geekhack

geekhack Community => Keyboards => Topic started by: daerid on Fri, 11 August 2017, 16:37:06

Title: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: daerid on Fri, 11 August 2017, 16:37:06
http://www.logitech.com/en-us/product/k840-mechanical-corded-keyboard?crid=27 (http://www.logitech.com/en-us/product/k840-mechanical-corded-keyboard?crid=27)

Had a chance to try one of these out today at Best Buy. Super nice. The top case is just a flat piece of aluminum, and the font is nicely subdued and professional, not that god-awful gaming "G" font. No dedicated media keys, macro keys, backlighting, or other bells/whistles. Just a solid, full size board. Unfortunately, it being Romer-G there aren't any aftermarket caps available, and the stock ones are ABS.

Board feels like a really solid and smooth MX Brown, but with a slightly shorter throw (guessing closer to 1.5mm than 2mm). I do wish the cable was detachable, but overall it's not a bad board for $80

(https://assets.logitech.com/assets/65057/k840-mechanical-pdp.png)
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: dante on Fri, 11 August 2017, 16:51:15
Noise comparison to MX Brown?
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: pingmaster on Fri, 11 August 2017, 17:04:31
Give or take same to slightly louder. Depends on which brown chassis you are talking about.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: daerid on Fri, 11 August 2017, 17:12:55
Noise comparison to MX Brown?

I have a Masterkeys Pro S (87 key) w/ browns, and the RomerG is noticeably quieter. But IIRC my old Filco MJ2 w/ Browns was about as quiet as the RomerG
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: klennkellon on Fri, 11 August 2017, 17:20:53
New Romer G aren't bad. They seem to be less mushy now and a bit smoother.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: dante on Fri, 11 August 2017, 17:48:32
Yeah, not sure if this can overthrow the holy Dell KB-522.

I may stop by BB if I'm in the area to check it out.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Leslieann on Fri, 11 August 2017, 20:34:27
There is also an 87key variant.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 11 August 2017, 20:45:56
romerg is mechanically awesome..  and built by the best..
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: daerid on Fri, 11 August 2017, 21:47:56
There is also an 87key variant.

Only in the G line. The only 87 key Romer G boards I could find are the Pro (http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/pro-gaming-keyboard) and the G410 (http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/rgb-tenkeyless-gaming-keyboard-g410). The Pro definitely looks better than the G410 (yuck), but still has that god-awful gaming font, backlighting, media keys, and both cost about $50 more than the K840.

There's also a backlit gaming version of the K840, the G413 (http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/g413-mechanical-gaming-keyboard), which is $10 more at $89.00 USD.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Leslieann on Fri, 11 August 2017, 23:51:10
There is also an 87key variant.

Only in the G line. The only 87 key Romer G boards I could find are the Pro (http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/pro-gaming-keyboard) and the G410 (http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/rgb-tenkeyless-gaming-keyboard-g410). The Pro definitely looks better than the G410 (yuck), but still has that god-awful gaming font, backlighting, media keys, and both cost about $50 more than the K840.

There's also a backlit gaming version of the K840, the G413 (http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/g413-mechanical-gaming-keyboard), which is $10 more at $89.00 USD.
It's more than that, the keycap shape is different and lacks the emblems. I get it, it's no Filco, but for Logitech, this is pretty conservative in terms of looks.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: f32h80fsd08h34r5 on Sat, 12 August 2017, 01:16:55
Romer G's are okay, I don't know why they receive so much negative attention, they feel just fine to me  :thumb:

Not that I've ever actually used them for more than a few minutes, but as I remember them on my friends board, they weren't that bad.

Also, I think the G Pro looks pretty cool: https://www.gamecrate.com/sites/default/files/background_image/logitech%20g%20pro.jpg
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Leslieann on Sat, 12 August 2017, 04:23:36
Romer G's are okay, I don't know why they receive so much negative attention, they feel just fine to me  :thumb:

Not that I've ever actually used them for more than a few minutes, but as I remember them on my friends board, they weren't that bad.

Also, I think the G Pro looks pretty cool: https://www.gamecrate.com/sites/default/files/background_image/logitech%20g%20pro.jpg
I haven't heard any complaints really, though I haven't really been looking either. Testing them in store they felt good to me, but then I tend to like odd switches so I'm not sure how valid my perception of them would be.  :))
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: SBJ on Sat, 12 August 2017, 05:21:01
Romer G's are okay, I don't know why they receive so much negative attention, they feel just fine to me  :thumb:

Not that I've ever actually used them for more than a few minutes, but as I remember them on my friends board, they weren't that bad.

Also, I think the G Pro looks pretty cool: https://www.gamecrate.com/sites/default/files/background_image/logitech%20g%20pro.jpg
G Pro looks decent.
It's just my opinion though but the RGB makes it look more like a toy than a keyboard.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: dante on Sat, 12 August 2017, 10:05:35
There is also an 87key variant.

