Author Topic: the audiophile effect (?)  (Read 12592 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SuffixTreeMonkey

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 10
the audiophile effect (?)
« on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 12:59:28 »
Here's a controversial topic for you:

I've recently bought a G80-3000, so I'm "one of you guys" (but still a big newb), and I like the keyboard a lot, but I'm wondering how come this forum is (subjectively) often rooting for the Filcos and Topres.

I mean, besides things like different key switches, NKRO, and the fact that some keyboards aren't available on some continents, is there really a difference between say the Filcos (which costs ~90£ from thekeyboardco) and some of the cheaper keyboards? (I've got mine for 60Euro, which is a bargain compared to the Filco price).

The reason I called the thread "the audiophile effect" is because that community is known for buying overpriced tech with little to no measurable gain in sound quality. Since the audiophiles themselves would never admit they are unable to hear the difference, I doubt I'd get that answer here.

Looking forward to all the answers! And I'm sorry if I offended your amazing, expensive keyboard. :-)

Offline noodles256

  • Posts: 1980
  • le legendary
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #1 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 13:04:35 »
I bought ath-m50 and a $25 fios amp to a total of $150

My other option was dr. dre monsters for $300.

ATH-M50s blow it out of the water as well

I don't think it is that overpriced.
AF | Ducky YOTD |

Offline Variable

  • Posts: 40
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #2 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 13:08:07 »
I have no doubt that there is an element of a 'new tech high', where the newest gear you get gets you so excited that you're sure it blows everything else away.

but I also have no doubt that this leo I'm typing on is much nicer than the blackwidow I had ten minutes ago. and that the grado headphones I'm planning to get in a few weeks will be a step up from the base model I have right now.

so I think it's a little of both. I also think people who spend hours on forums discussing this stuff are the most likely to detect subtle differences and have those differences matter to them.

but then I ALSO think people who spend hours on these forums are going to look the hardest for differences in higher level stuff and arguably find it even when it isn't there

Offline hcry4

  • HHKB Hoarder
  • Posts: 403
  • Location: SF, CA
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #3 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 13:09:09 »
The increase in perceivable quality gains tapers off very quickly with a lot of products. I just cannot go back to **** quality keyboards, earphones/headphones, etc...

Offline MrSneis

  • Posts: 126
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #4 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 13:09:33 »
I'd say it's an elitist attitude though, I am new too.  From my experience Filcos are not god's gift to keyboards or anything, they have issues too.

BTW I've been a head-fi'er since around 2004.
Filco Tenkeyless Brown | Filco Tenkeyless-2 Blue | Leopold Tenkeyless Blue

Offline SuffixTreeMonkey

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 10
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #5 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 13:23:00 »
Quote
3. High quality and/or Feature Laden Gaming Keyboards - $100 - $200- Das, Filco, and LED keyboards like the Deck/Razer/Xarmor.


Ya, I've read that. And I understand diminishing returns between 3 and 4. The difference between 2 and 3 is more interesting to me. I'm still wondering what "high quality and/or feature laden" means (besides NKRO). People here often care a lot about the shape and material of the keys, etchings and/or the "sturdiness" of the keyboard, but are those desires purely esthetic or has anyone measured any effect on their typing speed, comfort or gaming skill?

Offline Peter

  • Posts: 86
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #6 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 13:35:38 »
Quote from: SuffixTreeMonkey;326845
I've recently bought a G80-3000, so I'm "one of you guys" (but still a big newb), and I like the keyboard a lot, but I'm wondering how come this forum is (subjectively) often rooting for the Filcos and Topres.

On my keyboard, Steelseries 6gv2, the Cherry blacks are mounted on a 1.5mm steel-plate -
On your g80-3000 they aren't .
Not only does it change how the switches feel, it also increases costs,
including shipping !!
I'm not saying that plate-mounted switches are 'better', they just feel different to PCB mounted switches .
What you prefer is a subjective matter so what feels best to you IS best !
« Last Edit: Fri, 08 April 2011, 13:43:27 by Peter »

Offline Shuki

  • Posts: 252
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #7 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 13:36:43 »
It's all subjective. Some people prefer crisp base and great soundstage, whereas others love heavy base sacrificing midtones somewhat. It's all down to what you prefer.

I like my Topre, but the price is pretty outrageous and I can see why people wouldn't sink that much cash into one.

Offline ironman31

  • Posts: 834
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #8 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 13:36:58 »
Quote from: ripster;326861
I put this in the "Geekhack Mechanical Keyboard Guide".

