geekhack

geekhack Marketplace => Interest Checks => Topic started by: cocobrais on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:30:44

Title: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: cocobrais on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:30:44
Hello Guys!
Here I come back again with SA Handarbeit+ keyset which is one of the most interesting colorway set.

Inspried by Cherry G81-3000HBD OG Handarbeit keyboard.

Some guys have been asking Handarbeit set with SA profile after GMK Handarbeit+ R1 GB, and finally SA Handarbeit+ set was designed.

I'd like to introduce the SA Handarbeit+.

Although SA Handarbeit+ is the same as the colorway of GMK Handarbeit, you can add this to your Handarbeit collection because the profile is different.


Manufacturer : Signature Plastics
When : To be updated (Expect April 2021)
Where : Drop.com

KITS
All kits are being almost finalized, but will consider your suggestions before starting the GB.
Let me know your opinion!

Base : 1-1-2-3-4-3 Profile
(https://i.imgur.com/uw1elSN.png)

Horizontal R3 : 3-3-3-3-3 Profile
(https://i.imgur.com/U3hs3m7.png)

Numpad : 1-1-2-3-4-3 Profile
(https://i.imgur.com/YfTrsT2.png)

Spacebar : R3 Spacebar and R3/R4 'B' for Alice kayout
(https://i.imgur.com/UYSjoZi.png)


RENDERS
(https://i.imgur.com/VzaQR6n.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/lGHN5fb.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/cb51cN8.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/Lazrwjd.png)


Profile Comparison (Base kit vs Horizontal R3)
(https://i.imgur.com/azP7ADb.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/qWlbvxx.png)


Enjoy!
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: yoot on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:31:43
nice
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: of_sam on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:32:25
cmon man
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Agilr on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:32:45
why
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: productkun on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:32:56
Can we get other venders except Drop please?

Kind regards,
EU member
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: mydens on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:33:53
This looks like a desperate attempt to cover a board with SP grab bags  :D
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: HoodrowThrillson on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:35:22
Can we get other venders except Drop please?

Kind regards,
EU member

No.

King regards,
Drop
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: swomi on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:38:58
I want this in the bin
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: MinaDarsh on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:47:15
No... Just no...









... Could there come alternative deep dish homing too for the R3 kit? H, U, N and T in yellow?

Edit: Wasn't aware of the whole situation with Handarbeit, this is a bummer that it went as it seems it did... :(
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: lewisflude on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:48:30
This is too far away from the original concept to make sense IMO
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Afresh on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:50:53
 :mad:
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: NovaRMK on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:51:56
is anyone else on the verge of a mental breakdown?
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Nuclear Nachos on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:54:02
is anyone else on the verge of a mental breakdown?
i think we all are
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: bisoromi on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:55:33
i love SA
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Bub on Thu, 18 March 2021, 08:57:25
I'm all for SA handarbeit existing (even though I don't like SA), but it seems odd to me that you would launch this a month before GMK R2 on a different vendor. What's the goal of launching them so close together?
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: ISOxSwap on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:00:07
Hello Guys!
Here I come back again with SA Handarbeit+ keyset which is one of the most interesting colorway set.

Inspried by Cherry G81-3000HBD OG Handarbeit keyboard.

Some guys have been asking Handarbeit set with SA profile after GMK Handarbeit+ R1 GB, and finally SA Handarbeit+ set was designed.

I'd like to introduce the SA Handarbeit+.

Although SA Handarbeit+ is the same as the colorway of GMK Handarbeit, you can add this to your Handarbeit collection because the profile is different.


Manufacturer : Signature Plastics
When : To be updated (Expect April 2021)
Where : Drop.com

KITS
All kits are being almost finalized, but will consider your suggestions before starting the GB.
Let me know your opinion!

Base : 1-1-2-3-4-3 Profile
Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/uw1elSN.png)


Horizontal R3 : 3-3-3-3-3 Profile
Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/U3hs3m7.png)


Numpad : 1-1-2-3-4-3 Profile
Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/YfTrsT2.png)


Spacebar : R3 Spacebar and R3/R4 'B' for Alice kayout
Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/UYSjoZi.png)



RENDERS
Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/VzaQR6n.png)

Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/lGHN5fb.jpg)

Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/cb51cN8.png)

Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/Lazrwjd.png)



Profile Comparison (Base kit vs Horizontal R3)
Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/azP7ADb.png)

Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/qWlbvxx.png)



Enjoy!
SP said no to DSS Handerbate, so du u got approval from Cherry to use this?
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: dededecline on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:02:03
Oh, so this is why you denied permission for SP DSS Hand Work to run, despite the fact that Handarbeit is not an original colorway?

Guess that explains rushing this and GMK R2 out, gotta reestablish your ownership.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: dingusxmcgee on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:02:46
Can we get other venders except Drop please?

Kind regards,
EU member

No.

