geekhack

geekhack Marketplace => Interest Checks => Topic started by: Pylon on Wed, 20 May 2020, 14:06:20

Title: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (open-source; RNDKBD is doing a metal GB)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 20 May 2020, 14:06:20
This is an interest check for a compact 120% keyboard I'm working on, with a layout inspired by the Driftmechanics Austin (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=102542.0). This is the first custom keyboard I've designed, though I have a mechanical engineering background and have done other electronics projects before.


(https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/blob/main/graphics/bostonKLE.png?raw=true)
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=250896;image)

(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=282563;image)

== Update - March 19, 2022: ==
I am no longer planning on running a group buy for this board. The files have been open-sourced on GitHub (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston), with ordering guides for the 3D-printed version (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/tree/main/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/3D%20printed%20version) and CNC version  (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/tree/main/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/CNC%20version). Both versions have been prototyped. However, the files are provided as-is and cannot be guaranteed to be free from mistakes or defects. Order parts at your own risk.

 The CERN OHL-W license (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/blob/main/cern_ohl_w_v2.txt) permits 3rd-party group buys with no royalties or fees, but requires changes and derivative works to also be open-sourced. I may change the license to the Acheron OHL V1.4 (http://acheronproject.com/AOHL14/) license in the future, which has similar requirements.


RNDKBD currently sells (https://rndkbd.com/products/boston-keyboard-kit) the 3D-printed version as an in-stock item. I am not directly involved in that sale.

==  ==

There are two case options - 3D printed with several FR4 pieces, and a CNC version.

General Specifications:

3D-printed/FR4 version:

(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=250900;image)
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=250894;image)
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=250904;image)

CNC version:

(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=282561;image)
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=282567;image)
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=282573;image)

The layout for this was inspired by the Austin and also by the 7-row Thinkpad keyboard (http://www.notebookreview.com/picture/?f=60846) you find on Thinkpads of the T420 generation and older. The name is somewhat a pun off Austin since the layout is derived from it, and because I grew up (and currently live) near the city Boston, Massachusetts.

This project uses the open-source Acheron library from the Acheron project (http://acheronproject.com/). KiCAD PCB files are available at my Github below. STL files and STEP files of the 3D-printed version are available here below under the CERN OHL-W (which is fairly permissive), and you are free to use the files to make one yourself.
https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston

Many thanks to Gondolindrim for the Acheron project and for feedback on the early PCBs, and to the designers of the Driftmechanics Austin (Driftingbunnies, PheonixStarr and Gondolindrim) from which this was derived. Also thank you to all 129 people that filled out the old IC form - your feedback was definitely appreciated. At this point I've collected more than enough data, so I took down the form.

MouserPounder made a signature graphic if people want to put these in their signatures (this has a picture of the older prototype)

Code: [Select]
[url=https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=106501.0][img width=304 height=120]https://i.imgur.com/LYOA5Fp.jpg[/img][/url]
Technofrikus designed an alternative 3D-printed case derived from the files of the CNC version, and also designed a case with a 4° typing angle. The files for those are available on Technofrikus' GitHub (https://github.com/Technofrikus/Boston-Case).
(https://github.com/Technofrikus/Boston-Case/blob/main/Photos/DSCF7709%201.jpg?raw=true)

(post revisions)
May 20, 2020 - Initial post
May 20, 2020 - Replaced renders with ones that accurately depict the seam in the middle
May 29, 2020 - Moved F-keys over rightward slightly. Bottom weight is now aluminum instead of brass as the keyboard is pretty heavy to begin with.
June 2, 2020 - Corrected some references to the Austin
June 19, 2020 - Added pictures of prototype (without LEDs or rotary encoder installed)
June 20, 2020 - Added signature link that MousePounder made 
July 4, 2020 - Updated signature link
July 12, 2020 - Reorganized feature list, added plate files to Github
August 16, 2020 - Shortened title
September 3, 2020 - Revised post significantly. Removed a lot of outdated info. Added pictures of the 3D-printed version
September 5, 2020 - Fixed required build area to 3D print the case (I overstated the necessary build area). Added some rough tentative pricing for the 3D-printed version. Added IC Form for 3D-printed version.
October 12, 2020 - Added sound test of the 3D-printed version.
January 25, 2021 - Some minor edits, added top pictures of the 3D printed version
February 5, 2021 - Updated the IC in general, removed a lot of out-of-date info. Changed license to CERN OHL-W.
March 27, 2021 - Removed prices
April 11, 2021 - Added FCC disclaimer
March 19, 2022 - Updated everything
May 1, 2022 - Changed some of the images on the original post
Sep 22, 2022 - Removed some outdated info about the metal version from prior revisions (and some stuff I accidentally copy-pasted from the 3D printed section)
Dec 28, 2022 - Added links to Technofrikus' , and RNDKBD's in-stock 3D-printed version
April 26, 2023 - Fixed broken links, noted hotswap PCBs being prototyped, renamed metal version to CNC version, removed outdated note about CNC version unlikely to be open-sourced
June 22, 2023 - noted that RNDKBD is doing a GB in the title
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: pears on Wed, 20 May 2020, 14:09:17
big
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: hali on Wed, 20 May 2020, 14:15:42
a brass weight sounds a little overkill for this absolute unit
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: norb on Wed, 20 May 2020, 14:17:56
will need some massive novelty packs when you wanna put a single keyset on it  :eek:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: IOVERCALLHISTIOCYTES on Wed, 20 May 2020, 14:51:54
I don't usually 1800 but I've wanted a multiple f-row board for a long time.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: Butterbeer on Wed, 20 May 2020, 15:12:50
This is really just a giant Artisan display board :-)


Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 20 May 2020, 15:14:31
The case has a seam - I can't get the seam to display in the renders for some reason (will try to resolve and update the renders)

The layout and electrical schematic are derived from the Austin. The PCB and case are entirely new.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: Slash Emperor on Wed, 20 May 2020, 15:37:37
Welp, I gotta get the Boston and represent. Plus, this would be great for Skiidata and the relegendable keycaps.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: Capsy on Wed, 20 May 2020, 15:54:12
Looks decent. Love the experiment with the layout. Couple of things:

1] The weight will most likely make the back of the keyboard insanely heavy and awkward when picking it up or moving around. I'd suggest a smaller weight or a centered weight to drop in at the back if you still want to keep it as heavy as this design.

2] I'd bring the LED lights closer to each other.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 20 May 2020, 16:13:00
Thanks for the feedback Capsy - right now the case weighs about 3kg. I might just make the "weight" piece out of aluminum which would shave a kg off and lower the price a bit (brass is $$$). The piece also serves to set the angle and to cover the bottom of the controller daughterboard, so the location can't really change.

I'll consider moving the LEDs closer  together - right now they are aligned with the three keys above it.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 20 May 2020, 16:51:20
Renders updated to better show the seam in the case (I had to edit the Fusion joint and add a 0.3mm gap to get it to show up in the renders)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: Evilocity on Thu, 21 May 2020, 10:14:16
That's a lot of artisan holders!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: dani_ on Thu, 21 May 2020, 11:46:28
These massive layouts usually do nothing for me but I have to say I really dig this one. Have you considered a 2u vertical key in the function row? Similar to the tall Escape and Delete in the old school Thinkpads?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: Pylon on Thu, 21 May 2020, 11:50:49
Have you considered a 2u vertical key in the function row? Similar to the tall Escape and Delete in the old school Thinkpads?

I thought about doing a 2u vertical Esc key before I put the encoder in (the lone 1u Esc key looked a bit awkward), but no one makes a 2u vertical Esc key (I suppose I could get one dye subbed and that's it), or 2u vertical keys in general that aren't blanks or numpad keys (though Cherry did make a relegendable one that's shown up  in a couple of point-of-sale boards)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 29 May 2020, 18:46:12
Hey all, some updates:


Also thank you all for responding to the Interest Check form. So far it looks like:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: Aiwanei on Sat, 30 May 2020, 11:30:24
As a local to the Boston Area, I'm in like flynn
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120%
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 19 June 2020, 18:36:44
Sorry for the lack of updates. Not too many:

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: MousePounder on Fri, 19 June 2020, 19:59:56
oh man, I hope this works out with the purple and everything. I have been searching for a while for a layout with more buttons not less buttons

I answered the IC so I wish you luck in getting this GB sorted. I am going to set aside 1k in the hopes this project comes together and I can buy this and GMK Houhai 后海 !

GMK Houhai 后海 on this keyboard will look sick https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=107034.0;all (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=107034.0;all)

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: MousePounder on Fri, 19 June 2020, 20:23:16
pcb screw in stabilizers? I suppose my noobness is showing but I cant tell just from looking at the renders.

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 19 June 2020, 20:43:18
Thanks for answering the IC! Yes it does use screw-in PCB stabs.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: MousePounder on Fri, 19 June 2020, 22:29:34
This is SUPER basic but i set up one of those code things for people to put in there signatures.

I wanted a link for this project to put next to the keycaps I am going to get.


Code: [Select]
[/url][url=https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=106501.0][img width=168 height=120]https://i.imgur.com/fkFBETF.png?1[/img][/url]
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: hottrout on Sat, 20 June 2020, 03:10:53
Nice, ISO is required for me.  Don't rush into it, give it time and refine your design.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: UggNot on Sat, 20 June 2020, 10:50:03
Really looking forward to this one. Pretty much the only staggered board I’m looking forward to honestly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 20 June 2020, 17:21:12
This is SUPER basic but i set up one of those code things for people to put in there signatures.

I wanted a link for this project to put next to the keycaps I am going to get.


Code: [Select]
[/url][url=https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=106501.0][img width=168 height=120]https://i.imgur.com/fkFBETF.png?1[/img][/url]

Thanks so much! My graphics design skills are nonexistent so definitely appreciated. I'll put it up on the main post.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: MousePounder on Sat, 20 June 2020, 18:02:49
Sweet. I am glad I could help in some tiny way.

I am super stoked about this project.  :thumb:  ;D

 
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: funkmon on Sun, 21 June 2020, 00:59:10
Oh this is good. I like the real life pictures. Looks awesome! I'm interested. I need to learn to solder one of these days.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: jawoo on Mon, 22 June 2020, 12:32:45
Would you make a version 2.0 with no numpad for your next project?  I would be all over it. 
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: VXQN on Tue, 23 June 2020, 04:55:35
Not my usual style but wow, this looks incredible!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: jawoo on Fri, 26 June 2020, 04:49:34
Would you have color on them in R1?  color is a must for me, I am in.  Otherwise, I go for R2.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 26 June 2020, 15:03:31
Would you make a version 2.0 with no numpad for your next project?  I would be all over it. 

Probably not, as I'm a numpad user. If I get more involved with designing keyboards I could look into doing say, a 65% with additional keys on top, but for personal use I need a numpad.

Would you have color on them in R1?  color is a must for me, I am in.  Otherwise, I go for R2.


I'm still trying to get R1 sorted out, and it's a maybe on color. The original plan was to have SuNPe machine and anodize them in China, but I've been getting reports that their anodization work hasn't been great in the past. I also looked into just offering a raw as-machined aluminum case without any finishing, but raw aluminum is pretty soft and prone to scratches, and my prototype has gotten pretty scratched up, so I'm not comfortable offering that as it won't hold up. So I'm going to have to find a good anodizer now, probably within the US. From what I've read, clear anodization is generally less prone to QC issues than having colors (since it doesn't require dying) so that's most likely the only finish I'll offer on R1. The other option would be to find a supplier to powder-coat or Cerakote the case for colors.

I'm also trying to work out the vendor situation . Pretty much all vendors I've reached out to except one have either not responded,  or had their hands full with other keyboard GBs, and the one that's willing to run it is on the West Coast, and I'm still trying to sort out how QC would work (as I may also have to inspect all arriving parts, which may mean having to do a Boston->West Coast shipment of the parts, which would probably add $30-$40 per keyboard to the cost).
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: vhwatgoes on Tue, 07 July 2020, 10:14:04
There aren't enough Full-Size kits out there, and even the Austin was very limited, but this one is pretty special. I'll be eagerly watching this project!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: megaforce on Thu, 09 July 2020, 00:43:26
i love tatte bakery and cafe baby
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Thu, 09 July 2020, 01:41:27
Sorry for the lack of updates. Still working on the vendor situation.

After some thought I'm also adding an RGBLED indicator light next to the escape key to indicate QMK layer status (so people who assign multiple functions to the P-keys can be aware of what function the P-keys are set to). As a result I'm building up another prototype in the few next week and implementing those features in QMK.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: hottrout on Thu, 09 July 2020, 02:48:47
Keep refining, I like the concept.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Starius on Sat, 11 July 2020, 22:45:31
Just found this project.  Totally on board!  :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: esc on Sun, 12 July 2020, 08:39:57
Really like the layout! More keys > less keys, for me at least.

The aesthetics don't really speak to me.  If this were my design, I would rework the 'foot' to be a wedge, with bottom plane parallel to the desk.  I'd add a big chamfer to the front too, like the Cherry G80-3000.  I would either eliminate the seam on the sides or embrace it and offer independent anodization of the top and bottom pieces.  Personally I'd go for a light grey top with a cream bottom, or perhaps dark grey top and black bottom.  Finally, I'd explore a design with the numpad on the left.  These are all just my own preferences, of course, so probably worth less than the electrons which brought these characters to your eyes.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Sun, 12 July 2020, 20:00:04
I guess responding to that:

I intentionally didn't go for a typical wedge shape on either the bottom piece or the case overall because wedges are relatively expensive to machine. To machine a wedge well, you either need to do machine it on a 5-axis CNC, or a 3-axis with custom angled fixturing, which for a keyboard of this size is not cheap (and would have resulted in significantly more expensive prototypes). If you have holes going in at only one angle you could do 3D-profiling on a 3-axis (which takes a lots of machine time if you want an okay finish), but as soon as you have holes or pockets coming in at 2 different angles (e.g. a pocket for your bumpons parallel to the desk and a set of holes parallel to the plate to attach the plate) you need to do either the 5-axis or the custom fixturing. Both cost quite a bit more than typical 3-axis CNC machining.

if there's interest in a wedge-shaped case I could design one (possibly without a seam), with the caveat that it would cost more.

The more I think about the seam is potentially problematic alignment wise, but it does allow for stronger and thinner bezels than if I had done a one-piece seamless and then do the bottom piece as a flat plate, as it keeps the wall height/thickness ratios on the bezels lower, which results in stronger walls.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: cirrus82 on Sun, 12 July 2020, 20:26:30
This looks fantastic. Very interested.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: stoffelduss on Mon, 13 July 2020, 04:02:34
Hey! I just filled out the form but there's another form of feedback I want to give: I don't like how the bottom row looks with all 1.25u keys on one side and all 1u keys on the other. Instead of 125/125/125/625/100/100/100 I'd prefer something like 125/100/125/625/100/100/125.
Just having that one slightly bigger key in the mods next to the arrow keys would be a big improvement, imo :)

I ordered a bunch of kits in the last dev/tty run on drop so I'll have enough sensibly labelled keys for the top area of the board  ;D
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 18 July 2020, 04:04:34
Hey all,

I'm considering spending a week or two significantly redesigning the keyboard, after thoughts on the last prototype:

1.) The prototype has the controller on a socketed daughterboard separate from the keyboard PCB. The plan for the GB was to deliver the keyboard PCB unpopulated and the controller PCB (with all the SMD parts) populated. The advantages of this are:
Unfortunately, it has downsides:

SMD PCB assembly services are also cheaper than I expected. It might make a lot more sense to have everything onto a single board, like most other custom keyboards, and have SMD diodes that are pre-soldered. It would probably not add that much to the cost, and make soldering the PCB easier for beginners and less tedious even for more experienced users. This would also make the PCB more similar  to other custom keyboards out there, which have one-piece PCBs where the user is only expected to solder switches and maybe some LEDs.

2.) Having the seam down the middle of the case results in a stronger and slightly narrower case comparing to one where the seam is hidden below the keyboard, and allows for a much smaller gap between the two pieces, but it adds a couple issues:

I'm debating spending some time designing a seamless case. The aesthetics would be similar to the current prototype (basic rectangle with rounded corner, and 45° chamfers) minus the seam down the middle.

Ultimately this keyboard is unlikely to cost less than $400 during GB due to its size and likely small run on R1, and I'm not sure how acceptable the above caveats of the current design are on a keyboard of that price. Hence it will probably have to go through another redesign.

Also I did some work on a 3D-printed/laser-cut sandwich case for the same PCB and can probably hit <$180 total cost if I make the middle layer out of several smaller 3D-printed pieces. I'm going to do some more work on that design, but if it goes well I'll post more details of that and maybe a render.

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: MousePounder on Sat, 18 July 2020, 09:41:47

Response for point #1

I would be fine with a bit extra cost upfront to make the board easier to assemble.

Response for point #2

I do think seamless would look better in the end if you don't need to worry about color matching the top and bottom parts.

On a personal note, I am for sure the type that would find it bothersome to feel the seem.

I was already on board for this project at 600 so no worries about the pricing from me.

I am fine with waiting if it makes the end product closer to perfect.

Thanks for the update. :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: nikron on Sat, 18 July 2020, 10:38:23
I think you should absolutely make the price higher for an easier to solder experience. Putting on that controller sounds awful to me. Diodes seems fairly tedious, but doable I guess...

I think you should consider the seamless design if you aren't willing to raise the tolerances. But generally it sounds like you should be shooting for a higher price in order to make a better board. Given that there's not much competition for a 120%, what's the difference between $400 and $600?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: asmashedpumpkin on Sat, 18 July 2020, 13:35:10
I agree with Mousepounder and Nikron. 
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Mon, 20 July 2020, 17:55:48
Hey! I just filled out the form but there's another form of feedback I want to give: I don't like how the bottom row looks with all 1.25u keys on one side and all 1u keys on the other. Instead of 125/125/125/625/100/100/100 I'd prefer something like 125/100/125/625/100/100/125.
Just having that one slightly bigger key in the mods next to the arrow keys would be a big improvement, imo :)

I ordered a bunch of kits in the last dev/tty run on drop so I'll have enough sensibly labelled keys for the top area of the board  ;D

Sorry for not responding to this for a while. I'm not sure how much alternative bottom row support I want to provide at this point, especially for less common bottom rows like the one you suggested, as it makes soldering/assembly and firmware trickier. I guess I could slot the PCB and just publish different plate files for different bottom row layouts if people really wanted alternate bottom row support, but it would be a fairly low priority right now. Sorry.

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 22 July 2020, 16:21:47
Thanks for the feedback MousePounder, Nikron, and Asmashedpumpkin. I've been messing around with a case redesign in Fusion, and this is what I have so far. Here's some quick dirty renders of what I've been working with:

[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=2]
[attachimg=3]
[attachimg=5]

It still has a seam, but I moved it lower and added an overhang, to reduce the temptation of running your fingernail across the seam. In addition, the bottom weight is now optional if you want to run the keyboard at a 0° angle if you so chose:
[attachimg=4]

I also moved the RGBLED layer indicator light to above the right arrow key, to take up the awkward gap in the keys here. I'll be slotting in a diffused plastic lightpipe in here.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: MousePounder on Wed, 22 July 2020, 16:37:45
Thanks for the update.

First, The black bottom and silvertop in the renders looks awesome and I would be fine if that was the only option.

Or I can always do up the bottom in black myself if you end up not being able to do colors at first.

Second, I like the changes to the seam and the added overhang. In my mind that will make it far less of a standout contact point to get annoyed by.

Does this also hide where the two halves meet together? so if the seam is not flawless you wont really see it?

Lastly, The change to use up the space by the arrow keys sounds cool as long as the light is not distracting.

Overall very happy with these new renders and look forward to your future updates on the project.