NORMALLY within these pricepoints there are little differences.


Ducky is the obvious exception.  They Sucky.


tell me about it, I'm in the process of returning my G2
Keyboards:
IBM Model M Space Saving Keyboard (Used), HHKB Pro 2 (White, Lettered), Realforce 87U all-45g in White, Filco Majestouch 2 TKL with Cherry MX Browns, Model F PC/ATNoppoo Choc Mini (MX Browns), Model F XT, IBM Model M 1397735 (bought NIB), (2) Siig Minitouch (GHSS) one with XM, one with complicated ALPs (modded),2 Dell AT101W, Cherry G80-11900HRMUS (modded with MX browns)



Pointing Devices:
Logitech G500, Evoluent VerticalMouse 3, Logitech G5, CST 2545W, Microsoft IntelliMouse Trackball, Logitech M570, Logitech MX revolution


Offline didjamatic

  • Posts: 1352
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #9 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 13:39:57 »
Using a HHKB Lite is fun and a great keyboard for someone wanting to try the layout, but stepping up to the HHKB Pro you get a completely different typing experience that is an upgrade in every area from tactility to durability to build quality to materials.  This is opinion but largely based on fact.

The "Audiophile effect" would be someone upgrading from a HHKB Pro $300 keyboard to the HHKB HP $4000 keyboard and writing page after page about how the sound characteristics and tactility are so improved they can taste almonds while using it... but are mostly trying to justify what they just spent and limit their buyer's remorse.

Cherry G80-3000's have great switches but not quite up to the build quality of Filcos.  Key caps aside, Filcos are very well made so you're getting something substantial for that extra cash.  If that's important to you then it's worth it.  If not, it probably isn't but if you've joined a keyboard forum it might be important to you.

I don't think viewing Filco or similar keyboards as superior to some others is an elitist, narrow minded or inaccurate point of view.  They really are a better keyboard than most.
IBM F :: IBM M :: Northgate :: Cherry G80 :: Realforce :: DAS 4

Offline dracaXL

  • Posts: 80
    • http://www.technickal.org
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #10 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 13:56:16 »
To utilise the audiophile analogy in the realm of the Geekhackers' keyboard obsession isn't perhaps wholly appropriate, in that the audiophile effect depends on the fallibility of the auditory sensory system (i.e. the aural placebo effect) and generally the inability to tangibly measure changes in system performance without a) a way of recording the frequency response of a set-up and b) a way to double-blind test the system. These latter requirements mean that most audiophiles can't be bothered to invest the time and effort that goes into fairly comparing their gear, hence allowing buyer's remorse to justify retarded purchases (like four thousand dollar foil shielded cables of IQ-attenuation).

With keyboards you've got a far more tangible and concrete way of comparing performance with A/B tests, and the sensory facet of touch is not so easily fooled; generally, something feels better or it doesn't. Your hands hurt whilst typing on it, or they don't. You suffer RSI symptoms on one layout, or you don't on another. Also, actuation force etc are metrics that are immediately measurable using something as simple as placing a few nickels on the keycap - not as difficult to do as attempting to record and compare FR, for example.
Filco Majestouch Linear (i.e. MX Blacks) | Noppoo Choc Mini (MX Browns) | TVS Gold Bharat (MX Blue) | VorTex KBC Poker* (MX Red)

Intel Core i7-2600k | Gainward GTX 580 GOOD | 8GB XMS3 DDR3 RAM | Gigabyte P67-UD4 | Asus Xonar Essence ST | NZXT Phantom | KRK RP5 G2 w. Wharfedale SW150

*pre-ordered

Offline keyb_gr

  • Posts: 1384
  • Location: Germany
  • Cherrified user
    • My keyboard page (German)
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #11 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 14:06:13 »
Quote from: SuffixTreeMonkey;326845
I've recently bought a G80-3000, so I'm "one of you guys" (but still a big newb), and I like the keyboard a lot, but I'm wondering how come this forum is (subjectively) often rooting for the Filcos and Topres.
Filcos were, for quite a while, the least expensive new mechanicals with Cherry switches (plate-mounted at that) and no major flaws available in the US. Plus, you could get them in tenkeyless versions and with NKRO.

