do you think about the FW-900 vs the new 120hz lcd monitors?

The 120hz LCDs are 80-85% as good as a CRT but they will never be as good, nor any LCD except maybe some of those very high-end, high-bit color LCDs and even then there are limits.

Most if not all LCDs have some input lag (http://www.behardware.com/articles/632-1/lcds-images-delayed-compared-to-crts-yes.html), there are a few LCDs with no input lag and some with enabled modes that allow for no input lag. Also paying for the quality of better colors and better panels like some of those 1000-5000+ dollar plus monitors and you better believe they will have very high levels of input lag 25-50ms+. So yet again you have a trade off either you go TN panel and 120hz or pay a little more for color quality and stick with 60hz. On a higher end CRT you get both in particular to aperture grille-style CRTs.

The response time(amount of time it takes for pixels to change state) of a CRT is around the high nanosecond, low microsecond if they are of good quality and have good quality phosphors. That's one to two magnitudes lower than an LCD. On an LCD the response time is 2-8ms but that's for WtW, BtB, GtG not for the other colors(which is ironic because LCDs can never display black due to being indirect light and yet they can do so quickly) and that's response time on top of refresh rate. So if your LCD is 60hz(or 1000/60 = 16.6666667 milliseconds), the WtW, GtG, BtB is 16.68(rounded) + 2-8ms. As for the other colors that number ranges from the refresh rate itself(some colors on some panels can be as fast) all the way up and over 100 milliseconds and that's on top of the refresh rate.

A 2003 google archive article I read a few years ago comparing a CRT vs an LCD even though TN panels made cheap ass CRTs look like ****. Even the cheapest crappiest, headache causing, eye murdering CRT still had a truer refresh rate and a response time that was 1-2 magnitudes better. Despite the fact that some of them had such low quality phosphors that they would actually have phosphor decay for several milliseconds even flickering at refresh rates like 80-90Hz.

Refresh rate though is the best part of a CRT. Being able to see more complete frames or having a bigger divisor to divide larger and or smaller frame rates. Despite the fact the FW900 has a weaker ramdac compared to say it's younger cousin the GDM-F520 or some of the other aperture grille CRTs like the Nec diamondtrons. It more than makes up for it with it's image quality, despite having lesser refresh rate and being widescreen.

FW900 1920x1080 100hz (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ9Tf1MLme8&hd=1)

Despite the fact that's a video and there's a limit to how much you can see. I can easily tell that monitor has some amazing colors through the video.

This is the big thread on the FW900 (http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=952788), there's even a post to modify the sharpness of the monitor using it's internal knobs (http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=1030076125&postcount=2323), seems dangerous though.

Unfortunately it's a CRT, which was discontinued over 6 or 7 years ago. Like many high-end CRTs no matter how careful you preserve them they are well aged and considering how much more a monitor is used compared to a CRT television. They just don't last as long as a CRT TV, if someone came out and said they are going to make brand new CRT monitor using the latest electronics and making it energy efficient and whatnot with better more modern parts, so many people would jump on buying one.

There are some people who took gaming so seriously on CRTs that literally it changed their vision on how they played games. I recall running into a number of CRT users who said when they played on LCDs it was a slide show literally. Some of these people were gaming on refresh rates as high as 200Hz, so what they saw was vastly different then an LCD user. So much so some quit gaming and some who didn't understand it was the CRT itself that helped them out, when they moved to LCD or their CRT died and they had no alternative.

Like Manyak has posted quite a few times the 3 most important peripherals are the monitor, mouse, and keyboard.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Lanx on Tue, 07 December 2010, 15:47:18
Quote from: Arc'xer;259045

There are some people who took gaming so seriously on CRTs that literally it changed their vision on how they played games. I recall running into a number of CRT users who said when they played on LCDs it was a slide show literally. Some of these people were gaming on refresh rates as high as 200Hz, so what they saw was vastly different then an LCD user. So much so some quit gaming and some who didn't understand it was the CRT itself that helped them out.


Is this like how ppl in those 1v1 fighting games like tekken or street fighter can "count frames".
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: elbowglue on Tue, 07 December 2010, 15:51:06
damn.  I need to start horking these old KB's that I don't use and save up for that FW900.  I used to have insufficient desk space for such a beast but now I might cause I put my keyboard onto a keyboard tray..  I'll PM ya if I can scratch up the dough. :)

My dilemma is that with a good CRT I need my system to crank out probably 100 fps constant on whatever game I want to play.  Currently I use a Dell 2209wa overclocked to 74hz refresh, running at 1680x1050.  I have a 4:3 dell trinitron CRT but because of the aspect ratio on it I don't want to lose the side parts of my vision on SC2, thus I would have to run it with black bars on top and bottom.  So the only CRT that I know of that is native wide screen in the FW900, but I'd need to pretty much build a new system to get the 100fps on SC2 to drive the monitor to it's fullest extent..  too bad money dosen't grow on trees.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Arc'xer on Tue, 07 December 2010, 16:03:08
Quote from: Lanx;259049
Is this like how ppl in those 1v1 fighting games like tekken or street fighter can "count frames".


I've never heard of said "counting". I have read of people timing their actions to certain frame rates of a move. Like canceling an action within the specific area to chain it to another or something.

But I think that's more of a practice muscle memory thing.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: microsoft windows on Tue, 07 December 2010, 16:06:03
Quote from: Manyak;258969

I'm very reluctant to give it up, but there's some sort of interference in my new office/computer room (we moved) that causes the image to jiggle. If I take it to the opposite side of my house (the dining room) it works fine, but it's not like I can set my PC up over there. So I got screwed into selling it :(

Either way, I'm asking for $400 + shipping.


Make sure there are no magnets, AC adapters, or speakers near your monitor. I've had similar interference issues with my CRT's before.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Manyak on Tue, 07 December 2010, 18:05:18
Quote from: elbowglue;259055
damn.  I need to start horking these old KB's that I don't use and save up for that FW900.  I used to have insufficient desk space for such a beast but now I might cause I put my keyboard onto a keyboard tray..  I'll PM ya if I can scratch up the dough. :)

My dilemma is that with a good CRT I need my system to crank out probably 100 fps constant on whatever game I want to play.  Currently I use a Dell 2209wa overclocked to 74hz refresh, running at 1680x1050.  I have a 4:3 dell trinitron CRT but because of the aspect ratio on it I don't want to lose the side parts of my vision on SC2, thus I would have to run it with black bars on top and bottom.  So the only CRT that I know of that is native wide screen in the FW900, but I'd need to pretty much build a new system to get the 100fps on SC2 to drive the monitor to it's fullest extent..  too bad money dosen't grow on trees.

Alright, let me know :)

It's hard to sell these online because shipping is so expensive and has to be arranged freight, and there's never a demand for anything locally, so I might have it for a while.

Quote from: microsoft windows;259065
Make sure there are no magnets, AC adapters, or speakers near your monitor. I've had similar interference issues with my CRT's before.

I've tried flipping the breaker to cut power to this whole room, and then run an extension cord out to the dining room and plugged the monitor into a laptop on battery power. It didn't help.

Right now my best guess is the AC mains, since they're brought in right behind this wall on my left. And there isn't crap I can do about it.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Tue, 07 December 2010, 19:50:10
Quote
We should play a 4v4 have Mic on all the time. That would be kinda funny to have all the click and clack obscuring our ability to communicate :)
I keep my ventrilo chat with my mic on continuously, and my friends all ***** about my Filco with blues constantly. It's awesome.

And CRTs... CRTs are dreamy. After my monitor got stolen last year, I connected my space 19" CRT and played a bit of Modern Warfare 2 on it at 85Hz. To call it dramatically smoother is an understatement. But alas, I have no desk space.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Tue, 07 December 2010, 20:15:37
Wait, someone was saying 60 FPS is unplayable in SC2? Most pros just use the lowest graphics settings anyhow. And any gains of a higher refresh rate won't matter in a game like SC2, since there isn't anywhere near the need for twitch actions that depend on a key frame, but rather sound thought processes and problem assessment.

And wow, a lot of people playing team games. Though I guess that is more common these days. I just find team games skew massively towards "all-in" types of builds, rather than sound fundamental play styles.

Virtually nothing tends to translate from 2v2 to 1v1, aside maybe macro mechanics, which can always be practiced. And 2v2 and such tend to make you dependent on having an ally in those panic type situations where you get caught off guard or dropped, etc.

The best way to improve is in 1v1 games, though not ladder games necessarily. Practice games with friends so you can work out how to defend against something that is really bothering you is very, very helpful.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Twitchy on Wed, 08 December 2010, 03:13:14
I spend so much time in real life (which has a refresh rate of like a gazillion hertz) that I can see the electron beam scanning my CRT.:twitch:
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: CodeChef on Wed, 08 December 2010, 21:31:35
I played SC2 quite a bit last two months, always trying to get at least 1 game a day in but I can't deal with it anymore, my laptop makes the game lag so horribly that it honestly makes me play worse (15-20 fps tops)... Even Minecraft (which is now my main game) is unplayable with graphics on fancy and render distance to far. With gfx on fast it only lags a *bit* (30ish fps regular)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Twitchy on Fri, 10 December 2010, 00:33:11
Quote from: shmithers;258868
GO JINRO:
Show Image
(http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/4175/sojujinrogfdl.jpg)


This.

I'll be supporting Jinro today, but a victory for him will leave me with mixed feelings as it will knock out the last Protoss and leave us with a TvT final (I had hoped that HongUnPrime would knock out Rain so we'd have a 'toss in the final and my friends could stop whining about how disadvantaged the Protoss race is!).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Moogle Stiltzkin on Fri, 10 December 2010, 01:36:01
I play SC2 on SEA and US region servers.

Mostly Storm of the imperial sanctum mod map :X


I find it funny how they have a branded sc2 keyboard. As if that somehow necessarily makes it better for sc2  hehe :X
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Scarzy on Fri, 10 December 2010, 03:51:13
I play SC2 sometimes too, but I'm pretty awful at it. I guess I should maybe stick at it and try and get good, but I just don't think I'm cut out for playing RTS games :(




Quote from: Daniel Beaver;259208
I keep my ventrilo chat with my mic on continuously, and my friends all ***** about my Filco with blues constantly. It's awesome.

And CRTs... CRTs are dreamy. After my monitor got stolen last year, I connected my space 19" CRT and played a bit of Modern Warfare 2 on it at 85Hz. To call it dramatically smoother is an understatement. But alas, I have no desk space.


160hz on my Mitshubishi Diamond 220. I can't describe how moist 163FPS and 160hz feels in quake 3.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Fri, 10 December 2010, 08:29:28
I'm always looking to play, regardless of skill difference.

1v1: Gold, but rising fast and certain to be in Plat soon
2v2: Plat, but just demoted after being in Diamond for months, will be back soon

EDIT I am AndrewZorn#843
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Fri, 10 December 2010, 18:42:45
Well, I'm excited for the GSL finals now. Though not going to say anything here just yet since I imagine many people have not yet had the time to watch the games (I stayed up to watch them live)

I've also started updating the first post with a list of GeekHackers that play SC2 and have provided some of their info. Though it would be nice to get everyone's ID number as well, since it apparently isn't shown on the B.net page (from what I can tell)

Also, would anyone be interested in a King of the Hill or such between the GH'ers? Just as a casual serious of games perhaps to practice and have fun with.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: CodeChef on Fri, 10 December 2010, 20:04:07
Oh, yeah.

Sinasis #908

I'm pretty bad (I would say I'm mid-to-high silver but I play in high bronze)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: elbowglue on Sat, 11 December 2010, 10:15:27
Elbowglue #640 here

Whats your ID azureman?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: ShoeFactory on Sat, 11 December 2010, 11:43:12
Shoey.467 here

I'm a 2550 diamond zerg.

I got my first mechanical keyboard (compaq mx11800) a couple of weeks ago and am new to these forums. There was a big buzz in the sc2 community when fruitdealer won GSL1 and he used a filco -- partially the reason I'm here. Are there any other TLers here?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Sat, 11 December 2010, 11:55:42
Quote from: ShoeFactory;261366
Shoey.467 here

I'm a 2550 diamond zerg.

I got my first mechanical keyboard (compaq mx11800) a couple of weeks ago and am new to these forums. There was a big buzz in the sc2 community when fruitdealer won GSL1 and he used a filco -- partially the reason I'm here. Are there any other TLers here?

Wow

I frequent the forums, but am nowhere near as good as you.  How's the Compaq working for you in SC2?  I couldn't get used to the feel, and mine has been in the box since I bought it (yes, my feel-testing was conducted with the keyboard in the box).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: elbowglue on Sat, 11 December 2010, 12:06:20
Quote from: ShoeFactory;261366
I got my first mechanical keyboard (compaq mx11800) a couple of weeks ago and am new to these forums. There was a big buzz in the sc2 community when fruitdealer won GSL1 and he used a filco -- partially the reason I'm here. Are there any other TLers here?

Welcome shoefactory.  Consider taking a hacksaw to your MX11800(link) (http://geekhack.org/showwiki.php?title=Island:9542&do=comments&page=2) to get rid of the trackball and tenkeyless section.  Also, after you open it up I would suggest using some foamy type tape onto the PCB to stabilize it in relation to the case.  It makes the keyboard feel much nicer and less flexy.  Awesome choice of first keyboard, it is my daily work keyboard.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: ShoeFactory on Sat, 11 December 2010, 13:43:42
Quote from: AndrewZorn;261370
Wow

I frequent the forums, but am nowhere near as good as you.  How's the Compaq working for you in SC2?  I couldn't get used to the feel, and mine has been in the box since I bought it (yes, my feel-testing was conducted with the keyboard in the box).

The compaq is great. I love the feel of it, it's a pleasure to type and play on. I'm definitely keeping the compaq until I get a premium keyboard like a filco (not in too much of a rush because I am liking this compaq.


Quote from: elbowglue;261374
Welcome shoefactory.  Consider taking a hacksaw to your MX11800(link) (http://geekhack.org/showwiki.php?title=Island:9542&do=comments&page=2) to get rid of the trackball and tenkeyless section.  Also, after you open it up I would suggest using some foamy type tape onto the PCB to stabilize it in relation to the case.  It makes the keyboard feel much nicer and less flexy.  Awesome choice of first keyboard, it is my daily work keyboard.

Oh that foam is a really good idea. I've been wondering about the PBC flex -- I'll do that today. The trackball is pretty ugly; i might indeed cut that off.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: elbowglue on Sat, 11 December 2010, 15:18:14
You may find that you like the compaq better than the filco (which I personaly do).  Bottoming out on the compaq MX11800 is very nice, wherehas bottoming out on the filco is like running into a metal wall.

If you read in the compaq mx11800 hacksaw thread, there is a point where I have a picture that says "ricercar cut here" - if you cut it along that line there is no need for soldering.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Sat, 11 December 2010, 15:58:14
Quote from: ShoeFactory;261366
Shoey.467 here

I'm a 2550 diamond zerg.

I got my first mechanical keyboard (compaq mx11800) a couple of weeks ago and am new to these forums. There was a big buzz in the sc2 community when fruitdealer won GSL1 and he used a filco -- partially the reason I'm here. Are there any other TLers here?


I use TL as a resource, but rarely post on the forums at this point. There just isn't that much good info in the strategy section and I just get news from my mumble group.

As for the keyboards, I actually got pointed towards keyboards after I tested some Razer gear at PAX, namely the Marauder (woo APM). Which got me looking into keyboards and ultimately resulted in me ending up here after realizing info here is far better than at OCN.

And a good zerg is scary. My practice partner for my PvZ is around that level and I'm honestly at a loss.

Quote from: elbowglue;261338
Elbowglue #640 here

Whats your ID azureman?


Oh, I'll put it up there I guess.

gtAzire - 359

I've not laddered much recently and so my ranking is just not a good idicator of my play level. 930 point bonus pool and my MMR puts me against 2000 point players (which can be depressingly bad)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: mian2222 on Sat, 11 December 2010, 21:19:29
Hey, I'm Grace 256. I would love to play with you guys. I'm only named Grace after my good friend. I'm not a she. So don't hit on me. Or hit on me whatever. :P. I'm not very good, made it to Gold League but deserve to be on Bronze (really).

Also, off topic but if you any of you guys play Heroes of Newerth (I play HoN much more) I'm ohboymyo. I used to be good but after like a 30 game losing streak seems like I suck at this game too! Oh well, add me if you ever play this!

I also just joined GH a few weeks ago. Having fun learning a lot about keyboards.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Sat, 11 December 2010, 21:34:38
Is there even a way to add a person without the code or email?

EDIT finished adding everyone I could, add me!  And if anyone uses Xfire, I'm AndrewZorn.  As I don't run SC2 in the background all day, that's probably a better way to find me.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: fssbzz on Sat, 11 December 2010, 21:41:25
right click, and add as friend.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: CodeChef on Sat, 11 December 2010, 21:42:53
Quote from: AndrewZorn;261564
Is there even a way to add a person without the code or email?

EDIT finished adding everyone I could, add me!  And if anyone uses Xfire, I'm AndrewZorn.  As I don't run SC2 in the background all day, that's probably a better way to find me.


Be friends with them on Facebook?

Speaking of which... GEEKHACK FACEBOOK GROUP!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Sat, 11 December 2010, 23:06:43
Quote from: fssbzz;261567
right click, and add as friend.

...if I'm in the game, but how do I do it if I can't see their profile in the game?  That's what I'm saying.

Short of doing sc2ranks searches, which I'm not willing.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Sun, 12 December 2010, 00:24:25
Quote from: AndrewZorn;261587
...if I'm in the game, but how do I do it if I can't see their profile in the game?  That's what I'm saying.

Short of doing sc2ranks searches, which I'm not willing.


Match history is the easiest way to add people without their friend codes.

I spent some time in team games today and mass 3/3 marines with medivacs are hilarious. 113 marines and 19 medivacs at the end of the game. Ruined so many lives.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: mian2222 on Sun, 12 December 2010, 01:05:08
Yeah I think its unfortunate Bnet decided to forego unique identities. It was much easier to friend back then. Now you're only supposed to friend people you know or something.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Sun, 12 December 2010, 10:08:48
Quote from: Azuremen;261600
Match history is the easiest way to add people without their friend codes.

I spent some time in team games today and mass 3/3 marines with medivacs are hilarious. 113 marines and 19 medivacs at the end of the game. Ruined so many lives.

Right, but having not played these people, I cannot do that.  My point is that I think we need emails or ID#s to be able to add the people that want to play.

Quote from: mian2222;261606
Yeah I think its unfortunate Bnet decided to forego unique identities. It was much easier to friend back then. Now you're only supposed to friend people you know or something.

I was going to start agreeing with you, and then transition into Battle.net 2.0 hatred, but it's better just said that Bnet2.0 is an awful, poorly-thought-out excuse for an online community that epitomizes the dumbing-down of games.  It is the worst part about SC2 by far, and makes its predecessor from over a decade ago look advanced.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Sun, 12 December 2010, 10:55:54
Quote from: Azuremen;261600
Match history is the easiest way to add people without their friend codes.

I spent some time in team games today and mass 3/3 marines with medivacs are hilarious. 113 marines and 19 medivacs at the end of the game. Ruined so many lives.
Indeed, I'm ranked fairly high in 2v2, and terran infantry is definitely "OP."  It's mostly OP because no one seems to use psi storm or infestors at all, surprisingly.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Sun, 12 December 2010, 11:12:51
Infestors
Ultralisks

Colloxen
Storm

Siege Tanks
Hellions



there
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: ShoeFactory on Sun, 12 December 2010, 12:46:42
Quote from: AndrewZorn;261564
Is there even a way to add a person without the code or email?

EDIT finished adding everyone I could, add me!  And if anyone uses Xfire, I'm AndrewZorn.  As I don't run SC2 in the background all day, that's probably a better way to find me.


Theres a tab arrow on the right side of the chat box so when you finish the game you can click the tab and right click the portrait to add as a friend.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Sun, 12 December 2010, 12:49:42
Yet again I'll explain

I know how to add a friend if I see them in SC2 somehow

HOWEVER

Having a list of usernames at the top of the thread... with no emails or ID#s... does not give enough information to be able to add a friend.

Unless I'm missing some way to do it from the Bnet link.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hate on Sun, 12 December 2010, 12:56:58
hate 157 on eu, just restarted playing 1/1

http://www.sc2ranks.com/eu/837099/hate
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Sun, 12 December 2010, 14:26:48
Quote from: AndrewZorn;261706
Infestors
Ultralisks

Colloxen
Storm

Siege Tanks
Hellions



there
I'm not sure if that was directed at me.  My point wasn't that there aren't units that can efficiently kill infantry, but rather that even in high ranked games, I find that my opponents do not get those units.  I can honestly say that < 5% of my opponents use storm or infestors.  Ultralisks are too late, and it's difficult to get a 2nd expo in a 2v2.  Siege tanks are good.  Hellion don't do well against infantry, and I find Colossai easy to counter, since I already have a reactor starport.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Sun, 12 December 2010, 14:41:00
I was referring to those as being good vs massed marines, but not to be demeaning to you.  Those units always give me the most trouble.

Hellions aren't good late game, but everyone always underestimates the mobility and AoE of blue flame Hellions mid-game.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Sun, 12 December 2010, 14:51:04
Indeed, my standard build "for fun" these days is gas before rax with a quick hellion marine harrass...

1 rax rines
immediate factory hellion
banshee
expansion
+2x rax
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Sun, 12 December 2010, 16:20:23
Quote from: AndrewZorn;261804
I was referring to those as being good vs massed marines, but not to be demeaning to you.  Those units always give me the most trouble.

Hellions aren't good late game, but everyone always underestimates the mobility and AoE of blue flame Hellions mid-game.


Upgraded Hellions rape in late game. Part of why Zergs don't like getting hydra against Terran.

Crypt, define high rated. I see all those anti-infantry units on a regular basis.

And Ultra really don't do that well against Marines because they can be Stim kited. Banelings with a few Infestors on the other hand...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hate on Mon, 13 December 2010, 06:33:56
mass infantry is the counter to ultras.
helions are terrible for anything other than economy harasment.

infestors right now are not so popular due to their high gas cost and the infantry tank style that most terrans play. infestors die too fast to tank fire + you need to micro banelings at the same time so they dont hit tanks or marauders.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Fwiffo on Mon, 13 December 2010, 08:49:58
Quote from: Crypt;261787
I'm not sure if that was directed at me.  My point wasn't that there aren't units that can efficiently kill infantry, but rather that even in high ranked games, I find that my opponents do not get those units.  I can honestly say that < 5% of my opponents use storm or infestors.  Ultralisks are too late, and it's difficult to get a 2nd expo in a 2v2.  Siege tanks are good.  Hellion don't do well against infantry, and I find Colossai easy to counter, since I already have a reactor starport.

It takes forever to tech up to storm, and it's usually a more awkward path to get to than colossus. Protoss is almost always going to build a robo facility because you're probably opening with banshees, and they need observers (and even if you aren't going banshee, observers are still really good). They're just one building away from colossus.

To get storm, you first have to get twilight council, which you usually want to get eventually for the upgrades, but is less urgent than detection. Maybe you'll have it early if you open blink stalker or DT rush... Then you have to get the templar archives, then you have to research storm and then you have to research the amulet before you can use it effectively. If you don't have the amulet, you're warping in units that have to stand around and do nothing for half an hour while their energy builds up (at least ghosts have a regular attack). And it's harder to use correctly than colossus, and by the time you get storm and can use it, ghosts will already be out, which makes it a huge crap-shoot.

Storm is great, don't get me wrong, but there's a very good reason you don't see it unless a game goes like 30+ minutes, and most games don't.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Mon, 13 December 2010, 09:22:42
Quote from: Azuremen;261841
Crypt, define high rated. I see all those anti-infantry units on a regular basis.
We're consistently matched against top 10 2v2 teams, some of which are surprisingly bad, TBH, even for team players.  The only anti-infantry units I see regularly are Siege Tanks and Colossai (which I find easy to counter.)

@Fwiffo:
It's 2v2, so my partner always techs everything while focusing on Zealots to conserve gas.  We're able to get to psi storm in most games that way.  Charge Zealots + HT and any random Terran army is good vs. almost anything.

I think the problem of the other teams is that they're still playing like it's a double 1v1 match instead of playing off the strengths and weaknesses of a combined 2 race army.  As an aside, Banshee rushes aren't nearly as common against us as low tech attacks.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hate on Mon, 13 December 2010, 13:37:37
even after the reaper nerf 2/2 is terribly broken, there are very good 80-90% win rate builds out there
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Mon, 13 December 2010, 14:28:29
I'd like to know what they are as I've heard of no such thing.  I know 2v2 isn't considered nearly as competitive as 1v1 but I still think it is fairly 'balanced'.

I became #1 worldwide in 2v2 Platinum last night.  I want to get back into Diamond again so much.  10 game win streak.  Plat games aren't as fun (aside from all the winning).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Mon, 13 December 2010, 14:52:42
I never see reapers in 2v2.  Then again, we're usually T/P, and maybe people don't like to reaper against that combo?

On the other hand, I've won a good % of games with drone rush, LOL!  (double extractor trick to get 12 drones and attack!)  I think one team we beat like that was rank 5 or so...ridiculous.

@Andrew, what races do you guys play...or do you play in random teams?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Mon, 13 December 2010, 15:27:19
You rarely see reapers anymore after everyone cried about them.

T/Z
remember only platinum now though
and im only gold 1v1 but i dont play that as much
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Mon, 13 December 2010, 17:29:10
Quote from: hate;262156
mass infantry is the counter to ultras.
helions are terrible for anything other than economy harasment.

infestors right now are not so popular due to their high gas cost and the infantry tank style that most terrans play. infestors die too fast to tank fire + you need to micro banelings at the same time so they dont hit tanks or marauders.


Umm. What?

Hellions melt Zealot Sentry. Like "lol MELTING" status. Against Zerg, they ruin Hydras and Lings. Good for a bit more beyond harass.

At the 1300 point level, yes, people don't use infestors. I can't remember the last time I didn't see a Zerg get Infestors.

Quote from: Crypt;262234
We're consistently matched against top 10 2v2 teams, some of which are surprisingly bad, TBH, even for team players.  The only anti-infantry units I see regularly are Siege Tanks and Colossai (which I find easy to counter.)


2v2 high level and 1v1 high level are completely different beasts. I've seen 2v2 teams that literally just all-in every game and have no clue how to play anything resembling a standard game, and these are diamond 2v2 teams. Often, the better a group is at team games, the worse each player is in 1v1.

Quote from: AndrewZorn;262442
I'd like to know what they are as I've heard of no such thing.  I know 2v2 isn't considered nearly as competitive as 1v1 but I still think it is fairly 'balanced'.


You weren't around for the 6 or 7 pool with Proxy 6 rax reaper where you? One of the most "lol balance" things I ever saw. The depot before Barracks nerf killed that out mostly. But 2v2 is hardly balanced. So many early all-ins that are just brutally effective and so on.

Quote from: Fwiffo
Storm is great, don't get me wrong, but there's a very good reason you don't see it unless a game goes like 30+ minutes, and most games don't.


I generally get storm out before the 15 minute mark. If I scout tanks, I can get it out before 10 minutes. People talk about how impossible it is to tech to storm, but the time it takes to get there isn't the issue as much as the concern about Ghosts. I usually will get Storm out before I have Colossi out in PvZ.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Mon, 13 December 2010, 18:53:29
Quote from: Azuremen;262554
You weren't around for the 6 or 7 pool with Proxy 6 rax reaper where you? One of the most "lol balance" things I ever saw. The depot before Barracks nerf killed that out mostly. But 2v2 is hardly balanced. So many early all-ins that are just brutally effective and so on.

Why yes, I was around for that.  However, the past does not influence me when I use present-tense.

I don't see much to complain about in 2v2 that I don't complain about in 1v1.  Yes, it plays differently, T1 units win the game... that doesn't make it broken.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Mon, 13 December 2010, 20:13:48
Quote from: Azuremen;262554
2v2 high level and 1v1 high level are completely different beasts.
Agreed, that's why I tried to emphasize 2v2 and team games in every one of my posts.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Mon, 13 December 2010, 21:45:22
Quote from: AndrewZorn;262574
Why yes, I was around for that.  However, the past does not influence me when I use present-tense.

I don't see much to complain about in 2v2 that I don't complain about in 1v1.  Yes, it plays differently, T1 units win the game... that doesn't make it broken.


It could be I just see it all from a very different angle. I was talking to a gold level Protoss friend of mine, and he was complaining about Tanks in PvT. I was a bit surprised honestly, because I can't recall the last time I saw tanks in that match up - it is all bio play with Thors tossed in sometimes.

My complaint with team games is the depth of play is limited by the fact that as more people are on a team, the more effective all-ins become. Or insane rushes, like getting DTs out insanely fast while everyone else does T1 pressure.

Or Fungal Storm. Oh my it is soooo good.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Mon, 13 December 2010, 21:47:41
It's a lot more to keep up with for sure.  I don't feel like I'm getting better when I play it, compared to 1v1.

Back in Diamond 2v2 now, rank ~150 NA.  About time, but then again, I'm sure it will be gone soon.  I belong toward the lower Diamond, but Bnet keeps bouncing me back and forth between high Diamond and high Platinum (top 200NA for each).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Mon, 13 December 2010, 21:52:38
According to my understanding of TL ladder system speculation, the system will match you against people of your own skill...so if you get matched up against and go 50/50 against low diamond players, your rating should eventually equalize at that level.  In reality, that probably won't happen because it requires you to play so many games.  O_O

I play 2v2 to have fun with my friends.  I find that it's good practice for mechanics, though...so "all is not wasted" in terms of improving.  I also like to solo queue 3v3 and just send reapers to every base at once.  It's fun multitasking!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Mon, 13 December 2010, 21:57:20
That's the idea, but we usually beat all platinums, which throws us into high diamond.  lose to all high diamonds, so put back in platinum.

maybe im wrong, but this is the 3rd time we got promoted to diamond, and started in top 200NA.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Mon, 13 December 2010, 22:09:36
When you get promoted to diamond, it should match you against low diamonds if it was matching you against platinums before (according to the theory.)  I could see how it could be problematic if it wasn't.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Mon, 13 December 2010, 22:10:46
Quote from: AndrewZorn;262643
That's the idea, but we usually beat all platinums, which throws us into high diamond.  lose to all high diamonds, so put back in platinum.

maybe im wrong, but this is the 3rd time we got promoted to diamond, and started in top 200NA.


The issue is you are looking at their points, rather than thinking about their MMR. I play 2000 point players when I ladder at the moment because my MMR is so much higher than my points (1050)

Conversely, I had a friend that lost his placements intentionally, and was put into Bronze. It didn't take long for the system to be matching him against relatively high diamond players while still in Silver and Gold. And he would crush most of the them.

That and the win % in 2v2 for the higher rated teams are kind of high. Like, unrealistically high.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Mon, 13 December 2010, 22:28:34
Quote from: Crypt;262658
When you get promoted to diamond, it should match you against low diamonds if it was matching you against platinums before (according to the theory.)  I could see how it could be problematic if it wasn't.
It doesn't though.  I rack up points in high Plat, so stat in high Diamond right after.  Lose more than I win, get bumped back down to Plat.  Start over.

I know how the MMR stuff works, I'm saying the way the think "wow, 12 wins in a row, he needs to be in high diamond!" thing isnt working.
i know how the system is supposed to work.  my 2v2 experience is the exception.

1v1 feels pretty much right on.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Fishraper on Wed, 15 December 2010, 06:09:47
Blizzard doesn't balance the game with teams in mind, especially 3s and 4s. 2s somewhat if any, Blizzard said they were bringing 2v2 balances, but I don't think I've seen em (excluding Repears, which was for TvZ). SC2 has been bringing in bad rep from "WoW minded" players by saying this and that is "overpowered" or this and that need to be "nerfed".

Truth is, SC1 barely ever had balance patches and players just accepted the game for what it is and it went extremely far and is still kicking.

Also SC2 is very well balanced, the win ratio data of each matchup on every map has proven that. To add on that, SC2 is balanced to how well it can be played, i.e. GSL caliber type.

Catch the GSL finals at http://www.gomtv.net/ this Saturday Morning, 4:00am CST.

~$$87,000 on the line!!

I stream on TeamLiquid.net sometimes with my buddy for team games, and I'll also do my 1v1s if you guys are interested in checking it out if you happen to catch it online :P

http://www.teamliquid.net/video/userstream.php?user=Ponderous
http://www.own3d.tv/live/6817
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: jdreamer on Thu, 16 December 2010, 17:56:33
Hey guys,

Add me at jdreamer.978! :D
Title: starcraft 2
Post by: duq on Fri, 17 December 2010, 15:34:43
dareUHL #682
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: WhiteRice on Fri, 17 December 2010, 15:35:48
Will anyone be on tonight. I just finished my last final and I might give this game a try again. I have voice coms.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Fri, 17 December 2010, 16:05:03
I'll likely be on most of the day, as per usual. Though staying up for GSL finals mainly and might disappear to see Tron and such.

I've also updated the first post with more User IDs. Anything else you guys think I should start including in there?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: h0tang on Fri, 17 December 2010, 17:54:23
Hey Guys,

I've been lurker on here for a while, but saw this SC2 thread and would love to play with GH guys. I'm pretty noob still, so maybe we can play with AI first haha. Heres my profile http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/2222153/1/hoTang/ I think my plat 3v3 is luck, my two friends pretty much carried me, but I did get silver 3v3 random haha.

Hope to see you guys on battle net.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Fri, 17 December 2010, 21:01:58
Quote from: WhiteRice;264832
Will anyone be on tonight. I just finished my last final and I might give this game a try again. I have voice coms.

I'm on tonight/now, but I can't find your contact info.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: WhiteRice on Fri, 17 December 2010, 21:32:32
Wang 700
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: fssbzz on Fri, 17 December 2010, 22:32:57
gg lol
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: BlueRain on Sat, 18 December 2010, 05:53:35
Blue 517

Just finished watching GSL finals. Not as epic as the previous seasons... or maybe I'm just biased as Zerg.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Sat, 18 December 2010, 06:01:47
I only caught the last game of the finals (yay drinking) but it is nice to see a Protoss finally at this level (bias being Protoss)

As for you Zerg players, I'm surrounded by too many :P
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vld on Sat, 18 December 2010, 07:40:29
You can watch all the games on justin.tv
http://www.justin.tv/tpfour/b/275901816 (http://www.justin.tv/tpfour/b/275901816) +part 2 full with english commentary
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Sun, 19 December 2010, 18:47:03
Will watch a bit.

Played some Random 2v2's. Placed me in Bronze despite my score dominating over everyone else in each game. Kind of goes to show how random team games really.

Probably will be on laddering today (hopefully lol)

And also, if you want me to link your profile to SC2gears or B.net, let me know in the thread and I'll update if you post the link to the profile (can't always find with ID#)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: fssbzz on Mon, 20 December 2010, 15:29:32
add your starcraft 2 profile to your signature.
like my signature!
http://sc2sig.com/
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Mon, 20 December 2010, 23:28:06
Quote from: fssbzz;266356
add your starcraft 2 profile to your signature.
like my signature!
http://sc2sig.com/

Not until I'm Diamond 1v1...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Tue, 21 December 2010, 08:02:58
Quote from: fssbzz;266356
add your starcraft 2 profile to your signature.
like my signature!
http://sc2sig.com/


OCN in your user name, oh my :p

I'll think about adding it but I am pretty stubborn about images in sigs. Moogle's sig reminds me far to much of my old anime forum days back in like '03

In other news, I finally beat my PvZ practice partner in a fairly straight up game. Still a 30 minute 4/5 base game on Steppes, but was a lot of fun and very close. Now I just need a strong PvP partner to play a few games with :p

Oh, and one wanting to get into Diamond, just make Probes and Pylons and keep your money low. And expand. Honeslty, if I don't have my 3rd started before 13 minutes, I double expand. But basically, never stop making workers. If it feels like your money is getting too high, just make more production and/or expand, depending on the situation.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Tue, 21 December 2010, 09:16:06
Everyone says that... do basic macro properly and you will get to Diamond easily.  I don't know if things have changed since those people got Diamond (supposedly it's gotten harder) or if there is exaggeration.

Totally willing to play a game with someone on this concern.  I'm doing the worker/supply thing fine, I really don't think it's all you need to get to Diamond.  Everyone in Gold and up is doing proper macro techniques, from what I see.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: fssbzz on Tue, 21 December 2010, 16:21:29
i set myself play SCII 3 ~4 games a day,
not really into SCII.
just play the game for fun.
and i never even play Starcraft 1 before.
is my friends who force me to buy SCII to play with them lol.
and NOW, catalysm is out, they just left me alone here playing SCII, they are all on WoW.
i don't really know how i get into Gold too.
I know i'm from bronze climb slowly all the way up to gold.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Tue, 21 December 2010, 17:24:18
Quote from: AndrewZorn;266682
Everyone says that... do basic macro properly and you will get to Diamond easily.  I don't know if things have changed since those people got Diamond (supposedly it's gotten harder) or if there is exaggeration.

Totally willing to play a game with someone on this concern.  I'm doing the worker/supply thing fine, I really don't think it's all you need to get to Diamond.  Everyone in Gold and up is doing proper macro techniques, from what I see.


They aren't. I play against Gold players that are friends, etc, and while they aren't terrible about keeping their money low, they just don't expand smoothly or make enough workers and often get supply blocked.

Most players in mid-diamond have terrible macro, honestly.

It is way more than keeping your money low.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Tue, 21 December 2010, 23:31:35
Hey, so Battle.net keeps going down.  If I don't get back on, it's not because I didn't enjoy the conversation, but that I simply gave up.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Tue, 21 December 2010, 23:56:43
Quote from: AndrewZorn;267075
Hey, so Battle.net keeps going down.  If I don't get back on, it's not because I didn't enjoy the conversation, but that I simply gave up.


I can understand that.

As for the replay stuff, I wasn't watching your previous games, I was just looking through the info on the score screen. The economy tab tells how many workers were created over the course of a game. I was just going off that.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: NewbieOneKenobi on Wed, 29 December 2010, 19:08:19
Well, I posted second here but back then I wasn't even ranked. So here's my profile (EU, NewbieOne, 967):

http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1744281/1/NewbieOne/

I'm ranked low silver in solo and it seems to be kinda reliable despite some weirdness about the placement matches (I lost one placement match by unnecessarily building up some defences before banshee-pushing a Protoss player that managed to survive and outcheese me with DT). In the beginning, I won most bronze matchups and lost all silver matchups but now I end up beating the highest ranked silver doods but not getting any gold matchups. I guess this is because I still need much practice of the basics.

I got gold in the 3v3 placement and I kinda consistently stay near the middle (this is probably because team is a bit more forgiving, you don't need to have everything covered and everything does not depend on you all the time). I'd probably move up somewhat if I played team league but right now I'm replaying the campaign missions on hard and focusing on solo if I do play league. I'm a bit torn, however, as to which league I should play.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Fri, 07 January 2011, 23:41:54
So, I just beat Elbowglue's noob ass in 2v2...

EDIT rude, false statement gets no attention?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: duq on Tue, 11 January 2011, 14:43:35
Quote from: NewbieOneKenobi;270467
Well, I posted second here but back then I wasn't even ranked. So here's my profile (EU, NewbieOne, 967):

http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1744281/1/NewbieOne/

I'm ranked low silver in solo and it seems to be kinda reliable despite some weirdness about the placement matches (I lost one placement match by unnecessarily building up some defences before banshee-pushing a Protoss player that managed to survive and outcheese me with DT). In the beginning, I won most bronze matchups and lost all silver matchups but now I end up beating the highest ranked silver doods but not getting any gold matchups. I guess this is because I still need much practice of the basics.

I got gold in the 3v3 placement and I kinda consistently stay near the middle (this is probably because team is a bit more forgiving, you don't need to have everything covered and everything does not depend on you all the time). I'd probably move up somewhat if I played team league but right now I'm replaying the campaign missions on hard and focusing on solo if I do play league. I'm a bit torn, however, as to which league I should play.


Apparently the system takes multiple things into account when considering whom you are going to play in terms of skill. It is rumored that macro stats and your micro/personal physical computer characteristics(APM) are also taken into consideration because they improve your ability to act upon things when making decisions.

The only way to get better is to continue playing and or practicing with people whom are better than you.

We gotta get a GeekHack channel going so we can play with each other considering channels are now available with the new patch.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Tue, 11 January 2011, 15:09:05
Quote from: dareuhl;276920
Apparently the system takes multiple things into account when considering whom you are going to play in terms of skill. It is rumored that macro stats and your micro/personal physical computer characteristics(APM) are also taken into consideration because they improve your ability to act upon things when making decisions.