Thanks for doing this and good luck to you.

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: switchnollie on Wed, 22 July 2020, 16:41:30
These types of boards I love seeing pictures of.

I would never figure out what to do with all those keys tho :p
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: -Jerry- on Wed, 22 July 2020, 17:23:16
I was just saying the other day that there aren’t enough full size customs about. I love the extra function buttons; one can never have enough options for MMOs, haha.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Thu, 23 July 2020, 00:41:45
Thanks for the update.

Second, I like the changes to the seam and the added overhang. In my mind that will make it far less of a standout contact point to get annoyed by.

Does this also hide where the two halves meet together? so if the seam is not flawless you wont really see it?


Thanks for the comments! Yes the point of contact between the two halves is hidden by a small lip on the top piece.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: nikron on Thu, 23 July 2020, 17:42:57
I like this a lot better.  I would do the 0 degree version.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: nikron on Fri, 24 July 2020, 11:38:53
One thing that's a little weird for about this board is the position of the arrow keys. I think the up arrow should line up with the vertical macro keys. Maybe move the arrow cluster down and to the right, below the numpad and the core keys?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 24 July 2020, 12:00:13
One thing that's a little weird for about this board is the position of the arrow keys. I think the up arrow should line up with the vertical macro keys. Maybe move the arrow cluster down and to the right, below the numpad and the core keys?

That would make the board wider, which I'm trying to avoid doing. I'm still trying to keep this narrower than a full-size while still having 2u numpad "0".

The layout's based off the Austin (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=106139.0) layout. It does leave an awkward gap next to the arrow keys, but it's still the narrowest form factor with a 2u "0" key that retains the arrow keys.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Lord_Rabel on Wed, 12 August 2020, 07:02:36
The one and only macro king xD ツ
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 15 August 2020, 11:45:51
Hey all, sorry for lack of updates:

(https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bluepylons/Boston/master/graphics/PCB-top-V0.4.png)
(https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bluepylons/Boston/master/graphics/PCB-bottom-V0.4.png)


(https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bluepylons/Boston/master/graphics/bostonKLE.png)

[attachimg=1]

[attachimg=2]
[attachimg=3]


[attachimg=4]


Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Lord_Rabel on Sun, 16 August 2020, 02:24:07
Can't wait for the final version!!
However as someone who makes PCBs kinda often, I want to give you the tipp, that your PCB runs kinda look strange. It probably works no problem, but you probably won't see the PCB anyway so it is just perfectionism from my side xD :D
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: IOVERCALLHISTIOCYTES on Sun, 16 August 2020, 13:39:30
Pylon, if you had some option during GB that was 'if I can't win a metal one, maybe I can win a plastic version' I probably wouldn't be the only one.

Since the big guy's named after a city call the LC version Worcester?

Great work man
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, an open-source Austin-derived compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Sun, 16 August 2020, 14:02:50
Hmm, Worcester is not a bad idea. Thanks for the suggestion!

There's a pretty good chance I'll run the 3D-printed/FR4 version first, as I can iterate and finalize the design a lot faster since I have access to a 3D printer right now for prototyping, and it's more straightforward since I don't have to get anything anodized. The metal version is about 2-3 weeks to get a prototype produced, and I still need to get the surface finishes figured out(how fine/coarse of a bead-blast finish I want, working with an anodization supplier, maybe trying out anodizing over as-machined aluminum with tool marks visible would look like, etc.)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: hiddensong on Mon, 17 August 2020, 14:34:46
Finally!! I, for one am getting a bit worn out by all the 60% clones. Very few offer anything different. While this isn’t original by a long shot, it is one that sticks out amongst today’s offerings. I love me a battleship and am down for one of the versions. Maybe grab the file and get an acrylic one made? Good luck and I sincerely wish you the best.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 19 August 2020, 20:49:55
Finally!! I, for one am getting a bit worn out by all the 60% clones. Very few offer anything different. While this isn’t original by a long shot, it is one that sticks out amongst today’s offerings. I love me a battleship and am down for one of the versions. Maybe grab the file and get an acrylic one made? Good luck and I sincerely wish you the best.

The PCB files are on the Github (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston)! Though the main design there hasn't been verified yet, so I would recommend holding off at least a couple of weeks. I also need to seriously reorganize the directories...

Got parts from JLCPCB today for the 3D-printed/FR4 version (the redesigned aluminum version uses the same PCB). Still waiting on some switches to arrive from Novelkeys, and I still need to print out a couple of parts (I just bought an Ender 3 Pro 3D printer and am setting it up), but did a super quick test fit with what I have. I'll be soldering the PCB later this week and getting QMK set up (the matrix has changed from the earlier version).
[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=2]
[attachimg=3]
[attachimg=4]

The raw HASL - lead free finish on the plate has a lot of blemishes, so I'm probably going to have solder mask over that, and it wouldn't be that shiny on future boards.

IOVERCALLHISTIOCYTES - my one hesitancy with naming the 3D-printed/FR4 version Worcester: I spent a fair amount of time putting a map of Boston graphic on the bottom cover, though I guess I could switch it out for a map of Worcester.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: IOVERCALLHISTIOCYTES on Wed, 19 August 2020, 21:55:55
Under no circumstances should you get rid of that map

Pawtucket? (It’s a Boston ‘minor league’)?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 19 August 2020, 23:09:47
I guess maybe Cambridge or Somerville (both of which are on that map), or just Boston - Entry Edition or something.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: hvontres on Wed, 19 August 2020, 23:44:15
Thanks for the updates. Definitely interested in the Entry edition.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: The.Ryan.Gamer on Sun, 23 August 2020, 05:24:01
Interesting. I would love to see a build vids before the GB.

Any ideas about pricing?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: psxndc on Sun, 23 August 2020, 18:41:36
Missed opportunity: have it be ortho and support only the "MIT" layout.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Sun, 23 August 2020, 22:13:53
Interesting. I would love to see a build vids before the GB.

Any ideas about pricing?

I don't have quotes on PCB assembly yet (affects both, but will be the bulk of the cost on the 3D-printed/FR4 version), as I'm still verifying the redesigned PCB, and don't have finish/anodizing quotes on the redesigned aluminum version (which isn't prototyped yet). I also haven't decided the GB size yet (though this is my first GB and I will be self-fulfillingl, so expect <50 on first round)

For very rough estimates, expect <$80 for a barebones PCB/FR4/hardware kit (where end-user 3D prints the 3D-printed parts themselves - I will release the STL files), <$150 for a complete 3D-printed/FR4-version kit, and $550 or less on the aluminum version (might be way less, but depends on yields).



Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: hvontres on Thu, 27 August 2020, 04:14:09
I think I have figured out a fun colorway for this:
[attach=1]
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 02 September 2020, 23:12:58
Hey all - not too many updates:


[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=2]
[attachimg=3]
[attachimg=4]
[attachimg=5]
[attachimg=6]
[attachimg=7]


Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (prototype pics!)
Post by: asmashedpumpkin on Wed, 02 September 2020, 23:31:00
I will be so disappointed if I can’t get in on this GB.  I’m all in on this to be me my daily driver for work.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: hvontres on Thu, 03 September 2020, 01:13:43
Thanks for the update. Definitely looking forward to the FR4 GB :)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: hvontres on Thu, 03 September 2020, 11:51:56
I haven't had a chance to look at the latest kicad files yet, but I was thinking it might be nice to have a spare I2c and/or SPI port on the board do be able to drive some OLED or LCD displays. I was thinking it might be kind of fun to come up with a custom case that has some displays just above the PF keys to show what they are mapped to, kind of like the Cherry/Reuters 9009. But that would definitely be a very optional feature and would in no way keep me from getting one of these.

Thank you for all the work and for supporting us full-is size types :)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 04 September 2020, 11:42:07
I haven't had a chance to look at the latest kicad files yet, but I was thinking it might be nice to have a spare I2c and/or SPI port on the board do be able to drive some OLED or LCD displays. I was thinking it might be kind of fun to come up with a custom case that has some displays just above the PF keys to show what they are mapped to, kind of like the Cherry/Reuters 9009. But that would definitely be a very optional feature and would in no way keep me from getting one of these.

Thank you for all the work and for supporting us full-is size types :)

Glad you're interested  :) I do agree the battleship and full size (not 1800) space is kind of underserved right now in terms of custom keebs.

Unfortunately I'm using every single pin right now on the 48-pin STM32F072 chip I'm using. Though 64-pin and 100-pin versions of the same chip do exist, but would require a significant redesign of the PCB. That's a cool idea for the future though.

[attachimg=1]



Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 04 September 2020, 11:46:35
Though I do suppose an i2C/SPI display could eliminate the need for the lock LEDs and possibly the RGBLED status indicator light, so that could free up 4 pins (though the pins they are currently assigned to do not support SPI or I2C).
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: hvontres on Fri, 04 September 2020, 22:46:20
Though I do suppose an i2C/SPI display could eliminate the need for the lock LEDs and possibly the RGBLED status indicator light, so that could free up 4 pins (though the pins they are currently assigned to do not support SPI or I2C).

However, the NumLock and CapsLock will work as a UART :) And since the resistors are through hole, there are already good places to pick them off for messing about. I don't know a lot about QMK yet, but it seems like having a second controller for the display might be a possibilty. And I stumbled across these neat 2.6" three color (white-red-black) e-ink displays that might look really good in the back.

Thanks for all your hard work on this.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: hvontres on Sat, 05 September 2020, 04:15:09
So I played around a little bit tonight, and here is a possible layout using a few of these : https://www.buydisplay.com/serial-spi-1-5-inch-color-oled-display-128x128-graphic-module-ssd1351 (https://www.buydisplay.com/serial-spi-1-5-inch-color-oled-display-128x128-graphic-module-ssd1351)

It looks like it might work, but I think there is room for improvement:
[attach=1]
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: treeleaf64 on Sat, 05 September 2020, 13:42:15
This is cool, is there any way to get rid of the visible screws on the top piece?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: treeleaf64 on Sat, 05 September 2020, 13:43:41
Never mind, I thought the 3d printed version was top mount but it is actually sandwich ~ ~ : )
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 05 September 2020, 15:34:44
Never mind, I thought the 3d printed version was top mount but it is actually sandwich ~ ~ : )

It's technically a top mount, though not exactly so - the plate is screwed into the top side of the case. It's just the screws are flipped (screws come in from the top and grab onto threaded holes in the plate to hold the plate to the top of the case, rather than screws coming in from the bottom). This was a necessary compromise from how I'm 3D printing the case. It's not a sandwich case at all from how the plate is mounted.
[attachimg=1]

The aluminum version is a traditional top mount.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 05 September 2020, 15:36:15
So I played around a little bit tonight, and here is a possible layout using a few of these : https://www.buydisplay.com/serial-spi-1-5-inch-color-oled-display-128x128-graphic-module-ssd1351 (https://www.buydisplay.com/serial-spi-1-5-inch-color-oled-display-128x128-graphic-module-ssd1351)

It looks like it might work, but I think there is room for improvement:
(Attachment Link)

Oh nice. Yeah, feel free to use or modify the PCB design to add those displays if you so desire. It should also be fairly easy to break out those microcontroller pins from the status LED pads.

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 05 September 2020, 20:20:35
Added an  IC Form  (https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeIJ2jjQXNM53C7ovwoUKfZ9U1PVOrajU6r16sreuFScfQhMQ/viewform?usp=sf_link) for the 3D-printed version.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: long_qt_pie on Sat, 05 September 2020, 21:32:07
In for Fr4/3d

Any possibility for 7u bottom row or 2x [1.5]u right of spacebar?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sun, 06 September 2020, 22:16:02
In for Fr4/3d

Any possibility for 7u bottom row or 2x [1.5]u right of spacebar?

I'm doing one more PCB spin before GB, so let met see if I can add it into the PCB and plate. Austin does it so it shouldn't be terribly difficult (1.5u-1.5u-7u-1.5u-1.5u is an option on Austin) since the lower 5 rows of this keyboard is basically that of the Austin.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Poetart on Tue, 15 September 2020, 11:55:05
Is there another way to keep up to date with this other than the forum post?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Tue, 15 September 2020, 14:05:17
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: hvontres on Fri, 18 September 2020, 14:08:59
Just FYI, I think I might have found a decent Keycap set for this board:
(https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/H486e6d8e88a446ce8f981e2dc7d319695.jpg)

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4001162310002.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.0.0.72f8613584HAGL&algo_pvid=ac0d96a4-c197-43b1-a80b-0091d910e5d8&algo_expid=ac0d96a4-c197-43b1-a80b-0091d910e5d8-0&btsid=0bb0623e16004142608567827e74b3&ws_ab_test=searchweb0_0,searchweb201602_,searchweb201603_
 (https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4001162310002.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.0.0.72f8613584HAGL&algo_pvid=ac0d96a4-c197-43b1-a80b-0091d910e5d8&algo_expid=ac0d96a4-c197-43b1-a80b-0091d910e5d8-0&btsid=0bb0623e16004142608567827e74b3&ws_ab_test=searchweb0_0,searchweb201602_,searchweb201603_)
215 keys, and most importantly, a complete second set of F-keys
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Sslix on Fri, 18 September 2020, 20:35:08
I love this.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: ChonkNogga on Mon, 21 September 2020, 05:56:03
This lookin sick. Any chance a brass weight will be available for the FR4 version or has design been finalised already?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Mon, 21 September 2020, 12:00:24
This lookin sick. Any chance a brass weight will be available for the FR4 version or has design been finalised already?

Thanks! Regarding the weight - the 3D printed design is reasonably finalized ATM, though being 3D printed it's not hard to make changes. For the brass weight - I suppose you could replace the 1.6mm FR4 panel on the bottom (the one with a map on it) with a laser-cut brass panel, possibly a thicker one (you would need longer M3 screws). I'm not sure if I'll offer it, as a brass weight of that size would probably add at least $50 to the price, but I'll have DXFs of the bottom panel published, if you want to go to Sendcutsend or wherever and have a weight laser-cut.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Poetart on Wed, 23 September 2020, 16:36:17
    Do people want a Discord server? I could also start posting daily updates to this thread or something.

    Right now I'm:
    • Adding 1.5u and split-space to the PCB. This also necessitates some changes to the plate.
    • Trying to work out some minor print quality issues on my 3D printer so that I can reliably print good quality cases. I also reached out to my friend who has a Prusa Mk3 3D printer.


    Other stuff on the to-do list:
    • Need to implement some features in QMK, set up QMK configurator, and redo the current QMK matrix/keymap files so they're done properly (the current files work but don't follow proper convention)
    • Write up assembly instructions

    Prototypes for the aluminum version are still a couple of weeks out.


I would love to have a discord setup for this. I want to make sure I don't miss out on this and I don't check the forums too often.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: hvontres on Wed, 23 September 2020, 16:55:18
    Do people want a Discord server? I could also start posting daily updates to this thread or something.

    Right now I'm:
    • Adding 1.5u and split-space to the PCB. This also necessitates some changes to the plate.
    • Trying to work out some minor print quality issues on my 3D printer so that I can reliably print good quality cases. I also reached out to my friend who has a Prusa Mk3 3D printer.


    Other stuff on the to-do list:
    • Need to implement some features in QMK, set up QMK configurator, and redo the current QMK matrix/keymap files so they're done properly (the current files work but don't follow proper convention)
    • Write up assembly instructions

    Prototypes for the aluminum version are still a couple of weeks out.


I would love to have a discord setup for this. I want to make sure I don't miss out on this and I don't check the forums too often.

I set up e-mail notifications for this thread for that reason.

[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: mr.squishy on Thu, 24 September 2020, 02:36:01
Love this. In for the 3d printed version. Let me know if you want someone to test the files on a different ender 3.

I think you could still call the fr4/3dp version the Boston, just call it the Boston South End. I like Brookline too.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 26 September 2020, 10:30:44
Hey all, some updates:

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: hiddensong on Mon, 28 September 2020, 03:42:45
Dood....that CNC Boston area map as the case bottom??? If that is an option? Then I'm all in. However itsan "all or none" for this round for me. Will probably have to wait until this has been refined a bit and the map is offered.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Realdrian on Tue, 29 September 2020, 18:58:10
Created an account just to say.

I love this design and am super IN for a aluminum kit whatever the cost
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: ChonkNogga on Wed, 30 September 2020, 07:31:40
This hobby has built up so much patience that honestly wouldn't mind waiting for the microcontrollers. Might even give you extra time to refine the keeb.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 30 September 2020, 19:16:23
Thanks for the support everyone!

Regarding adding a map onto the aluminum version - this has been requested by several people, but I'm kind of hesitant to do it and currently don't have plans to. For aluminum I'll have to either laser-engrave or print the map on somehow, which would add a fair amount of cost, and it most likely won't look as good as the FR4 bottom. Alternatively I could make a pocket on the bottom piece to embed an FR4 panel that has the artwork on it, but this would mean the bottom of the keyboard is now FR4 instead of aluminum, and the keyboard would feel a bit cheaper to hold. This is also complicated somewhat by the removable weight on the bottom on the aluminum one, which some people will have on (to set the keyboard to 6.4°) and some people won't have (if they want a 0° typing angle), and I'm not sure if I can get a design that looks good with both the weight on and the weight removed.

I added the map to the 3D-printed version since the bottom FR4 panel is manufactured as a PCB, so I get silkscreen, copper, and solder-mask layers for free, so I figured I might I might as well use those to add artwork. I was originally going to do a laser-cut stainless or brass bottom panel, but FR4 ended up being much cheaper, and being able to do the map for free ended up being a nice perk of doing FR4 too.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Realdrian on Thu, 08 October 2020, 10:07:46
Any news on the shortage of those microcontroller chips? I keep thinking about this board !
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sun, 11 October 2020, 02:17:52
Mouser is restocking CBU6's in November. Hopefully LCSC and other Chinese distributors also restock around then. Expect the GB to be around then.

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sun, 11 October 2020, 02:24:28
As usual, apologies for lack of updates - I unfortunately lost power and internet for three days, but am back now. I'm building up a proto of the latest PCB revision, and writing up assembly instructions. I'll make a sound test video soon tomorrow or Monday also.

GB will probably be in mid-November as that's when I'm expecting the chips to restock.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Really_Just_AE on Sun, 11 October 2020, 20:31:59
As usual, apologies for lack of updates - I unfortunately lost power and internet for three days, but am back now. I'm building up a proto of the latest PCB revision, and writing up assembly instructions. I'll make a sound test video soon tomorrow or Monday also.

GB will probably be in mid-November as that's when I'm expecting the chips to restock.

Given this timeline, what do you think the turnaround would be for the 3d printed versions? Something about this keyboard just screams to me to turn it into a Christmas gift for my dad    ;D
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Mon, 12 October 2020, 00:25:14
As promised, a sound test video of the 3D-printed/FR4 version. This board was built with Cherry MX Clears with spring ends lubed with Permatex dielectric grease, rails lubed with u/hbheroinbob's Loob-3g, and filmed with Deskey films. Stabilizers are C3Equalz. It has GMK Bingsu on it.