G80-3000? Pretty much restricted to Europe, save for some special order types. Minimal construction with PCB-mounted switches that doesn't feel all that solid - in return, it's very service-friendly. Keycaps on light grey samples quite thin and flimsy-sounding, but lasered lettering holds up pretty well.
Scorpius M10? Lousy reliability, very common soldering problems.
Razer Blackwidow? Quickly fading lettering and other reliability issues, glossy surface. Lettering seems to have been reworked now.
Adesso? Some lettering problems, too, from what I remember...
Das? Solid board, normal pricing, glossy surface is not for everyone.
Steelseries 6Gv2/7G? Only comes with MX blacks, big L-shaped Enter.

Topres are a different story altogether. The keyswitch technology isn't used anywhere else (except in even more expensive gear), plus build quality is on a high level (e.g. dye-sub'd PBT keys), and they're made in Japan.

(The first two items also apply to Unicomp, but pricing and build quality both are lower, plus they don't seem to be making a lot of money.)

Generally, in mechanical keyboards, you're still pretty much getting what you pay for. Compare that to fancy gaming 'domes.
Quote
The reason I called the thread "the audiophile effect" is because that community is known for buying overpriced tech with little to no measurable gain in sound quality.
Or even loss, for that matter. You can spend arbitrary amounts of money on components with pedestrian performance, or in places where it makes no difference.

I don't really see that happening with keyboards though. Their real-life performance can be evaluated a little more easily than audio quality. Plus, audiophiles would be a lot less misinformed if subjectivism hadn't gradually taken over in the 1980s. (Which had a lot to do with making money.) Thankfully we have the interwebs these days.
Hardware in signatures clutters Google search results. There should be a field in the profile for that (again).

This message was probably typed on a vintage G80-3000 with blues. Double-shots, baby. :D

Offline digitalleftovers

  • Posts: 645
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #12 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 14:53:05 »
I think others have touched on this, but I will try to summarize it.

Although it may be difficult, people should not assume that better or best, always mean everything else is bad.  No one should ever put someone down for choosing a Das over a filco.  A topre isn't better than anything, its just unique and deserves to be recognized as such.  A filco isn't better because its more expensive, it just lacks cost effective distribution in most of the world.

The only place on geekhack that I believe the "Silver braided Cabling" audiophile analogy applies, is with the truely custom stuff.  If anyone on this forum even says "CNC aluminium cases are better than ANY other case, OMFG!!111," I will tell them where they can put their CNC aluminium.  Would I want one for the hell of it?  If I had that much money?  Sure.  But, if I had that much money, I'd probably also buy a silver cable so I could say "look guys, a silver cable!"  I would not put anyone down for not having either.

I have a ducky, and I'm not embarassed!
« Last Edit: Fri, 08 April 2011, 14:55:06 by digitalleftovers »
Keyboards:
Filco 104 MX Brown (Otaku) - FKBN104M/NPEK 黒い空
Ducky TKL MX Brown/Blue 80% (White) - 1087-F 白の空
KBC Poker MX Red with PBT Key Caps - PFCN6000


"Consumers use touch screens.  Producers use keyboards."

Offline celery

  • Posts: 47
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #13 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 15:40:33 »
You'll know that it's time to pull out the audiophile analogy when we start claiming that placing a tactile-resonance feedback enhanced sounding granite slab in the southeast corner of the room improves the typing experience.

It is OBVIOUSLY supposed to go on the west wall, orthogonal to the wrist line. DUH.

Offline digitalleftovers

  • Posts: 645
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #14 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 15:52:11 »
Quote from: celery;326938
You'll know that it's time to pull out the audiophile analogy when we start claiming that placing a tactile-resonance feedback enhanced sounding granite slab in the southeast corner of the room improves the typing experience.

It is OBVIOUSLY supposed to go on the west wall, orthogonal to the wrist line. DUH.


I prefer Tiger Iron. Lol.
Keyboards:
Filco 104 MX Brown (Otaku) - FKBN104M/NPEK 黒い空
Ducky TKL MX Brown/Blue 80% (White) - 1087-F 白の空
KBC Poker MX Red with PBT Key Caps - PFCN6000


"Consumers use touch screens.  Producers use keyboards."

Offline Mr. Perfect

  • Posts: 380
  • Location: United States
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #15 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 15:55:22 »
This reminds me of the Topre keychain world trip thread. Many people who have had the opportunity to try a Topre free of charge mention how it feels like a high quality rubber dome. People who own a Topre occasionally post about how they want to sexually molest their keyboard. Who's right?

Quote from: celery;326938
You'll know that it's time to pull out the audiophile analogy when we start claiming that placing a tactile-resonance feedback enhanced sounding granite slab in the southeast corner of the room improves the typing experience.

