i find more than ever that all the news does is make me depressed or angry and is presented in a manner that is intended to do so. so i'm not going to be the newsreader's ***** anymore.
all the news does is make me depressed or angry and is presented in a manner that is intended to do so.Use your anger, Welly. Reach out with your mind, and find the politician who will actually fix the things that are wrong instead of doing something stupid.
i find more than ever that all the news does is make me depressed or angry and is presented in a manner that is intended to do so. so i'm not going to be the newsreader's ***** anymore.
So in other words you would have taken the blue pill?
Since "42" came up in another thread.I watched the whole BBC miniseries on PBS, but couldn't bring myself to watch the changed version from Hollywood.
You know this Republican resurgence is working in my keyboard favor. Since they believe in the Rich getting Richer and the poor being ignored I'll be able to sell my AAPL for virtually no taxes and buy lots of RealForces and overpriced Comptek2wk NIB IBM minis.
The poor and unemployed can just eat rubber domes.
... racism, segregation ... and gay marriage. All reasons why I do not support their agenda.
in many states they can be denied a job for being gay or denied the ability to rent housing if the landlord doesn't like the fact that they're gay. It would be illegal to deny someone any of these things based on their race or religion.
It's just that I believe that defining "marriage" as a partnership between two men or two women is wrong. Marriage is a partnership between a man and a woman, and that's how it's been throughout history.
Actually, gays are denied equal rights on many fronts,I don't dispute that. But the adjustment to accepting this new frontier of equality is complicated by several factors.
Barack Obama has done more to improve the image and state of the USA than anyone seems to be giving him credit for.
I hope your Elephant team don't get back in because I am enjoying the fact that I like America now.
It's time for concerned Americans to stop the Tea Party, and bring either the Republicans or the Democrats back to the center, so that Americans will have a rational alternative to vote for. Nehemiah Scudder must not win in 2012!
I think Joseph Goebbels would be smiling ear to ear if he was alive today.
If I ignore the bull**** that is considered 'news', I have a more pleasant day.
It's time for concerned Americans to stop the Tea Party, and bring either the Republicans or the Democrats back to the center, so that Americans will have a rational alternative to vote for. Nehemiah Scudder must not win in 2012!
I don't dispute that. But the adjustment to accepting this new frontier of equality is complicated by several factors.
I don't get a voucher if I don't approve of some war or agriculture subsidy or hedge fund bailout.
How exactly has Obama improved the state of the USA?
I don't really watch long posts anymore.
hmm... *idea*
Several states offer vouchers, though I don't see why it's necessary.
I don't really watch long posts anymore.
My Impression was that there have been more Republican presidents so that kind of weights them unfairly and yes I realise you had Lincoln, but you also had Nixon and Reagan so I reckon that cancels them out (StarWars anyone)?
Remember that Obama has had to climb his way out of a monumental **** hole left for him by the previous guy, who you can thank for the current depression the USA is in due to total deregulation of your fiscal system.
Despite this he has still managed to lower your middle income taxes (an overwhelming majority of people, including friends of mine in the States did not realise this until they checked their finances).
The Obamacare plan, so derided in the American conservative press is actually good for your country, yes it is expensive, but the Private Health system you have had for so long is terrible. I work in the Australian Health Care system (in possibly the worst state for public health [NSW]) but I can tell you the training, research and quality of care is excellent. My wife is and Emergency Specialist [what you would call an ER Doctor]. If I had to have an operation, and I was overseas, I would fly home. If you guys gave it a chance you would see that a true public health system can be incredibly beneficial. Its not perfect, but its pretty damn good.
I know some American History, probably not as much as you, but a fair bit. The Republicans of old are not the same as the Republicans of new. The ideas have changed, the rhetoric has increased, the conservatism has become far more extreme. Correct me if I am wrong, but this also applies to the Democrats. They are gradually becoming more conservative also.
The liberal bias in your media is somewhat harder to find than the Fox news stuff, but maybe that's because its more cleverly wrapped in rationality.
I don't really read that one. Politico for me.
interesting that we take for granted the right of parents to hand their children a set of beliefs... any beliefs they wish... and expect the children to be protected from competing sets of beliefs.It is true that children are human beings in their own right, not property.
on this point i think KL and I will disagree ;) Personally i think O is the greatest thing to happen to this nation in a long time, and also I think he's a genuine centrist. Anyone who can piss off both left and right in equal measure as he has, has got to be doing something right.