King regards,
Drop

Thank you king.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: KuroTheCrazy on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:03:01
Let's just take GMK kitting and render it in SA. rip other board compat that SA can accommodate by putting some effort in to the kits.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Langelandia on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:07:55
Oh, so this is why you denied permission for SP DSS Hand Work to run, despite the fact that Handarbeit is not an original colorway?

Guess that explains rushing this and GMK R2 out, gotta reestablish your ownership.

100% this... d*** move, bruh
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Pontus on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:08:44
I would consider if there were other vendors
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: hali on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:12:30
can i pretend this doesnt exist
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Hedgey on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:18:40
Oh, so this is why you denied permission for SP DSS Hand Work to run, despite the fact that Handarbeit is not an original colorway?

Guess that explains rushing this and GMK R2 out, gotta reestablish your ownership.

If this is true, what a seriously scummy move to do.  No one should support this type of behavior, it's inexcusable.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: TheBlackHammer on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:20:55
It’s almost like someone approached you months ago about running a set similar. I wonder where you got the SP idea from...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: ee on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:27:45
this is literally not allowed
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Kokaloo on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:28:19
I guess if we're allowed to take ownership of colors used on old boards and slap down any projects that I don't have to approve of I hereby claim ownership of Beige and Dolch. I'll leave WoB to Drop and BoW to Dixie just because I'm feeling a bit generous.

(https://i.imgur.com/eINA8nx_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium)

Here's SP's reasoning for not wanting to run  Dss hand work.  (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=110942.0) This convinces me that Coco wasn't willing to provide SP with the facts that Handarbeit was based on an old board to keep the set under his control.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: geohammy on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:37:08
 :eek:
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: flyingpanda on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:41:53
at this rate, it shouldn't be called handarbeit. more like hand-me-your-money. what an ***hole.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: tominabox1 on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:48:57
Not interested.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: NoPunIn10Did on Thu, 18 March 2021, 09:58:45
Just a note that this post needs to go to a different subforum:

https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004 (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004)

Quote
Effective immediately, all IC's that are posted which are intended to be ran via Massdrop are not allowed to be posted in the IC sub-forum.  This includes topics that contain links to vote for a keyset or item through Massdrop.  These topics should be made in the Massdrop sub-forum.  Topics that are made in the IC sub-forum will be moved to the Massdrop sub-forum.

Please use the report feature to let the mod team know of any topics that fit the above rule.  We are seeing more and more 'hype' topics being made in the IC sub-forum that take little to no feedback from members.  That isn't the purpose of this sub-forum, nor the site.  Massdrop has its own discussion medium that can be used to this end.

This decision comes from the entire moderation team and there will be no exceptions to the rule.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: nasp on Thu, 18 March 2021, 10:19:50
This is what greed looks like
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: yoniwolf1202 on Thu, 18 March 2021, 10:24:24
I guess if we're allowed to take ownership of colors used on old boards and slap down any projects that I don't have to approve of I hereby claim ownership of Beige and Dolch. I'll leave WoB to Drop and BoW to Dixie just because I'm feeling a bit generous.

Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/eINA8nx_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium)


Here's SP's reasoning for not wanting to run  Dss hand work.  (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=110942.0) This convinces me that Coco wasn't willing to provide SP with the facts that Handarbeit was based on an old board to keep the set under his control.
Can I take ownership of the Olivia colorway? If this ownership works retroactively, I will be cracking down on GMK Cafe to take what's rightfully mine.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: succulentdan on Thu, 18 March 2021, 10:28:50
oh awesome, time for my daily dose of pain. imagine if this was in the dss profile....and catered towards 40s. what a concept.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Ella on Thu, 18 March 2021, 10:39:32
i would swear but I cannot
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Thu, 18 March 2021, 10:54:38
Just a note that this post needs to go to a different subforum:

https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004 (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004)

Quote
Effective immediately, all IC's that are posted which are intended to be ran via Massdrop are not allowed to be posted in the IC sub-forum.  This includes topics that contain links to vote for a keyset or item through Massdrop.  These topics should be made in the Massdrop sub-forum.  Topics that are made in the IC sub-forum will be moved to the Massdrop sub-forum.

Please use the report feature to let the mod team know of any topics that fit the above rule.  We are seeing more and more 'hype' topics being made in the IC sub-forum that take little to no feedback from members.  That isn't the purpose of this sub-forum, nor the site.  Massdrop has its own discussion medium that can be used to this end.

This decision comes from the entire moderation team and there will be no exceptions to the rule.

Appreciate the diligent community policing of these threads (no sarcasm, I realize it may come across that way). The IC rules have been updated to remove this Drop-specific rule, as the community as a whole has shifted since the rule was implemented.


Here's SP's reasoning for not wanting to run  Dss hand work.  (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=110942.0) This convinces me that Coco wasn't willing to provide SP with the facts that Handarbeit was based on an old board to keep the set under his control.