It is OBVIOUSLY supposed to go on the west wall, orthogonal to the wrist line. DUH.


And level with the top of the kneecap. Don't forget the vertical space!
Mr. Perfect - A name fraught with peril.

G80-8113HRBUS MX Clears, FC200R MX Clears, RK-9000v2 MX Blues.

Offline Chobopants

  • Posts: 590
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #16 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 16:13:13 »
Quote from: Mr. Perfect;326946
This reminds me of the Topre keychain world trip thread. Many people who have had the opportunity to try a Topre free of charge mention how it feels like a high quality rubber dome. People who own a Topre occasionally post about how they want to sexually molest their keyboard. Who's right?



And level with the top of the kneecap. Don't forget the vertical space!

I own one and freely admit that it's a high quality rubber dome. That said, everything about it is as solid as possible, even moreso than my Filco I'd say. The keycaps are easily the nicest I've ever felt (on a keyboard) and the landing on the keys is really nice for my tendons if I'm in "slam mode" but if I'm boob clouding I prefer my Filco.

Given that, $245+ for it is a bit of a stretch and the only reason I ended up buying it was raw curiosity + alcohol.
Realforce 87UW 45g - Filco Blue 87 - Filco Linear R - Filco Brown 104

Offline digitalleftovers

  • Posts: 645
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #17 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 16:29:20 »
I think someone should try a blind test.  Put the same caps on a Razer (Cherry Blue) a Ducky (Cherry Blue) and a filco (Cherry Blue).  I want to know how people would rate them.  There would be obvious preference one way or the other for the different stabilizers, but I'd be most interested to know how people prefer one plate type over another.

Oh... Thats what crazy audiophiles do with cables.  FAIL.  I guess we will just have to discuss forever about why we like one over the other.
Keyboards:
Filco 104 MX Brown (Otaku) - FKBN104M/NPEK 黒い空
Ducky TKL MX Brown/Blue 80% (White) - 1087-F 白の空
KBC Poker MX Red with PBT Key Caps - PFCN6000


"Consumers use touch screens.  Producers use keyboards."

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #18 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 16:35:48 »
Quote from: SuffixTreeMonkey;326845
Here's a controversial topic for you:

I've recently bought a G80-3000, so I'm "one of you guys" (but still a big newb), and I like the keyboard a lot, but I'm wondering how come this forum is (subjectively) often rooting for the Filcos and Topres.

I mean, besides things like different key switches, NKRO, and the fact that some keyboards aren't available on some continents, is there really a difference between say the Filcos (which costs ~90£ from thekeyboardco) and some of the cheaper keyboards? (I've got mine for 60Euro, which is a bargain compared to the Filco price).

The reason I called the thread "the audiophile effect" is because that community is known for buying overpriced tech with little to no measurable gain in sound quality. Since the audiophiles themselves would never admit they are unable to hear the difference, I doubt I'd get that answer here.

Looking forward to all the answers! And I'm sorry if I offended your amazing, expensive keyboard. :-)

I think that your opinion is right.
There's some dislike not supported by facts to anything that sounds not expensive or commercial, but I think that this stupid behavior is inevitable in any niche market.

What we need is to be smart enough to filter the facts from the  "hot air", when reading about mechs...
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline AgentHeavy

  • Posts: 35
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #19 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 16:51:50 »
Both audiophile and mechs keyboards are sick communities :p

Offline theferenc

  • Posts: 1327
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #20 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 17:23:34 »
As many have said, there are often tangible differences between even keyboards that use the same switch.
 
Cherry uses nice keys, but have lots of flex due to being PCB mounted.
 
Filco apparently had some controller issues, that EK shielded his buyers from, and uses pretty crappy keys, but is otherwise very well built.
 
The Model M is built like a tank, but is generally older, and not consistent between models due to spring fatigue. This can be avoided by just buying from Unicomp, but the looks are...lacking. I love mine, but it's definitely not for everyone. Layout customizability with a bit of work and some software is trivial.
 
Ducky makes an inexpensive board, but has reliability issues. And crappy keys.
 
Noppoo doesn't work on a Mac.
 
The RealForce is amazingly well built, and amazingly expensive. They do feel amazing though. Not worth the money to many people. A bargain at twice the price in the minds of many others.
 