The only way to get better is to continue playing and or practicing with people whom are better than you.

We gotta get a GeekHack channel going so we can play with each other considering channels are now available with the new patch.


Where did you hear that? There was a big ladder analysis done on Team Liquid where they determined it was a hidden MMR rating for everyone that determined rankings and favored vs unfavored. The analysis was then submitted to Blizzard, who then said "close, but not quite".

A general idea of how you get ranked is that Bnet matches you against people who's MMR ratings are similar to you, then puts you against people with higher MMR ratings if you show a winning ratio. If you lose against the player with the higher MMR rating, they keep you at your level.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Tue, 11 January 2011, 23:32:52
Quote from: JinDesu;276939
Where did you hear that? There was a big ladder analysis done on Team Liquid where they determined it was a hidden MMR rating for everyone that determined rankings and favored vs unfavored. The analysis was then submitted to Blizzard, who then said "close, but not quite".

A general idea of how you get ranked is that Bnet matches you against people who's MMR ratings are similar to you, then puts you against people with higher MMR ratings if you show a winning ratio. If you lose against the player with the higher MMR rating, they keep you at your level.
This is correct, APM etc is not taken into consideration.  Pretty sure I saw Blizzard confirmed that the end result is all that matters.

Now that there are chat channels, yeah, I'll have mine to auto-sign-in to GeekHack... hopefully I'll see some people ever.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Arc'xer on Wed, 12 January 2011, 15:30:23
Quote from: AndrewZorn;277222
This is correct, APM etc is not taken into consideration.  Pretty sure I saw Blizzard confirmed that the end result is all that matters.


SC 2 uses a modified Elo ranking system to determine position.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Wed, 12 January 2011, 16:04:51
Right...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Sun, 16 January 2011, 03:24:59
Quote from: AndrewZorn;277222
This is correct, APM etc is not taken into consideration.  Pretty sure I saw Blizzard confirmed that the end result is all that matters.

Now that there are chat channels, yeah, I'll have mine to auto-sign-in to GeekHack... hopefully I'll see some people ever.


Oh snap. I'll add that to my channels I think.

And yes, nothing in game is taken into consideration for rating, just whether you win the game or not.

And I need to get into Masters League, ughhh.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: duq on Mon, 17 January 2011, 15:56:56
Hopefully will see some people in the geekhack channel soon! Haven't played much lately
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: DanGWanG on Tue, 18 January 2011, 10:39:17
Just found this thread, a few months late!

Wang.187 (noticed someone else had my name too)
Diamond 1v1 #37, 852 points currently
http://sc2ranks.com/us/583589/Wang

I haven't played ladders much lately, just random 4s and 2s with a friend.  The system just gives me too much anxiety, so had to chill on that.  But, I'm always down to practice some friendly 1s or SotIS.

Hit me up!  Add via email (danwang918 at gmail dot com) or character code.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Thu, 20 January 2011, 00:33:22
After this happened, I had to save it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3I4ys8s3qE
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Mon, 24 January 2011, 03:19:24
Quote from: DanGWanG;280387

I haven't played ladders much lately, just random 4s and 2s with a friend.  The system just gives me too much anxiety, so had to chill on that.  But, I'm always down to practice some friendly 1s or SotIS.

Hit me up!  Add via email (danwang918 at gmail dot com) or character code.


I've added your info to the first post.

As for anxiety, I use to have that really badly but I've just found if you play a lot you stop caring about losing as much. At least, that is what I am doing.

Also, would anyone be interested in a replay pack from me? I play Protoss but I tend to mess around a bit and my average game length is over 20 minutes, so rare macro Protoss style :p
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: cometbus on Mon, 31 January 2011, 08:06:50
Andrew - That vid made me laugh, gotta admit. ;)

I'm brand new to the forums(first mech shipped out today, can't wait!), but saw this thread and had to post, since SC2 is a lot of what I've been spending my free time on lately. I'm not too great, currently in Silver league. I've still got some basics to get down, but I'm learning relatively fast.

Used to lan BW with friends a lot in high school, but none of us ever took it very seriously. We mostly played on BGH, and as a result none of us ever got "good." Recently it was the GSL that got me into SC2, I'd just never realized how deep the game could really be, I just love how much there is to learn/improve on. I played Zerg in BW, so naturally had to stick with that in SC2.

Anyway, I'm on the US server, ID is:

cometbus.465

I might try the geekhack channel when I'm on next, I'm usually up for practice/screwin' around games.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Mon, 31 January 2011, 12:32:57
Quote from: AndrewZorn;281579
After this happened, I had to save it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3I4ys8s3qE


I'll go through my replays and show you a player who reacts the complete opposite way (and loses 4 drones to me).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JelinaNU on Mon, 31 January 2011, 19:22:07
I too just discovered this thread. Be prepared for me to rant and rave about the upcoming GSL season once it begins. I'd start a discussion about the recent finals if it hadn't been such a walk-over.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Mon, 31 January 2011, 21:55:59
What is the Geekhack channel? Is it just Geekhack?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: BlueRain on Tue, 01 February 2011, 01:27:46
Quote from: JinDesu;288060
What is the Geekhack channel? Is it just Geekhack?


Think so, though I haven't seen anyone on... ever :(
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Tue, 01 February 2011, 03:09:31
Quote from: BlueRain;288136
Think so, though I haven't seen anyone on... ever :(


I remember to pop in there, but I've been stupid sick lately and just not online much.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Tue, 01 February 2011, 10:52:02
If that's the case, I'll idle in there every night (probably 8pm-midnight eastern). If anyone wants to play or practice, just let me know.

JinDesu.203
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: cometbus on Tue, 01 February 2011, 13:51:18
I'll hop in the channel when I'm on, just lately I've been screwing around with some old friends from FFXI days, doing random custom games.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: shablaGOO on Wed, 02 February 2011, 08:34:58
Hey guys, my character name/number is shablaGOO.870. I'm only Platinum and I haven't been playing that much lately but I plan to get back into it soon, so feel free to add me/message me. I'll definitely check out the geekhack channel as well, despite reports of no one ever being in it lol

edit: Here's my profile link (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1252111/1/shablaGOO/)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Wed, 02 February 2011, 12:59:52
Since there's channel support now, why not join the channel GeekHack? I'll jump on there this evening and see if anyone's around.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Wed, 02 February 2011, 13:07:44
I'll be in the GeekHack channel tonight around 2300UTC (5pm Central Time) if anyone wants to play. I'm getting bored of laddering against anonymous people...

Also, Azuremen, could you update the OP to include Beaver.399 (http://sc2ranks.com/us/1042192/Beaver)? Right now it's just "Beaver" on your list

Quote
Think so, though I haven't seen anyone on... ever :(

I set it to auto-join at startup, so hopefully I'll see more people on there. I'd suggest a vent server, but I fear we won't be able to hear each other over the clattering of our mechanical keyboards :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Sun, 06 February 2011, 03:21:04
Hey guys!

New to Geekhack as a poster, but long-time lurker.

I absolutely LOVE Starcraft 2.  As a result of my playing I have neglected my XBOX 360, went out and bought a Razer DeathAdder mouse with a Steelseries QCK mousepad, and recently placed an order for a tenkeyless Filco Majestouch with cherry browns.

I'm almost always online since I don't have a full-time job yet.  Been playing a lot of customs and ladder games lately, trying to work my way into Masters league.  I'm currently at 2675 Diamond after working my way up from Bronze league back in July.

You can find me online at sawedust.851.

And if you guys need some help with Protoss or Terran mechanics (as those are my two main races, although I've converted to playing Toss full time), hit me up!  I'm always willing to help out a few players while I still have the free time. :)

gg gl hf fp
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Cyanide on Sun, 06 February 2011, 03:32:40
here are my 2 accounts, masters on NA(which i dont really play on much anymore)
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/981081/1/Cyberpsycho/
this is my korean account

http://kr.battle.net/sc2/ko/profile/2741958/1/Cyberpsycho/

only diamond right now, and for those wondering, it is actually really hard to get into higher leagues on the korean servers, masters was super easy for me on the NA servers, its going to take a lot of work to hit it on the korean servers. platinum on the korean servers is like low tier masters on the NA servers. if anyone wants to play, or needs help feel free to pm me here and ill give you my real id ^_^
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Sun, 06 February 2011, 23:43:02
I've updated the first post as best I can. Let me know if I missed anyone, I'm a bit out of it (been very sick lately and on some meds)

Cyanide, what are you character ID numbers? The B.net profile pages don't include those, and I don't know any way to extract them out of it. Also, how did you go about getting a Korean account? I heard it requires you to have a Korean SSN or something insane.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Mon, 07 February 2011, 20:03:21
For the first time ever, I saw someone else in the Geekhack channel.

Beaver! (Daniel Beaver, on this forum.)

Pretty cool, we got to play a couple of PvZs on Xel'Naga and the new GSL map Crossfire.  Really helped me out learning the new maps and practicing my macro and unit compositions against Zerg, which is my weakest matchup.

Looking forward to meeting more of you all on BNet. :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Qwerty on Thu, 10 February 2011, 18:04:17
Mittens 506

Platinum 1v1 zerg player. Always up for team games or whatever. Always willing to help lower level players. Or just willing to practice with others of the same level. :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: elbowglue on Thu, 10 February 2011, 18:33:32
Quote from: AndrewZorn;275011
So, I just beat Elbowglue's noob ass in 2v2...

EDIT rude, false statement gets no attention?


:)  I have been celebrating this whole time nonstop too busy to read on geekhack ;)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: xira on Thu, 10 February 2011, 19:14:58
Let's see more people in the geekhack sc2 chat!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JelinaNU on Thu, 10 February 2011, 19:33:54
I've been very tempted to log on and play a few games again. I haven't played since the beta. In the end ego won out and prevented me from wasting minutes of your collective time.

As for watching SC2, though, I've been watching a ton of coverage of the various team leagues. While some of the builds have been very interesting, I've been a bit disappointed with how one-sided the matches have been. I'm certainly still enjoying the VODs, though.

If by some small chance you haven't seen it, I highly recommend that you watch the ladder match between EGIdra and IMmvp. In a word? Wicked.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: mickd on Thu, 10 February 2011, 19:58:27
For anyone that knows day9, or has watched his dailies, hes trying to win the shorty awards competition, and put in a good word for esports at the acceptance ceremony.

If you would like to vote and support him, go to http://shortyawards.com/category/gaming (http://shortyawards.com/category/gaming), click on his name Sean Plott (currently close behind in 2nd place), and fill in the shortyvoting near the top of the page.

You'll need an active twitter account to vote (as votes are based off tweets), and you will need to put in a reason for it to count. I believe voting closes in a day.

If you haven't heard of him, you should check out some of his vods at http://day9tv.blip.tv/?sort=custom;view=archive;date=;user=day9tv;s=posts;nsfw=dc;page=1 (http://day9tv.blip.tv/?sort=custom;view=archive;date=;user=day9tv;s=posts;nsfw=dc;page=1). He's a analytical starcraft 2 caster.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Thu, 10 February 2011, 23:14:05
Quote from: xira;293131
Let's see more people in the geekhack sc2 chat!


I've only seen two other people in there with me :(  But it's okay, it's great to see someone there so we're not alone. :)

Quote from: JelinaNU;293149
I've been very tempted to log on and play a few games again. I haven't played since the beta. In the end ego won out and prevented me from wasting minutes of your collective time.

As for watching SC2, though, I've been watching a ton of coverage of the various team leagues. While some of the builds have been very interesting, I've been a bit disappointed with how one-sided the matches have been. I'm certainly still enjoying the VODs, though.

If by some small chance you haven't seen it, I highly recommend that you watch the ladder match between EGIdra and IMmvp. In a word? Wicked.


If you thought IdrA vs MVP was good, wait until you get to the finals of the GSTL between Startale (ST) and Incredible Miracle (IM).  There are some very, very SIIIIICK games towards the end with some of the best players in the world (including IMMVP).

It's a definite must watch if you're a fan of SC2.

Quote from: mickd;293156
For anyone that knows day9, or has watched his dailies, hes trying to win the shorty awards competition, and put in a good word for esports at the acceptance ceremony.

If you haven't heard of him, you should check out some of his vods at http://day9tv.blip.tv/?sort=custom;view=archive;date=;user=day9tv;s=posts;nsfw=dc;page=1 (http://day9tv.blip.tv/?sort=custom;view=archive;date=;user=day9tv;s=posts;nsfw=dc;page=1). He's a analytical starcraft 2 caster.


Best caster in the game right now, Day[9]'s videos are great from beginners in Bronze to great players in Masters.

If you're just starting out, or even if you aren't, Daily 132 has to be the best one of the bunch.  The basics of macro.  Just follow those rules and it'll raise your game to a much greater level.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Sat, 12 February 2011, 00:55:29
Updated again. Hopefully I can get some games in this weekend; I've been rather ill and it is has made it is impossible to actually play a game, not to mention the falling asleep on my desk.

And I've got to adjust to a new mouse again. Anyhow, I'll try to loiter in the channel.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Sat, 12 February 2011, 03:39:55
Got to play a couple of games with Qwerty aka Mittens tonight!

Very good Zerg player, we were able to share thoughts and strategies on the Protoss versus Zerg matchup.  It's one of the best in the game I think, but it's confined to a singular matchup in my opinion...

Colossus/Sentry/Stalker versus Roach/Hydra.

There's also a lot of stuff we both have to work on, which includes the basic macro functions.  That will come when we both get used to the customized hotkeys and layout!

Looking forward to meeting more of you guys online!  If you ever need help learning Protoss or Terran, or just need a practice partner I'm almost always on.

gl hf ggs
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JelinaNU on Sat, 12 February 2011, 14:20:30
Quote from: sawedust;293214
If you thought IdrA vs MVP was good, wait until you get to the finals of the GSTL between Startale (ST) and Incredible Miracle (IM).  There are some very, very SIIIIICK games towards the end with some of the best players in the world (including IMMVP).

It's a definite must watch if you're a fan of SC2.


Indeed! I watched them day-of, when I got home from the warehouse. Kudos for the lack of spoilers, too, sir.

I took your advice and watched Daily 132 along with his recent show about hotkeys, mouse movement, and APM. They were great. Then I booted the game and tried to implement what Day mentioned. I was embarrassed at how bad I am. Long, long, long way to go; I'm still sub-bronze.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Sat, 12 February 2011, 16:13:08
Quote from: JelinaNU;294077
Indeed! I watched them day-of, when I got home from the warehouse. Kudos for the lack of spoilers, too, sir.

I took your advice and watched Daily 132 along with his recent show about hotkeys, mouse movement, and APM. They were great. Then I booted the game and tried to implement what Day mentioned. I was embarrassed at how bad I am. Long, long, long way to go; I'm still sub-bronze.

No problem!  I hate it myself when things get spoiled and I haven't watched it yet. (although it's rare for a GSL/GSTL event as I'm almost always on top of that!)

It's just having to get the pylons/probes/units rotation going in your mind throughout the whole game.  Even I have issues with that, and I'm around mid-Diamond level already.

Really solid macro and one proven build order will get people out of Bronze all the way to Platinum.  When I started playing in July I played Terran and just went MMM all the way to Plat level.

Somewhere around July or August I found Day[9] and my play started jumping exponentially after watching some of his casts, especially 132.  Once I started to continually make depots, barracks, and marine/marauder I could just 1a - stim - win.

In a span of one month I went from Bronze to Gold.  Another month later and I was in Platinum!

Once you hit Platinum there's a huge switch in levels of gameplay.  No longer will a single strategy work *all* the time, so you have to learn to adapt in gameplay.  More on that when you get here. :)

I just recently watched Daily 253 (I think?) about warming up your game, learning about location hotkeys, having useful APM, etc.

I think 132 and 253 are *THE* episodes to watch if you want to improve.

And as always if you need help, don't hesitate to contact me online!

sawedust.851

EDIT:
After a laddering session this morning and afternoon, I made it up to 2800 diamond!  On my way to Masters League! :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JelinaNU on Sat, 12 February 2011, 17:58:34
Yeah, I'm still at the stage where I play an incompetent, low-level AI and simply try to properly manage my macro. I start over if I get supply-blocked, forget to expand, or let my minerals excess 1000. *shrug* We'll see. I've been chomping at the bit waiting for Rift to release, but I'm enjoying the challenge this is providing.

Aside: Assembly was weird and the GSL Code A pairings are up.

Edit: Grats on your point gain! I may soon be watching you in the TSL Qualifiers.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Sat, 12 February 2011, 19:12:38
+1 for Day(9), go watch the episodes that sawedust recommends. He understands what is important, and brings a level of enthusiasm to commentating that is unrivaled.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Anteloptics on Sat, 12 February 2011, 19:29:51
Anteloptics.107 - Master league terran.

I don't have a computer to play on when I'm at school though, so I won't be on again until my next break in March (I have pretty much the entire month off).

Protoss imba.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: xira on Sat, 12 February 2011, 20:18:01
Quote from: JelinaNU;294168
Yeah, I'm still at the stage where I play an incompetent, low-level AI and simply try to properly manage my macro. I start over if I get supply-blocked, forget to expand, or let my minerals excess 1000. *shrug* We'll see. I've been chomping at the bit waiting for Rift to release, but I'm enjoying the challenge this is providing.

Aside: Assembly was weird and the GSL Code A pairings are up.

Edit: Grats on your point gain! I may soon be watching you in the TSL Qualifiers.


Makes two of us!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Anteloptics on Sat, 12 February 2011, 20:49:52
By the way, if anybody here would like help with improving their play, I welcome you to go ahead and shoot me a message whenever you see me on Bnet. I have no problem with spending some time discussing strategies, going over replays, or playing some practice games to work on builds and mechanics.

As I said before, I can't play when I'm at school, but I'm going to be home for pretty much the entire month of March and I won't have much to do, so expect me to be on A LOT during that time.

I play on both the NA and EU servers (Anteloptics.107 on both of them).



Also, did/does anybody else here play Broodwar? Just wondering.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Sun, 13 February 2011, 00:30:51
I will have to ask you for some help soon.

How did you get the same .107 suffix on both NA and EU?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Sun, 13 February 2011, 01:33:00
Quote from: Anteloptics;294200
Anteloptics.107 - Master league terran.

I don't have a computer to play on when I'm at school though, so I won't be on again until my next break in March (I have pretty much the entire month off).

Protoss imba.


Protoss not imba, Terran imba (when played right) haha.

Love to play with and/or against you sometime!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Qwerty on Sun, 13 February 2011, 04:00:14
Yeah, I've started hanging around in the chat more and getting into the habit of leaving starcraft in window mode so I can keep an eye on chat will on skype and doing homework... Should stop in, I've seen a few of you in there, now where's the rest? ;)

Btw Sawedust, was fun playing, too bad you don't seem to come on 'till later. We'll have to give that another go, I've been working on my opening a little more, but definitely need to return my mouse to razer >_<
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Sun, 13 February 2011, 05:47:18
Quote from: Anteloptics;294236
By the way, if anybody here would like help with improving their play, I welcome you to go ahead and shoot me a message whenever you see me on Bnet. I have no problem with spending some time discussing strategies, going over replays, or playing some practice games to work on builds and mechanics.

As I said before, I can't play when I'm at school, but I'm going to be home for pretty much the entire month of March and I won't have much to do, so expect me to be on A LOT during that time.

I play on both the NA and EU servers (Anteloptics.107 on both of them).



Also, did/does anybody else here play Broodwar? Just wondering.


I still watch the Korean Broodwar league :) I <3 SKT. I haven't played Broodwar in like a year though.

Anyway, my info:

Silver level terran. I got promoted to silver and basically stopped laddering. I haven't really learned this game and I don't practice often enough due to my job to be a very good player, but sometimes when I play custom games I've beaten platinum and even diamond players.

Mostly I just play SOTIS because it's less stressful for me after work.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Sun, 13 February 2011, 09:08:43
If anyone wants to just practice 1v1, let me know. I'm low-level diamond, but I'll play against anyone (it's good to play both against people who are better and people who are worse).

I'm on in the late afternoon and early evening, usually.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: slueth on Sun, 13 February 2011, 13:59:32
I used to play brood war but my monitor is way too big and stretches the resolution to a horrible skew.  I used to LAN it with my friends and we would play big game hunters.
Starcraft 2 is pretty fun but its not the same as sc1.  sc1 units were more dynamic and was not based entirely on rock paper scissors.
Reavers, lurkers, tanks all required tons of control in sc1.  You had to use a shuttle and drop, fire, then pick up.
Lurkers had to move when they were scanned and use zerglings to aid as fodder.  
There was defilers with swarm so you could eat zerglings and do swarm hopping.

In sc2 there is the colossus, which is just an attack move unit, and tanks have smart fire-they target higher priority things such as infestors and they don't overkill..- I think that killed zealot bombs and I have not seen protoss use zealot bombs against tanks.. Or it might be that there is so much marine usuage against toss that it doesn't really get thought about.

Anyways... /end rant

I got demoted to plat... my connection is pretty bad and drops me every once in a while.  I main zerg but I play random every once in a while.
Username is
Novelty.500
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Sun, 13 February 2011, 15:03:19
Quote from: Qwerty;294319
Btw Sawedust, was fun playing, too bad you don't seem to come on 'till later. We'll have to give that another go, I've been working on my opening a little more, but definitely need to return my mouse to razer >_<


Usually depends on my work, gym, and gf schedule :P  On the weekends I'm on the majority of the day unless I have something planned.  We'll figure something out!

And get that Lachesis back to Razer, go get something that doesn't have the Philips Twin Eye!

(DeathAdder bias ^_^)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Sun, 13 February 2011, 23:26:07
Whoops, forgot to mention, my character id is SpeaKEaSY.238
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Metalix on Mon, 14 February 2011, 03:05:12
Quote from: slueth;294479
I used to play brood war but my monitor is way too big and stretches the resolution to a horrible skew.  I used to LAN it with my friends and we would play big game hunters.
Starcraft 2 is pretty fun but its not the same as sc1.  sc1 units were more dynamic and was not based entirely on rock paper scissors.
Reavers, lurkers, tanks all required tons of control in sc1.  You had to use a shuttle and drop, fire, then pick up.
Lurkers had to move when they were scanned and use zerglings to aid as fodder.  
There was defilers with swarm so you could eat zerglings and do swarm hopping.

In sc2 there is the colossus, which is just an attack move unit, and tanks have smart fire-they target higher priority things such as infestors and they don't overkill..- I think that killed zealot bombs and I have not seen protoss use zealot bombs against tanks.. Or it might be that there is so much marine usuage against toss that it doesn't really get thought about.

Anyways... /end rant

I got demoted to plat... my connection is pretty bad and drops me every once in a while.  I main zerg but I play random every once in a while.
Username is
Novelty.500


Good rant although you must consider bw was not perfect either in the early years. It took a while to evolve into a great dynamic game.. still Sc2 is young and the builds are evolving. Blizzard are active in game balancing.. its not perfect but its very hard to make a balanced game..

Are people here playing in EU? or am I the only EU player here :o ?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Mon, 14 February 2011, 22:18:38
Quote from: slueth;294479
I used to play brood war but my monitor is way too big and stretches the resolution to a horrible skew.  I used to LAN it with my friends and we would play big game hunters.
Starcraft 2 is pretty fun but its not the same as sc1.  sc1 units were more dynamic and was not based entirely on rock paper scissors.

I got demoted to plat... my connection is pretty bad and drops me every once in a while.  I main zerg but I play random every once in a while.
Username is
Novelty.500


Use the iCCup Launcher if you want a windowed mode version of BW that won't skew. It is what people have been doing for ages.

As for Rock, Paper, Scissors... that can maybe apply to PvP at the moment, other wise the game is quite dynamic. Zealot drops don't exist because of smart fire, but because of the fact Marines are actually used in TvP now. The only reason so much unit management was required in BW was because unit AI sucked, not because the units were actually dynamic. Dragoons were god awful. Scarabs could be like gambling. And so on.

If you are in Plat, regardless of connection, you are not in position to be able to discuss the dynamics of the game too much.

Quote from: Metalix;294740

Are people here playing in EU? or am I the only EU player here :o ?


I've been listing the EU players with an EU tag next to their names on the list when they've mentioned it. That is about all I know.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 16 February 2011, 01:12:01
Spam above, get it out of here.

Three of us (Mittens, Wongster, and I) were playing a little bit of SC2 earlier tonight.  Got to play in and watch some awesome matches!  Wongster's a lot better than his gold 1v1 shows, he could probably be in Platinum easily.

Still trying to get used to playing with the Filco, I'm still not used to the layout yet but I absolutely love the feel of it!  Gonna have to spam a lot of custom games over the next week before taking on the ladder again.

In pro SC2 news...

IdrA is moving back to the United States, foregoing the next GSL and living at the EG house in California.

What for?

The North American Starcraft League :D

I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of pros started to come here instead of Korea as the prize money is much more lucrative.  From a financial standpoint it makes a lot of sense because there are so many more foreign tournaments where the prize pool just destroys anything from Korea.

The only thing I see beneficial about playing in Korea is the crazy top-tier talent there as well as the awe and mystique of it.  But if I were a pro gamer, I'd rather worry about getting a better flow of income in tournaments with bigger payouts than just getting my name up there in lights.

Thoughts?

http://nasl.tv
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Wed, 16 February 2011, 07:28:06
er......what's NASL's prize pool?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Wed, 16 February 2011, 08:10:00
Day9's back to the basics video is a mandatory watch for anyone under high Diamond, IMO.  I've seen Rank 1 Master players get supply blocked and such.  Fundamentals are really important.  His new mechanics video is dangerous to watch, IMO, as I don't agree with several things that he says.

As for anyone bronze to low diamond, I highly recommend just practicing one build per matchup continuously while working on the fundamentals -- making workers, spending money well, and scouting.  You'll be advancing in no time at all.  :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Kaz!o on Wed, 16 February 2011, 08:31:27
Crypt, could you tell me with which points you don't agree with Day[9]?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: wongster on Wed, 16 February 2011, 11:54:23
It was awesome playing with sawedust and Mittens (I think they just played easy on me haha)! They're great people and very knowledgeable about the game, as well as being very helpful. I encourage others to join the geekhack channel when they're free!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 16 February 2011, 13:40:19
Quote from: manfaux;296008
er......what's NASL's prize pool?


That's a good question.  It doesn't need to be very much to compete with Korea, and if you include traveling and other expenses a first place prize of at least 5000 USD is already breaking even plus some.  GSL's Code A first prize is a measly 1000 USD with insanely better competition, Code S obviously much more.

We'll just have to find out in a couple days!

Quote from: Crypt;296025
Day9's back to the basics video is a mandatory watch for anyone under high Diamond, IMO.  I've seen Rank 1 Master players get supply blocked and such.  Fundamentals are really important.  His new mechanics video is dangerous to watch, IMO, as I don't agree with several things that he says.

As for anyone bronze to low diamond, I highly recommend just practicing one build per matchup continuously while working on the fundamentals -- making workers, spending money well, and scouting.  You'll be advancing in no time at all.  :)


Yep, 132 is amazing.  I still find myself going back and watching it when I have spare time.  It's that episode and 252 (hotkeys, APM, warming up, etc) that are my go-to episodes.

Quote from: wongster;296165
It was awesome playing with sawedust and Mittens (I think they just played easy on me haha)! They're great people and very knowledgeable about the game, as well as being very helpful. I encourage others to join the geekhack channel when they're free!


We're going to have a rematch soon, you know that right? :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Wed, 16 February 2011, 14:17:46
Quote from: Kaz!o;296034
Crypt, could you tell me with which points you don't agree with Day[9]?
I'm generally a big fan of his, so I'm definitely not biased.  I watched the #252 video on recommendation.  Off of the top of my head:

"don't box single units"  -- even pros and master league players do this.  I believe it's optimal for fast play, since 100% accuracy with the mouse shouldn't be taken for granted.  Even day9 does it in this very same cast.

Location hotkey for the first base -- you already have a control group for your base, so why make things more complex?

he clicks on the mini map then clicks on the main screen to move when clicking on the mini map to move should suffice in most situations.

"always box from top left" -- his reasoning is accuracy.  Accuracy should be traded for speed in most situations.

"edge scrolling is slow/bad"  -- he's demonstrating on default scroll speed.  I believe with fast edge scroll speed, it can be used optimally in many situations rather than mini map clicking.

His section on staring at the mini map is also sorta dangerous because he doesn't show how to balance it with checking mineral/supply cap.  Doing this without good habits for checking min/supply could be disastrous.

His "tapping" section could prove useful for players that don't already tap.  But yea, overall, I felt like there was a lot of misinformation in the cast that also serves to make gamers feel overwhelmed with complexity when these habits shouldn't be followed at all.  These tips were meant for the mainstream to improve, but when even rank 1 masters/pros don't do these things, one has to wonder.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 16 February 2011, 14:54:31
I liked Day[9] a lot better during the broodwar days. You don't hear him cursing or talking about bear semen and having sex with his mom anymore.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Wed, 16 February 2011, 15:06:01
Edge scrolling is just bad. Use Middle Click Drag Scroll, profit immensely.

And we (a group of friends and I) joke that Day9 has become of a parody of himself in many ways. But hey, the guy is getting flown out to cast games of StarCraft, so you can't blame him for cleaning up his act a little. Though some of his BW casts as legendary, namely Chill vs Combat-ex
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 16 February 2011, 15:24:17
@Crypt,

I think we have to look at this specific cast of Day[9] as catering towards the newer players who are around plat/gold level and below.  A lot of the stuff he mentions makes sense for the lower level players and/or new players who have not yet mastered their mouse control.  With that said...

Quote from: Crypt;296232
I'm generally a big fan of his, so I'm definitely not biased.  I watched the #252 video on recommendation.  Off of the top of my head:

"don't box single units"  -- even pros and master league players do this.  I believe it's optimal for fast play, since 100% accuracy with the mouse shouldn't be taken for granted.  Even day9 does it in this very same cast.


I admit that I do box single units, I do it in conjunction with edge scrolling as to move my probe to build a pylon near the ramp right at the start of the game.  Granted it's a small box, just large enough to select the probe and not four-gateway-full of space.

Pretty sure the reason he's mentioning it is for the newer players who have not yet gotten their control down and are making huge ass boxes, which is unnecessary.

It's also used to warm up your unit selection for the inevitable micro needed in battle later in the match.

Quote
Location hotkey for the first base -- you already have a control group for your base, so why make things more complex?


For me, it works immensely as I'm a Toss player.  I'll location hotkey my warpgates for easy access to chronoboost in the event of a 4wg.

But for the most part, my initial Nexus will be on 4 and thus proving your statement correct.  I'll also hotkey a Robo facility on 3 to jump back to my main base and for production, now that 44 automatically jumps me to the expansion.

Quote
"always box from top left" -- his reasoning is accuracy.  Accuracy should be traded for speed in most situations.


I think this one I agree with you.  In fact I've retrained myself to box top right down to bottom left as Tastosis recommended because you end up closer to the minimap.

But he does make a point that it's easier to box from top to bottom than it is from bottom to top.  Same reason why it's easier to attack from top to bottom than from bottom to top.  Mouse control.

Quote
"edge scrolling is slow/bad"  -- he's demonstrating on default scroll speed.  I believe with fast edge scroll speed, it can be used optimally in many situations rather than mini map clicking.


To make a point to the newer players to use their minimap.  I myself use edge scrolling at 100 percent and it works for me.  But I only use it for close locations, like my main base in the first couple minutes of the game, or to micro an army around a certain area.

Quote
His section on staring at the mini map is also sorta dangerous because he doesn't show how to balance it with checking mineral/supply cap.  Doing this without good habits for checking min/supply could be disastrous.


I think he meant to constantly look at the minimap to check, and not literally to stare.  In 132 he always references checking your supply and minerals at the top right, so if used in conjunction with this lesson then a player should always be checking every integral part of the screen.  It's just part of the mental checklist we're trying to ingrain into players and ourselves.

Quote
His "tapping" section could prove useful for players that don't already tap.  But yea, overall, I felt like there was a lot of misinformation in the cast that also serves to make gamers feel overwhelmed with complexity when these habits shouldn't be followed at all.  These tips were meant for the mainstream to improve, but when even rank 1 masters/pros don't do these things, one has to wonder.


I interpreted this as just basic knowledge for the newer and/or less experienced players to improve, but also to keep in mind that nothing is ever finite.  Everyone has their own way of playing and whatever is comfortable should be the way that they play the game.

However Day[9] makes great points throughout that cast and while he may have overexaggerated several points such as the minimap and the mouse control, I think it's just to show that you should train yourself to use everything at your disposal instead of just what's directly in front of you.

The whole mouse control thing is useful when trying to pick out a certain unit (like a stalker) in your army cluster that you're trying to blink back.  When you get used to picking out a single unit (like a probe) in a huge mob at the start of the game, it'll be easier to pick single units throughout the game for micro and what not.

Not trying to be condescending or anything, but I wanted to play Devil's advocate for this part in order to stimulate some discussion and reasoning on why or why not certain things are great.

In the end, we'll all benefit from this sort of discussion and see how we all can learn or improve! :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Wed, 16 February 2011, 15:36:34
**** day9. tastosis is where it's at.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: wongster on Wed, 16 February 2011, 16:00:51
Day9 tries to explain mechanics that would help a majority of SC2 players out there, namely the lower-level/new people. It's too hard to come up with mechanics that will help everyone. I think people have to remember that Day9's advice is just that: advice, tips, and guidelines to help you become a better SC2 player. If it works for you, fantastic! If not, try something else, maybe it will help your game more than his advice. In the end, it only helps you in trying to improve your game, which I'm sure is what all players want to do.

@sawedust: We'll definitely have a rematch dude. I could be the Zerg practice buddy you try rofl-stomping strategies on. You only lost because you're on a new keyboard, not because I'm good :) Oh, and you typed that super long response above just so you could type on your new Filco, huh? Haha
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 16 February 2011, 18:04:31
Quote from: manfaux;296284
**** day9. tastosis is where it's at.


LOL Day[9] would probably ROFLstomp both his brother and Artosis if they ever played.  Plus I though it was epic when the three of them got to cast at Blizzcon.

Quote from: wongster;296298
@sawedust: We'll definitely have a rematch dude. I could be the Zerg practice buddy you try rofl-stomping strategies on. You only lost because you're on a new keyboard, not because I'm good :) Oh, and you typed that super long response above just so you could type on your new Filco, huh? Haha


I think it was a BO loss on my part since I didn't make colossi and/or VRs :/  But you played well regardless!  Can't blame it on the keyboard as it was a mental mistake from not playing as often as I should.

And yes, I made that super long response because I absolutely enjoy typing on this baby :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hate on Wed, 16 February 2011, 19:07:30
Quote from: sawedust;296377
LOL Day[9] would probably ROFLstomp both his brother and Artosis if they ever played.


you have no idea about Artosis.

as for day[9] hes pretty meh for the most of his theorycrafting but he has one of the most annoying fanbase ever (i gues only the huskateers are worse).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Wed, 16 February 2011, 19:16:35
ya im pretty sure Artosis will rofl stomp day9 no problem. He made it into GSL ro64 afterall haha.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 16 February 2011, 19:46:40
We all know D9, if he wanted to take SC2 as seriously as he did BW, would hold his own.   Instead he's busy playing monobattles and fours and Text Twist and whatever else he would usually do.

Yeah, Artosis made RO64 in the first GSL but we all know that was the weakest of the four major GSL tournaments so far.  

But point taken, now that Artosis switched to Toss and D9 looks like he's maining Zerg and all the IMBALANCE web shows that Dan and the Grack love to do every week...

Perhaps Artosis would win.

Meh.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JelinaNU on Wed, 16 February 2011, 21:04:23
Quote from: Azuremen;295199
If you are in Plat, regardless of connection, you are not in position to be able to discuss the dynamics of the game too much


I feel the need to point out that this quite an unsubstantiated logical leap -- and likely a fallacy. I agree that being a great analyst would require a level of game knowledge that included experiential nuances of the game. That does not, however, mean that one without said knowledge couldn't make a cogent point and/or argument. While I, for example, may not be able to speak to the specific timings of select circumstance-specific openings/builds/pushes with any authority, I am beyond capable of parsing recent "standard" lines of play (read: those builds and styles composing the so-called metagame) and asking why players take them as a given. Reapers are trash? Why? These are the types of questions that many of the players above Plat forget to ask once they reach that level; their play becomes reactive mimicry.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Thu, 17 February 2011, 06:05:43
"I interpreted this as just basic knowledge for the newer and/or less experienced players to improve, but also to keep in mind that nothing is ever finite. Everyone has their own way of playing and whatever is comfortable should be the way that they play the game."

Indeed, I believe his videos are mostly aimed at beginner-mid level.  The problem is I believe those players take his words as gospel.  Day9 is showing his mechanics as "how to do things right" instead of "how Day9 (supposedly) likes to do things."

Let me see if I can address some points:

Yes, I agree that clicking units is a good warmup/calibration technique.  He does not mention this point, however, and just makes a blanket statement that boxing individual units should not be done.

Edge scrolling -- I use the mini map often.  Edge scrolling is good in more cases than he shows due to his scroll speed setting, though.  And, he doesn't mention that the scroll speed should be increased.  Having beginners turn up their edge scroll speed is probably more useful than telling them that edge scrolling is bad.

Looking at mini map -- Yes, if they watched #132, they would find a way to balance these things on their own.  However, I don't expect beginners to have watched the past ~120 dailies.

Overall combination of misinformation and needlessly added complexity is dangerous for those that take his words at face value.  Sure, there is useful information in there, but it's difficult for someone without experience to be critical of it on his own.

No worries about offending.  :)  I never take anything personally, especially not this type of discussion.

I've probably seen 100+ dailies, and I've only disagreed with him on one other point aside from these videos.  He's a big proponent on making exactly the # of structures that you can support with the current economy.  I believe that's a mistake, as having extra production options can allow you to adjust your unit mix to do better against your opponent.  In the GSTL, I believe a Protoss had 6 unit production buildings on one base.  Another prime example is when a Terran has double starport vs. Protoss.  He's not continually using them, but he will use both when he sees that he needs a large amount of vikings.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Thu, 17 February 2011, 06:32:43
(Day[9] fan-boy, have watched his dailies since the beginning)

His general points are sound and non-obvious to newer and medium-ranked players. Starcraft is an interesting case among games, because the fundamental mechanics are so much more complex than is general, and it is so unforgiving. For a very good player, Day[9] probably isn't the best resource. But for the community as a whole, he can only help.

Say what you will about his playing ability, but as a caster for games, I think he is fabulous. His speaking abilities are refined, and he brings an enthusiasm to the games which many other casters lack. His work at MLG and Dreamhack, for example, greatly enhanced the experience. It seems obvious that he is going to follow the path of Artosis and his brother, and he'll do a damn good job at it.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Thu, 17 February 2011, 14:23:13
@Crypt,

Glad that we've come across a mutual understanding!  Day[9] has excellent points, but as you've mentioned in can be hard to distinguish exactly what, where, when, and how to do something he says.  For beginners and/or hardcore fanboys who take his advice word-for-word, they are going to encounter some issues as a literal understanding of Day[9]'s suggestions will hinder them.

But if they were to take them as ideas to implement and be aware of, then they should improve their game very fast as those things he's mentioned are essentially the basics of SC2 that all players should know.

Quote from: Crypt;296616
I've probably seen 100+ dailies, and I've only disagreed with him on one other point aside from these videos.  He's a big proponent on making exactly the # of structures that you can support with the current economy.  I believe that's a mistake, as having extra production options can allow you to adjust your unit mix to do better against your opponent.  In the GSTL, I believe a Protoss had 6 unit production buildings on one base.  Another prime example is when a Terran has double starport vs. Protoss.  He's not continually using them, but he will use both when he sees that he needs a large amount of vikings.


I kind of agree with D9 on that point.  I think his point with not creating additional structures (aimed towards newer players) is to make sure you can constantly produce out of all your buildings in order to build up a sizable army.  Just a basic macro lesson for the new guys.  Building an extra gateway or two (when you already have three or four up and no expansion) is another two or three zealots that can be used in your army.

As we gain a better understanding of the game when moving up through the ranks, from experience we realize how much structures we can support according to which unit composition we're looking to create.

For beginners who only know MMM or 4gate (which are still legit strategies at higher levels!), creating too many unit producing structures actually hinders them in the early game where they tend to stick on one base for the majority of the game.  I think this was the point that Day[9] was trying to make.

Quote from: Daniel Beaver;296623
Say what you will about his playing ability, but as a caster for games, I think he is fabulous. His speaking abilities are refined, and he brings an enthusiasm to the games which many other casters lack. His work at MLG and Dreamhack, for example, greatly enhanced the experience. It seems obvious that he is going to follow the path of Artosis and his brother, and he'll do a damn good job at it.