I don't see mention of SP's reasoning for not running DSS Handarbeit in that thread, can anyone fill me in on the details? Handarbeit as about as close to public domain as you can get with unique keyset designs... how can any one person possibly claim ownership, aside from perhaps the original Cherry employee that put it together (who I doubt is our affable OP here)?
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: manaorme on Thu, 18 March 2021, 10:59:55
I'm in for both GMK and SA.
Except the R3 one.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: pancake on Thu, 18 March 2021, 11:05:17
this is better
Title: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: TheBlackHammer on Thu, 18 March 2021, 11:05:56
Just a note that this post needs to go to a different subforum:

https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004 (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004)

Quote
Effective immediately, all IC's that are posted which are intended to be ran via Massdrop are not allowed to be posted in the IC sub-forum.  This includes topics that contain links to vote for a keyset or item through Massdrop.  These topics should be made in the Massdrop sub-forum.  Topics that are made in the IC sub-forum will be moved to the Massdrop sub-forum.

Please use the report feature to let the mod team know of any topics that fit the above rule.  We are seeing more and more 'hype' topics being made in the IC sub-forum that take little to no feedback from members.  That isn't the purpose of this sub-forum, nor the site.  Massdrop has its own discussion medium that can be used to this end.

This decision comes from the entire moderation team and there will be no exceptions to the rule.

Appreciate the diligent community policing of these threads (no sarcasm, I realize it may come across that way). The IC rules have been updated to remove this Drop-specific rule, as the community as a whole has shifted since the rule was implemented.


Here's SP's reasoning for not wanting to run  Dss hand work.  (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=110942.0) This convinces me that Coco wasn't willing to provide SP with the facts that Handarbeit was based on an old board to keep the set under his control.

I don't see mention of SP's reasoning for not running DSS Handarbeit in that thread, can anyone fill me in on the details? Handarbeit as about as close to public domain as you can get with unique keyset designs... how can any one person possibly claim ownership, aside from perhaps the original Cherry employee that put it together (who I doubt is our affable OP here)?

Yea so basically I designed a set using similar colors but all stock SP chips. The colors were similar to original handarbeit and I titled it hand work. It was set to be in the DSS profile which is a popular profile in the 40s community. I tried to contact coco several times to give a heads up that I was using the similar colors. I even went as far as contacting his original vendors to see if they could contact him/her. I had no luck with contacting so I went on and went with getting quotes from SP for the DSS hand work set. Once I submitted everything Melissa from SP got back to me and said they can’t run the set because the original Creator (coco) did not give permission and went out of their way to contact SP to say so. Essentially coco is gatekeeping colors and it seems like bringing this set to SP is a way to completely cut me out or is a cash grab. Either way it seems a little rude. It ultimately led me to completely change the colors and redesign how I was planning on running the set.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Kokaloo on Thu, 18 March 2021, 11:08:49
I don't see mention of SP's reasoning for not running DSS Handarbeit in that thread, can anyone fill me in on the details? Handarbeit as about as close to public domain as you can get with unique keyset designs... how can any one person possibly claim ownership, aside from perhaps the original Cherry employee that put it together (who I doubt is our affable OP here)?

It's not in that thread, SP's response to BlackHammer getting quotes is the image I attached in my post. Hand Work had more traction and activity through the 40% discord where that was posted.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Zambumon on Thu, 18 March 2021, 11:13:25
Given the story behind Handarbeit, it feels wrong running it in any other profile other than Cherry.

It also feels wrong starting an interest check for this when a new round of GMK Handarbeit is happening soon.

Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Thu, 18 March 2021, 11:16:48
Yea so basically I designed a set using similar colors but all stock SP chips. The colors were similar to original handarbeit and I titled it hand work. It was set to be in the DSS profile which is a popular profile in the 40s community. I tried to contact coco several times to give a heads up that I was using the similar colors. I even went as far as contacting his original vendors to see if they could contact him/her. I had no luck with contacting so I went on and went with getting quotes from SP for the DSS hand work set. Once I submitted everything Melissa from SP got back to me and said they can’t run the set because the original Creator (coco) did not give permission and went out of their way to contact SP to say so. Essentially coco is gatekeeping colors and it seems like bringing this set to SP is a way to completely cut me out or is a cash grab. Either way it seems a little rude. It ultimately led me to completely change the colors and redesign how I was planning on running the set.

Damn... That's incredibly ****ty! This set is not coco's design... They even claimed to have "designed" the set a few years ago, after having seen the original. Just...what?

I don't see mention of SP's reasoning for not running DSS Handarbeit in that thread, can anyone fill me in on the details? Handarbeit as about as close to public domain as you can get with unique keyset designs... how can any one person possibly claim ownership, aside from perhaps the original Cherry employee that put it together (who I doubt is our affable OP here)?