The HHKB is not quite as well built as the RealForce, but in the same league price wise. However, it's compact form and UNIX layout is a huge draw factor for most of its owners -- myself included. It's only about the price of 5-6 new Sun type 6 keyboards, which is about the number that I wore out in the 2 years prior to purchasing it. It still feels brand new.
 
The Deck is a modder's delight, in that it can be opened without voiding the warranty. They are also the only readily available keyboard with Cherry MX clears.
 
With the exception of the Topre switch keyboards, most of them are in roughly the same price range. You pay more for some based on quality, some based on name, some based on size, some based on features.
 
It really all comes down to what you want out of your keyboard. I use Model Ms and a HHKB, all of which have the UNIX layout. That makes me crazy by some folks' standard, completely rational by others' standard.
 
I'll be honest, I am considering a second HHKB purchase. Yes it's expensive, but for the way I use my keyboard, it's worth the price. I am on it 12-14 hours a day, writing code and my dissertation, plus random chatting and commenting on these boards. At this point, that puts it at roughly $0.40/hour of use, based on my purchase date and price.
 
For the record, I think buying a Cherry switch keyboard is wasting money, but that's because I find it uncomfortable to type on, so for me, it is a waste of money. And just like the RealForce line, they all have the wrong layout. For you, it might be amazing. You might hate BS keyboards, while your neighbor may love them.
 
With something like a keyboard, especially if you're a heavy user, many of us are willing to spend as much as necessary to have one that is comfortable and long lasting. I know I am.

Edited to fix plate/PCB conflation. Thought one, wrote the other. Oops.
« Last Edit: Fri, 08 April 2011, 19:46:25 by theferenc »
HHKB Pro 2 -- Custom UNIX layout Unicomp Customizer 101 -- IBM Model M 1391401 (modded to UNIX layout) -- IBM 1397000 (also UNIX layout) -- SSK in UNIX layout -- Model F 122 key in UNIX layout (Soarer USB "native")
 
CST L-TracX trackball -- Kensington Expert Mouse trackball

Offline Soarer

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 1918
  • Location: UK
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #21 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 17:29:47 »
Phooey. (edit: to the OP and the post before theferenc's)

No mechanical keyboards are mass market, so even at the G80-3000 price point you're looking at more than 5x the price of a common rubber dome. The extra 50% for a Filco is very little by comparison, and what you get for that is tangible - plate mounting, metal case, NKRO - hardly esoteric stuff!

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 5860
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #22 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 18:27:21 »
Modern Cherry G80s are a bit flimsy compared to something like the Filco. Some people may prefer the Filco's plate mounted switches. Nonetheless, I wouldn't consider a Cherry G80 a bad keyboard, or a Filco an amazing one.

The Topres are in a league of their own in terms of currently produced keyboards, but it's very much debatable as to whether you are getting what you pay for.

Quote
Cherry uses nice keys, but have lots of flex due to being plate mounted.


Cherry makes the PCB mounted ones, Filco the plate mounted ones. Think about it, why would plate mounted cause more flex than just a PCB?

Quote
Filco apparently had some controller issues, that EK shielded his buyers from, and uses pretty crappy keys, but is otherwise very well built.


You're thinking of the Filco Zero. The Cherry Filco keyboards have perfectly sound controllers.

Offline theferenc

  • Posts: 1327
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #23 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 19:44:18 »
I actually was thinking PCB mounted, not sure why I wrote plate.

And if I was thinking of the Zero, then why have there been so many threads from people who bought Filcos from PCHome or Armygroup complaining about issues? And why has Majestouch claimed to have filtered them, if there weren't issues?

For the record, I have never even encountered a Zero, but have always wanted to. But I do know my officemate has a tenkeyless Filco with browns, and has had it swapped twice due to a faulty controller.

All of this is actually beside the point. Which is that any manufactured good will have issues, and you just have to decide which compromises you are willing to make at what price.
HHKB Pro 2 -- Custom UNIX layout Unicomp Customizer 101 -- IBM Model M 1391401 (modded to UNIX layout) -- IBM 1397000 (also UNIX layout) -- SSK in UNIX layout -- Model F 122 key in UNIX layout (Soarer USB "native")
 
CST L-TracX trackball -- Kensington Expert Mouse trackball

Offline K5Doom

  • Posts: 13
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #24 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 20:26:05 »
If you want to compare keyboards to audio equipment, Monster/Bose/Wess/etc... are expensive rubber dome (let's say an expensive logitech keyboard). Filco and other mechanical keyboards are Grado/Senn/AT/BD/etc...

