-
Do you see a young or old woman?
It took me a while to see the young lady.
(http://www.thebrainteasers.com/brainteasers/images/youngoldwoman.jpg)
(http://www.coolopticalillusions.com/illusions/youngladyoldlady.gif)
-
I always see the young lady first. :)
-
This (http://www.gaiser.org/MrAngry.jpg) one is so much cooler.
-
BLOODY HELL i couldn't even see the old lady, does this mean something?
-
I have to look for the old woman. I seen the young lady first.
-
Do you see a young or old woman?
It took me a while to see the young lady.
Show Image
(http://www.thebrainteasers.com/brainteasers/images/youngoldwoman.jpg)
That picture makes me want to kiss her neck!
Obviously a young 18 year old virgin girl ...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... at the moment when the image was drawn.
Now, she is 97 years old, has got 3 children, 5 grand children and 7 grand-grand children....
-
That picture makes me wat to kiss her neck!
Obviously a young 18 year old virgin girl ...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
... at the moment when the image was drawn.
Now, she is 97 years old, has got 3 children, 5 grand children and 7 grand-grand children....
Thanks for killing my boner
-
Do you see a young or old woman?
It took me a while to see the young lady.[/IMG]
Both, young first. I'd be curious to do a correlation between this and the ability to see the big picture (old) vs focused on details (young).
And not to biased the results I'd ask "what do you see?" Without suggesting there is two images. Because if you do, it is clear that we will put extra attention to see both. (I did... Saw the young, then asked my self now where is the old? - Ah ok...)
According to my "assumption" you'd be a big picture guy.
And I'd be more in the details.
Cool thread
-
I see boobs. I ALWAYS see boobs.
I see a zebra dog licking feet.
I also see a old guy who didn't get enough milk when he was young.
-
This one is also good.
Can you spot the hidden tiger on the picture?
Please don’t reveal the secret, so other users can have fun spotting it too.
(http://www.moillusions.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/Hidden-Tiger-Optical-Illusion.jpg)
-
Found it LoL. Good one indeed!
-
Show Image
(http://www.moillusions.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/Hidden-Tiger-Optical-Illusion.jpg)
Found it!
It is the one behind the right bamboo bush!
Right?
-
Nope.
-
Few years back, there was those stereoscopic posters. After staring at them for a while you either ended up by puking or see a 3D picture.
I'll try to find a couples of decent ones for PC viewing.
-
Nope.
"Please don’t reveal the secret, so other users can have fun spotting it too."
Thank God the troller didn't solve it. So other users can still have fun finding it.
-
Oh those always make my eyes hurt.
-
Maybe stereoscopic was not the right term. Because all the ones I found were 2 images side by side. What I have in mind is a single image revealing a 3D picture hidden in them.
EDIT: found the proper terminology - Hidden Stereograms aka magic eye 3d
This one is easy to spot... What do you see?
(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=16663&stc=1&d=1302010206)
-
Hidden stereograms could be yet another cool "human intervention" to separate bots from trolls.
-
What does it mean if you see a cloud of bombs?
-
What do you see?
I see tears in my eyes.
-
What does it mean if you see a cloud of bombs?
It means you didn't stare at it long enough. There is a single solid subject in the middle.
-
I see tears in my eyes.
LoL.
HINT - Try to blur your vision (make it out of focus)
I also find it easier if I slowly move my head left and right couple of inches at a 1hz frequency.
The picture is composed of two overlapping images. The idea is to desynch each of your eyes and assign one image to one and the other image to the other. When you succeed... Wham! You see 3D. The brain of ours is an amazing piece of processing power.
-
I heard they use the same technique for photoreading.
-
I heard they use the same technique for photoreading.
Yet another word I didn't know. After Googlereading it I can't decide if photoreading is a scam or not. I bend on the scam side.
-
What do you see in this picture?
(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=16664&stc=1&d=1302014827)
-
For my life I cannot understand why they don't do those stereograms inverted. It's like a million times easier to cross eyes than parallelizise them =P
-
For my life I cannot understand why they don't do those stereograms inverted. It's like a million times easier to cross eyes than parallelizise them =P
Interesting - I never tried to rotate them 90 degrees
-
Yet another word I didn't know. After Googlereading it I can't decide if photoreading is a scam or not. I bend on the scam side.