It's not in that thread, SP's response to BlackHammer getting quotes is the image I attached in my post. Hand Work had more traction and activity through the 40% discord where that was posted.

Oh ****, sorry, I'm at work so the image didn't load up. I gotcha now though, thanks.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: nasp on Thu, 18 March 2021, 11:22:50
Senior Hoffman, not sure if you have any ties to Drop other then their ownership of this forum, but if you do, will you please inform them of this situation? It's incredibly bad look for them to be running this set given OP's false claims of ownership to the Handarbeit image. Most people around here know that Drop doesn't need more bad PR tied to them. Thanks
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Thu, 18 March 2021, 11:28:10
Senior Hoffman, not sure if you have any ties to Drop other then their ownership of this forum, but if you do, will you please inform them of this situation? It's incredibly bad look for them to be running this set given OP's false claims of ownership to the Handarbeit image. Most people around here know that Drop doesn't need more bad PR tied to them. Thanks

I do not have any ties to Drop, but will gladly pass this info along. :thumb:
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: keyberzerker on Thu, 18 March 2021, 11:53:09
So it seems COCO got this Idea way before DSS Hand work was in the plan...

Seems COCO contacted SP and was in the planning with them to run SP Handarbeit BEFORE, DSS Hand work was in plan.

In my eyes, COCO did GMK Handarbeit so he has some credit to "own" the idea of running anything handarbeit-wise.


Fu.. the haters and bandwagoning.

I am buyin! :thumb:



Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: tominabox1 on Thu, 18 March 2021, 11:59:43
So it seems COCO got this Idea way before DSS Hand work was in the plan...

Seems COCO contacted SP and was in the planning with them to run SP Handarbeit BEFORE, DSS Hand work was in plan.

In my eyes, COCO did GMK Handarbeit so he has some credit to "own" the idea of running anything handarbeit-wise.


Fu.. the haters and bandwagoning.

I am buyin! :thumb:

How different does it have to be to be free to run in your mind?

Remember Coco didn't invent handarbeit at all, just like 7bit didn't invent space cadet, just like oblotsky didn't invent space cadet, just like I didn't invent space cadet, just like hhkbp2 didn't invent space cadet
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: HappyB0T on Thu, 18 March 2021, 12:03:37
Not interested.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: KucherenkoZZZ on Thu, 18 March 2021, 12:07:24
NO GOD!!! PLEASE NO!!! NOOOOOOOO!!!
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: TheBlackHammer on Thu, 18 March 2021, 12:21:37
So it seems COCO got this Idea way before DSS Hand work was in the plan...

Seems COCO contacted SP and was in the planning with them to run SP Handarbeit BEFORE, DSS Hand work was in plan.

In my eyes, COCO did GMK Handarbeit so he has some credit to "own" the idea of running anything handarbeit-wise.


Fu.. the haters and bandwagoning.

I am buyin! :thumb:
From my understanding SP wasn’t contacted until I posted my interest check for hand work. So yea...I could be wrong but from my contacts it seems I presented dss hand work, then SP was contacted. The reasoning for hand work spawned out of the want for faster turnaround and a new profile. All of which I expressed in my initial interest check. And coincidentally is also mentioned here. I knew there would possibly be a gmk r2 because most popular sets get a r2 but no one knew of a SP variant


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: factoryofidols on Thu, 18 March 2021, 12:21:47
How could anyone support this set now that it is clear that someone is trying to take ownership over something that isn’t theirs. The fact that you blocked DSS hand work from running is so scummy I can’t imagine how anyone could support this set.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Ustinj on Thu, 18 March 2021, 12:31:02
Senior Hoffman, not sure if you have any ties to Drop other then their ownership of this forum, but if you do, will you please inform them of this situation? It's incredibly bad look for them to be running this set given OP's false claims of ownership to the Handarbeit image. Most people around here know that Drop doesn't need more bad PR tied to them. Thanks

Wow, I hardly comment on these kinds of things but this seems like a downright sh**** thing to do. And it's a shame SP would be willing to go along with this - even worse the issue here is it seems Drop has done a lot of things that are considered 'wrong', but hopefully they'd be willing to hear this out.

Not cool of OP!!
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Hedgey on Thu, 18 March 2021, 13:08:59
So it seems COCO got this Idea way before DSS Hand work was in the plan...

Seems COCO contacted SP and was in the planning with them to run SP Handarbeit BEFORE, DSS Hand work was in plan.

In my eyes, COCO did GMK Handarbeit so he has some credit to "own" the idea of running anything handarbeit-wise.


Fu.. the haters and bandwagoning.

I am buyin! :thumb:

Imagine simping for a lying sack of garbage, who's only goal is to use people like you to make money. 

If there was ever a bandwagon, you're riding in it, homie.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Ella on Thu, 18 March 2021, 13:58:51
So it seems COCO got this Idea way before DSS Hand work was in the plan...