Only in the G line. The only 87 key Romer G boards I could find are the Pro (http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/pro-gaming-keyboard) and the G410 (http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/rgb-tenkeyless-gaming-keyboard-g410). The Pro definitely looks better than the G410 (yuck), but still has that god-awful gaming font, backlighting, media keys, and both cost about $50 more than the K840.

There's also a backlit gaming version of the K840, the G413 (http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/g413-mechanical-gaming-keyboard), which is $10 more at $89.00 USD.

Yeah, unfortunately all the current TKL versions scream L33T GAM3R; no clean looking TKL version of the K840 exists.

It does beg a question though, rubberdomes = cheap , Logitech has great rubberdomes , why not make a TKL of the Logitech Illuminated or other board in the line up?

A TKL of the discontinued Ultra-X Premium would make my panties moist indeed.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Sun, 27 August 2017, 14:12:55
New Romer G aren't bad. They seem to be less mushy now and a bit smoother.

So I recently tried a G910 in store and it felt great!  Nothing like the old mushy Romer-G I remembered.

I think they updated the switches and HUGE improvements on stabilizers (back then was mushier than Cherry stabilizer, now it feels like Costar).

However I tried G910 it was great, G810 however still had the same mushy stabilizer.

So now I'm wondering if anyone know K840 has the "clean" stabilizer?

Anyone actually bought this can confirm?


I'm actually really interested in purchasing the K840 if they have updated everything to reflect the clean typing feel of G910.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: daerid on Sun, 27 August 2017, 16:09:52
TBH, I absolutely love the way the K840 feels. However, until I can get PBT caps, Romer-G is a non-starter :(
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Mon, 28 August 2017, 10:52:52
TBH, I absolutely love the way the K840 feels. However, until I can get PBT caps, Romer-G is a non-starter :(

Did you remember anything regarding the stabilizer by any chance?  Typically Romer-G has horrible stabilizers, I was hoping K840 will come with the updated ones.

Maybe I should try to hunt down a display model somewhere hmmmm......
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: daerid on Mon, 28 August 2017, 12:19:43
The stabilized keys felt perfectly serviceable. I didn't think to pop off a key and see what was going on underneath tho :(
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Mon, 28 August 2017, 21:06:32
LOLLLL so I took a leap of faith and used google, this is what I found:

[attach=1]

ROMER G USES CHERRY STABILIZERS.

No wonder if suffers the same fate of "mushy bottom out".

Now I wonder if they have pre clipped models.  :P
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: ander on Tue, 29 August 2017, 00:51:36
Thanks for your great review, daerid.

I'd never heard of Romer-G's, and found this review of one of Logitech's other boards quite helpful:




Amazon currently has the K840 on sale for $59.99 with free shipping (https://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Mechanical-Keyboard-mechanical-Switches/dp/B071VHYZ62/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1503988205&sr=8-2&keywords=logitech+g413)—pretty cheap for any full-size mainstream MK.

Too bad there's no backlighting, as one of the Romer-G's distinctive features is how it optimizes lighting by placing the LED in the middle of the switch:


(http://img.danawa.com/images/descFiles/4/239/3238505_1472929941760.jpeg)


But the K840 was designed as a business board. And at the sale price, it seems like a good way for peeps who don't require disco effects to try these intriguing switches.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: ander on Tue, 29 August 2017, 04:27:35
This is fun 'n' interesting too:

Omron Factory Tour - The Making of a Logitech Romer-G Switch


Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: LiquidEvilGaming on Tue, 29 August 2017, 06:25:52
Putting aside my feelings of what I think about how the switch itself feels since that is subjective.

As long as they come stock with those god awful toy feeling keycaps and don't offer compatibility with MX stems to replace them.....I'm not sure how they could feel good to anyone based on those cheap horrid keycaps alone.  They really need to offer a model with PBT caps preferably thick ones or at the very least thicker ABS doubleshots.  Also if they have not already done so i'd love to see a Linear variant.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Tue, 29 August 2017, 22:10:21
Damn Omron factory is so amazing, makes me want to buy a Logitech keyboards now.

BUT why go through such lengths and not design their own stabilizers, sighhhhh.

So close Logitech, so close!
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: ander on Wed, 30 August 2017, 07:07:51
Yeah, but really, guys, for 60 bucks you're not going to get a Filco.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Wed, 30 August 2017, 10:41:21
Yeah that's the dilemma, it's like at that price it's hard to turn it down.  :P
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: klennkellon on Wed, 30 August 2017, 16:47:36
If they made it with better caps it would be a good recommendation for someone who wants a nice quiet tactile board imo. at least they dont use some blocky tron razer font.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: LiquidEvilGaming on Thu, 31 August 2017, 09:43:20
Yeah, but really, guys, for 60 bucks you're not going to get a Filco.