Using the onboard microphone on a Nikon D3300:

Using a Shure SM58 mic dangled above the keyboard:


Given this timeline, what do you think the turnaround would be for the 3d printed versions? Something about this keyboard just screams to me to turn it into a Christmas gift for my dad    ;D

This depends on the size of the GB and the PCB supplier I go with. It takes me a bit over a day to print everything necessary. Best-case scenario is if I cap it to 25 units, and do the PCBs through JLCPCB (~1 week turn, limited to 30 PCBs), everything goes smoothly (e.g. my 3D printer doesn't break), and hand-solder on the remaining components, the first units would ship out in a week and the GB is fulfilled in a month. This is extremely optimistic, and it's much more likely that it takes 2-3 months, if I go with a full-service PCB supplier (e.g. Elecrow or AllPCB) and do a larger GB. After having talked to other GB runners about their experiences, they recommended doing no more than 30 units for a very first group buy, so R1's probably going to get capped to ~25, with some extras/B-stock to be sold after. I would then try to run R2 as soon as possible afterwards.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: phxrbn on Tue, 13 October 2020, 13:05:47
 :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: dunskivuli on Wed, 14 October 2020, 13:51:49
I am so excited by this board, looks amazing. Been hunting for a full size custom for far too long.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: EikoMagami on Fri, 16 October 2020, 05:19:52
Had to make an account to say how much i want the aluminium version of this one. its glourious!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: lbassett21 on Sun, 18 October 2020, 23:23:02
I feel like I need this board! Absolutely love the look! If there was any way to possibly get the map of Boston as on the 3D printed version, even at a cost hike, it would be so worth it. GLWIC! Can't wait to (possibly) pick one up when the time comes!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: dunskivuli on Mon, 26 October 2020, 12:32:46
Edit: My bad! Haha

Unless I am reading it wrong, it looks like the chips are available again?

https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32f072c8.html#sample-buy (https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32f072c8.html#sample-buy)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: DekuSapling on Wed, 28 October 2020, 13:24:52
@Pylon

Unless I am reading it wrong, it looks like the chips are available again?

https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32f072c8.html#sample-buy (https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32f072c8.html#sample-buy)

Unfortunately, those are the 64kb variant of the chips, not the 128kb that Pylon is looking to use. The earliest that I could find for the 128kb chips being restocked was 24 Nov 2020 at Mouser. Link to Chips (https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/STMicroelectronics/STM32F072CBU6TR?qs=s5SkPsIz10%2Fmed9m47hqYw%3D%3D)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: dunskivuli on Wed, 28 October 2020, 13:31:07
@Pylon

Unless I am reading it wrong, it looks like the chips are available again?

https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32f072c8.html#sample-buy (https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32f072c8.html#sample-buy)

Unfortunately, those are the 64kb variant of the chips, not the 128kb that Pylon is looking to use. The earliest that I could find for the 128kb chips being restocked was 24 Nov 2020 at Mouser. Link to Chips (https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/STMicroelectronics/STM32F072CBU6TR?qs=s5SkPsIz10%2Fmed9m47hqYw%3D%3D)

Ah you're right, I was digging around a few vendor sites and missed that I ended up on the wrong version on their page. Darn
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 28 October 2020, 23:01:37
Hey all, since it's been over two weeks since my last update:

[attachimg=1]

Stuff I still need to do:

For the aluminum version - the prototype has been pushed back another month, but will have anodization, which should save me from having to get additional surface-finish prototypes in the future (the manufacturer is getting an in-house anodization setup soon, and asked me if I wanted anodization in exchange for a bit longer of a wait as they get that set up)

I started a new job last month and have had less time to devote to this project than before unfortunately, so apologies for the pace things are moving at right now.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Realdrian on Fri, 30 October 2020, 17:29:15
I'll take any update big or small!

really looking forward to an aluminum version.  :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Damogron on Fri, 30 October 2020, 18:37:44
this one one beefy boy
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: glowcloud on Fri, 30 October 2020, 20:57:39
I don't know how I've seemingly missed this. I saw the pic and it filled me with a sort of nostalgia, then saw your note about the ThinkPads and realized why. I've been getting mostly 65% boards, but I really love the look of this one! Great work!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: LeoneShamoth on Thu, 05 November 2020, 22:40:48
Got a buddy of mine interested, will keep up to date on this.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: hvontres on Sat, 07 November 2020, 14:16:42
Finished one of the beta units last night:

(https://i.imgur.com/HZKJ3BK.jpg)

(https://i.imgur.com/PbpsPC1.jpeg)

Keycaps are Susuwatari with some Row 1 SA keys to fill in the top row. I might put an extra tab key above the numpad later. The kit went together pretty smoothly. The only real issues I ran into were self inflicted. Note to self, if you are putting in under key leds, solder them in AFTER you put in the switches to make alignment easier.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: asmashedpumpkin on Sat, 07 November 2020, 18:55:22
Getting email notifications for this thread is a rollercoaster.  First, the feeling of excited anticipation at the possibility there could be an update on this board.  However more often than not, it’s just some person commenting about how they like the board or worse yet, an update on the 3D print version of it.  Nothing against that version, but I’m all about a premium aluminum version of this battleship. When I sit in front of this keeb I want to feel like I’m Homer Simpson in front of those power plant panels with all those buttons to press.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 07 November 2020, 22:09:44
Getting email notifications for this thread is a rollercoaster.  First, the feeling of excited anticipation at the possibility there could be an update on this board.  However more often than not, it’s just some person commenting about how they like the board or worse yet, an update on the 3D print version of it.  Nothing against that version, but I’m all about a premium aluminum version of this battleship. When I sit in front of this keeb I want to feel like I’m Homer Simpson in front of those power plant panels with all those buttons to press.


Sorry about that. Due to various delays (both with myself and with the manufacturer I'm working with) the aluminum version kept getting pushed back, and I've been focusing on the 3D-printed version for the last couple of months. Should I separate that one out into a separate IC thread?

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Realdrian on Sat, 07 November 2020, 22:56:37
I don't think that's necessary. I love all the updates equally.

patiently waiting
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: asmashedpumpkin on Sat, 07 November 2020, 23:23:57
Absolutely not Pylon!  You’re doing a great job, and in the end, I know whatever experience you gain or lessons learned working on the 3D print version you’ll be able to use it when you’re able to work the aluminum version again.  I just need to learn to be patient.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: bkrownd on Fri, 27 November 2020, 00:51:36
  yeah...but you see, this one goes to 11    :cool:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 28 November 2020, 02:22:14
Hey all - since it's been a month since my last update:

I received a batch of 25 PCBs without microcontrollers (as JLCPCB had no available stock for the past 2 months), and managed to get my hands on about 30 STM32F072CBU6 microcontrollers. I'm going to have to hand solder the microcontrollers to the boards, and have managed to do so successfully on one of the boards as a test. This batch of boards will form the basis for Round 1 for the 3D-printed version, which will unfortunately be on the small side (I'm expecting to be able to offer 15-20 spots, depending on how many working PCBs I get out of this batch). GB will be done old school, through Google Forms and Paypal. Spots will be allocated via a mix of FCFS and raffle. Based on survey results, I'll be offering white, black, dark blue, and purple for the cases. I'll have more details for the GB (including dates), as well as pictures of the colors in a couple of days as I work things out.

I apologize for the small size of R1 - between issues with microcontroller availability and this being my first GB, I don't want to go larger for a first round.  If it goes well I'll try to do a larger R2 as soon as possible afterwards. The PCB design is also open-source, and the 3D-printed case files are also available online on the Github repo for this project (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston), and you are free to use those files to build one yourself.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 04 December 2020, 08:50:52
Sorry - the update for the GB dates and other details is delayed, as I  was in close contact with a coworker who tested positive for COVID, and have to isolate from others I live with for the next 2 weeks (and can't access my workbench except very late at night). I haven't been able to go through the PCBs and solder microcontrollers to them as a result, as the number of spots I can offer depends on how many working PCBs I have on hand.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: keyboardkrill on Sat, 05 December 2020, 03:19:41
Sorry - the update for the GB dates and other details is delayed, as I  was in close contact with a coworker who tested positive for COVID, and have to isolate from others I live with for the next 2 weeks (and can't access my workbench except very late at night). I haven't been able to go through the PCBs and solder microcontrollers to them as a result, as the number of spots I can offer depends on how many working PCBs I have on hand.

Oh damn, hope you are doing well.
take care and be safe, bud. and try not to stress too much about gb. your health is more important than keebs. we can wait.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: AKmalamute on Thu, 10 December 2020, 18:59:56
I'm a big fan of heavy keyboards. Not sure I'm ready to get back into this hobby as I have a bunch of half finished projects STILL such as the GH-150 or whatever it was.

Aluminum is nice, but is there any chance of a "parts kit" run, with just the board and its controllers, then for download, the files for the aluminum?  I could get quotes from Lasergist and maybe a local shop for a case in steel. Would cost 3x the aluminum I've no doubt but it sure sounds good.

Plus I can talk myself into getting a parts kit much easier than a whole CNC milled hunk of aluminum.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: B3H3M0T on Fri, 01 January 2021, 22:23:23
I think there are 2 ways to make board more cheap
1. 3d print
2. Sandwiches Acrylic with laser cutting
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Exluna on Sat, 02 January 2021, 00:42:05
Whoa just found this... This thing is a behemoth!  :eek:

Watching!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Realdrian on Sun, 03 January 2021, 01:55:44
Happy New Year Pylon. Hope all is good  :)

still dreaming about this board
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sun, 03 January 2021, 17:54:14
Hi all,

Happy New Years! I thankfully did not seem to have caught COVID (I tested negative after 13 days of isolation), but unfortunately have been busy with work and some other stuff.

Updates so far:
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: ehagerty on Mon, 04 January 2021, 02:09:37
Really looking forward to picking up an early PCB - the design just really grabs me in a good way!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: mrvco on Wed, 06 January 2021, 11:07:45
Very cool!  Will the 3D printed and Aluminum cases be interchangeable?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: mewse on Wed, 06 January 2021, 16:12:53
I was going to ask about print volume required for the case but found the build instructions for the 3D printed version and it looks easily printable - the instructions seem really well written. Very excited about this project.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Thu, 07 January 2021, 08:30:27
Very cool!  Will the 3D printed and Aluminum cases be interchangeable?

They use the same PCB, but the plate and cases are different. So not really unfortunately.

Quote
I was going to ask about print volume required for the case


Right now, you need 200 long x 150 wide x 210mm tall mm . STLs are available on Github here (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/tree/master/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/3D-printed%20case%20-%20parts/STLs).

Appreciate all your interest!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: mattiemisfit on Mon, 11 January 2021, 17:58:42
created an account specifically to follow this project, this looks great!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: CyCo on Tue, 19 January 2021, 19:34:14
I made an account just for this. Cant wait for a 120%!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: lllchevy350lll on Sat, 23 January 2021, 08:53:37
any update on this limited run of b-stock?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Vardys on Mon, 25 January 2021, 17:59:13
New to the hobby and just made an account for this! Gorgeous board, looking forward to getting my hands on one!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Mon, 25 January 2021, 23:05:17
any update on this limited run of b-stock?

Unfortunately I'm running into a lot of issues with my 3D printer as of late, and am still trying to get that resolved. It's a combination of colder winter temperatures (my printer usually lives in my basement) causing print quality issues and a lot of failed prints, and a lot of headaches with the BL-Touch bed leveling sensor I installed in December (which is giving me a lot of bed crashes and resulting print failures). So unfortunately no dates yet unfortunately, as I'm still working on getting that resolved. Sorry for things moving slowly. I do still intend to run a GB with the full 3D printed case in the near future.

Since getting the 3D printing back up to par is taking a while, if anyone owns or has access to a 3D printer, are willing to print their own case, and wants to purchase a B-stock barebones kit (PCB, FR4 plate, FR4 panels, feet, screws and other hardware, and rotary encoder, but no knob) for $80 + shipping, please send me a PM. I have around ~20 keebs worth of PCBs, plates, FR4 panels, and hardware. STL files and a STEP assembly file are available on Github here (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/tree/master/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/3D-printed%20case%20-%20parts), with some instructions on printing in the manual here here (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/blob/master/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/3D-printed%20case%20-%20parts/Draft%20instructions%20(barebones%20kit).pdf). The microcontroller, USB-C port, and a couple of small parts on the PCB have been hand-soldered due to JLCPCB's limitations. Each PCB is fully tested. I also don't have any knobs on-hand at the moment, but it's fairly easily to find STL files of knobs online to 3D print, or you can buy a nice metal knob such as these guitar knobs (https://www.stewmac.com/parts-and-hardware/knobs/dome-knob.html) or  this knurled aluminum one (https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/kilo-international/OEDNI-75-2-7/5970341?s=N4IgTCBcDa5gbAWgCwEYAcBWRA5AIiALoC%2BQA).

The PCBs for the above batch are green as JLCPCB at the time only offered green PCBs for PCBs with components soldered on. The plate and all other FR4 pieces are matte black.
[attachimg=1]



I have working QMK firmware for it with all the features I intended implemented (layers, layer indicator LED, and encoder), but I'm still waiting on the pull request to the QMK repo to get approved (https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/pull/11273). QMK Configurator won't work until the pull request gets approved, so you'll have to compile firmware files manually through command line and editing keymap files at this time.

Future boards won't have green PCBs  - I got a quote from Elecrow for fully-assembled PCBs with white solder mask and it's quite a bit lower than expected, so I'm planning on running future boards through them.

For the metal version - I'm working things out with an American machine shop and a vendor to run that board. Will have some updates on that soon.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: lllchevy350lll on Tue, 26 January 2021, 12:50:55
any update on this limited run of b-stock?

Unfortunately I'm running into a lot of issues with my 3D printer as of late, and am still trying to get that resolved. It's a combination of colder winter temperatures (my printer usually lives in my basement) causing print quality issues and a lot of failed prints, and a lot of headaches with the BL-Touch bed leveling sensor I installed in December (which is giving me a lot of bed crashes and resulting print failures). So unfortunately no dates yet unfortunately, as I'm still working on getting that resolved. Sorry for things moving slowly. I do still intend to run a GB with the full 3D printed case in the near future.

Since getting the 3D printing back up to par is taking a while, if anyone owns or has access to a 3D printer, are willing to print their own case, and wants to purchase a B-stock barebones kit (PCB, FR4 plate, FR4 panels, feet, screws and other hardware, and rotary encoder, but no knob) for $80 + shipping, please send me a PM. I have around ~20 keebs worth of PCBs, plates, FR4 panels, and hardware. STL files and a STEP assembly file are available on Github here (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/tree/master/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/3D-printed%20case%20-%20parts), with some instructions on printing in the manual here here (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/blob/master/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/3D-printed%20case%20-%20parts/Draft%20instructions%20(barebones%20kit).pdf). The microcontroller, USB-C port, and a couple of small parts on the PCB have been hand-soldered due to JLCPCB's limitations. Each PCB is fully tested. I also don't have any knobs on-hand at the moment, but it's fairly easily to find STL files of knobs online to 3D print, or you can buy a nice metal knob such as these guitar knobs (https://www.stewmac.com/parts-and-hardware/knobs/dome-knob.html) or  this knurled aluminum one (https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/kilo-international/OEDNI-75-2-7/5970341?s=N4IgTCBcDa5gbAWgCwEYAcBWRA5AIiALoC%2BQA).

The PCBs for the above batch are green as JLCPCB at the time only offered green PCBs for PCBs with components soldered on. The plate and all other FR4 pieces are matte black.
(Attachment Link)



I have working QMK firmware for it with all the features I intended implemented (layers, layer indicator LED, and encoder), but I'm still waiting on the pull request to the QMK repo to get approved (https://github.com/qmk/qmk_firmware/pull/11273). QMK Configurator won't work until the pull request gets approved, so you'll have to compile firmware files manually through command line and editing keymap files at this time.

Future boards won't have green PCBs  - I got a quote from Elecrow for fully-assembled PCBs with white solder mask and it's quite a bit lower than expected, so I'm planning on running future boards through them.

For the metal version - I'm working things out with an American machine shop and a vendor to run that board. Will have some updates on that soon.

3d printed design is good though, if i outsourced the printing? and the fr4 panel included is the one pictured with the map on it?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Tue, 26 January 2021, 15:35:21
I could outsource the 3D printing but it will probably raise the cost somewhat. TBH if I were outsourcing I would redesign the case to be SLA 3D printed on a large format printer to get rid of the visible screwheads and the seam in the middle, but that would drive the price significantly (probably $200 minimum).

The FR4 panel included is the one with the map on it.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Crabby on Tue, 26 January 2021, 21:51:44
Will there be a way to get the PCB/plate only so we can print/build our own reduced height version of the case? The incline is far too steep for my typing style.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: eibbun on Tue, 26 January 2021, 22:03:51
oh the things i would do for this board in cyan :p
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: TeacherGeek on Wed, 27 January 2021, 02:00:11
I'm quite interested in this and would like to see a 3d printed version first and then slowly work on an alu version of it later.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Katacalysm on Mon, 01 February 2021, 12:20:04
Beautiful keyboard, certainly interested in this, probably more the 3D printed version as the shipping cost for the alu version might make it prohibitively expensive for me.

Also this is probably a dumb question (i'm new to custom keyboard stuff) but I assume single colour backlight support means that they couldn't be configured to act as the lock status LEDs?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: hvontres on Mon, 01 February 2021, 12:25:02
Correct. However, there are three dedicated status LED's and a single RGB LED next to the encoder that can be used for status indication. I have mine set up to show the current layer status (Blue, Red or Green) and have the lock lights on the regular leds.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Inner-Ear on Wed, 24 February 2021, 20:38:59
How do we get notified when the GB starts?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 24 February 2021, 22:31:29
How do we get notified when the GB starts?

For the 3D-printed version - I'll post in this thread with some notice. If you want have access to a 3D-printer and want a B-stock barebones kit (PCB, plate, bottom panels, hardware) for the 3D-printed (see post above (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=106501.msg3006394#msg3006394)) PM me as I still have quite a few of those.

It probably won't be at least for another couple of weeks, as unfortunately I've been very busy with work as of late and it probably won't let up for a couple more weeks. I did spend a couple hours tinkering with my Ender 3 3D printer, and unfortunately it does not home the Z-axis consistently anymore and has repeatedly either crashed into the bed or printed far too high above the bed, with no rhyme or reason to it. I need to reflash the firmware and/or possibly replace the bed leveling sensor on it (or just go back to manual bed leveling), but haven't gotten around to doing so. Sorry about that. Once the printer is back up and working reliably I can announce a GB date.

For the metal version - there's been some significant progress with the US shop and vendor I'm working with, and there will be an announcement (and proto pics) in the near future, but nothing I can share yet. 
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Dyto69 on Thu, 25 February 2021, 08:04:04
Wow i really like this Project, will definitely keep an eye out for this one.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: CitizenCypher on Thu, 25 February 2021, 15:15:43
Love the look of this board, and am eagerly anticipating have almost enough keys.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: bkrownd on Thu, 25 February 2021, 16:20:15
Love the look of this board, and am eagerly anticipating have almost enough keys.

The ultimate question is...how many dollars per key? 
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: CitizenCypher on Thu, 25 February 2021, 16:40:32
Love the look of this board, and am eagerly anticipating have almost enough keys.

The ultimate question is...how many dollars per key?

I mean, I'm already paying ~$1 per keycap, and probably $.50-$.75 a switch, so I've got keep my budget reasonable. For a full alu case, I'd be happy with ~$4 a socket.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: bkrownd on Thu, 25 February 2021, 17:27:54

I mean, I'm already paying ~$1 per keycap, and probably $.50-$.75 a switch, so I've got keep my budget reasonable. For a full alu case, I'd be happy with ~$4 a socket.

  $4 a socket is WAY beyond my budget.   :eek:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Realdrian on Thu, 25 February 2021, 21:06:23
How do we get notified when the GB starts?

For the 3D-printed version - I'll post in this thread with some notice. If you want have access to a 3D-printer and want a B-stock barebones kit (PCB, plate, bottom panels, hardware) for the 3D-printed (see post above (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=106501.msg3006394#msg3006394)) PM me as I still have quite a few of those.

