I'd say perhaps the 1800 layout, because it has everything you need in a compact design. I was never a fan of 60% until I tried a HHKB. The HHKB layout is awesome.
I'd say perhaps the 1800 layout, because it has everything you need in a compact design. I was never a fan of 60% until I tried a HHKB. The HHKB layout is awesome.
Was wondering what this layout was... For some reason, I can't make myself used full sized anymore... even trying full sized cherry's.
I'd say perhaps the 1800 layout, because it has everything you need in a compact design. I was never a fan of 60% until I tried a HHKB. The HHKB layout is awesome.
Was wondering what this layout was... For some reason, I can't make myself used full sized anymore... even trying full sized cherry's.
Here's an image from my dear friend, flynn:Show Image(http://i.imgur.com/gzwuh.jpg)
Would it be wrong to piggy-back off this layout thread?autohotkey can handle this if you find a good one.
I have to do a lot of subscripts and superscripts, and that is like my least favorite series of keystrokes in all of the universe. Would it be easier to reprogram the keys required to sub/super or is there a layout you can suggest that would make ctrl+shift+= less gut wrenching?
"man up and deal with it" is also an acceptable answer :p
ErgoGP
More is more.
I'm not even claiming that I use those extra keys. I don't. But I like knowing they're there for me.
I don't see the attraction to tiny 60% layouts. Granted, I've never tried one, but I imagine a tighter layout is harder to use.
My favorite layout is the Model F, 122-key Super Attack Fortress, Deathstar-sized layout.
More is more.
I'm not even claiming that I use those extra keys. I don't. But I like knowing they're there for me.
I don't see the attraction to tiny 60% layouts. Granted, I've never tried one, but I imagine a tighter layout is harder to use.