No,but even $30 Velocifire boards come stock with better keycaps, the ones Logitech uses are just ****. 
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: daerid on Sat, 02 September 2017, 00:53:06
Lack of PBT/aftermarket caps are the only reason I haven't picked one up yet :(
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Sun, 03 September 2017, 22:12:16
lol I jumped the gun and bought it.  Amazon had a sale I couldn't resist.

As I suspected the stabilizer feels "meh" because Cherry.  So I might attempt to void the warranty and desolder the 8 stabilized switches and clip mod the stabilizers.

But otherwise I think they definitely updated the Romer G switches, I think it used to have "cushion legs" built into the switch stem but now it definitely feels like they took it out because the bottom out feel is nice and crisp (minus the Cherry stabilized ones).

It's like a short travel Brown with less wobble and actuation point right at the top.

I quite like it so far.  Will update once I clip mod the stabilizers.  :)
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: tp4tissue on Sun, 03 September 2017, 23:34:47
lol I jumped the gun and bought it.  Amazon had a sale I couldn't resist.

As I suspected the stabilizer feels "meh" because Cherry.  So I might attempt to void the warranty and desolder the 8 stabilized switches and clip mod the stabilizers.

But otherwise I think they definitely updated the Romer G switches, I think it used to have "cushion legs" built into the switch stem but now it definitely feels like they took it out because the bottom out feel is nice and crisp (minus the Cherry stabilized ones).

It's like a short travel Brown with less wobble and actuation point right at the top.

I quite like it so far.  Will update once I clip mod the stabilizers.  :)

but then it'd be louder
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Duckyreddy on Mon, 04 September 2017, 00:13:33
It's branded as the "G413" here in NZ, I tried it at the shop just the other day and it feels really solid actually, glad Logi got rid of those keycaps that were found on the G910! :p
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Tue, 05 September 2017, 20:39:37
lol I jumped the gun and bought it.  Amazon had a sale I couldn't resist.

As I suspected the stabilizer feels "meh" because Cherry.  So I might attempt to void the warranty and desolder the 8 stabilized switches and clip mod the stabilizers.

But otherwise I think they definitely updated the Romer G switches, I think it used to have "cushion legs" built into the switch stem but now it definitely feels like they took it out because the bottom out feel is nice and crisp (minus the Cherry stabilized ones).

It's like a short travel Brown with less wobble and actuation point right at the top.

I quite like it so far.  Will update once I clip mod the stabilizers.  :)

but then it'd be louder

It's a tiny bit louder than what it was before but I think it's still quieter than Cherry MX variants, and feels WAY better than their old version (more like mechanical keyboard now).

It's branded as the "G413" here in NZ, I tried it at the shop just the other day and it feels really solid actually, glad Logi got rid of those keycaps that were found on the G910! :p

I think you're thinking the gaming keyboard hence the "G"413.  Which is this:  http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/g413-mechanical-gaming-keyboard

But the one I got is their office line hence the "K"840.  Which is this:  http://www.logitech.com/en-ca/product/k840-mechanical-corded-keyboard?crid=27

It's very similar except G413 has backlight and K840 doesn't have any lighting functions at all.

For me I generally don't care about lighting so this works for me.

Oh and now that I've clipped and lubed the stabilizers it's SOOOOOOOO much better.  I will write an review after 1 week.  :)
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Duckyreddy on Tue, 05 September 2017, 20:44:25


It's branded as the "G413" here in NZ, I tried it at the shop just the other day and it feels really solid actually, glad Logi got rid of those keycaps that were found on the G910! :p

I think you're thinking the gaming keyboard hence the "G"413.  Which is this:  http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/g413-mechanical-gaming-keyboard

But the one I got is their office line hence the "K"840.  Which is this:  http://www.logitech.com/en-ca/product/k840-mechanical-corded-keyboard?crid=27

It's very similar except G413 has backlight and K840 doesn't have any lighting functions at all.

For me I generally don't care about lighting so this works for me.

Oh and now that I've clipped and lubed the stabilizers it's SOOOOOOOO much better.  I will write an review after 1 week.  :)
[/quote]



Oops, Silly me! I didn't know that!
They look so similar and I guess I wasn't paying attention, that's very cool.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Duckyreddy on Tue, 05 September 2017, 21:03:51
I'm not a big fan of lighting either!

Lighting just means more things to break over time... :)
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Tue, 05 September 2017, 21:11:48
I'm not a big fan of lighting either!

Lighting just means more things to break over time... :)

lol for me I think I own 1 backlit keyboard, which I just turn the light on to take pretty pictures then turn it off after.

For me it feels odd seeing light from the bottom peripheral vision.  That and generally non backlit version is cheaper anyway which is a bonus.  :P
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Duckyreddy on Tue, 05 September 2017, 21:49:37
Lol, totally relatable!
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Sat, 09 September 2017, 22:43:39
Here I've wrote a review about this keyboard:  https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=91503.0

Feel free to ask if you have any questions.