It probably won't be at least for another couple of weeks, as unfortunately I've been very busy with work as of late and it probably won't let up for a couple more weeks. I did spend a couple hours tinkering with my Ender 3 3D printer, and unfortunately it does not home the Z-axis consistently anymore and has repeatedly either crashed into the bed or printed far too high above the bed, with no rhyme or reason to it. I need to reflash the firmware and/or possibly replace the bed leveling sensor on it (or just go back to manual bed leveling), but haven't gotten around to doing so. Sorry about that. Once the printer is back up and working reliably I can announce a GB date.

For the metal version - there's been some significant progress with the US shop and vendor I'm working with, and there will be an announcement (and proto pics) in the near future, but nothing I can share yet.


Awesome to hear about the metal version!! I cant wait
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: JucheCatgirlTS on Sat, 06 March 2021, 16:18:51
So I've got one of the B-stock PCB kits but unfortunately I no longer have access to a 3D printer capable of printing the case for this bad boy. Since ordering a one-off from Shapeways is crazy expensive, will there be any option for ordering just a case during the GB, either metal or printed? I'm eager to build it out and start using it but I'm rather stuck at the moment until I can find a printer or until the GB starts.

Regardless, I'm really impressed with the design and I can't wait to start using mine :-)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sun, 07 March 2021, 16:08:19
Yeah, that'll definitely be an option. Sorry to hear the loss of 3D printer access.

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: long_qt_pie on Thu, 11 March 2021, 22:28:15
Finally got to building mine, fun board to build!

(https://imgur.com/a/0DnRTRg)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Virex on Fri, 12 March 2021, 00:12:32
Finally got to building mine, fun board to build!

Show Image
(https://imgur.com/a/0DnRTRg)


Looking Good, watching this space for more updates! You have my support!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: hvontres on Fri, 12 March 2021, 00:26:33
Finally got to building mine, fun board to build!

Show Image
(https://imgur.com/a/0DnRTRg)

Nice, love the space cadet keycaps :)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: orb on Tue, 16 March 2021, 16:09:24
Ooooh I love this... More keys = more good. Will there be split l-shift support? If so, this is definitely something I'd want to pick up!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 17 March 2021, 19:05:43
Finally got to building mine, fun board to build!

Show Image
(https://imgur.com/a/0DnRTRg)


Nice! Looks awesome!

Will there be split l-shift support? If so, this is definitely something I'd want to pick up!

The current PCB and plate support the UK-style 1.25u left shift and extra > < key, if that's what you're referring to.

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: LeoneShamoth on Wed, 17 March 2021, 20:00:34
Is there any of the B-stock left? I would like to get a set if possible.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: NathanielGoodtimes on Wed, 17 March 2021, 20:29:37
When is round 2?!?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: JucheCatgirlTS on Thu, 18 March 2021, 14:52:29
Yeah, that'll definitely be an option. Sorry to hear the loss of 3D printer access.

Glad to hear it. Yeah my local library has a 3d printer but it's been out of commission recently waiting for some sort of repairs. I was able to get it printed elsewhere though so I'm going to build mine tomorrow - stay tuned! For me this design really has it all, 2u numpad '0', full 2x3 nav cluster, split spacebar and backspace, and all those programmable keys! I'm most excited for the split space though, I find it incredibly useful but it just doesn't seem very popular.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: JucheCatgirlTS on Sun, 21 March 2021, 02:54:58
Just finished mine a little while ago! Built with 62g Boba U4Ts everywhere except F13-F24 and the 3 keys above Print-ScrLck-Pause where I ran out; I used NK Blueberries there instead. I'll share some thoughts once I've been able to use it a bit more but so far I'm really enjoying it :-)

Thanks again Pylon!
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20210321/3b283d8eaf8c3dbb2a78b9df9d4db9c1.jpg)

Sent from my HD1907 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Starius on Mon, 29 March 2021, 09:55:33
I only just discovered this project. I’m definitely gonna follow and keep an eye out for the metal version!  :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Gaul on Wed, 07 April 2021, 09:11:32
I was missing a full size keyboard, and this one doesn't compromise, can't wait for the 3d printed one :D
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: LeoneShamoth on Thu, 08 April 2021, 21:27:55
Well, I got my kit and assembled it, check out the video here: https://youtu.be/a4v0BqD0Gjg (https://youtu.be/a4v0BqD0Gjg). Overall the keyboard is very nice and not too bad to put together, although I found balancing it hard. I do have to say that the front is a little tall, but that can be fixed with a wrist rest.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: VoodooBear on Fri, 09 April 2021, 14:23:08
Alu case still happening?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: warbosschoppa on Fri, 09 April 2021, 20:30:14
As a fellow Mass-hole and Bostonian I need this and made an account just to post this, when is round 2?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: derpturtle on Fri, 09 April 2021, 22:55:22
now this is what a keyboard looks like
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Volny on Wed, 14 April 2021, 07:18:19
Definitely interested in this. I'm a heavy macro user, and already implement many macros using F13-F24 keys. They don't actually exist on my board, but I get my Stream Decks and programs like Autohotkey to perform various virtual gymnastics and talk to each other by simulating and/or listening for those keys to trigger different things. I started doing this when I ran out of 'real' hotkeys to use  :D Having an extra row of F keys would be just great (whether to map to real F13-F24 keys to make my life easier, or to use in addition to them). I really like the efficient layout too.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: hvontres on Wed, 14 April 2021, 10:14:28
Definitely interested in this. I'm a heavy macro user, and already implement many macros using F13-F24 keys. They don't actually exist on my board, but I get my Stream Decks and programs like Autohotkey to perform various virtual gymnastics and talk to each other by simulating and/or listening for those keys to trigger different things. I started doing this when I ran out of 'real' hotkeys to use  :D Having an extra row of F keys would be just great (whether to map to real F13-F24 keys to make my life easier, or to use in addition to them). I really like the efficient layout too.

I set mine up to have there layers for the upper F-keys. I use the three extra keys above the lock keys to switch between them and the RGB led as the layer indicator. For now I have them as F13-24 , cntrl+F13-24 and alt+F13-24
So far I have only used a couple of them, but I figure I'll find more uses as time goes on.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: JucheCatgirlTS on Thu, 15 April 2021, 17:53:18
A few thoughts on the Boston:

Love having the split space on a larger board, although I exclusively use my left thumb for space and would prefer the larger spacekey on the left. I'd love to hear what other split-space users think. I'm guessing allowing for both orientations would create a swiss-cheese PCB.

The sound of the 3-D case board is soooo nice, kinda reminds me of vintage keyboards with those giant plastic enclosures. I put Boba U4ts in mine and it's one of the best-sounding boards I have IMO, it really makes these switches sound great.

Another user mentioned the front of the case seeming a bit tall. I was about to respectfully disagree, but I just compared to the...uh....4 other keyboards within arms' reach (!) and it is indeed a bit taller than any of those. This board definitely has an imposing presence on my desk, although in day-to-day use it doesn't feel particularly tall to me. But that's just, like, my opinion, man.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: spikedsynapse on Thu, 15 April 2021, 18:06:24
How does one go about obtaining one of these beautiful monstrosities?? :D
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Inner-Ear on Thu, 15 April 2021, 20:21:35
Here's mine:

(https://i.imgur.com/4Tu9arh.jpg)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: StreetMeat on Thu, 15 April 2021, 22:20:12
Oh man, I'm about to move back to Ohio, but I would love to pick this board up as a little (or huge) reminder of my time spent in Boston.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 21 April 2021, 23:25:24
Nice work JucheCatgirlTS, Inner-Ear, and LeoneShamoth! Also really appreciate the build video you did LeoneShamoth!

How does one go about obtaining one of these beautiful monstrosities?? :D

I've been selling B-stock PCBs, plates, and hardware kits - the people you see in this thread who are posting have 3D printed their own cases.  Unfortunately haven't done a formal GB for either the 3D-printed or the metal versions yet. I'm still working on both of them. I apologize for how long this is taking (it's approaching a year since I posted the IC).

I do owe all of you a longer update, which and I'll have something more detailed probably this weekend. I've been spending the past month trying to figure out FCC regulations around selling keyboard kits, and figuring out whether I need to run this keyboard through EMI/RFI compliance testing (which would entail significant cost and likely entail some changes to the project, including probably another redesign and some changes to the supported features and options). So far the regulations, FCC guidance, and past FCC rulings appear to be contradictory, and it's probably fine if I'm selling/running a GB for kits of the current design without testing if they require a substantial amount of assembly, but I'm still trying to figure out what I should do regarding this moving forward, as it might still be best if I get the board through FCC testing. These regulations also have broad implications upon the broader custom keyboard hobby. Again I'll do a more detailed post in a couple of days explaining these regulations and what I'm thinking about moving forward. 
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: lush_bunny on Thu, 22 April 2021, 05:58:00
Nice work JucheCatgirlTS, Inner-Ear, and LeoneShamoth! Also really appreciate the build video you did LeoneShamoth!

How does one go about obtaining one of these beautiful monstrosities?? :D

I've been selling B-stock PCBs, plates, and hardware kits - the people you see in this thread who are posting have 3D printed their own cases.  Unfortunately haven't done a formal GB for either the 3D-printed or the metal versions yet. I'm still working on both of them. I apologize for how long this is taking (it's approaching a year since I posted the IC).

I do owe all of you a longer update, which and I'll have something more detailed probably this weekend. I've been spending the past month trying to figure out FCC regulations around selling keyboard kits, and figuring out whether I need to run this keyboard through EMI/RFI compliance testing (which would entail significant cost and likely entail some changes to the project, including probably another redesign and some changes to the supported features and options). So far the regulations, FCC guidance, and past FCC rulings appear to be contradictory, and it's probably fine if I'm selling/running a GB for kits of the current design without testing if they require a substantial amount of assembly, but I'm still trying to figure out what I should do regarding this moving forward, as it might still be best if I get the board through FCC testing. These regulations also have broad implications upon the broader custom keyboard hobby. Again I'll do a more detailed post in a couple of days explaining these regulations and what I'm thinking about moving forward.

I always thought that GB has been run and done! My interest has been re-piqued. Good luck with the regulations there.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Volny on Thu, 22 April 2021, 07:09:17
Yeah, the more I look at this (and the more I realise the dearth of fullsize+ keyboards on the market) the more I think this is going to be my next keyboard!  :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: NathanielGoodtimes on Thu, 22 April 2021, 08:50:22
I am drooling!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: geauxflying on Wed, 28 April 2021, 21:12:00
If there is any more B stock or another round, message me and I’m in. Looks like this would be a great work keyboard for me.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: jkongers on Wed, 28 April 2021, 21:16:55
+1 for a B stock barebones kit if you can ship to Canada!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Volny on Wed, 28 April 2021, 23:33:29
Now that I'm increasingly interested in this, I've taken a closer look and have a few questions.

The KLE pic is inaccurate when it comes to the gap between the top 2 rows and bottom 5 rows. The KLE shows the gap as being 0.5u, while the prototype pics show it as being 0.75u (I measured in Photoshop). Given there's an extra top row to reach, could the gap be shortened to be more like the KLE? Or even shorter? (On the Corsair K100 I'm using at the moment, the gap seems to be ~0.2u)

Does the detailed Boston city map engraving add to the production cost? If so, can it be made optional? It looks pretty cool, and would be awesome for people who have an emotional attachment to that city, but that's bound to be a minority, and it's also visually busy. No matter what, this beautiful behemoth will cost an arm and a leg, so I'd rather pay for features I'll actually benefit from (or even just for an increased profit margin for you) than for an engraving that will just lie forgotten collecting grime on the underside.

The screws on the front - they're pretty ugly. And I can imagine thumbs occasionally bumping into them as they rest or slide across the keyboard. Could they at least be made flush with the case surface?

What color will the plate for the plastic version be? There's a lot of reflection coming off it in some of the prototype pics, suggesting it's metal or perhaps white. Any chance there'll be a dark/black option?

What does "single-color LED backlight support" mean exactly? Does it mean that every key can have an LED, but their brightness/on/off state can't be controlled independently? Or does it mean that there'll be some LEDs dotted around the PCB independent of the keys, providing a general glow? If it's the former, then will color be changeable in some way (as a single 121-key group, not per-key) or will the color be set in stone by the physical color of the installed LEDs?

Thanks

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: geauxflying on Thu, 29 April 2021, 12:35:07
It does seem that it would be just as easy to screw it together from the backside as from the top (thus hiding the screws). Or, countersinking the screw holes would look better. In any case, getting rid of the pan head screws would seem to be a plus.

I like that the case isn't anodized. It would be easy/inexpensive to get it coated locally and makes for a nice customization option for people.

My guess is that if you want to start selling kits, you could get cases, plates, and PCBs, foam, etc, put it on a website, people will buy it. I'd lean towards adding any and all options, QMK, VIA, USB, RGB, ABC, etc. - this looks like a board that people would want to use every day, not just add to their collection.

I agree with the previous comment that the Boston graphic likely doesn't add to many people's interest in this board as few people have any connection to Boston - 0.2% of Americans live there. It wouldn't stop me from buying it though. I would prefer a barebones kit, even to do my own anodizing seems like a fun customization option. Most cities have places that will anodize for people who don't want to DIY. You could also offer anodizing for a fee and probably make a very good margin on it (DIY anodizing isn't for everyone, most people don't have buckets of acid laying around, and you can get it done in batches much more economically, and make money on it...

Anyway, I want in the GB... I PM'd... will PM my contact info since I don't login here very often.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 30 April 2021, 11:06:54

The KLE pic is inaccurate when it comes to the gap between the top 2 rows and bottom 5 rows. The KLE shows the gap as being 0.5u, while the prototype pics show it as being 0.75u (I measured in Photoshop). Given there's an extra top row to reach, could the gap be shortened to be more like the KLE? Or even shorter? (On the Corsair K100 I'm using at the moment, the gap seems to be ~0.2u)



It's a 0.5u gap on the 3D-printed version and on the newer metal version. The metal version pictures are of an older prototype with a larger gap. The KLE is also meant purely for displaying compatible layouts and is not meant to be representative of the gaps between clusters, though it happens to be accurate for that as of now.

Quote
Does the detailed Boston city map engraving add to the production cost? If so, can it be made optional? It looks pretty cool, and would be awesome for people who have an emotional attachment to that city, but that's bound to be a minority, and it's also visually busy. No matter what, this beautiful behemoth will cost an arm and a leg, so I'd rather pay for features I'll actually benefit from (or even just for an increased profit margin for you) than for an engraving that will just lie forgotten collecting grime on the underside.

The map does not add any cost on the 3D-printed version as it's made as a PCB. Solder mask, copper, and silkscreen are free on PCBs. I don't intend on offering a bottom panel without the map on that version. The metal version will not have the map, as I'll have to either silkscreen print it, engrave it, or laser etch it, which adds cost and results in another item to QC.

Quote
The screws on the front - they're pretty ugly. And I can imagine thumbs occasionally bumping into them as they rest or slide across the keyboard. Could they at least be made flush with the case surface?


I've thought about switching to countersunk screws, but I have concerns over how well countersinks will 3D print in the current orientation I print it in. I've also thought about switching from top mount to bottom mount to try to move the screws to the bottom, which is a possibility. If I have to do a redesign to get this FCC certified I will probably implement this.

Quote
What color will the plate for the plastic version be? There's a lot of reflection coming off it in some of the prototype pics, suggesting it's metal or perhaps white. Any chance there'll be a dark/black option?


It is matte black solder mask as of now. The early prototypes were done with silver (bare HASL-Leadfree), but the finish was kind of poor so I switched to black solder mask.

Quote
What does "single-color LED backlight support" mean exactly? Does it mean that every key can have an LED, but their brightness/on/off state can't be controlled independently? Or does it mean that there'll be some LEDs dotted around the PCB independent of the keys, providing a general glow? If it's the former, then will color be changeable in some way (as a single 121-key group, not per-key) or will the color be set in stone by the physical color of the installed LEDs?

The entire backlight is controlled as an entire block. You cannot turn individual keys on/off. Color is determined by the LED you solder in.

I like that the case isn't anodized. It would be easy/inexpensive to get it coated locally and makes for a nice customization option for people.

I plan on offering the metal version anodized, though raw aluminum may be offered as an option. The prototypes aren't anodized since I didn't want to pay for anodization on the prototype (I also personally like  raw aluminum).

Also, I still owe an update on the FCC situation. It's taking me a while to write - apologies for the delays there.


Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: lllchevy350lll on Mon, 03 May 2021, 09:53:07
got my boston built last night. so much fun to build. what size knob do we need for this?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Muad_Keeb on Mon, 03 May 2021, 10:08:20
Oh my! I didn't realize there were plates available. I've got a large-format 3D printer and a dream, how does one get in on a beta?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: lllchevy350lll on Mon, 03 May 2021, 10:51:15
Oh my! I didn't realize there were plates available. I've got a large-format 3D printer and a dream, how does one get in on a beta?

ask pylon if he has any more barebones kits
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: pepo2181 on Tue, 04 May 2021, 07:08:28
Finally got the time to finish mine.
Put JTK Toxic to use...
sorry for the potato picture
(https://i.postimg.cc/8CrydF51/PXL-20210504-115933741-2.jpg)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Muad_Keeb on Tue, 04 May 2021, 07:52:59
So I've got one of the B-stock PCB kits but unfortunately I no longer have access to a 3D printer capable of printing the case for this bad boy. Since ordering a one-off from Shapeways is crazy expensive, will there be any option for ordering just a case during the GB, either metal or printed? I'm eager to build it out and start using it but I'm rather stuck at the moment until I can find a printer or until the GB starts.

Regardless, I'm really impressed with the design and I can't wait to start using mine :-)

Not sure if you got this done yet, but I'm happy to print and ship you one at cost.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: xavierlh on Tue, 04 May 2021, 09:36:35
will this ever run again?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: lush_bunny on Tue, 04 May 2021, 10:15:00
will this ever run again?

It hasn't even officially started yet.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: mr.squishy on Tue, 04 May 2021, 23:05:12
~snip~

Where did you get that encoder knob? It would go perfectly with mine.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: pepo2181 on Wed, 05 May 2021, 07:02:52
~snip~

Where did you get that encoder knob? It would go perfectly with mine.

It is a guitar knob from Xentric guitars, https://xentricguitars.com/products/guitar-accessories/ (https://xentricguitars.com/products/guitar-accessories/)
But that one in particular, I bought it from Xentric Guitars store at Amazon
https://www.amazon.com/Xentric-Guitars-Ignite-Fluorescent-Guitar/dp/B08D6YLYR6/ref=sr_1_11?dchild=1&qid=1620215922&sr=8-11&srs=19543419011&th=1 (https://www.amazon.com/Xentric-Guitars-Ignite-Fluorescent-Guitar/dp/B08D6YLYR6/ref=sr_1_11?dchild=1&qid=1620215922&sr=8-11&srs=19543419011&th=1)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: mr.squishy on Fri, 07 May 2021, 20:44:42
~snip~
That is beyond rad! Thank you!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: LaserCrafter on Fri, 07 May 2021, 22:22:36
any plans for gb date?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Mon, 10 May 2021, 22:38:06
Sorry for the lack of update still - I'm busy this week trying to finish up my taxes. No GB date yet - sorry.

Also admittedly I have been distracted a fair amount in the past month making and publishing force curves for switches, though I also believe that's been a more pressing need for the community as a whole, but I am going to pivot back to this project this week after I finish my taxes.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Alejo1707 on Fri, 14 May 2021, 11:41:12
Just learned about this project, and it sounds and looks great!

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: 1MachineElf on Sun, 16 May 2021, 12:07:25
This project is AWESOME!!!

I love the map of Boston on the back FR4 plate - this seems to be THE end-game keyboard for playing Fallout 4.

