Nifty. What a fun design!Yeah it was fun and challenging as well xD.
I like how it looks! A beautiful vintage board!
Big and full-featured but still clean and minimal - I like it.
Only think I'd ask for are E-White and Navy color options.
Your IC form is asking me to submit an email. I'll be passing on the form.Thank you for the interest! I will keep the updates here and on my social media as well!
That aside, the board is interesting and I'll be keeping an eye on it.
split backspace?Noted and will be added
Brass & CF plate options ?Will take into consideration. Thanks for the feedback and interest!
Very cool design, as for input you may want to add true ISO left shift (you did reverse ISO left shift, like on WYSE50/60 boards) . Also if you could make the split space fit into the WKL layout that would be awesome.Aight will try and see how it goes for the true ISO. Split space bar with WKL will be added
I do wish the board supported another key to the right of the space bad
Brass & CF plate options ?
This is so fun. Love the retro design. GLWICThank you thank you
I do wish the board supported another key to the right of the space badwill work around the layouts and I will see what I can come up with. Thanks for your feedback!
really fun design, angled f-row is sexy! i also really like the beige two-toned board - would that be ano or some sort of coating. the pic looks texturedit will be either E-coat or powder coat, will update along the road :D
Pretty one, I'm keeping a close eye on the project!Thank you thank you! I do keep updates frequently and progress on my discord if you're interested. And thank you for the interest!
Two more changes I'd like to see personally would be the USB C centered and lowered to the bottom of the back of the keyboard under the raised section. Where it is now looks very high.Yeap, it has been updated and for mounting option, I'm improving the plate. Will keep you updated. Thanks for the feedback!
That, and gasket or other softer mounting option, assuming there's no flex cuts to otherwise soften the experience.
oh I would do some very legally questionable things to get my hands on this*sweats nervously*
I hope you're gonna offer a hotswap pcb. I soldering 1800s takes a bit too much time.
I hope you're gonna offer a hotswap pcb. I soldering 1800s takes a bit too much time.I am offering both hotswap and solder. I will soon finalise layout config on both pcbs. Thanks for the feedback!
This looks fun, keeping an eye out for this one.Thank you thank you! I post updates and progress on my discord as well if you're interested
Love the idea, will be following the project. Could you consider widening the recessed USB-C port so that thicker connectors would fit?The new model have relocate the port to the bottom case, will update on the new renders soon!
Very into this design! Will definitely be looking to get one if possible.Yeap, there will be a powder coat colorway which I will show soon. Thanks for the interest!
Please try to make some powder-coat finish options available, as the texture in the renders is just perfect for this!
This is amazing! If the price is right I'm definitely gonna have to snag thisYes, there will be a carrying case
Is there a chance there will be a case included to support this board?
Looks great so far! Will other knobs be compatible with the encoder/case?yess, the encoder is 18mm diameter (for reference GMMK Pro knob).
This keyboard is awesome.
I like the retro look, the 40 degree F-row, the old school lamp covers and the knobs. Don't change too much.
Count me in!
Does it come with those knobs?.. ...I like knobs
Ooooh wow this would pair beautifully with my Korg SV2 Piano...Very noiceeShow Image(https://cdn.pianodreamers.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/korg-sv2s-keyboard@2x.jpg)
Very cool design, as for input you may want to add true ISO left shift (you did reverse ISO left shift, like on WYSE50/60 boards) . Also if you could make the split space fit into the WKL layout that would be awesome.
I'm interested to buy if the price is sub $500,
BUT I have one problem with the layout: I find it's hard to touch-type the numpad without the space between Enter and Numpad section. I hope you can do an exploded layout. Instant buy from me.
Also optional: BLE version if possible.
Awww sorry to see the arrow keys go. 😔+1
+2Awww sorry to see the arrow keys go.+1
Awww sorry to see the arrow keys go. 😔
+3
I too am disappointed to hear the arrow keys are gone. I will wait for new renders before passing judgement.
Yeah no arrow keys is a bit of a shame.