Remember that Obama has had to climb his way out of a monumental **** hole left for him by the previous guy, who you can thank for the current depression the USA is in due to total deregulation of your fiscal system.
I know some American History, probably not as much as you, but a fair bit. The Republicans of old are not the same as the Republicans of new. The ideas have changed, the rhetoric has increased, the conservatism has become far more extreme. Correct me if I am wrong, but this also applies to the Democrats. They are gradually becoming more conservative also.
The liberal bias in your media is somewhat harder to find than the Fox news stuff, but maybe that's because its more cleverly wrapped in rationality.
and I believe that using a PC with Windows 3.1 is wrong. Get the point?
Hint:
Nobody gives a **** what you believe, and you dont have the right to use your beliefs as a basis for dictating what people can with their own lives in a "free" country.
edit:
Also what everyone else said. Don't ask, don't tell. Yeah, that's fair, and startlingly progressive ... not.
Exactly the same argument applies to you and to me, there is no point in posting what you think because nobody cares. Why post? Why do I post?
Hint: we are all self-centred and like for our opinions to be agreed with; we all have unwarranted self-importance.
congrats for getting the point ... :rolleyes:
Anyway, to go back on topic (why do I ALWAYS have to be the one...) if you don't watch TV news then you'd think our new Speaker of the House was pronounced "Boner".
1) If for nothing else, Obama was/is good for America because he's black (there I said it), just like our very own Angela Merkel was good for Germany cuz she's a woman
The only reason I knew it was pronounced "BAY-ner" is because I heard his name on the news before I saw it on TV. It totally looks like "Boner."
i thought it was hilarious when obama referred to boehner as a 'person of color'.Well, pink is a color. We white guys just never wanted to admit it because we were afraid people would think we were gay.
Sighed and moved on. If thats the 'mood of the electorate', then I blame the electorate.It's all the fault of the mass media!
Also, we have the liberally-biased American media to thank for all the FUD that is spread overseas about Republicans. I'm still amazed when Europeans tell me how horrible they've heard American conservatives are, only later to find out it's mostly bull**** FUD. People who believe hype are the ones who vote for people like Obama. I'm of the impression that when something seems too good to be true, it usually is.
It certainly appears that nothing spread about Republicans by the American media is "FUD" (because the media doesn't create the messages, it just carries them).
Not to mention the countless websites and video clips of specific Republican politicians saying such crap as that they want to repeal bills, shrink government and so forth...
It is people who hold those values that make the rest of the world hate the US, I believe, based on knowing a decent number of people in countries that are not in North America. The beautiful thing about the US is that you're allowed to have those views, and if the US really respected its own little rule about that, it would be understanding of the rest of the world hating those same views...
Am I the only one who sees the striking similarity between these two definitions?No; the American people all recognize that both of the parties have given themselves names which indicate those parties support the beloved American institution of representative democracy. In addition to a "Republican Party" and a "Democratic Party", other political parties seeking a large following might call themselves the "Liberty Party" or the "Freedom Party" in order to appeal to the love of Americans for their freedom.
That is wrong, and too many people think that. Along your line of thinking, a Turkish president would be even better for Germany! A president should be voted on based on their character, views, morals, ethics, etc., NOT based on the color of their skin or whether they're male or female. That is reverse racism and reverse discrimination. They need to be chosen based on whether they are fit for the job at hand!
A president should be voted on based on their character, views, morals, ethics, etc., NOT based on the color of their skin or whether they're male or female.
True, bush secured a lot of oil for the US in the future. More important to ensure ppl can continue with the "american way" of living and don't have to change their energy consumption behavior or how they build their sheds, urm I mean houses, sry, than ensuring that actually everyone has a right and the means to stay healthy, not just a privileged minority.
Don't mention that he send 2 countries into a downward spiral, cost a lot of soldiers their lives in an unnecessary war (well ok, you might see it as a necessity to not reduce your oil consumption) and when it got to the promised rebuilding he "outsourced" that to folks who could actually get it done (namely europeans).
In the end, I think that the American people are disappointed with Obama because they expected a great president. And instead of getting one, all they got was a spoiled wanna-be reality tv star.
i saw an interview with jimmy carter and bill maher and the former pres said that it might actually be good for obama if the gop gets majority (which they have). I think so too, it might let obama grow a pair or grow a spine and get rid of that streak of yellow, he needs to say f this bipartisan stuff and say "my way or oj". (pretty sure the gop never forgot oj!)
he's already invited the repubs to dinner to begin the process of compromise). What is needed is not obama's "spine" -- it was spine that made him invite the exultant repubs to a meeting - rather, what is needed is for the current repubs to grow balls and grow a brain and start focusing on governance rather than mere party politics. Thats where the 'courage' is.
