geekhack

geekhack Community => Other Geeky Stuff => Topic started by: Michael on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:06:30

Title: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Michael on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:06:30
Yes.


http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/01/06/sideshow-and-hot-toys-unveil-the-dark-knight-armory-and-figurines (http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/01/06/sideshow-and-hot-toys-unveil-the-dark-knight-armory-and-figurines)


(http://i.imgur.com/JPGFDf5.jpg)

Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: demik on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:07:05
only if i can see it go up a stripper's......... nvm.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: lcs on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:09:39
You gotta admit that it is a *really* cool Bat toy.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: sth on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:13:05
(http://www.quickmeme.com/img/b6/b6c2aaa5be70badc9361f6b53803ba13796c674eab7958d6206a1d602b42b071.jpg)
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: vun on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:13:24
Nah, I'd be more interested in the Batman villains, they're usually more interesting than Batman.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: kmiller8 on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:14:46
I'll stick with the life-sized busts tyvm

http://www.sideshowtoy.com/collectibles/dc-comics-batman-modern-age-sideshow-collectibles-4001122/
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Wildcard on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:20:44
That's awesome sth,

That is some serious detail. I've seen a lot of high quality action figures coming out by some of these companies.

(http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/192dn3peajljnjpg/original.jpg)
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: noisyturtle on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:35:04
I've seen this toy in person, it is super bad ass. That being said, I wouldn't pay over $250 for it.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Novus on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:40:15
Is this a chick magnet or does this send off the wrong signals?
...
Why'd I even ask
More
(http://i.imgur.com/k1M4YEj.jpg)
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: dustinhxc on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:42:37
Yes.


http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/01/06/sideshow-and-hot-toys-unveil-the-dark-knight-armory-and-figurines (http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/01/06/sideshow-and-hot-toys-unveil-the-dark-knight-armory-and-figurines)


Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/JPGFDf5.jpg)


Wow.. the opportunities are endless with that thing.  :thumb:
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Novus on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:43:33
Yes.


http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/01/06/sideshow-and-hot-toys-unveil-the-dark-knight-armory-and-figurines (http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/01/06/sideshow-and-hot-toys-unveil-the-dark-knight-armory-and-figurines)


Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/JPGFDf5.jpg)


Wow.. the opportunities are endless with that thing.  :thumb:

WELL
That certainly changes thing.
HELL YES.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Tetsuo on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:49:21
Is this a chick magnet or does this send off the wrong signals?
...
Why'd I even ask
More
Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/k1M4YEj.jpg)

Not if shes a die hard batman fan, caching.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Halverson on Mon, 06 January 2014, 19:50:09
Short and long answer, no. And no I didn't look at what it is/was.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Mon, 06 January 2014, 20:03:31
I am batman.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 06 January 2014, 20:05:10
do kids still play with these? i'd think they'd probably have more fun and rather have a playstation with 5x games for the same $600
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: kolonelkadat on Mon, 06 January 2014, 20:08:23
how do comic book losers have so much disposable income?
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: eddie on Mon, 06 January 2014, 20:09:15
No I wouldn't, not even if I had 10 billion dollars. Nothing against batman that just seems ridiculous. :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 06 January 2014, 20:11:26
how do comic book losers have so much disposable income?

Top-Ramen... i'm telling you...
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Michael on Mon, 06 January 2014, 20:16:43
how do comic book losers have so much disposable income?


I am not into comics as much as I am collectible figures. You gotta respect the quality and effort put into these.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: fohat.digs on Mon, 06 January 2014, 20:19:43
What about this masterpiece?

Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 06 January 2014, 21:11:51
What about this masterpiece?



$9999
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Novus on Mon, 06 January 2014, 21:48:57
I derped.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Novus on Mon, 06 January 2014, 21:51:02
What about this masterpiece?



What about this masterpiece?



$9999

What about this masterpiece?