:)

I'll upload a typing video some point later in time lol.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: czarek on Thu, 14 September 2017, 05:14:28
Sweet. I tried Romer G in store few times and liked it a lot, but the gaming keyboard looks were a turn off. This one looks good, but I'd really like the light coloured version.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Thu, 14 September 2017, 21:27:12
There is a light coloured version?  :eek:
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Mon, 18 September 2017, 21:20:48
Okay here's some update, so I've had some crazy long online chat with friends tonight and my wrist are getting tired.

So I don't know if it's the typing angle or weight (feel like heavier than MX Brown but lighter than MX Black, normally I'm used to MX Brown / 45g Topre).

I'll update you guys as I use it but so far off the bat if you like light weight switches Romer-G might be a tab bit heavier than what you're used to.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: daerid on Sun, 24 September 2017, 16:50:44
I've always felt that shorter throws make for more tired fingers/wrist. It's why I could never get into o-rings for cherry or topre :(
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Coffee on Sun, 24 September 2017, 19:29:43
I tried this keyboard and ended up returning it. I have found that I really don't like shorter travel distances on my switches. I really did not care much for this switch at all. For the price though, I can see how this could be attractive to some people looking for a quieter and affordable keyboard for the office.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: typo on Sun, 24 September 2017, 22:14:34
TP and I agree as usual. The inside of the keys on the backlit models, like G-410 is the same thing are white inside. Doubleshot, Dye Sub? Plenty of people love GMK so......
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Sun, 24 September 2017, 23:03:24
I've always felt that shorter throws make for more tired fingers/wrist. It's why I could never get into o-rings for cherry or topre :(

I think this might be it, I always find for typing long travel feels more comfortable.

Though I haven't try gaming yet to see if it actually is more "responsive".

Will have to test that out later.  :P
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Duckyreddy on Sun, 24 September 2017, 23:19:22
The pad-printed caps though, It's a shame there aren't many Replacement Romer-G's caps available...
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: typo on Mon, 25 September 2017, 01:30:25
Oh man that blows. Anyone serious pretty much has to forget it then. Even if we touch type that ends up to be such an ugly mess. Especially the mileage most of us put on. Being no extra caps how can anyone here even consider it? The switch is not that fantastic. It's nice but something that light(to me) I would rather Realforce even with difference in price.

Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: typo on Mon, 25 September 2017, 03:27:11
Wait a second, you mean the 810 is pad printed? How could the 410 possibly be pad printed? The light has to shine through. Unless there is something I do not know.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Duckyreddy on Mon, 25 September 2017, 03:31:18
Wait a second, you mean the 810 is pad printed? How could the 410 possibly be pad printed? The light has to shine through. Unless there is something I do not know.

My bad for not clarifying, I mean the K840 is pad-printed, I'm not sure about the 810 or 410  :p
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: SpAmRaY on Mon, 25 September 2017, 05:33:09
Wait a second, you mean the 810 is pad printed? How could the 410 possibly be pad printed? The light has to shine through. Unless there is something I do not know.
until recently most stock oem backlit caps are just abs caps with black paint over translucent plastic

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: typo on Mon, 25 September 2017, 06:59:26
Recently, What are they now? I mean in mainstream brands. Also it is G413 for the no frills backlit one. I mentioned "G410". It is interesting with gamers. Now mechanical keyboards in the US are mainly marketed to gamers. Many state that the G413 is the entry level model and they moved up from a rubber dome. For typing it is fine. not wanting media keys etc. Some say it flexes others say it is rock solid. Of course reading on best buy Duh. Honestly I do not see how the Topre RGB is worth $260 to a typist. even though I bought it. It does not even feel like an Actual REalforce. I am not sure about Romer-G switches but it would certainly seem like a better value for someone simply typing. An actual Real force is a different story. Apparently for the 413 the silver has white led's and the carbon, red. It appears to be a 3mm led in the middle of the spring. I am not positive about that since especially today everything is SMD. In an automated factory it is actually much easier to do SMD than through hole. For instance in audio the very high end equipment is all through hole still and costs a fortune. Average home theater stuff is all SMD.

I am thinking of this as a candidate to stop constantly servicing my old Deck's. however I have a feeling the build quality is not even close. Probably I will just go rip all the blue led's out of one now and replace with white. I think coming from this, especially at the weight I have the switches it will not suit me. I will certainly go look. Deck has been my daily driver for years. The TG3 ones. I have a bunch of other high end boards. Romer-G does pique my interest. Plus Logitech is as has been mentioned top notch. Not only in their product quality but their CS is second to none. Say it broke, new one on the way. That simple. Given that I really would not go abuse that. Luckily over the years I suppose not many people did or they could not continue with such a policy. I love Logitech's quality. even if it is made in china does not matter in this case.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: SpAmRaY on Mon, 25 September 2017, 07:29:21


Recently, What are they now?

Pretty sure the romer g caps are just painted or some coating over translucent abs. The questionable quality of the keycaps is keeping me from even trying the board.