Health care reform, the economic stimulus package and the fair pay act, whether or not you agree with them, were among his promises.
This. He has achieved quite a bit in the last two years. Oh, an you forgot financial industry reform.
Passed, in law, and starting next year. Thanks for coming.
Stock market is up.
That's all I care about.
Ironic that the most successful bailout program in centuries gets such bad press. Almost all of the $700B has been paid back.
Unemployed? Let them eat rubber domes.
http://whatthe****hasobamadonesofar.com/
genius!
That explains the extreme tax hikes and ballooning national debt. Yay?
He invited the repubs to work with him because he knows he's lost the trust of the American people,
bro, someone's feeding you serious misinformation. Obama reduced taxes on 95% of americans, thats just a fact, look it up bro. As for the national debt that bush ballooned with the wrong wars and tax cuts for his wealthy friends, yea, obama inherited it and the usual bush economic disaster as well, and yea, its going to take a while to right the ship while fighting the real enemy in the right war this time in afghanistan. Unlike bush however, obama's plans all take eventual deficit reduction into account even in the healthcare plan...
bro you gotta stop believing everything glenn beck says man.
I think it's ironic that conservatives that complain the most about taxes don't actually seem to pay attention to what they're paying in taxes. The stimulus bill was 1/3 tax CUTS. Among those was a payroll tax credit for 95% of working Americans ($400 for individuals and $800 for couples filing jointly for tax years 2009 and 2010).
The other ironic thing is that people hate the new healthcare program but like all the components of it. Americans are dumb.
Stock market is up.
i have nothing against moderate repubs, but the fact is they are in the extreme minority in their own party right now, a party which has seriously gone off the rails into looney tunes land.
http://whatthe****hasobamadonesofar.com/
Obama didn't inherit anything worse from Bush than Bush inherited from Clinton. And it all goes down the line. THAT'S a fact.
Oh I KNOW what I'm paying in taxes. Nearly 5% of my paycheck goes to taxes. That's insane. If there's been a cut for somebody, I didn't get it.
Well, no. During Clinton's 8 years the US enjoyed a period of the longest economic boom in its history.
Granted all can't be attributed to Clinton (http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/were_clintons_policies_responsible_for_the_1990s.html)and by the time he left and Bush took over the economy was already in recession, but still.
Clinton also was the one who originally bombed Afghanistan and got the taliban pissed at us. Osama Bin Laden was also leading the taliban at the time and was directly involved. So, look at what Clinton left Bush to deal with.
Well, no. The Taliban started harboring Bin Laden at that time (1998) and it is he who the attacks were targeted against. Bin Laden was involved in the Africa embassy bombings earlier that year. As soon as the taliban started harboring Bin Laden it was always the case that the US would have to get involved with them.
Clinton also was the one who originally bombed Afghanistan and got the taliban pissed at us.
Osama Bin Laden was also leading the taliban at the time and was directly involved. So, look at what Clinton left Bush to deal with.
again, on basic facts, this is plain wrong. Bin laden was never in the taliban, he was in al queda and these are two separate organizations. The taliban harbored bin laden for a while, but bin laden wasnt "in" the taliban. THese are totally different organizations, with different roles, different locations, different sources of funding, and even different political ambitions.
Still, the facts still stand - Clinton bombed Afghanitstan and got Al Quaeda pissed at us.
Again, Al Quaeda bombed two US embassies in 1998 (https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/1998_U.S._embassy_bombings).
That was why the US was looking for him and the reason for those bombings of Afghanistan. The bombings certainly did not make Al Quaeda angry at the US, they had just bombed two US embassies, kinda late to get angry after that don't you think :)
Um, it is off-topic. If you don't want to get caught up in it, don't post (see: ripster). Check out the "Religion" thread. The OP of that one posted all of about 5 times in that epic troll-fest.
How many times did Welly post in that one?
How many times did Welly post in that one?
you can make this about me bro, if you cant some up with the facts to support your positions... ;P
does it matter there, Mr. 1000+ Post Since July(Including a BS thread about that achievement)?
Yea but I think they were mostly pissed about civilian causalities. But who knows really.
"Osama bin Laden jokingly told militants at the al-Jihad merger that only a few camels and chickens had died.[16]"
Clinton bombs people and they get mad at us, bad.