One of the reasons for use and charms of full-size(ish) keyboard is, at least for me, no need for layers as you have keys for days. You can customise everything to your needs and not rely on your layers. This is why this change is so controversial for me. If I was to look for keyboard that will force me to use layers I would look for one that would give me at least lots of desk space in return (meaning 40-60%). TypeBox in its current form sacrifices both usability (forcing me to use layers) and desk space (being big chungus of a board) for undoubtedly unique and attractive form. I understand this take, but makes me not interested in TypeBox.Yeah no arrow keys is a bit of a shame.
You can and should use the bottom of the numpad row as arrow keys on default layer (non num-locked).
I had the same comment as you then tried recently and it's actually as simple and natural...
One of the reasons for use and charms of full-size(ish) keyboard is, at least for me, no need for layers as you have keys for days. You can customise everything to your needs and not rely on your layers. This is why this change is so controversial for me. If I was to look for keyboard that will force me to use layers I would look for one that would give me at least lots of desk space in return (meaning 40-60%). TypeBox in its current form sacrifices both usability (forcing me to use layers) and desk space (being big chungus of a board) for undoubtedly unique and attractive form. I understand this take, but makes me not interested in TypeBox.Yeah no arrow keys is a bit of a shame.
You can and should use the bottom of the numpad row as arrow keys on default layer (non num-locked).
I had the same comment as you then tried recently and it's actually as simple and natural...
I guess I am not alone in this feeling as there are many voices grieving after arrow cluster.
If one more person tells me to use layers...Yeah no arrow keys is a bit of a shame.
You can and should use the bottom of the numpad row as arrow keys on default layer (non num-locked).
I had the same comment as you then tried recently and it's actually as simple and natural...
If one more person tells me to use layers...Yeah no arrow keys is a bit of a shame.
You can and should use the bottom of the numpad row as arrow keys on default layer (non num-locked).
I had the same comment as you then tried recently and it's actually as simple and natural...
Why don't you just use a keyboard with 3 keys, one for layer up, one for layer down, and one for input. It's just as efficient as a fullsize keyboard!
Fr if it works for you that's great but layers just don't vibe with me.
Since geekhack didn't like my previous response all I have to say is this designer can design whatever they like, but if they drive away too many people there's no way in heck this is getting off the ground.If one more person tells me to use layers...Yeah no arrow keys is a bit of a shame.
You can and should use the bottom of the numpad row as arrow keys on default layer (non num-locked).
I had the same comment as you then tried recently and it's actually as simple and natural...
Why don't you just use a keyboard with 3 keys, one for layer up, one for layer down, and one for input. It's just as efficient as a fullsize keyboard!
Fr if it works for you that's great but layers just don't vibe with me.
Let a designer design. If one needs arrows so badly maybe this board just isn't for you. As much as it's not on layer enjoyers to dictate preferences to people that don't like them not like people can dictate layouts because they can't use more than two fingers at a time.
And the designer can choose to ignore the input, but he isn't designing it only for himself.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G986B met Tapatalk
I'm not claiming otherwise.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G986B met Tapatalk
Damn, thanks for the info! I'll head over there now and vote in the poll.I'm not claiming otherwise.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G986B met Tapatalk
Indeed, sorry if it came out weird. Was more so to add to your statement as well and encourage some really passionate to go voice over there. :)
For anyone following this thread and not keeping track on discord, arrow keys seems to be back as well as some other changes to the layout.
And yet....Oh no but you don't understand you have to let a designer design what they want to design even though what you initially were interested in isn't part of the project anymore.Show Image(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230225/f75272f1723fefd25abb8736bd3fce74.jpg)
Verstuurd vanaf mijn SM-G986B met Tapatalk
Hey guysss,
Just chiming in on the confusion with arrows keys, so to avoid further arguments.
As the votes are in, I have decided to go with AT layout (no arrow keys). Which
I have sent to a CAD engineer for inspection and to remodel. I'm mostly active
on discord where we can discuss and talk.