Your assembly guide is impressively (!!!) detailed: https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/blob/master/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/3D-printed%20case%20-%20parts/Draft%20instructions%20(barebones%20kit).pdf

Just today I learned about this keyboard from the DSS Late Harvest renders posted by NoPunIn10Did on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/MechanicalKeyboardsUK/comments/n4ovcr/gb_dss_late_harvest_ukiso_in_base_kit_est/
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: thicthock on Sun, 16 May 2021, 15:25:12
the first time my best friends actually likes a board.  :D
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: eibbun on Thu, 20 May 2021, 22:02:01
oh the gb never happened... here's to hoping it still happens one day :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Kuki on Tue, 25 May 2021, 02:51:38
Really looking forward to this one! (alu)
I'm not really a fan of those "dinky" <80% boards, so this really is a welcome change!
Should go nicely with the KAT Space Dust i just preordered  ;D
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Hamptonn on Tue, 25 May 2021, 06:34:49
Are the files still and b sides still available? I'd love to knock one of these together. Totally agree we need more 96+ boards.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Vardys on Sat, 05 June 2021, 00:24:11
Hate to be this guy but any updates? Really looking forward to the board, thanks for all the work so far!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Volny on Sat, 05 June 2021, 03:33:40
I got impatient waiting for this and decided on a bit of a whim to buy The Galleon (another 1800-style board that markets itself as being rather extravagant - the group buy ended today I believe). I got as far as the payment page and was about to hit the purchase button, when I decided I'd better put the layout into KLE to figure out whether it truly suited me. Turns out it simply didn't have enough keys for my needs. I need something a little less modest  :D So I'm back to eyeing this little cutie. Also eager for an update! :)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: illegal_emigrant on Sat, 05 June 2021, 16:59:43
I cannot wait to solder down 240 mill max sockets onto this bad boy
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Neely_12 on Sat, 05 June 2021, 20:44:57
My dad is really looking forward to this board. Hopefully we can get some more updates soon. Good luck!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Thu, 10 June 2021, 15:14:57
Sorry for the lack of updates - I've been pretty busy the past couple of weeks, and there's a fair amount of stuff I need to explain. Hopefully will have something this weekend.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: asmashedpumpkin on Thu, 10 June 2021, 20:01:21
One of my keeb goals is to get the premium alum version of this board for my GMK Nuclear Data keycaps on it so I can feel like Homer Simpson at work.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Realdrian on Fri, 11 June 2021, 01:09:13
Cant wait for the updates good or bad Pylon! love this board
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: JucheCatgirlTS on Thu, 17 June 2021, 13:00:23
Just dropping by to share a sound test of my build:


EDIT: I'm an idiot and posted the wrong link yesterday. It's fixed now. Sorry folks!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 18 June 2021, 00:36:07
Hi everyone - sorry for the late update.

I am aware that this IC thread is over 13 months old at this point and that this project is taking quite a bit of time to reach a proper GB. I am sorry for the lack of updates the past couple months. To be honest, this started off as a project while I was unemployed at the beginning of the COVID19 pandemic to make the keyboard I really wanted to use, and so the progress in the first couple months and making the prototypes was quite fast as I had a lot of time to devote to this project. However, I found a full-time job last fall, spent much of April and May doing force curve measurements of switches (https://github.com/bluepylons/Open-Switch-Curve-Meter/tree/main/Force%20curves), and with vaccines now widely available in the US and many things reopening here, I have had significantly less spare time to devote to this project. I am sorry that this is taking so long. That being said:

3D printed version:

Metal version:

(I apologize that these are not proper renders - I am no longer using Fusion 360, and I
do not know how to use Blender. Also, these do not have fasteners, bump-ons, etc. currently modeled)
[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=2]
[attachimg=3]
[attachimg=4]


Other serious complications for the project:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: ktkintner on Fri, 18 June 2021, 01:12:24
Thanks for the update! I'm looking forward to the metal version the most but I would definitely be in for one or two professionally 3D printed versions as well.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Volny on Fri, 18 June 2021, 07:02:09
Legalities aside, what are the practical consequences (if any) for a regular home user of the kind of radio interference you mention? Like, could they interfere with phone reception/wifi, or cause buzzing in audio speakers, or anything like that? Or is it basically an irrelevance, aside from the legal considerations?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: shutuphamish on Sat, 19 June 2021, 04:44:28
very keen for this board whenever it comes. its a big departure from my usual small is best philosophy but it will make a great home for my skidata relegendables
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Doblki on Sun, 20 June 2021, 07:04:17
Is the radio emission testing and authorization something we see with generally all the other group buy boards? Maybe you can reach out to past group buys or current IC's in the same region as you and ask how they dealt with it. This is surprisingly my first time hearing about this but it does make sense. I joined a group buy back in February on a board that had no mention of this either. Of course, I understand that if the testing and authorizing was not done for another board does not necessarily mean it's okay to forgo it for other boards.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: clik_clak on Sun, 20 June 2021, 07:35:51
I’m going to go out on a limb and say that not a single keyboard GB here has ever and will ever go through this testing.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Sun, 20 June 2021, 15:11:24
Legalities aside, what are the practical consequences (if any) for a regular home user of the kind of radio interference you mention? Like, could they interfere with phone reception/wifi, or cause buzzing in audio speakers, or anything like that? Or is it basically an irrelevance, aside from the legal considerations?

To be honest I don't have much knowledge about radio frequency interference, but I believe all of those are possible. Keyboards do not use much power though (usually well under 2W, unless you have backlight or underglow) and I believe are unlikely to cause serious issues, but it's quite possible you exceed legal limits. The first Ultimate Hacking Keyboard prototype failed its EMI/RFI tests (https://ultimatehackingkeyboard.com/blog/2017/01/20/the-first-sample-batch-and-emc-test). Of course you don't know unless you test, which is why testing is often legally required, but the tests are expensive, and most designers are unaware of EMI/RFI regulations.

For past boards - I know the CapsUnlocked 65 and the Drop Planck had to go through FCC and CE testing which delayed those respective group buys. The NK65 also went through testing (I emailed Novelkeys about it), but they don't display FCC markings on its case as they were planning on displaying it in software.

It is highly unlikely that the FCC will take enforcement action for not testing the board you built, but if the FCC clarifies that kit manufacturers do have to test (a reasonable position as it is unlikely end users will ever do testing, and these legal limits and requirements exist for a reason), failure for GB designers/runners to do testing may result in fines and mandatory recalls. This may significantly affect the customs scene in the future, and either lead to standardized PCBs and cases being sold separately by different entities (to legally qualify as "subassemblies" exempt from testing, rather than "kits", as discussed in the Sparkfun (https://www.sparkfun.com/tutorials/398) and EMC Fast Pass (https://emcfastpass.com/fcc-rules-kits-subassemblies/) articles), or GB runners pay for testing and authorization and raise prices. This would also push towards larger group buys (since testing is a fixed cost that can be spread out over many units) and make small group buys uneconomical.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Technofrikus on Tue, 22 June 2021, 01:33:04
...for my skidata relegendables

Wow. I didn't know these existed. They look fabulous! Quite the set price though.

Regarding the testing: if the rules change so that a kit (without switches and keys) is required to make these test i would think then other regulations regarding product security would also apply. I do this regulation stuff for a cargobike in Germany and there are many more regulations besides the radio tests so a CE sign can be put on the product. Not sure how that works in the US though. Hopefully this will not be necessary or legally enforced.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: whizzard on Fri, 25 June 2021, 22:01:02
I really love this keyboard. 

As far as complications mentioned.... not my place to say, really, but I wouldn't sweat the legal stuff so much as this is a hobby kit you are putting together.  In my non-legal opinion, the spirit of those laws is for the likes of the NK65, Planck, and other "mass-produced" boards.  If every single GB DIY keyboard had to go through all that testing, nothing would ever get released, and the hobby would be worse off for it.  And if that is something that is holding up such a nice kit, that would be a shame.  This is your project, and you need to figure out what you are comfortable with.  I just don't want you getting lost in the weeds with all that stuff when at the end of the day you are making prototype kits.  If you wanted to sell tens of thousands of fully put together products, that is different. That is just my two cents, and is not "legal advice".  Those laws are intended to protect everyday consumers, but shouldn't stifle creative efforts and small-scale production in the specialist hobby groups.

Again, this is beautiful, and it is getting harder and harder to find monster-size keyboards in this community lately where everything is about getting smaller, and we are spoiled for choice in the 60-65% category.  I don't even see many 75% anymore.  I have a keyset just for a 120% or larger collecting dust for over a year just waiting for a GB like this. 

Anyhow, good luck, and if there is a mailing list for the project that I didn't see in the post, let me know. I would like updates, even if they are slow coming.  Awesome work!  Oh yea, and I don't know what file type your models are in but I do know my way around Blender, and if I can help let me know.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: IneffableCrab on Sat, 03 July 2021, 14:15:23
I made an account just to follow this project. It scratches both my 1800 itch and my perpetual desire to have more keys. (Plus I just love the aesthetic choices here.)

Again, this is beautiful, and it is getting harder and harder to find monster-size keyboards in this community lately where everything is about getting smaller, and we are spoiled for choice in the 60-65% category.  I don't even see many 75% anymore.  I have a keyset just for a 120% or larger collecting dust for over a year just waiting for a GB like this.
For real. It's cartoonishly hard to find larger boards; I too have a 120% keyset that has been collecting dust in my closet for a little over a year now. :/
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: bkrownd on Sat, 03 July 2021, 15:10:22

250% or bust!   :cool:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: geauxflying on Sun, 04 July 2021, 13:05:31
Sharing my build of the 3D printed version. This is the first keyboard I have ever built, pretty cool first keyboard. Very happy with this board. Just need to hit the music shop for a telecaster knob.

A few comments about the build:
1) very impressed with how solid this is. It’s 3D printed, and it feels as nice as any other keyboard I have ever had, maybe best typing experience ever with the FR4 plate.
2) I had none of the issues with leveling that some other folks mentioned, I paid someone $75 to 3D print the case for me.
3) The instructions are excellent.
4) I think the “B stock” issue was that the plate for the numpad enter didn’t have a relief cut for the stabilizer. I just used a dremel and a small burr to cut a little rounded notch out.
5) I didn’t solder in hot swap sockets. My Kailh box pinks don’t fit well in mill max sockets and the PCB doesn’t support Kailh sockets (nbd).
6) The FR4 plate feels amazing to type on. I’ve never had an FR4 board before, I like it.


I may want to try building a custom case for it, maybe bamboo or something, but I really like the way it sounds in the 3d printed case.

The keycaps I used are a combination of KAT BoW and a B-stock kit of KAT milkshake (the milkshake kit was pretty bad, I couldn’t use a lot of it unfortunately). The

The 4th picture shows little stabilizer pads from UpgradeKeyboards.com. They are was easier than band-aid mods, and for $12 they send you enough pads to do LOTS of keyboards.

I really hope that the Aluminum version happens, this is a brilliant board. I think I will name it Botafogo (“fireboat”) after the Portuguese galleon of the same name!

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: geauxflying on Mon, 05 July 2021, 16:44:38
Here’s a clip to give people the sound of this keyboard with my Kailh Box Pink switches. I really love the sound and the feel with the FR4 plate.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Realdrian on Mon, 05 July 2021, 18:06:39
Here’s a clip to give people the sound of this keyboard with my Kailh Box Pink switches. I really love the sound and the feel with the FR4 plate.

That's awesome, thank you. I love everything about this board. Hope the metal one is coming along  :D
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: geauxflying on Wed, 07 July 2021, 10:41:49
If anyone wants to share bin files, this is my prelim layout. I'm assuming it's appropriate to share here since it's specific to this keyboard, but let me know if I'm breaking any rules.

A few comments

1) the rotary encoder doesn't work right now... (This is my first experience with QMK, and I'm learning that it is relative garbage, and I'm not a programmer so it's just taking me time to figure it out). I'm working on it, it's fun to learn about.
2) It's very similar to the default with the exception that I'm using a split space bar the MO (fn) key in the middle refers to layer 2. The only things on layer 2 right now are a num lock on the traditional num lock key, and a backspace where the right space bar is.
3) I changed the three keys between the numpad and the main keyboard to home/end/delete. I quickly found that I use them too much in normal typing not to have them close by.
4) Probably only need the "sleep" key at F13. No point to a wake key at F14 (hitting a key wakes the PC).
5) Things I might want to add:

As I figure out how to do these things, I can share bin files if anyone wants them. The board is beautiful to type on, sounds good, feels good, I just need to learn how to be a programmer to use QMK (although, I understand that there may be VIAL support coming soon).
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (updated specs, 3D-printed version pics)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 07 July 2021, 23:52:44
Hey everyone - I just got a Vial build up and running. Vial (https://get.vial.today/) is an open-source alternative to VIA that lets you reprogram your keymap just like VIA, but adds a couple of extra features such as rotary encoder support and an unlock keycode for improved security.

(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/847128084280508426/862547189799452712/unknown.png)

Note that Vial is currently in beta, and there may be bugs. Use at your own risk. The Vial firmware for Boston has also only been tested on the standard layout, and although alt layouts (ISO, WKL, etc.) are supported they have not been tested and may have issues. Please contact me regarding any issues or bugs.

The Vial firmware is available on Github here (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/tree/master/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/Firmware%20-%20Vial). To use Vial, you will need to flash the boston_vial.bin file (using QMK Toolbox, dfu-util, or another utility). After you download and open Vial, Vial should recognize the keyboard, and let you remap keys. Note that you have to actually implement your changes in Vial you have to go to Security > Unlock, and hold down the security combo (Esc and Enter). This is a security feature to prevent unauthorized secret modification of your keyboard firmware.

Vial has  a Discord server (https://discord.gg/6Ybrtvj6Ae) if you want to follow up on the project.

No other updates at this time.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: geauxflying on Thu, 08 July 2021, 00:25:24
You're the best! Works great, already updated my keymap! Split space, and all 3 layers used, with macros, no issues, easy peasy. Thanks Pylon!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Volny on Sun, 11 July 2021, 07:15:37
Personally, I don't much care whether the keyboard shell is made from plastic, metal, or marshmallow. I'm in it for the great functionality not the looks, so I just want the keyboard. Given that, which do you think will be the earliest available version? Your recent update suggests that the plastic version has a lower priority, yet it also suggests that it'll come significantly sooner - possibly early November*, whereas the metal one seems to be stuck in an indefinite machine shop limbo, as well as waiting for further PCB refinement.

I get that the plastic version won't have the optimal aesthetics and may not have the C3 daughterboard and such, but in terms of the key layout and the programmability potential, will it be functionally the same as the metal one, or may the metal one have superior features/dependability or something like that? Also, if most PCB manufacturers require a minimum order of 5, and you no longer want to faff around with doing a 3D-printed groupbuy, would you perhaps be willing to run a groupbuy just for the PCBs alone?



* you actually wrote "end of July", though I long ago learned that such statements must always be converted using the magic formula  a=e  (where e=estimated time & a=actual time) ;) Don't take it personally, I apply that formula to everyone, including myself, and it almost always proves accurate (or overly optimistic).
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: whizzard on Sun, 25 July 2021, 20:19:07
I just wanted to post again because this keyboard really deserves to be made.  And not just because I am from Boston, but that helps.  I love customs, but I don't understand why so so many are 60-65%.   I know that is the popular style right now, but some of us love battleships and nobody but Pylon, and this project, has a glimmer of hope for one right now.  If there is anything I can do to help the project, just let me know.  Vial firmware looks good.  Keep it up! :)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Volny on Sun, 25 July 2021, 23:38:29
Totally. Also, aside from the quantity of keys in question, the Boston simply has the smartest layout of any keyboard I've seen.

It knows to give the arrow keys some physical separation, but without the excessive wasted space of a regular full size, and without banishing the entire nav cluster to an inconvenient top corner like a traditional 1800.

And unlike all the hipster 60% boards it's smart enough to know that there's little practical benefit to conserving vertical real estate, so fully utilises that 2nd F-row while concentrating on conserving precious horizontal real estate instead.

The Boston layout simply makes more design sense than just about any other keyboard on the market IMO, at least for anyone who needs to do more than type a few emails. It should be the defacto standard rather than a niche outlier.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: whizzard on Wed, 28 July 2021, 22:56:24
Totally. Also, aside from the quantity of keys in question, the Boston simply has the smartest layout of any keyboard I've seen.

It knows to give the arrow keys some physical separation, but without the excessive wasted space of a regular full size, and without banishing the entire nav cluster to an inconvenient top corner like a traditional 1800.

And unlike all the hipster 60% boards it's smart enough to know that there's little practical benefit to conserving vertical real estate, so fully utilises that 2nd F-row while concentrating on conserving precious horizontal real estate instead.

The Boston layout simply makes more design sense than just about any other keyboard on the market IMO, at least for anyone who needs to do more than type a few emails. It should be the defacto standard rather than a niche outlier.

Couldn't agree with your post more.  I can't see a thing wrong with this layout.  The directionals position and the three keys between the numpad and main keys are a great idea as well.  They make a great spot for a delete key and macros.  I can think of so many things that you could do with this board, and the extra F row could be a great re-legendable or artisan display row. 

You can tell that the layout was not an afterthought and was definitely a focus of the design.  I think the number of units this would sell would be very surprising as many of us would like a keyboard like this.  Just staying positive and hoping for the best for this project and the designer.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: wowaweewa on Thu, 29 July 2021, 07:50:45
Will definitely keep an eye on this project. Bought a G80-11800 Compaq a month ago, and I really like the layout. I'm not going to use it as my main board, as I like the Alice layout too much, but these boards are very handy when it comes to working with programs like Blender and various Adobe software. The double function key row is amazing!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Joojeh on Fri, 30 July 2021, 11:05:22
Would love to see a metal version of this board go into group buy. Been seeing too many FRL boards, we need more FRows. Boston to the moon. FRow to the moon. Good luck boss  :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: achingfingers on Mon, 02 August 2021, 06:14:52
KIV this one
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Jaygles on Tue, 03 August 2021, 07:51:04
+1. I've been waiting for a decent sized keyboard for quite some time and this hits the mark
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: geauxflying on Wed, 04 August 2021, 20:39:21
Just as an FYI for folks, the GMMK knob works great for the rotary encoder on this one.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: sevennationarmy on Wed, 04 August 2021, 21:58:23
Oh man do I not only want this but NEED this in my life. I am going to wait as long as it takes!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: shuijiao on Thu, 05 August 2021, 00:29:19
Huge fan of the boston design proposed on the bottom of the board!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Volny on Sat, 14 August 2021, 03:40:13
Yeah, I don't have any emotional connection to Boston, but even I think the map design is really cool, and will make an already awesome keyboard even more special. Though I wonder if it would be even better with some thinner line weights in areas. Like if the red area in the pic below had line weights more similar to those the green areas. I get that the red area is obviously a downtown area and has wider streets in real life. But at this scale, with such a high contrast between line and background, the detail seems to get a bit overwhelmed. Still cool though!

(https://bit.ly/3xL1pP0)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: geauxflying on Sat, 14 August 2021, 23:34:15
Yeah, I don't have any emotional connection to Boston, but even I think the map design is really cool, and will make an already awesome keyboard even more special. Though I wonder if it would be even better with some thinner line weights in areas. Like if the red area in the pic below had line weights more similar to those the green areas. I get that the red area is obviously a downtown area and has wider streets in real life. But at this scale, with such a high contrast between line and background, the detail seems to get a bit overwhelmed. Still cool though!

Show Image
(https://bit.ly/3xL1pP0)


I like it as is... the reflective nature of it is striking with the bold lines. It's an art piece, more striking in person. Not intended to be a navigational aid.