Bush bombs people and they get mad at us, good.
And in the meantime we're all caught up in another one of Welly's troll-baiting threads. Welly needs to be banned from Off-Topic thread creation, IMHO.
I think Welly just uses some kinda provolone or chedder that you can't resist that he uses for his bait in his mousetraps.
Bush succeeded in at least taking Saddam out of power. That's a win in my book.
...even tho saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. got it. its a win anyway!
I'm a winner!!!
Rewriting history now? What was the official reason for invading Iraq as reported by the US government on several occasions again?
He's definitely been linked with Al Qaeda.
Hanging is a pretty grisly way to go. Lot's of physics involved.
Chinese method of just shooting people is much more straightforward.
*sigh*. bro, he's definitely been *unlinked* from al queda, even the bush administration acknowledged that. jesus christ.
Captured Iraqi documents have uncovered evidence that links the regime of Saddam Hussein to regional and global terrorism, including a variety of revolutionary, liberation, nationalist, and Islamic terrorist organizations. While these documents do not reveal direct coordination and assistance between the Saddam regime and the al Qaeda network, they do indicate that Saddam was willing to use, albeit cautiously, operatives affiliated with al Qaeda as long as Saddam could have these terrorist–operatives monitored closely. Because Saddam’s security organizations and Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network operated with similar aims (at least in the short term), considerable overlap was inevitable when monitoring, contacting, financing, and training the same outside groups. This created both the appearance of and, in some ways, a “de facto” link between the organizations. At times, these organizations would work together in pursuit of shared goals but still maintain their autonomy and independence because of innate caution and mutual distrust. Though the execution of Iraqi terror plots was not always successful, evidence shows that Saddam’s use of terrorist tactics and his support for terrorist groups remained strong up until the collapse of the regime.
Not according to this document (http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/iraqi/index.html).
Bush: No saddam links to 9/11. (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/11/18/iraq/main584234.shtml)
oops.
I'll repeat what I said: I truly am not that concerned about him. I know he is on the run. I was concerned about him when he had taken over a country. I was concerned about the fact that he was basically running Afghanistan and calling the shots for the Taliban.
But, you know, once we set out the policy and started executing the plan, he became -- we shoved him out more and more on the margins.
He has no place to train his al Qaeda killers anymore...
We can kill foreigners. It's in the constitution somewhere.
The war in Iraq did exactly what many of us who opposed it thought it would; it distracted us from crushing the organization that attacked us.
Hahaha, ok, I laughed, I'll admit.
thats the bottom line. and as a result we lost everything, from the goodwill of the world, to the initiative we had in the war on terror.
Ok you guys are right. I see your logic and proof (sarcasm). I surrender.
NOT! :D
;) I wouldnt expect you to surrender to logic and proof :P
Nevertheless, here's my take on it: Saddam was just another dictator. Small fish. The US had no trouble with their diplomatic relations to him until he was shoehorned into invading Kuwait.
The US had no trouble either sponsoring the same muslim fighters that they now fight, back when they had someone else to send them against.
That "War on terror" is a bogus concept is, I think, fairly established.
I think TV's big role in the modern world is to reaffirm a reality to the individual that he might otherwise find ridiculous.
Did you guys hear about this?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/05/nbc-anchorman-suspended-donating-democrats (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/05/nbc-anchorman-suspended-donating-democrats)
Crazy...I'm glad that MSNBC did the right thing here.
He was suspended for funding politicians, not for his beliefs.
he made contributions to candidates. so what? its perfectly legal. I dont know the details in his case, but if thats all it was, then I dont get it.
Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan have donated to candidates in recent years, but they never got suspended from MSNBC. Oh wait, they donated to Republicans, so it's just fine.
It's Phil Donahue all over again. I wonder if they'll tap Michael Savage again.
and they quote even bill kristol saying olberman's firing was 'ludricrous'.
Fox News bobble-heads would get fired for not raising money for Republicans.
He was suspended for funding politicians, not for his beliefs.Reading the Guardian article, though, it's clear that donating to a politician isn't a corrupt act - so the only legitimate reason for reacting to a donation is that it gives an appearance that a journalist is biased.
Still, I don't fault liberals for wanting to take the high road, even if Republicans don't.
That's not ludicrous.