I think he's the best caster in the game when it comes to blending enthusiasm, entertainment, and knowledge.

I love all the people who hate on his dailies because they're a hour long and that's too long, and instead choose to watch pro replays casted by Husky instead.  Nothing against Husky, I watched a lot of his videos too when I started playing but I quickly learned that the analysis and insight that D9 brings into his casts are unparalleled by anyone else out there.

When Daystosis casted at Blizzcon, I thought that was one of the best casting teams that could ever be assembled.  If I had to pick between D9 and Tastosis though, I'd go with D9 as most of the time he seems more interested and enthusiastic about the game at hand.

How many times have we seen Tastosis disinterested in a game because it features a player they don't like or biased against in the GSL, and proceed to harass that player and be unprofessional about it?

On a side note, I think it's a little disappointing what's going on between the professional gamers, TL, and TotalBiscuit.  I love that guy's casts as he finds a way to make even the most mundane games seem exciting (watch him cast a game of Aiur Chef near the part where he goes 110 percent).

To hear the news that TB is cutting back on casting, or maybe not even casting at all, is disappointing for a viewer like me who enjoys what he brings to the table.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Jokah on Thu, 17 February 2011, 16:54:56
Awesome thread. Awesome game.

My love of starcraft and need for a new keyboard brought me to geekhack. Thanks to geekhack I have just purchased my first mechanical keyboard.

Gaming doesn't get much better than this.

See you on the geekhack chat channel soon.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Thu, 17 February 2011, 18:11:26
Gah, grad school is not conducive to Starcraft play. I might have to switch back to something dumber. League of Legends time, woo!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Thu, 17 February 2011, 19:02:56
Just jumping in with some of my thoughts as well

Quote
"don't box single units"  -- even pros and master league players do this.  I believe it's optimal for fast play, since 100% accuracy with the mouse shouldn't be taken for granted.  Even day9 does it in this very same cast.


I personally am trying to use single clicks more often now; not so that I will always single click my units instead of boxing, but so that I train my mouse accuracy to the point where I know I will have the mouse over the unit immediately when I need to.

Quote
Location hotkey for the first base -- you already have a control group for your base, so why make things more complex?


I think this was more tied to the "probe click distant location to build, F2 to swap screens back without losing probe control, shift right-click on mineral patchs." I'm practicing this as well, and I will agree that it is a lot quicker and feels a lot smoother than scrolling or trying to click on the minimap. I even suggest constantly refreshing your shift+f4 (I redid my hotkeys) location to wherever you need (secondary army, new base, outside pylons).

Quote
he clicks on the mini map then clicks on the main screen to move when clicking on the mini map to move should suffice in most situations.


I think the goal is tell us to strive for perfection. Unless you are that good, right clicking on the minimap is not as accurate as right clicking on the screen.

Quote
"always box from top left" -- his reasoning is accuracy.  Accuracy should be traded for speed in most situations.


I don't agree with accuracy should be traded with speed. No matter how fast I box my units, if I can't box the right amount of units, I have failed.

Quote
"edge scrolling is slow/bad"  -- he's demonstrating on default scroll speed.  I believe with fast edge scroll speed, it can be used optimally in many situations rather than mini map clicking.


A few people go with the middle mouse click scroll - I haven't gotten the hang of that and pretty much edge scroll.

Quote
His section on staring at the mini map is also sorta dangerous because he doesn't show how to balance it with checking mineral/supply cap.  Doing this without good habits for checking min/supply could be disastrous.


I don't know if it's possible to show his eye movements, even when he's trying to simulate it with the mouse. Generally though, supply cap should be an instinct. I know when I need supply; it's not just because I look at the number up there. Even if I lose units, I only need to look once to judge where I am and then to start counting supply from my production.

Minerals should also be the same; my production cycles should keep my minerals at a minimum unless I am trying to build more buildings. It should always be an instinct with occasional glances to keep me in reality.

Quote
His "tapping" section could prove useful for players that don't already tap.


It definitely does - I've been teaching my friend to play SC2, and I showed him that cast and he is trying to learn how to use the tap method (slow first, then fast). Instead of randomly spamming hotkeys, the tap method is basically the same motions but with actual information.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Thu, 17 February 2011, 19:03:48
Quote from: sawedust;296818

How many times have we seen Tastosis disinterested in a game because it features a player they don't like or biased against in the GSL, and proceed to harass that player and be unprofessional about it?


you just don't get Tastosis do you.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Thu, 17 February 2011, 19:11:41
Quote from: JinDesu;296961
Just jumping in with some of my thoughts as well



I personally am trying to use single clicks more often now; not so that I will always single click my units instead of boxing, but so that I train my mouse accuracy to the point where I know I will have the mouse over the unit immediately when I need to.



I think this was more tied to the "probe click distant location to build, F2 to swap screens back without losing probe control, shift right-click on mineral patchs." I'm practicing this as well, and I will agree that it is a lot quicker and feels a lot smoother than scrolling or trying to click on the minimap. I even suggest constantly refreshing your shift+f4 (I redid my hotkeys) location to wherever you need (secondary army, new base, outside pylons).



I think the goal is tell us to strive for perfection. Unless you are that good, right clicking on the minimap is not as accurate as right clicking on the screen.



I don't agree with accuracy should be traded with speed. No matter how fast I box my units, if I can't box the right amount of units, I have failed.



A few people go with the middle mouse click scroll - I haven't gotten the hang of that and pretty much edge scroll.



I don't know if it's possible to show his eye movements, even when he's trying to simulate it with the mouse. Generally though, supply cap should be an instinct. I know when I need supply; it's not just because I look at the number up there. Even if I lose units, I only need to look once to judge where I am and then to start counting supply from my production.

Minerals should also be the same; my production cycles should keep my minerals at a minimum unless I am trying to build more buildings. It should always be an instinct with occasional glances to keep me in reality.



It definitely does - I've been teaching my friend to play SC2, and I showed him that cast and he is trying to learn how to use the tap method (slow first, then fast). Instead of randomly spamming hotkeys, the tap method is basically the same motions but with actual information.



agree with most things you said there,

Middle click drag scroll is straight up retarded, I watch tons of pro streams and no one does it, I have no idea why someone would suggest drag scroll under any circumstances - it takes your finger away from left/right click and that's extremely dangerous. I've even seen pros use the arrow key cluster to scroll, but NEVER a drag scroll.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Thu, 17 February 2011, 20:21:51
Quote from: manfaux;296964
agree with most things you said there,

Middle click drag scroll is straight up retarded, I watch tons of pro streams and no one does it, I have no idea why someone would suggest drag scroll under any circumstances - it takes your finger away from left/right click and that's extremely dangerous. I've even seen pros use the arrow key cluster to scroll, but NEVER a drag scroll.


I think Boxer still uses the arrow cluster for scrolling; it takes quite a bit of coordination to even use it. I don't really know how detrimental the drag scroll is because I can't get used to it. It may be better for some people, and probably worse for a lotta other people.

The main benefit for the drag scroll is that the scroll is instantaneous. If you have high mouse sensitivity and high mouse scroll speed, edge scrolling might be just as fast, but it is also a little less accurate.

But again, I just use edge scrolling after 8 years of using edge scrolling in all my RTS'
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Thu, 17 February 2011, 21:59:19
I still use classic keyboard layout even though everyone says I'm retarded for not using Grid.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Thu, 17 February 2011, 22:23:42
@Jokah,

Awesome!  That's how I found my way here as well.  You're going to love your mechanical keyboard.  What did you get?

@Beaver,

Nah, you can do it haha.  Just need to get that school stuff done quicker so you have more time to enjoy with us!

@manfaux,

Please enlighten me then. :)

@JinDesu,

I think those who use the drag scroll are used to doing it when casting games.  IIRC they mentioned something about it during a GSL cast in between matches about optimal ways of scrolling around a screen.  I use edge scrolling anyway.

@speakeasy,

With the customizable hotkeys you can set it up so it's like a grid layout!  That's what I did with mine.  Having been so used to A-moving in my casual WC3 days I'd find it hard to switch to T-move.

Swapped all my hotkeys so that the furthest right on the keyboard I'd have to press would be the Y key to build a Cybernetics Core.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Konrad on Thu, 17 February 2011, 23:38:44
Quote from: speakeasy;297041
I still use classic keyboard layout even though everyone says I'm retarded for not using Grid.
I'm a SC2 noob and definitely nowhere near any kind of professional competition.  I know SC2 well enough for typical multiplayer, I suppose, but most of the meta-analysis of meta-analysis in this thread confuses the hell outta me, lol.
 
Is "Grid" some kind of SC2-optimized keyboard layout?  Where can I learn about it?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Fri, 18 February 2011, 01:33:05
Quote from: Konrad;297070
I'm a SC2 noob and definitely nowhere near any kind of professional competition.  I know SC2 well enough for typical multiplayer, I suppose, but most of the meta-analysis of meta-analysis in this thread confuses the hell outta me, lol.
 
Is "Grid" some kind of SC2-optimized keyboard layout?  Where can I learn about it?

Welcome to the thread! :D  I'm sure as you progress in your SC2 game you will come to learn and understand the rants and strategies we've been discussing in the past couple of pages.

Grid is a layout that binds all command to the keyboard like this:

Example 1 (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/190/gridf.jpg/)
Example 2 (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/169/grid2z.jpg/)

Supposedly it makes playing and learning SC2 a lot easier as you don't have to worry about learning different hotkeys for each race, just understanding the grid layout as a whole.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Fri, 18 February 2011, 03:02:29
Quote from: Konrad;297070
I'm a SC2 noob and definitely nowhere near any kind of professional competition.  I know SC2 well enough for typical multiplayer, I suppose, but most of the meta-analysis of meta-analysis in this thread confuses the hell outta me, lol.
 
Is "Grid" some kind of SC2-optimized keyboard layout?  Where can I learn about it?


Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Fri, 18 February 2011, 06:24:51
Quote from: speakeasy;297041
I still use classic keyboard layout even though everyone says I'm retarded for not using Grid.


You are :)

A lot of pros still use the old layout, since their muscle memory is stubborn. I forced myself to change to grid layout back in WC3 days (customkeys.txt), and am glad I did. It also helps a lot for custom games, since you don't have to learn hotkeys for every tower defense games. There are zero downsides, as far as I'm concerned.

It's a ***** to change layouts, though. Not unlike switching from QWERTY to DVORAK.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Jokah on Fri, 18 February 2011, 06:34:59
@sawedust. I went for the ducky 1008 from pchome. Hasn't arrived yet but I'll be sure to give my views once it aririves.

Shame I won't be able to have a game with anyone here. I didn't think of this when I initially posted but I'm on EU server and I presume mist people here will be US.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Fri, 18 February 2011, 13:46:34
Quote from: Daniel Beaver;297145
You are :)

A lot of pros still use the old layout, since their muscle memory is stubborn. I forced myself to change to grid layout back in WC3 days (customkeys.txt), and am glad I did. It also helps a lot for custom games, since you don't have to learn hotkeys for every tower defense games. There are zero downsides, as far as I'm concerned.

It's a ***** to change layouts, though. Not unlike switching from QWERTY to DVORAK.


Pssssh, Grid is for noobs :P

It's funny, cause when I was first learning Broodwar, I was complaining about the key layout and wondering why blizzard didn't put all the hotkeys all on the right side. I'd probably take the time to retrain my fingers when I decide to learn zerg and toss in this game, but for now I'd rather use my free hours to have fun and actually play the game. I don't think it's that bad since this new game doesn't require nearly as much APM as broodwar.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: guilleguillaume on Fri, 18 February 2011, 14:28:21
I tried GRID for first time...and it's a lot easier LOL

I think I should adapt to it.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Fri, 18 February 2011, 14:50:13
Quote from: JelinaNU;296480
I feel the need to point out that this quite an unsubstantiated logical leap -- and likely a fallacy. I agree that being a great analyst would require a level of game knowledge that included experiential nuances of the game. That does not, however, mean that one without said knowledge couldn't make a cogent point and/or argument. While I, for example, may not be able to speak to the specific timings of select circumstance-specific openings/builds/pushes with any authority, I am beyond capable of parsing recent "standard" lines of play (read: those builds and styles composing the so-called metagame) and asking why players take them as a given. Reapers are trash? Why? These are the types of questions that many of the players above Plat forget to ask once they reach that level; their play becomes reactive mimicry.

I would disagree, being well above Plat in terms of skill. Most players beyond the "I have 2 or 3 builds I do every game" have a very solid understanding of why this or that works. They also have the mechanics to back their opinion, where as lower level players will complain about imbalance in units while they really are just reacting poorly and having poor composistion - ala a Protoss that mostly makes Stalkers against a T because he has concluded Zealots don't anything because of kiting.

Though I've seen Plat players with great mechanics and just terrible decision making and control.

But as a general rule of thumb, Plat players are missing something that Diamond and Master players have, and it isn't necessarily experience or raw mechanics. And thus their input on how the game works isn't as well rounded or thought out. It is similar to when Gold players attempt to argue this or that based on their experience.

Quote from: manfaux;296964
agree with most things you said there,

Middle click drag scroll is straight up retarded, I watch tons of pro streams and no one does it, I have no idea why someone would suggest drag scroll under any circumstances - it takes your finger away from left/right click and that's extremely dangerous. I've even seen pros use the arrow key cluster to scroll, but NEVER a drag scroll.

HuK still puts his Nexus on 0 because P use to be for Probe.

Most of the things pros do are old habits from BW, not because it is the most optimal way to anything. Same why many use classic hot keys instead of Grid, and so on.

I use Drag Scroll almost exclusively. It is faster than moving to edge scroll, more precise, lets me move outside of 8 degrees of motion, and I can max it and get across smaller maps without lifting my mouse. Further, I can instantly adjust what I am looking at without having to move my cursor at all. Edge scroll is cumbersome in my opinion, and I know several other capable players that agree.

As for grid, I'd love to adjust to it but I learned almost all the hot keys for every race back in the beta before they introduced the options, so the muscle memory is just heavily ingrained. Tis what happens when you play Random for months.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: wongster on Fri, 18 February 2011, 15:08:11
I think what most people who are at a beginner level tend to miss is that tips/guidelines/Day9 dailies/pro techniques are there as options for a player to try out. You need to use those options to find something that works for you and makes you a better player. Sure there are basic mechanics people need to know in order to play effectively, but in the end you need to fine-tune the options given to you to suit how you play. Like Azuremen said, some pros use techniques from BW that they're most comfortable with, not necessarily because it's the best way to play.

Good, constructive discussion here by the way. Keep it up Geekhackers!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Fri, 18 February 2011, 15:09:45
lol, I use 0 for my nexus. Anytime I need to make a probe, I have to do a nice stretch from 0 to e.

The reason I do it is because my hotkeys (and I'm forcing myself to keep to these hotkeys) are:

1,2,3 - Army/subarmies/casters
4 - Any new unit that I have to control separately for a reason/random pylon in the middle of nowhere
5 - Robotics/Stargate
6 - Research building
7,8 - Observers
9 - Probe
0 - Nexus

So even though it's inconvenient to have Nexus at 0, I feel that I might as well get used to spanning the whole keyboard.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Fri, 18 February 2011, 15:25:03
Quote from: JinDesu;297367
lol, I use 0 for my nexus. Anytime I need to make a probe, I have to do a nice stretch from 0 to e.

The reason I do it is because my hotkeys (and I'm forcing myself to keep to these hotkeys) are:

1,2,3 - Army/subarmies/casters
4 - Any new unit that I have to control separately for a reason/random pylon in the middle of nowhere
5 - Robotics/Stargate
6 - Research building
7,8 - Observers
9 - Probe
0 - Nexus

So even though it's inconvenient to have Nexus at 0, I feel that I might as well get used to spanning the whole keyboard.


No need to hotkey the research buildings, leave 6 for your Nexus/CC is much better.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Fri, 18 February 2011, 15:29:55
Quote from: manfaux;297373
No need to hotkey the research buildings, leave 6 for your Nexus/CC is much better.


I prefer to have it hotkeyed so I can check on the progress; chronoboost really throws off my ability to judge the time correctly.

Also, it's nice to have all my research buildings on a hotkey so I don't actually have to run around the base clicking on them to get the research I want.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Fri, 18 February 2011, 15:36:07
Quote from: Azuremen;297355

HuK still puts his Nexus on 0 because P use to be for Probe.

Most of the things pros do are old habits from BW, not because it is the most optimal way to anything. Same why many use classic hot keys instead of Grid, and so on.

I use Drag Scroll almost exclusively. It is faster than moving to edge scroll, more precise, lets me move outside of 8 degrees of motion, and I can max it and get across smaller maps without lifting my mouse. Further, I can instantly adjust what I am looking at without having to move my cursor at all. Edge scroll is cumbersome in my opinion, and I know several other capable players that agree.


Broodwar had drag scroll, no one used it.

Normal scheme and grid are purely preference, Grid setup is good at times but extremely prone to mistyping.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Fri, 18 February 2011, 15:37:06
Quote from: JinDesu;297380
I prefer to have it hotkeyed so I can check on the progress; chronoboost really throws off my ability to judge the time correctly.

Also, it's nice to have all my research buildings on a hotkey so I don't actually have to run around the base clicking on them to get the research I want.


there is a progress bar right on the building dude
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Fri, 18 February 2011, 15:43:23
Quote from: manfaux;297386
there is a progress bar right on the building dude


Well for one thing, if I'm used to judging the research completion by the time it took, then I wasn't looking at the building. I like to check on my research while I am not looking at my base.

Just like how I like to check on my production in my robobays/stargates while I am not looking at my base.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Fri, 18 February 2011, 15:49:39
@guilleguillaume,
If grid works out best for you, then by all means go for it!  If you're just starting off with SC2, even better!  That way you'll already have the layouts ingrained starting out.

For players like Azuremen and I who have gotten used to playing on default for so long it would take a lot of effort to switch rather than keep something that we've been using for so long.

Quote from: Azuremen;297355
Most players beyond the "I have 2 or 3 builds I do every game" have a very solid understanding of why this or that works. They also have the mechanics to back their opinion, where as lower level players will complain about imbalance in units while they really are just reacting poorly and having poor composition.

But as a general rule of thumb, Plat players are missing something that Diamond and Master players have, and it isn't necessarily experience or raw mechanics. And thus their input on how the game works isn't as well rounded or thought out. It is similar to when Gold players attempt to argue this or that based on their experience.


For the majority of players in the lower leagues who do not understand the basic concepts of the game, I believe this to be true.  You can find these guys blabbing on the Blizzard forums about Protoss imba, Terran imba, and what not.

But given enough research, gameplay, and devotion to learning about the game you can come up with topics about the game itself to discuss freely without being ridiculed and/or sternly lectured from the higher level players.

The way I see it, the jump from bronze/silver/gold to platinum is merely learning a build order, sticking to it, and macroing well to the point where your army is bigger than his army.  (A poster on Reddit proved that by mere macro only (one huge ass ball of Blink Stalkers, IIRC) you can go from Bronze to Master from just constantly making pylons, probes, and units.)

When you get to platinum, that's when having game sense starts to kick in and you're forced to learn to change and adapt on the fly.  You start learning about units, timings, counters, scouting for tips as to what your opponent might tech to, etc. It's no longer about one unit versus one unit, it's about action and reaction along with who has the better game mechanics.

Once a basic understanding of all of that is done is right about the time you hit Diamond league.  You start to know and understand the game and can do it decently.

Just my opinion. :)

Quote from: JinDesu;297367
lol, I use 0 for my nexus. Anytime I need to make a probe, I have to do a nice stretch from 0 to e.

The reason I do it is because my hotkeys (and I'm forcing myself to keep to these hotkeys) are:

1,2,3 - Army/subarmies/casters
4 - Any new unit that I have to control separately for a reason/random pylon in the middle of nowhere
5 - Robotics/Stargate
6 - Research building
7,8 - Observers
9 - Probe
0 - Nexus

So even though it's inconvenient to have Nexus at 0, I feel that I might as well get used to spanning the whole keyboard.


The cool thing about customizable hotkeys is you can set things up to your preference!  I prefer to keep everything on the left side of my keyboard so that I don't have to move my fingers very far.  Very easy to use for me :)

And if anyone cares...
1 Main army
2 Scout/observer/secondary army
3 Robo
4 Nexus
5 Stargate
6 Forge
7-0 Whatever is needed

F1 Main base/warpgates
F2 Forward pylon/second base
F3 Forward pylon/third base
F4 Forward pylon
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Fri, 18 February 2011, 15:54:02
Quote from: JinDesu;297391
Well for one thing, if I'm used to judging the research completion by the time it took, then I wasn't looking at the building. I like to check on my research while I am not looking at my base.

Just like how I like to check on my production in my robobays/stargates while I am not looking at my base.


I mapped 7,8,9 and 0 to F2~F5, you might want to try that, reaching for those numbers is such a PITA!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Fri, 18 February 2011, 15:55:07
I agree that the customizable hotkeys really assist in setting up the hotkeys, but I am so used to the standard keys in the beta, and I set up the control groups back then to maximize the information I can get and allow me to quickly control my army and production (1-6) that I just can't change it. I even use the same sorta control groups when I offrace as zerg and terran lol, it's even harder to reach S from 0 than it is to hit E from 0.

Curse you, muscle memory!

Quote from: manfaux;297399
I mapped 7,8,9 and 0 to F2~F5, you might want to try that, reaching for those numbers is such a PITA!

I agree it's a PITA, but I am so used to it because I had it from Beta. I use the Fkeys now for locations though, because that's a BW memory for me.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Fri, 18 February 2011, 16:03:45
Quote from: sawedust;297397

And if anyone cares...
1 Main army
2 Scout/observer/secondary army
3 Robo
4 Nexus
5 Stargate
6 Forge
7-0 Whatever is needed

F1 Main base/warpgates
F2 Forward pylon/second base
F3 Forward pylon/third base
F4 Forward pylon


As you aren't likely to constantly produce units out of BOTH robo and stargate, it's better to leave one hotkey out for you combating units, I have 1~4 all for army and it's not nearly enough.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Fri, 18 February 2011, 16:11:11
I also like to tab between the stargate and robo if I actually have both out.

It's different with terran though, because I definitely need my starports and factories on different hotkeys, especially because of the addons.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: wongster on Fri, 18 February 2011, 16:18:30
I'm trying to get used to hotkeying research buildings. I think it's a more efficient way to check the progress of upgrades and not have idle research buildings.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Fri, 18 February 2011, 16:18:41
Quote from: JinDesu;297417
I also like to tab between the stargate and robo if I actually have both out.

It's different with terran though, because I definitely need my starports and factories on different hotkeys, especially because of the addons.


tab works. I play terran and I dont hotkey either factory or starport, just 4 for all my rax and that's it, every other control group is all armies.

If you look closely enough, there are still plenty of unused hotkeys to be customized, like Tilde and space. I use Tilde for Patrolling and Space for jumping between bases(what backspace did)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Fri, 18 February 2011, 16:21:44
i keep space for "ACTION IS HAPPENING HERE", but i agree with the tilde - i'll check through all the empty hotkeys to see what i can do with them
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Fri, 18 February 2011, 16:26:36
Quote from: manfaux;297384
Broodwar had drag scroll, no one used it.

Normal scheme and grid are purely preference, Grid setup is good at times but extremely prone to mistyping.


Yes and it was implemented so poorly it is no wonder no one used it. I can't use drag scroll in BW just because of how it works in BW. In SC2 is it much smoother and easier to control where it is going.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Fri, 18 February 2011, 17:10:46
Whoa, this thread really exploded with a lot of different topics.  Go SC2!  :)

"I don't agree with accuracy should be traded with speed. No matter how fast I box my units, if I can't box the right amount of units, I have failed."

What I meant is that you can trade pixel accuracy for speed without boxing the wrong amount of units.  For example, making a huge box for one unit is fine if there are no other units around *and* it allows you to do it faster than any other technique.

Re: Edge Scrolling:

The problem for me is let's say my mouse is at the center of the mousepad.  If I drag scroll to the right, my mouse will be to the right of my mousepad, but my cursor will still be in the center of the screen.  I'd have to lift up my mouse and plant it back in the middle of the screen.  I really try to avoid mouse lifting at all costs with optical/laser mice.  I like the feeling of knowing that when my mouse is physically centered, the cursor is always correspondingly centered on the screen.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Konrad on Fri, 18 February 2011, 18:47:46
Any thoughts about mapping Grid on the numpad?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Fri, 18 February 2011, 19:53:08
Quote from: Konrad;297510
Any thoughts about mapping Grid on the numpad?


You'd have to move your hand for your control groups then.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JelinaNU on Fri, 18 February 2011, 20:03:24
A quick heads-up: the FXOpen Invitational just went live. The brackets show the potential for some amazing games. I'm excited to sit down with coffee and pizza  and watch some high-level Starcraft 2!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Fri, 18 February 2011, 22:55:23
Quote from: manfaux;297411
As you aren't likely to constantly produce units out of BOTH robo and stargate, it's better to leave one hotkey out for you combating units, I have 1~4 all for army and it's not nearly enough.


Quote from: JinDesu;297417
I also like to tab between the stargate and robo if I actually have both out.

It's different with terran though, because I definitely need my starports and factories on different hotkeys, especially because of the addons.


I usually have one or the other on hotkey 3 when I'm operating out of one base.  I don't usually get the other facility until I'm operating off of two bases, and that is where the layouts are fine for me as I'll have enough economy to keep pushing units out of all production facilities.

It's a habit from playing Terran so long since release where like JinDesu, I had 3/5/6 set up for Rax/Factory/Starport.

Quote from: wongster;297419
I'm trying to get used to hotkeying research buildings. I think it's a more efficient way to check the progress of upgrades and not have idle research buildings.


It is!  Good habit to have.  Plus when something is finished reseaching, you can just press a hotkey and start upgrading something else without having to head back to your base. :)

Quote from: manfaux;297420
tab works. I play terran and I dont hotkey either factory or starport, just 4 for all my rax and that's it, every other control group is all armies.

If you look closely enough, there are still plenty of unused hotkeys to be customized, like Tilde and space. I use Tilde for Patrolling and Space for jumping between bases(what backspace did)


RE: Army control, I use tab to go in between the deathball units.  As the sentries are usually the only ones with abilities it's pretty easy to shield up or forcefield when needed.  If I have to blink stalkers back, I can do that either manually or with tab.  Old habits from WC3.

I remapped tilde to idle worker as I moved my location hotkeys to F1-F4.  Space, I kept as last action.  My bases are on F1-F3 so I use that instead to cycle through.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Sun, 20 February 2011, 21:23:13
Just a heads up!

GSL starts again tonight!  We start with the Code A RO32 Day 1.  2300 HST start time!

Losira (Z) vs. LegalMind (P)
August (T) vs. Loner (T)
Curious (Z) vs. HuK (P)
Posh (Z) vs. ButterflyEffect (T)

Let's hope we see some of the amazing gameplay shown in the GSTL.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JelinaNU on Sun, 20 February 2011, 22:42:30
Quote from: sawedust;298570
Just a heads up! GSL starts again tonight!  We start with the Code A RO32 Day 1.  2300 HST start time!

Hype! I'm ready to see HuK and the others hwaiting. I get up for work at 5am, though, so I won't be able to watch the matches until I get home. The Bo7 showmatch between Idra and Jinro starts at 5pm EST, too. So much goodness...

Are we observing the three-day rule regarding match spoilers in this thread?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Sun, 20 February 2011, 23:01:31
can't wait to see HuK play, hope he doesn't get ownd
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Mon, 21 February 2011, 02:25:04
Quote from: JelinaNU;298603
Hype! I'm ready to see HuK and the others hwaiting. I get up for work at 5am, though, so I won't be able to watch the matches until I get home. The Bo7 showmatch between Idra and Jinro starts at 5pm EST, too. So much goodness...

Are we observing the three-day rule regarding match spoilers in this thread?


Quote from: manfaux;298611
can't wait to see HuK play, hope he doesn't get ownd


Seems like a lot of us want HuK to do well, and I'm one of them!

It's gonna be late at night for me, but I usually stay up all the way to finish the cast.  I'm not sure what it's going to be like having to listen to Kelly throughout the entire cast instead of Artosis.

Is Kelly taking Dan's casting spot in Code A to give him a break?

And I completely forgot about IdrA and Jinro too.  Plus the announcement of the NASL, which is most likely the North American StarLeague or something like that.  $100k prize pool?  Unlikely, but that's the number being thrown around.

As far as spoilers go I'm pretty good at not revealing anything while still hinting at the games/matches to watch, so yeah I can go with that 3-day rule.  Anything after that is fair game for discussion!

gg gl hf!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hate on Mon, 21 February 2011, 08:56:41
i cant see HuK with his shaky pvz and pvp making far into code a let alone getting a spot in code s. with sc2 getting more global better to follow idras footsteps and return to his homeland.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Mon, 21 February 2011, 11:10:32
Quote from: hate;298730
i cant see HuK with his shaky pvz and pvp making far into code a let alone getting a spot in code s. with sc2 getting more global better to follow idras footsteps and return to his homeland.


well from last night's game his PvZ looks rock solid (I won't get into the details of the games..) These new bigger maps are really helping players like Huk because the Koreans are so good at cheesing and all-ins with their superior micros, i think a lot of the foreigners will definitely benefit from a more macro-oriented game.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Mon, 21 February 2011, 12:51:59
Quote from: hate;298730
i cant see HuK with his shaky pvz and pvp making far into code a let alone getting a spot in code s. with sc2 getting more global better to follow idras footsteps and return to his homeland.

We can't forget that oGs and TLAF`Liquid train and live in the same house.  You'd have to figure that training with arguably the best Protoss in the world (oGsMC) that he'd be able to pick up some things.  Being #1 on the KR and EU servers is something that should be recognized too.  You don't make it up there without having some sort of skill in all three matchups.

I do think that HuK will have a great chance to make it to Code S.  Looking at the brackets right now all he has to do is focus on his PvZ.  I don't see any other Terrans making it further than they are now, and the only other Toss on his side of the draw is ST_Ace, and that's not until the quarters assuming both of them make it that far.

As for the last point, I think it depends on the player.  Glory or money?  Obviously IdrA thinks he's the greatest player in the world and thus he's going to stick with what gives him the better payoff.

With HuK, it seems like all the time he's devoted to laddering to get ready for Assembly as well as the GSL Code A I'm inclined to think he's taken the same path that Jinro did and will stay in Korea for the glory.

Quote from: manfaux;298790
well from last night's game his PvZ looks rock solid (I won't get into the details of the games..) These new bigger maps are really helping players like Huk because the Koreans are so good at cheesing and all-ins with their superior micros, i think a lot of the foreigners will definitely benefit from a more macro-oriented game.

I absolutely love the new map pool and wish Blizzard would get a hint as to the quality of games on a larger map.  The GSTL was a prime example of how having macro maps leads to much more fun and exciting games.  Most people view macro games coming down to whoever has more skill.

Take players like TSL_Rain and BitbybitPrime.WE.  In the second GSL, all they did was just 2 Rax SCV allin against Zerg and they ended up making it quite far in the tournament.  After the next GSL and the up/down, neither of them are in Code S and will need to fight to stay in Code A.

Cheesy strategies game-after-game may work on ladder, but no longer in a  tournament setting that features macro-oriented maps.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JelinaNU on Mon, 21 February 2011, 16:43:57
Quote from: sawedust;298657
Is Kelly taking Dan's casting spot in Code A to give him a break?

Yeah, my understanding is that she will be solo casting Code A until GOM can find her a co-caster. Dan and Nick apparently requested the change -- although not Kelly specifically.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: guilleguillaume on Mon, 21 February 2011, 17:06:42
http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/incontrol

Don't lose this Match!

EGIdra vs LiquidJinro

Bo7

Winner earns 1500$.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Mon, 21 February 2011, 23:15:51
Quote from: JelinaNU;298978
Yeah, my understanding is that she will be solo casting Code A until GOM can find her a co-caster. Dan and Nick apparently requested the change -- although not Kelly specifically.


Yeah, I heard the same thing.  Hopefully Kelly will improve as that was her first cast.  We'll just have to see how everything turns out in the future.

Could you imagine having Kelly and TotalBiscuit cast GSL Code A.  o_O
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Mon, 21 February 2011, 23:30:56
Kelly is borderline unlistenable. I don't mind her accent so much, but I can't stand when her voice gets high pitched when stuff is going on. I'll probably tune into the Korean stream tonight.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Mon, 21 February 2011, 23:47:06
Quote from: speakeasy;299173
Kelly is borderline unlistenable. I don't mind her accent so much, but I can't stand when her voice gets high pitched when stuff is going on. I'll probably tune into the Korean stream tonight.


Then what about Artosis hmmm?

Artosis reacts to the GSTL (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLk7ezr9ojw)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Tue, 22 February 2011, 02:30:20
GSL Alert!

Two of the world's best players along with a BW legend are playing today in the Code S tournament!  Starting once again at 2310 HST.

As was the format in the previous Code S GSL, it's round robin in the groups where the top two players advance to the next round.

Group A
Set 1: IMmvp (T) oGsHyperdub (T)
Set 2: ST.July (Z) oGsMC (P)
Set 3: Winner of Set 1 < Tal'Darim Altar > Loser of Set 2
Set 4: Winner of Set 2 < Crossfire SE > Loser of Set 1
Set 5: 1st/2nd Place < Metalopolis > 1st/2nd Place
Set 6: 3rd/4th Place < Crossfire SE > 3rd/4th Place

Obviously Group A is the group of death.  IMMVP is regarded as the world's best player in SC2, which makes him the world's best Terran in SC2.  oGsMC is considered the best Protoss in the world and has a very wicked PvT game as we saw in his domination over Terrans in GSL3.  I think these two make it out of this group, but I wouldn't be surprised if July takes one of their spots away.  If anything it would be MC as I haven't seen MC's Zerg play as of late.  But as a fellow Protoss and MC fanboy I'd love to see him make it to the next round.

Group B
Set 1: Bye < Crevasse > TSL.Clide (T)
Set 2: oGsZenio (Z) < Terminus RE > ZeNexByun (T)
Set 3: TSL.Clide (T) < Metalopolis > Loser of Set 2
Set 4: Winner of Set 2 < Terminus RE > Bye
Set 5: 1st/2nd Place < Crevasse > 1st/2nd Place
Set 6: 3rd/4th Place < Shakuras Plateau > 3rd/4th Place

Then we have a somewhat lackluster group as there was a dropout in the gracken from of EGIdrA.  Clide's been underachieving compared to the hype that Tastosis loves to give him.  Byun did well in Code A last season taking second, and he seems to think that he's one of the best Terrans in the world (post-match interview after Code A last season).  Zenio's not a bad Zerg himself, plus he had the luxury of only having to worry about practicing his ZvT for this round.

I think Byun and Zenio make it through this group, but not the RO16 as they'll have to face whoever is one and two among Group A.

Thoughts?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Tue, 22 February 2011, 03:11:37
Hi guys, nice to see all the enthusiasm about the GSL here.  I watch esports to compare how I play vs. how professionals play.  It kinda sucks in that regard when they aren't playing ladder maps.  It almost isn't the same game that I'm playing.

As for predictions, I can't see MVP not winning the GSL again.  In group A, MVP and MC are by far the favorites to make it out.  I don't think Zenio can make it out of group B, really.  I'm not biased towards any player to win, but I'd like to see MVP vs. MC on a ladder map.  :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hate on Tue, 22 February 2011, 03:13:52
Quote from: sawedust;298832
As for the last point, I think it depends on the player.  Glory or money?  Obviously IdrA thinks he's the greatest player in the world and thus he's going to stick with what gives him the better payoff.

i think his practice environment was a big factor, the lack of practice partners (he cant practice all matchups with ret) and with the failure of establishing a EG pro house in Korea means he simply cannot get top notch practice. he mentioned a lot of times that hes sick with ladder play.

im kind of sad for idra, he seems to be the most unlucky with his picks, playing terran in bw on a protoss infested foreign scene and now with zerg in sc2.

Quote from: sawedust;298832
I absolutely love the new map pool and wish Blizzard would get a hint as to the quality of games on a larger map.  The GSTL was a prime example of how having macro maps leads to much more fun and exciting games.  Most people view macro games coming down to whoever has more skill.

yeah some of the GSTL games were really good and reminded bw management games.

Quote from: sawedust;298832
Cheesy strategies game-after-game may work on ladder, but no longer in a  tournament setting that features macro-oriented maps.

well you still can spawn close on meta or lt in gsl. crossfire seems to be lolosus and sentry heaven. terrans will struggle on the big maps i think, esp vs protoss that can somewhat haras while getting tech tree up (last mvp game in gstl a prime example of this).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Tue, 22 February 2011, 04:16:42
Quote from: Crypt;299232
Hi guys, nice to see all the enthusiasm about the GSL here.  I watch esports to compare how I play vs. how professionals play.  It kinda sucks in that regard when they aren't playing ladder maps.  It almost isn't the same game that I'm playing.

As for predictions, I can't see MVP not winning the GSL again.  In group A, MVP and MC are by far the favorites to make it out.  I don't think Zenio can make it out of group B, really.  I'm not biased towards any player to win, but I'd like to see MVP vs. MC on a ladder map.  :)


Thing is the Blizzard map pool is absolute crap with Delta Quadrant, Steppes of War, and Blistering Sands as some of the most hated maps in the rotation.  They're poorly designed and could even be considered imba in certain matchups.

The only good maps IMHO in the current rotation are Metal, LT, XNC, and Shakuras.

Blizzard needs to take a hint and integrate these GSL/GSTL maps into the pool.  Not only will it make for better (macro) games overall, but also help players improve as a whole with their overall game.

I understand where you're coming from, but unless we're at that level of play where we have near-perfect macro,a wicked game sense, and 10+ years of competitive Starcraft experience I doubt that a comparison between pros (like MVP and MC) and ourselves would make any sort of difference.

Quote from: hate;299234
i think his practice environment was a big factor, the lack of practice partners (he cant practice all matchups with ret) and with the failure of establishing a EG pro house in Korea means he simply cannot get top notch practice. he mentioned a lot of times that hes sick with ladder play.


I remember reading something about IdrA's ladder play that if he encountered any sort of non-standard play he'd just quit.  Poor guy.  Plus it is true about his practice partners, EG doesn't have the same type of connection that Liquid has with oGs.

Quote from: hate;299234
well you still can spawn close on meta or lt in gsl. crossfire seems to be lolosus and sentry heaven. terrans will struggle on the big maps i think, esp vs protoss that can somewhat haras while getting tech tree up (last mvp game in gstl a prime example of this).


True on LT and Metal, but overall don't you think larger maps lead to more competitive games?  The great Terrans won't struggle due to their superb ability to macro and multitask with drops, ala MVP or MKP.  Play styles continue to evolve and with bigger maps we may see some BW-quality, very exciting games in SC2.

We can bring balance into the discussion, but at not even a year old this game is still brand new and strategies are still being created.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Tue, 22 February 2011, 04:53:24
Quote from: sawedust;299182
Then what about Artosis hmmm?

Artosis reacts to the GSTL (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLk7ezr9ojw)


I have my gripes about Artosis as well, but if you mean to say they are anywhere near comparable in quality, then I just dunno man.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Tue, 22 February 2011, 05:35:24
Quote from: speakeasy;299248
I have my gripes about Artosis as well, but if you mean to say they are anywhere near comparable in quality, then I just dunno man.


Haha naw, just poking fun at that epic casting moment in SC2 history.

Although this sick Artosis isn't doing much for the argument. :(
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Tue, 22 February 2011, 06:14:48
lol I spend time watching the GSL in the teamliquid channel on SC2 and she's almost universally hated there. Though, there were some people that love her and want Artosis replaced for good.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: jdreamer on Tue, 22 February 2011, 06:15:52
By the way, what is your average APM?

I'm sitting at around 150-170, stays in 180-200+ during battles.

Just wondering..
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Twitchy on Tue, 22 February 2011, 10:43:42
I have no problems with Kelly, I think it's a good thing, it'll shake things up a bit. IMO Tasteless and Artosis were getting a bit lax in their attitude sometimes, not taking their jobs so seriously. Don't get me wrong, I like them and their good humour but when a game's playing I want commentary not lessons on guinea pigs! ;)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Tue, 22 February 2011, 13:57:29
Quote from: sawedust;299165

Could you imagine having Kelly and TotalBiscuit cast GSL Code A.  o_O


Would mean a muted GSL Code A for me. TotalBiscuit and the others I see with the radio broadcaster style voice tend to grate on my (Catspajamas is another) and I just mute them.

Quote from: jdreamer;299259
By the way, what is your average APM?

I'm sitting at around 150-170, stays in 180-200+ during battles.

Just wondering..


80, jumping to 200+ when needed.