Found these on the interwebz

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170925/c512c5d91b75f369562c8b99ac5a1938.jpg)(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170925/30b0cf326225e0bdd1d0c83e869684c9.jpg)

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: quasistellar on Mon, 25 September 2017, 15:11:20
Romer-G keycaps are god damned terrible, to be sure.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: typo on Mon, 25 September 2017, 17:20:48
That is a shame. Scratch this off. The Ornata sucks too but it feels really good. So I might use it once in a long while. I am guessing Romer-G is not up to the quality of Cherry anyways. Maybe Kaith. The 413 keycap I saw was completely white inside though.

Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: quasistellar on Tue, 26 September 2017, 09:03:04
The switches themselves are really nice, in my opinion.  The new Kailh Copper switches are somewhat similar in feel (I have some in a board now to compare).

I can't really comment on how undamped Romer-G feels, though.  I heard the newer boards don't have the up and downstroke damping?  Honestly I liked it but to each their own.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: typo on Tue, 26 September 2017, 19:26:27
There can be something that kill's something otherwise good as being viable. In this case the poor key caps and lack of aftermarket sets. For a keyboard this cheap I am liking the Ornata. Go feel it. The box has the arrow keys exposed. I guess they felt pretty confident then. Who knows if anyone likes it better. Let's be honest though we are talking about very low end keyboards here. They can still have good traits but probably not the whole package. I wish companies would make high end versions.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Tue, 26 September 2017, 20:43:24
To be honest after 2 weeks of using it, the keycaps itself never bugged me.

Though the switch itself does feel like there's more friction and takes a little bit more effort to use as oppose to say MX Brown.

However everyone have their own preference so I can still see some people might like this, but as a general recommendation I'd suggest people start with MX Brown.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: ander on Sat, 30 September 2017, 21:29:23
As long as they come stock with those god awful toy feeling keycaps and don't offer compatibility with MX stems to replace them.....I'm not sure how they could feel good to anyone based on those cheap horrid keycaps alone.  They really need to offer a model with PBT caps preferably thick ones or at the very least thicker ABS doubleshots...

...Even $30 Velocifire boards come stock with better keycaps, the ones Logitech uses are just ****. 

Lack of PBT/aftermarket caps are the only reason I haven't picked one up yet :(

The pad-printed caps though, It's a shame there aren't many Replacement Romer-G's caps available...

Oh man that blows. Anyone serious pretty much has to forget it then. Even if we touch type that ends up to be such an ugly mess. Especially the mileage most of us put on. Being no extra caps how can anyone here even consider it?...

LOL, you guys are so spoiled.

For what it's worth, quality pad printing is designed to last quite a while. If you're wearing it out, maybe it's not the printing's fault, but that of your cleanliness habits. Do you sit down and type with dirty hands? Is that a civilized thing to do even on keebs that aren't pad-printed?

I have PP keebs I've used for years that show no wear. (In my pre-MK days, I went through at least a dozen MS Natural Keyboards, and the PP legends were still crisp after the RDs had worn out.) Clean fingers are much less abrasive than dirty ones—just something to consider.


I've always felt that shorter throws make for more tired fingers/wrist. It's why I could never get into o-rings for cherry or topre :(

That seems odd, since O-rings are designed to absorb shock. Maybe you were just typing too hard, using more effort than necessary?

The best typists tune into their keys's actuation points and "skim" over them, using only as much force as they need to generate characters. It can help to think of what you're writing in terms of phrases, rather than words or characters. Then you tend to use your fingers, hand and forearm as a single, smoothly operating unit.

With your conscious mind focused on the meaning (rather than the mechanics) of what you're writing, your unconscious mind—which, let's face it, is controlling your muscles anyway—can use them most efficiently.

It's counterintuitive, but you actually have more control over your fingers when you don't try to use them independently. I learned this from classical piano. Chopin wrote piano etudes that are impossible to play until you relax and move from the larger parts of your body (hand, forearm, upper arm, torso), allowing you to make smoother, more unitized movements. Typing's just like that.

Anyway, sorry to babble... I just feel that if anything, O-rings should make typing easier, as long as you're not working harder than you need to.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: typo on Sat, 30 September 2017, 22:23:04
Come on, who is going to wash their hands every single time they use their personal keyboard? I do in fact wash my hands many times a day nonetheless. PP just seems to disappear on me and I am actually pretty clean. Shiny abs would be more of a spoiled thing imo.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: LiquidEvilGaming on Sun, 01 October 2017, 02:49:40
As long as they come stock with those god awful toy feeling keycaps and don't offer compatibility with MX stems to replace them.....I'm not sure how they could feel good to anyone based on those cheap horrid keycaps alone.  They really need to offer a model with PBT caps preferably thick ones or at the very least thicker ABS doubleshots...

...Even $30 Velocifire boards come stock with better keycaps, the ones Logitech uses are just ****. 