Yeah, I'm sceptical as well.
However Steve Pavlina promotes it (http://www.stevepavlina.com/photoreading/), and he is a definitely a good guy.
-
I always see those stereograms as objects that are carved out of the surface, like it's a mold used with plaster or something like that. Most people I talk to say they see the object coming out of the surface, like the plaster object that came out of the mold.
I'm not sure if that means I'm a psychopath or what...
-
I always see those stereograms as objects that are carved out of the surface, like it's a mold used with plaster or something like that. Most people I talk to say they see the object coming out of the surface, like the plaster object that came out of the mold.
Technically they are both the same. So you are as right as the others.
I don't think this is a half empty (pessimistic) or half full (optimistic) conclusion.
What do you see here: (Rorschach Test images)
(http://www.rontronik.com/blog/gb/crazyvid.jpg)
-
I always see those stereograms as objects that are carved out of the surface, like it's a mold used with plaster or something like that. Most people I talk to say they see the object coming out of the surface, like the plaster object that came out of the mold.
I'm not sure if that means I'm a psychopath or what...
That means you are crossing your eyes instead of "looking behind" the surface as you are supposed to.
-
This one is funny.
(http://www.moillusions.com/wp-content/uploads/i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb234/vurdlak8/illusions/5820.jpg)
-
That means you are crossing your eyes instead of "looking behind" the surface as you are supposed to.
That's exactly what I thought I was supposed to do, cross my eyes....hmmm....
A new challenge!
-
That's exactly what I thought I was supposed to do, cross my eyes....hmmm....
A new challenge!
Marty Feldman - Reportedly the one who invented the stereograms
(http://www.uglymales.com/wc/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/marty-feldman1.jpg)
-
[size=12]What do you see?[/size]
(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=16667&stc=1&d=1302025042)
-
I see a bunch of chr #13
-
I see.
-
I see.
This one took me a while to figure out...
The out come is very funny.
(http://www.spiritofthestairwell.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/magic-eye.gif)
No joke, this is a real stereogram.
-
I see.
me too!
This one took me a while to figure out...
The out come is very funny.
Show Image
(http://www.spiritofthestairwell.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/magic-eye.gif)
No joke, this is a real stereogram.
More like a modern, abstract poem!
-
"me too! More like a modern, abstract poem!"
You got me on that one... Found it my accident. Funny too :-)
Stop wasting my time, get a life. :biggrin:
-
Sorry 7bit you had me on that one too. ;-)
Show Image
(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=16667&stc=1&d=1302025042)
-
Took me like 3 minutes to see the old one, lol!
-
This one is easy to spot... What do you see?
My eyesight must be getting really bad, I used to get these easily when I was a kid, but this one took ages. Is it more difficult to get them on an LCD screen? iirc printed ones behind glass are easier to see because you can focus on a reflection.
I half expected that after all the effort it would just be something stupid like a cock & balls, or say "you're a twat" in bold letters, but it's good :smile:
-
Technically they are both the same. So you are as right as the others.
I don't think this is a half empty (pessimistic) or half full (optimistic) conclusion.
What do you see here: (Rorschach Test images)
Show Image
(http://www.rontronik.com/blog/gb/crazyvid.jpg)
Two men with large hats playing chess with only four pieces.
-
...still a cloud of noobs...
...oh wait, nevermind. She got up.
-
I don't see the old woman at all.
-
I see boobs. I ALWAYS see boobs.
Show Image
(http://canv.as/ugc/processed/b5ebb24636e04449eba92e6d39dba1e437794183.png)
I love this picture. Reminds me of a long lost girl from the past.
-
Lol, I didn't even see that pic. Pretty funny though I don't get the expectation part lol.
-
The old woman's mouth is the young woman's necklace. The old woman's nose is the young woman's chin.
-
Wow, THANKS for giving it away!
-
The guessing time has expired. Sorry this is my topic.