I'm anxious to know if there will be any updates. Looking forward to the metal version if it happens, and curious if the 3d printed version will be run again. I know Pylon has been busy, but I hope this project stays alive - the 3D printed boards that I have are the nicest boards I have by a wide margin. Good work.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: geauxflying on Sat, 14 August 2021, 23:57:36
Has anyone made any other versions of STL files since Pylon open-sourced the 3D printed version? I'd be curious to see what changes people made. I'm in tinkering mode, and figured I'd see what ideas other folks had.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Tue, 17 August 2021, 00:32:59
Hey everyone - I figure I should give a brief update:

Where things are at:

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Technofrikus on Thu, 19 August 2021, 10:14:45
Vial is so great! Ported all my Boards to it. Glad you like it as well!

Looking forward to the alu version! Here is some input from me, in case you are interested: I would prefer the overhang of the top part to be either bigger or smaller. If it is bigger it looks more like it is floating. If it is smaller (not there) it looks like one big piece (like the 3d printed version). If it is there I would pull it down in the front so the front is only the overhang, without the lower part visible.
Regarding chamfers: why not chamfer "everything"? Not the overhang, but the angled bottom? This would be used to pick the board up, so a hard edge would not be that pleasant.

You are probably settled on the layout, but my small complaint about it is the white space on the right of the arrow keys. It not symmetric and looks not pleasant to me. Like a little accident. Maybe move the three keys a little to the right, add a fourth on the bottom and fill the gap this way? Not sure this would work. Or take a slice of the rect1800. They pushed the three keys to the numpad on the right. This works great as well.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: IneffableCrab on Mon, 23 August 2021, 18:50:41
  • Metal version redesign - currently focusing most of my available time getting this done. I'm a little stuck here visual design wise on how to get the angled bottom to be visually cohesive with the top - I'm a little unhappy with the visual cohesiveness and consistency between the various fillets, chamfered edges, and unchamfered edges on the bottom and side cutouts right now. I'm going to try modeling some other ideas later this week to see how they look, but might just end up going with the current design.
I'm a complete philistine when it comes to industrial design, but the bottom edge didn't really bother me in those renders.

Yeah, I don't have any emotional connection to Boston, but even I think the map design is really cool, and will make an already awesome keyboard even more special. Though I wonder if it would be even better with some thinner line weights in areas. Like if the red area in the pic below had line weights more similar to those the green areas. I get that the red area is obviously a downtown area and has wider streets in real life. But at this scale, with such a high contrast between line and background, the detail seems to get a bit overwhelmed. Still cool though!

Show Image
(https://bit.ly/3xL1pP0)


I like it as is... the reflective nature of it is striking with the bold lines. It's an art piece, more striking in person. Not intended to be a navigational aid.(...)
It's also very reflective of the chaotic mess that is Boston's street layout. Trust me, I commute there every day.

But yeah, I do kinda agree that the line weight could be a little thinner in that area.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: whizzard on Fri, 27 August 2021, 19:50:13
Hi, Pylon; just dropping in to show my support.  Thank you so much for the update you gave, and keep up the great work!  I was so happy to see you find some more time to work on this.  It is looking amazing, and I look forward to whatever you come up with. :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Sun, 29 August 2021, 00:14:36
Thanks for the support everyone.

Looking forward to the alu version! Here is some input from me, in case you are interested: I would prefer the overhang of the top part to be either bigger or smaller. If it is bigger it looks more like it is floating. If it is smaller (not there) it looks like one big piece (like the 3d printed version). If it is there I would pull it down in the front so the front is only the overhang, without the lower part visible.

I tried changing the overhang to a seam and I actually liked how it looked. Definitely appreciate your suggestion! I will probably incorporate this into the final design.

This is how the metal version is looking right now - I played around with different side/bottom profiles and ended up liking this one. I'm still working on getting the design done (need to make the new plate, figure out the daughterboard mounting, slightly revise how the RGB LED indicator attaches, and make production drawings).

(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/681193228078416006/879507745290731550/unknown.png)
(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/681193228078416006/879507794234064926/unknown.png)
(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/847128084280508426/878669381419286558/unknown.png)

Unfortunately I'm no longer on Fusion 360 (I don't want to deal with a subscription), Atom3D doesn't do renders, and my Blender rendering skills are nonexistent, so no renders yet - proto photos are much more likely than renders at this point.

You are probably settled on the layout, but my small complaint about it is the white space on the right of the arrow keys. It not symmetric and looks not pleasant to me. Like a little accident. Maybe move the three keys a little to the right, add a fourth on the bottom and fill the gap this way? Not sure this would work. Or take a slice of the rect1800. They pushed the three keys to the numpad on the right. This works great as well.

I've thought a lot about this, and unfortunately - there really isn't a good way to resolve this, keep the 2u numpad 0 key, keep arrow key separation, and have a good looking bezel.

Making it wider to add a 4th key to fill the gap results in uneven bezels elsewhere, and also makes the keyboard wider:
[attachimg=1]

 The best solution layout-wise is actually to do something similar to the Evolv 75% (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=104531.0) and use a 1.5u Shift key to maintain even bezels while adding a 4th key to fill in the gap. Unfortunately, very, very few keysets offer a 1.5u Shift, and most people are going to have to drop a 1.5u Ctrl or Alt key in that position, which results in inaccurate legends, which will bother many people more than current awkward gap.
[attachimg=2]

 You can do something similar with 2u left shift (similar to what 60%'s with arrow keys do, such as the GK64XS). More sets include 2u left shift than 1.5u Shift, but it's still not included in many sets. This also shifts the key stagger over 0.25u, and this makes ISO support awkward, so it's not a great solution either.
[attachimg=3]

I've also thought about putting something else in the gap, like a badge, but I'm personally just not a fan of badges (I dislike branding on the front of things like phones and keyboards), and I wouldn't really know what symbol to put on there (I can't think of any small, Boston-related symbols that isn't a copyrighted sports team logo). I've also thought about putting the RGB layer indicator there, but it's far away from the 2nd F-row where that light is supposed to indicate, and visually I think it's more useful higher up next to the second F-row. The Austin (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=102542.0) puts its lock lights there, but I don't want to just straight up copy that, and I also like the traditional 3 lock LEDs below the F-row.

In the end the gap doesn't bother me that much personally on the proto I've been typing on, and I'm really not a fan of the alternatives.

Re: the map on the bottom of the 3D printed version - those photos are a bit blown out as I photographed them outside. This is what it looks like in dimmer lighting:
[attachimg=4]

Most PCB fabs have a file-size limit for the manufacturing files they accept (e.g. JLCPCB has a 10MB file limit), and including extremely fine lines significantly increases the file size and export times unfortunately (the current files took ~14 hours to export from KiCAD). I can take another look at this though when I have time.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Volny on Sun, 29 August 2021, 08:46:07
Oh, the map looks totally fine, actually. It was obviously just the lighting in the other one that was throwing me.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: geauxflying on Sun, 29 August 2021, 22:32:56
My feedback after using the 3D printed board for a while…

1. The space by the arrow keys is a total non-issue.
2. I’m not sure what the purpose of the LED by the rotary encoder is. It looks nice and doesn’t bother me, and that might be its only function (which would be fine).
3. More onboard memory could be good, and maybe a USB pass through. Not absolutely necessary though.
4. It could be a little bit lower in the front (probably not an issue for the metal case).

Overall the best keyboard I have used.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: sabomov on Wed, 01 September 2021, 04:54:52
bottom with a map looks awesome!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Inner-Ear on Fri, 10 September 2021, 15:36:11
Haven't posted in a while, but I just wanted to follow-up and say that this is easily my favorite keyboard. It is such a joy to use. The implementation of Vial really makes this the best. The rotary encoder support and ease of creating macros makes it my preferred keyboard programming too.  All in all, a complete package of a keyboard.


Now if we could only get an ALPS version (hey, one can dream  ;))
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Jaygles on Fri, 01 October 2021, 20:59:30
Any updates on this?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: vishydesigns on Fri, 01 October 2021, 21:14:11
why does this actually look dope?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Technofrikus on Sat, 02 October 2021, 04:34:14
I tried changing the overhang to a seam and I actually liked how it looked. Definitely appreciate your suggestion! I will probably incorporate this into the final design.

This is how the metal version is looking right now - I played around with different side/bottom profiles and ended up liking this one.     

Wow, looks really good! Very glad my input was of value :)

And thanks for the detailed explanation regarding the small gap in the layout. The 1.5u shiftkey version would look perfect. But the kitting problem is a real one. So your solution is probably the best :) I agree with the badge, dont like them.

And great that you offer split spacebar! Love me a split :)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 15 October 2021, 23:20:18
Quick update:



Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Volny on Sat, 23 October 2021, 02:37:01
Just a heads up: If anyone wants one of these PCBs, you might be able to buy one from me in a while, if you don't want to have to order the MOQ of 5. I'm pretty keen on this keyboard so I'm probably going to order for myself. If so, I'll probably keep one as a backup, which will leave me with 3 that I can sell. I would sell them at cost, plus postage (from Australia).

This won't include the 3D-printed case, but only the PCB and its related items (plate, bottom map panel, bumpon holders). I'll probably order everything as lead-free, and black, except for the PCBs themselves which I'll probably order as green (to make it easier to see traces). I'll get the PCB pre-assembled with diodes and all that, but it won't have the microprocessor, as these are still out of stock at JLPCB. You'll have to order one yourself from somewhere like Aliexpress, like I did, and drag-solder it onto the PCB yourself.

I haven't ordered anything yet, and I make no promises about when or whether I will. But just letting you guys know in case someone doesn't want to order 5 and doesn't mind waiting a bit. If/when I do make an order, then I'll post again here with confirmation and more precise info.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Volny on Tue, 02 November 2021, 22:58:15
UPDATE: Sorry, all 3 spares have now been claimed.
 One person backed out so there's still 1 left. PM me if you want it.
.
All gone now.


I'll keep in touch with those 3 people via PM in the coming days/weeks, and I'll post here once I've received the PCBs from JLPCB to let you all know how it went. I can confirm that the ordering process itself was quite painless, thanks to Pylon's comprehensive guide.

OK, I've ordered 5 PCBs myself. I'll keep 2, so will be able to sell the remaining 3 to anyone who wants them. Though really just 2, as one person has already declared interest via PM last week, so I'm reserving one for that person. Update: all gone  -Actually, still 1 left

To be clear from the outset: I'm not a shop - I'm just a guy. I bought the keyboard for myself at the minimum quantity of 5, and want to offload the surplus to cover some of my costs (I'm not selling them at a profit but at cost, give or take a buck or two for rounding, including the cost of initial postage from JLPCB to me). I'm an honest guy, but I'm still just a guy. Once the PCBs arrive to me, I'll send them on to you asap, but don't expect frequent status updates, lightning-quick response times to PMs, or technical advice (I'm new at most of this stuff myself). I also won't accept any returns if something's not working. Pylon's ordering guide states that these have not been prototyped yet, and to buy at the purchaser's own risk - that risk applies to you just as it does to me!

Details below:

What is included: All FR4 parts only:
-PCB - the PCB will be assembled by the factory with SMT parts except the microcontroller and a fuse, which will both be missing (see below)
-Plate
-bottom (ie. city map) panel
-2x bumpon holders
....All the above are in Black lead-free HASL-RoHS finish.


What you'll need to source on your own:
-3D printed case
-All desired non-FR4 parts, as listed in Pylon's ordering guide (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/tree/master/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/3D%20printed%20version), like screws, reset switch, rotary encoder, lock LEDs, etc.
-128kb STM32F072CB-series microcontroller. These are still out of stock at JLPCB so you'll need to buy one individually from somewhere like aliexpress (that's what I did) and drag-solder it to the PCB yourself. See Pylon's guide for compatible microcontrollers.
-A 1812L075PR resettable fuse. These are also out of stock, so you'll need to buy your own and solder it yourself, as with the microcontroller. I suspect this will be more trivial than the microcontroller, both in terms of cost and skill required. UPDATE: These are dirt cheap, so I ordered a few extras, and will throw one in with your package. You'll still need to solder it yourself though.

When:

-I've ordered these today, and JLCB estimates that they'll arrive to me in Australia within 10 days. If I post with economy post to USA/Europe, it will supposedly take another 2-3 weeks. So hope for them in early December, but it's 2021, so expect delays.

Cost per PCB (incl. plate, bottom panel, bumpons):
to Australia: $75AUD incl. economy shipping
to US: $72USD incl. economy shipping
to Europe: 65EUR incl. economy shipping
to UK: 55 pounds incl. economy shipping
...for other countries and/or faster (and more expensive) shipping, PM me.

Payment method:
If you want one, and I still have one that's unclaimed, PM me. I'll then give you my paypal email. Once I've received payment (and once the PCBs arrive from JLPCB) I'll post it.

Finally, a massive thankyou to Pylon for putting in all this work so that we can get our hands on this wonderful keyboard :) :) :)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: windlabs on Thu, 04 November 2021, 02:56:39
nice board and keep good work
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Totoro on Thu, 04 November 2021, 03:35:46
This is an interest check for a compact 120% keyboard I'm working on, with a layout inspired by the Driftmechanics Austin (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=102542.0). This is the first custom keyboard I've designed, though I have a mechanical engineering background and have done other electronics projects before.

Show Image
(https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/blob/master/graphics/bostonKLE.png?raw=true)


The original post is a bit outdated - please see this update (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=106501.msg3059822#msg3059822). I will update the original page when I have time.

There will be two case options - a CNC aluminum one, and a 3D-printed/FR4 one.

General Specifications:
  • 121-keys - full-size + 18 programmable keys
  • About 2u narrower than a regular full-size
  • Traditional 2x3 Ins/Del/Home/End/PgUp/PgDn nav block
  • Full-sized numpad with 2u "0" key
  • ISO, split-backspace, split 0, and numpad = key support (on universal plate)
  • Rotary encoder support, above the Esc key
  • USB-C
  • STM32F072 controller
  • QMK and Vial support (Vial is currently in beta)
  • Optional single-color LED backlight support
  • Single RGBLED to indicate layer status
  • Electrical schematic and firmware largely derived from the Austin. Case and PCB are different.

3D-printed/FR4 version:
  • 4-piece 3D-printed case, with FR4 bottom panel. STL and STEP files are available on the Github here if you want to print it yourself - you need a minimum 200 long x 150 wide x 210mm tall mm build area, which is achievable by many budget printers (e.g. Ender 3). Prototypes were printed on an Ender 3.
  • Colors depend on what color PLA/PLA+ filament I can have access to , but will probably be offering a variety of colors
  • Top mount (technically, though an unusual implementation of it)
  • FR4 plate only
  • 6.5° typing angle

Sound test of the 3D-printed/FR4 version (with Cherry MX Clears,spring ends lubed with Permatex dielectric grease, rails lubed with u/hbheroinbob's Loob-3g, and filmed with Deskey films. Stabilizers are C3Equalz. GMK Bingsu installed)

IC Form specifically for the 3D-printed version only  (https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeIJ2jjQXNM53C7ovwoUKfZ9U1PVOrajU6r16sreuFScfQhMQ/viewform?usp=sf_link)

FCC 47 CFR § 2.803(c)(2)(iii) disclaimer:
Quote
This device has not been authorized in the United States as required by the rules of the Federal Communications Commission. This device is not, and may not be, offered for sale or lease, or sold or leased in the United States, until authorization is obtained.

Prototype pics of the 3D-printed/FR4 version (with OG Cherry WoB and GMK Neon RGBY mods)
(Attachment Link)
Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=250894;image)

Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=250896;image)

Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=250898;image)

Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=250900;image)

Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=250902;image)

(the one on the left is an older aluminum prototype)
Show Image
(https://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=106501.0;attach=250904;image)


CNC aluminum version

The design for the aluminum version is being reworked again - please see this update (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=106501.msg3059822#msg3059822). I will update the specs below once that design is done, but the older specs are below:
  • 3-piece CNC aluminum case, with bottom brass weight (edit: due to the size of the keyboard it's more than heavy enough with everything made out of aluminum, so a brass bottom is unlikely at this point)
  • Top-mount
  • Knob will be underlit with an RGBLED, to indicate layer status (or whatever other purpose you want to use it for)
  • Tentatively intending to offer clear (silver) and black anodization, which were the two most requested colors. Dark gray was the third most requested color on the old IC form, and might also be offered.
  • Brass plate. This was by far the most popular requested plate material. I'll publish plate DXF files if people want to make plates using other materials.
  • 6.4° typing angle. 0° with the bottom weight removed (there will be bumpon cutouts for 0° if so desired.

Thanks everyone for filling out the IC Form on the aluminum version. I've gotten more than enough feedback on that one, so I took down the IC Form for the aluminum version.

I apologize for not having keycaps or fasteners, and for the generally rushed nature of the renders below. I'm not great with renders, and I've been very busy lately and would prefer to spend time either working on the design or the prototypes. I'll update these with prototype pics once it's built.

(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)

With black mid and bottom pieces:

(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)

Pictures of the older aluminum case (this was an older design that put the controller on a separate PCB. This particular proto is also missing its RGB indicator light and its rotary encoder). I will not be running this:

(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)


The layout for this was inspired by the Austin and also by the 7-row Thinkpad keyboard (http://www.notebookreview.com/picture/?f=60846) you find on Thinkpads of the T420 generation and older. The name is somewhat a pun off Austin since the layout is derived from it, and because I grew up (and currently live) near the city Boston, Massachusetts.

This project uses the open-source Acheron library from the Acheron project (http://acheronproject.com/). KiCAD PCB files are available at my Github below. STL files and STEP files of the 3D-printed version are available here below under the CERN OHL-W (which is fairly permissive), and you are free to use the files to make one yourself. Unfortunately, due to arrangements I'm working out with my manufacturer and vendor, it is unlikely that the metal case will be open-sourced as originally planned.
https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston

Unfortunately,

Many thanks to Gondolindrim for the Acheron project and for feedback on the early PCBs, and to the designers of the Driftmechanics Austin (Driftingbunnies, PheonixStarr and Gondolindrim) from which this was derived. Also thank you to all 129 people that filled out the old IC form - your feedback was definitely appreciated. At this point I've collected more than enough data, so I took down the form.

MouserPounder made a signature graphic if people want to put these in their signatures (this has a picture of the older prototype)

Code: [Select]
[url=https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=106501.0][img width=304 height=120]https://i.imgur.com/LYOA5Fp.jpg[/img][/url]
(post revisions)
May 20, 2020 - Initial post
May 20, 2020 - Replaced renders with ones that accurately depict the seam in the middle
May 29, 2020 - Moved F-keys over rightward slightly. Bottom weight is now aluminum instead of brass as the keyboard is pretty heavy to begin with.
June 2, 2020 - Corrected some references to the Austin
June 19, 2020 - Added pictures of prototype (without LEDs or rotary encoder installed)
June 20, 2020 - Added signature link that MousePounder made 
July 4, 2020 - Updated signature link
July 12, 2020 - Reorganized feature list, added plate files to Github
August 16, 2020 - Shortened title
September 3, 2020 - Revised post significantly. Removed a lot of outdated info. Added pictures of the 3D-printed version
September 5, 2020 - Fixed required build area to 3D print the case (I overstated the necessary build area). Added some rough tentative pricing for the 3D-printed version. Added IC Form for 3D-printed version.
October 12, 2020 - Added sound test of the 3D-printed version.
January 25, 2021 - Some minor edits, added top pictures of the 3D printed version
February 5, 2021 - Updated the IC in general, removed a lot of out-of-date info. Changed license to CERN OHL-W.
March 27, 2021 - Removed prices
April 11, 2021 - Added FCC disclaimer

gooood
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Thu, 11 November 2021, 21:20:48
Thanks Volny for taking the plunge! Let me know how it goes!

