it's immoral to buy a keyboard to flip it.Then I guess I'm an immoral person. I made $200+ off flipping SSKs. I would never condemn anyone for doing the same. I just wish I got into the business when Model Ms and other boards were a dime a dozen.
it's immoral to buy a keyboard to flip it.
Show Image(http://i.imgur.com/oeUe8.png)
Am I doing it right?
it's immoral to buy a keyboard to flip it.(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
I get it: He's flipping it like a table.except accepting keyboard speculators into the market does nothing but artificially inflate demand, driving prices up. i guess i'll wait for the giant keyboard bubble to burst when the speculators can't sell their 5 keyboards to 1 person.
We discussed the ethics of intellectual property in Philosophy club tonight, and we determined that it's really no unethical to do that (based on what one considers true ownership). Just like I'd prefer to sell keyboards strictly to end-users, I have no trouble with others profiting.
It's all based on ripster's favourite graph :p If the person flipping can sell it, then it's worth that much. If not, then it isn't. I always look out for a good deal, but I only flip things at small profit to help my friends who need it.
Like, I'll get one of them to sell a good acquisition of mine at a profit, and split the profits with them. I do this when they don't have a job. I get the bonus of not having to do any work, and he gets to eat this week. Everyone profits.
So, I don't really see how keyboard speculation can drive up demand. If anything, they increase supply, as rare keyboards often become easier to find through their efforts.haha
except accepting keyboard speculators into the market does nothing but artificially inflate demand, driving prices up. i guess i'll wait for the giant keyboard bubble to burst when the speculators can't sell their 5 keyboards to 1 person.
Now, my demand for good keyboards hasn't changed, though my abilities to buy one have.
So, I don't really see how keyboard speculation can drive up demand.
If anything, they increase supply, as rare keyboards often become easier to find through their efforts.
This is where I think that graph sort of fails, though.
I think there is a big difference between those that discover otherwise destroyed goods (such as at yard sales, charity shops ect) and those that buy keyboards that are already "discovered" trying to make a profit. The first group increases supply, and is basicly the source of most of the market whereas the second does not and only raises prices significantly for users.
I don't like Elitekeyboards raising ClickClack prices, keeping the profits, and calling it socialism.
Not really. Capitalists make profits. Socialists distribute wealth to the people.