Seems COCO contacted SP and was in the planning with them to run SP Handarbeit BEFORE, DSS Hand work was in plan.

In my eyes, COCO did GMK Handarbeit so he has some credit to "own" the idea of running anything handarbeit-wise.


Fu.. the haters and bandwagoning.

I am buyin! :thumb:
(https://i.imgflip.com/3ewk9y.jpg)
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: dandruff on Thu, 18 March 2021, 14:00:43
I want to be on the right side of history and tell my future kids I fought for what I believed in!

Coco bad!
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: MIGHTY CHICKEN on Thu, 18 March 2021, 14:01:07
bad, you get bonk
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: v683 on Thu, 18 March 2021, 15:41:39
Besides the valid criticism, what this can use is a colevrak kit for r3 because I see great potential for Workman/Colemak users
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Chippy on Thu, 18 March 2021, 17:47:31
seems odd to run this in a non cherry profile, given the lore.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Tree_ on Thu, 18 March 2021, 17:56:00
Looks like DSS Hand Work died because Coco is a garbage human being.

Not interested.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: cocobrais on Thu, 18 March 2021, 18:00:38
Sorry for the lack of the communication in a few hours. I had been sleeping after posting the IC because KR has different time line.
I saw the many comments about this set, specially related to 'DSS Hand work'.

As I have some language barriers, I can't comment with long writing, but I can tell that I had a plan to run the SA Handarbeit already August 2020 and I have contacted and discussed with Drop from last December.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: tominabox1 on Thu, 18 March 2021, 18:04:30
Sorry for the lack of the communication in a few hours. I had been sleeping after posting the IC because KR has different time line.
I saw the many comments about this set, specially related to 'DSS Hand work'.

As I have some language barriers, I can't comment with long writing, but I can tell that I had a plan to run the SA Handarbeit already August 2020 and I have contacted and discussed with Drop from last December.

How does a 40s focused DSS set impact running 60+ SA set? Why can't they both exist?
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Kokaloo on Thu, 18 March 2021, 18:10:33
Sorry for the lack of the communication in a few hours. I had been sleeping after posting the IC because KR has different time line.
I saw the many comments about this set, specially related to 'DSS Hand work'.

As I have some language barriers, I can't comment with long writing, but I can tell that I had a plan to run the SA Handarbeit already August 2020 and I have contacted and discussed with Drop from last December.

This doesn't explain you denying permission for someone to run a set based on the old board, much like you're doing. You can not claim ownership of the colorway used from an old board and thus other people should be allowed to run sets in the same regard. Just because your English isn't good doesn't give you the excuse to improperly communicate your lack of ownership over this theme.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Hedgey on Thu, 18 March 2021, 18:13:23
Sorry for the lack of the communication in a few hours. I had been sleeping after posting the IC because KR has different time line.
I saw the many comments about this set, specially related to 'DSS Hand work'.

As I have some language barriers, I can't comment with long writing, but I can tell that I had a plan to run the SA Handarbeit already August 2020 and I have contacted and discussed with Drop from last December.

This doesn't explain you denying permission for someone to run a set based on the old board, much like you're doing. You can not claim ownership of the colorway used from an old board and thus other people should be allowed to run sets in the same regard. Just because your English isn't good doesn't give you the excuse to improperly communicate your lack of ownership over this theme.

I'd argue that this thread is great evidence to throw at Melissa over at SP that he doesn't own the colorway, and therefore DSS Hand Work should be allowed to run as it was intended..
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Ustinj on Thu, 18 March 2021, 18:13:42
Not to mention the fact that you're proposing both the GMK Handarbeit R2 as well as this SA set within the same week, it seems a bit greedy. especially keeping in mind what kokaloo pointed out - you don't own the colorway
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: factoryofidols on Thu, 18 March 2021, 18:18:16
Sorry for the lack of the communication in a few hours. I had been sleeping after posting the IC because KR has different time line.
I saw the many comments about this set, specially related to 'DSS Hand work'.

As I have some language barriers, I can't comment with long writing, but I can tell that I had a plan to run the SA Handarbeit already August 2020 and I have contacted and discussed with Drop from last December.

It doesn’t matter what you planned to run, you don’t own the rights to run this set, you didn’t create it and it was WRONG to tell SP that the DSS set couldn’t be run.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: dededecline on Thu, 18 March 2021, 18:37:20
Sorry for the lack of the communication in a few hours. I had been sleeping after posting the IC because KR has different time line.
I saw the many comments about this set, specially related to 'DSS Hand work'.

As I have some language barriers, I can't comment with long writing, but I can tell that I had a plan to run the SA Handarbeit already August 2020 and I have contacted and discussed with Drop from last December.

I'm currently thinking about running every vintage colorway that hasn't been run before. Just so y'all know I have dibs for IC's I'll post months for now.