Sorry to heard some of ya'll will be leaving on this journey, and hopefully
I could make something that will interest you again in the future.
I'm truly grateful for the interest and the attention I've received with Type Box.
I really am, thanks.
Hey guysss,
Just chiming in on the confusion with arrows keys, so to avoid further arguments.
As the votes are in, I have decided to go with AT layout (no arrow keys). Which
I have sent to a CAD engineer for inspection and to remodel. I'm mostly active
on discord where we can discuss and talk.
Sorry to heard some of ya'll will be leaving on this journey, and hopefully
I could make something that will interest you again in the future.
I'm truly grateful for the interest and the attention I've received with Type Box.
I really am, thanks.
To start, I just want to say that I think you're a valuable asset to the hobby as one of the great up-and-coming designers, and I completely respect that you created that poll to gauge interest in either layout as I think that was a great thing to do. However, something I noticed was that it had a very low participation rate compared to the number of people who know about this keyboard and who initially had great interest in it, which I largely think is due to the fact that the poll wasn't well publicized, the poll was released a bit late in the game after it was announced that the arrow keys were deleted from the design (which frankly turned a lot of people off and made them lose interest and stop following the project at that point), and it just didn't reach as many people as a result of that to give a full and accurate picture of what people really wanted on either side. I'm very active in the hobby online and found that a lot of people I knew that were initially interested in the board had no clue about the poll, since they stopped following the project after they heard about the deletion of the dedicated arrow keys before the poll was posted on Discord (and then also finding out that the poll had concluded a couple months ago with votes being in favor of no arrow keys). After going to a recent keyboard meetup (my first one ever), this same thing randomly came up in conversation with many people there, and the vast majority of which had the same exact experience after losing interest and no longer following the project after the announcement of the loss of arrow keys, but before the poll was posted.
Long story short, I think the results of that poll would have been very different had it been posted sooner (especially if it was done before any layout changes removing arrow keys were made and announced both here and on Discord). One interesting thing is that the gap in the poll numbers has been closing ever since the decision was made on the layout back around February, as it's currently 74-62, and seems there would have been much greater interest in it than the poll reflects based on all the people I've had conversations with about this project, as it's now much less functional for a lot of people than originally intended.
To end on a positive note, I did want to say that I love how open you've been to receiving feedback from people on this project all along, and how well you've handled any critical feedback with a very kind and professional tone. This remains one of my favorite keyboard designs to date, and will probably be the largest board I'll ever buy simply because I love the very unique aesthetics of it. Due to the loss of dedicated arrow keys, it unfortunately won't likely be in my regular rotation as I had originally intended, but hopefully I'll find some sort of reasonable workaround that won't trip me up or slow down my workflow too much so I can use it fairly often (something that doesn't use layers or that doesn't compromise the numpad layout). Either way, I'm glad that we have such a creative designer in the hobby like you who is also so open to listening to the potential buyers of your creation, and I'll certainly be watching to see what interesting designs you come up with in the future.
Thank god someone smarter than me said this, because it 100% encapsulates my feelings.Hey guysss,
Just chiming in on the confusion with arrows keys, so to avoid further arguments.
As the votes are in, I have decided to go with AT layout (no arrow keys). Which
I have sent to a CAD engineer for inspection and to remodel. I'm mostly active
on discord where we can discuss and talk.
Sorry to heard some of ya'll will be leaving on this journey, and hopefully
I could make something that will interest you again in the future.
I'm truly grateful for the interest and the attention I've received with Type Box.
I really am, thanks.
