I had a CLC member come in the other day with a van load of computer stuff to donate. We usually don’t accept donations, but somehow this one slipped through. The stuff he brought in was cutting edge in 1996, but most of it is too dated for us to do anything with. But there was one thing that we could have some fun with. . .
My boss has hinted several times that he would appreciate a bigger monitor. So, yesterday while he was at lunch, we replaced his 17″ CRT with the 32″ Gateway CRT that was brought in with the donated equipment.Show Image(https://banderson.files.wordpress.com/2006/12/image_223.jpg)
On a side note, if anyone is interested in a 1996 32″ Gateway Destination monitor capable of a whopping 600 x 800 resolution at 60Hz, let me know. I’ve also got a Pentium 1 Gateway Destination desktop PC with a TV tuner card, CD-ROM, 3 1/2″ floppy and a 5 1/4″ floppy drive complete with wireless keyboard and remote control.
You ARE MW.
Stop pretending.
Good point.
Plus I think you are allowed by the judge to be near children.
I dunno the age the judge specified. I didn't read the court order.
So they even then made TVs in monitors... I'm so sad with todays 16:9 ways...
OK, now I'm officially bored with this thread. However I would have titled it Nightmare, not wet dream.
I'm getting hard.
That would be pretty nice if it ran a half decent resolution. One of my friends had a big CRT too that he once ran at something like 2560x1920 although he did complain that it was pretty hard to read things then as it made text tiny.Might have been FW900, even when comparing today's screens it had fantastic specifications such as 1920 × 1200 @85hz and 2304 × 1440 @80hz
Might have been FW900, even when comparing today's screens it had fantastic specifications such as 1920 × 1200 @85hz and 2304 × 1440 @80hz
What happened to Input Nirvana's post?
(Attachment) 28840[/ATTACH]
What happened to Input Nirvana's post?
(Attachment) 28840[/ATTACH]
Want. My eyes demand satisfaction.
SYNOPSIS:
EI: says something stupid about weird dreams, an odd add to a worthless post
IN: makes comment not directed at EI
EI: makes direct insult (and incorrect) rebuttal to IN
IN: makes direct counter insult to EI
EI: runs to iMav like the crying **** snitch that EI is and reports
IN gets banned, which is fine
I never reported anything...
Anyone who takes offense on the internet is a sour puss.