THIS is ludicrous.Show Image(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c2/Ludacris_2008.jpg/220px-Ludacris_2008.jpg)
what do you mean 'shoehorned'? Saddam claimed kuwait for decades and finally decided to act on it. He didnt believe (because of his own faulty intelligence) that the US or anyone else would ultimately intervene. and he was locked in an ongoing war-to-the-death with iran at the time.
this is true. Doesnt mean we have no values; It does mean we can be very shortsighted from time to time and we pay the price if we dont learn from our mistakes. As depicted pretty well in that movie (what was it called? charlie?) our mistake in afghanistan was not following thru with real support for democratic education once the soviets were defeated. It was an enormous mistake and a real missed opportunity. We're great at intervention, we're really bad at follow-through.
its not a 'bogus concept'. Terrorism is all too real. The issue is how best to tackle it, and its on that score that bush fell flat on his face taking most of america with him.
no, tv's role is to make a profit for its parent company. it does that job the best that it can. When media corporations get too big they dont let diversity thrive, and thats when the dissemination of information -- so vital to a healthy democracy -- suffers. Its not rocket science. The problem isnt corporations as such, its monopolies and oligopolies as such. (And the lack of originality or creativity or courage, things today's media desperately needs.)
Kuwait was an important ally in Iraq's war against Iran. Iraq had a heavy debt to Kuwait and tried to get out of it by OPEC production cuts. Kuwait would not pardon the debt, and instead increased their own oil production to counter the decrease. Iraq economy collapsed, and it was called an act of aggression. Kuwait didn't want to back down against an enemy already putting up troops on the borders. This is seen by some as hint that Kuwait had US backing in a plan to lure Iraq into the offense.
What I do know is that it wouldn't hurt for America to turn their eyes inward for a change.
Terrorists following a single ideology can come from many different countries that may all be at peace with their neighbors and the rest of the world. You do not wage war on individuals, that is what's bogus about it. You're right, this only boils down to how you tackle the issue. But a nonsensical expression like this can only have been made up by people who have no clue how to tackle the issue because they haven't grasped how terrorism works. And the result of this was an unimaginative, traditional war that completely ignored the issue.
I find information suffers much earlier. When a guy who is involved with a show or the news goes: "We'll get more people with car crashes." Doesn't need a monopoly to smell the best bait.
Doesn't need a genius to figure out in what direction this pushes people mentally.
well, i'm just saying I dont think there's a conspiracy to make people dumb. I think the effect is an outcome of other factors (like too much or too little economic competition) rather than individuals engaging in conspiracy, whcih is what this sounds like a bit.
That we do all this **** to ourselves just out of stupidity and greed is kind of putting humankind in a worse light than option A. ;)
Actually it'll get better once women take control.
Nancy Pelosi announces she'll become House Minority Leader.
Republicans hate strong women so this should result in much lulz.
Republicans are a "do nothing" party. It's going to be embarassing in two years when their only accomplishment will be sending more jobs overseas and extending tax credits to the wealthy.
Vote for Joad Cressbeckler!
He is someone we all can believe in...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iqktCdX0hs
...that we know of. He's definitely been linked with Al Qaeda.
i mean any news. I read about current events in snippets online, like the AP ticker on yahoo or something,, but thats about it.
i find more than ever that all the news does is make me depressed or angry and is presented in a manner that is intended to do so. so i'm not going to be the newsreader's ***** anymore.
Use your anger, Welly. Reach out with your mind, and find the politician who will actually fix the things that are wrong instead of doing something stupid.
I think what the U.S. needs is a Populist politician, who, like a Democrat, will cut imports and immigration to put people back to work, and like a Republican, will keep the nation's defenses strong.
But sinister forces are working so that what the nation will get, instead, as the answer to its discontent will be Sarah Palin.
It's time for concerned Americans to stop the Tea Party, and bring either the Republicans or the Democrats back to the center, so that Americans will have a rational alternative to vote for. Nehemiah Scudder must not win in 2012!
it took only a few actual days of attending my "News history, analysis and research" class (basic req. course for the major) before becoming totally disillusioned with the entire concept.
The coursework involved actually having to watch several news programs on daily basis, and after knowing what I then knew about what went into them before airing, I couldn't stomach it any longer.
Dropped both the course and the major in under two weeks and switched to advertising and PR, which actually seemed like the more honest career with more integrity after learning the truth about "News."
The thing that I appreciate most about Emerson is what I learned about the Mass Media as a whole and the way communication is so affected by the relationship between the message and the messenger. I realize that my perception of the world would not likely be the same had I not attended Emerson. Now that I think of it, too, it actually helps me understand why the country is so out of whack considering that most people did NOT get that sort of information from the schools they attended.