You can find a Monster headphone that will cost way more than the entry level Grado headphones. Yet, Grado will blow it out of the water.

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #25 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 21:07:59 »
Quote from: K5Doom;327091
If you want to compare keyboards to audio equipment, Monster/Bose/Wess/etc... are expensive rubber dome (let's say an expensive logitech keyboard). Filco and other mechanical keyboards are Grado/Senn/AT/BD/etc...

You can find a Monster headphone that will cost way more than the entry level Grado headphones. Yet, Grado will blow it out of the water.


Frankly I can't fully agree.
In the High end/HIFI market, discarding some stupid excess like nanotube/platinum/whatever cables/dampeners and so on, when you get a (say) 500$ amplifier you get surely a better amplifier than a 100$ one.


In the keyboard market, when you get a 160$ keyboard you get a keyboard that is surely more costly to build, but you absolutely haven,t any guarantee that it's better than a 30$ one.
Just for an example I think that the keyboard of the thinkpad X100e, x120e, Edge 11, is still better than almost anything else, including most of the mech keyboards out there.

If you buy one of them on ebay you will spend something like 20/30$.
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline keyb_gr

  • Posts: 1384
  • Location: Germany
  • Cherrified user
    • My keyboard page (German)
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #26 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 09:13:36 »
Quote from: The Solutor;327101
In the keyboard market, when you get a 160$ keyboard you get a keyboard that is surely more costly to build, but you absolutely haven,t any guarantee that it's better than a 30$ one.

That's the old difference between what you like (subjective) and how it measures up (objective).

There are plenty of people who like Grado headphones in spite of commonly pedestrian measurement results and low-tech build, and others preferring gear with vacuum tubes in spite of higher cost and/or worse performance. There are a few people who don't like MX blues and prefer ALPS, too.

All subjective evaluation aside, there are a number of objective criteria defining a "well-working keyboard" - sensible layout, acceptable force levels / force-displacement characteristic, negligible off-center friction even on the big keys, reliable actuation, well-readable and durable lettering, and so on. That basically is the DIN 45500 of keyboards. Anything beyond that is a matter of personal taste or other requirements.
Hardware in signatures clutters Google search results. There should be a field in the profile for that (again).

This message was probably typed on a vintage G80-3000 with blues. Double-shots, baby. :D

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #27 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 09:36:26 »
Quote from: keyb_gr;327295
That's the old difference between what you like (subjective) and how it measures up (objective).

There are plenty of people who like Grado headphones in spite of commonly pedestrian measurement results and low-tech build, and others preferring gear with vacuum tubes in spite of higher cost and/or worse performance. There are a few people who don't like MX blues and prefer ALPS, too.

All subjective evaluation aside, there are a number of objective criteria defining a "well-working keyboard" - sensible layout, acceptable force levels / force-displacement characteristic, negligible off-center friction even on the big keys, reliable actuation, well-readable and durable lettering, and so on. That basically is the DIN 45500 of keyboards. Anything beyond that is a matter of personal taste or other requirements.




Entirely correct, but either way you measure a Topre keyboard its price is not justified by anything.

It's just a recursive way to price a product.

It's costly because is exclusive and is exclusive because its costly.

At least the cost of a cherry keyboard, like it or dislike it, is justified by the production costs
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 5860
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #28 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 09:47:32 »
Quote from: Mr. Perfect;326946
This reminds me of the Topre keychain world trip thread. Many people who have had the opportunity to try a Topre free of charge mention how it feels like a high quality rubber dome. People who own a Topre occasionally post about how they want to sexually molest their keyboard. Who's right?!

A single switch by itself isn't really a meaningful indicator of how a switch with that keyboard might feel like. For one, Kishy told me that the keychain key he tried bottomed out really hard. Just about anyone who types on a Topre keyboard says that they bottom out very softly. This isn't just applicable to Topres, there are people are prefer plate mounted Cherry switches over PCB mounted ones and vice-versa because the way in which they are mounted impacts on the feel.

Quote
Entirely correct, but either way you measure a Topre keyboard its price is not justified by anything.

It's just a recursive way to price a product.

It's costly because is exclusive and is exclusive because its costly.

At least the cost of a cherry keyboard, like it or dislike it, is justified by the production costs

Care to elaborate as to why a Cherry is justified by production cost and a Topre is not? Topres are much better built than most Cherry keyboards out there, and have a far more elaborate contact mechanism that pushes up the price.
« Last Edit: Sat, 09 April 2011, 09:51:22 by ch_123 »

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #29 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:04:40 »
Quote from: ch_123;327312

Care to elaborate as to why a Cherry is justified by production cost and a Topre is not?