Various updates:

Pics of the case:
[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=2]
[attachimg=3]
[attachimg=4]
[attachimg=5]
[attachimg=6]
[attachimg=7]

I'll be ordering a second prototype with a standard matte bead-blasted finish with anodization after I build this one up and get some time on it. I'm debating trying to laser etch the map of Boston on the back of the metal one - this would be really nice, but I'm pretty worried about whether it'll come out well, and it would add cost and be another item to QC. I've seen some pretty good quality laser marks on other items I own (e.g. my Motu M2 audio interface's items are all lasered, and the quality is excellent), but am not sure how to replicate it.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Thu, 11 November 2021, 21:25:49
(forgot to post a pic from the front)
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: beigeandbrown on Thu, 11 November 2021, 21:42:57
I would honestly like a raw machined finish
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: NP3 on Thu, 11 November 2021, 23:38:02
This is pretty sick! Looking forward to this one, looking good.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Jaygles on Fri, 12 November 2021, 07:48:05
Looks slick

Would the feet be easily replaceable?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Realdrian on Fri, 12 November 2021, 12:58:54
I would honestly like a raw machined finish

Same here! it looks so nice! I wouldn't mind any scuffs. Wow I love it
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Volny on Sun, 14 November 2021, 17:34:39
My PCBs have shipped to me, and should be here hopefully in a few days. I'll upload a photo when they arrive. JLCPCB contacted me to warn me that they can't guarantee that the map won't have aesthetic flaws.

I've also ordered some replacement voltage regulators, as mentioned in Pylon's above post, so will throw one in to the PCBs I send.

Still one left!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: whizzard on Sun, 14 November 2021, 21:03:18
Can't tell you how excited I am to see you are making progress, keep up the great work.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Tue, 16 November 2021, 23:26:12
Thanks for the support everyone!

I also really like raw machined aluminum in general. It might end up as an option if I can have the manufacturer handle it better, and likely with a disclaimer that you will accept the risk of your case arriving with scratches. I also could look into anodizing over raw aluminum, though it won't end up as shiny with anodizing over it.

Would the feet be easily replaceable?

They're standard adhesive rubber feet.

Also as a shoutout - GMK Relegendables+ (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=115312.0) is currently in group buy, and is an excellent option for filling out the 18 extra macro keys on Boston, as they're all R1 profile and work great on the second F-row. I have relegendable keys on many of the photos of the prototypes shown, and the ones the GB are for identical caps. (I got my current set of black relegendables off an old Cherry G80-8200HUAUS-2 board).


Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: bkrownd on Wed, 17 November 2021, 04:23:15

Good point on the relegendables.  I've been intending to use all that real estate for novelties and artisans, nevertheless it would be good to have some relegendables on hand.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: scapegoat4 on Wed, 24 November 2021, 03:51:04
This is a sick project. I'm not someone who'd use a board with a layout like this but I've sent it over to a few of my friends who are def interested. Hopefully all goes well in the coming months with all the prototyping!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: jivex5k on Mon, 29 November 2021, 04:36:39
Extremely interested in this.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: lllchevy350lll on Mon, 29 November 2021, 09:48:16
any update on a metal case version? i really like the 3d printed version, but a nice premium aluminum case would only make this better.

Also, as mentioned above, what is the light for next to the rotary encoder?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: neru on Mon, 29 November 2021, 10:26:20
May I ask how much did you pay for prototyping the CNC alu case, I am interested in this board, let me know the price since I would love to make the alu case. Though if it is out of my budget, I could still do the 3d printed one.  ;D ;D
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Mon, 29 November 2021, 22:32:44
any update on a metal case version? i really like the 3d printed version, but a nice premium aluminum case would only make this better.

Sorry I still need to send out the PCB order for the metal version PCBs and FR4 plates. I keep catching small details on the PCB and plate that were missed that needed correction, which was what I spent last week doing, and am going to run final checks this week (hopefully nothing else turns up).

Also, as mentioned above, what is the light for next to the rotary encoder?

It's an RGBLED - it's currently a layer indicator (which is implemented in the default firmware but required some custom QMK code) in case people want to run the macro keys on different layers and have an indicator of what layer they're set to, but other than that I have not used it for anything else.

May I ask how much did you pay for prototyping the CNC alu case, I am interested in this board, let me know the price since I would love to make the alu case. Though if it is out of my budget, I could still do the 3d printed one.  ;D ;D

The proto case was run through SuNPe and cost me about $470 after shipping and fees. There's some minor quality issues (e.g. use of ball end mill passes for the 45° chamfers, and some tolerancing issues) that I need to resolve, and I would like an anodized prototype at some point, so I will be getting a second proto after I assemble and use the first one.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: neru on Tue, 30 November 2021, 06:05:35
Thank you for the reply, I guess I will do the 3d printed one haha, one last thing, is the 3d printed one heavy ? I could leave some coins inside in the event of it being kinda light.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Tue, 30 November 2021, 07:14:13
My 3D printed one weighs 1.1kg fully built (with switches and keycaps). Printed with 3 layers and 20% triangular infill.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: hussar_name on Tue, 30 November 2021, 08:27:35
Hello pylon, would you consider also adding a 100% standard layout version, if this project goes on?

Currently there is no option to purchase a full layout keyboard with qmk, except maybe from GON.

Thanks for considering  this.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: lllchevy350lll on Tue, 30 November 2021, 22:42:38
appreciate the response Pylon! Cant wait to get my hands on an aluminum boston. will be keeping an eye on this for sure
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Thu, 02 December 2021, 09:43:31
Unfortunately the PCBs and prototype will likely be delayed as I fractured my right arm in a bike crash. I'm going to see how well I can solder with my left hand, but it may be delayed several weeks until things heal up.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Thu, 02 December 2021, 09:49:01
Hello pylon, would you consider also adding a 100% standard layout version, if this project goes on?


Pretty unlikely as I'm busy with a couple of other projects right now.

Have you checked out the Dino104? There's also the Austin, though that's not a traditional full size. There's also QMK-compatible controller replacements (e.g. Black Petal) for some Filco and Rosewill full-sized boards. There's also open-source replacement PCBs for the G80-3000, and there's also the NKBM-ST110r2.1 replacement PCB for Filcos and Rosewills (though that requires working with text-only QMK)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: hussar_name on Thu, 02 December 2021, 10:27:34
Thanks, I didn't know about those option. The dino is impressive. A real beast.   :)) :)) :)) :))

Hello pylon, would you consider also adding a 100% standard layout version, if this project goes on?


Pretty unlikely as I'm busy with a couple of other projects right now.

Have you checked out the Dino104? There's also the Austin, though that's not a traditional full size. There's also QMK-compatible controller replacements (e.g. Black Petal) for some Filco and Rosewill full-sized boards. There's also open-source replacement PCBs for the G80-3000, and there's also the NKBM-ST110r2.1 replacement PCB for Filcos and Rosewills (though that requires working with text-only QMK)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Technofrikus on Thu, 02 December 2021, 10:31:32
Unfortunately the PCBs and prototype will likely be delayed as I fractured my right arm in a bike crash. I'm going to see how well I can solder with my left hand, but it may be delayed several weeks until things heal up.
Damn! That sucks get well soon!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: hussar_name on Thu, 02 December 2021, 10:51:08
Very sorry for your accident too. Just think that if your prototype keyboard had fallen on your feet, the damage would be greater than what you're suffering now  :)) :))
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Volny on Thu, 09 December 2021, 06:45:12
I've built my Boston now using the parts I bought from JLCPCB (also, all my spares have now been snatched up by other users), and it's terrific. I won't defile Pylon's thread with any photos yet, because my 3D printed case hasn't arrived yet so it's currently just the naked keyboard sitting on a piece of cardboard! But I've soldered it (all hotswappable with millmax sockets - not cheap, but boy does it make life easier!), set up the QMK, and am using it happily. It's easily the best keyboard I've ever used, though that statement is a no-brainer, because keyboards are all about functionality for me, and the Boston objectively has the most functionality of any keyboard I've used. I've been excited for this keyboard for a long time now. I'd actually been working on my keycap layout, switch selection and QMK firmware for months already! (By the way, 1.25u keys work really nicely for the nav cluster trio). The Boston was my birthday present, and a very successful birthday present it has been indeed!

My main criticism of the design, and it's a fairly minor criticism, is that I wish that the gap between the top 2 rows and the rest was 0.25u instead of 0.5u. Many 100% keyboards use a 0.25u gap here, so an extra-wide 0.5u gap seems a pity on a keyboard that already contains an extra back row that must be reached. Actually, this turned out to be much less of a problem than I feared it would be, although I have long fingers so others may feel the gap more.

The placement of the 3 indicator LEDs seems a strange design decision to me. When I saw that one of them was directly above numlock and one was directly below scrolllock, I naturally assumed that those 2 LEDs would correspond to those keys, with the 3rd (leftmost, hence closest to the alpha keys...) LED corresponding to capslock. Yet the way they're setup in the default firmware (and physically marked on the PCB) is different: the LED next to numlock is for scrolllock, the LED below scrolllock is for capslock, and the leftmost LED is for numlock. This feels unintuitive to me. It's not a big deal though, as you can swap them around in QMK if it bothers you. I personally don't even use those LEDs, as I don't use the scrolllock function, I've eradicated all numlock functionality from my system (I got sick of certain programs always switching numlock without my permission so replaced it with a customised numlock-like layer in QMK that those programs can no longer touch), and I've programmed QMK to display the capslock status on the RGB light anyway. That RGB light is great. It's in a good spot where it's conveniently visible but unobtrusive. Apart from capslock, I also use it to show when certain layers are active or when a dynamic macro is being recorded.

Once everything added up, buying the parts at JLCPCB ended up more expensive than I initially expected. But the process of ordering the parts itself was painless, largely due to Pylon's excellent instructions. Pylon's thoughtfulness comes through in other areas, too, such as the helpful markings on the PCB. For example, little arrows guide you to where to put switches/stabs for the myriad variations (eg. 1.5u ctrl vs 1.25 ctrl, or 6.25u spacebar vs 7u spacebar), which makes the installation process less error-prone.

JLCPCB is/was sold out of the MCU, so I had to buy the MCU separately on Aliexpress and drag-solder it in myself. To others who are new to drag-soldering MCUs like I was, my advice is to make sure you have good magnification! I wrecked my first MCU because I thought I could adequately see what I was doing, but I was wrong. On my first attempt, I used a desk-clamp magnifier that's more than enough for soldering switches, diodes etc. But the MCU is so tiny that it was still pretty hard to line up the pins correctly and spot soldering errors. After reworking the soldering job too many times, I ended up bending the pins all over the place and eventually snapping one off. So I had to order another MCU, and this time I also bought a better magnifier. Nothing fancy - just this $30 one (https://www.jaycar.com.au/led-headband-magnifier/p/QM3511). It only provides slightly more magnification than what I already had, but that slight increase made all the difference. Lining up the second MCU was a breeze, and I immediately realised how limited my visibility had been the first time. When you can properly see what you're doing, drag-soldering is pretty easy, with the flux doing most of the work for you. Remember to use a very light touch lest you bend the pins.

I'm finding the layout to be great. As I mentioned, I'm using 1.25u keys for the nav cluster trio, which I've mapped to HOME, END, and DEL. Not only do the 1.25u keys fit very well aesthetically in this area, but the increased size makes them very comfortable to hit with your pinky. I use DEL a lot, and using a 1.25u version feels like this is how big it should always have been. The little 0.25u gap around the arrow keys is excellent too. I was initially sceptical whether such a small gap would isolate the arrow keys sufficiently (compared to a 100% style keyboard where the arrows live in their own separate spot), but I'm finding the 0.25u gap to be perfectly adequate. My fingers gravitate to and locate the arrows effortlessly, even though my muscle memory has never experienced this exact layout before.

Thanks again Pylon for this awesome workhorse of a keyboard, and I hope your arm heals quickly!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: highdocc on Thu, 09 December 2021, 07:08:05
this looks so good :D
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: menuhin on Fri, 10 December 2021, 05:19:20
Thanks Volny for taking the plunge! Let me know how it goes!

Various updates:
More
  • I received a prototype case from SuNPe, in raw unfinished aluminum. I still haven't sent out the PCB or plate order though as I'm wrapping up a few things on the design, so I'm still at least 2 weeks out on those parts. I unfortunately have various issues with the quality of this prototype (the top is about 0.5mm longer than the bottom despite matching in CAD, and although raw aluminum is quite soft and easily scratched, the number of scratches overall is pretty concerning in terms of how they might be handling the cases, which would not be acceptable in a group buy). I was hoping to offer a raw aluminum option, but seeing how scuffed it is that is unlikely without some major waivers/disclaimers.
  • As mentioned, still wrapping up design on the metal version's PCB, plate, and daughterboard. The daughterboard is compatible with the C3 Universal Daughterboard (same footprint, pinouts, etc.), though I'm making some minor tweaks to try to get better EMI performance (in case I need to run this through FCC or CE emissions testing).

Pics of the case:

(Attachment Link)

I'll be ordering a second prototype with a standard matte bead-blasted finish with anodization after I build this one up and get some time on it. I'm debating trying to laser etch the map of Boston on the back of the metal one - this would be really nice, but I'm pretty worried about whether it'll come out well, and it would add cost and be another item to QC. I've seen some pretty good quality laser marks on other items I own (e.g. my Motu M2 audio interface's items are all lasered, and the quality is excellent), but am not sure how to replicate it.

Is this prototype different from the original open-sourced design? Or has the open-sourced design also be updated?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Crabby on Fri, 10 December 2021, 14:19:07
I've had my PCB for over a year (lol) but due to real life issues I have not had a chance to put it together. Now I have everything, except for a few things (stabs/caps) I'm still waiting for in the mail. When I put it together I'll be sure to leave a testimonial here. Amazing project, can't wait to have it as my new daily driver.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: yukitoki on Tue, 21 December 2021, 17:23:13
Thank you Volny just got the pcb today ^^  :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: lllchevy350lll on Wed, 22 December 2021, 12:34:38
Unfortunately the PCBs and prototype will likely be delayed as I fractured my right arm in a bike crash. I'm going to see how well I can solder with my left hand, but it may be delayed several weeks until things heal up.

Sorry to hear that. Hope you get better soon! Happy holidays and happy new year from all us Boston lovers!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 25 December 2021, 14:49:58
Thanks for the support everyone! My right arm is healing well, though I still have to wear a sling for at least a few more weeks.

Some minor updates:
* The PCB design for the metal version is done. I'm doing some unrelated work on my force curve meter's PCB, and will send the PCB prototype order out once that's done. Soldering the MCU might be tricky with the current state of my right arm, but I'll give it a shot.
* The vendor that is interested in running the 3D printed version is currently unfortunately inundated with work right now, and I won't have an update from them until mid-late January
* Volny discovered an error in the QMK files where the 1u + and 1u = buttons were reversed. This will only affect you if you aren't using 2u numpad +. I'm planning on taking a look at and fixing this later this weekend.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: iamtragic on Sun, 26 December 2021, 21:40:56
Looking forward to the completed metal version. I hope that your arm recovers rapidly.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: JucheCatgirlTS on Fri, 31 December 2021, 22:27:58
I really like the new metal case design, can't wait! I have a couple nice aluminum TKLs now but the Boston is still my everyday board at my home PC. I just swapped the U4Ts out for Cherry MX Blacks, here's a quick video to ring in the new year:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: schrobie on Sun, 02 January 2022, 11:12:52
Wow, this thing is big. Has the price been hinted at anywhere? I love that you released the 3d printer files!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Micktrinus on Sun, 09 January 2022, 13:48:35
Full size custom boards seem to be hard to come by...I am really interested in this project
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 15 January 2022, 16:38:12
After many delays, PCBs for the plate have finally been ordered for the updated metal version prototype  - I should be receiving them in 2 weeks. My right arm is well enough at this point that I shouldn't have issues soldering the proto - thanks for the support everyone!

I really like the new metal case design, can't wait! I have a couple nice aluminum TKLs now but the Boston is still my everyday board at my home PC. I just swapped the U4Ts out for Cherry MX Blacks, here's a quick video to ring in the new year:

Oh nice! Thanks for doing the sound test. I like the various flag color schemes you got going.

Wow, this thing is big. Has the price been hinted at anywhere? I love that you released the 3d printer files!

Unfortunately for the metal one it's probably going to be on the higher end as it's a huge board. Probably at least $400, but I don't have final numbers yet - I still need to choose a final manufacturers and get more quotes for this. SuNPe for the proto was relatively cheap, but I'm somewhat concerned about the quality from them given how scratched the proto was and from other reports about them (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=106462.msg2907829#msg2907829). I have quotes from Dadesin, but their quote was pretty high (almost $200 higher than SuNPe in quantity 30), and with the current 25% tariffs it would be quite tough to do this for under $600 with them. However, their quality is pretty good (and a lot of keyboard GBs are run through them).

I should have better numbers once I test the prototype and get more up-to-date quotes, and work things out with the vendor.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: whizzard on Wed, 19 January 2022, 00:23:05
Pylon... amazing work so far... can't tell you how excited I am for this project!  Keep up the great work and good luck.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: copper4eva on Sun, 23 January 2022, 09:08:12
Looks awesome. Hope we get a group buy. Don't get a lot of custom boards bigger than full size. So this is pretty unique for custom MX boards.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Epsilon Plus on Wed, 26 January 2022, 16:47:08
Really excited to see this progress - I've gotten some new job duties where having a dedicated row of macro keys that don't require me to shift my hands too much would be really fab.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: nickyteddy on Mon, 31 January 2022, 05:32:10
I cannot wait to see how this project progresses in the future. :thumb: I cannot verbalise how excited I am for a keyboard of this size in a nice metal case to be realised someday.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: rice97 on Sun, 13 February 2022, 01:09:56
I want this so badly my god.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Sun, 13 February 2022, 20:45:47
Hey everyone - the proto is built and working. Some dusty photos:
[attachimg=1]
[attachimg=2]
[attachimg=3]
[attachimg=4]
[attachimg=5]
[attachimg=6]
[attachimg=7]

I maybe do a sound test later this week. The switches were lubed a bit inconsistently though so I may do more work on it, but it's enough to evaluate the proto.

 Moving forward, I need to:

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: CoyoteMegalo on Mon, 14 February 2022, 01:09:47
Moving forward, I need to:
  • Get a second case proto with a sandblasted, anodized case. I also plan on fixing some minor issues on the 2nd proto (the front bumpon pocket is a little too small for instance). This may be with a different manufacturer (I used SuNPe for the proto).
  • Figure out FCC/CE EMI testing and get some quotes with some testing labs. I wrote up about EMI testing laws and regulations (and the likely dubious legal status of most custom mechanical keyboards) on Keebtalk (https://www.keebtalk.com/t/your-custom-keyboard-is-probably-illegal-a-long-post-on-radio-interference-testing-regulations-and-keyboards/16104). I would like to comply with those laws and regulations and actually do the interference testing. This adds time, complexity, and quite a bit of cost, and imposes a bunch of constraints (e.g. I might have to sell this with a fixed layout plate to avoid testing every layout configuration, which would add a lot of testing costs, and have open-source universal plate files published online that people would have to get cut themselves if they want to). This may also cause issues with international availability - the US, EU, and Canada have separate EMI testing regulations and require different tests to legally sell keebs in their jurisdictions, and it likely won't make financial sense to get approval with every jurisdiction (e.g. I received a $3000 quote for CE testing for Europe, and I'm not particularly confident I can make that $3000 back in EU sales). It may end up being US restricted if I only pay for FCC testing (which is still likely $2000+), and you'll have to find a 3rd-party proxy/forwarder or something if you're trying to get this from abroad (e.g. I can't legally sell directly in Europe without CE testing). If these constraints are too problematic (or if the testing ends up simply being too expensive), I am considering just open-sourcing the files metal version and writing up an ordering guide just like the 3D printed version, which would probably preclude a group buy or other sale.
  • Compile a final bill of materials, and figure out pricing. 
  • Work things out with a vendor (there's been some tentative talks with a vendor but nothing's concrete yet).
  • There's a chance I run this in-stock, though this is still TBD.

