geekhack
geekhack Community => Keyboards => Topic started by: Chris_F on Sun, 05 August 2012, 18:42:47
-
I've been working on my own keyboard layout and am interested to hear what you think, especially if you have experience with alternate layouts.
Edit: Seems people were getting confused by some of the non-relevant details of my first image so I have uploaded a better image.
-
Well, it's got a Windows key, so it looks good to me!
-
Well, it's got a Windows key, so it looks good to me!
Actually, that is just the Windows on-screen keyboard. I'm using that to display the layout of the letter keys.
-
Oh I see, is this new layout based on any research, or common mistakes, or anything else?
I know you're just looking at key layout but IMO fn and right shift could use better placement :P
-
Oh I see, is this new layout based on any research, or common mistakes, or anything else?
I sort of based it off of other alternate layouts, specifically, mirrored Dvorak, Colemak and QGMLWY. I sort of mixed them a bit and made some modifications.
I know you're just looking at key layout but IMO fn and right shift could use better placement :P
Again, I only used the Windows on-screen keyboard for an easy illustration. The placement of special keys in this particular
program is unchangeable and completely irrelevant to my layout. I have uploaded a less confusing image.
-
I really like it! I see the Dvorak influence on the home row, but the RL placements are better. U doesn't really "need" to be on the homerow, etc.
Things I don't like: Stupid punctuation placement. That was one of the best features of Dvorak, and one of the most overlooked layout changes. Punctuation is used a lot, it has no purpose on the bottom row (All except for the semicolon; no-one uses that anymore anyway.)
Normally I'd also complain about the close-to-qwerty ZXCV placement (Being "like" a flawed layout is one of the main reasons I didn't do colemak), but it's a real balance between utility with stupid-windows-shortcuts, and utility of actually having well placed keys.
(I put cut/copy/paste/etc. on programmable keys above the function row)
So, it's rather good overall. I haven't looked into what digraphs are easy/hard with it, but overall it shows a much better design than some I've seen.
Have you run it through a layout tester?
-
I originally had punctuation on the top right, but I actually got worse results, so I put them back on the bottom. I may try moving them again. As for any other QWERTY similarities, they are not on purpose. The placement of Z, V, C, X only seemed natural. It's a happy coincidence that they remain close enough to be used for common shortcuts.
http://www.andong.co.uk/dvorak/ (http://www.andong.co.uk/dvorak/)
This is the site I used to test my layout. It seems to score higher than Dvorak, Colemak and QGMLWY.
-
Anyone happen to know of some good software for testing out keyboard layouts? Preferably something with source and written in C or C++.