Come on, a topre keyboard is just a membrane keyboard, you have just to build a pcb and a bubble silicon membrane on top of it.

The only addition is the conical spring, which is not an area 51 element.

To build a cherry you have to assembly every single switch, then you have to drill the pcb, then you have to put all the switches in place, then you have to solder the switches and I'm not so sure that this operation can be done whit a single pass wave soldering.

Really there's no reason that can justify the topre's price, other than the patent that covers the switch itself, which is not part of the keyboard feeling.
« Last Edit: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:11:47 by The Solutor »
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 5860
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #30 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:14:39 »
Quote from: The Solutor;327317
Come on, a topre keyboard is just a membrane keyboard, you have just to build a pcb and a bubble silicon membrane on top of it.


What are you on about? There's no membrane inside a Topre keyboard. I've even dismantled one and no sign of a membrane to be seen.

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #31 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:24:55 »
Quote from: ch_123;327324
What are you on about? There's no membrane inside a Topre keyboard. I've even dismantled one and no sign of a membrane to be seen.


How you call the gray silicone thing under the keys ?
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #32 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:30:36 »
Quote from: ripster;327333
A dome.

 Ok, call it dome.

Is still way cheaper element to build and to assemble than a mechanical switch.
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 5860
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #33 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:32:17 »
No membrane in a Topre. Has capacitive contacts in it.



Expensive things those capacitive keyboards are. IBM claimed that going from capacitive buckling springs to membrane buckling springs cut the production cost of their keyboards by 50%.

I'm somewhat unconvinced that Cherry switches really cost that much to make. Few plastic parts, a spring and a metal leaf, probably machine assembled. No need to worry about oscillators and signal sensors like a capacitive keyboard requires you to do.
« Last Edit: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:37:35 by ch_123 »

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 5860
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #34 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:39:29 »
Doesn't have the feeling of oneness with cup rubber.

Chinese junk...

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #35 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:39:40 »
Quote from: ch_123;327339
No membrane in a Topre.




"Membrane", actually, is the the wrong therm to define both the silicone springs or the flexible contact matrix used on the cheapest keyboards.

The term membrane should be used for something porous.

But if you accept this term to describe a subtle flexible plastic foil you should also accept it to describe a subtle rubber/silicone one.

BTW beside the term meaning i think you got what i mean.
« Last Edit: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:53:00 by The Solutor »
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 5860
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #36 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:40:28 »
Either way, your point was of questionable validity. Capacitive keyboards have always been more expensive than even individual electric switch keyboards.

In fact, if you start considering the slider and slider housing above the rubber dome, the Topre switch probably has as many parts as a Cherry MX switch. Sure you have to solder Cherry switches on to the board, but at least the board is a standard board with a few traces, and not something that has to implement a large number of capacitive sensing elements.
« Last Edit: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:53:34 by ch_123 »

Offline gregh

  • Posts: 36
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #37 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:43:42 »
I don't think you can truly compare this forum/scene to an audiophile forum/scene.

I'd wager that a lot of the people here are professionals who use their keybords for 8+ hours today, and make good money doing so. The highest end keyboards that are dealt with here, max out at about $275-$300. Most are in the range of $75 - $150.

That's chump change for a lot of working adults.

I have read about audiophiles spending $500 on a new knob for their receiver, or $10,000 speakers, etc. I'm sure most don't use these things for 8-12 hours per day and make money from doing so.

Having said that, keyboard feel is very subjective and I can see your point. From my experience, the cheaper keyboards do have lower build quality than some of the higher end ones, such as Topres.

Overall, I just don't think it's practical to compare a scene that tops out at $300, with a scene that tops out at God only knows what obscene price.

So I would say you're kind of comparing Apples to Oranges. They're both fruits, but that's as close as they come.

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #38 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:51:10 »
Quote from: ch_123;327348
Either way, your point was of questionable validity. Capacitive keyboards have always been more expensive than even individual electric switch keyboards.


For no reason other than patent costs (held by very few companies) .
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 5860
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #39 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:56:29 »
So why did the companies who made capacitive keyboards move away from capacitive  switching to either individual microswitches or membrane contacts?

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #40 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:57:05 »
Quote from: ripster;327358
It's just LIKE a audiophile forum.  It's FUN to argue.