Lack of PBT/aftermarket caps are the only reason I haven't picked one up yet :(

The pad-printed caps though, It's a shame there aren't many Replacement Romer-G's caps available...

Oh man that blows. Anyone serious pretty much has to forget it then. Even if we touch type that ends up to be such an ugly mess. Especially the mileage most of us put on. Being no extra caps how can anyone here even consider it?...

LOL, you guys are so spoiled.

For what it's worth, quality pad printing is designed to last quite a while. If you're wearing it out, maybe it's not the printing's fault, but that of your cleanliness habits. Do you sit down and type with dirty hands? Is that a civilized thing to do even on keebs that aren't pad-printed?

I have PP keebs I've used for years that show no wear. (In my pre-MK days, I went through at least a dozen MS Natural Keyboards, and the PP legends were still crisp after the RDs had worn out.) Clean fingers are much less abrasive than dirty ones—just something to consider.


I've always felt that shorter throws make for more tired fingers/wrist. It's why I could never get into o-rings for cherry or topre :(

That seems odd, since O-rings are designed to absorb shock. Maybe you were just typing too hard, using more effort than necessary?

The best typists tune into their keys's actuation points and "skim" over them, using only as much force as they need to generate characters. It can help to think of what you're writing in terms of phrases, rather than words or characters. Then you tend to use your fingers, hand and forearm as a single, smoothly operating unit.

With your conscious mind focused on the meaning (rather than the mechanics) of what you're writing, your unconscious mind—which, let's face it, is controlling your muscles anyway—can use them most efficiently.

It's counterintuitive, but you actually have more control over your fingers when you don't try to use them independently. I learned this from classical piano. Chopin wrote piano etudes that are impossible to play until you relax and move from the larger parts of your body (hand, forearm, upper arm, torso), allowing you to make smoother, more unitized movements. Typing's just like that.

Anyway, sorry to babble... I just feel that if anything, O-rings should make typing easier, as long as you're not working harder than you need to.


Spoiled? No most of us just don't like to type on trash plastic.  Maybe most of us are just used to quality keycaps?  But Honestly when the $30...yes $30 dollar for the ENTIRE keyboard velocifire comes with nicer keycaps(Medium thick doubleshot translucent ABS) than the logitech does...hell most cheap chinese boards do now...there is simply no excuse.  Stop fanboying for Logitech and just admit the Keycaps are some of the worst on the market.  Outside of the horrible printing method they feel like typing on plastic used to make knockoff GI JOE soldiers sold at dollar stores.  Perhaps that is acceptable to you?  But to me and most anyone else on an enthusiast forum it is not.  The key difference here is on an MX stem you can replace them...since this is ROmer G you are stuck with the stock trash. 

The complete lack of quality is simple inexcusable at every possible level.
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: typo on Sun, 01 October 2017, 04:54:57
I hopt that is not aimed at me? I fully agree the Logitech boards have junk keys and have said so. Pretty much all these "gaming" boards do. At least if one has MX stems you are not stuck with them. I am also not the one that mentioned "spoiled". I will say ABS can in fact be nice if from companies such as GMK or SP. Many custom sets in these easily top $300. I do tend to prefer PBT myself. How come some relatively inexpensive boards can have for instance Vortes Double Shot PBT. Yet high end manufacturers cannot or will not produce them? You either from DS ABS or DyeSub PBT. Nonetheless some here love shiny GMK and SA sets. At that level it is personal preference. They are certainly not bad by any means. I would have to think even in DS ABS they are beter than the likes of Vortex. I do not honestly know though. Never tried Vortex. Perhaps they are outstanding but I doubt it. I think Ducky has their own DS PBT. I cannot se that being better than a $300+ ABS DS set but I don't know. The keyboard in this topic is like $50 and their most expensive one is about $129. What does one expect from a company that spends a ton on marketing. The keyboard you mention I do not know of either but honestly have no interest whatsoever in a $30 keyboard lol. In that sense perhaps spoiled but I would not say so. I would say Logitech is hardly a enthusiast keyboard by any means. They do probably make some of the finest mice. Although that too is personal preference. Most here would probably be using a trackball anyways and not from Logitech!
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: LiquidEvilGaming on Mon, 02 October 2017, 15:05:14
I hopt that is not aimed at me? I fully agree the Logitech boards have junk keys and have said so. Pretty much all these "gaming" boards do. At least if one has MX stems you are not stuck with them. I am also not the one that mentioned "spoiled". I will say ABS can in fact be nice if from companies such as GMK or SP. Many custom sets in these easily top $300. I do tend to prefer PBT myself. How come some relatively inexpensive boards can have for instance Vortes Double Shot PBT. Yet high end manufacturers cannot or will not produce them? You either from DS ABS or DyeSub PBT. Nonetheless some here love shiny GMK and SA sets. At that level it is personal preference. They are certainly not bad by any means. I would have to think even in DS ABS they are beter than the likes of Vortex. I do not honestly know though. Never tried Vortex. Perhaps they are outstanding but I doubt it. I think Ducky has their own DS PBT. I cannot se that being better than a $300+ ABS DS set but I don't know. The keyboard in this topic is like $50 and their most expensive one is about $129. What does one expect from a company that spends a ton on marketing. The keyboard you mention I do not know of either but honestly have no interest whatsoever in a $30 keyboard lol. In that sense perhaps spoiled but I would not say so. I would say Logitech is hardly a enthusiast keyboard by any means. They do probably make some of the finest mice. Although that too is personal preference. Most here would probably be using a trackball anyways and not from Logitech!