Honestly, far too many people get caught up on APM. I see players with 140 average that can't macro and are just so busy spamming up their APM it just is silly. A vast majority of players I see on ladder have higher APMs than me but seem to do far less.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Tue, 22 February 2011, 14:12:09
today's GSL code S games blew my bind, lol.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Tue, 22 February 2011, 21:29:12
Quote from: speakeasy;299258
lol I spend time watching the GSL in the teamliquid channel on SC2 and she's almost universally hated there. Though, there were some people that love her and want Artosis replaced for good.


Quote from: Twitchy;299343
I have no problems with Kelly, I think it's a good thing, it'll shake things up a bit. IMO Tasteless and Artosis were getting a bit lax in their attitude sometimes, not taking their jobs so seriously. Don't get me wrong, I like them and their good humour but when a game's playing I want commentary not lessons on guinea pigs! ;)


I think it's because:
a. she has a heavy accent and viewers can't understand her,
b. being inexperienced with the game as a whole,
c. a female in a male-dominated game.

I don't see anything wrong with her as a caster, it was her first cast on an event of this magnitude.  Perhaps she just needs some time to get used to it.  Some say that was the full extent of her casting abilities.  We'll just have to see.

Quote from: jdreamer;299259
By the way, what is your average APM?

I'm sitting at around 150-170, stays in 180-200+ during battles.

Just wondering..


Quote from: Azuremen;299435
80, jumping to 200+ when needed.

Honestly, far too many people get caught up on APM. I see players with 140 average that can't macro and are just so busy spamming up their APM it just is silly. A vast majority of players I see on ladder have higher APMs than me but seem to do far less.


The Day[9] video that refers to APM is really helpful.  Some people think they're playing fast when they're just being inefficient.

As far as APM goes, I don't even keep track.  As long as I'm macroing well and keeping the pressure on my opponent I could care less if I'm at 100 APM or 300 APM.

But to be fair, anything under 60 APM once you hit the midgame and start engaging in battles mean that you're neither macroing properly nor microing your army well.

Quote from: manfaux;299445
today's GSL code S games blew my bind, lol.


I felt so bad for the loser in the last game. :(  He seemed so distraught!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Wed, 23 February 2011, 02:23:59
Quote from: sawedust;299243
I understand where you're coming from, but unless we're at that level of play where we have near-perfect macro,a wicked game sense, and 10+ years of competitive Starcraft experience I doubt that a comparison between pros (like MVP and MC) and ourselves would make any sort of difference.
I think it's not far off in SC2 for an amateur to have perfect macro.  I hope within 6 months, at least all master's league players will be macroing perfectly (money low, constant workers, and buildings exactly when required.)  By comparing myself to pros, I'm not saying that I'm very close to them, but in a lot of areas I'm not far from them, either.  However, I'm mostly interested in their stylistic choices on the maps that I play...whether the map is completely broken or not.  I understand a lot of people just want to see entertaining matches...just throwing out my preference.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 23 February 2011, 02:36:50
Quote from: Crypt;299716
I think it's not far off in SC2 for an amateur to have perfect macro.  I hope within 6 months, at least all master's league players will be macroing perfectly (money low, constant workers, and buildings exactly when required.)  By comparing myself to pros, I'm not saying that I'm very close to them, but in a lot of areas I'm not far from them, either.  However, I'm mostly interested in their stylistic choices on the maps that I play...whether the map is completely broken or not.  I understand a lot of people just want to see entertaining matches...just throwing out my preference.


Understood. :)  I remember when BoxeR came back for the first time playing against the Gracken (I think?) on XNC and everyone applauded him for using the towers' high grounds to siege up on.  It's this kind of creative use of the ladder maps that you're referring to, right?

Anyway GSL Code A back on tonight!  Kelly and Tasteless casting again.  2310 HST start time.

ST.Virus (T) vs. FOXMoon (Z)
GanZi (T) vs. Liquid`Haypro (Z)
ZeNEXCoca (Z) vs. ST.Ace (P)
SlayerSYuGiOh (Z) vs. LeenockfOu (Z)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Wed, 23 February 2011, 02:56:27
Interesting use of terrain is always awesome to see...like Boxer's 3 rax block on Shakuras.  I meant more generally, though...like what opener they decide to use and such.  I thought MVP's TvP on XNC was very interesting vs Tester I think.  He went for blueflame Hellion/drop (failed) and followed up with hellion/marauder/raven/banshee 1 base "all in" against an expanding Protoss.  It's just fascinating to see what styles pros decide to use when winning "matters" with money on the line.  It's a lot different when viewing ladder replays and whatnot because people do a lot of questionable things on there for practice/fun.  There's a lot of connectivity when pros are in the same situations that I'm in.  I recall times when I've been in those cases and how I'd react and see what they do...great fun!  In GSTL when the protoss player made Nexus first, I was just like okay cool, but no one would do that on a standard ladder map, so the rest of the game is just mostly going to be a foreign experience.

Just a random tangent -- my friend says he can beat most players on the ladder but not me because they are nowhere near as aggressive.  I thought about this and figured out that those players probably are afraid of losing when they play.  They won't attack if they think something might fail.  When I play, I just want to learn/improve, so I just attack repeatedly until I'm convinced that something won't work.  This way (making up numbers) I might be attacking 25% at bad times, but they are missing 50% of their attack opportunities.  At the same time, I'm getting feedback of when it's good to attack, and they are just staying clueless.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 23 February 2011, 03:56:26
Quote from: Crypt;299719
Interesting use of terrain is always awesome to see...like Boxer's 3 rax block on Shakuras.  I meant more generally, though...like what opener they decide to use and such.  I thought MVP's TvP on XNC was very interesting vs Tester I think.  He went for blueflame Hellion/drop (failed) and followed up with hellion/marauder/raven/banshee 1 base "all in" against an expanding Protoss.  It's just fascinating to see what styles pros decide to use when winning "matters" with money on the line.

I remember watching some of the pro players and watching Terran use elevators for the first time.  It blew my mind to know how to abuse certain things that each race has.

Quote from: Crypt;299719
It's a lot different when viewing ladder replays and whatnot because people do a lot of questionable things on there for practice/fun.  There's a lot of connectivity when pros are in the same situations that I'm in.  I recall times when I've been in those cases and how I'd react and see what they do...great fun!  In GSTL when the protoss player made Nexus first, I was just like okay cool, but no one would do that on a standard ladder map, so the rest of the game is just mostly going to be a foreign experience.

On ladder, you're allowed to play with a single build in each and/or all of your matchups if you want as it's very likely you're not going to run into the same players two or three times in a row.

Some of the benefits of the ladder is that element of cheese, which gives you practice against it in a situation where you're pressured to perform well.  But outside of tournaments or having excellent practice partners, there's no other way to really practice being in a pressure situation than to play on the ladder.

That's not the case in a Best of X series, where you need to vary your play from game to game.

While playing ladder may not be the ideal situation for most players (see EGIdrA), most people will play their best and play standard.  I find that a lot of the creative/irregular type of plays come in custom games where there's absolutely no pressure to play well.

EDIT: 15 Nexus is actually a pretty good opening at the higher levels against Zerg on larger maps.  The Nexus first allows the Protoss player to pull ahead in economy as Zerg needs to be one base ahead to stay even.  However, it's much easier to go with a 3 gate sentry expand as it's much safer than Nexus/Forge opening.

Quote from: Crypt;299719
Just a random tangent -- my friend says he can beat most players on the ladder but not me because they are nowhere near as aggressive.  I thought about this and figured out that those players probably are afraid of losing when they play.  They won't attack if they think something might fail.

Same thing can be said about professional poker players.  You have to be selectively aggressive, but always pushing and pressuring your opponents.  EGiNcontrol calls the Starcraft equivalent of this as "shark mode."  You want to be poking around at all time, controlling the towers, feign pressure or a push against your opponent, etc.

At the lower levels, indecisiveness and being passive is a downfall of a lot of less experienced and/or lesser-skilled players.  They're too concerned about whether or not something is going to work instead of being confident in their own skills.  This is where the skill gap that Azuremen brought up about units and balance takes effect.

If you're confident in your playing ability and utilize the shark mode mentality, you put your opponent on his or her heels.  By forcing them to play passively and react to your aggression you can force mistakes and/or alter your opponent's plans.

Quote from: Crypt;299719
When I play, I just want to learn/improve, so I just attack repeatedly until I'm convinced that something won't work.  This way (making up numbers) I might be attacking 25% at bad times, but they are missing 50% of their attack opportunities.  At the same time, I'm getting feedback of when it's good to attack, and they are just staying clueless.

Selective aggression and utilize the shark mode mentality.  Learning timings comes with playing a lot of games which also develops your game sense.  We all want to improve yet have fun at the same time!

I find this discussion is not only interesting but helpful!  Let's keep it up!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 23 February 2011, 05:14:42
To be fair, Tasteless is pretty damn bad without Artosis at his side as well. I know there might be a lot of new viewers, but he points out the obvious way too much. I wonder why lilsusie isn't casting anymore, maybe I'll ask at the next TLNY meet.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 23 February 2011, 05:26:00
Quote from: speakeasy;299739
To be fair, Tasteless is pretty damn bad without Artosis at his side as well. I know there might be a lot of new viewers, but he points out the obvious way too much. I wonder why lilsusie isn't casting anymore, maybe I'll ask at the next TLNY meet.


I think it's more of the fact that he has to take over the analysis role instead of the play-by-play and entertainment role.  It doesn't help that his casting partner is a downgrade from Artosis as far as player skill and experience goes, but he's doing an excellent job to cover for Kelly's inexperience.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 23 February 2011, 06:25:13
See, that R. Kelly joke is why I still enjoy tasteless despite his poor commentary. Kelly has yet to demonstrate that she has any redeeming qualities to me. But that's enough from me about that, I'll keep an open mind.

I'm really excited for the next set of matches. Betting on NaDa, Jinro, Top and Check, though I'd be happy if ITR beat Check. I'd bet on ITR if it were the old map pool, but the new map pool favors Check IMO.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: JinDesu on Thu, 24 February 2011, 11:03:02
Quote from: speakeasy;299739
To be fair, Tasteless is pretty damn bad without Artosis at his side as well. I know there might be a lot of new viewers, but he points out the obvious way too much. I wonder why lilsusie isn't casting anymore, maybe I'll ask at the next TLNY meet.


I've heard that she's pretty busy with her full time job, so she doesn't want to drop it for part time casting.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Fri, 25 February 2011, 02:43:46
Quote from: sawedust;299646
The Day[9] video that refers to APM is really helpful.  Some people think they're playing fast when they're just being inefficient.

As far as APM goes, I don't even keep track.  As long as I'm macroing well and keeping the pressure on my opponent I could care less if I'm at 100 APM or 300 APM.

But to be fair, anything under 60 APM once you hit the midgame and start engaging in battles mean that you're neither macroing properly nor microing your army well.


I'd agree. And it varies from race to race. When I play as Zerg, my APM floats more around 110 on average in a 15 to 20 minute game, while my Protoss will sit a bit lower.

Really, it is just important that your actions scale with the game. Often if I go to 5 bases and am playing well, my APM will be over 100 on average with P just from all the macro and making sure I don't float money by applying constant pressure and harass. But in a 10 minute game the average will be more around 60, simply not as much stuff to do.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Fri, 25 February 2011, 09:21:51
I don't  think I can watch code A anymore, this kelly chick needs to stop mumbling and talk slower, I thought Jason Lee was bad.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Fri, 25 February 2011, 14:55:30
Haven't been online much in the past few days, been too busy with real life problems that I needed to take care of.  Now that everything's alright I can get back to some SC2 action!  Been desperately missing out on it.

But one thing's for sure, that break really helped me regain some confidence in my play.  Went 4-1 on ladder this morning, ended my day at 2975 diamond or so.  Got a few easy wins because my opponents tried to cheese me and failed, so I was very glad about that.

Missed out on the past couple of GSLs too!  Gonna have to watch the replays and see what I missed.

Quote from: Azuremen;300689
I'd agree. And it varies from race to race. When I play as Zerg, my APM floats more around 110 on average in a 15 to 20 minute game, while my Protoss will sit a bit lower.

Really, it is just important that your actions scale with the game. Often if I go to 5 bases and am playing well, my APM will be over 100 on average with P just from all the macro and making sure I don't float money by applying constant pressure and harass. But in a 10 minute game the average will be more around 60, simply not as much stuff to do.


Very true.  As Zerg, there are so many more things that you have to do which is why APM is naturally higher.  Spreading creep, injecting larva, hatching units, rallying units.  So maaaaany thiiiings.  That's probably the reason why I can't play Zerg very well.  It's very unforgiving to the point where one mistake can cost you the entire game.

As long as we remember to keep making units throughout the game along with simple micro, there's no reason why we can't hit 100 APM easily.  Overall APM isn't necessarily an important thing to worry about at our level of play.  The only thing I can see it being useful for is to pseudo-impress your lower level SC2 friends into thinking you're extremely good. :/

Quote from: manfaux;300803
I don't  think I can watch code A anymore, this kelly chick needs to stop mumbling and talk slower, I thought Jason Lee was bad.


I think it's more of the gameplay in Code A than it is the commentating for me.  Compared to Code S, I don't find much interest in these games as they aren't as exciting.  It doesn't matter who's casting the games there IMO as they don't offer much entertainment value to me anyway.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Fri, 25 February 2011, 15:00:49
Quote from: sawedust;300970

I think it's more of the gameplay in Code A than it is the commentating for me.  Compared to Code S, I don't find much interest in these games as they aren't as exciting.  It doesn't matter who's casting the games there IMO as they don't offer much entertainment value to me anyway.


True, that combined with Dame Kelly's horrid accent just make code A worse than it already is. Although those SuperNova-Squirtle games were great, I urge everyone to watch them.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Sat, 26 February 2011, 00:34:06
GSL Code S is on right now!  Apologies for not posting this up earlier.

Set 1: IMNesTea (Z) < Shakuras Plateau > NSHoSeo.San (P)
Set 2: SlayerSBoxeR (T) < Tal'Darim Altar > oGsEnsnare (T)
Set 3: Winner of Set 1 < Xel'Naga Caverns > Loser of Set 2
Set 4: Winner of Set 2 < Tal'Darim Altar > Loser of Set 1
Set 5: 3rd/4th Place < Shakuras Plateau > 3rd/4th Place
Set 6: 1st/2nd Place < Shakuras Plateau > 1st/2nd Place

I placed my Liquibets on BoxeR and Nestea for obvious reasons, but as a Protoss player myself I'm really hoping for San to do well!  I felt like he was cheesed out of GSL and his up and down matches still showed a lot of nerves for him.

Set 1: choyafOu (P) < Scrap Station > FOXLyn (T)
Set 2: NSHoSeo.Banbanssu (P) < Terminus RE > oGsTheWinD (Z)
Set 3: Winner of Set 1 < Terminus RE > Loser of Set 2
Set 4: Winner of Set 2 < Tal'Darim Altar > Loser of Set 1
Set 5: 3rd/4th Place < Metalopolis > 3rd/4th Place
Set 6: 1st/2nd Place < Tal'Darim Altar > 1st/2nd Place

Once again cheering for my Brotoss!  Choya should make it out of this group as he's been more consistent in all the previous GSLs over the other ones.

Overall a lot of great games today!  Looking forward to seeing the discussion about these later.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Sat, 26 February 2011, 00:34:08
I feel bad for Kelly, she is likely nervous and you can hear her accent change according to the situation. I'd give her a bit more time to get use to the gig before I pass too much judgement. Though yes, at the moment her voice isn't particularly attractive with the accent at the moment, but shrug.

More interesting is the PTR patch that just game out, 1.3. The full notes can be found here (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/2356436#blog) but I'll just quote the balance changes.

Quote from: Blizzard, PTR 1.3
Balance

GENERAL
Players can no longer hide units by setting them in a close proximity patrol (Viking flower).
 
PROTOSS
Mothership
-Units leaving the Mothership's Vortex are now un-targetable and immune to damage for 1.5 seconds.
High Templar
-Khaydarin Amulet upgrade (+25 starting energy) has been removed.
Zealot
-Charging Zealots will now hit fleeing targets at least once.
 
TERRAN
Battlecruiser
-Movement speed increased from 1.406 to 1.875.
Bunker
-Build time increased from 35 to 40 seconds.
Tech Lab
-Stimpack upgrade research time increased from 140 to 170 seconds.
 
ZERG
Infestor
-Health increased from 90 to 110.
-Fungal Growth
-Stun duration decreased from 8 to 4 seconds.
-Damage increased by +30% vs. armored units.
-Now fires a missile instead of being instant cast.

Honestly, it is like Blizzard wants people to not use the Mothership for anything besides late game recall busting. And for P to only go Colossi in every match up with that Amulet removal. The Charge bit on Zealots is nice, but really Blizzard, discourage opting for something besides Colossi even more?

It will be neat to see BCs more often, and the Bunker and Stim times will reduce the effectiveness of early Terran pressure a bit, but I don't see it changing the match up enough to merit the removal of Amulet, which was the late game option that P could produce to force a transition out of pure MMM with some Vikings from T.

The Infestor buffs are good, as they are a bit too fragile at the moment and Fungal took a bit too long to do its damage before, and the extra damage will make them a touch more effective against Stalkers and Marauders.

But I really feel like Blizzard has some things mixed up in their heads. There is already almost no reason to build a Fleet Beacon now that they removed Flux Vanes, and nerfing the MS a bit doesn't make any sense.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Sat, 26 February 2011, 03:26:23
I got everything wrong on liquibet LOL!

[edit] also, screw the patch! they took away my BBS rush, now my bunker rushes and early stim timings :(
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Sat, 26 February 2011, 11:16:26
Just played PTR, 4 sec is definitely too short, it feels like Psi Storm now lol

every other change is pretty good.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Sun, 27 February 2011, 18:02:36
Some comments on the proposed changes (I'm primarily a Terran player in 1v1):

Stim nerf probably won't change TvZ too much, but it's going to shift TvP to late game where P is considered stronger already.

The HT energy nerf is intended to deny the ability to instantly spawn and psi storm defend distant expos from what I can gather.

The bunker nerf is probably intended to stop 2 rax bunker rushes, but I don't think it'll change anything.  I imagine it to have a stronger effect against reactive defensive bunkering.

Fungal buff -- I'd have to see it in action.  Naturally, it forces more tank use, which mutas are good against.  But, gas supply will be lighter after production of infestors, so I'd have to see how it plays out.

The Vortex nerf is because AOE spells are doing more damage than intended since units exiting Vortex ignore collision and clump up too much (archon toilet).  I think the mothership still has plenty of use, and it's not even a game balancing unit (as in, most games end without a mothership being created.)  This may change if/when larger maps are played, though.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Mon, 28 February 2011, 02:30:34
Quote from: Azuremen;301235
More interesting is the PTR patch that just game out, 1.3. The full notes can be found here (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/2356436#blog) but I'll just quote the balance changes.

Honestly, it is like Blizzard wants people to not use the Mothership for anything besides late game recall busting. And for P to only go Colossi in every match up with that Amulet removal. The Charge bit on Zealots is nice, but really Blizzard, discourage opting for something besides Colossi even more?

It will be neat to see BCs more often, and the Bunker and Stim times will reduce the effectiveness of early Terran pressure a bit, but I don't see it changing the match up enough to merit the removal of Amulet, which was the late game option that P could produce to force a transition out of pure MMM with some Vikings from T.

But I really feel like Blizzard has some things mixed up in their heads. There is already almost no reason to build a Fleet Beacon now that they removed Flux Vanes, and nerfing the MS a bit doesn't make any sense.


As much as I want to jump in on the Brotoss hate on not having the extra energy available from Khydarian Amulet, I think it's a move where it forces the Toss player to make an early decision in going HT in order for Storm to be useful.  As a Protoss player myself I am quite disappointed in that decision, but I somewhat see the reasoning behind it.  Just gonna have to make more Colossi and Phoenix now.

Not once have I ever built a Fleet Beacon.  Ever.

Quote from: speakeasy;301263
I got everything wrong on liquibet LOL!

[edit] also, screw the patch! they took away my BBS rush, now my bunker rushes and early stim timings :(


So did I. *smh*  I missed the BBS rush, but looks like it forces Terran to go into the midgame now.  Not that they can't rush with 2 Rax SCV, but the nerf on Stim is really going to affect early timing pushes.

Quote from: Crypt;301907
Some comments on the proposed changes (I'm primarily a Terran player in 1v1):

Stim nerf probably won't change TvZ too much, but it's going to shift TvP to late game where P is considered stronger already.

The HT energy nerf is intended to deny the ability to instantly spawn and psi storm defend distant expos from what I can gather.

The bunker nerf is probably intended to stop 2 rax bunker rushes, but I don't think it'll change anything.  I imagine it to have a stronger effect against reactive defensive bunkering.

Fungal buff -- I'd have to see it in action.  Naturally, it forces more tank use, which mutas are good against.  But, gas supply will be lighter after production of infestors, so I'd have to see how it plays out.

The Vortex nerf is because AOE spells are doing more damage than intended since units exiting Vortex ignore collision and clump up too much (archon toilet).  I think the mothership still has plenty of use, and it's not even a game balancing unit (as in, most games end without a mothership being created.)  This may change if/when larger maps are played, though.


Pretty much, for everything.  I'm still disappointed in the removal of the archon toilet, that was fun to watch as a viewer.  Though I can see its use to rescue units and make them invincible... against certain armies it's just prolonging the death.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Mon, 28 February 2011, 02:45:10
GSL Code A on tonight!  2300 HST, please adjust for your time zone.

Cute aka MVPNoblesse (T) vs MakaPrime.WE (T)
TSL_Alive (T) vs oGsCezanne (Z)
SlayerS_Jjob (T) vs Liquid`Ret (Z)
TSL_Killer (P) vs oGsJookTo (Z)

Let's go Killer aka SangHo!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Mon, 28 February 2011, 06:27:45
Quote from: sawedust;302054
As much as I want to jump in on the Brotoss hate on not having the extra energy available from Khydarian Amulet, I think it's a move where it forces the Toss player to make an early decision in going HT in order for Storm to be useful.  As a Protoss player myself I am quite disappointed in that decision, but I somewhat see the reasoning behind it.  Just gonna have to make more Colossi and Phoenix now.

Not once have I ever built a Fleet Beacon.  Ever.


The Amulet could use some adjustment, but to just remove it from the game is a bit much. 45 seconds is ages to wait for an HT to have storm at any stage of the game, and will just make EMP that much better. Even Jinro thinks it is a bit too much of a change.

As for the Fleet Beacon, you are missing out on some funny builds that mess with people. I've done some 2 base Carrier play against Zerg and it is quite amusing to watch how the react. I had one guy fly into my base after I did a Forge FE with Mutas only to find 2 Carriers with +1, and combined with Chargelots will decimate Hydras if they opt for that. If they go Corrupter, cuts into their ground army heavily and you can just over run them with Gateway units. I haven't done it in ages but it is tempting to consider again in the current meta game.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Mon, 28 February 2011, 19:48:05
last night's game was hilarious, watch Sangho vs. Jookto 's last game:

Kelly: I think Code A is fiwefi*&^%#fiwhufh Code S
Artosis: Huh?

LOL i fell off my chair laughing.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Tue, 01 March 2011, 03:33:24
GSL Code S is on again tonight and has already started! (2310 HST, your time may vary)

Set 1: TSL.Trickster (P) < Metalopolis > anyproPrime.WE (P)
Set 2: MvPGenius (P) < Shakuras Plateau > TSL.Fruitdealer (Z)
Set 3: Winner of Set 1 < Shakuras Plateau > Loser of Set 2
Set 4: Winner of Set 2 < Xel'Naga Caverns > Loser of Set 1
Set 5: 3rd/4th Place < Tal'Darim Altar > 3rd/4th Place
Set 6: 1st/2nd Place < Tal'Darim Altar > 1st/2nd Place

Cheering for Trickster and Genius!  Always enjoyed Ki Soo's play since the beta.  I like Genius as well because of his BM-like attitude towards others.  Strong personalities always make for an exciting matchup.  As much as I want Fruitdealer to succeed because of his troubles in games lately, I don't think he'll make it out of the top two.

Set 1: MarineKingPrime.WE (T) < Terminus RE > ZeNEXKyrix (Z)
Set 2: sCfOu (T) < Tal'Darim Altar > oGsInCa (P)
Set 3: Winner of Set 1 < Xel'Naga Caverns > Loser of Set 2
Set 4: Winner of Set 2 < Terminus RE > Loser of Set 1
Set 5: 3rd/4th Place < Tal'Darim Altar > 3rd/4th Place
Set 6: 1st/2nd Place < Shakuras Plateau > 1st/2nd Place

Going for MKP and Inca here.  MKP has been such a powerful player over all of the GSL seasons and without MVP and Nestea to deal with (leaving only oGsMC) the door is wide open for him to win his first GSL.

Only choosing Inca because he's a Brotoss :P
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Tue, 01 March 2011, 19:45:08
Quote from: sawedust;302610
Going for MKP and Inca here.  MKP has been such a powerful player over all of the GSL seasons and without MVP and Nestea to deal with (leaving only oGsMC) the door is wide open for him to win his first GSL.

Only choosing Inca because he's a Brotoss :P

ownd.

The up/down matches this season is gonna be like Code S semifinals, lmao.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Tue, 01 March 2011, 21:16:49
Sanzenith has been my favorite player since the first time I saw him lose.

Manzenith fighting!

http://i.imgur.com/5IeQG.jpg
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Tue, 01 March 2011, 23:06:55
Quote from: manfaux;303160
ownd.

The up/down matches this season is gonna be like Code S semifinals, lmao.


Yeah :(  My liquibet is probably one for 16 or something over this season's GSL.  It's awesome to see a lot of players really stepping up their game since we last saw them.  Definitely closes the skill gap in Korea.

It also forces a lot of the top players who got eliminated to step up their game and not bank on just their past performances and ability.  They need to practice more, as those lower level players must have been practicing for-freakin-ever to get to where they are this season as opposed to previous seasons.

Closest analogy I can think of is BJ Penn from the UFC in his earlier days: one of the most skilled, talented fighters to ever step foot into the Octagon.  His only problem?  His lack of will to train.  Because he was such a gifted fighter, he could show up and win without having to train hard.

I don't know if you guys have been watching the IEM, but ST_Ace has been destroying everyone in his group.  5-0, never losing a single game.

Thing is he's not even in Code A anymore after being eliminated in the first round.

IdrA went 4-1, his only loss being to Ace.  It didn't appear like he had a tough time with the group either and just breezed on through.

I think with these results, as well as the surprises in Korea, it's safe to say that Korean players are just on another level as compared to the foreigners.  I clump IdrA in with the Koreans for this example as he's been a consistent Code S finisher every single season until he left.

Looks like IdrA made the right decision to leave Korea and join the foreign scene, the quality of competition is much lower.  Should lead to easier paydays for the Gracken.

Quote from: Crypt;303201
Sanzenith has been my favorite player since the first time I saw him lose.

Manzenith fighting!

http://i.imgur.com/5IeQG.jpg


No more SadZenith!

Time for him to be the face of NSHoSeo.  I am going to laugh so hard if he ends up winning this season's GSL.  Tastosis is going to have a lot of butt kissing to do :biggrin:
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Tue, 01 March 2011, 23:46:26
Quote from: sawedust;303236


Looks like IdrA made the right decision to leave Korea and join the foreign scene, the quality of competition is much lower.  Should lead to easier paydays for the Gracken.


definitely, but one less foreigner in GSL :(

seriously though, the foreigner SC2 is going nowhere(just like bw),  IEM invited the best European pros out there, i mean, tarson, morrow and whitera, plus qxc and idra, that's a westerner dream team right there, and guess what, STace roflstomped through the group 10-0. Ten-****ing-zero?

Squirtle is playing tomorrow and I expect nothing but domination just like ST ace.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 02 March 2011, 02:42:53
Two more events going on tonight!  Definitely a wonderful time for SC2 to blossom.  It's unfortunate that some of us may not be able to watch it because of time differences, but for me I'm going to stay up to watch these games until my biological clock tells me to shut down.

We'll start off with GSL Code A!  Round of 16.  Because of all the KOs we've seen in the Ro32 in the Code S tournament, it's much more important to finish in the top two of Code A as you get to handpick your opponents.

GSL Code A Round of 16 - 1800 KST, GMT +9.  Your time may vary.
Best of 3 format.

IMLoSirA (Z) vs. ST.August (T)
Liquid`HuK (P) vs. TSL_Revival (Z)
ST.Virus (T) vs. GanZi (T)
ZeNEXCoca (Z) vs. LeenockfOu (Z)

HuK fighting!  For all of that showmanship (albeit for Kelly) in his victory ceremony in his last match, he has to pull through.  GomTV has Huk as an underdog against TSL.Revival for his next match.  It's not all bad though; it's been a horrible time for Zerg players right now, with Protoss finding ways to easily roll over them with a Deathball.  Even Artosis and IdrA referred to the deathball as imba.

Picking LoSirA, Huk, GanZi (so good in his last match against Haypro), and Leenock.

Intel Extreme Masters
Round robin play.  Top three advance.

dignitas.Sjow (T)
ST.Squirtle (P)
attax.Socke (P)
FnaticMSI.Fenix (T)
FOXMoon (Z)
FXOmOOnGLaDe (Z)

In my previous post, I mentioned that Koreans are clearly on another level over the foreign scene.  With that said, I expect Squirtle to roll over this entire group.  He even knocked out arguably the best SC2 player right now, IMMVP, in the GSTL.  Granted MVP got knocked out of Code S too, but many still think he's one of the best in the world right now.

Wondering how Sjow will do.  He talked a lot of smack about how foreigners can compete with Koreans, and how he could do well in the GSL if he had a spot.  Next big tournament he enters, he doesn't even make it past group play.  This is going to see if he's learned his lesson and backs up his talk.

Lots of fanboys for Moonglade out there!  Also hoping he'll do okay.  Haven't really gotten a chance to watch him play, but apparently his style has earned him a lot of fans.

Overall, I think Squirtle is a lock to advance.  The rest is up in the air.  I don't know if Moon is going to do well.  He may be Korean, but his Zerg is subpar at best when compared to others at his level.  He was a beast at WC3; it's a shame to see it hasn't carried over into SC2.  Perhaps a race change is in order?

Quote from: manfaux;303244
definitely, but one less foreigner in GSL :(

seriously though, the foreigner SC2 is going nowhere(just like bw),  IEM invited the best European pros out there, i mean, tarson, morrow and whitera, plus qxc and idra, that's a westerner dream team right there, and guess what, STace roflstomped through the group 10-0. Ten-****ing-zero?

Squirtle is playing tomorrow and I expect nothing but domination just like ST ace.

Completely agree.  Foreigners can't really compete with Koreans right now unless they're there.  Really Jinro and IdrA are the only ones who've shown they can hang with the big boys.

For qxc to go 0-5 was really shocking.  I thought as one of the best NA Terrans he'd easily win a few games.  I was extremely mistaken.  Not the best showing at all.

Morrow advanced, but not convincingly.  I think it's because Zerg is limited as a race right now.  We know he chose to play Zerg over Terran because of the challenge, and IdrA said if Morrow ever won a tournament as Zerg he'd never state the game was imba ever again.  To this day Morrow still hasn't won anything major as a Zerg player.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Wed, 02 March 2011, 03:23:58
Squirtle is out it seems, shame really as I liked his play. Then again, most of the players are interesting, so I'm excited to see how this turns out.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 02 March 2011, 03:47:35
I bet on the same guys sawed, though I only voted HuK cause he's a foreigner.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 02 March 2011, 04:44:51
Quote from: vun;303296
Squirtle is out it seems, shame really as I liked his play. Then again, most of the players are interesting, so I'm excited to see how this turns out.


Not yet, they're still in the round robin phase.  Without spoiling anything, Squirtle is still in the running to make it to the next round.

To prevent spoilers, we usually refrain from posting results until three days after.  Thing is, most people care more about the GSL than the IEM, so maybe we can talk about it here freely.  Up to everyone else yet.

Quote from: speakeasy;303303
I bet on the same guys sawed, though I only voted HuK cause he's a foreigner.


Those were some crazy PvZ games we just watched!  An even better interview following that, LOL.

Excited to watch GanZI play now.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Wed, 02 March 2011, 04:55:47
Qxc hasn't gotten much practice since his move to Spain.  There's an IEM replay pack up somewhere.  I watched a few of them...no impressive Terrans for me to study, though.  :P
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Wed, 02 March 2011, 04:57:51
Quote from: sawedust;303320


To prevent spoilers, we usually refrain from posting results until three days after.  Thing is, most people care more about the GSL than the IEM, so maybe we can talk about it here freely.  Up to everyone else yet.



Oh, sorry about that. I'm used to discuss SC2 wit some of my friends, so spoilers etc. has never been an issue. I'll keep that in mind from now on.

Also, did Blizz and KeSPA kiss and make up yet? I heard KeSPA pulled a lot of good Korean teams from all tournaments until they reached an agreement with Blizz about tournament fees and stuff. Not sure what the status on that is now.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 02 March 2011, 05:15:54
Quote from: Crypt;303321
Qxc hasn't gotten much practice since his move to Spain.  There's an IEM replay pack up somewhere.  I watched a few of them...no impressive Terrans for me to study, though.  :P


That's too bad.  He was a great player earlier in the year, but there are other priorities I guess.  Hard to find good replay packs now days.

Quote from: vun;303323
Oh, sorry about that. I'm used to discuss SC2 wit some of my friends, so spoilers etc. has never been an issue. I'll keep that in mind from now on.

Also, did Blizz and KeSPA kiss and make up yet? I heard KeSPA pulled a lot of good Korean teams from all tournaments until they reached an agreement with Blizz about tournament fees and stuff. Not sure what the status on that is now.


No problem!  Glad we're on the same page!  I myself have had to hold back on results seeing as how everything gets posted instantly on TL.

Nah, I don't think they've made up yet, nor do I think it's going to happen soon.  Just going off what I've heard and read.  Not a BW player so I don't have much experience with the backstory, but I heard it was a huge mess.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Wed, 02 March 2011, 05:23:03
I read a lot about the KeSPA vs Blizz when it all started, apparently KeSPA didn't like Blizz charging for tournaments with rewards above a certain amount, so they pulled all the teams they control out of any official tournaments. Or at least that's what I got out of it.

On a side note; Blizz said that with SC2 the online experience would be so smooth and good you would never ever need LAN.
10-15 minutes or so ago one of the players disconnected in the GSL. Not the first time that's happened, there were connection problems during one of the IEM tournaments as well. I can't really say whether or not it's Blizzard's fault, but it looks sort of bad.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 02 March 2011, 05:28:19
WCG might not have any Blizz games either due to the issues with KeSPA.

KeSPA and Blizzard are both jerks. Neither should have a monopoly on broadcasting Starcraft gaming, it just hurts the growth of the scene.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Wed, 02 March 2011, 05:35:16
True, a lot of people are siding with KeSPA because "ActiBlizz is now a huge evil greedy corporation" or something along those lines, but KeSPA is just as greedy. Still, as if SC on TV wasn't far enough away, charging for tournaments has, as far as I've gathered, killed the possibility outside of Korea.

Also, I would still like a LAN option. Not a big issue, but I'd rather have it than not.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 02 March 2011, 05:37:01
Quote from: vun;303327
I read a lot about the KeSPA vs Blizz when it all started, apparently KeSPA didn't like Blizz charging for tournaments with rewards above a certain amount, so they pulled all the teams they control out of any official tournaments. Or at least that's what I got out of it.

On a side note; Blizz said that with SC2 the online experience would be so smooth and good you would never ever need LAN.
10-15 minutes or so ago one of the players disconnected in the GSL. Not the first time that's happened, there were connection problems during one of the IEM tournaments as well. I can't really say whether or not it's Blizzard's fault, but it looks sort of bad.


Good to know.

Just having LAN play available could prevent all of this.  I know they want to get more money by forcing everyone to have a license in order to play online, but having disconnects during major tournaments is unacceptable.

Quote from: speakeasy;303329
WCG might not have any Blizz games either due to the issues with KeSPA.

KeSPA and Blizzard are both jerks. Neither should have a monopoly on broadcasting Starcraft gaming, it just hurts the growth of the scene.


Yeah, I also heard SC2 may and probably will be absent from WCG this year.  Why can't they just all get along?  It hurts the viewers and fans of e-sports in the long run.

For a game that's close to making a mark into the western world, I would think that Blizzard would want as much exposure as possible.  NASL and MLG will make SC2 recognizable in the US just for the prize pool amount.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 02 March 2011, 05:50:13
Ideally for me, KeSPA would just fade away from relevance, and Blizz would loosen their stranglehold on the game, but it's not gonna happen. ActiBlizz has the SC2 scene by the nuts and isn't gonna let go. I just hope Korean leagues will form that ignore Blizz's TOS and force Blizz to capitulate. Or perhaps now that China has now legalized SC2, someone there will reverse engineer Battle.NET lol.

Younger players just starting out aren't gonna be playing BroodWar, and once a steady stream of new players isn't there to replace the retiring BW progamers, we're gonna see a reversal between SC2 and BW. Whereas now you see former BW scrubs looking for success in SC2, Broodwar is gonna be the game that those who can't cut it in pro SC2 play.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Wed, 02 March 2011, 06:12:25
I would really like to see more BW play, I'm not too good at BW but it is so fun to watch with good casters.

Also; this is an interesting read (http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=142288).

Edit: This is also relevant (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=168895).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Qwerty on Wed, 02 March 2011, 08:03:29
Man I've been waking up late and only being able to catch the GSL an hour into it...

Something occurred to me today though... Kelly's the only person there who doesn't go by a handle name. In fact she's really the ONLY face in starcraft 2 who isn't using a handle...

Any ideas for what a good handle might be?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Wed, 02 March 2011, 10:58:19
Quote from: Qwerty;303374
Man I've been waking up late and only being able to catch the GSL an hour into it...

Something occurred to me today though... Kelly's the only person there who doesn't go by a handle name. In fact she's really the ONLY face in starcraft 2 who isn't using a handle...

Any ideas for what a good handle might be?


MsMumblR
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Wed, 02 March 2011, 10:59:18
Quote from: vun;303296
Squirtle is out it seems, shame really as I liked his play. Then again, most of the players are interesting, so I'm excited to see how this turns out.

 didn't even know Moon is at the IEM, another 5-0 sweep, lol, fail europeans.

Squirtle is having a bit of a downfall recently, he'll be back though.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 02 March 2011, 13:44:35
Quote from: vun;303341
I would really like to see more BW play, I'm not too good at BW but it is so fun to watch with good casters.

Also; this is an interesting read (http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=142288).

Edit: This is also relevant (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=168895).


Thanks for the links, gonna check that out fully when I have time.  Just took a quick glance.

Quote from: Qwerty;303374
Man I've been waking up late and only being able to catch the GSL an hour into it...

Something occurred to me today though... Kelly's the only person there who doesn't go by a handle name. In fact she's really the ONLY face in starcraft 2 who isn't using a handle...

Any ideas for what a good handle might be?


Kelly does have a handle, it's KellyMilkies.  Much easier to say than Kelly Ong Xiao Wei.

As for good handles...





Quote from: manfaux;303473
didn't even know Moon is at the IEM, another 5-0 sweep, lol, fail europeans.

Squirtle is having a bit of a downfall recently, he'll be back though.


Epic, epic showdown to claim that third spot.  I went to sleep while they were still in the group stages some seven hours ago, woke up and found out they were still playing a three-way playoff to determine who ends up getting that third spot.

Definitely gonna have to go back and watch some VODs.  Not from Husky though, I want some real casters.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 02 March 2011, 16:02:31
hehehe, a good number of those troll names are me :) I even made a guide on teamliquid about how to get your question asked in order to troll GOMtv forums last year.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Wed, 02 March 2011, 16:06:03
Regarding the disconnect in GSL, the players aren't playing on Battle.net if they are still using the system that they claimed to be using before (from what I heard.)  Supposedly, they claim to be using their own private server to have GSL games on.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 02 March 2011, 16:10:32
Yeah, I heard that Blizzard sets up their own private servers for the GSL and gives everyone an account on that server. You can tell they're not using their laddering accounts cause everyone's portraits is the noob default portrait.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Qwerty on Wed, 02 March 2011, 19:59:47
Quote from: speakeasy;303628
hehehe, a good number of those troll names are me :) I even made a guide on teamliquid about how to get your question asked in order to troll GOMtv forums last year.


Are you poopfeast420?

Will you sign my keyboard?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Kelsin on Wed, 02 March 2011, 20:32:31
I found this site while looking for keyboards for sc2. Bought my first filco in the classifieds and then the second today (on amazon). Great site.

