Seagate externals have a good reputation...internals, not so much (mostly 7200.11 series Barracudas it would appear, thanks to the lovely firmware glitches that Seagate never did fully admit the true scope of).
Hitachi, I actually don't think I know someone who had a Hitachi/SimpleTech external and DIDN'T have it fail (in 1-2 years).
I've been very impressed with the performance of the drive in my laptop, but 5 years, even with abuse, is simply too short. I think the heat from it being a 7200RPM drive was a major contributor. Mind, it's still going, but I get occasional quasi-failures so the end is near.
Seagate externals have a good reputation...internals, not so much (mostly 7200.11 series Barracudas it would appear, thanks to the lovely firmware glitches that Seagate never did fully admit the true scope of).
.
WD wins the polls at Xtreme (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=241457) and OCN. (http://www.overclock.net/hard-drives-storage/846139-manufacturer-more-reliable.html)
Never liked them myself.
The Deathstar name only applied to disks with glass platters, they haven't used those in a loooong time. Do some research.
Seagate externals have a good reputation...internals, not so much (mostly 7200.11 series Barracudas it would appear, thanks to the lovely firmware glitches that Seagate never did fully admit the true scope of).
[...]
Avoiding the 1.5TB drives, I've found Seagate to be the most reliable of all the brands of drives I've used.
Current ones are metal.
While there are two types of substrate: aluminum and glass, glass substrate has higher heat-resistance and shock-resistance and is more suitable for high-density storage media than aluminum substrate. For these reasons, glass substrate is rapidly gaining popularity, being employed in notebook computers and various digital home appliances.
Nooooooo...I have three 7200.11 1.5TB Barracudas... :eek:
kishy, timw4mail, what problems actually appeared on those drives?
Bad sectors, data corruption?
Thankfully I have the drives on a raid5 array, but this is frightening news.
Need bigger hammer.Show Image(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=10098&d=1274248827)
They had firmware issues. If they are working fine for you now, I wouldn't worry too much about it.
Seconding timw, the issues were not mechanical in nature. They were firmware glitches that usually showed up within the first few times using the drive (but exceptions existed...which is what Seagate never admitted, and in fact clearly denied).
Well, the drives have about 6 months of uptime and so far no problems appeared.I've had a drive fail from just about every brand so just remember to keep a backup.
Let's hope they stay that way...
I've always though Seagate and WD were pretty reliable drives, but I guess every brand has its problems.
BlacX Thermaltake Esata. Pop em in like frozen waffles.
IMG]http://lh4.googleusercontent.com/public/oQ_V-ZlHiIBU_IQZRmUIEqM-3_fBFcN_ix-2_bZgRPwo4CnzPQeL3PL2LsTZH5Hs2_fOcN54iYGOsrCeipM2fh1g-0x7jVfqlMLzYXkNigTy555g5prGjf8Xaqmc5X1SGkMUZ1S1C-2rF5rmI6r6oYyGRsWRqeXx3CozqMohCg-bOVObOPmJU-bcBT_hbmR6_fRB[/IMG]
Harddrives are fascinating stuff - especially if you remember the incredibly noisy clunkers that were around in the olden days. A 1997 vintage 7k2 SCSI drive makes quite a racket, and I wouldn't want to have a first-gen 10k screamer.
BlacX Thermaltake Esata. Pop em in like frozen waffles.just get some good temps in your room to keep the drive happyShow Image(http://lh4.googleusercontent.com/public/oQ_V-ZlHiIBU_IQZRmUIEqM-3_fBFcN_ix-2_bZgRPwo4CnzPQeL3PL2LsTZH5Hs2_fOcN54iYGOsrCeipM2fh1g-0x7jVfqlMLzYXkNigTy555g5prGjf8Xaqmc5X1SGkMUZ1S1C-2rF5rmI6r6oYyGRsWRqeXx3CozqMohCg-bOVObOPmJU-bcBT_hbmR6_fRB)