My post?

It was directed towards @ander
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: daerid on Mon, 02 October 2017, 18:48:19
It's not a matter of being spoiled or not. I hate the way ABS feels. It grates on my nerves :(
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: typo on Mon, 02 October 2017, 22:10:34
I am hating Windows new spell check dammit(sic). Anywhoo, this is USA okay? Unfortunately some people do not even have the internet let alone a bed. That does not make one that is in a position to be picky about what touches their fingertips spoiled.  I did not make the rules. Seriously though some people love "nice" ABS. In fact I cannot fault the GMK set that was $300 I am using right now LOL. Plus back to the first issue which I of course honestly did not actually mean. I bet 99% of those signed up here work and/or are in school. Both probably involving a lot of typing. I mean to a guy that drills holes for a living probably has a Milwaukee or Dewalt. So, tools of the trade kind of matter. I know that Geek, Nerd etc. is a culture beyond simply Keeb's but that is kind of our focus here. Why not shut down this site and we all type on Rubber Domes other than Topre? I am not at all picking a fight with you. I am just saying it is a preference amongst preferences. It is not exactly a 40 Carat Diamond ring. Even then, that is "excessive" not spoiled. Spoiled is like e a kid that insists on eating Desert first and it must be pudding every night. That is my understanding of the world LOL. Yeah, I don't get out much!

daerid, I have a feeling you might like these GMK's. Or not.

Liquid, I am just joking around. Actually I do not disagree with you to some extent but it is what it is. To the vast wealth of people that do not even know the difference. Luckily this is not nearly as bad as for instance a Woman's bag Forum HAHA!

OH Cr@p how do I shut this darn spell check off? It is built into the latest build of Windows across the board. Mac probably knows it's users are more intelligent or better yet Linux. I am such a Geek and so spoiled I have a Giant Linux Penguin here! My preference, but I code for Windows. Okay, too much information......
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: SpAmRaY on Tue, 03 October 2017, 05:53:02


In fact I cannot fault the GMK set that was $300 I am using right now LOL.

What GMK set is $300??? :eek:

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: typo on Tue, 03 October 2017, 23:41:10
Not sure it is "Pluto" or something. It has Blue, Grey and white keys. I was just guessing if you add it together it would be like 300 bucks. Since it did not come as a full set. It was someone else's anyways. Truthfully, I only paid them $50 LOL. I had a printed sheet with the cost of the different rows. I was just guessing from memory though. I did not mean that to be exact. I was just mentioning that there are $5 key caps and ones in the Hundreds of Dollars. I do see most full GMK sets are $85 to $125 about. I was probably in fact wrong but I did not mean for that statement to be Gospel :) Anyways, that is in response to people using $5 Rubber Dome boards. Even if the keyset is only $75, plus a board, perhaps rings, lube etc. There is certainly "price range" of keyboards. I am telling you Guy's because I am sure none of you know this LOL!

Edit: I see most full set GMK customs run about $200 and as much as $400. So my thinking they were $300 about was probably inline.

It is interesting that Vortex PBT-POM infill full set is like $30. Perhaps not all ABS is created equal?
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: ander on Sun, 08 October 2017, 04:54:26
Come on, who is going to wash their hands every single time they use their personal keyboard? I do in fact wash my hands many times a day nonetheless. PP just seems to disappear on me and I am actually pretty clean. Shiny abs would be more of a spoiled thing imo.

I'm just judging from how most of my friends's keebs look when I visit them: like they've been dragged through mud. (The keebs, I mean, not the friends... Well, not all of the friends.) And I think (but don't say), "Yick, dude, how can you live like that? But I don't think they notice, because the grime accumulates so gradually.

Anyway, no, I don't expect anyone to wash their hands before they sit down to type. I like to, though, because I like the feeling of clean fingers on a clean keeb. It shows respect for my writing and work, and I enjoy taking good care of my stuff in general. So I guess it's just me.