Can add me to the sc2 list: Kelsin.935
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 02 March 2011, 21:50:58
Quote from: Qwerty;303845
Are you poopfeast420?

Will you sign my keyboard?


nah, poopfeast420 was my inspiration early in season 2 though. I can't remember all my names, but I was SlayerSBoneR, MichaelGrackson (supposedly Day[9] mentioned this one in a state of the game podcast or something), MikeHawk420, TSL_Drugdealer, BigBaDonk420 + some other ones with 420 in them. I stopped in season 3 though because everyone and their little brother was doing it. Plus it's not the same now that it's John doing the interviews, since he was in on it.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Wed, 02 March 2011, 22:30:18
Quote from: Kelsin;303872
I found this site while looking for keyboards for sc2. Bought my first filco in the classifieds and then the second today (on amazon). Great site.

Can add me to the sc2 list: Kelsin.935


List has been updated.

Again, if you aren't on the list, please let me know. I'm kind of in and out of here at the moment and just a lot going on that has pulled my interest from SC. But I would like to make sure I am keeping everything updated so everyone can find each other and so on.

I also really need to invest in a season ticket so I can watch more of these matches; body simply cannot take staying up late often to watch these games right now.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Thu, 03 March 2011, 01:57:44
GSL Code S Round of 16 tonight!  2310 HST, your time may vary.

Match 1
Set 1: oGsMC (P) < Terminus RE > ZeNEXByun (T)
Set 2: oGsMC < Xel'Naga Caverns > ZeNEXByun
Set 3: oGsMC < Tal'Darim Altar > ZeNEXByun

Match 2
Set 1: Liquid'Jinro (T) < Metalopolis > HongUnPrime.WE (P)
Set 2: Liquid'Jinro < Tal'Darim Altar > HongUnPrime.WE
Set 3: Liquid'Jinro < Xel'Naga Caverns > HongUnPrime.WE

Match 3
Set 1: ST.July (Z) < Xel'Naga Caverns > TSL.Clide (T)
Set 2: ST.July < Crevasse > TSL.Clide
Set 3: ST.July < Scrap Station > TSL.Clide

Match 4
Set 1: CheckPrime.WE (Z) < Shakuras Plateau > oGsNaDa (T)
Set 2: CheckPrime.WE < Crossfire SE > oGsNaDa
Set 3: CheckPrime.WE < Crevasse > oGsNaDa

So many of my favorites fighting tonight!  Definitely cheering for MC, as he is my Protoss hero.  In my honest opinion, it's either Jinro or MC winning the entire tournament.  Both are playing very well right now.  It's too bad that both Jinro and MC are on the same side of the bracket; I would have loved to see a third GSL match between them in the finals.

On the other side of the bracket, Nada seems to be the favorite out of everyone else left.  He's been performing the best out of the eight on his side of the draw.  But as we have seen this season, previous successes in the GSL mean absolutely nothing in March's event.

Picks to win: MC, Jinro, Clide, Nada
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Thu, 03 March 2011, 02:43:00
So, "funny" thing happened to me today in 2v2.  I had ~44 marines in a vortex.  The opponent had 3 hellions in it, also.  When the vortex expired, my marines instantly died.  It was a little upsetting, but I don't take team games too seriously, so it's okay!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Thu, 03 March 2011, 03:40:55
IEM Quarterfinals going on as well!

(But who's going to watch that right now when you have the best players in the world fighting on GSL?)

2230 HST
EG.IdrA (Z) vs ST.Squirtle (P)

0045 HST
FXOmOOnGLaDe (Z) vs. mouz.Morrow (Z)

Both matches are best of five.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Thu, 03 March 2011, 05:52:46
It is nice to live in a strange time zone, since GSL live is on when I wake up in the morning.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Thu, 03 March 2011, 10:01:58
Quote from: Daniel Beaver;304067
It is nice to live in a strange time zone, since GSL live is on when I wake up in the morning.


Same, this is awesome.

Also, regarding Blizz setting up special servers for the GSL, I'd say it's even more embarassing with disconnects.
Do they do that for IEM as well? Because I've seen disconnects there, too.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Thu, 03 March 2011, 10:27:18
They need a LAN option. Seriously. This "everything through B.Net" system is stupid.

Are they just afraid of piracy or something? That seems like a bizarre paranoia, given how SC1 sold (and still sells) like hotcakes despite being easily pirated.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Thu, 03 March 2011, 10:32:38
Removing LAN to fight piracy is stupid. Everyone knows pirates will find a way around most anti-pirating measures. Haven't really heard of anything that's worked so far. Only thing that will put people off pirating is making it a hell to install, like GTA4. Gamespy comrade and all that jazz, but that makes it a hell for those who pay for it as well.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Thu, 03 March 2011, 14:16:27
Quote from: sawedust;304041
IEM Quarterfinals going on as well!

(But who's going to watch that right now when you have the best players in the world fighting on GSL?)

2230 HST
EG.IdrA (Z) vs ST.Squirtle (P)

0045 HST
FXOmOOnGLaDe (Z) vs. mouz.Morrow (Z)

Both matches are best of five.


IEM is officially ruined by the koreans, all 3 making to the top 4 lol.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Thu, 03 March 2011, 14:50:22
Quote from: manfaux;304416
IEM is officially ruined by the koreans, all 3 making to the top 4 lol.


Ruining it?

Naw.

Showing the world that even third-tier Korean SC2 players (not even in Code A) are better than top-tier foreign players?

Hell yeah.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: wongster on Thu, 03 March 2011, 17:06:00
It's ridiculous how good Korean players are.

How's the Filco treating you in SC2, sawedust?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Thu, 03 March 2011, 18:05:24
I've also noticed that Koreans are more prone to cheese tactics compared to Euro players, I might be wrong though as I don't have time to watch all the tournaments etc.
But to me it seems like a Korean BO3 is like this; 1. game is safe, next two cheese. Rarely see European players go stuff like one base Roach.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Thu, 03 March 2011, 18:33:53
Quote from: wongster;304532
It's ridiculous how good Korean players are.

How's the Filco treating you in SC2, sawedust?


It's amazing.  In SC2, out of SC2, just typing, it's a joy.  Absolutely recommend a mechanical keyboard for anyone who really cares about comfort and performance.  Only thing is it's a little loud at night when everyone's sleeping.  I still tend to bottom out during games, but outside of it I've trained myself to thread lightly (har har).

Quote from: vun;304578
I've also noticed that Koreans are more prone to cheese tactics compared to Euro players, I might be wrong though as I don't have time to watch all the tournaments etc.
But to me it seems like a Korean BO3 is like this; 1. game is safe, next two cheese. Rarely see European players go stuff like one base Roach.


If you watch a lot of the VODs, historically those who play standard do not get very far in the GSL.  Standard works well on ladder and what not, but there are different strategies to be had in a BoX series.

Mental warfare, throwing your opponent off his game, these are all things that Korean players take into account.

As we've seen from IEM the three Korean players who aren't even in Code A beat all the highly acclaimed western players like QXC, IdrA, Morrow, WhiteRa, etc.  They don't need to resort to cheese to beat them, they can play regular and just ROFLstomp due to their greater talent and skill level.

But in Korea where standard isn't good enough because everyone knows how to counter standard play, you have to come up new tactics and gimmicks.

Imagine losing to something like a roach bust in game one of a Bo3.  You're one game behind and to think that you lost against something so cheesy can and may put you on tilt.  This little brain ninja action may or may not hinder your ability to play well in the next game, which decides your fate in the tournament.

Thus the reason why we see more cheesy play in Korea than in other places.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: TechWonV on Thu, 03 March 2011, 19:26:33
this is true
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Thu, 03 March 2011, 20:15:26
I can see the reasoning behind it, it's pretty solid actually.
I'm just speculating what impact it has on the difference between EU and Korea. Seems like the fact that they take StarCraft dead serious has a lot to say, I think someone said that to be able to compete with Koreans you had to be there. Which is probably part of the reason why IdrA was able to compete with them, think he moved back to the states recently though.

I'd say that if European players, and foreigners in general, wanted to raise themselves up to Korean level they need things like proper team with player housing where all the players either live together or at least spend a lot of time together practicing.
Small problem though, as far as I know that isn't going to work out financially in the long run. If there were a huge SC2 fanbase and dedicated TV channels we probably could, but it's not a big enough deal for that to become a reality as it is now.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Thu, 03 March 2011, 21:21:33
Quote from: vun;304652
I can see the reasoning behind it, it's pretty solid actually.
I'm just speculating what impact it has on the difference between EU and Korea. Seems like the fact that they take StarCraft dead serious has a lot to say, I think someone said that to be able to compete with Koreans you had to be there. Which is probably part of the reason why IdrA was able to compete with them, think he moved back to the states recently though.

I'd say that if European players, and foreigners in general, wanted to raise themselves up to Korean level they need things like proper team with player housing where all the players either live together or at least spend a lot of time together practicing.
Small problem though, as far as I know that isn't going to work out financially in the long run. If there were a huge SC2 fanbase and dedicated TV channels we probably could, but it's not a big enough deal for that to become a reality as it is now.

I think eating kimchi has a lot to do with being good at starcraft, I went to a local Asian supermarket and picked up some of those bottled kimchi's.

Now I eat a little bit of kimchi every night as an appetizer before dinner, and got promoted to Masters in no time!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Thu, 03 March 2011, 21:51:48
So basically you just need to stuff yourself with kimchi and you're golden?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Thu, 03 March 2011, 23:43:34
For the kimchi, when I was in college I got much better at Broodwar when I would spend some Friday nights at the Korean foreign exchange students' apartment eating kimchi and playing with them.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Fri, 04 March 2011, 03:18:43
GSL Code A is on!  2310 HST start time, please adjust for your own time zone.

TSL_Rain (T) vs. ZeNEXJjun aka Destination (T)
SlayerSAlicia (P) vs. MvPNoblesse aka Cute (T)
oGsSuperNoVa (T) vs. TSL_aLive (T)
SlayerS_Jjob aka M (T) vs. TSL_Killer aka Sangho(P)

So maaaany aliases tonight.

Winners of all four matches get to play in the Up and Down matches to try and get into Code S.  Gonna be really tough this season when you look at all of the top-level names who have unfortunately been relegated to playing for Code S status.

Picks: Rain, Alicia, aLive, and Sangho.  Really wish M and Sangho were playing other people, I really like both of them.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Fri, 04 March 2011, 03:47:33
IEM Semifinals will be on later!  0045 HST start time, please adjust for your own time zone.  All matches are best of five.

0045 HST
FOXMoon (Z) vs. ST_Squirtle (P)

0430 HST
FXOmOOnGLaDe (Z) vs. ST_Ace (P)

Two PvZs coming up!  Supposedly easy mode for Protoss as once they make it to the mid-game, Toss can just play with a deathball and 1a move for the win.  Perhaps we'll see some archon toilets as well? :)

Cheering for both Squirtle and Ace for a PvP final!

EDIT:  The winner of the IEM World Championship takes IdrA's spot in the GSL Up and Down match for a shot at making it to Code S.  What's great about it is no matter what, the person who wins the IEM gains a Code A spot.

All four of them lost in the first round of their Code A matches, so it's awesome for one of them to earn a spot with a tournament win.

Source. (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=198288¤tpage=29#578)  WARNING: Spoilers for GSL Code A included.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Fri, 04 March 2011, 23:07:58
GSL Code S is on!  Early start tonight, we begin at 1910 HST.  Please adjust for your own time zone.  All matches are best of three.

Match 1
Set 1: NSH.San (P) < Scrap Station > oGsTheWinD (Z)
Set 2: NSH.San < Tal'Darim Altar > oGsTheWinD
Set 3: NSH.San < Xel'Naga Caverns > oGsTheWinD

Match 2
Set 1: TSL.Trickster (P) < Tal'Darim Altar > sCfOu (T)
Set 2: TSL.Trickster < Terminus RE > sCfOu
Set 3: TSL.Trickster < Scrap Station > sCfOu

Match 3
Set 1: oGsEnsnare (T) < Terminus RE > FOXLyn (T)
Set 2: oGsEnsnare < Shakuras Plateau > FOXLyn
Set 3: oGsEnsnare < Metalopolis > FOXLyn

Match 4
Set 1: anyproPrime.WE (P) < Terminus RE > ZeNEXKyrix (Z)
Set 2: anyproPrime.WE < Shakuras Plateau > ZeNEXKyrix
Set 3: anyproPrime.WE < Tal'Darim Altar > ZeNEXKyrix

Protoss players have been stomping Terrans easily in both Code S and Code A this season, so I expect Trickster to move on over sCfOu based on that fact.  sC is a very good player though, could he be the first Terran to win a TvP this season?

San is also fighting!  His amazing play against Nestea in the round-robin section made him a player to cheer for the rest of the tournament.  Hopefully he can pull a win out over TheWinD and move on!

As for the other games, I'm cheering for Ensnare and anypro.  Don't really care who wins in those matchups.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Sat, 05 March 2011, 00:14:34
SadZenith is going to win this GSL.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Sun, 06 March 2011, 21:55:04
GSL Code A will be on tonight!  Start time is slated for 2310 HST, please adjust for your own time zone.  All matches will be best of three.

IMLoSirA (Z) vs. Liquid`HuK (P)
ST.Virus (T) vs. LeenockfOu (Z)
TSL_Rain (T) vs. SlayerSAlicia (P)
oGsSuperNoVa (T) vs. TSL_Killer (P)

All eight players will be moving on to the up and down matches for Code S, which means we may see a lot of new faces this upcoming season!  Or maybe not, now that I realize we have ballers like MVP, MKP, BoxeR, Fruitdealer, etc. in the up and down matches too.

Cheering for all the Protoss players tonight, and Leenock in his match against Virus.  Leenock is really a Code S player IMO, just had everyone picking on him in the up and down match last season alongside nerves and age.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Mon, 07 March 2011, 11:29:28
Today's Code A was kinda boring, expected better games from TSL Rain :(
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: duq on Mon, 07 March 2011, 11:34:51
TSL_Rain is really flopping as of late, even at cheese...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Mon, 07 March 2011, 16:13:29
Quote from: manfaux;306917
Today's Code A was kinda boring, expected better games from TSL Rain :(


Quote from: duq;306919
TSL_Rain is really flopping as of late, even at cheese...


I ended up missing the first three matches of the night due to something coming up.  I thought I would be able to catch at least two full matches, maybe two and a half but I guess with all the easy sweeps I missed out on a lot of good action. :(

Rain's always been known as a cheeser, hence his negative reputation from GSL3 and onward.  Cheese can only get you so far as a player.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Tue, 08 March 2011, 00:42:46
If there was ever a night to watch the GSL Code S tournament, tonight would be that night.  Games start at 2310 HST, please adjust for your time zone.

GSL Code S Round of 8
Best of 5 series

oGsMC (P) vs. HongUnPrime.WE (P)
ST_July (Z) vs. oGsNaDa (T)

Anyone feeling the nostalgia of Nada and July? :D :D :D

Going with MC and Nada tonight, despite July's amazing ZvT record in the GSL thus far.  Sure his two wins against IMMVP may have been cheesy, but outside of that he's still 6-1 in ZvT matches.

Plus I want to see those Razer headset lights burn out with Nada's crazy APM!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: joshuadreed on Tue, 08 March 2011, 01:05:48
how do i watch this?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Tue, 08 March 2011, 01:30:05
http://gomtv.net
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hate on Tue, 08 March 2011, 02:52:48
if anyone if unfamiliar with tornado terran nada or the god of war july i recommend watching
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lM4qlbTos8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUGTSELKYbA

so much nostalgia ...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Tue, 08 March 2011, 04:56:50
Game 2 of MC vs. HongUniden is one that will forever change how the Starcraft world views PvP.

Nuff said.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Tue, 08 March 2011, 21:03:06
Quote from: sawedust;307478
Game 2 of MC vs. HongUniden is one that will forever change how the Starcraft world views PvP.

Nuff said.


as far as I see it's still just bunch of 4 gates...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Tue, 08 March 2011, 22:39:36
Quote from: manfaux;308207
as far as I see it's still just bunch of 4 gates...


At least it was exciting for once!  Had to question the loser's thinking on that one, he had an easy win.  If the loser wanted to go for the win, he should have went double assimilator instead of one pylon. :confused:
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 09 March 2011, 01:44:56
GSL Code A Finals on tonight! 2310 HST, please adjust for your time zone.  All matches are best of three.  Games will be casted by DoA and KellyMilkies.

IMLoSirA (Z) vs. LeenockfOu (Z)
SlayerSAlicia (P) vs. oGsSuperNoVa (T)

Leenock needs to get back into Code S, I think he was unfairly singled out for the up and down matches last season. His dominant play so far shows that he's easily deserving of going back. With that said I think he wins over Losira.

For the second match, Toss players have been cruising through the GSL when going up against Terrans with very few exceptions. For that reason and based on Alicia's play in his past few matches, I'd say he takes it over Supernova.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Wed, 09 March 2011, 01:57:10
Quote from: sawedust;308242
At least it was exciting for once!  Had to question the loser's thinking on that one, he had an easy win.  If the loser wanted to go for the win, he should have went double assimilator instead of one pylon. :confused:


if you are talking about the Xel naga cavern's game, HongUn had 350 minerals and a probe left after his base was wiped out, so he could've warped bunch of stuff everywhere on the map, assimilator being the best choice of course. He probably panicked.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Wed, 09 March 2011, 04:16:26
Quote from: manfaux;308313
if you are talking about the Xel naga cavern's game, HongUn had 350 minerals and a probe left after his base was wiped out, so he could've warped bunch of stuff everywhere on the map, assimilator being the best choice of course. He probably panicked.


Brings back memories of Uniden.

Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Wed, 09 March 2011, 08:28:32
Day[9]: He's trying to go for the kill, but he's gonna get blocked by Uniden! Uniden does make the block! Uniden... Oh my god Uniden's in a slightly better position, he's going to have a bigger concave. This means that Uniden will be able to win the battle, but his opponent has a lot of speed zealots, he needs to re-position that properly, he needs to be very careful how he does, he's gonna back up... no don't do that Uniden! Uniden no.. nooo Uniden, he's gonna kill your pylon... UUUNIDEEEN!!!



So classic. We need more funday mondays.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Satisfaktion on Wed, 09 March 2011, 12:34:52
Satisfaktion.885

Plat Brotoss, even though I'm probably Diamond material, I just haven't played much ladder since Masters League came out.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: wongster on Wed, 09 March 2011, 17:25:37
Oh Uniden. I remember that Daily and the subsequent lawl-fest I had watching that. I agree that we need more Funday Mondays.

I often wonder if Uniden is even aware of his popularity due to that game.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Thu, 10 March 2011, 03:51:43
GSL Code S Round of 8, Day 2 is under way!

Two Protoss versus Terran games tonight.

NSH_San (P) vs. sCfOu (T)
AnyproPrime.WE (P) vs. FOXLyn (T)

Cheering for San due to the whole underdog story that he has.  Cheering for Lyn in the other game as I don't want to see a potential PvP final :(
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Satisfaktion on Thu, 10 March 2011, 10:28:54
I've never heard of NSH, who are they?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Carefoot on Thu, 10 March 2011, 11:20:47
I competed in the preliminaries of Season 3/4.   I miss Korea.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Thu, 10 March 2011, 11:44:49
Quote from: sawedust;308973

Cheering for San due to the whole underdog story that he has.  Cheering for Lyn in the other game as I don't want to see a potential PvP final :(


Yeah, it is a crazy turn around. Though I am seeing more sloppiness in his play, at least at points last night.

Quote from: Carefoot;309179
I competed in the preliminaries of Season 3/4.   I miss Korea.


Yes, we know. Along with creating the creepiest music video ever.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Carefoot on Thu, 10 March 2011, 11:50:04
Quote from: wongster;308742
Oh Uniden. I remember that Daily and the subsequent lawl-fest I had watching that. I agree that we need more Funday Mondays.

I often wonder if Uniden is even aware of his popularity due to that game.


He streams on TL so yes.

Quote from: Azuremen;309203
Yeah, it is a crazy turn around. Though I am seeing more sloppiness in his play, at least at points last night.



Yes, we know. Along with creating the creepiest music video ever.


You'll come to appreciate it more and more as you emerge from the closet.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Thu, 10 March 2011, 16:39:35
Quote from: manfaux;305365
sadzenith is going to win this gsl.


qft!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: duq on Sun, 13 March 2011, 15:29:11
Any body hear about blizzard splitting the ladder for the next installment? Pretty lame IMO.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Sun, 13 March 2011, 15:37:01
Quote from: duq;311137
Any body hear about blizzard splitting the ladder for the next installment? Pretty lame IMO.


Yeah, read about that and I can't see any good reason for it.
Can't say I like the direction Blizzard is taking with SC2.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Fwiffo on Sun, 13 March 2011, 15:50:12
Splitting the ladder? So, like people with the expansion are on a different ladder than people without? I guess that makes sense if they introduce new units to multiplayer or something.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: duq on Sun, 13 March 2011, 15:59:47
Quote from: Fwiffo;311161
Splitting the ladder? So, like people with the expansion are on a different ladder than people without? I guess that makes sense if they introduce new units to multiplayer or something.

Yeah... It will divide the community though. Also, I feel like it not really being an "expansion" any more but rather a whole new community.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Sun, 13 March 2011, 16:32:10
Don't they have to split the ladder out of necessity? Besides, any serious players are going to buy the expansions.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: duq on Sun, 13 March 2011, 16:43:52
Quote from: Daniel Beaver;311208
Don't they have to split the ladder out of necessity? Besides, any serious players are going to buy the expansions.

True. I guess it would require an upgrade by everyone that does not want to purchase the expansion otherwise.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Sun, 13 March 2011, 16:58:36
Quote from: vun;311143
Yeah, read about that and I can't see any good reason for it.
Can't say I like the direction Blizzard is taking with SC2.


that's what they've been doing for the past ten years, with the expansion out the multilayer would be entirely different, a separate ladder is necessary.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Sun, 13 March 2011, 17:03:22
Hmm.. True. Guess I didn't take that into consideration. But I'm curious about the old ladder then, since I'd assume a lot of the people who play ladder care enough to buy the expansion.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Mon, 14 March 2011, 16:54:42
They should split the ladder.  There will be new units.

They should NOT, however, try to convince me that adding some models and triggered maps means a "new game" worthy of "new game" price.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: duq on Mon, 14 March 2011, 19:31:35
Quote from: AndrewZorn;311717
They should split the ladder.  There will be new units.

They should NOT, however, try to convince me that adding some models and triggered maps means a "new game" worthy of "new game" price.

Yah! This was my previous intention when I posted... I guess there would be more campaign to play, I just can't see a justification if they make it full price.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sinani206 on Wed, 16 March 2011, 00:51:21
Hi people, add me to the list:
Sinani 145
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: XiP on Fri, 18 March 2011, 17:44:25
XiP.893
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Sat, 19 March 2011, 19:02:44
I really think they need to stop putting people in Masters before they play 100 games, but that might just be me.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: wongster on Fri, 25 March 2011, 16:42:45
TSL3 continues this weekend! Woot!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: cerhem293 on Fri, 25 March 2011, 21:42:33
Idra fighting!! Loved the TSL interview he gave
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: manfaux on Sat, 26 March 2011, 00:54:20
(http://img1.gamemeca.com/news_img_data/201103/et_gstl_110324_img_13.jpg)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: strum4h on Sat, 26 March 2011, 03:38:30
add me to the list - strum4h. I would love to play some team games with you guys. I am probably going to be really rusty though. I have a bonus pool of like 4k lol.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: NeverDie on Sat, 26 March 2011, 03:59:37
NeverDie.804  I'm down for a 1v1 whenever I'm online


Quote from: strum4h;318841
add me to the list - strum4h. I would love to play some team games with you guys. I am probably going to be really rusty though. I have a bonus pool of like 4k lol.

Also you need to add in your character code bro
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: DeltaGunner on Sun, 27 March 2011, 15:27:00
I leeched SC II but im gonna buy when im not playing Crysis II anymore.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Sun, 27 March 2011, 16:28:37
Quote from: Azuremen;314547
I really think they need to stop putting people in Masters before they play 100 games, but that might just be me.
How come?

After my 8th 1v1, I already started getting matched up against masters.  If you're already ranked in other leagues, I believe they'll use MMR from those leagues for your first placement matches.  I got matched up against a diamond in my first 1v1.  If I'm already winning consistently against masters, 100 games seems overkill.  Personally, I think if someone goes > 50% against masters over 30-40 games, that's reliable enough for me.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Sun, 27 March 2011, 19:12:00
TSL 3 Ro32 ended today, and it was a blast.  On IDra vs Cruncher, I will only say :)

We need a spoiler tag...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Sun, 27 March 2011, 19:12:33
Quote from: Daniel Beaver;319788
TSL 3 Ro32 ended today, and it was a blast.  On IDra vs Cruncher, I will only say :)

We need a spoiler tag...

Game 2 was beastly. Loved it.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Mon, 28 March 2011, 13:51:44
Quote from: Daniel Beaver;319788
TSL 3 Ro32 ended today, and it was a blast.  On IDra vs Cruncher, I will only say :)

We need a spoiler tag...
If you're on TL, take a look at the liquibet stats for that game.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Mon, 28 March 2011, 14:23:04
Quote from: Crypt;320182
If you're on TL, take a look at the liquibet stats for that game.

How does one see liquibets for past games? TL's busy interface mystifies me sometimes.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Mon, 28 March 2011, 15:26:02
lmao 7 votes wrong in a row for SC2 liquibet, 7 votes right in a row for BW liquibet... guess which game I've been watching almost exclusively recently. Go SKT1! Also, go Team USA in SC2 ;)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Lpb45 on Mon, 28 March 2011, 21:01:10
Lpb ingame
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Tue, 29 March 2011, 10:44:51
Quote from: Daniel Beaver;320197
How does one see liquibets for past games? TL's busy interface mystifies me sometimes.
Yeah, I'm new to it as well.  For each game, there's an icon on the left side that sorta looks like a "comments" button.  If you click it, you'll see the vote distribution as well as comments about the match.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: krazymunky on Tue, 29 March 2011, 12:42:54
world champions team matches was pretty exciting. hopefully a foreigner can maybe win the 1v1 tournament!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Chojo31 on Tue, 29 March 2011, 13:44:55
I play it!

chojo.488
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Wed, 30 March 2011, 04:46:48
Quote from: Crypt;319719
How come?

After my 8th 1v1, I already started getting matched up against masters.  If you're already ranked in other leagues, I believe they'll use MMR from those leagues for your first placement matches.  I got matched up against a diamond in my first 1v1.  If I'm already winning consistently against masters, 100 games seems overkill.  Personally, I think if someone goes > 50% against masters over 30-40 games, that's reliable enough for me.

I dunno. I have found many players in Masters that just have 1 very aggressive build or some cheese that works for them. Perhaps I think Masters should just be more selective even, I dunno. Just tired of seeing 1 base for 15 minutes and crap like that.

Fairly stoked for the ladder reset, played about 20 games today with some success. Some.

Also updated the player list, adding in links to SC2ranks profiles where I could. I am still assuming players are on North America unless they state otherwise in the post with their info.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Wed, 30 March 2011, 12:07:11
Quote from: Azuremen;321253
I dunno. I have found many players in Masters that just have 1 very aggressive build or some cheese that works for them. Perhaps I think Masters should just be more selective even, I dunno. Just tired of seeing 1 base for 15 minutes and crap like that.
I think it's the nature of the game and the probabilistic chance of cheese/all ins working and not the number of games.  Just take a look at CombatEX's profile.  He's one of the top grandmasters, and he cheeses/all ins every game that I've seen.

I'm in master league, and I felt like it was easy to get into (but I've had many years of BW experience.)  But, I have a ton of friends "stuck" in high diamond for quite some time where I'm sure they do not feel like master league is not selective enough.  Perhaps it's human nature or a personality thing, though...every time I make it into a gaming performance goal, I feel a little disappointed because there's nothing as significant left to work for.  And, once I've reached that level of play, the play just seems "normal" to me and nothing special.  It's like when my friends lose and feel like they're terrible players, but according to b.net, they're in the top 5% of players.  So just look at 1000 games played bronzes and compare the differences, I guess...but I suspect those players might be 12 year olds >_>.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Wed, 30 March 2011, 12:46:24
I know some Bronze players that are my age (25) that just cannot get their head around the game. But they usually have minimal RTS experience, and have a ton of trouble multi-tasking in the game.

I myself had a lot of RTS experience, but never anything serious. I wasn't even aware of iCCup till just 2 years ago, and never played on it. And I am one of those players sitting in high diamond more or less, though I think a lot of that has to do with basically not playing on ladder for months on end before and after they introduced Master's league.

But I've played mid-Masters players that will, say, drop 32 marines at my third (one with rocks) on Delta and have them get destroyed by Colossi, doing almost no damage. And then that player pushes my front door with almost half the supply and just gets destroyed. Though I guess it is just the game evolving, since for months after release it was a lot of 1 base heavy play, where an expansion was delayed for a while. Now it seems to be moving towards 2 base play with a lot of people being awkward on taking a third.

And the rankings don't mean that much in my mind, since they aren't that selective. Being in GrandMaster will mean something though when they open it up, being only the top 200 players. But the skill gap in Masters is just hilarious, much like the difference between a Bronze player and a Diamond player.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Wed, 30 March 2011, 13:37:26
I'm not sure if you misread what I said or not.  CombatEX would be a rank 2 grandmaster or something through 1 base/cheese play, as in #2 in the north american top 200 if my memory serves me correctly.  That's why I'm saying that having over 100 games to be placed in master won't do anything to remove 1 base/cheese players from being high ranked.  Strategies just have to be effective more than 50% of the time to get your MMR increasing.

I can't comment too much on skill gaps because that's difficult to quantify.  But, I can definitely say that being master league doesn't mean you have the game figured out.  I always try to do things that probably don't work (possibly stupid things) in order to learn whether they actually don't work or not.

As far as the basing, my impression is getting a fast 3rd base is quickly becoming standard in some matchups due to the changes affecting early game aggression/usefulness of bio late game.  But, I'm also biased because I go for fast expo in every game, and they probably try to double expand to exploit my early game passiveness.  Aside from that, my other exposure to the game is GSL, and GSL maps are huge and significantly weaken 1-2 base timing attacks.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: PerfectError on Sun, 03 April 2011, 02:49:16
i'm pretty new here but id love to play a few games with you guys, I'm in the platinum league but I'm so rusty and out of the game i'm prolly gold level. i want to have some regular people to play with to improve my game play and have fun with people.

Perfecterror.170
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: DejaHu on Mon, 04 April 2011, 17:07:05
DejaHu.713
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: qvindtar on Mon, 04 April 2011, 20:34:43
Qvindtar.277 - gold level working my way up. Always looking for sparring partners (or some good advice).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Nautilus on Tue, 05 April 2011, 15:54:32
Sign me up! Nautilus (267) (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/2625912/1/Nautilus/)

As you can see, I am a total noob at the moment, but slowly learning through customs with some friends and watching games online. I should brave the ladder soon, though!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hfcobra on Wed, 06 April 2011, 00:16:11
hey, my name is CobR (561) (http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/293247/1/CobR/)

SC2 is my first RTS and so far I am no good lol.  About 50 games played total and I was top 5ish in Bronze before I stopped playing for a while.  I am going to start playing again though to get better at a great game!

Add me if you are looking to teach a bad player something or if you want someone who is as bad as you to practice with lol.    :D

EDIT: Since the stat reset I only have 1 win, but have not really played.   :P
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Valeranth on Wed, 06 April 2011, 07:48:44
brandon.1823

pretty much still a noob at the game. But its getting to be the small things. right now im not on much with school and work but that should all change pretty soon. :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Nautilus on Wed, 06 April 2011, 20:16:03
Quote from: Valeranth;325504
brandon.1823

pretty much still a noob at the game. But its getting to be the small things. right now im not on much with school and work but that should all change pretty soon. :)


Yeah, same.

Also, your handle is the first I have seen with more than 3 numbers. Congrats. :tongue:
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hfcobra on Wed, 06 April 2011, 20:59:39
Quote from: Nautilus;325920
Yeah, same.

Also, your handle is the first I have seen with more than 3 numbers. Congrats. :tongue:


i think that they number you based on how many people are out there with the same name and the order that you pick that name.  I am probably wrong, but it's just a theory after all.   :P
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Nautilus on Wed, 06 April 2011, 23:20:20
Quote from: hfcobra;325937
i think that they number you based on how many people are out there with the same name and the order that you pick that name.  I am probably wrong, but it's just a theory after all.   :P


Yeah, sounds about right. And I am guessing "brandon" is much more popular than "Nautius" hahaha.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: jdreamer on Fri, 08 April 2011, 19:39:36
Sorry forgot to notice everyone. I changed my IGN from jdreamer to DreameR (825). Please update the list. Cheers.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Sun, 10 April 2011, 05:38:13
Bisu > Flash
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vun on Sun, 10 April 2011, 11:14:02
Quote from: speakeasy;327821
Bisu > Flash


I agree, Bisu is hotter than Flash.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Sun, 10 April 2011, 16:57:28
Indeed, he is a handsome man. I wish my true SKT man crush Fantasy got to play, but I'll take a 3-kill by an SKT zerg anyday.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: .XL on Sun, 10 April 2011, 17:45:57
So...what is that number after people's names and how do we find it? (getting back into SC2 after a 4 month hiatus)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Sun, 10 April 2011, 18:29:00
The number is the character code, click add friends in the bottom right of the main menu
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: .XL on Sun, 10 April 2011, 19:08:52
According to SC2ranks.com, I do not exist. Hmmm
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: shako on Tue, 12 April 2011, 18:46:06
As a new member browsing the forums on Geekhack, I noticed this thread, which I approve of very much! :) I'm a huge Starcraft 2 fan and play quite often. I'm a Diamond terran player hopefully getting masters league soon! Can play the two other races to diamond level aswell - maybe not as crisp though!
If anyone would like to practice or even needs help with builds I'd be happy to help you try and get out of lower leagues.

Shako.512 is my ID and I play on EU Servers.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: .XL on Tue, 12 April 2011, 19:34:21
Quote from: shako;329603
As a new member browsing the forums on Geekhack, I noticed this thread, which I approve of very much! :) I'm a huge Starcraft 2 fan and play quite often. I'm a Diamond terran player hopefully getting masters league soon! Can play the two other races to diamond level aswell - maybe not as crisp though!
If anyone would like to practice or even needs help with builds I'd be happy to help you try and get out of lower leagues.

Shako.512 is my ID.


I'll take you up on this! Next week though, once I get some schoolwork out of the way.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: shako on Tue, 12 April 2011, 19:55:16
@.XL forgot I ment to mention that I'm on EU Servers, I'm guessing your NA since your in Wa D.C?:(
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: .XL on Tue, 12 April 2011, 20:05:50
Quote from: shako;329700
@.XL forgot I ment to mention that I'm on EU Servers, I'm guessing your NA since your in Wa D.C?:(


Yeah :/ I've found another 'coach' buuttt I'd greatly benefit from some strats, build orders, and unit comps if you don't mind!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: kektr0city on Wed, 13 April 2011, 08:46:09
anybody watch the first round of the NASL yesterday?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: shako on Wed, 13 April 2011, 09:17:58
Yup! I was hoping sj.Artosis was going to do better! Totally surprised with the Kikwikaki outcome, thought he'd smash his opponents. What league are you in .XL?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: .XL on Wed, 13 April 2011, 11:18:45
Quote from: shako;329976
Yup! I was hoping sj.Artosis was going to do better! Totally surprised with the Kikwikaki outcome, thought he'd smash his opponents. What league are you in .XL?


I only played maybe 20 of the intro matches before giving the account to my friend. He changed the name (damn...when will the paid name change be available?) and played out some matches. Got stuck in Bronze. I got the account back last week and haven't played any online matches, so I don't know what I'd be. Probably bronze or silver though, judging from my intro matches.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Chobopants on Wed, 13 April 2011, 11:45:32
Yeah Artosis disappointed me. Tried to macro too hard, got outmatched. He was lacking confidence to push whenever he was at an advantage. Fun games to watch but made me appreciate the caliber of the GSL even more.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: jdreamer on Sun, 17 April 2011, 18:06:57
Damn after going 20+ unbeaten, I got 15 loses in a row...... T_T
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: godofdeath on Sun, 17 April 2011, 21:35:16
wow played the game on low game looks like krappppppppppppp
gotta get my rig fixed ASAP
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: .XL on Sun, 17 April 2011, 21:47:09
Quote from: godofdeath;332486
wow played the game on low game looks like krappppppppppppp
gotta get my rig fixed ASAP

From what I understand a lot of pros use low settings because it's easier to detect cloaked and burrowed units
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: godofdeath on Sun, 17 April 2011, 21:58:19
Quote from: .XL;332490
From what I understand a lot of pros use low settings because it's easier to detect cloaked and burrowed units

it lookssss way too cartoonish for me
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Chobopants on Mon, 18 April 2011, 01:10:02
Quote from: .XL;332490
From what I understand a lot of pros use low settings because it's easier to detect cloaked and burrowed units

Actually, at pro level, using high settings lets you detect someone's starting location before fully revealing them by noticing the sparkles on the map, this can save valuable seconds in choosing an initial build.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Chobopants on Mon, 18 April 2011, 01:10:50
Also, I played a lot this weekend. Kind of made me angry at the game. It's so standardized in certain builds. I really need to go back to my AMERICAN style of play and be goofy. Beat people with mind games instead of using typical bull**** (FOUR GATE ALL DAY MOTHERFUKCSGIAJGRIOJAERIOGAEJG)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: EverythingIBM on Mon, 18 April 2011, 03:50:33
I might give SC2 a try once I upgrade my "gaming IBM" with two 3D cards in SLI, 8GB of RAM, and so forth... and actually buy the game.
[I did participate in the beta; they totally used the same engine as WC3; hopefully the interface's behaviour changed from the beta as it was fairly clumsy]
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: HaveANiceDay on Mon, 18 April 2011, 11:03:19
It is not the same engine as wc3. People also thought WoW uses the same engine as wc3.
I hope you are not getting SLI and 8GB RAM just for sc2, because that would be a waste.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: .XL on Mon, 18 April 2011, 11:54:59
Get an ATI 5770...it runs SC2 on ultra just fine for me. I've got 8 gigs ram...but not for SC2. I got it just to say I have 8 gigs ram (my roommates build is 6gb)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Valeranth on Mon, 18 April 2011, 12:00:52
Quote from: Nautilus;325920
Yeah, same.

Also, your handle is the first I have seen with more than 3 numbers. Congrats. :tongue:

 
Haha thanks, it just because so many people have the name Brandon that I got 4. Nearly got a free win in CEVO because the other guy though I gave him the wrong code. Think I wound up still beatting the guy though XD

And for the record I have a GTX 550 a still use low settings. It is less for your mind to deal with due to lower object count, also keeps any lag out of the issue when playing... Also I find ultra ot look ugly.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: krull on Mon, 18 April 2011, 16:53:16
Krull.805

Like the above poster i cant stand the game on anything higher than low settings. I don't know why but i don't play as well on ultra. But i will admit marines portraits are catastrophically ugly on low.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: .XL on Mon, 18 April 2011, 17:53:18
Quote from: krull;332979
Krull.805

Like the above poster i cant stand the game on anything higher than low settings. I don't know why but i don't play as well on ultra. But i will admit marines portraits are catastrophically ugly on low.

They should always be catastrophically ugly. They're marines!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: skyblue on Mon, 18 April 2011, 18:29:29
Hey everyone, I'm new to geekhack having just picked up my first mechanical keyboard a few weeks ago.

I'm currently a top 5 diamond player trying to get into master's, if anyone wants some help getting out of the lower leagues I'm willing to see what I can do :). skyblue.775 or PM me.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: keyboardlover on Mon, 18 April 2011, 18:31:23
Nice avatar! GG fan by any chance?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: skyblue on Mon, 18 April 2011, 18:42:32
GG? As in GGGGG baby baby?

Something I say frequently in SC2 by the way.....
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sndstrm on Mon, 18 April 2011, 22:36:33
Quote from: skyblue;333035
Hey everyone, I'm new to geekhack having just picked up my first mechanical keyboard a few weeks ago.

I'm currently a top 5 diamond player trying to get into master's, if anyone wants some help getting out of the lower leagues I'm willing to see what I can do :). skyblue.775 or PM me.