$9999

Only if it comes with the UN kool aid Chemistry set.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: kolonelkadat on Tue, 07 January 2014, 06:50:54
how do comic book losers have so much disposable income?
I am not into comics as much as I am collectible figures. You gotta respect the quality and effort put into these.

yeah, I can dig that. I just mean in general. million dollar comic books, 1000 dollar convention tickets, 1000 dollar "hero" dolls... i dunno. maybe my imagination is fallacious. maybe  they dont all run around making it rain in comic book stores. im pretty sure they do though and id like to know how.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Alessandro on Tue, 07 January 2014, 06:59:24
If I had that kind of income, I would, absolutely.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: ynrozturk on Tue, 07 January 2014, 12:07:40
Short answer - not a chance in hell.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: ideus on Tue, 07 January 2014, 12:12:16
That's awesome sth,

That is some serious detail. I've seen a lot of high quality action figures coming out by some of these companies.

Show Image
(http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/192dn3peajljnjpg/original.jpg)



Do you have a link for this young Jobs figurine?
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: kmiller8 on Tue, 07 January 2014, 12:14:23
Do you have a link for this young Jobs figurine?

The image clearly says coming soon in the upper right.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: ideus on Tue, 07 January 2014, 12:18:32
Do you have a link for this young Jobs figurine?

The image clearly says coming soon in the upper right.


It is available here (http://www.legendtoys.jp/order.html).
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Skull_Angel on Tue, 07 January 2014, 12:20:49
Only if Christian Bale wasn't the new Batman...
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Tue, 07 January 2014, 12:22:57
Only if Christian Bale wasn't the new Batman...

ben affleck is the 'new' batman
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Skull_Angel on Tue, 07 January 2014, 12:38:57
Only if Christian Bale wasn't the new Batman...

ben affleck is the 'new' batman

Wat? The first one was so bad that the only reason I saw the second were the comments on how Heath Ledger made such a great Joker (he really did), didn't even both to watch trailers for the most recent one because of Bale (was it even worth watching?).
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: tjcaustin on Tue, 07 January 2014, 13:19:44
Only if Christian Bale wasn't the new Batman...

ben affleck is the 'new' batman

Wat? The first one was so bad that the only reason I saw the second were the comments on how Heath Ledger made such a great Joker (he really did), didn't even both to watch trailers for the most recent one because of Bale (was it even worth watching?).

To anyone without bias, yes.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Michael on Tue, 07 January 2014, 14:39:08
Only if Ben Affleck wasn't the new Batman...




fixed that for you
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Michael on Tue, 07 January 2014, 14:40:37
Only if Christian Bale wasn't the new Batman...

ben affleck is the 'new' batman

Wat? The first one was so bad that the only reason I saw the second were the comments on how Heath Ledger made such a great Joker (he really did), didn't even both to watch trailers for the most recent one because of Bale (was it even worth watching?).


Because you personally don't like Christian Bale, you missed out on the best Batman movies of all time. Too bad for you.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Pacifist on Tue, 07 January 2014, 15:14:52
while ben affleck is awesome af in other movies he doesn't make a good batman
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Tue, 07 January 2014, 15:42:07
while ben affleck is awesome af in other movies he doesn't make a good batman

Have you seen ben affleck be batman in a movie?
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Michael on Tue, 07 January 2014, 16:03:06
while ben affleck is awesome af in other movies he doesn't make a good batman

Have you seen ben affleck be batman in a movie?


Well duh, Ray. I mean he clearly stated that he doesn't.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Tue, 07 January 2014, 16:04:57
while ben affleck is awesome af in other movies he doesn't make a good batman

Have you seen ben affleck be batman in a movie?


Well duh, Ray. I mean he clearly stated that he doesn't.

but...but....he said he doesn't make a good batman.....how can he know....until he sees it??? :eek:
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Michael on Tue, 07 January 2014, 16:21:48
while ben affleck is awesome af in other movies he doesn't make a good batman

Have you seen ben affleck be batman in a movie?


Well duh, Ray. I mean he clearly stated that he doesn't.

but...but....he said he doesn't make a good batman.....how can he know....until he sees it??? :o


I mean - clearly he already knows he doesn't make a good Batman, which could only mean he HAS seen him in a Batman movie.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Tue, 07 January 2014, 16:22:37
while ben affleck is awesome af in other movies he doesn't make a good batman

Have you seen ben affleck be batman in a movie?