My mom didn't really value the idea of education for the sake of itself, but she wanted me to attend college so that I could "get a job." If I had known that when I was applying to schools, I would have not even bothered until I had some Idea of what kind of job I wanted to get, possibly even saved her $100,000 in tuition in the process. I just assumed it was expected of me, the same way that graduation from high school was. I don't know if a degree in "Communication Studies" is useful for a damn thing as far as making me more employable, but I will say that the practical knowledge if afforded me is something I consider invaluable now.
lol, i'm a huge fan of joad cressbeckler! :) I keep hoping the onion gives him his own regular show already.
(saw him on a different ad the other day, for a make-your-own business cards site.)
fs=1&hl=en_US">[/youtube]
fs=1&hl=en_US">[/youtube]
i mean any news. I read about current events in snippets online, like the AP ticker on yahoo or something,, but thats about it.
i find more than ever that all the news does is make me depressed or angry and is presented in a manner that is intended to do so. so i'm not going to be the newsreader's ***** anymore.
Just because it's on the internet does not mean that it is 100% true.What about NATURE'S 4 CORNER HARMONIC SIMULTANEOUS 4-DAY TIME CUBE (http://www.timecube.com/)?
I try to tell that to my relatives and to my friends, that they should take what is being said on the news with a grain of salt, because these "news sellers" need to create sensation, otherwise their "news" would be boring, and no one will be interested. For example, we will never see something like: "Here's a small town in Canada. As you can see, it's business as usual, nothing extraordinary is happening today."
What I find more annoying is that some people believe everything they see on the internet. Just because it's on the internet does not mean that it is 100% true.
The way this is achieved is YOUR ATTENTION is SOLD to advertisers.
In the end you are a lump of biological cells bonded by chemistry for the sole purpose of consuming resources for driving the economy.
Get over it.
When Katie Couric puts on glasses I think she gets even Hawter.Show Image(http://swannellc.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/img-article-kurtz-couric_142300686009.jpg?w=387&h=302)
Not funny dude. Her husband died of colon cancer and she's been very vocal for the cause.
In fact she went on the next day and did the news after her husband died.
News media pretty much created the swine flu, which was so rampant and detrimental to the pork industry they lobbied the media to call it H1N1. And in the end? nothing.Usually, even when an influenza epidemic is so severe that many people die, they're usually the ill and elderly.
My wife made me look at the inside of Dr. Oz's colon.
Welly, you ever been in a Turkish prison? I have and you don't want to drop the soap.
link is very much on topic.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_theticket/20101115/pl_yblog_theticket/almost-5-million-people-watched-sarah-palins-alaska
5million viewers? biggest premiere for TLC? that's a lot of GOP looking at a milf.
its the same reason people slow down to watch a car wreck... (or glenn beck)
While I personally think Mormonism is a bit strange, calling someone a carwreck for their religious beliefs is pretty dumb.
Anyway, if Glenn Beck is a carwreck, he's laughing about it all the way to the bizank.
I always get a good laugh when people are talking to me about how being against radical Islam is "racist". But then I ask them about how they felt about the Holocaust and they talk all about how Anti-Semitism is so bad.
Doesn't it stink talking politics with idiots?
I definitely would not call Glenn Beck an idiot though. Even if you don't agree with his political view point, I would recommend reading about the "Restoring Honor" rally he and a few others hosted in Washington, D. C. a few months ago.
Today I Learned that George Bush listens to Kanye West and that he doesn't like black people.
I think 'sitting bull' is a great name.
if i were born native american i'd have been called 'watches too much tv'.
EIBM/MW would be '****ting Bull' ...
Boy, I had to go downstairs last night my wife was so pissed.
Republicans are good sheep. Sheep don't like change. Change you can believe in.
I think 'sitting bull' is a great name.
if i were born native american i'd have been called 'watches too much tv'.
i expected him to be all gangsta and go "ok this how we do this bit## up in here".
But at the House party don't expect Boehner to have a boner over Pelosi. All those tanning booth sessions means he can't get it up anymore.
For those of you that don't follow the news Pelosi and Boehner were elected House party leaders.
But at the House party don't expect Boehner to have a boner over Pelosi. All those tanning booth sessions means he can't get it up anymore.
In the end you are a lump of biological cells bonded by chemistry for the sole purpose of consuming resources for driving the economy.
Get over it.
When Katie Couric puts on glasses I think she gets even Hawter.Show Image(http://swannellc.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/img-article-kurtz-couric_142300686009.jpg?w=387&h=302)