Ive actually ruined this joke because by posting it publicly I've given more intention than you did.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: TheBlackHammer on Thu, 18 March 2021, 18:38:39
Sorry for the lack of the communication in a few hours. I had been sleeping after posting the IC because KR has different time line.
I saw the many comments about this set, specially related to 'DSS Hand work'.

As I have some language barriers, I can't comment with long writing, but I can tell that I had a plan to run the SA Handarbeit already August 2020 and I have contacted and discussed with Drop from last December.
Completely understand that English is not the first language and it may be difficult to communicate. That does not mean there should be no communication whatsoever. I tried several times and several ways to communicate with you. I tried messaging you on geekhack multiple times. I tried messaging you through the previous vendors of gmk handarbeit. You did not respond. The only time you responded was when you denied me even having the ability to get a quote for my set based on the notion that you “own the design” which has been pointed out to be a flat out lie. The color orientation as well as the styling was taken directly from a cherry board that was designed to show what cherry was capable of and shown off at trade shows. If anything I was paying homage to that board and had nothing to do with your set. Not only did I change the modifiers. I used completely different colors. I went out of my way to order SP color chips and use completely stock colors from SP to come “close” to the original handarbeit cherry colors. If anything my set was more original than this. From what it seems and from how you are acting, you are gatekeeping the colors and saying you created them when that is simply not true at all. Obviously I have respect for creators what design sets even if they are taken from something else, but this is completely wrong, dishonest, and distasteful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: machine yearning on Thu, 18 March 2021, 19:10:23
This strikes me as the kind of petty selfishness of a child who won't let his sister play with his toys, even though he's not using it. There's no 40s kit here. The DSS 40s set would not overlap with this market at all. "Mine mine mine!"

쪼잔하고 이기적이야. 어린애처럼 "내꺼야!!" 라고 하는 것과 같아.

This kind of cash grab makes a bad name for our community

Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Little4Real on Thu, 18 March 2021, 20:47:31
I really hope this is boycotted
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Faceman76 on Thu, 18 March 2021, 20:52:30
Sorry for the lack of the communication in a few hours. I had been sleeping after posting the IC because KR has different time line.
I saw the many comments about this set, specially related to 'DSS Hand work'.

As I have some language barriers, I can't comment with long writing, but I can tell that I had a plan to run the SA Handarbeit already August 2020 and I have contacted and discussed with Drop from last December.
Your English appears to be just fine, stop with the excuses. 

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: eniigma on Thu, 18 March 2021, 21:03:56
Seems wrong of this to be run in SA - ruins the 'OG' charm of it.

Also, two ICs of essentially the same set in a week?  :confused:
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: iinko_mk on Thu, 18 March 2021, 21:40:50
you have been reading for very long traveler, here, have a seat and take a break. I'm sure the convo only progresses from here
(https://i.imgur.com/mvho3f3.gif)
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: NoxNoxNox on Thu, 18 March 2021, 21:56:00
Please consider mod tilde.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: yoniwolf1202 on Thu, 18 March 2021, 22:01:30
Please consider mod tilde.
Please consider not listening to this man.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: NathanAlphaMan on Thu, 18 March 2021, 22:02:43
Please consider mod tilde.
Please consider not listening to this man.

(https://media.tenor.com/images/e0d60fb5a3ecd8e21841a35e7aa35526/tenor.gif)
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Hedgey on Thu, 18 March 2021, 22:18:33
This strikes me as the kind of petty selfishness of a child who won't let his sister play with his toys, even though he's not using it. There's no 40s kit here. The DSS 40s set would not overlap with this market at all. "Mine mine mine!"

쪼잔하고 이기적이야. 어린애처럼 "내꺼야!!" 라고 하는 것과 같아.

This kind of cash grab makes a bad name for our community

Doesn't matter now that DSS Hand Work will run in it's original, intended form per Melissa at SP!!

Let's go boys!!

Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Kokaloo on Thu, 18 March 2021, 22:27:58
This strikes me as the kind of petty selfishness of a child who won't let his sister play with his toys, even though he's not using it. There's no 40s kit here. The DSS 40s set would not overlap with this market at all. "Mine mine mine!"

쪼잔하고 이기적이야. 어린애처럼 "내꺼야!!" 라고 하는 것과 같아.

This kind of cash grab makes a bad name for our community

Doesn't matter now that DSS Hand Work will run in it's original, intended form per Melissa at SP!!

Let's go boys!!
LETS
*breathe in*
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Tree_ on Fri, 19 March 2021, 00:04:08
This strikes me as the kind of petty selfishness of a child who won't let his sister play with his toys, even though he's not using it. There's no 40s kit here. The DSS 40s set would not overlap with this market at all. "Mine mine mine!"

쪼잔하고 이기적이야. 어린애처럼 "내꺼야!!" 라고 하는 것과 같아.