What time zone are you in?  I am in Italy and I have a hard time hooking up with friends back in the States to play but I would def take you up on your offer.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: skyblue on Tue, 19 April 2011, 00:45:57
I'm in Eastern US/Canada. hit me up!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hfcobra on Tue, 19 April 2011, 01:45:31
Hello, just popping in to say hi again.   :P

I have really been improving lately and starcraft has become so much more enjoyable now because of it!  If anyone is looking for someone to play with my name is CobR 561

See you on SC2.   :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sndstrm on Tue, 19 April 2011, 12:28:33
sndstrm 186

Always looking to play with someone, but I suck.  You have been warned.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: circularboxes on Tue, 03 May 2011, 21:52:06
Just received my first mechanical keyboard yesterday, a noppoo choc mini with blacks and happened to stumble upon this thread. Starcraft 2 is ruining my gpa, but what can you do? My name is Bonar.240, feel free to add me and say what's up. I'm not that great, so skyblue maybe i'll take you up on your offer haha. I play on the NA servers. See you guys later!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: brkim1324 on Wed, 04 May 2011, 02:38:01
I play lots of SC2! and.. I am not there obviously, cause I'm new here :(
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Chobopants on Thu, 05 May 2011, 10:46:57
I'm always down to play people. I'm high Diamond trying to break into Masters. It's tough, late game macro is something I never had to learn in WC3 so I'm going through a pretty heavy learning phase right now.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vincewchan on Fri, 06 May 2011, 19:40:58
Hello everyone ~91% w/l ratio team game player.

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/2115775/1/Vitamin/
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Wed, 11 May 2011, 01:26:24
Team games mean almost nothing. Even if your partner is Grandmasters. Why no 1v1? It would be safe to assume you aren't terrible if you are connected with Liquid and oGs players... I just find it odd I guess, since you can get Masters in team games by proxy 2 rax/gate/7 pool every game.

Also, if you want to be added to the list, I need your character code.

I've updated the main list. Seems a lot of people have shown up with an interest in keyboards and SC2 from TL in the past month or so. I'll probably update the first post with links to the key threads, though the only active one is probably the TL key since the Group 3 order is sold out now.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: systemA on Wed, 11 May 2011, 01:57:40
Quote from: Azuremen;344813

Also, if you want to be added to the list, I need your character code.

 
Bubbles.557, masters 1v1, feel free to add me!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vincewchan on Wed, 11 May 2011, 03:49:31
Quote from: Azuremen;344813
Team games mean almost nothing. Even if your partner is Grandmasters. Why no 1v1? It would be safe to assume you aren't terrible if you are connected with Liquid and oGs players... I just find it odd I guess, since you can get Masters in team games by proxy 2 rax/gate/7 pool every game.

Also, if you want to be added to the list, I need your character code.

I've updated the main list. Seems a lot of people have shown up with an interest in keyboards and SC2 from TL in the past month or so. I'll probably update the first post with links to the key threads, though the only active one is probably the TL key since the Group 3 order is sold out now.

Vitamin.613

Team game means nothing eh. I'm watching SeleCT and Optizero climb 2v2 vs #2 2v2 global team (14-3 score) at the moment right now as we speak. There has been ROOT vs EG 2v2 clan wars. Tomorrow will be Dignitas clan wars...

So apparently team games mean nothing but you see top15 grand master players starting to play team games more often... interesting.

I planned on fully committing 1v1s in season2 but I don't have much time to play anymore as you can see my total games played for season2.

I don't cheese or proxy / early pool fyi.

Also, a lot of solo players using production tab hack / drop hack ( PiLLage 69-0 grand master).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Wed, 11 May 2011, 13:35:02
Top players have always messed around in team games. And that is the point - messed around. The EG Masters cup games, and the one last night I saw was basically a Roach Marauder all-in rush.

You played 5 games in Season 1 and stayed in Plat. You've played 300 games this season, but none have been 1v1.

Then you mention hackers and so on. It honestly just comes across as excuses.

And as for team games meaning nothing, I meant almost anyone can get into Masters playing Team games, even if they are silver or gold, provided they get decent team mates.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vincewchan on Wed, 11 May 2011, 13:52:39
Messed around eh. I guess teams that walk away from 4 to 5 figure prize money from 2v2 tournaments are a joke too then.  I guess we all have our opinions.

Excuses? Hmm maybe we can play some 1v1 sometime :)

I also beg to differ about getting to Masters with a Silver/Gold player and I'm about 99.99% sure of this statement. You are really underestimating "team games".
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: SlwDrvr on Wed, 11 May 2011, 15:04:08
Quote from: Azuremen;344813
Team games mean almost nothing. Even if your partner is Grandmasters. Why no 1v1? It would be safe to assume you aren't terrible if you are connected with Liquid and oGs players... I just find it odd I guess, since you can get Masters in team games by proxy 2 rax/gate/7 pool every game.

Also, if you want to be added to the list, I need your character code.

I've updated the main list. Seems a lot of people have shown up with an interest in keyboards and SC2 from TL in the past month or so. I'll probably update the first post with links to the key threads, though the only active one is probably the TL key since the Group 3 order is sold out now.

just because u can get "INTO" masters doesn't mean you are good. Silver/Gold players cannot macro anywhere near the level of Mid Diamond+.

Team games mean nothing? Tell that to ariesto and cubert
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Wed, 11 May 2011, 15:47:23
Quote from: SlwDrvr;345040
just because u can get "INTO" masters doesn't mean you are good. Silver/Gold players cannot macro anywhere near the level of Mid Diamond+.

Team games mean nothing? Tell that to ariesto and cubert

That is my point, poor 1v1 players can get very easily into Masters. You can argue about it all you want but the number of "masters" 2v2 teams and crap I've seen that are gold or so 1v1 is pretty impressive.

As for money being on the line, there is only one tournament I am aware of using team games, and majority of the matches and importance is on 1v1. There is a reason high level team play never caught on in BW, and it isn't even just the fact the game is balanced around 1v1 and not team games. A great deal of the community feels the same way.

Honestly, if you are good, go play the 30 games or so it would take to get into Masters 1v1. Otherwise, claiming to be high masters in team games holds no value if you have zero 1v1 games played.

Gold player 1v1 (http://sc2ranks.com/us/1813368/InitialD), Masters 2v2, Masters 4v4 (92%) win rate
Bronze 1v1 player (http://sc2ranks.com/us/2315214/Anko), Masters 2v2, 4v4.

And this was only with 2 minutes effort.

I'll just make my view clear - boasting about team game win rates is on par with boasting about being an Honors student at an alternative high school
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: systemA on Wed, 11 May 2011, 16:42:36
Quote from: Azuremen;345044
That is my point, poor 1v1 players can get very easily into Masters. You can argue about it all you want but the number of "masters" 2v2 teams and crap I've seen that are gold or so 1v1 is pretty impressive.

As for money being on the line, there is only one tournament I am aware of using team games, and majority of the matches and importance is on 1v1. There is a reason high level team play never caught on in BW, and it isn't even just the fact the game is balanced around 1v1 and not team games. A great deal of the community feels the same way.

Honestly, if you are good, go play the 30 games or so it would take to get into Masters 1v1. Otherwise, claiming to be high masters in team games holds no value if you have zero 1v1 games played.

Gold player 1v1 (http://sc2ranks.com/us/1813368/InitialD), Masters 2v2, Masters 4v4 (92%) win rate
Bronze 1v1 player (http://sc2ranks.com/us/2315214/Anko), Masters 2v2, 4v4.

And this was only with 2 minutes effort.

I'll just make my view clear - boasting about team game win rates is on par with boasting about being an Honors student at an alternative high school

 
Honestly, why do you care?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vincewchan on Wed, 11 May 2011, 17:09:07
Lol, you are too funny. Just because u can get INTO masters for solo doesn't mean you are good either. What's your point here? That I can't get into 1v1 masters?

Master's in team hold no value w/o 1v1 played? lol. People play for different reasons. My goal was achievement points. I don't care about solo ladder.

Also, when have I ever boasted? Sounds like you have an ego problem. You are acting like a Kid.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vincewchan on Wed, 11 May 2011, 17:12:29
Lol, you are too funny. Just because u can get INTO masters for solo doesn't mean you are good either. What's your point here? That I can't get into 1v1 masters?

Master's in team hold no value w/o 1v1 played? lol. I have all achievements excluding solo achievements (which no one has dark voice legitimately).

People play for different reasons. My goal was achievement points. I don't care about solo ladder.

Also, when have I ever boasted?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vincewchan on Wed, 11 May 2011, 21:20:14
Quote from: systemA;345062
Honestly, why do you care?

I agree with you.

I thought I'd share my user name / character code so I can play with some fellow geekhack.org member's with no intention of "boasting" or "bragging" and I get harassed...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sndstrm on Wed, 11 May 2011, 22:36:56
FFA is where real starcraft II is played
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Sat, 14 May 2011, 05:17:30
psh, everyone knows DoTA is the real test of starcraft skill ;)

Betting on Thorzain to win! Naniwa is the safer bet I guess, but I gotta go with the McLovin terran
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Zet on Sun, 15 May 2011, 02:25:05
add me, I play sc2 on na too.

Zet
291
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: krull on Sun, 15 May 2011, 21:47:27
The thorzain vs naniwa series was amazing.  (WARNING SPOILERS!)

Thorzain coming back from a 3-1 deficit to win the series was EPIC!!!!! Watching him hold the 6 warpgate push on Crossfire was probably the best part of the series besides game 7.
I never would have expected him to advance as far as he did, but after the route he took through the TSL he certainly earned the win.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Azuremen on Tue, 17 May 2011, 14:51:27
Quote from: vincewchan;345185
I agree with you.

I thought I'd share my user name / character code so I can play with some fellow geekhack.org member's with no intention of "boasting" or "bragging" and I get harassed...

Sorry, I just tend to see "hello" followed by a win percent as a bit of boasting.

And the number of people that try to write of being genuinely good at the game being XY in team games while bronze in 1v1 is annoying. And I'm a touch competitive and argumentative :p

No hard feelings, eh? :p
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Tue, 17 May 2011, 16:10:07
It's possible for a gold 1v1 player to get carried into master league in team games, even 2v2.  I know because I've done it myself with some friends that are gold.  However, this generally happens after placement matches and not through promotions.  In the first example linked of the gold 1v1 player, his partner is a top 50 grandmaster.  His MMR is so high that even going 3-2 will place them in a master league team.  In the second example, I believe the player is either portrait farming or intentionally losing to play easy games in bronze 1v1 league, but more likely is portrait farming.

As far as team vs 1v1, this is an old topic, but I'd like to put in my 2c.  Team games aren't near anywhere as competitive as 1v1s.  I just started playing 2v2 with my partner and we're already playing top 100-200 teams.  That would never happen in 1v1.  Our builds aren't fleshed out and we still lose to a lot of "dumb" things sometimes.  The reason that team players get a lot of "hate" is because people imagine high ranked team players to be prideful without having correspondingly deserving skill.

Team skill has overlap with 1v1, but there's definitely some skills more emphasized in team games than 1v1 and some skills more emphasized in 1v1 than team games.  However, 1v1 players generally have better mechanics and multitasking, which is more in tune with what people consider to be "skill."  However large that difference is, it would be very hard for me to believe that two true (mmr stable) 1v1 gold players can consistently perform at a master league level in 2v2.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: pitashen on Wed, 18 May 2011, 19:07:44
Quote from: Azuremen;347637
Sorry, I just tend to see "hello" followed by a win percent as a bit of boasting.


 
There are things about those who would avoid playing 1v1. It all boils down to these possible points:

a. They don't handle intense pressure well.
b. They don't want to deal with intense pressures in games (games should be fun).
c. Extreme multitasking is not for them.
d. Etc. (you know what they are if you play enough).

We know them, they most likely know them. There is no need to reinforce the fact and ruin the peaceful atmosphere here.  :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: fullofenergy on Wed, 18 May 2011, 23:14:22
Quote from: vincewchan;344838
Vitamin.613

Team game means nothing eh. I'm watching SeleCT and Optizero climb 2v2 vs #2 2v2 global team (14-3 score) at the moment right now as we speak. There has been ROOT vs EG 2v2 clan wars. Tomorrow will be Dignitas clan wars...

So apparently team games mean nothing but you see top15 grand master players starting to play team games more often... interesting.

I planned on fully committing 1v1s in season2 but I don't have much time to play anymore as you can see my total games played for season2.

I don't cheese or proxy / early pool fyi.

Also, a lot of solo players using production tab hack / drop hack ( PiLLage 69-0 grand master).

 
Apparently your 2v2 teammate Sorcery is a hacker? http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/2522165650

Is it true?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Fri, 20 May 2011, 06:21:12
He got caught hacking and admitted to it, and I think it was mentioned that he was a hacker in DotA as well.  He claims to be reformed, but obviously, those statements don't carry too much weight from cheaters.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=200545
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: HaveANiceDay on Fri, 20 May 2011, 08:27:55
Oh wow, and I hoped that at least at masters level no one would be compelled to cheat.
Blizzard really ****ed up by trusting the client too much. But hey, it's cheaper that way.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sndstrm on Fri, 20 May 2011, 11:13:22
That's how they got to masters level.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: HaveANiceDay on Fri, 20 May 2011, 13:00:15
Quote from: sndstrm;348996
That's how they got to masters level.

Your avatar dude died today.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sndstrm on Fri, 20 May 2011, 13:32:58
Quote from: HaveANiceDay;349034
Your avatar dude died today.

:'(
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: HaveANiceDay on Fri, 20 May 2011, 13:35:02
Crushing souls. It's what I do.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sndstrm on Fri, 20 May 2011, 13:42:49
Macho Man was the Model M of people.  That is all.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crypt on Fri, 20 May 2011, 14:29:13
There are 9500 or so 1v1 masters.  I don't think many of them hack.  There's just a couple high profile ones.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: dannyp on Sat, 28 May 2011, 19:22:47
Hi guys, I'm new here. I'm a player from the 1998 SC & BW days. Never really got into tournament just played on bnet and LAN's for years.

These days I don't spend much time on gaming -- the rest of life seeped in since then. But I do play in my free time, usually a night a week or so (hopefully more this summer).

Feel free to add me. I'm ranked 1v1 Gold but I'm trying to get better. I have more experience playing 2v2, but I want to figure out this 1v1 business soon. I only have a few games under my belt in 1v1. Let me know if you want to do some practicing :D

I forgot to mention, I'm a Protoss player now but I spent most of my 2v2 games on Random. I just noticed my win ratio was higher with Protosss so I switched. I feel like Zerg is my favorite race though, even though it's my lowest win ratio. I wish I could stay a random player, but I feel like I will not be learning all the race matchup combinations as well as a dedicated main.

projectdp 925
http://sc2ranks.com/us/603208/projectdp
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Sat, 28 May 2011, 23:39:10
Cool, I might as well put my name down here too. I actually have 2 accounts. 1 for SEA and one for NA region. I mainly play on the SEA region and have Gold 1v1 there although I've just started to reladder my NA one now for the first time in a few months since I got Silver on there. This is really my first RTS game that I've played. I didn't play SC1, and was mainly into FPS although I did play AOE1 when it was just released way back. I never played that online or anything though, just against the AI.

SEA: Mode#511
NA: Mode#513

If you add me, just message me and say you added me from GeekHack so I know who you are. :P
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: guilleguillaume on Sun, 29 May 2011, 17:08:30
Look what I found!

http://classic.battle.net/window.shtml
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: dannyp on Sun, 29 May 2011, 18:38:39
haha :D nice
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Asp on Sun, 29 May 2011, 18:44:01
Rather than individually add people to friends list where it's easy to lose track of who is who, wouldn't it be better to designate a GeekHack chat channel and use that?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Sun, 29 May 2011, 23:37:13
Quote from: Asp;352943
Rather than individually add people to friends list where it's easy to lose track of who is who, wouldn't it be better to designate a GeekHack chat channel and use that?

That's a pretty good idea actually.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sndstrm on Mon, 30 May 2011, 03:05:56
There is already a geekhack private channel.  Just checked it :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 01 June 2011, 11:22:57
Quote from: guilleguillaume;352914
Look what I found!

http://classic.battle.net/window.shtml

great find Protoss 3 @ 1:46 is my favorite from Broodwar
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: onesie on Thu, 02 June 2011, 19:59:52
DcMLLMist .260
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Zet on Thu, 02 June 2011, 22:34:15
I'll get on the geekhack channel on NA when I login from now on then (:
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Tue, 14 June 2011, 13:10:12
So I tried playing with Grid layout as Toss... wow it's so weird. I was like WHY ISN'T MY A MOVE WORKING?!?!?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Daniel Beaver on Tue, 14 June 2011, 13:21:04
Quote from: speakeasy;360661
So I tried playing with Grid layout as Toss... wow it's so weird. I was like WHY ISN'T MY A MOVE WORKING?!?!?

Grit your teeth and learn it. You'll thank yourself later :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: ethics- on Tue, 14 June 2011, 20:37:05
I like custom keys better.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Tue, 21 June 2011, 12:40:31
Quote from: Daniel Beaver;360665
Grit your teeth and learn it. You'll thank yourself later :)

Is there some way to set it so that UIOP takes place of QWER in Grid? That would ease the transition to Grid for protoss at least.

I was at the WCG NYC Starcraft 2 tournament on Sunday, mostly saw Das, Razer and Steelseries boards (and one DT-35).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Tue, 21 June 2011, 12:41:02
Quote from: Daniel Beaver;360665
Grit your teeth and learn it. You'll thank yourself later :)

 
Is there some way to set it so that UIOP takes place of QWER in Grid? That would ease the transition to Grid for protoss at least.

I was at the WCG NYC Starcraft 2 tournament on Sunday, mostly saw Das, Razer and Steelseries boards (and one DT-35).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: ethics- on Tue, 21 June 2011, 16:53:44
You could always just manually change the keys to UIOP.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: foxer on Wed, 22 June 2011, 17:43:44
Name - Wade Blanshard
Forum username - foxer
Starcraft 2 ID - foxer.560
real.ID - fauxer@live.co.uk
League - Platinum. I've not played SC in a while though because my girlfriend just moved in with me. I used to play customs a lot with diamond people though and majority of the time comfortably beat them.
SC2 ranks link - http://www.sc2ranks.com/eu/2141247/foxer
B.net link - http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/2141247/1/foxer/

I'm from United Kingdom so make sure you add EU to my name on the side. I plan on obtaining a NA account sometime in the future. Don't know when.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: HaveANiceDay on Wed, 22 June 2011, 20:26:31
Quote from: teegangui;365648
Proscar (Finasteride) is an androgen hormone inhibitor used in men to treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) which is swelling of the prostate. This medicine works by lowering the amount of a hormone in your body called dihydrotestosterone or DHT. Reducing this hormone level in your body may help to reduce the swelling of the prostate and reduce the symptoms of BPH.

But will it improve my APM?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Mayor Winters on Thu, 23 June 2011, 08:03:07
Hey fellows! Didnt know there was a SC2 thread in here, Im Winters in the SC2 and ill connect to the channel as soon as I arrive home :P

Add me if you want: Winters.687 and please say Hello :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Sun, 26 June 2011, 22:44:07
I keep forgetting to join the channel when I'm playing on NA. I'll have to try remember to login and save the channel even if I don't play anything later.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Chobopants on Thu, 30 June 2011, 12:16:21
Quote from: Hydroid;368713
I keep forgetting to join the channel when I'm playing on NA. I'll have to try remember to login and save the channel even if I don't play anything later.

Yeah I'll make sure to join geekhack by default as well. Always love having people to train with and my team is almost all West Coast so I don't get as much 1 on 1 training as I'd like.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Chobopants on Thu, 30 June 2011, 12:19:51
Quote from: Daniel Beaver;360665
Grit your teeth and learn it. You'll thank yourself later :)

I actually greatly dislike grid, of course I also play left handed. :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Haes on Thu, 30 June 2011, 13:22:36
Quote from: voltrons*lips;370658
Hey if you've never played Starcraft 1 or 2, is it pointless to join at this point?  Does SC2 come with a tutorial for people brand new to the game?

Is there a way for you tell me how many brand new/inexperienced people there are on the game finder?

BTW: Are you put at a disadvantage at all if you have a TKL keyboard?

no it isn't pointless because both games (incl. sc1 addon) are great games and one of the best rts games ever.
and yes both games have a tutorial for beginners. also the campaign has a learning curve which starts easy and
ends mediocre hard (depending of the difficulty level). plus you can define the difficulty level.
in sc2 you can even switch the difficulty level in each mission
and they are 2 ways to reach the final mission.

they are more than enough new inexperienced ppl in the bnet 2.0 and you can play 50 games in the practice league
before starting ladder qualification. after ladder qualification you'll be assign to a league and a devision.
every 10months or so the leagues will be restarted and you'll have to qualify again.
also sc2 is easier to master then sc1 and sc1 bw.

you see, it's never too late to start the game.

BTW:for the list

EU Server... Haestan.606  (i'm a plat/diamond protoss noob)
most of a time a play 2v2+ and sometimes 1v1 custom against plat, diamond or master.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: foxer on Fri, 01 July 2011, 06:03:22
Quote from: voltrons*lips;370658
Hey if you've never played Starcraft 1 or 2, is it pointless to join at this point?  Does SC2 come with a tutorial for people brand new to the game?

Is there a way for you tell me how many brand new/inexperienced people there are on the game finder?

BTW: Are you put at a disadvantage at all if you have a TKL keyboard?

 
It comes with a great campaign and challenges which will help you out a lot. You can also play against different levels of AI to work on builds etc...

Well, before you play properly, you get 50 practice games against newbies which could help you. I find that playing 10-15 to work out the hotkeys a bit are all they're useful for. In all honesty, when you do your placement games, you do NOT want to win them all. Get into bronze and work on from there onwards. Otherwise it's pointless 'cause you'll get steamrolled and it'll wind you up.

No, definitely not. I'm wanting to get a tenkeyless Filco as soon as possible. You don't need the keypad for SC2.

This game for me is the best RTS ever. Other than BW of course, but it's astounding.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: RiGS on Fri, 01 July 2011, 06:43:45
I wish Blizzard would come up with WC4.
I prefer the Warcraft series over SC, because they're lot more micro and action oriented.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Fri, 01 July 2011, 10:06:55
Quote from: voltrons*lips;370658
Hey if you've never played Starcraft 1 or 2, is it pointless to join at this point?  Does SC2 come with a tutorial for people brand new to the game?

Is there a way for you tell me how many brand new/inexperienced people there are on the game finder?

BTW: Are you put at a disadvantage at all if you have a TKL keyboard?

 
SC2 hasn't even been released for a full year quite yet so its certainly not too late to join in. The Lleague and ladder system really helps allow a slower initiation into the game too. Once you get the basics down (took me about 20-30 games before I felt like I knew units, hotkeys and a comfortable control group layout) you'll be rolling the bronze league and can focus on getting better at the game, rather than just learning how do do what you want in the game. I'd highly recommend to anyone that they atleast give the game a chance. Some people I know played for a few months and gave up because they stopped trying to learn and got frustrated with being stuck in silver or gold. But others I know managed to make diamond in 2 months because they understood the game and just improved consistently.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: AndrewZorn on Fri, 01 July 2011, 17:25:53
I would NOT play the practice games. Play the comp a couple of times, if you want, but the practice games in multiplayer are slowed WAAAY down and have different maps and should do nothing but confuse in the end.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Fri, 01 July 2011, 21:54:08
Quote from: AndrewZorn;371546
I would NOT play the practice games. Play the comp a couple of times, if you want, but the practice games in multiplayer are slowed WAAAY down and have different maps and should do nothing but confuse in the end.

That's true, I forgot to mention that in my last post. I played against the computer for about 10 games and then jumped right in online and skipped the practice games. That meant that I lost all my placements and the first 15 games on the ladder, but then I quickly picked up and started getting a better and better win rate.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: flaming_june on Mon, 04 July 2011, 06:01:34
Question for you guys: how do you turn double click off in the game?  I don't like to click really fast then it auto select all of the units when I only wanted one.  I've already have windows double click set to the lowest so only the quickest double click will enable a double click in game.  However that's still not good enough.  I still select all my workers when I want one.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: HaveANiceDay on Mon, 04 July 2011, 08:57:44
Is the double click issue only happening in starcraft2?
There are reports of some razer mice that sometimes do a double click instead of a single click. Could be a hardware issue, or you are trying to play faster than you can at the moment.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: RiGS on Mon, 04 July 2011, 13:02:17
It is an issue of the omron microswitch. It's easy to fix (http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=594646) it.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: flaming_june on Mon, 04 July 2011, 15:27:19
I may open my mouse up and see if I can mod that to my liking, however that link isn't my issue.  I just double click too fast and would like to disable it sc2.  If that's not possible, maybe in windows all together.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: RiGS on Tue, 05 July 2011, 05:26:46
Quote from: ripster;373147
At least I know RiGs reads my posts.

I wonder if Hungarians get Ducky puns?

 
I have that site bookmarked a long ago.
Actually I think you got this from me, I posted it on GH numerous times before.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Oqsy on Thu, 14 July 2011, 21:45:24
Rulz
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Aznguyen316 on Fri, 15 July 2011, 00:56:03
Quote from: dante;380661
Is their any reason why you couldn't play SC2 with a KBC Poker?

Really just need escape to cancel via a key which can be your tilde. Lazy worker hotkey and fast access to menus but those all have ui buttons.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sndstrm on Fri, 15 July 2011, 01:11:12
I play with a KBC poker and I love it!  I just keep the ESC key activated and moved some of my hotkeys around (which I had already done anyways).  For whatever reason I can find keys much quicker on my poker than with other larger format keyboards.  However, I would never want to use it for word processing.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Bry on Mon, 18 July 2011, 09:55:20
Hello GH, I haven't had a whole lot of time to devote to SC lately but when I do, I spend about every spare minute on that game.

Orestes #533
I also hang around some of the Quakenet IRC rooms, mostly #day9tv, and in the past I've done some things with that community such as assisting some of my moderator friends in reviewing funday monday replays for the Day9 Daily.

So essentially, I'm that guy that spends 98% of his StarCraft time with community stuff, and watching streams and 2% of that time actually playing XD

I'm a Platinum Protoss by the way, but when I stopped laddering due to a lack of time to devote to the game, I was taking plenty of games off of high diamonds on ladder >:]

Edit, I guess I should also add that I'm on the NA server.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hcry4 on Mon, 18 July 2011, 10:40:41
Quote from: sndstrm;380805
I play with a KBC poker and I love it!


Good to see that there are people who like to use a compact keyboard to play.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Brink on Mon, 18 July 2011, 12:05:54
If the list is still being updated:

EU player here: Ever.237
Gold/Plat - Protoss

I play with the Razer Black Widow at the moment, and using the macro buttons for location-binds.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: pitashen on Mon, 18 July 2011, 12:23:04
Just found out that Logitech G1 (1000 dpi Ver.) is still widely available in Asia. It seems it is still considered a good RTS mouse. I am using the good old M-BJ58 with 500Hz polling rate. Pretty happy with it except the rather low dpi.

http://global.pchome.com.tw/?mod=item&func=exhibit&IT_NO=DCAH02-A53788593&SR_NO=DCAH02&ROWNO=10&tm=u
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Tempy on Mon, 18 July 2011, 13:18:20
I'm Tempy, i ahve both NA and EU accounts, a masters protoss player (only around 140-ish ingame apm) I don't really get to play too often as i am ofteneither working or doing schoolwork, but if you see me on you guys should hit me up
Will post my codes when i am not at work lol
NA Tempy.815 (i think)
EU Tempy.301

i use my linear-r and a logitech g500 with a steelseries qck,
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: roknir on Tue, 19 July 2011, 22:25:18
CKroknir.761 [NA]

I played SC:BW on and off since the first battlechest came out.  I've been playing SC2 since mid-beta.  I'm not nearly as good as I sound.  I'm a gold Zerg.

I'm all for getting stomped by people that are better than me though, so feel free to randomly message me for games.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Tue, 19 July 2011, 23:01:55
I'm Hashbaz.138, NA sever.  Been playing since the beta.  Played Broodwar before that, since its release.  Warcraft 2 before that.  I'm still terrible. :-|
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Tempy on Wed, 20 July 2011, 09:09:18
so do we actually meet in the "GeekHack" channel? or is it two words?

maybe i'll pm the thread starter to update the list
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nasus on Mon, 25 July 2011, 18:50:33
Quote from: Tempy;383975
so do we actually meet in the "GeekHack" channel? or is it two words?

one word. I don't think it's case sensitive. come visit!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 27 July 2011, 05:00:29
I played some good games against someone in the #geekhack channel on battlenet, would recommend hanging out there if you want some good games.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Tempy on Wed, 27 July 2011, 11:57:26
is it #geekhack? or just geekhack, i ahve seen nasus on there but like no one else, i got thrown back to diamond for having 1k bonus pool at the end of season 2, dont worry i'm going to play when i ahve time coming up >.> that star will be mine again!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: HaveANiceDay on Wed, 27 July 2011, 16:56:23
FML I got demoted to platinum. Need to practice once again I guess.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Wed, 27 July 2011, 17:29:07
Quote from: Tempy;388170
is it #geekhack? or just geekhack, i ahve seen nasus on there but like no one else, i got thrown back to diamond for having 1k bonus pool at the end of season 2, dont worry i'm going to play when i ahve time coming up >.> that star will be mine again!

it's just geekhack, too used to irc when talking about channels. I'm in there after 4AM EST T-F cause that's when I get out of work, and during normal hours on Sun and Mon, though I don't really have much time to play Starcraft every day.

Yeah I think I have 1k bonus pool, so if that's the criteria for demotion, I guess I'm gonna be demoted even though I had like a 66% winrate season 2
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Wed, 27 July 2011, 18:50:37
I'm frequently on bnet on weekdays in the 9:00pm - 1:00am PDT timeframe.  I'll start hanging out on the GH channel.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Tempy on Wed, 27 July 2011, 22:36:20
nah it just shows how inactive i was, i'm pretty sure you want to be active in masters or well in any league, i have heard of a lot of funky promotions/demotions in season 3, i was demoted, by friend who hasn't played 1v1 in 2 months got promoted to masters, a diamond friend of mine got thrown back to plat, weird weird stuff
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Thu, 28 July 2011, 00:18:03
I haven't really played for the past two weeks and when I went back I was shocked at how much worse I was. I don't want to throw away what little ability I did have, but at the same time its quite disheartening to have been almost plat level and now suddenly be playing at silver level. :(
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Thu, 28 July 2011, 04:19:11
Played my placement match, won but stayed in gold league. Played another game against a gold leaguer who was slightly favored and won.

Word of advice to those in the lower leagues who want to advance, and feel that they're better than they're ranked due to previous RTS experience: just play off one base and roll all the ladder kiddies left and right. A lot of my losses (besides very early on due to simply not understanding the units and abilities of this game) prior to taking my break from StarCraft were due to letting people tech up/macro up for free because I didn't want to get a cheap win.

Screw that.

Punish all the people who blindly follow econ/tech builds that they read off the internet with early pressure and watch them fall apart and ragequit. A lot of people play really greedy openings that you'd be a fool not to take advantage of. In the lower leagues, just rush rush rush everyone, because if they aren't able to scout a rush and properly adjust their build, they shouldn't be in any league above silver, so don't feel bad.

[edit]besides, these crappy blizzard maps practically beg you to rush, so just keep doing it until blizzard realizes the mistake they made and releases more KeSPA style maps.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Tempy on Thu, 28 July 2011, 07:49:27
Quote from: speakeasy;388636
Played my placement match, won but stayed in gold league. Played another game against a gold leaguer who was slightly favored and won.

Word of advice to those in the lower leagues who want to advance, and feel that they're better than they're ranked due to previous RTS experience: just play off one base and roll all the ladder kiddies left and right. A lot of my losses (besides very early on due to simply not understanding the units and abilities of this game) prior to taking my break from StarCraft were due to letting people tech up/macro up for free because I didn't want to get a cheap win.

Screw that.

Punish all the people who blindly follow econ/tech builds that they read off the internet with early pressure and watch them fall apart and ragequit. A lot of people play really greedy openings that you'd be a fool not to take advantage of. In the lower leagues, just rush rush rush everyone, because if they aren't able to scout a rush and properly adjust their build, they shouldn't be in any league above silver, so don't feel bad.

[edit]besides, these crappy blizzard maps practically beg you to rush, so just keep doing it until blizzard realizes the mistake they made and releases more KeSPA style maps.


yeah... i do not agree with that at all unless it is pvp, the key to getting better is learning to macro, i'm pretty sure i can get to diamond easily by just macroing, no build order gimmicks , pure unadulterated macro, and frankly macroing on one base is not hard

with that mindset i would be surprised if you get to high diamond (unless you are protoss and 4 gate, i could see that getting to high diamond, even after that "nerf")

and i would even say that lower leagues are more dominated by 1 base play, and that if you play and learn macro style will win you more games than 1 base vs 1 base...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Aznguyen316 on Thu, 28 July 2011, 09:29:39
Valid points on both speakeasy and Tempy.  I'm a silver leaguer that enjoys watching a ton of matches and a friend of mine loves to try to help me get better although it's harder to implement that into actual gameplay.  Speakeasy speaks truth about lower levels "falling apart" and it's true at times I feel like I'm not sure what to do come mid game vs an opponent and it gets frustrating because I feel like I should know what to do.  I've watched enough games and played SC1 and SC2 for a long time and after each game I am always like damn, I should've done this or that.  I play zerg and I find I can get my macro up pretty well doing a FE and get a fair amount of units out, yet when it comes to playing vs Terran, the marine + tank always seems to get me no matter how good my economy is.  It's usually b/c I forget to do a number of things like scout properly, or get the right units to counter the tanks/marines etc etc.  Anyway, I used to do the roach bust a lot to get a few wins under my belt but other times I also just FE and try to macro and learn how to be reactive.  Both ways to me are okay b/c I am learning fundamentals and whatever else in each style of gameplay.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Tempy on Thu, 28 July 2011, 09:54:41
the game is about macro,scouting and knowing how to react. it takes many number of games to know how to react to the limitless possibilies your opponent can execute. However, even if you know what to do, if you cannot improve your macro, you will not advance in leagues, only in higher diamond would i start to worry about micro
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Thu, 28 July 2011, 17:52:53
There's more than one way to get to higher leagues. Someone people have gotten to masters using 3 rax all ins, some people have gotten to masters macroing out an army comp of just stalkers.

I'm just tired of people saying the game is about macro. The game is whatever the metagame dictates the game is about. And in the lower leagues, if people are going to blindly tech rush and fast expand, you'd better punish them for it. I can't understand why anyone, including zergs, should get a free expansion if they don't know how to defend it properly. Why play a 20 minute game when you can play 3 7 minute games in about the same time span? Or even worse, a 40 minute TvT where you're playing from behind the whole game because your opponent opened greedily and you didn't punish them for it? What's the point getting into a macro contest against someone with a non-viable greedy opening? You can play standard, and they will have a better economy/better tech than you because you didn't hit their early wide open timing window. Are you supposed to be expected to outmacro someone with a greedy opening? How is your macro supposed to improve then?

My macro is already pretty decent from Broodwar, and this game makes it so much easier with automining, multiple buildings on one hotkey, MULEs, calldown supplies, etc.

If your macro is already at a decent level, I feel it's better to get to the higher leagues where play is already more standard and start macroing once you're playing opponents who play similarly. Otherwise, it's a lot less stressful to just rush people. Plus, you're doing them a favor by forcing them to learn how to scout, adapt and hold early pushes.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Tempy on Thu, 28 July 2011, 19:58:16
hitting timing windows isn't important if you macro well... thats the point, if you have better macro than your opponent, even if they are greedy in opening if your macro is better you will still win. you are confusing hitting timing attacks with making units, the two need to go together... making units and workers is important no matter what level you are at, all i'm saying is that at the less than platinum level you really shouldn't have a build where you cut workers.

you can keep your opinions speakeasy, i don't need to defend myself because i'm already in the "higher" leagues.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Aznguyen316 on Thu, 28 July 2011, 23:13:42
Tempy which of your keyboards do u prefer for sc
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Thu, 28 July 2011, 23:34:56
Quote from: Tempy;389071
hitting timing windows isn't important if you macro well... thats the point, if you have better macro than your opponent, even if they are greedy in opening if your macro is better you will still win. you are confusing hitting timing attacks with making units, the two need to go together... making units and workers is important no matter what level you are at, all i'm saying is that at the less than platinum level you really shouldn't have a build where you cut workers.

you can keep your opinions speakeasy, i don't need to defend myself because i'm already in the "higher" leagues.


Congratulations? You don't need to defend yourself because my original post never applied to you, no need for you to take offense to it, has nothing to do with your rank.

I don't believe I've said anything that was untrue. All I'm saying is that you can get to higher leagues doing this. As an example, someone even offraced as terran and made it to #1 Masters in 2 days this way. The game is simply too young and undeveloped for people to say there is already a proper way to play the game.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: pitashen on Fri, 29 July 2011, 11:51:39
Quote from: dante;389397
Out of curiosity I've noticed that the minimum system requirements have Windows XP while in the "recommended" specs its absent.

Why would XP get eliminated from the recommended specs?

No idea. But you will do just fine with WindowsXP
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Fri, 29 July 2011, 17:11:13
Quote from: dante;389397
Out of curiosity I've noticed that the minimum system requirements have Windows XP while in the "recommended" specs its absent.

Why would XP get eliminated from the recommended specs?

If I had to venture a guess, it probably has something to do with the lack of directx 10 support on win xp
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: qtan5370 on Fri, 29 July 2011, 18:22:42
Used to be master toss in NA and no time to play anymore since starting selling keyboard.

May be back to SC2 later and start laddering again When BLZ fix toss!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Fri, 29 July 2011, 22:34:00
Quote from: qtan5370;389624
Used to be master toss in NA and no time to play anymore since starting selling keyboard.

May be back to SC2 later and start laddering again When BLZ fix toss!

lol, protoss is dominating these days in the pro scene.  Perhaps it's time to come out of retirement qtan. :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Aznguyen316 on Sat, 30 July 2011, 00:06:10
so far in MLG it seems like Koreans have taken Terran to the next level. Damn! Go ZERG!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Sat, 30 July 2011, 00:08:18
Quote from: Aznguyen316;389765
so far in MLG it seems like Koreans have taken Terran to the next level. Damn! Go ZERG!

Indeed.  How did hellions suddenly get so good? :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Tempy on Sat, 30 July 2011, 08:14:29
i like all of them for sc2? the plu determinately works, and the blues are seriously the most fun to type on. but strictly for sc2 i would pick the red switches. that being said i am selling my reds because the blues are just too much fun as a daily driver lol
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Index on Sat, 30 July 2011, 12:44:03
Guess what? Im at mlg anaheim 2011 in the audience for sc2 mainstage.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Sat, 30 July 2011, 16:28:28
Damn, I'm jealous! I did enjoy tuning in for the GSL finals yesterday though. I'm a big NesTea fan so yeah wouldn't miss his games for anything.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Mitchellderp on Sat, 30 July 2011, 17:07:29
Anyone from europe, I'm a silver zerg looking for anyone to practise with.

Eragon 657
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Waterdr1nker on Sat, 30 July 2011, 17:49:32
I'm a Silver Protoss from NA. I'm looking for much better players than I to practice with. I would like to vastly improve.

MikeShredder.682

(Thinking of using my name change to make it Waterdr1nker...ya?)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Sun, 31 July 2011, 00:14:54
Quote from: dante;390225
Do you guys think it's possible for someone to be truly great at SC using a trackball?  I really enjoy my trackball but sometimes there is some "doubt" that it would handicap a player somehow.

I used to use a trackball way back when. But I didn't really like it. I do find that I get more speed and accuracy with a regular mouse.

@waterdr1nker - yeah I too would like to find better players to play against. I'm a gold zerg with NA and SEA accounts...pretty bad at the game though.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: DivineWind on Sun, 31 July 2011, 17:30:40
I wonder if any of the popular professional StarCraft players use a trackball.  I am a high gold level Protoss here.  Hopefully I will be in Platinum soon.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Chobopants on Mon, 01 August 2011, 06:03:14
Quote from: DivineWind;390594
I wonder if any of the popular professional StarCraft players use a trackball.  I am a high gold level Protoss here.  Hopefully I will be in Platinum soon.

