whiskerBox reminded me of some skeletor keys I made long ago.
When I saw his post in my other thread I honestly remembered making them as he
had colored them. However it looks like I had tried to capture the more traditional look of
the character through my design.
It is really close to the click clack design is why they are getting all upset.
this is also for profit so the member needs to become a vendor.
It is really close to the click clack design is why they are getting all upset.
this is also for profit so the member needs to become a vendor.
Inb4 sh!tstorm
so if I understand all the TC correctly he needs to:
repost this in the GB section
charge 15 a pop and write up a moq so everyone needs to buy 100+ to get it to the $4 price range
or get a vendor tag
just curious as to his options
so if I understand all the TC correctly he needs to:
repost this in the GB section
charge 15 a pop and write up a moq so everyone needs to buy 100+ to get it to the $4 price range
or get a vendor tag
just curious as to his options
so basically if you are 'crafting' anything you need to make it a GB or get a Vendor tag?
classifieds is for something already created you are selling or want to buy, or if you are trolling waters?
I think the problem occurs when he's making a profit, if he said "These cost me $4 to make [Look these are my costs]" then you'd be fine. He is acting as a vendor without being a vendor.
You guys do know what the skull is right...?QuotewhiskerBox reminded me of some skeletor keys I made long ago.
When I saw his post in my other thread I honestly remembered making them as he
had colored them. However it looks like I had tried to capture the more traditional look of
the character through my design.Show Image(http://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=24466.0;attach=1317;image)Show Image(http://fc03.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2012/097/7/a/skeletor__s_face_by_mikebock-d4mmy0y.jpg)
And the design resembling CC Skull design?
We know what the skull is, my point is, the design is a direct ripoff.
And the design resembling CC Skull design?Dude, this is a keychain not a keycap. It's not as if he's trying to replicate CC skulls (something I don't think anyone could do) Hoasican liked CCs skulls so much he turned them into something new. Unless CC himself has a problem I don't see a problem personally.
And the design resembling CC Skull design?Dude, this is a keychain not a keycap. Hoasican liked CCs skulls so much he turned them into something new. I don't see what everyones problem is..
And the design resembling CC Skull design?Dude, this is a keychain not a keycap. Hoasican liked CCs skulls so much he turned them into something new. I don't see what everyones problem is..
And the design resembling CC Skull design?Dude, this is a keychain not a keycap. Hoasican liked CCs skulls so much he turned them into something new. I don't see what everyones problem is..
in the interest of having a constructive conversation about copyright infringement...
monster energy makes energy drinks with there logo on it.
if you made a monster energy drink t-shirt you would be breaking there copyright.
yes you didn't make another energy drink called monster energy drink to confuse customers and scam off them. but you would be infringing on the copyright no less.
this is why ebay is constantly scanned for fake rolex's, nike's, tiffany jewelry, sports apparel, you name it.
look at the post above you.
He shouldn't have to file copyrights/trademarks as members should have respect for his products.
He can file for pre-dated copyrights/trademarks based on his posts and other stuff he probably already has.
I think I worded my post wrong. Edited.And the design resembling CC Skull design?Dude, this is a keychain not a keycap. Hoasican liked CCs skulls so much he turned them into something new. I don't see what everyones problem is..
http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=24463.msg667991#msg667991
Time after time, sad that the 4grabs has 57k views, but the FAQ barely has 4
I wonder why all the elitists who care about clacks are the ones getting hurt (while on CC himself should be angry).
Honestly I don't even think OP owns a clack, and this is far from reality copyright infringement. There is no case, as the clack itself is copyrighted not the overall picture. You cannot recreate a clickclack, but the image is still there. Sure, it might not have been the best thing to do, but I'm sure if clackfactory was against this and messaged him, he would change the design. I mean just the concept in itself sells.
I wonder why all the elitists who care about clacks are the ones getting hurt (while on CC himself should be angry).
Honestly I don't even think OP owns a clack, and this is far from reality copyright infringement. There is no case, as the clack itself is copyrighted not the overall picture. You cannot recreate a clickclack, but the image is still there. Sure, it might not have been the best thing to do, but I'm sure if clackfactory was against this and messaged him, he would change the design. I mean just the concept in itself sells.
I did receive a PM from clickclack after I apologized to him for adding the mockups for the ceamocap with the CC skull. He appreciated the gesture but made it clear that his design may not be used for reproduction in any manner.
look at the post above you.
He shouldn't have to file copyrights/trademarks as members should have respect for his products.
He can file for pre-dated copyrights/trademarks based on his posts and other stuff he probably already has.
Are you seriously knocking people for copying things? Hmmm... stones... glass houses... etc...
look at the post above you.
He shouldn't have to file copyrights/trademarks as members should have respect for his products.
He can file for pre-dated copyrights/trademarks based on his posts and other stuff he probably already has.
Are you seriously knocking people for copying things? Hmmm... stones... glass houses... etc...
If you feel that strongly about my work then post in my thread and we can discuss the usage of the russian gasmask design.
look at the post above you.
He shouldn't have to file copyrights/trademarks as members should have respect for his products.
He can file for pre-dated copyrights/trademarks based on his posts and other stuff he probably already has.
Are you seriously knocking people for copying things? Hmmm... stones... glass houses... etc...
If you feel that strongly about my work then post in my thread and we can discuss the usage of the russian gasmask design.
If it was actually your work, yeah. But it isn't. So don't go knocking people for doing things that you yourself are doing.
you are right. I am guilty.
you are right. I am guilty.
That's all that was required. Quit bagging on this dude for it. Get the point now?
you are right. I am guilty.
That's all that was required. Quit bagging on this dude for it. Get the point now?
3 posts in and you're already fast making friends, well done!
you are right. I am guilty.
That's all that was required. Quit bagging on this dude for it. Get the point now?
3 posts in and you're already fast making friends, well done!
He's just high.
Wht the **** is Domo guilty of? CC's keys are a representation of te character Skeletor. Domo's are a representation of a Pyro. Srsly.
If by representation, you mean complete copy, then yes, it's definitely a representation exactly duplicating a toy he used to make the mold because he has amazing sculpting skills (http://geekhack.org/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=42336.0;attach=33179;image).