This kind of cash grab makes a bad name for our community

Doesn't matter now that DSS Hand Work will run in it's original, intended form per Melissa at SP!!

Let's go boys!!

If this is true, it's the best thing to come out of this thread.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Kokaloo on Fri, 19 March 2021, 00:18:13
This strikes me as the kind of petty selfishness of a child who won't let his sister play with his toys, even though he's not using it. There's no 40s kit here. The DSS 40s set would not overlap with this market at all. "Mine mine mine!"

쪼잔하고 이기적이야. 어린애처럼 "내꺼야!!" 라고 하는 것과 같아.

This kind of cash grab makes a bad name for our community

Doesn't matter now that DSS Hand Work will run in it's original, intended form per Melissa at SP!!

Let's go boys!!

If this is true, it's the best thing to come out of this thread.

(https://i.imgur.com/CMjntux.png)
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Ustinj on Fri, 19 March 2021, 00:20:43
I'm all aboard the DSS Hand Work train even though I prefer cherry profile ..
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: TheBlackHammer on Fri, 19 March 2021, 00:27:36
I'm all aboard the DSS Hand Work train even though I prefer cherry profile ..
Update coming tomorrow! Make sure to keep and eye out on the dss hand work IC page!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Tree_ on Fri, 19 March 2021, 00:28:07
This strikes me as the kind of petty selfishness of a child who won't let his sister play with his toys, even though he's not using it. There's no 40s kit here. The DSS 40s set would not overlap with this market at all. "Mine mine mine!"

쪼잔하고 이기적이야. 어린애처럼 "내꺼야!!" 라고 하는 것과 같아.

This kind of cash grab makes a bad name for our community

Doesn't matter now that DSS Hand Work will run in it's original, intended form per Melissa at SP!!

Let's go boys!!

If this is true, it's the best thing to come out of this thread.

Show Image
(https://i.imgur.com/CMjntux.png)


In for DSS. Thanks Coco!
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: manaorme on Fri, 19 March 2021, 01:14:54
So it looks like everything has solved.
GL for IC/GB
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Jebus on Fri, 19 March 2021, 06:26:11
Why does designing a keycap set nowadays feel like playing a part in a Game of Thrones episode? Except people fight for colors. Wild.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: singabore on Fri, 19 March 2021, 11:57:20
been waiting for this to come to SA.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: litster on Thu, 01 April 2021, 15:39:09
If this was really a faithful recreation of Handarbeit, it would have been made by GMK, not Signature Plastics. What a wasted opportunity to make a truly great keycap set from the by gone days.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Puddsy on Thu, 01 April 2021, 15:52:24
If this was really a faithful recreation of Handarbeit, it would have been made by GMK, not Signature Plastics. What a wasted opportunity to make a truly great keycap set from the by gone days.

litster i don't do well on april fools day
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: Cavemann6 on Thu, 01 April 2021, 17:09:42
i love SA

i dont
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: onestraysheep on Thu, 01 April 2021, 18:28:27
i love SA

i dont
What if I told you cylindrical is gross and spherical is the true path to enlightenment?
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: harlekein on Fri, 02 April 2021, 02:22:10
Just a note that this post needs to go to a different subforum:

https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004 (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004)

Quote
Effective immediately, all IC's that are posted which are intended to be ran via Massdrop are not allowed to be posted in the IC sub-forum.  This includes topics that contain links to vote for a keyset or item through Massdrop.  These topics should be made in the Massdrop sub-forum.  Topics that are made in the IC sub-forum will be moved to the Massdrop sub-forum.

Please use the report feature to let the mod team know of any topics that fit the above rule.  We are seeing more and more 'hype' topics being made in the IC sub-forum that take little to no feedback from members.  That isn't the purpose of this sub-forum, nor the site.  Massdrop has its own discussion medium that can be used to this end.

This decision comes from the entire moderation team and there will be no exceptions to the rule.

This rule was just made up to get rid of Mito. Since then it's been broken and ignored dozens of times by people in close standing with the mods here.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: dvorcol on Sat, 03 April 2021, 00:50:53
Just a note that this post needs to go to a different subforum:

https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004 (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004)

Quote
Effective immediately, all IC's that are posted which are intended to be ran via Massdrop are not allowed to be posted in the IC sub-forum.  This includes topics that contain links to vote for a keyset or item through Massdrop.  These topics should be made in the Massdrop sub-forum.  Topics that are made in the IC sub-forum will be moved to the Massdrop sub-forum.

Please use the report feature to let the mod team know of any topics that fit the above rule.  We are seeing more and more 'hype' topics being made in the IC sub-forum that take little to no feedback from members.  That isn't the purpose of this sub-forum, nor the site.  Massdrop has its own discussion medium that can be used to this end.

This decision comes from the entire moderation team and there will be no exceptions to the rule.