I'm not going to say it's impossible, just very unlikely. Just can't see it, though a friend of mine once proved to me that you can play an FPS decently with a trackball. After that I'll believe anything.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: HaveANiceDay on Mon, 01 August 2011, 10:36:29
It would be really, really difficult to use a trackball at a high level. In a FPS, I can see it work as aiming is done in a mostly predictable fashion. You can train yourself to use flicks to turn a certain degree really fast.
The problem with SC2 is, there are lots of unpredictable patterns(oxymoron?) how you use the cursor. There is screen scrolling, box selecting various sizes, minimap usage, single-selecting lots of units in a very short time span, etc. I just can't imagine using banelings or blink micro with a trackball.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: ChocolateRain on Mon, 01 August 2011, 23:34:38
Hey guys im new to the forums but i have lurked here for a while. i took advantage of the "great deals" section and got a G80-8113 with clears when i was in search of a new keyboard. I am a high Platinum Terran i would love to get some practice games in with some of you guys :)

ChocoRain
160

GLHF
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Aznguyen316 on Tue, 02 August 2011, 11:04:53
Any HHKB Pro 2 users that play SC2?  I'm not concerned about the F-keys so much, but just curious how the topre handles spamming keys, sd sd sd etc double tapping.  General SC2 stuff.  Thanks!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Chobopants on Tue, 02 August 2011, 13:18:23
Quote from: Aznguyen316;391578
Any HHKB Pro 2 users that play SC2?  I'm not concerned about the F-keys so much, but just curious how the topre handles spamming keys, sd sd sd etc double tapping.  General SC2 stuff.  Thanks!

Topre keys are amazing for SC2. I use my Realforce as my main SC2 board.

Also (to everyone in this thread) -

MUCH easier than posting your user info in this thread is go to the "geekhack" channel on battle.net. There's a setting to autojoin channels so you don't have to join it each time you log on. I'm really not interested in adding random people onto my buddy list, which I reserve for friends but I idle in the GH channel and am always down for a match if people are interested.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hcry4 on Tue, 02 August 2011, 13:47:22
Quote from: Aznguyen316;391578
Any HHKB Pro 2 users that play SC2?  I'm not concerned about the F-keys so much, but just curious how the topre handles spamming keys, sd sd sd etc double tapping.  General SC2 stuff.  Thanks!


I don't really play a whole lot, but I do use my HHKB when I do. No real issues for me. I actually use my m570, too. Mainly 4v4 with friends.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: HaveANiceDay on Tue, 02 August 2011, 18:45:46
Dammit my condition is worse than I thought, lost 10 out of 17 games today.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sinis on Sat, 06 August 2011, 20:26:17
loved this european battle.net invitational livestream today.

just kidding it was ridiculous.

/ragequit
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Ballcuzzi on Sat, 06 August 2011, 20:59:57
Diamond Terran LF Practice Partners/Friends/ETC.
I will offer free coaching for lower league players too! (Terran only though)
Add Me @ baLLcuZZi.593
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Tue, 09 August 2011, 08:11:05
Played Nexus Word Wars with my friend for the first time last night, lol wow it's pretty fun. I'd imagine it would be more fun playing with people from here :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Index on Tue, 09 August 2011, 11:56:25
Scouting is so hard with Zerg =(
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: iamtwon on Tue, 09 August 2011, 15:23:10
I watch about 100% more Starcraft than I play because my computer sucks so bad. I guess I need work on fixing that. Index, watch more nestea.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Index on Tue, 09 August 2011, 16:30:55
Why specifically Nestea? I mean I know he's the best zerg player, and arguably the best player right now. Other than that why? Does he have amazing scouting?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Tue, 09 August 2011, 18:03:45
Yes, NesTea has amazing scouting. It's what makes him the best player in the world right now. He plays zerg reactively not aggressively and as such, he needs to know exactly what his opponent is doing so that he knows when it is safe to drone up and when he needs to be preparing for an attack.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: flaming_june on Sun, 14 August 2011, 20:46:03
Well no, neastea is a god because he's unbelievably smart.  Scouting is just part of his skillset.  Other people who scout just as much are still nowhere near his cerebral play.  The other parts that you said is just zerg basics.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Mon, 15 August 2011, 02:00:06
Quote from: flaming_june;399016
Well no, neastea is a god because he's unbelievably smart.  Scouting is just part of his skillset.  Other people who scout just as much are still nowhere near his cerebral play.  The other parts that you said is just zerg basics.

Yeah, he's smart, he knows how to interpret his scouting which is what a lot of other people lack, but without scouting he wouldn't be able to win so I'd still argue he's one of the best players to check out for seeing how. Because if you can spend some time figuring out what he notices just from seeing certain stuff then you should be able to apply it to some extent in the game.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: pitashen on Mon, 15 August 2011, 10:29:26
Quote from: Hydroid;399125
Yeah, he's smart, he knows how to interpret his scouting which is what a lot of other people lack, but without scouting he wouldn't be able to win so I'd still argue he's one of the best players to check out for seeing how. Because if you can spend some time figuring out what he notices just from seeing certain stuff then you should be able to apply it to some extent in the game.

It is quite basic for pro-gamers to effectively guesstimate what the opponent is doing by seeing only a few clues. The quality of the strategic part of the decision making under immense pressure is what really differentiates between each pro players.

In any case, one should be able to reach diamond league with just proper scouting, money spending and macroing.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: ogreofdakka on Wed, 17 August 2011, 18:24:11
I can't believe I haven't seen this thread earlier. I play SCII on the NA server as DirTyOGRE. I am not a very good 1v1 player, but I love playing team games if anyone would be interested in 2v2s or 3v3s. I play a Macro oriented Terran.

BTW I actually prefer Sen's Zerg play to NesTea for some reason. I think its because its got those weird ass timings.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Softdrink 117 on Thu, 18 August 2011, 16:37:31
Dittoing above about not seeing this earlier.

I play Terran on NA as Softdrink, with the weird ID code thingy as 505. I'm actually pretty good in terms of mechanics and practical knowledge, but I have almost no real game experience because I've been so busy with school. As in, I haven't played since late season one. At all.

I'm really looking to find people to play custom games with before I head back into the ladder. I *am* in bronze league (or was back when I was ranked), but have been able to keep pace with Korean platinum players before-- the bronze placing was really just due to inexperience, which remains my real problem.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Feign on Thu, 18 August 2011, 16:48:49
I play on the EU server.

Feign.892

In fact, i joined this site to get some advice on customising key caps for a slightly Starcraft 2 themed keyboard (Korean legends and a purple "make more drones" key).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Susiria on Fri, 19 August 2011, 02:34:54
Quote from: Softdrink 117;401215
Dittoing above about not seeing this earlier.

I play Terran on NA as Softdrink, with the weird ID code thingy as 505. I'm actually pretty good in terms of mechanics and practical knowledge, but I have almost no real game experience because I've been so busy with school. As in, I haven't played since late season one. At all.

I'm really looking to find people to play custom games with before I head back into the ladder. I *am* in bronze league (or was back when I was ranked), but have been able to keep pace with Korean platinum players before-- the bronze placing was really just due to inexperience, which remains my real problem.
You've played on the Korean server and played their Platinums? Apparently they're equal to NA/EU's Diamond league.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Softdrink 117 on Fri, 19 August 2011, 11:48:55
Quote from: Susiria;401474
You've played on the Korean server and played their Platinums? Apparently they're equal to NA/EU's Diamond league.

 
Sorry, I should clarify: I have a couple Korean friends, one of whom is only on the US servers part time and spends the rest elsewhere, presumably on the Korean server. And he is just like @_@

Back when I last played him (months ago), it was in Season one when you could see win/loss ratio. His was something like 200 to 10, and he was flying up through the ranks. I played a long series of custom games with him, at his request, after being paired up on a random 1v1 on Xel'Naga.

So no, I'm not that good. >.<
I have beaten some NA plats, but that was a long time ago. Right now, I totally suck.

My downfall, like I said before, is simple lack of game experience. Having a good grasp of the game's mechanics, balancing macro and micro, scouting-- these are things that I'm relatively good at (some much more than others)-- but without enough knowledge of how people actually play the game they don't make any real difference.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Sat, 20 August 2011, 18:00:09
There seems to be a sudden increase in masters players creating smurf accounts on the SEA region. I've had the pleasure or misfortune to be pitted against two of these players in their placements only to get well and truly destroyed as expected. I guess there isn't any shame in losing to a masters player while in the gold league, and I did get to chat to them and ended up playing a few custom games with each, but it does give you quite a shock the first time when they just seem to have twice as much as you expect.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: guilleguillaume on Sun, 21 August 2011, 11:52:57
There is the prove that MC does use a Qsenn and not a Realforce:

(http://i.imgur.com/7rkVI.jpg)

Pic from the IEM at Cologne
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: flaming_june on Tue, 23 August 2011, 19:54:33
Maybe he just didn't want to bring a heavy and expensive keyboard to overseas while he still competes in the GSTL in Korea.  He's doing up n down matches this season too right?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: HeavyArms on Wed, 24 August 2011, 23:15:31
HeavyArms 443, nice to meet you all!

http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/2335832/HeavyArms
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Wed, 24 August 2011, 23:41:16
Did anyone notice Genius' keyboard in group H of GSL the other day?  He had some kind of plastic overlay or something.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Thu, 25 August 2011, 05:24:59
Yeah its a soft dust cover, kinda like the cover you get on filcos, leopolds and duckys but flexible enough to use the keyboard with it on. I got one with my Qsenn and it was great. I couldn't stand to game with it on, but I would put it on when I ate at the computer so that the keyboard would stay clean.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: flaming_june on Thu, 25 August 2011, 07:41:11
bongboong had it today as well.

Yup I see MC with qsenn atm vs taeja, whom's using metallic blue filco with red esc.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Susiria on Thu, 25 August 2011, 08:16:05
Quote from: flaming_june;404177
Maybe he just didn't want to bring a heavy and expensive keyboard to overseas while he still competes in the GSTL in Korea.  He's doing up n down matches this season too right?

When you compete in a tournament for money, I'd assume that every player would want their exact gear. MC's made so much money from sc2 anyways that he should buy a Realforce, though.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Tempy on Thu, 25 August 2011, 22:27:49
Quote
Back when I last played him (months ago), it was in Season one when you could see win/loss ratio. His was something like 200 to 10, and he was flying up through the ranks. I played a long series of custom games with him, at his request, after being paired up on a random 1v1 on Xel'Naga.


if you go 200-10 you do not get promoted, the mmr needs to settle before you can get promoted, there was a time during early season 1 or the beta (i forget) when they just introduced diamond, and i was in platinum with a like 85% win rate, could not get promoted, i literally threw 5 games (join and leave instantly) to drop my mmr to get promoted to where i belonged, i then proceeded to not play.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Softdrink 117 on Sun, 28 August 2011, 02:47:10
Quote from: Tempy;405285
if you go 200-10 you do not get promoted, the mmr needs to settle before you can get promoted, there was a time during early season 1 or the beta (i forget) when they just introduced diamond, and i was in platinum with a like 85% win rate, could not get promoted, i literally threw 5 games (join and leave instantly) to drop my mmr to get promoted to where i belonged, i then proceeded to not play.


Yup, I was aware of this. I meant he was flying up through his platinum league, as he had been placed initially at the bottom of it and was complaining about how he'd been number one for a few days without losing a match. My apologies for not being as clear as possible. I believe he eventually figured it out, but I haven't played with him in some time. Whenever I'm online he's either away, busy, or not online at all.

Unless I'm mistaken, the game uses mmr as a sort of running average to determine skill based partially on player win/loss ratio and partially on win/loss consistency, with a separate series of indicators for evaluating skill based on the rank or league difference between the players (which is part of the 'favored' screens that display during match loading). But what that ends up meaning is that unless you maintain a relatively consistent average performance by 'normalizing' your win/loss ratio every once in a while, it's impossible for the game to realize you're good enough for the next league. Which is kinda unfortunate and very frustrating, but makes the general matchmaking engine very fair.

It has been a while since I read the article on the Liquid forums though, so I could easily be forgetting something.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: dudebro on Mon, 29 August 2011, 19:23:44
DongRaeGu was playing with a Razer BlackWidow during last weekends MLG event in Raleigh. He was using the macro keys on the side quite a lot, and without the keycaps!

[video=youtube;0xRDdBL4aWc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xRDdBL4aWc[/video]
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nolliepoper on Mon, 29 August 2011, 19:43:26
Quote from: dudebro;407108
DongRaeGu was playing with a Razer BlackWidow during last weekends MLG event in Raleigh. He was using the macro keys on the side quite a lot, and without the keycaps!

I love DRG. I am also curious to what macro binds he uses. It's funny that he took off the keycaps, maybe have the feel of a standard keyboard, but he still uses the macro keys.

Plat Protoss here.
Username: nolliepoper
Char Code: 830
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: kywirelessguy on Tue, 30 August 2011, 07:43:47
Don't know if you guys saw this storyline from MLG Raleigh

Idra loses to Trimaster and slams his headset on his keyboard:
[video=youtube;4mdmWs1SfuY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mdmWs1SfuY&feature=player_detailpage#t=92s[/video]

Reddit user Thricey finds Idra's F4 key:
http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/jx35j/so_i_have_idras_f4_key_after_he_slammed_his/
(http://i.imgur.com/7fOYa.jpg)

Idra doesn't seem to want it back so Thricey gives it to Trimaster:
http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/jxiho/update_idras_f4_key_now_in_possession_of_its/
(http://i.imgur.com/TmVr6.jpg)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: kywirelessguy on Tue, 30 August 2011, 08:19:45
One more from Idra's perspective...

[video=youtube;DoT393WXrrU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoT393WXrrU&feature=player_detailpage#t=55s[/video]
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Tue, 30 August 2011, 13:07:10
Hah, we were talking about this yesterday at work.  Just imagine getting idra's D or T key -- the primal founts of his legions of drones and mutas. :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Chobopants on Tue, 30 August 2011, 13:58:57
Haha Idra is such a baby. Can't wait for more SC1 pros to come over to SC2 and he just fades away, a whiny bratty footnote of the progaming scene, nothing more.

He's not nearly as good as he thinks he is.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Tue, 30 August 2011, 15:44:14
Ouch.  I like idra.  Yeah, he's whiny and arrogant and defeatist, and I wonder how much he actually enjoys the game.  But I like that he speaks his mind, and that he can usually back up his analysis with real examples.  Obviously I don't know the guy, but I feel like if he took three months off or something and then returned fresh, it would ultimately do him a lot of good.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Hydroid on Tue, 30 August 2011, 16:49:34
Quote from: nolliepoper;407124
I love DRG. I am also curious to what macro binds he uses. It's funny that he took off the keycaps, maybe have the feel of a standard keyboard, but he still uses the macro keys.

Plat Protoss here.
Username: nolliepoper
Char Code: 830


Hitting cherry keys without the keycaps isn't actually that bad. I've got the caps lock off on my keyboard because I use the left side of A as a positional reference when playing SC2 and when I tried to put it back on I kept hitting caps lock instead of A when trying to use the attack move or do anything with A.

@ idra videos: I do think Idra is a little unsporting. I understand it is hard not to get angry, I mean we all do, but when the guy is literally on the other side of the table you stand up and give the guy a handshake. I've only played in a couple of tournaments online, but I've always taken a moment to go beyond gg when I lose. It really helps you to keep your temper under control if you just chat for 30 seconds to a minute after the game and then move on. And I find that when you are able to distil in your mind that your opponent was just another human being who was able to outplay you in some way it gives a good clear perspective on how to improve rather than feeling like you are up against an imbalanced, unstoppable and undefeatable wall.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Zet on Sun, 04 September 2011, 21:59:16
Too bad I was busy working and didn't had internet connection at home and missed that. Men I would enjoy watching this. I hate IdrA so much for being so bm... someone should really put him in his place xD
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Sun, 04 September 2011, 22:19:13
Anyone going to IPL3?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: RColinTaylor on Wed, 07 September 2011, 15:16:25
Colin.1289

I play quite a bit but I think at this point I am more of a spectator  than a player.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Mitchellderp on Wed, 07 September 2011, 15:47:36
Quote from: hashbaz;407634
Ouch.  I like idra.  Yeah, he's whiny and arrogant and defeatist, and I wonder how much he actually enjoys the game.  But I like that he speaks his mind, and that he can usually back up his analysis with real examples.  Obviously I don't know the guy, but I feel like if he took three months off or something and then returned fresh, it would ultimately do him a lot of good.

I was about to say that 3 months off would probably kill his skill levels due to getting out of practise but TLO pretty much did the same and he's nearly as good as he used to be in his prime of SC2.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: monked on Fri, 09 September 2011, 11:52:53
monk.866 (EU) some 1v1-4v4 ~dia
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: xmrxkrazy on Tue, 13 September 2011, 04:27:17
When Idra plays the game he thinks that because he practices way more than most foreign(non-Korean) SC2 players he deserves to win. He also probably thinks wars should be fought where people stand face to face on a battlefield in a line and fire, hoping their shots would land more so than their opponents shots.
You don't win solely on solid macro/build. You win because you out-think your opponent. To me he's still one stubborn little kid.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Tue, 13 September 2011, 07:57:47
I had this conversation with some coworkers a few weeks ago.  My conclusion is that Idra feels that, given adequate game knowledge, the player with the better mechanics "deserves" to win.  Not just that they usually will win -- they deserve to win.  Thus players that win with inferior mechanics have stolen something, or are an indication that something in the game is broken.  And of course he knows that he himself has the best mechanics among foreigners (which may be true).  This narrow view of the game feeds and justifies his contempt for other players, and causes him to get frustrated at the perceived futility of trying to win in desperate situations.

I really like Idra.  I've spent a lot of time listening to him on podcasts and streams.  The kid desperately needs some humility and perspective, not just because he'll be happier in general, but because it will help his game.  Thus I think he might benefit from leaving Starcraft for a while and coming back to it fresh.  Maybe he could travel the world and rediscover his true self in the steamy jungles of Bali, or hone his competitive edge by learning to dominate the world of competitive brisket barbecue.  Then he would return triumphantly to MLG, deeply tanned and tattooed, but wiser and more resilient.

[video=youtube;h0qVUn4797g]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0qVUn4797g[/video]
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: xmrxkrazy on Tue, 13 September 2011, 13:18:21
Quote from: hashbaz;415411
I had this conversation with some coworkers a few weeks ago.  My conclusion is that Idra feels that, given adequate game knowledge, the player with the better mechanics "deserves" to win.  Not just that they usually will win -- they deserve to win.  Thus players that win with inferior mechanics have stolen something, or are an indication that something in the game is broken.  And of course he knows that he himself has the best mechanics among foreigners (which may be true).  This narrow view of the game feeds and justifies his contempt for other players, and causes him to get frustrated at the perceived futility of trying to win in desperate situations.

Yup. Sums it all up about what I think too. It's surprising he could be that closed-minded though. Very surprising he doesn't know anything about luck or just natural born talent/knack.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Tue, 06 December 2011, 17:30:45
What the PiaNoppoo looks like after IPL3, IEM and MLG Providence:

(http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/393645_958356868134_14317726_42680370_1905007083_n.jpg)
(http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/390933_958356898074_14317726_42680371_1309341345_n.jpg)

Of course, all the beating it's been taking during traveling is now giving me issues with the USB cable :( Oh well, guess I have an excuse to buy another mech if I retire this one :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Tue, 06 December 2011, 17:50:04
Quote from: speakeasy;465377
What the PiaNoppoo looks like after IPL3, IEM and MLG Providence:
...
Of course, all the beating it's been taking during traveling is now giving me issues with the USB cable :( Oh well, guess I have an excuse to buy another mech if I retire this one :)



Dude you can't post that without listing who signed it!  All I can make out for sure is MMA, DeMuslim, Ret, MKP, and The Emperor himself...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: speakeasy on Tue, 06 December 2011, 18:04:25
Quote from: hashbaz;465391
Dude you can't post that without listing who signed it!  All I can make out for sure is MMA, DeMuslim, Ret, MKP, and The Emperor himself...

Ret, Huk, Idra, MKP, MMA, DRG, DeMuslim, MC, KawaiiRice and BoxeR. Met a ton of other players but alas, no more room on my keyboard (that's the trouble with tenkeyless) :( I actually gave up on getting signatures after the bottom was filled up, but I ran into BoxeR in one of those rare moments where he was alone out and in the open so I couldn't NOT get his signature :P
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Tue, 06 December 2011, 19:45:38
Quote from: speakeasy;465402
Ret, Huk, Idra, MKP, MMA, DRG, DeMuslim, MC, KawaiiRice and BoxeR. Met a ton of other players but alas, no more room on my keyboard (that's the trouble with tenkeyless) :( I actually gave up on getting signatures after the bottom was filled up, but I ran into BoxeR in one of those rare moments where he was alone out and in the open so I couldn't NOT get his signature :P

I am so jelly...

If anyone wants to Update the OP, My account is Hazeluff 338 (SEA), but i have NA and EU as well. I just can't remember the friend codes on those 2 regions.

Edit: Apparently its the same code over all servers. Hazeluff 338 Diamond Zerg
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: narlock on Tue, 13 December 2011, 04:26:03
add me
VodkaMan id 891
Diamond Protoss
pm if wanna practice)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Balgrog on Tue, 13 December 2011, 12:13:09
no one has talked about the naniwa **** storm yet?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: weenis on Tue, 13 December 2011, 13:06:46
weenis 923

SC2Ranks: http://sc2ranks.com/us/2030778/weenis
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Clydae on Tue, 13 December 2011, 13:21:01
The naniwa '**** storm' isn't worth talking about, in my opinion.

I'm a total noob at sc2 right now. Silver zerg player, add me if you want someone to beat up pretty hard :P
Clydae.132
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: pitashen on Tue, 13 December 2011, 13:37:47
Would like to take the chance to remind those who are still active on bnet to join the pvt channel "geekhack" whenever u are on! :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Wed, 14 December 2011, 10:10:56
Whats this **** about naniwa?

I looked on TL and saw the post about his Code S seed beeing revoked. But The threads are always so unclear as to why It happened. What exactly did he do to deserve this.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Mysteric on Wed, 14 December 2011, 10:14:06
Played a game against Nestea, both players were already eliminated so Naniwa worker rushed, got all of his probes killed and GG'd.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nar on Wed, 14 December 2011, 10:28:37
XskieS.387
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1143179/1/XskieS/

Main Protoss, but since I got placed in Gold after not playing for a year I decided to try and random and learn how to play every race. Sad that no one seems to be surprised at macro random player anymore. I'm pretty good at Zerg now, still get owned as Terran.

About the Naniwa thing, he actually raised has hands and took them off the keyboard and mouse after he a-moved the probes. He probably did a total of less than 10 actions the entire game.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Balgrog on Wed, 14 December 2011, 11:20:28
I main toss, but have been in a big slump so have been working on zerg, and it's actually pretty good. But I love blink stalkers and warp prisms way to much to give them up.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Wed, 14 December 2011, 12:57:24
Quote from: Mackem;470533
Played a game against Nestea, both players were already eliminated so Naniwa worker rushed, got all of his probes killed and GG'd.

I don't understand.  They were both already eliminated?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: byFd on Wed, 14 December 2011, 13:16:05
it was group stage and it was the last game of their group with them both having 0-3 record. so neither of them was able to advance anymore.
so naniwa didn't see the sense to play that match out and a clicked his workers to nesteas base.
he didn't even touch the keyboard i think and no micro. basically he threw the game
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Thu, 15 December 2011, 09:04:02
Quote from: byFd;470683
it was group stage and it was the last game of their group with them both having 0-3 record. so neither of them was able to advance anymore.
so naniwa didn't see the sense to play that match out and a clicked his workers to nesteas base.
he didn't even touch the keyboard i think and no micro. basically he threw the game


Right.

Naniwa has horrible attitude. Quite disrespectful to the fans/tournament. He's a good player, but not a good person imo.

I met him IRL at GSL (GSTL: F.U vs oGs). And I was getting photos with Thorzain and Naniwa. So I first got a photo with Naniwa, but then I was going for one with Thorzain and asked if Naniwa wanted to join and he said "Why? we already took one". He's not really friendly = (.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: byFd on Thu, 15 December 2011, 09:26:20
he also looks like enton imho :D

ehm psyduck that is in english :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Fri, 16 December 2011, 09:53:36
Quote from: byFd;471322
he also looks like enton imho :D

ehm psyduck that is in english :D

so retarded?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: wongster on Sat, 17 December 2011, 02:15:43
GSL Blizzard Cup is starting! DRG vs. MMA, gonna be some epic games :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Sat, 17 December 2011, 02:20:37
Rarrgh I hate the intro stuff.  GET TO THE GAMES.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: DanGWanG on Sat, 17 December 2011, 04:20:38
More people need to join the geekhack Channel.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: byFd on Sat, 17 December 2011, 05:01:46
i guess most of you people are from NA so i'd be pretty much alone in EU geekhack >D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nar on Sat, 17 December 2011, 07:25:26
That was seriously the best GSL Finals in its entire history.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Sat, 17 December 2011, 07:27:50
Quote from: nar;472713
That was seriously the best GSL Finals in its entire history.

Worth $10 to watch the vods?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nar on Sat, 17 December 2011, 08:53:38
$10 for just those finals, maybe. $10 for those finals and the vods for the group stages and the rest, ya.

Personally though, I'm probably just going to get the vods through the promo they have where if you pay premium for a year they give you blizzcup for free.

P.S. Even Idra thinks these finals are the best ever.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sat, 17 December 2011, 14:30:11
Quote from: DanGWanG;472673
More people need to join the geekhack Channel.

I just did this.

Also, I've been enjoying myself on playhem.com (http://playhem.com/by/hazeluff). They like hold small tournaments for points/cash. More fun than laddering and I the maps tend to be the MLG ones (slightly better than Ladder maps).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Sun, 18 December 2011, 01:56:35
Quote from: nar;472732
$10 for just those finals, maybe. $10 for those finals and the vods for the group stages and the rest, ya.

Personally though, I'm probably just going to get the vods through the promo they have where if you pay premium for a year they give you blizzcup for free.

P.S. Even Idra thinks these finals are the best ever.

Yeah, I saw his tweet from shortly after the finals ended.  I just coughed up and am watching now.  I'm such a sucker.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: DanGWanG on Sun, 18 December 2011, 10:01:42
Someone share their account with meeeeee :) I wanna watch too!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nar on Sun, 18 December 2011, 10:22:08
If you want to watch it, some people have uploaded some LQ Vods to youtube. They'll probably be gone very soon though.

Or just buy the subscription.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Sun, 18 December 2011, 23:35:30
Just finished.  Fantastic series, just a bit disappointed at who won...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: DanGWanG on Mon, 19 December 2011, 00:19:44
Updated name on Battle.net:

GGbrO.704

Hit me up if anyone wants to play!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: dimoniy on Thu, 22 December 2011, 17:02:05
I want to join the club!
I first found geekhack when I was in search for new keyboard (old one drowned in beer). I was sad because I could not play starcraft anymore but GH cheered me up.
P.S. dimoniy.307.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Thu, 22 December 2011, 17:35:49
Quote from: dimoniy;476193
I want to join the club!
I first found geekhack when I was in search for new keyboard (old one drowned in beer). I was sad because I could not play starcraft anymore but GH cheered me up.
P.S. dimoniy.307.

Get in the 'geekhack' chatroom ; D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Tue, 27 December 2011, 23:36:03
Wow, I haven't been ITT in quite some time!  Been focusing primarily on new married life (with future SC3 progamer!), work, and a bit of StarCraft here and there.

Anyone else have a KR account? I got mine a few weeks back and am loving the experience I'm having over there.  Definitely a lot harder (only in Platinum league there as opposed to Diamond in NA) but I'm improving quite a bit.  Learning a lot of stuff from reviewing my gameplay and analyzing with SC2Gears.

Has there been an updated list of GeekHack SC2 players yet? I noticed OP hasn't been updated in quite some time.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: pitashen on Wed, 28 December 2011, 00:10:52
Quote from: sawedust;478777
Wow, I haven't been ITT in quite some time!  Been focusing primarily on new married life (with future SC3 progamer!), work, and a bit of StarCraft here and there.

Anyone else have a KR account? I got mine a few weeks back and am loving the experience I'm having over there.  Definitely a lot harder (only in Platinum league there as opposed to Diamond in NA) but I'm improving quite a bit.  Learning a lot of stuff from reviewing my gameplay and analyzing with SC2Gears.

Has there been an updated list of GeekHack SC2 players yet? I noticed OP hasn't been updated in quite some time.

nope the list is pretty much dead. just remember to join the geekhack channel whenever you log on! :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: kaen on Wed, 28 December 2011, 05:27:49
I don't play but i am an avid spectator and watch everything i can get my hands on. Viewing Dreamhack/IPL3/MLG on a projector at home with some mates and a few beers is hugely entertaining. The last SOTG episode of the year was the most hilarious game related thing ive ever seen!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Wed, 28 December 2011, 10:06:54
Quote from: kaen;478872
I don't play but i am an avid spectator and watch everything i can get my hands on. Viewing Dreamhack/IPL3/MLG on a projector at home with some mates and a few beers is hugely entertaining. The last SOTG episode of the year was the most hilarious game related thing ive ever seen!

No GSL? that ****'s epic.

Yeah I love sitting back and watching these tournaments.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Wed, 28 December 2011, 10:55:41
Quote from: kaen;478872
I don't play but i am an avid spectator and watch everything i can get my hands on. Viewing Dreamhack/IPL3/MLG on a projector at home with some mates and a few beers is hugely entertaining. The last SOTG episode of the year was the most hilarious game related thing ive ever seen!


Last year's alcohol-fueled finale was even better, featuring drunken rants from both incontrol and Tyler on the subject of horses, with Day9 losing it in the background and a raspy-voiced, drunk JP trying to control everyone.  These two moments, which both happened in last year's finale, are probably the best material the show has ever produced (I hope it's funny out of context, because I was dying for most of that episode).  Geoff hasn't been this spontaneously funny in a while:

[video=youtube;9iSb5-X_2do]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iSb5-X_2do[/video]
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Balgrog on Wed, 28 December 2011, 13:28:17
Quote from: kaen;478872
I don't play but i am an avid spectator and watch everything i can get my hands on. Viewing Dreamhack/IPL3/MLG on a projector at home with some mates and a few beers is hugely entertaining. The last SOTG episode of the year was the most hilarious game related thing ive ever seen!

The final state of the game this year left me so god damn hungover for work the next day, I drank an entire bottle of scotch watching that then had to wake up at 7
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Wed, 28 December 2011, 14:15:23
I'm glad the state of the game has become this.

@_@
Title: brrrrrrr
Post by: PriceKila on Wed, 28 December 2011, 18:23:17
oh yes, that's good
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: NinetyOne on Thu, 29 December 2011, 08:45:57
Can add me to the list if you want - Nimbus -382 EU
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: pitashen on Thu, 29 December 2011, 12:26:05
join the "geekhack" channel whenever you log on guys! :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: shmithers on Thu, 29 December 2011, 14:49:13
I'm Silver NA right now. New years resolution: Masters NA by the end of the year. Wish me luck.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: weenis on Thu, 29 December 2011, 14:56:19
Quote from: shmithers;479745
I'm Silver NA right now. New years resolution: Masters NA by the end of the year. Wish me luck.

Good luck.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Thu, 29 December 2011, 23:30:50
Quote from: shmithers;479745
I'm Silver NA right now. New years resolution: Masters NA by the end of the year. Wish me luck.

Indeed gl to that.

I've made it from bronze to diamond from release to about 9 months after. So it's possible, unless you're really skilled at RTS already I think it'll take a lot of play ; p. Hwaiting.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sun, 15 January 2012, 12:51:48
Omg Omg Omg finally Masters (2v2). Too bad 2v2 is so much easier than 1v1. But tis still a good day.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]37580[/ATTACH]
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: OkGold on Sun, 15 January 2012, 18:33:44
my user is " okaygold " with 731 as my character code! I main Zerg and will be forever gold league. It started out as a joke with my name as I raised up through bronze and silver, but seems to be a bit of a curse now, oh well!

Went to MLG providence just a couple months back and got a =TON= of autographs, really happy, can't wait to get my newly painted keyboard some names on it!

running a 7G with keycaps built for zerg my S key has a groove on it so I use it as a home. pic related

[ATTACH=CONFIG]37609[/ATTACH]

I started a Division for us on SC2Ranks! so we can keep an eye on how everyone's doing! maybe a little motivation? Just find yourself on the site (or on blizzard) and paste the url in!

http://www.sc2ranks.com/c/11594/geekhack/ (http://www.sc2ranks.com/c/11594/geekhack/)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Gawkbasher on Mon, 16 January 2012, 01:36:03
Can put me down for this.  Gawkbasher.862 on NA server.

I'm not that great though, I mostly just watch streams.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nolliepoper on Mon, 16 January 2012, 01:58:16
Quote from: OkGold;491267
I started a Division for us on SC2Ranks! so we can keep an eye on how everyone's doing! maybe a little motivation? Just find yourself on the site (or on blizzard) and paste the url in!

http://www.sc2ranks.com/c/11594/geekhack/ (http://www.sc2ranks.com/c/11594/geekhack/)

I like this idea, is there a way to contact other members of the group?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Mon, 16 January 2012, 07:07:34
Just added my accounts (NA/EU/SEA). = p
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: OkGold on Mon, 16 January 2012, 10:15:43
Quote from: nolliepoper;491475
I like this idea, is there a way to contact other members of the group?

well you need the actual URL of their page, so if someone wanted to go through plugging in usernames and character codes to the top bar, we could add everyone on GH

edit: oop! just reread this, misunderstood. Knowing that everyone browses GH I think the best way of contact is through the PM system here. If you find someone you'd like to practice with, you can add them with the information on the front post.

That said, I just booted up SCII and there's already a geekhack channel on SCII, so we can play some games and junk! just click the chat channel button beside the clock on the mainscreen!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nolliepoper on Mon, 16 January 2012, 14:23:23
Not everybody has the same geekhack username as there Starcraft username.
Also, I am always in the geekhack chat channel when I am on Starcraft but there is usually only two or three people in there.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nar on Tue, 17 January 2012, 10:00:42
I just added myself on. Seems like I'm the only random player so far :p
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: pitashen on Tue, 17 January 2012, 10:19:30
sc2 fans, remember to join the geekhack channel whenever you log on!!!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Tue, 17 January 2012, 10:58:37
I'm bored so I'm gonna tell some SC2 Gags/Jokes once in a while = 3.

A bunch of marines and SCVs walk into a bar; The bartender asks them "Are you all-in yet?".

Badum-tst
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nar on Tue, 17 January 2012, 15:43:27
Well if we're going to start telling SC2 jokes...

Why don't infestors make good writers?
Because they can't handle feedback.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: crun on Tue, 17 January 2012, 16:26:55
derp its nice to see some sc2 players here,
in case any master player wants to practice with a toss, please add crun.515 and qppm.528 (smurf, sharing with a friend)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Tue, 17 January 2012, 16:39:48
Quote from: nar;492782
Well if we're going to start telling SC2 jokes...

Why don't infestors make good writers?
Because they can't handle feedback.

During the summer while i was working, I had barely anything to do at my job, so I browsed TL all day. Looked at the whole joke thread there ><. But I haven't heard yours before.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Tue, 17 January 2012, 22:10:16
Quote from: hazeluff;492834
During the summer while i was working, I had barely anything to do at my job, so I browsed TL all day. Looked at the whole joke thread there ><. But I haven't heard yours before.

Have you read the ramen thread?  That thread changed my life.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: cirE on Tue, 17 January 2012, 22:16:17
Artosis talking about keyboards:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rZ-pSD-VwM&feature=youtu.be&t=39s
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Tue, 17 January 2012, 22:35:07
Those suits look reaaaaally cheesy.  They should go back to the blazer + Handsome Nerd shirt look.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Wed, 18 January 2012, 08:38:45
Quote from: hashbaz;493127
Those suits look reaaaaally cheesy.  They should go back to the blazer + Handsome Nerd shirt look.

Yeah, I liked blazer over t-shirt. This is overkill.
Quote from: hashbaz;493104
Have you read the ramen thread? That thread changed my life.

No,

But if it's changed your life, I must have a look.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nar on Wed, 18 January 2012, 10:26:16
Quote from: hazeluff;492834
During the summer while i was working, I had barely anything to do at my job, so I browsed TL all day. Looked at the whole joke thread there ><. But I haven't heard yours before.

It's from reddit. One of the jokes explained by the famous sc2_joke_explainer (aka Day9)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: michaelgasser17 on Sat, 28 January 2012, 06:22:08
I'm Gassman or bankalt.  both are ID number 101
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: DalaiLameR on Sat, 28 January 2012, 07:13:30
hey hashbaz could you plz post a link to the ramen thread on TL.net? my life needs a change ;)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sat, 28 January 2012, 08:15:14
Also guys, GH SC2 Tourney!! Theres a thread in the keyboards section.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Sat, 28 January 2012, 11:18:10
Quote from: DalaiLameR;501433
hey hashbaz could you plz post a link to the ramen thread on TL.net? my life needs a change ;)

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=30466

54 pages of ramen variations and discussion.  The most life-changing thing was the notion of poaching an egg with the noodles while they cook.  So good.  Fancy ramen is now a GSL finals tradition. :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sat, 28 January 2012, 12:57:33
Quote from: hashbaz;501544
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=30466

54 pages of ramen variations and discussion.  The most life-changing thing was the notion of poaching an egg with the noodles while they cook.  So good.  Fancy ramen is now a GSL finals tradition. :)

Hmm Looks liek stuff I already do. Meh, Prob cos I'm asian.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: DalaiLameR on Sat, 28 January 2012, 12:58:09
geeklicious!
thanks alot, cant wait to try some variations :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sat, 28 January 2012, 13:17:13
Quote from: DalaiLameR;501617
geeklicious!
thanks alot, cant wait to try some variations :)

One of my personal favourites, is after cooking the instant ramen. Stir frying it in some soysauce.

mmmm nomnomnomnom
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: OkGold on Sat, 28 January 2012, 13:32:49
just getting into using mutas finally, it's benefiting my play about 500%, loving it!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sat, 28 January 2012, 13:43:22
Quote from: OkGold;501654
just getting into using mutas finally, it's benefiting my play about 500%, loving it!

Thats how I started, then when I got better (plat/diamond level) It was terrible. Terran always hitting right as spuire goes up...

So I bank like 800/800 for mutas, see force coming:

1) Make bane, Lose supply and then you have no way to harass.

2) Make mutas, get roflstomped by marines.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nar on Sat, 28 January 2012, 17:27:25
Quote from: hazeluff;501616
Hmm Looks liek stuff I already do. Meh, Prob cos I'm asian.

Ditto.

Also, anyone think that the english casters on GSL would look much better wearing the suits that the korean casters wear? (It's the beige coloured suit that you occasionally see when they switch to the korean casters for a moment before switching to the english ones)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sat, 28 January 2012, 17:39:47
Quote from: nar;501876
Ditto.

Also, anyone think that the english casters on GSL would look much better wearing the suits that the korean casters wear? (It's the beige coloured suit that you occasionally see when they switch to the korean casters for a moment before switching to the english ones)

I liked the blazer over T-Shirt. Then this season they started wearing a full suit. I want them to go back to the old ways = (
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nar on Sat, 28 January 2012, 18:50:12
The T-Shirt over Blazer had that cool nerd look, but I think GOM wants a more sportscaster look, and I don't believe any sportscasters wear anything less than at least a suit and a dress shirt.
What they have right now though looks way too formal.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sat, 28 January 2012, 21:29:23
Quote from: nar;501915
The T-Shirt over Blazer had that cool nerd look, but I think GOM wants a more sportscaster look, and I don't believe any sportscasters wear anything less than at least a suit and a dress shirt.
What they have right now though looks way too formal.

There is this caster/commentator/talk guy for Ice hockey and he wears the most colorful suits ever, so I think thats not quite true. And Esports appeals mainly to the younger generation and we're definitely fine with the dressed in casual. I think the blazer on shirt struck a smart look that also said "I am a gamer tho".
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Sat, 28 January 2012, 21:48:03
I think it's great if they want to go for a more professional sportscaster-ey look.  But those are not professional-looking suits.  They look like two 15-year-olds wearing ill-fitting hand-me-downs at a funeral.  The Korean casters do look much better.  When I think sportscaster, I think

(http://rowlandsoffice.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/sports-center5.jpg)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sat, 28 January 2012, 21:55:45
Who let Tastosis pick their wardrobe.../facepalm

I think a suit will work, just not the ones they have.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Sat, 28 January 2012, 22:00:31
Yup.  You can look casual or professional, but you can't look like a schlub.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: DalaiLameR on Sun, 29 January 2012, 07:30:55
I hate their new suits, too! way overdressed! ... I think wearing (and freely advertising for handsomenerd.com) their geeky tshirts under a blazer was the most authentic :-)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Gawkbasher on Sun, 19 February 2012, 01:36:46
Quote from: OkGold;491267
my user is " okaygold " with 731 as my character code! I main Zerg and will be forever gold league. It started out as a joke with my name as I raised up through bronze and silver, but seems to be a bit of a curse now, oh well!

