Author Topic: Optimus Maximus  (Read 6351 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline British

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 292
Optimus Maximus
« on: Fri, 02 July 2010, 12:04:24 »
Heh.

Can't wait to see what TrustedReviews has to say about this one (if they ever do such a review), out of pure curiosity :smile:

Offline Bruce

  • * Moderator
  • Posts: 31
    • http://www.keyboardco.com
Optimus Maximus
« Reply #1 on: Fri, 02 July 2010, 14:43:05 »
Good spot British.

It's quite a thing.
We're still finding more things to do with it after three days.
We've got some people with specialist applications who will pay the money if it does the job.
I find out next week :ohwell:

Offline muchadoaboutnothing

  • Posts: 667
Optimus Maximus
« Reply #2 on: Tue, 06 July 2010, 09:53:49 »
The word on the street is that it's not comfortable to type on but the display software does work pretty well.

Certainly the specialty applications will use it.

I saw some reviewers (on various sites; CNET was one of them) complaining that the screens were failing after a year, and they're ~$20 each.

Offline itlnstln

  • Posts: 7048
Optimus Maximus
« Reply #3 on: Tue, 06 July 2010, 10:00:15 »
MLs aren't horrible switches, but I wouldn't want to type on them all the time.


Offline muchadoaboutnothing

  • Posts: 667
Optimus Maximus
« Reply #4 on: Tue, 06 July 2010, 10:13:04 »
Quote from: itlnstln;199951
MLs aren't horrible switches, but I wouldn't want to type on them all the time.


Engadget said the force required to depress keys was high and that the force increased with key size:
Quote from: Engadget
Okay, why does typing on the Optimus suck, you ask? Well, although the keyboard uses mechanical switches and a lot of high quality components (evident when we pulled off some keys), and there is some clicky tactility to keypresses, as a whole it just requires way too much force to depress keys. And the larger the key, the more force is required, so enter is easier than space, but harder than tab. Let's put it this way, we sit around and type all day long and this thing wore us out in about 30 seconds to a minute. Carpal sufferers, beware.


It may be the implementation rather than the ML switches themselves.


Offline itlnstln

  • Posts: 7048
Optimus Maximus
« Reply #5 on: Tue, 06 July 2010, 10:24:08 »
MLs don't respond well to being pressed off-center, so with the larger keys, it's probably a little harder to press dead-on, thus they feel stiffer.  My only reference for MLs is my ML4100, so I don't really have a whole lot of experience with "larger" keys.


Offline Findecanor

  • Posts: 5036
  • Location: Koriko
Optimus Maximus
« Reply #6 on: Tue, 06 July 2010, 10:39:39 »
Seriously ... that setup ought to have some friction! They don't like ribbon cables, eh ...

Quote from: muchadoaboutnothing;199950
I saw some reviewers (on various sites; CNET was one of them) complaining that the screens were failing after a year, and they're ~$20 each.

If the connector is not what fails, it would be the screen. OLED isn't exactly known for long lifetime.

Offline Nonmouse

  • Posts: 298
Optimus Maximus
« Reply #7 on: Tue, 06 July 2010, 14:22:02 »
Quote from: itlnstln;199955
MLs don't respond well to being pressed off-center, so with the larger keys, it's probably a little harder to press dead-on, thus they feel stiffer.  My only reference for MLs is my ML4100, so I don't really have a whole lot of experience with "larger" keys.


There's also the fact that the keys are more widely spaced than normal- at least 20.2mm (width and height of keys) vs 19mm for a standard keyboard.  More stretching for keys at the outer edge, and more likelihood of pressing the inner edge of the key, since it's further out than usual.

Offline microsoft windows

  • Blue Troll of Death
  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 3621
  • President of geekhack.org
    • Get Internet Explorer 6
Optimus Maximus
« Reply #8 on: Thu, 15 July 2010, 15:56:04 »
Just get an IBM keyboard and you won't have to worry about all that.
CLICK HERE!     OFFICIAL PRESIDENT OF GEEKHACK.ORG    MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN MERRY CHRISTMAS

Offline ricercar

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 1697
  • Location: Silicon Valley
  • mostly abides
Optimus Maximus
« Reply #9 on: Thu, 15 July 2010, 21:14:14 »
Because all IBM keyboards are USB and have displays on the keys.
I trolled Geekhack and all I got was an eponymous SPOS.

Offline Phaedrus2129

  • Posts: 1131
Optimus Maximus
« Reply #10 on: Fri, 16 July 2010, 00:14:52 »
I didn't find the ML switches on my G84 that unpleasant. Main complaint is the sticking, which I'm still half-convinced is due to the keycap design, at least in part. If it weren't for the sticking, I'd rate it a bit better than the keyboard in my Thinkpad; as is, Lenovo's scissor switches trump Cherry's attempt at low-profile mechanical.

*Cue Cherry releasing a new line of excellent low profile switches, but they're only available in Cambodia and are then swiftly canceled because the project manager's wife broke up with him to go out with this guy:

*
Daily Driver: Noppoo Choc Mini
Currently own: IBM Model M 1391401 1988,  XArmor U9 prototype
Previously owned: Ricercar SPOS, IBM M13 92G7461 1994, XArmor U9BL, XArmor U9W prototype, Cherry G80-8200LPDUS, Cherry G84-4100, Compaq MX-11800, Chicony KB-5181 (SMK Monterey), Reveal KB-7061, Cirque Wave Keyboard (ergonomic rubber domes), NMB RT101 (rubber dome), Dell AT101W