You're all wrong.


Means that if I agree with you I will banned ?
:smile:
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline panda-R

  • Posts: 721
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #41 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 10:57:41 »
OMZG MY ToPRES FEEL JUST LIKE A RUBBER DOME! I've BEEN HAD!
DO YOU FEEL THE BEAT? I DO.
One Keyboard to DOOM them all, REALFORCE.

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #42 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 11:06:46 »
Quote from: ch_123;327360
So why did the companies who made capacitive keyboards move away from capacitive  switching to either individual microswitches or membrane contacts?


Likely because the reliability issues on the earlier designs due to the ambient variations.

Do you remember when in the late 80s, the coolest thing was the soft touch keyboards, initially shipped only on the high end tv sets and HIFI, later widespread and later disappeared completely ?
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #43 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 11:14:41 »
Quote from: panda-R;327362
OMZG MY ToPRES FEEL JUST LIKE A RUBBER DOME! I've BEEN HAD!

 Indeed It's a rubber dome keyboard, the different feeling is due mainly to the shape of the dome an the added spring.

Surely not because it has a capacitive switch.

Put a topre dome+spring on top of a membrane and you will get almost the same feeling.
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 5860
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #44 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 11:16:29 »
Quote from: The Solutor;327368
Likely because the reliability issues on the earlier designs due to the ambient variations.


Ah, that explains why they replaced one of the most reliable contact mechanisms with less reliable ones.

I guess the IBM patent talking about the dramatic production cost cuts was completely misleading?

Quote
Indeed It's a rubber dome keyboard, the different feeling is due mainly to the shape of the dome an the added spring.

Surely not because it has a capacitive switch.

Put a topre dome+spring on top of a membrane and you will get almost the same feeling.


No one said that the capacitive contacts were the reason why they felt different, merely the reason why they are expensive.

Care to explain how you could adapt a mebrane rubber dome keyboard to work with a spring between the dome and the membrane?

Offline AgentHeavy

  • Posts: 35
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #45 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 11:23:55 »
Quote from: The Solutor;327307
Entirely correct, but either way you measure a Topre keyboard its price is not justified by anything.

It's just a recursive way to price a product.

It's costly because is exclusive and is exclusive because its costly.

At least the cost of a cherry keyboard, like it or dislike it, is justified by the production costs


Do you have one to flame it like that ?

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #46 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 11:26:54 »
Quote from: ch_123;327373
Ah, that explains why they replaced one of the most reliable



Don't mix reliable with durable.

A capacitive switch is certainly durable because the lack of wearing physical contacts, but this doesn't mean that is also reliable, just because the capacitance of the switch can be affected by humidity, temperature, and so on.

So I SUPPOSE that years ago the electronics needed to get a capacitive switch reliable WAS costly.

Quote
Care to explain how you could adapt a mebrane rubber dome keyboard to work with a spring between the dome and the membrane?


Sorry where is the problem in doing that ?
« Last Edit: Sat, 09 April 2011, 11:30:50 by The Solutor »
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline Oqsy

  • Posts: 861
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #47 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 11:27:39 »
Quote from: ripster;327338
That's why you can buy one DealExtreme HHKB killer for 15 HHKBs.

I think you meant to say that the other way around.

While you're right about the economies of scale, I don't think there are enough ppl in the world that give a crap about a Topre to ramp up production enough to cut cost to DealExtreme levels, so the boutique prices of Topre switch boards will continue ;)
[sigpic]Currently in use: Rosewill RK9000 and CH DT225[/sigpic]
"Private misfortunes make for public welfare."

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #48 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 11:28:41 »
Quote from: AgentHeavy;327376
Do you have one to flame it like that ?


I don't flaming anything, I'm just saying that its cost its not justified by the production costs. Period.
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 5860
the audiophile effect (?)
« Reply #49 on: Sat, 09 April 2011, 11:30:19 »
Quote from: The Solutor;327378
Don't mix reliable with durable.

A capacitive switch is certainly durable because the lack of wearing physical contacts, but this doesn't mean that is also reliable, just because the capacitance of the switch can be affected by humidity, temperature, and so on.


And this is not the case of other switching types?

Quote
So I SUPPOSE that years ago the electronics needed to get a capacitive switch reliable WAS costly.


And what changed to make the Topre a rip off?

Quote
I don't flaming anything, I'm just saying that its cost its not justified by the production costs. Period.


What are your sources for the production costs of Topre keyboards? I'm genuinely fascinated now.