Well duh, Ray. I mean he clearly stated that he doesn't.

but...but....he said he doesn't make a good batman.....how can he know....until he sees it??? :o


I mean - clearly he already knows he doesn't make a good Batman, which could only mean he HAS seen him in a Batman movie.

wow....pacifist is michael bay
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Pacifist on Tue, 07 January 2014, 16:24:08
his acting style is different
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Tue, 07 January 2014, 16:28:06
his acting style is different

Well it was quite a few years ago so you probably missed it being like what 2 or 3?

But he was in a movie called daredevil, it wasn't a blockbuster but he can do batman, he won't be christian bale, but he can do it.

Christian Bales advice to ben affleck

""The only thing I said to him is just make sure he can take a piss without anyone having to help him. Because it's a little bit humiliating, at least what I went through, when you have to have someone help you out of the costume. That was my main piece of advice for him.""
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Skull_Angel on Tue, 07 January 2014, 16:50:50
Only if Christian Bale wasn't the new Batman...

ben affleck is the 'new' batman

Wat? The first one was so bad that the only reason I saw the second were the comments on how Heath Ledger made such a great Joker (he really did), didn't even both to watch trailers for the most recent one because of Bale (was it even worth watching?).


Because you personally don't like Christian Bale, you missed out on the best Batman movies of all time. Too bad for you.

Ahhaha, I see what you did there.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Wildcard on Tue, 07 January 2014, 21:23:56
Only if Christian Bale wasn't the new Batman...

ben affleck is the 'new' batman

Wat? The first one was so bad that the only reason I saw the second were the comments on how Heath Ledger made such a great Joker (he really did), didn't even both to watch trailers for the most recent one because of Bale (was it even worth watching?).

I feel sad for you. I'm going to watch batman begins tonight in your memory :(
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 07 January 2014, 21:27:08
Only if Christian Bale wasn't the new Batman...

ben affleck is the 'new' batman

Wat? The first one was so bad that the only reason I saw the second were the comments on how Heath Ledger made such a great Joker (he really did), didn't even both to watch trailers for the most recent one because of Bale (was it even worth watching?).

I feel sad for you. I'm going to watch batman begins tonight in your memory :(

I think the Chris B Batman series are just aight... they're not good/ not bad...  I don't think he's a very believable batman....

He's also way too skinny to be batman.. 
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Wildcard on Tue, 07 January 2014, 21:32:08
Could he have done better, maybe, did his voice get more annoying as the trilogy progressed, definitely.

Regardless I think he did a great job playing a billionaire vigilante. And did find most of his acting spot on for the Batman role.

Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox was perfect.

The Dark Night Rises will forever be the best Batman ever in my mind. Batman Begins is a close second.

Also, Katie Holmes not being in the other movies almost ruined it for me. Stupid Tom Cruise.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 07 January 2014, 21:36:28
Could he have done better, maybe, did his voice get more annoying as the trilogy progressed, definitely.

Regardless I think he did a great job playing a billionaire vigilante. And did find most of his acting spot on for the Batman role.

Also, Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox was perfect.

I don't think Morgan Freeman was a good choice for Lucius Fox..

Morgan Freeman is more famous than Lucius Fox..

in the MOVIE,  the scenario was more along the lines of    Lucius Fox became Morgan Freeman, rather than Morgan Freeman became Lucius Fox..

This is with respect to the story, the movie itself is fine.. but it did break the original character..


SAME with batman...   BATMAN is supposed to be the PEAK of human conditioning and physiology...  Christian bale looks more like a junky who has successfully completely rehab...  good for him... works ok for people who don't really care about details...

But... again... Very UNLIKE the specifications set forth by the comic book.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: cinnamoncider on Tue, 07 January 2014, 21:38:32
My heart stopped for a moment. OH GOD YES! I WOULD PAY FOR THOSE!
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Wildcard on Tue, 07 January 2014, 21:42:15
Could he have done better, maybe, did his voice get more annoying as the trilogy progressed, definitely.

Regardless I think he did a great job playing a billionaire vigilante. And did find most of his acting spot on for the Batman role.

Also, Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox was perfect.

I don't think Morgan Freeman was a good choice for Lucius Fox..

Morgan Freeman is more famous than Lucius Fox..

in the MOVIE,  the scenario was more along the lines of    Lucius Fox became Morgan Freeman, rather than Morgan Freeman became Lucius Fox..