Went to MLG providence just a couple months back and got a =TON= of autographs, really happy, can't wait to get my newly painted keyboard some names on it!

running a 7G with keycaps built for zerg my S key has a groove on it so I use it as a home. pic related

(Attachment) 37609[/ATTACH]

I started a Division for us on SC2Ranks! so we can keep an eye on how everyone's doing! maybe a little motivation? Just find yourself on the site (or on blizzard) and paste the url in!

http://www.sc2ranks.com/c/11594/geekhack/

Heh.  I had a team game on NA ladder with a dirty leaver named "OKGold" today.  I was about to come on here and yell at you but lulled when that wasn't your ID.  Glad it wasn't. :B

[ATTACH=CONFIG]41058[/ATTACH]
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sun, 19 February 2012, 14:16:42
Someone needs to calm my rage...Lost 5/5 games against favoured players. Not just those 10/11 points loss favoured, but the good old 1-2 point lost ones. Am I meant to try?

I slammed my desk and then BSOD. ==''
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sun, 19 February 2012, 19:00:55
Quote from: ripster;518857
Well, how you do in Starcraft not a very good indicator of how you'll do in RL.

The skills tho are somewhat transferable.

The Micro/Macro management. Resource management. Decision making. Critical thinking.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: yttrium on Fri, 24 February 2012, 07:21:36
tYcLief.133 (NA) here. Plat/diamond Zerg. Great with micro, working on my macro. Average around 100-150 apm depending on the game.

Currently use a Razer Lycosa and my new Revolution MX (old was an MX 1100). The Lycosa sucks though, and my new keyboard (Ducky 9008 G2, browns) should arrive today; can't wait. That should definitely help.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Fri, 24 February 2012, 12:22:15
Quote from: yttrium;524172
tYcLief.133 (NA) here. Plat/diamond Zerg. Great with micro, working on my macro. Average around 100-150 apm depending on the game.

Currently use a Razer Lycosa and my new Revolution MX (old was an MX 1100). The Lycosa sucks though, and my new keyboard (Ducky 9008 G2, browns) should arrive today; can't wait. That should definitely help.

Welcome to Geekhack fellow infested one.

I never liked the Lycosa... = D Enjoy your new ducky
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: wongster on Fri, 24 February 2012, 18:58:14
Whoa. Just found out there is a Barcraft in Berkeley this Sunday. I think I'll go check it out!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Weapon on Fri, 24 February 2012, 19:15:39
Quote from: hazeluff;518846
Someone needs to calm my rage...Lost 5/5 games against favoured players. Not just those 10/11 points loss favoured, but the good old 1-2 point lost ones. Am I meant to try?

I slammed my desk and then BSOD. ==''

I'm pretty sure if you win those games, you'll have a much better chance of being promoted.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Fri, 24 February 2012, 19:20:20
Quote from: Weapon;524779
I'm pretty sure if you win those games, you'll have a much better chance of being promoted.

I just dropped my MMR to Plat level (I'm diamond) because I don't play as often as I did ...FML
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Creizai on Fri, 24 February 2012, 23:07:45
I got 2 accounts in diamond now, one hasn't been played other is at plat mmr level also blah
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: yttrium on Sat, 25 February 2012, 19:42:46
Quote from: hazeluff;524384
Welcome to Geekhack fellow infested one.

I never liked the Lycosa... = D Enjoy your new ducky

This Lycosa really did suck. The Ducky ended up arriving a day late because FedEx had some trouble, but whatever! I love this keyboard so much already, my wpm already went from 100 to 120 and I'm getting better by the minute.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sat, 25 February 2012, 21:44:52
Quote from: yttrium;526146
This Lycosa really did suck. The Ducky ended up arriving a day late because FedEx had some trouble, but whatever! I love this keyboard so much already, my wpm already went from 100 to 120 and I'm getting better by the minute.

Ahahaha.

Once you go mech you never go back.

Typing on clouds of boobs~~~
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: yttrium on Sat, 25 February 2012, 22:13:34
Quote from: hazeluff;526234
Ahahaha.

Once you go mech you never go back.

Tru dat.

Plus I can switch the keycaps to help learn dvorak.

Quote from: hazeluff;526234
Typing on clouds of boobs~~~
...wat.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sat, 25 February 2012, 22:17:31
Quote from: yttrium;526266
Tru dat.

Plus I can switch the keycaps to help learn dvorak.


...wat.

Blank keycaps ftw. You shouodn't ever have to look down on your keyboard unless its shift + num. Those symbols are so hard to remember.

The clouds of boobs thing is a figure of speech from this forum == something about Reds/Topres. ><
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: yttrium on Sat, 25 February 2012, 23:12:37
Quote from: hazeluff;526273
Blank keycaps ftw. You shouodn't ever have to look down on your keyboard unless its shift + num. Those symbols are so hard to remember.

The clouds of boobs thing is a figure of speech from this forum == something about Reds/Topres. ><

I normally touch type, so no need to look at keys - but when learning Dvorak I find it helps, at least until I make it to at least 80wpm.

I see...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: noGG on Sun, 26 February 2012, 01:15:44
Nice to see a healthy interest in SC2 here. :D I'm a gold level terran but I haven't played Season 6 yet. I'm more macro oriented in the sense that most of my wins come from me outmacroing my opponent then running him over in one attack with superior unit comp and upgrades. Micro, mechanics, decision making, and crisis management all are far behind though. :P Right now I'm stuck in another phase where I'm having trouble finding motivation to ladder so now all I do is watch the pros play lol. Anyone here one of those people that LOVE LOVE LOVE to watch SC2 but have never played a single game?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: yttrium on Sun, 26 February 2012, 01:19:39
Quote from: noGG;526426
Nice to see a healthy interest in SC2 here. :D I'm a gold level terran but I haven't played Season 6 yet. I'm more macro oriented in the sense that most of my wins come from me outmacroing my opponent then running him over in one attack with superior unit comp and upgrades. Micro, mechanics, decision making, and crisis management all are far behind though. :P Right now I'm stuck in another phase where I'm having trouble finding motivation to ladder so now all I do is watch the pros play lol. Anyone here one of those people that LOVE LOVE LOVE to watch SC2 but have never played a single game?

I went through that phase, but friends wanted to do some 2v2s and I got back into it.

Speaking of which, anyone up for ladder tonight?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sun, 26 February 2012, 01:41:46
Quote from: noGG;526426
Nice to see a healthy interest in SC2 here. :D I'm a gold level terran but I haven't played Season 6 yet. I'm more macro oriented in the sense that most of my wins come from me outmacroing my opponent then running him over in one attack with superior unit comp and upgrades. Micro, mechanics, decision making, and crisis management all are far behind though. :P Right now I'm stuck in another phase where I'm having trouble finding motivation to ladder so now all I do is watch the pros play lol. Anyone here one of those people that LOVE LOVE LOVE to watch SC2 but have never played a single game?

Thats how all games should be up till bout plat...solid mechanics + Amove = win
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: yttrium on Sun, 26 February 2012, 02:33:52
Quote from: hazeluff;526462
Thats how all games should be up till bout plat...solid mechanics + Amove = win

If only it weren't that way, eh?

A move should stop being used after silver.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sun, 26 February 2012, 02:46:39
The most important part of the game is macro. And the main difference of skill in that range is "Macro".

After plat its more about micro:
good positioning
using spells (fungal/emp/storm)
drop play
burrow play
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: yttrium on Sun, 26 February 2012, 03:01:58
Oh no, I know what you mean and agree, I just hate seeing MMM a move being used in plat, and even gold.

Dayum shame, Jimmy.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sun, 26 February 2012, 10:31:56
Quote from: yttrium;526517
Oh no, I know what you mean and agree, I just hate seeing MMM a move being used in plat, and even gold.

Dayum shame, Jimmy.

was protoss when I was in that range ... Just build sentry and rush colosis. GG
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: yttrium on Sun, 26 February 2012, 12:02:34
I play diamonds now, but yeah, back then MMM was insane.

Still is of course, if you don't know how to counter (read: fungal).

First game played with new keyboard: 30 minute macro game, ended up taking the win! ZvZ on Metalopolis, hell yeah.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sun, 26 February 2012, 12:14:52
Quote from: yttrium;526835
I play diamonds now, but yeah, back then MMM was insane.

Still is of course, if you don't know how to counter (read: fungal).

First game played with new keyboard: 30 minute macro game, ended up taking the win! ZvZ on Metalopolis, hell yeah.

Winning a ZvZ when you're behind 2 bases...Thats what I did...30 minute game reaching hive tech. Won with upgrade/composition and really good fungals.

MMM is countered with mass bane.[video=youtube;jcQedw7R1zk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcQedw7R1zk[/video]

Unless there are alot of marauders. Then the counter is Mass Muta. (Counter MM with MM eh?)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: yttrium on Sun, 26 February 2012, 15:18:58
Banelings are good, unless they're getting medivacs and simply lift + scan burrowed ones.

Rarely do banelings work for me, infestors always do the trick.

EDIT: I ended up winning that game not with good fungals, but with superior upgrades, micro, and placement. It really came down to just mass roach vs mass roach, and while fungals can be good, they're pretty damn ineffective.

I also had five bases when he only had three, so as my roaches died, I was able to spam more and get them to the fight before my army fully died; "the 300 zerg push".
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: noGG on Sun, 26 February 2012, 18:47:04
Banelings. HA. I'd love to see a Zerg try to break my immortal mech army. Try baneling busting me with 14+ siege with +2/+1. Anyway, I have to disagree on the whole mechanics + a move = win in platinium league. I've played platinum league and I haven't really found any standard builds. Always see stupid builds like 2 base ONLY MUTALISK and they just camp my production with 36+ mutas. I try to practice standard builds and stuff I see from pros but that stuff usually doesn't work if say a toss goes immortal/zealot/void ray/dark templar or some other weird ass unit comp.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sun, 26 February 2012, 20:00:40
Quote from: noGG;527359
Banelings. HA. I'd love to see a Zerg try to break my immortal mech army. Try baneling busting me with 14+ siege with +2/+1. Anyway, I have to disagree on the whole mechanics + a move = win in platinium league. I've played platinum league and I haven't really found any standard builds. Always see stupid builds like 2 base ONLY MUTALISK and they just camp my production with 36+ mutas. I try to practice standard builds and stuff I see from pros but that stuff usually doesn't work if say a toss goes immortal/zealot/void ray/dark templar or some other weird ass unit comp.

Platinum is about going for solid macro, but you need to know what to build. Its pointless if you're building the wrong units. Platinum I say, is still a point where solid macro is more key that the cute little micro you do with units. Obviously its different from the lower leagues. They key I think round the plat level (at least for me) it was picking the right units and solid macro. (for zerg this whole thing is a bit different because we're deciding between army vs economy). Say he went only mutas. make like 4 thors. One at each base and one to push out and marine tank. What can mutalisk do? Nothing. Its key to know what you're opponent's plan/build/units are and play accordingly. But I reckon if you macroed solidly enough and made marines only, you'd win.

Quote from: yttrium;527071
Banelings are good, unless they're getting medivacs and simply lift + scan burrowed ones.

Rarely do banelings work for me, infestors always do the trick.

EDIT: I ended up winning that game not with good fungals, but with superior upgrades, micro, and placement. It really came down to just mass roach vs mass roach, and while fungals can be good, they're pretty damn ineffective.

I also had five bases when he only had three, so as my roaches died, I was able to spam more and get them to the fight before my army fully died; "the 300 zerg push".

Fungals used to be sooo good. Especially because terrans didn't know how to deal with it. Now I feel like, I rather skip infestors until I had my broodlords. I was huge fan of Destiny's Infestor style and i kept playing it vs toss and vs terran and it paid out well for me. Then everyone learned how to spread and no I'm back with ling bane muta, and I hate playing that...I've been trying the roach vs terran style, not working out... = /
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: RColinTaylor on Sun, 26 February 2012, 22:19:37
Errrr I changed my name to Bangarang... so if you see that in the Geekhack room that is me.

[video=youtube;xvxWzrmIN9A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvxWzrmIN9A&feature=related[/video]
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Sun, 26 February 2012, 22:23:29
Quote from: RColinTaylor;527576
Errrr I changed my name to Bangarang... so if you see that in the Geekhack room that is me.

[video=youtube;xvxWzrmIN9A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvxWzrmIN9A&feature=related[/video]


That is a solid username.  I've used "rufio" before.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: RColinTaylor on Sun, 26 February 2012, 22:35:44
Quote from: hashbaz;527581
That is a solid username.  I've used "rufio" before.

Rufio is my throwaway SC2 account.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: noGG on Mon, 27 February 2012, 19:12:31
Quote from: hazeluff;527433
Platinum is about going for solid macro, but you need to know what to build. Its pointless if you're building the wrong units. Platinum I say, is still a point where solid macro is more key that the cute little micro you do with units. Obviously its different from the lower leagues. They key I think round the plat level (at least for me) it was picking the right units and solid macro. (for zerg this whole thing is a bit different because we're deciding between army vs economy). Say he went only mutas. make like 4 thors. One at each base and one to push out and marine tank. What can mutalisk do? Nothing. Its key to know what you're opponent's plan/build/units are and play accordingly. But I reckon if you macroed solidly enough and made marines only, you'd win.



Fungals used to be sooo good. Especially because terrans didn't know how to deal with it. Now I feel like, I rather skip infestors until I had my broodlords. I was huge fan of Destiny's Infestor style and i kept playing it vs toss and vs terran and it paid out well for me. Then everyone learned how to spread and no I'm back with ling bane muta, and I hate playing that...I've been trying the roach vs terran style, not working out... = /

Wanna know why I don't make 4 thors? Because by the time the mutas hit, even with a standard build that goes for Thors in unit comp, I won't have the thors out in time. And any idiot can magic box mutas and with 36 mutas, it doesn't matter how many Thors I have. Mobility will win in the end. Sure I can keep my whole army together in base but then I lose map control. The key problem I think I have is that I try to do standard builds that work in Masters and up but since my opponents (usually upper gold to the very bottom of platinum) have such odd builds, timings, and transitions. I'd have to dedicate everything to scouting.

Let's say I'm playing vs. Zerg and he goes hatch first. What' the appropriate response? Reactor hellions, duh. I do normal damage with the hellions, do scouting, gain some map control, pressure his 3rd, etc. Then all of a sudden he gets brood lords before there should even be brood lords on the field. I'm talking about people that have their timings so off and use such funky builds it could take out a pro unaware just because it's mechanically impossible at that time to win. Or say against protoss. The right units to build are usually marine/marauder/medivac/ghost and maybe some vikings thrown in if he has colossi. What do I do against someone that gets a little bit of everything. Zealot/stalker/dt/void ray. Weird unit comps like that. It's just impossible to prepare for EVERYTHING if I'm trying to play standard (save orbital energy for scans instead of mules? and let my macro slip? no thanks, I'm not counting on the slight possibility of DTs at SOME point on the game to determine whether or not I should drop mules).
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Mon, 27 February 2012, 19:37:37
Quote from: noGG;528625
Wanna know why I don't make 4 thors? Because by the time the mutas hit, even with a standard build that goes for Thors in unit comp, I won't have the thors out in time. And any idiot can magic box mutas and with 36 mutas, it doesn't matter how many Thors I have. Mobility will win in the end. Sure I can keep my whole army together in base but then I lose map control. The key problem I think I have is that I try to do standard builds that work in Masters and up but since my opponents (usually upper gold to the very bottom of platinum) have such odd builds, timings, and transitions. I'd have to dedicate everything to scouting.

Let's say I'm playing vs. Zerg and he goes hatch first. What' the appropriate response? Reactor hellions, duh. I do normal damage with the hellions, do scouting, gain some map control, pressure his 3rd, etc. Then all of a sudden he gets brood lords before there should even be brood lords on the field. I'm talking about people that have their timings so off and use such funky builds it could take out a pro unaware just because it's mechanically impossible at that time to win. Or say against protoss. The right units to build are usually marine/marauder/medivac/ghost and maybe some vikings thrown in if he has colossi. What do I do against someone that gets a little bit of everything. Zealot/stalker/dt/void ray. Weird unit comps like that. It's just impossible to prepare for EVERYTHING if I'm trying to play standard (save orbital energy for scans instead of mules? and let my macro slip? no thanks, I'm not counting on the slight possibility of DTs at SOME point on the game to determine whether or not I should drop mules).

The muta thing, I can't understand. for more than 20 mutas, it would be quite late. So you'll have had plenty of time to prepare, marine/turret + thor means mutas can't go in that area. Thors are a late stage thing, if he's really comitting to them make more, but one or two usually is enough if you see some but not stupid amounts. There is always a terran timing vs zerg before mutas come out, hit that timing if you're have trouble against muta builds.

Your number of 36 mutas seems very exagerated, it's either quite late into the game and he's made that many mutas, in which case, why didn't you pressure him so he'd stop making those things...He can only make bane/roach or muta, not both. If it's exagerated, you'll be fine with thor + turret. or thor + some marines.

Tip vs zerg. Open up your solid marine tank, and push. If its not a standard ling bane muta/ roach infestor/etc builds then he'll die. If it fails, you force less mutas/more units and less econ. You do need to set up correctly and do the push decently obviously. If he's doing some stupid broodlord rush, he's already lost to this "pressure".

There are solid builds, like marine tank medivac/mech. They are solid. Then you have your cutesy builds that throw in banshees and ravens and such. But I mean those have some holes in your defense. Hatch first can be reacted to with a variety of things and not just reactor helion. You can one up him and go CC first/ CC after rax, there is no ONE build to go against other builds.

As for substandard builds like a "everything composition", its about playing reactionary or just having a better composition. Its not easy to react to everything you see in time and sometimes you see it too late.

I recomend saving at least one scan for a chance DTs are coming in/ when you are moving out. Getting caught off guard is just terrible.

I know I don't play terran, so I can't be of great help. But as a zerg, I throw up preemptive evo chamber/lair (for dection) + roach warren against noob terrans. Because I don't know if theyre doign the stupid 20 BFH build and I don't know if they decide to do the 2 starport banshee at 12 minutes in build. But I have such a solid macro over them, that I can afford those resources going into useless precautions.

But I know how you feel about lower level builds. I've lost the stupidest things that just don't make sense. Guy makes tons of spines then all ins you...that kind of **** is just wtf. If I were better I'd hold it off, since he should still be behind in resources if he built spines and assuming I macroed around his level. So I should be able to get units to react to what he's done and still be in a decent position.  

There are builds that are general purpose and are general purpose cos they are very safe to use, you might just be slightly behind on the scouting or just slightly behind in macro. Scouting is important, checking army compositions/buildings/positions/bases. Its all very important.

GLHF, practice makes perfect, If you wanna have some practice against me, I would love to help you out. Not sure if the underlying problem is the other people or maybe some flaw in your gameplay. It might be a small combination of both. Trust me on the "solid" builds thing tho, they are solid (or at least relatively more stable).

I got to Plat from Bronze with protoss learning to 4gate and 3gate expand...and learned that if I just made more units/colosis, I win. I got from plat to diamond with zerg learning how to react to different plays, it was a pain, zergs are more reactive than terran/protoss, and it too a lot of getting used to all the scouting and choosing the right units. I also learned to execute solid builds really fine up till like past the 8 minute mark.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Creizai on Sat, 03 March 2012, 17:29:00
So I'm top 20 in diamond on 2 accounts but I see a GLARING issue with my play, My macro is falling off during certain attacks, and I'm not toss so I can't just warp in round instantly or have a millino units pop.  I know its easy to say build scvs and build units while micro but when i'm in the thick thick of it I drop off bad.  Any tips?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hashbaz on Sat, 03 March 2012, 17:32:07
How is having your barracks and factories on hotkeys different than hatcheries on hotkeys?  I would say it is easier for T and Z to macro during a battle than P, since P has to find a powered area to warp in at.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: dreamingftw on Sat, 03 March 2012, 20:02:26
Quote from: hashbaz;534201
How is having your barracks and factories on hotkeys different than hatcheries on hotkeys?  I would say it is easier for T and Z to macro during a battle than P, since P has to find a powered area to warp in at.

What I've been doing lately is bringing a warp prism along with my army and warp em in when I attack. A lot more convenient when you attack. BTW, I'm always down for some Masters games. I rank 1 and 2Masters 2s and 3s.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Sun, 04 March 2012, 21:05:16
Quote from: Creizai;534196
So I'm top 20 in diamond on 2 accounts but I see a GLARING issue with my play, My macro is falling off during certain attacks, and I'm not toss so I can't just warp in round instantly or have a millino units pop.  I know its easy to say build scvs and build units while micro but when i'm in the thick thick of it I drop off bad.  Any tips?

The simple fix would be to queue up a ton of units on your production facility as you go into battle. And if you can during. Otherwise it's about awareness that you need to be making units during a fight. Practice it.

Day[9] tip: Practice games where you only care about macroing correctly. Don't care if you don't micro, just make sure you are making units, get it stuck in you that you need to make units all the time.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Glukos on Mon, 05 March 2012, 08:30:50
Which keycaps do pro players remove to play awesomish?
Proofs pls.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Mon, 05 March 2012, 08:33:05
Quote from: Glukos;535642
Which keycaps do pro players remove to play awesomish?
Proofs pls.

I've seen things like windows caps and \| removed. No proofs, just take my word for it.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: andyhoang on Fri, 16 March 2012, 23:56:20
Kilos.905!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crackensan on Mon, 19 March 2012, 09:12:10
Well, since I'm here.... :D

Cracken.432, Gold Zerg player on NA.

And did anyone see Stephano last night?  That last game against Polt was insane.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vurt on Mon, 19 March 2012, 13:11:18
vurt.276 - Pimp League [Gold/Plat] Protoss/Zerg, depending what I feel like playing. Zerg macro EZ. Protoss A Move army EZ. Help me pick a race!!
But lets get real here...

[ATTACH=CONFIG]44912[/ATTACH]
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Mon, 19 March 2012, 13:22:34
Quote from: vurt;550650
vurt.276 - Pimp League [Gold/Plat] Protoss/Zerg, depending what I feel like playing. Zerg macro EZ. Protoss A Move army EZ. Help me pick a race!!
But lets get real here...

(Attachment) 44912[/ATTACH]


Random. Best race ever.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vurt on Mon, 19 March 2012, 13:24:42
But Terran sucks.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Mon, 19 March 2012, 13:26:01
Quote from: vurt;550666
But Terran sucks.

Clearly you're not making enough of one of the following units:

Marine
Marauder
Helion
Banshee
Tank
Thor

Mass them and win. EZ
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vurt on Mon, 19 March 2012, 13:33:10
tbh Terran isn't fun to play for me. I don't like to micro bio/manage tanks/manage drops. I prefer to warp in mass zealots/archons and A-move to victory.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: yttrium on Mon, 19 March 2012, 13:34:02
Sucks != Hard.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Mon, 19 March 2012, 13:40:52
Quote from: vurt;550677
tbh Terran isn't fun to play for me. I don't like to micro bio/manage tanks/manage drops. I prefer to warp in mass zealots/archons and A-move to victory.

You've got problems. There is nothing easier than making 1base-6rax marine all-in. I won some diamond games when I accidentally randomed.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vurt on Mon, 19 March 2012, 13:45:58
Terran is hard at high levels, but that isn't the reason I dislike the race. It's a playstyle/mechanics thing. I really like Zerg mechanics, and how the race works and relies so much on scouting and reactionary play. Protoss is a race where you have the ability to control game flow a bit more, and unit composition really matters late game, which I also enjoy quite a bit. I have definitely played more Protoss games and I'm probably more comfortable with Protoss builds. Additionally, it's so easy to die as Zerg early game to timings if you don't prepare properly. But if my opponent doesn't ever attack and lets me take 3-4 base with 80 drones...it's GG.

Edit: There is nothing easier than all-inning on any race, but I don't like to play cheesy styles. I prefer straight up games/macro styles.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Mon, 19 March 2012, 13:50:16
Quote from: vurt;550685
Terran is hard at high levels, but that isn't the reason I dislike the race. It's a playstyle/mechanics thing. I really like Zerg mechanics, and how the race works and relies so much on scouting and reactionary play. Protoss is a race where you have the ability to control game flow a bit more, and unit composition really matters late game, which I also enjoy quite a bit. I have definitely played more Protoss games and I'm probably more comfortable with Protoss builds. Additionally, it's so easy to die as Zerg early game to timings if you don't prepare properly. But if my opponent doesn't ever attack and lets me take 3-4 base with 80 drones...it's GG.

Edit: There is nothing easier than all-inning on any race, but I don't like to play cheesy styles. I prefer straight up games/macro styles.

I like throwing in the cheese once in a while. Not very often, but I throw them in.

I play zerg/toss and I know how you feel about playing terran. I absolutely hate playing it. Except when I do wonky builds.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vurt on Mon, 19 March 2012, 14:13:37
Terran Go To Builds for a Sure Fire Win:

2 port banshee
Proxy 11/11 rax
6rax 1 base TLO build
1/1/1
7rax reaper

Or if you meet EG IdrA on ladder...1 base battlecruiser!! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ywZBxNFgqI)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crackensan on Tue, 20 March 2012, 09:46:44
If your having issues with Terran.... just make sure your "A" key is functioning.  When in doubt, make more Marines! :D

No, seriously, 10 medivacs+ makes a ball of marines neigh invulnerable.  It's disgusting.  Especially when I get down to killing the last few Marines..... oh man..... unless you have some great burst damage units, and you can position the Marines right, it's impossible. :D

Though with Protoss.... when behind, Dark Shrine! :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: yttrium on Tue, 20 March 2012, 11:17:07
Quote from: Crackensan;551410
10 medivacs+ makes a ball of marines neigh invulnerable

And I was like... BANELINGS BANELINGS BANELINGS OHHHH!

Edit: And on that note, infestors and ultralisks work beautifully too. Roach+Hydra can be good as long as you have the +1 range upgrade for the hydras and have them focus down the medivacs while the roaches soak up the fire (with some armor upgrades).

Also, brood lords are great as long as you have something to soak up the fire.

Of course, zergling + baneling is great versus a bioball like that - simply run past the marines to flank them with speedlings. If you time it right you can surround and trap the marines (except for where you come from) just as the banelings meet with them. The marines are basically thrown into a cup while sulfuric acid is poured all over them. Oh, and you get to hear their agonizing screams... I love that...
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crackensan on Tue, 20 March 2012, 11:24:03
haha, Yeah, I know.  Every once in a while I find my self in these really odd situations where I don't have them.  :/
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: vurt on Tue, 20 March 2012, 11:33:20
Quote from: Crackensan;551410
neigh

[video=youtube;ZwOptdOA-i0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwOptdOA-i0[/video]
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crackensan on Tue, 20 March 2012, 12:27:18
is there an official geek hack channel I can join?  I was wondering where you guys hide on battle.net
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Tue, 20 March 2012, 20:02:53
Quote from: Crackensan;551546
is there an official geek hack channel I can join?  I was wondering where you guys hide on battle.net

Yes there is one. = D

"GeekHack"

Who would have guessed?
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Crackensan on Wed, 21 March 2012, 17:20:07
Yeah... should have just tried that.... ;_;
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: augusto2112 on Thu, 05 April 2012, 12:53:05
Hi guys!
I've been playing SC2 for a year now. It is my first RTS. I started playing as protoss and then switched to zerg and never regreted it. I'm a low Diamond level zerg and a platinum level protoss.
ID: Omnipotent.692 (Zerg)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: ForestFunK on Sun, 15 April 2012, 10:33:52
You might get stomped in your placement matches. But after that you will be placed against enemies with equal "performace". That's the good thing about the ladder.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Fir3Chi3f on Thu, 19 April 2012, 00:47:29
Reporting in!

Fir3Chi3f#1304
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/352645/1/FireChief/

Yeah, I've come from OCN as well :P
Figured I've visited enough researching keyboards and whatnot. Just now exploring a bit.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: zeDoktor on Wed, 25 April 2012, 16:46:16
zeDoktor#638
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/2944317/1/zeDoktor/

I'm pretty terrible but I love the game. I went to MLG Orlando last year and completely fell in love with Starcraft and eSports.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Mysteric on Thu, 26 April 2012, 18:13:40
Mine is Daniel#2186 on the EU server. I'm silver league. Any of you EU GH'ers feel free to add me, just make sure to drop me a message and tell me who it is :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Ekaros on Fri, 27 April 2012, 14:52:07
Now if I only could get game to install on my XP machine...

http://eu.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/2298038/1/Ekaros/
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Namkung on Fri, 27 April 2012, 15:20:37
Quote from: dante;574906
Are their quite a bit of noobs that are available to play on SC2 or am I going to get my butt handed to me in just about any game I play?

I'm a noob myself; I still have to build a new computer, acquire a new monitor, swap out my trackball for a mouse; etc... starting at ground zero.


Edit: any issues playing SC2 with a Noppoo Choc Mini?

playing with choc mini should be just fine, granted you are used to its layout / can get used to it.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: stereophonic on Fri, 27 April 2012, 22:15:36
Yo yo, add me up.: SackPatrol.702 Diamond Protss.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: ryuzBIM on Sat, 28 April 2012, 07:25:40
Hi, i'm RYUZbim #583 random plat on EU server :)
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Ekaros on Sat, 28 April 2012, 08:00:31
I think I'm really bad in this game ;D

Finaly got it installed though.
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Desu on Wed, 30 May 2012, 15:27:01
I'll add on my bnet account later this week -- but just wanted to say...that last GSL final was AMAZINGGG! Go Squirtle!!
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Mysteric on Sat, 02 June 2012, 12:15:34
Every time I go on and join the Geekhack channel (EU), there's only ever me and one other person in it :(
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: NSMarkop on Sat, 21 July 2012, 18:19:35
Just posting here to see if anyone is interested in playing. I don't really know anyone that plays SC2, which has resulted in me slacking a bit on playing lately (and watching too many streams, haha).

NeedReality.408 on the NA server (Gold league Terran, though I want to play Protoss):
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/3262275/1/NeedReality/

Also, awhile ago someone posted a custom division for GeekHack on SC2Ranks:
http://sc2ranks.com/c/11594/geekhack/

I'm not sure if people know about it, because the post with it was removed the following day due to a prior forum rollback (along with my first post and feedback at the time :[)
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nar on Sun, 22 July 2012, 06:45:30
If you go on the geekhack channel on SC2 you can ask people to play there. I'm a gold random (XskieS on the division) so if I'm on I'd be up to play with you.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: viasacra89 on Sun, 22 July 2012, 11:23:40
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/849187/1/viasacra/

Add me.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: M0rph3us on Sun, 22 July 2012, 20:27:51
I'm very out of practice, but I'd be down to play with some people and get back into RTS more. I only stopped playing because of lack of people to play with.

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1159860/1/Brentiss/
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nar on Mon, 23 July 2012, 02:29:29
I added both of you two.

For future reference, anyone can add themselves to the division by clicking on Manage characters. You only need to be the owner of the division to remove someone.
Its just a handy list to keep track of all the GH SC2 players.

Main thing is hang out in the Geekhack chatroom on SC2.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: derb2k2 on Mon, 23 July 2012, 20:08:59
welp. i'll be joining the starcraft ranks soon when my copy arrives. It's one of the main reasons i got this new keyboard too. Can't wait to play. I was honestly intrigued by Destiny's stream when hearing all that clicking and clacking from his DAS. Glad I found mechanicals again.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: NewbieOneKenobi on Wed, 25 July 2012, 17:11:28
Hi guys!
I've been playing SC2 for a year now. It is my first RTS. I started playing as protoss and then switched to zerg and never regreted it. I'm a low Diamond level zerg and a platinum level protoss.
ID: Omnipotent.692 (Zerg)

Hi! Impressive. I've played RTS since Dune 2 and can't make it past gold league, mostly due to mechanics. ;)
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: kwstas on Thu, 26 July 2012, 07:07:19
that's great stuff!
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Kronen on Sun, 29 July 2012, 11:22:40
Kronen.965 here :-).  Plat-Dia zerg here.  Been working my way up through the leagues for a couple months now.  This game actually was the impetus for getting a mechanical keyboard in the first place.

I'm always up for games! PM me anytime
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Kronen on Sun, 29 July 2012, 11:25:04
Also, if you're new and looking to improve, I can't recommend enough FilterSC on youtube and TheJakatak method and stream.  Both those guys are really good and helpful.  Opened my eyes to a whole new level of benchmarking my play.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: derb2k2 on Mon, 30 July 2012, 06:22:46
Also, if you're new and looking to improve, I can't recommend enough FilterSC on youtube and TheJakatak method and stream.  Both those guys are really good and helpful.  Opened my eyes to a whole new level of benchmarking my play.

will def look into this. I'm rather new to RTS genre and have started tinkering with the mechanics and all that. I'm wondering is people actually modify their keybinds from what the default is though.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Kronen on Mon, 30 July 2012, 07:04:30
Filter's stuff can be found at these sites: http://www.youtube.com/filtersc,  http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=330787

It's the more comprehensive program designed to get you to diamond with some efficiency

Jakatak is here: http://www.twitch.tv/thejakatak

Jakatak's build is great to practice good macro habits, and can get you to diamond.  Basically it's a fun thing to do that doesn't require as much thought or strategy, but makes you develop good habits with econ and macro management.  I use it to warm up fingers before sessions and also to cool off at the end of the day if I want to play a couple games before bed, but don't want to get the adrenaline spike.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: NSMarkop on Tue, 31 July 2012, 17:45:29
Also, if you're new and looking to improve, I can't recommend enough FilterSC on youtube and TheJakatak method and stream.  Both those guys are really good and helpful.  Opened my eyes to a whole new level of benchmarking my play.

will def look into this. I'm rather new to RTS genre and have started tinkering with the mechanics and all that. I'm wondering is people actually modify their keybinds from what the default is though.

In terms of hotkeys it really is about what is comfortable to you. From what I gather, the standard hotkeys are good for someone switching from Brood War but they aren't very efficient.

If you go to edit your hotkeys in game, you'll see that two other options offered are Grid and Modified Grid - both of these are imo a lot better than the default (I use Grid) and they are a bit easier to get used to.

However, you can go farther and specialize your hotkeys completely if you want to go for something that is "optimal" for you; Artosis just released a video concerning hotkeys (
) and there is also a project going on called "TheCore" which offers optimized layouts depending on race, mouse grip, etc. ( http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=341878 ). Go for what feels best for you because being able to move quickly for long periods of time can be extremely helpful once you get more experienced.

Don't think your hotkeys will make you a pro overnight though, working on your mechanics/macro is much more important. I've learned from FilterSC's tutorials that Kronen mentioned and I definitely recommend them for you to understand how important it is to set benchmarks and focus on macro - unit control (micro) comes in later.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Kronen on Wed, 01 August 2012, 16:24:16
 :o AHHHHHHH!!!  yayayayay!!!!    ;D  :D ;D :P ;D ;D

[attach=1]

After months and months of working, I finally got placed into diamond!!  Now I get to have my wife buy me that annoying Jinx t-shirt!!

aaaaahhhh... KK having some scotch!!!  Screw it if it's only 5:30.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: NewbieOneKenobi on Thu, 02 August 2012, 13:56:38
:o AHHHHHHH!!!  yayayayay!!!!    ;D  :D ;D :P ;D ;D

(Attachment Link)

After months and months of working, I finally got placed into diamond!!  Now I get to have my wife buy me that annoying Jinx t-shirt!!

aaaaahhhh... KK having some scotch!!!  Screw it if it's only 5:30.

Congrats!

What a cool thing to see on your screen, by the way! I've never even got my platinum one (though I've got my gold one twice ;)). Looking forward to playing again. Hah. You keep the notes on a second screen or something like that? I had my builds printed and glued to an unused second monitor.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Thu, 02 August 2012, 14:47:04
:o AHHHHHHH!!!  yayayayay!!!!    ;D  :D ;D :P ;D ;D

(Attachment Link)

After months and months of working, I finally got placed into diamond!!  Now I get to have my wife buy me that annoying Jinx t-shirt!!

aaaaahhhh... KK having some scotch!!!  Screw it if it's only 5:30.

Grats! I've lost all hope in moving up from diamond = ( Too much rage.

Anyone hating the new UI in 1.5?
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: sawedust on Thu, 02 August 2012, 20:42:50
:o AHHHHHHH!!!  yayayayay!!!!    ;D  :D ;D :P ;D ;D

(Attachment Link)

After months and months of working, I finally got placed into diamond!!  Now I get to have my wife buy me that annoying Jinx t-shirt!!

aaaaahhhh... KK having some scotch!!!  Screw it if it's only 5:30.

Grats! I've lost all hope in moving up from diamond = ( Too much rage.

Anyone hating the new UI in 1.5?

I'm not a fan of the UI at all and overall, the patch. A lot of things that are game-related ended up broken because of the patch.

The only good thing that came out of the patch yesterday was this little gem:

http://www.twitch.tv/sawesc/b/327123951

Otherwise, I'd rather see the old layout where everything still worked fine and I had my Stronger Team Color mod.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: hazeluff on Mon, 06 August 2012, 06:24:47
Ahahaha nice victory dance.

My favourite thing about the patch is the workers going all the way around the nexus/cc/hatch instead of the shortest path.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: DanGWanG on Wed, 08 August 2012, 11:07:40
Started playing SC2 again....hit me up if anyone wants to practice =)  Also, are there any new strats I've missed since 2-3 months ago?  New playing styles or anything?  I'm Toss main, but mostly play random in multiplayer.

Info:  GGbrO.704 / Career Diamond 1's and multiplayer

Can a mod or the OP update my character info?  I changed it since then...
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: wcstick on Sun, 19 August 2012, 14:20:11
Just started again after a five-month hiatus. I feel the need to use my keyboard because it feels so good and Starcraft is a keyboard-intensive game. Anyway, I used to be gold but I'm more of a silver player. Add the fact that I like to mess around and I'm pretty much silver. Main is Protoss but I alternate with Zerg. I prefer team games (3s mostly).

Evocrazy.343
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Okita on Sun, 19 August 2012, 18:26:44
My name is OKITA on bnet. You may or may not find me in reddit or teamliquid channels :D
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: duq on Sat, 06 October 2012, 14:47:10
We should get another stream tourney up again :)
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Rumudiez on Wed, 10 October 2012, 20:33:11
Only if it's not double-elimination-5-day-long-single-elimination-finals. Yeah? yeah.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: CKTofu on Wed, 10 October 2012, 22:26:34
Well, I'm CKTofu.398 . Also, I suck. I used to be less mediocre than I am now, though...

EDIT:
I'm very out of practice, but I'd be down to play with some people and get back into RTS more. I only stopped playing because of lack of people to play with.

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/1159860/1/Brentiss/
What race do you play? I'd love to have people to play with.

EDIT2: I've finally started getting back into it. At this rate I'll be back out of bronze and closer to where I should be soon!
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nolliepoper on Thu, 11 October 2012, 00:31:00
1v1 Diamond Protoss. Played BW, SC2 beta and still play WoL actively but sad I have not been invited into the HoTS beta... yet.
nolliepoper:830
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: Johan on Fri, 12 October 2012, 14:07:17
I, Im derp. 167, I play Zerg in Eu. Feel free to message me!
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: boost on Fri, 12 October 2012, 14:45:19
Someone teach me how to play -_-
Title: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: duq on Fri, 12 October 2012, 18:33:21
Boost! What race do you play? I can help if you play Zerg.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: baldgye on Wed, 17 October 2012, 15:19:51
been playing since the WoL beta and now 'playing' the HotS beta... I'm a plat protoss who probally should be in dia but I'm too lazy...

I'd post a link to my main acc but I can't becasue I got a new phone and lolauthenticator reset .... ugh


BALDGYE
#628
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: whiteduck on Sat, 24 November 2012, 22:19:44
grebnesorr 905 NA, dropped from masters this season from lack of games... T.T
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: nodicaL on Sun, 25 November 2012, 06:52:28
Quite new to StarCraft 2 just started playing a little while ago.  Just working on my macro at the moment since everyone seems to say that is the most important aspect of SC2.
Haven't even played my placement matches, but really enjoying playing against my friends in Customs.

Server: AM
ID: nodicaL.674
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: MPAIznogood on Mon, 26 November 2012, 08:07:09
MPAIznogood #728 on both EU and NA

The proud founder of clan MPA ( Minutes Per Action ). Almost all 70+ members are over 30 years old and our oldest so far, is 61. We range from casual gamers, Bronze to Masters league. Some prefer teamgames, others just play customs but most are into 1v1 . Check out our website www.mpastarcraft.org , look us up on our chat channel mpa in game or add me for a chat / game. Plat Protoss myself.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: tobr1an on Sat, 01 December 2012, 00:04:54
Pain.525 for NA
Don't play much but seems fun with geekhackers spamming there keyboards while playing.
Title: Re: StarCraft II with GeekHack
Post by: scytheR on Sat, 01 December 2012, 03:28:11
1v1 masters Protoss, currently rank 30-35ish, anyone wanna verse me I'm scytheR.248

EDIT: I'm on North American server :)