Hey, thanks a lot for news!
So, you will not sell this badboy in EU? Maybe via an european proxy?
This CE testing is very expensive and I understand you'll follow the rules ;)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: geauxflying on Tue, 15 February 2022, 09:49:30
Good morning, gents. I've been out for a while, and wanted to get back in and check out progress on the aluminum one - it looks good Pylon, I'm looking forward to it. In the meantime, I was thinking about ordering 5 PCBs to make a few more of the 3-D printed version as gifts for folks.

I have a question about ordering - it looks like the MCU is what determines how much memory is available for things like macros. I'm running out of memory for macros on my board, so I'm curious if there's a compatible MCU with substantially more memory than the ones listed? A couple of the compatible MCUs say 128x8 Kbytes, I'm not actually sure if this is an indication that it will be 1,024 kb or not because the datasheets just say "64 to 128 Kbytes of Flash memory, 16 Kbytes of SRAM with HW parity". For example, look at this MCU, it says 128x8 on the main page, but the product datasheet says "64-128" so I'm not sure what I'd be getting: https://www.digikey.com/en/products/detail/stmicroelectronics/STM32F072CBT7/5308070.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Vardys on Tue, 15 February 2022, 12:47:24
Even unfinished, love that metal board! Created this account for this project, looking forward to what come of it. Take as long as you need!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Jaygles on Sat, 19 February 2022, 11:53:42
Even unfinished, love that metal board! Created this account for this project, looking forward to what come of it. Take as long as you need!

Same here. Can't wait to see the anodized version
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: KeeBnnuy on Sat, 19 February 2022, 20:24:46
Is a release still coming for this keyboard? I have a friend who wants me to build him a mech keyboard and that was his first choice in terms of layout!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Dreadnou(h)gt on Mon, 21 February 2022, 14:00:11
I need that Board...
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: IneffableCrab on Tue, 01 March 2022, 17:08:53
Oh my goodness, that aluminum prototype looks magnificent.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: runnez on Tue, 08 March 2022, 06:13:56
Hey everyone - the proto is built and working. Some dusty photos:
(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)
(Attachment Link)

I maybe do a sound test later this week. The switches were lubed a bit inconsistently though so I may do more work on it, but it's enough to evaluate the proto.

 Moving forward, I need to:
  • Get a second case proto with a sandblasted, anodized case. I also plan on fixing some minor issues on the 2nd proto (the front bumpon pocket is a little too small for instance). This may be with a different manufacturer (I used SuNPe for the proto).
  • Figure out FCC/CE EMI testing and get some quotes with some testing labs. I wrote up about EMI testing laws and regulations (and the likely dubious legal status of most custom mechanical keyboards) on Keebtalk (https://www.keebtalk.com/t/your-custom-keyboard-is-probably-illegal-a-long-post-on-radio-interference-testing-regulations-and-keyboards/16104). I would like to comply with those laws and regulations and actually do the interference testing. This adds time, complexity, and quite a bit of cost, and imposes a bunch of constraints (e.g. I might have to sell this with a fixed layout plate to avoid testing every layout configuration, which would add a lot of testing costs, and have open-source universal plate files published online that people would have to get cut themselves if they want to). This may also cause issues with international availability - the US, EU, and Canada have separate EMI testing regulations and require different tests to legally sell keebs in their jurisdictions, and it likely won't make financial sense to get approval with every jurisdiction (e.g. I received a $3000 quote for CE testing for Europe, and I'm not particularly confident I can make that $3000 back in EU sales). It may end up being US restricted if I only pay for FCC testing (which is still likely $2000+), and you'll have to find a 3rd-party proxy/forwarder or something if you're trying to get this from abroad (e.g. I can't legally sell directly in Europe without CE testing). If these constraints are too problematic (or if the testing ends up simply being too expensive), I am considering just open-sourcing the files metal version and writing up an ordering guide just like the 3D printed version, which would probably preclude a group buy or other sale.
  • Compile a final bill of materials, and figure out pricing. 
  • Work things out with a vendor (there's been some tentative talks with a vendor but nothing's concrete yet).
  • There's a chance I run this in-stock, though this is still TBD.
Ah damn it's a major shame if you cannot sell it in EU I own a Austin and use it as my main board I would love a bigger version

Sent from my ASUS_I005DA using Tapatalk

Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Robert.Lussier5 on Tue, 08 March 2022, 07:06:46
https://rndkbd.com/collections/keyboard-kits-cases/products/boston-keyboard-kit?variant=42579256541418
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: TheNeonKnight on Wed, 09 March 2022, 16:46:43
I bought the 3d print one, but I want the aluminum too. Too cool
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: hvontres on Fri, 18 March 2022, 02:11:01
Finished my second prototype today:
[attachimg=1]
124 ligtht blue box switches ( this one is my home board, so clicky is not a problem)

Both of my boards:
[attachimg=2]
The top one is my original build - Hako true switches and MT3 Suswatari, green backlight meant for the office (the blue F-keys and blanks are row one SA keys)
The bottom is my new home buld - Box light blue with MT3 /dev/TTT, amber backlight. The extra F-keys are from the extras kit.
Both feature my custom QMK buld that always asserts num lock, so I can re-use the key.

Edit: I had some issues with the keyboard resetting while plugged into a switch if I turn the yellow backlight up to high. Running from the PC is fine. I just checked, and with a 100 Ohm resistor, the green 1.8mm leds draw about 7.3 mA while the yellow draw about 11.3mA. So over 124 leds, that gives a draw of about 900 mA for green instead of 1400 mA for Yellow. So if you are on the fence between the two colors, I would go with green.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: hvontres on Sat, 19 March 2022, 00:18:24
Also, if anyone is curious, I build my second board with Mil-Max 0305 Sockets. Worked really well. Kind of wish I had done that on my first one as well. Maybe if I ever rebuild it :) I got 270 sockets and that just about covers one board.
[attachimg=1]
Front side. Excuse my mess of a bench (It's a little better now)
[attachimg=2]
Cool view down the backside.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now with Vial)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 19 March 2022, 14:43:18
Hi all - due to complication around EMI regulations, personal circumstances (I'm not sure if I have the capacity to run a GB in the near future), and the fact that this has been in IC for 22 months and I don't want to let it drag on further, I decided to open-source the files for the metal version instead of running a group buy, produced manufacturing drawings, and wrote up a draft ordering guide (similar to the 3D printed version). I apologize to everyone that has been waiting so long, but I hope you will be able to use these files to order one for yourself. The license also permits 3rd-party group buys without any royalties. As with the 3D-printed version, the files are provided as-is. Order parts at your own risk.
https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/tree/master/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/Metal%20version

I still need to write up assembly instructions (I will need to disassemble my proto and rebuild it to do so), but it should be fairly straightforward to build (as it's a traditional top mount keyboard). The only complications are around the daughterboard holder and pressing-in and soldering the M2 PEM nuts for that.

For the 3D-printed version, RNDKBD has run a GB (due late March), and will run future ones. I am not directly involved in this group buy, though I have been talking with Andy quite a bit and answering questions and such.
https://rndkbd.com/collections/keyboard-kits-cases/products/boston-keyboard-kit?variant=42579256541418
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: Jaygles on Sun, 20 March 2022, 22:45:39
Damn understood. Thanks for open sourcing it. I'm about to learn a lot about keyboards lol
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: thienhaor on Sun, 20 March 2022, 23:08:49
Thank you for all your hard work, sad that the GB didn't make it but the keyboard still lives on! Is there any chance that we can support you as a designer other than GB? Seriously the whole Github link is a gold mine and you even plan to do a full assembly video too! Big UPS
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: Pylon on Mon, 21 March 2022, 08:36:24
Thank you for all your hard work, sad that the GB didn't make it but the keyboard still lives on! Is there any chance that we can support you as a designer other than GB? Seriously the whole Github link is a gold mine and you even plan to do a full assembly video too! Big UPS

Thanks! At the moment no, but I appreciate the sentiment, and if you do decide to build a Boston please post photos of it as I enjoy seeing what people do with the files. I'm also still working on a force curve meter kit (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=115453.0), though there's lots and lots of software work that still needs to be done.

Also it'll probably be a written assembly guide, not a video  - I'm not good at making videos so an assembly video is unlikely (I actually attempted to do a fairly janky build stream when I received the proto but was having a lot of problems with Twitch).
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: hvontres on Sun, 27 March 2022, 00:52:06
Pylon, thank you again for a most awesome input device :) I was wondering if there is any interest in a southpaw version (we could call it southie :) ) I did a quick mockup in KLE:
[attachimg=1]
I am just getting back into KiCad and started playing with the Acheron libs today. I figure there is two possible routes we could go with something like this:

1) design a whole new PCB, probably best to do the daughterboard version and modify the 3d printed case to mount the daughter board
2) look at splitting the PCB into three sections (the 65% center seciton, numpad and dual F-keys). This would allow us to only have one set of boards and rearrange them to suit. At this point, it is just an idea floating in my head and I would probably need to sit down and do some scale layouts to see how feasible this second idea really is.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: lush_bunny on Mon, 28 March 2022, 00:14:53
Pylon, thank you again for a most awesome input device :) I was wondering if there is any interest in a southpaw version (we could call it southie :) ) I did a quick mockup in KLE:
(Attachment Link)
I am just getting back into KiCad and started playing with the Acheron libs today. I figure there is two possible routes we could go with something like this:

1) design a whole new PCB, probably best to do the daughterboard version and modify the 3d printed case to mount the daughter board
2) look at splitting the PCB into three sections (the 65% center seciton, numpad and dual F-keys). This would allow us to only have one set of boards and rearrange them to suit. At this point, it is just an idea floating in my head and I would probably need to sit down and do some scale layouts to see how feasible this second idea really is.

Southpaw would be nice. Color me interested. Though I'm not sure if this is the right place to bring this up. Maybe ping Pylon in Discord?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: whizzard on Sat, 02 April 2022, 18:41:35
Thanks, Pylon, for your honesty and generosity.  Sometimes it can be difficult to realize you don't have the time to finish a project, and releasing the plans and R&D free of charge is a great act of selflessness.

Open-sourcing all this planning and hard work is a gift to the keyboard world.  I would have loved to buy this kit, but getting one custom machined on my own is a route I have yet to go in my keyboard building. Many thanks for all you have done so far and to everyone who has found and followed this awesome project. 

Can't wait to see where this can go in the future with those of us who are interested in creating a Boston of our own.  And to the over 100 percent size keyboard fans among us, keep it up!
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: Pylon on Wed, 11 May 2022, 08:47:30
Hi all - some various updates:

itsFirewire did a long build stream on Twitch (https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1480626736) last night for the 3D-printed GB RNDKBD ran recently (https://rndkbd.com/collections/keyboard-kits-cases/products/boston-keyboard-kit). RNDKBD will tentatively be doing a round two around late-May or early-June. Note I'm not formally running or involved in RNDKBD's group buy (it's based off the open source files) but have been communicating with Andy @ RNDKBD quite a bit.

I'm doing another PCB revision (V0.7J) for the 3D printed version to add some holes to the PCB so that the screws that hold the key separators to the plate can be accessed from the back once the PCB is soldered. Right now those screws are inaccessible once the PCB is in place, so the key separators can't be adjusted after switches are soldered onto the PCB (which makes aligning them before soldering critical). I'm also looking into a way to ground the plate and screws on the top side (they currently are not grounded, though you can solder a wire between the PCB and plate if you wish to ground them). Both of these changes requires moving several components, and will require another round of prototyping. I'm not sure if this revision will be ready and prototyped in time for RNDKBD's R2.

I have a friend who's trying to build a 3D-printed one with countersunk (flush) screws on the top instead of button head. If it works well I'll update the files to make that an option, as it would be less obtrusive than the current button head screws.

The assembly guide for the metal version (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/blob/master/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/Metal%20version/Assembly-guide.md) is slowly coming along, but I still need to add pictures (I'm rebuilding my current prototype and desoldering is going slowly, but I'll be able to photograph it when it's getting rebuilt).

The Vial firmware (https://github.com/bluepylons/Boston/blob/master/Boston%20-%20Current%20design/boston_vial.bin) has been updated to use Vial V0.5.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: lush_bunny on Wed, 11 May 2022, 09:05:59
Pylon is so based. Thank you.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: atl22033 on Tue, 24 May 2022, 08:35:08
So for the metal case do you think i would be able to have it cnced in poly instead of metal?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: Pylon on Fri, 27 May 2022, 02:08:02
I don't see why not, though you probably want to ask your manufacturer to install brass threaded inserts into the polycarbonate instead of tapping it, as tapped holes in plastic aren't super durable.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: Pylon on Sat, 28 May 2022, 03:33:46
RNDKBD (https://rndkbd.com/) announced that they will be starting Round 2 of their group buy for 3D-printed Bostons on Friday June 3rd. This will likely use the new PCB revision V0.7J, which allows for access to the key separator screws from the back once the PCB is soldered in place.

I just received protos for V0.7J and everything appears to be working fine so far (shorting the keys with a pair of tweezers), though I haven't built up a full keyboard (with switches and all) for that new PCB yet as I'm waiting on switches and stabs for a new build.

(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/847113872661413939/979963706463105084/PXL_20220528_042526714.NIGHT.jpg)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: Dreadnou(h)gt on Wed, 01 June 2022, 16:18:15
Thank you so much for that awesome Board!

(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/913298667681775636/981638504574484540/20220601_211910.jpg)
(https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/913298667681775636/981638505023299704/20220601_211958.jpg)
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: Pylon on Thu, 02 June 2022, 07:47:56
Looking good!

Reminder that RNDKBD's Round 2 (https://rndkbd.com/) for the 3D-printed version will start tomorrow (June 3rd) at 9AM Mountain Time.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: vicechief on Mon, 20 June 2022, 13:45:04
Pylon, I just want to say thanks for designing and making this most excellent battleship. I bought a green PCB kit from you a few years ago and recently mostly-assembled it. I really enjoy using it and it's really opened my eyes to what I like and don't like about layouts in general.

Eventually, I'm going to make my own.

Also VIAL is a revelation.

Cheers.

[attach=1]
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: hvontres on Fri, 24 June 2022, 02:24:15
Nice board. Are those SA keys? Extra bonus for the "door" and "flare" keys :) I am really glad I found this and I ended up with two (one for the office and one for home :) )
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: Dreadnou(h)gt on Tue, 16 August 2022, 09:19:02
Hello, if someone near Germany is interested in a PCB for the Alu Version of the Board, hit me up Dreadnouhgt#6001 on Discord. I ordered some and have 3 in Spare now. I sell those for 70 bucks + shipping. They include everything like LED,s Daughterboard, JST Connectors etc. to get the board to work.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: ReDsNoTDeAd on Mon, 19 September 2022, 04:14:02
Hi All,

Now that the group buy rush is over, I plan on carrying the 3D-printed Boston (with 0.7J PCBs) as an in-stock item in my store. Expect about a week lead time as these are printed to order. Big thanks to Pylon for all his hard work + open sourcing this project.

https://rndkbd.com/products/boston-keyboard-kit
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: MMJ1999 on Mon, 26 September 2022, 20:10:21
wow :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: RPFNYC on Sun, 23 October 2022, 04:10:12
Hi All,

Now that the group buy rush is over, I plan on carrying the 3D-printed Boston (with 0.7J PCBs) as an in-stock item in my store. Expect about a week lead time as these are printed to order. Big thanks to Pylon for all his hard work + open sourcing this project.

https://rndkbd.com/products/boston-keyboard-kit

Can the keyboard be ordered with rgb lighting and hot swap connectors on the pcb board ?
I would like this order this keyboard but I am trying to find out if it comes with all the things I like most about keyboards besides the layout (which I love).

Does the keyboard come fully assembled when ordering from your store ?
I don't want to solder, I'm horrible at it.  I don't mind regular hand assembly tho.

thanks
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: Technofrikus on Wed, 28 December 2022, 09:05:49
I made a printable version of the Metal Case. Thanks a lot Pylon for opensourcing everything!
You need a printer that can print a 405mm object.

Details and files available here:
https://github.com/Technofrikus/Boston-Case


[attach=1]

[attach=2]

[attach=3]
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: CaesarAZealad on Wed, 28 December 2022, 12:17:58
Now that's fecking sick! Good job man.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: Epsilon Plus on Sun, 23 April 2023, 17:41:38
So I've been following this thread/project for a while and am still... really desiring a metal one of these. Would there be any interest in a few people getting together to have some metal ones CNCed, to get a lower price, rather than me shelling out for a one-off? I've bought from group buys before but I've never organized anything, I dunno if I have the organization/spare time to do so right now.

This is probably a niche enough board that doing an actual GB for a metal version of it would probably fail to meet a reasonable minimum, right?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: bkrownd on Sun, 23 April 2023, 20:38:04
an experienced and well resourced vendor would have to take it on, probably big $$$.

that looks excellent technofrikus
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: iamtragic on Sun, 23 April 2023, 23:37:16
https://www.reddit.com/r/mechmarket/comments/10z5ivm/ic_rndkbd_metal_boston_120_keyboard/

Worthwhile checking in here and seeing if the GB ever happened / if it's yet to happen.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (now open-source - no official GB planned any more)
Post by: ReDsNoTDeAd on Wed, 21 June 2023, 23:32:46
https://www.reddit.com/r/mechmarket/comments/10z5ivm/ic_rndkbd_metal_boston_120_keyboard/

Worthwhile checking in here and seeing if the GB ever happened / if it's yet to happen.

(https://i.imgur.com/f4h93Ke.png)

https://rndkbd.com/collections/boston-120-group-buy/products/gb-boston-120-compact-keyboard-kit

Oh it's happening. Opens tomorrow (June 22) at 2 PM EST
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (open-source; RNDKBD is doing a metal GB)
Post by: bkrownd on Thu, 22 June 2023, 02:26:53

Ooof, over the last year I got back into mechanical clocks and mechanical (haha) guitars.  The funding has gone elsewhere.  Now I don't think I can fund such an endgame board anymore. 
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (open-source; RNDKBD is doing a metal GB)
Post by: sanger_r on Thu, 22 June 2023, 09:28:14
Any chance we can just buy the case or is it kits only?
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (open-source; RNDKBD is doing a metal GB)
Post by: ReDsNoTDeAd on Fri, 23 June 2023, 14:27:51
Any chance we can just buy the case or is it kits only?

Reach out to me at andy@rndkbd.com and I can make that happen.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (open-source; RNDKBD is doing a metal GB)
Post by: ReDsNoTDeAd on Fri, 30 June 2023, 15:32:53
Last day for the Alu Boston: https://rndkbd.com/products/gb-boston-120-compact-keyboard-kit
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (open-source; RNDKBD is doing a metal GB)
Post by: svenge on Fri, 28 July 2023, 09:34:26
Last day for the Alu Boston: https://rndkbd.com/products/gb-boston-120-compact-keyboard-kit

Oops I missed this one.  That's okay... I just started working on building my 3d printed version.  Starting with a nice paint job :)

To whoever bought into the alu version (and hek, the 3d print too), please share pics of your builds, I think this is one of the most beautiful boards out there.
Title: Re: [IC] Boston, a compact 120% (open-source; RNDKBD is doing a metal GB)
Post by: svenge on Fri, 08 September 2023, 17:47:17
And here's some scuffed pics of my 3d printed boston120 - can you tell what color the original plastic was?   :cool:

It's really hard to capture the colorshift paint in a single image.  It looks so cool in the right light.

[attach=1][attach=2][attach=3][attach=4]