Spoiled? No most of us just don't like to type on trash plastic.  Maybe most of us are just used to quality keycaps?  But Honestly when the $30...yes $30 dollar for the ENTIRE keyboard velocifire comes with nicer keycaps(Medium thick doubleshot translucent ABS) than the logitech does...hell most cheap chinese boards do now...there is simply no excuse.  Stop fanboying for Logitech and just admit the Keycaps are some of the worst on the market.  Outside of the horrible printing method they feel like typing on plastic used to make knockoff GI JOE soldiers sold at dollar stores.  Perhaps that is acceptable to you?  But to me and most anyone else on an enthusiast forum it is not.  The key difference here is on an MX stem you can replace them...since this is ROmer G you are stuck with the stock trash... The complete lack of quality is simple inexcusable at every possible level.

LOL—it just shows you how subjective this all is.

The keys on my G710 feel fine to me. As long as they're in good shape—not grimy or scratched or whatever—all KB keys feel fine to me. I do notice how switches feel, and how boards sound and respond to typing. But what kind of plastic the keys are made of, or if they're textured or not, or whatever, meh. It's like sitting down at a piano and agonizing over the kind of plastic the keys are made of. It's a lot more important how the piano plays and sounds, IMHO, how it responds as an instrument.

And hey, how about all these fancy "artisan" keys some of you guys shell out hundreds of bucks for, with little skull faces and trolls and dragons and stuff? Now those look uncomfortable.


(https://keypressgraphics.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/9-artisans.jpg)


Are you seriously telling me that typing on some flat, smooth, "cheap" ABS keys is less comfortable than typing on something like those? Even if one or two of them didn't cost as much as the whole board? Yeesh. Maybe I'm not masochistic enough to be a "real" KB enthusiast.  :?)
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Hyde on Mon, 09 October 2017, 14:56:55
I did notice PBT changes the typing sound, I'm one of the few people that prefer ABS "thock".  Because PBT is a harder more brittle material so the sound will turn out to be "thinner" and less resonant.

But different PBT set have different mixture, somehow out of all the PBT sets I've tried I like Poker 2's stock PBT the best.  It feels somewhat inbetween ABS and PBT, kind of like a hybrid between the 2.

As for the case of Logitech K840, it feels fine because it's just like any other ABS keycaps which never bothered me.

I do admit keycap preference is very subjective though so not everyone likes the same thing.

If anything I've had the keyboard for about 3 weeks now and key switch finally smoothed out so the switches are less scratchy than when I first got them.

Hopefully it will eventually be as smooth as my MX Brown (which is super worn in now and extra smooth).
Title: Re: Logitech K840 - a non-ugly Romer G board
Post by: Budman on Tue, 10 October 2017, 22:55:23
I was at Best Buy today buying a TV mount and wandered to keyboard section. I couldn't help to buy this K840 being it is on sale for $59 this week and it is a switch I have never experienced. After using it briefly here is my take.

The Romer-G switch itself feels to me just like higher force MX Browns. The stroke has tad more friction/scratchiness in them than MX Brown. They also feel higher force than MX Browns overall and box confirms this. The box states 55g of "pressure point" force and shows it as peak force early in stroke, 45g at activation force it says after a drop from peak. You can feel this when you go slow to feel the stroke but typing full speed I just feel the 55g. These also sound like a quieter version of Browns - you still get the clack at the bottom of but it is more subdued and not as hard plastic sounding. I actually do quite like this switch for typing so far though.

The consistency and quality across the keyboard though is not good IMO. Most all of the keys feel the same but some of the bigger keys are toublesome, like Backspace and left-CTRL, suffer from binding when pressed off center. I can very easily duplicate this over and over slowly pushing these keys down off-center. This is something I expect for cheap membrane keyboards, not pricey mechanical.  I don't like the feel of this backspace key at all as it also rattles. Playing around  some more with all the keys now, I also discovered bad  off-center binding with TAB key too and the spacebar has a horrible metallic ringing/rattling sound, like a loose stabilizer bar underneath the key. One could use this in an office environment EXCEPT with this spacebar as it kills the subdued sound of the switches.

I also am not a fan of the open air "keys on slab" form and look. Reminds me of the AZIO mechanical I bought from Fry's last year (although this is much better looking. I like the dark simple stated look of this keyboard actually). Because of the form and tall keys combined with the lighter switches, I am experiencing same thing I experienced with the Matias Pro Quiet Click and the AZIO, and that is I keep activating the menu button with my right palm when typing fast and also have activated the left windows key as well a few times. A wrist wrest would probably alleviate this issue but I am not a fan of having to use wrist wrests as just another thing to buy to compensate for tall sensitive keyboards. (I tend to keep my wrists on desk when I type and move the fingers mostly)

I will be returning this for refund tomorrow as this keyboard doesn't offer anything really compelling. It is a shame because like I mentioned I do like this switch so far.  I can see this being a great board to buy years ago when Cherry was still protected by patent, but now with MX dropping in price and the variety of cheap Chinese clones, this Romer-G is a tough sell despite it being better than Browns IMO.  I guess one plus is that a mass market mechanical keyboard is available at major retailer for $80.

Fix the larger keys issues and maybe add in a USB port in next revision and I would be probably keeping this thing.