To start, I just want to say that I think you're a valuable asset to the hobby as one of the great up-and-coming designers, and I completely respect that you created that poll to gauge interest in either layout as I think that was a great thing to do. However, something I noticed was that it had a very low participation rate compared to the number of people who know about this keyboard and who initially had great interest in it, which I largely think is due to the fact that the poll wasn't well publicized, the poll was released a bit late in the game after it was announced that the arrow keys were deleted from the design (which frankly turned a lot of people off and made them lose interest and stop following the project at that point), and it just didn't reach as many people as a result of that to give a full and accurate picture of what people really wanted on either side. I'm very active in the hobby online and found that a lot of people I knew that were initially interested in the board had no clue about the poll, since they stopped following the project after they heard about the deletion of the dedicated arrow keys before the poll was posted on Discord (and then also finding out that the poll had concluded a couple months ago with votes being in favor of no arrow keys). After going to a recent keyboard meetup (my first one ever), this same thing randomly came up in conversation with many people there, and the vast majority of which had the same exact experience after losing interest and no longer following the project after the announcement of the loss of arrow keys, but before the poll was posted.
Long story short, I think the results of that poll would have been very different had it been posted sooner (especially if it was done before any layout changes removing arrow keys were made and announced both here and on Discord). One interesting thing is that the gap in the poll numbers has been closing ever since the decision was made on the layout back around February, as it's currently 74-62, and seems there would have been much greater interest in it than the poll reflects based on all the people I've had conversations with about this project, as it's now much less functional for a lot of people than originally intended.
To end on a positive note, I did want to say that I love how open you've been to receiving feedback from people on this project all along, and how well you've handled any critical feedback with a very kind and professional tone. This remains one of my favorite keyboard designs to date, and will probably be the largest board I'll ever buy simply because I love the very unique aesthetics of it. Due to the loss of dedicated arrow keys, it unfortunately won't likely be in my regular rotation as I had originally intended, but hopefully I'll find some sort of reasonable workaround that won't trip me up or slow down my workflow too much so I can use it fairly often (something that doesn't use layers or that doesn't compromise the numpad layout). Either way, I'm glad that we have such a creative designer in the hobby like you who is also so open to listening to the potential buyers of your creation, and I'll certainly be watching to see what interesting designs you come up with in the future.
Unfortunately it seems that the final decision to remove the arrow keys was made many months ago, and that choice is now solidified as I believe the PCB design and other layout/design details are now finalized and getting ready for the GB to begin sometime in the coming months. Interestingly enough, as of today the poll on the Hymn Network Discord Server now has the Standard 1800 layout (with dedicated arrow keys) ahead of the WT-AT layout (without arrow keys) with a 1 point lead (82-81). I fully expected this would happen over time as more people found their way to the Server and found out about the poll, as not many people knew about that poll for the layout when it was active and mattered, especially compared to all the people who knew about this beautiful board.
Are you still planning to buy one? I'll probably still get one if finances permit, mainly because of the beautiful design and macro capabilities, even if it's not remotely as useable to me without dedicated arrows.
Unfortunately it seems that the final decision to remove the arrow keys was made many months ago, and that choice is now solidified as I believe the PCB design and other layout/design details are now finalized and getting ready for the GB to begin sometime in the coming months. Interestingly enough, as of today the poll on the Hymn Network Discord Server now has the Standard 1800 layout (with dedicated arrow keys) ahead of the WT-AT layout (without arrow keys) with a 1 point lead (82-81). I fully expected this would happen over time as more people found their way to the Server and found out about the poll, as not many people knew about that poll for the layout when it was active and mattered, especially compared to all the people who knew about this beautiful board.
Are you still planning to buy one? I'll probably still get one if finances permit, mainly because of the beautiful design and macro capabilities, even if it's not remotely as useable to me without dedicated arrows.
I totally agree! As a rare creative 100%+ keyboard, I want to say it would be a pity if it cannot also support the standard 1800 layout. Is it possible to design a compatible PCB using two layout json files? People can then choose their preferred layout to flash. By the way, will there be any sound units included, such as valves or buzzers (or both)? I have suggested this feature to be considered a while ago. It would be amazing if it could make some sound and if one of the LEDs on the top-right side would flash while buzzing~
I like how the exterior design looks and feels, but it would be nice if you also shared the internal structure of this board.
Also, you might add some engraving such as a logo or name for the bottom case to add some signature