Like I said, I appreciate the obsession. He knows what he likes. I can respect that.
See, when I read stuff like that I am sometimes list in that all I know of a a Lisp is that it is a speech impediment. I guess I'm not as geeky as I should be. I'll work on that.
Huh, I remember when me and my friend spent over 10 minutes trying to find the power button on the eMacs; obviously we didn't want to ask the teacher because that would just be going too low.
I have one suggestion: power buttons should be on the front (http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Where_is_the_power_button_on_an_eMac) (crazy hey?). Heck, they could have made the apple logo into a power button, that would actually be kind of cool, they could make it glow too.
And that link no longer seems to work.
EIBM...sorry to do this but I've just facepalmed at you.
Show Image(http://www.scienceblogs.de/astrodicticum-simplex/2009/05/07/double-facepalm.jpg)
He's not the first person to make that mistake, but I find it completely baffling that someone who actually read the thread would realize that it's not about Apple. Is the Apple hatred so strong that every time something that looks Mac related is posted, vitriol has to be spewed?
And multiple mentions of "It's for Lisp machines" and a picture of an obviously 70/80s keyboard convinced you that this thread about an eMac?THEY'RE EVERYWHERE:
If we're resurrecting threads from 2007, I might as well chime in and state that the model F AT is Emacs-friendly.
From the sounds of it, the Filco would be a much nicer keyboard for typing than that linear Symbolics one.
If we're resurrecting threads from 2007, I might as well chime in and state that the model F AT is Emacs-friendly.
Right, I just want to get a Symbolics keyboard while they're still relatively available. I've already got a 104-key Filco w/Blues, and *love* it. After using an MX11800 and a Ricercar SPOS, I finally bit the bullet and ordered the Tenkeyless on Friday.
Here (http://www.symbolics-dks.com/) or here (http://www.asl.dsl.pipex.com/symbolics/).