This rule was just made up to get rid of Mito. Since then it's been broken and ignored dozens of times by people in close standing with the mods here.

Also, this Drop-specific rule has been removed:

Just a note that this post needs to go to a different subforum:
More
https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004 (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004)

Quote
Effective immediately, all IC's that are posted which are intended to be ran via Massdrop are not allowed to be posted in the IC sub-forum.  This includes topics that contain links to vote for a keyset or item through Massdrop.  These topics should be made in the Massdrop sub-forum.  Topics that are made in the IC sub-forum will be moved to the Massdrop sub-forum.

Please use the report feature to let the mod team know of any topics that fit the above rule.  We are seeing more and more 'hype' topics being made in the IC sub-forum that take little to no feedback from members.  That isn't the purpose of this sub-forum, nor the site.  Massdrop has its own discussion medium that can be used to this end.

This decision comes from the entire moderation team and there will be no exceptions to the rule.

Appreciate the diligent community policing of these threads (no sarcasm, I realize it may come across that way). The IC rules have been updated to remove this Drop-specific rule, as the community as a whole has shifted since the rule was implemented.

Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: dvorcol on Sat, 03 April 2021, 01:43:57
Everything in the Spacebars kit larger than 1u will be convex, right?  SP now has the tooling, as discussed in SA 8010's GB:

Hi all,

Just popping in here to add a detail I forgot: the 2u, 2.25u, and 2.75u spacebars will be using SP's new convex molds.

As for the first week sales, the graph above represents 3/6 vendors with one of them being outdated. It's a decent start but we could definitely use the community's help to make this set a reality! Please consider SA 8010 :)

Great news.

They already had a convex 3u. And 1.25u, but I think Diatec (Filco) owns that mold.

(https://massdrop-s3.imgix.net/product-images/drop-sa-handarbeit-custom-keycap-set/FP/xDGgvPQBTpGMu3Kx8aOe_4%20-%20SA%20Handarbeit%20-%20Spacebars.png)
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Tue, 06 April 2021, 15:42:43
Just a note that this post needs to go to a different subforum:

https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004 (https://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36672.msg2573004#msg2573004)

Quote
Effective immediately, all IC's that are posted which are intended to be ran via Massdrop are not allowed to be posted in the IC sub-forum.  This includes topics that contain links to vote for a keyset or item through Massdrop.  These topics should be made in the Massdrop sub-forum.  Topics that are made in the IC sub-forum will be moved to the Massdrop sub-forum.

Please use the report feature to let the mod team know of any topics that fit the above rule.  We are seeing more and more 'hype' topics being made in the IC sub-forum that take little to no feedback from members.  That isn't the purpose of this sub-forum, nor the site.  Massdrop has its own discussion medium that can be used to this end.

This decision comes from the entire moderation team and there will be no exceptions to the rule.

This rule was just made up to get rid of Mito. Since then it's been broken and ignored dozens of times by people in close standing with the mods here.

That's simply not true. :confused: Please stop spreading misinformation.

MiTo was given many chances and refused to follow the rules. I think most people would be surprised by just how lenient we are and how many second, third, and fourth chances we give.

The rule in question was created only to limit the number of promotional IC threads that were created. The trend at the time was that all of the ICs posted for Drop buys were essentially ads, while most other threads were not. As was discussed earlier here, things have shifted in a direction such that many more threads are ostensibly ads and it's no longer unique to Drop. Therefore, the rule was dropped to adapt to the changing times.

Not everything is a conspiracy.
Title: Re: [IC] SP SA Handarbeit+
Post by: dvorcol on Fri, 09 April 2021, 00:46:02
Cocobrais confirmed on Drop (https://drop.com/buy/drop-sa-handarbeit-custom-keycap-set/talk/2801980?mode=guest_open) which spacebars will be convex:

SP can manufacture the 2u, 2.25u, 2.75u and 3u Convex Spacebar key with all blanks.
So, spacebar keys in below will be manufactured with convex.
     Flat kit : 2u spacebar
     Spacebar kit : 2u, 2.25u, 2.75u

More
Everything in the Spacebars kit larger than 1u will be convex, right?  SP now has the tooling, as discussed in SA 8010's GB:

Hi all,

Just popping in here to add a detail I forgot: the 2u, 2.25u, and 2.75u spacebars will be using SP's new convex molds.

As for the first week sales, the graph above represents 3/6 vendors with one of them being outdated. It's a decent start but we could definitely use the community's help to make this set a reality! Please consider SA 8010 :)

Great news.

They already had a convex 3u. And 1.25u, but I think Diatec (Filco) owns that mold.

Show Image
(https://massdrop-s3.imgix.net/product-images/drop-sa-handarbeit-custom-keycap-set/FP/xDGgvPQBTpGMu3Kx8aOe_4%20-%20SA%20Handarbeit%20-%20Spacebars.png)

<-- original question