This is with respect to the story, the movie itself is fine.. but it did break the original character..


SAME with batman...   BATMAN is supposed to be the PEAK of human conditioning and physiology...  Christian bale looks more like a junky who has successfully completely rehab...  good for him... works ok for people who don't really care about details...

But... again... Very UNLIKE the specifications set forth by the comic book.

It's an original trilogy, and a
break from the prior Batman series. I don't know what other character/actor your trying to compare him to, but I really felt Morgan came through as Lucius Fox.

I do agree, it's hard sometimes to see such a famous actor in a new role. I found him very entertaining.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: dimamantra on Tue, 07 January 2014, 21:55:44
I wouldn't buy it but if I did I would have a hard time not playing with it. Need to play with my action figures....I'll stick to other collections.
0__0
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Skull_Angel on Tue, 07 January 2014, 22:58:16
Christian bale looks more like a junky who has successfully completely rehab...  good for him... works ok for people who don't really care about details...

Sounds like one while trying to play the role of Batman too.  :))

Don't get me wrong, he payed Bruce Wayne well enough and I've never had issues with his acting before, but as soon as he opened his mouth as Batman and tried to move around in the suit... Let's just say it was very unsettling and a bit more than awkward from my standpoint; much like watching your niece/nephew try play out the role of a character that you are familiar with, but they have only seen in one commercial.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: demik on Tue, 07 January 2014, 22:59:04
his batman voice was annoying as hell.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Findecanor on Tue, 07 January 2014, 23:52:33
I know people who import and resell and collect Sideshow figurines... That is a deluxe set for sure, and I don't think that it is priced high in comparison to other Sideshow sets where you get only a single figure.

Have you seen ben affleck be batman in a movie?
People judge him for when he played Daredevil in the movie with the same name, in which he sucked really bad.

Christian bale looks more like a junky who has successfully completely rehab...  good for him... works ok for people who don't really care about details...
I think that to become a super-hero, you would have to be a little bit crazy. That's Nolan's style, I suppose.

[Bale's] batman voice was annoying as hell.
I agree to that.

I have yet to see a Batman movie that feels like it does when I read the comics.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: kolonelkadat on Wed, 08 January 2014, 00:15:18
ive only seen two batmen. the ultra gaytardeded one where the joker has a stupid pistol and arnold schwarzenager is like a blue bubble boy.

the other one was admittedly pretty amazing. it was the one with patrick bateman as bat man. he was perfect for the role. I dont think they made a good choice casting the new guy. maybe if batman was a homeless irish dockworker from boston... but hes not.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Comment on Wed, 08 January 2014, 00:27:24
No
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: ynrozturk on Wed, 08 January 2014, 04:43:34
his batman voice was annoying as hell.

Yes, yes it was.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Michael on Wed, 08 January 2014, 05:02:00
his batman voice was annoying as hell.

Yes, yes it was.

Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: fohat.digs on Wed, 08 January 2014, 07:37:26
BATMAN is supposed to be the PEAK of human conditioning and physiology.

This has always been my complaint. With a couple of exceptions, the Batman actors have been small and/or wimpy.

That said, Bale does have an excellent attitude and demeanor for the dark side of the character, but he is also supposed to be a sophisticated playboy which nobody has successfully pulled off.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: ynrozturk on Wed, 08 January 2014, 07:52:23
Not to mention Bane was criminally puny in the movie. In the comics, Bane is freaking massive, almost twice Batman's size.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Wildcard on Wed, 08 January 2014, 08:02:45
Not to mention Bane was criminally puny in the movie. In the comics, Bane is freaking massive, almost twice Batman's size.

I thought they did a good job with Bane. I agree he wasn't as as juiced up as in the comics but I feel like they were trying to make this batman a little more real and in effect less comical.

The actor who played Two Face in the second blew that role.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: ynrozturk on Wed, 08 January 2014, 08:21:48
What bothered me the most that he didn't even have any venom. What's Bane without his venom? I understand that they didn't make him massive because they wanted to make it realistic, but taking away Bane's venom is like taking away Superman's cape.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Wildcard on Wed, 08 January 2014, 10:06:15
What bothered me the most that he didn't even have any venom. What's Bane without his venom? I understand that they didn't make him massive because they wanted to make it realistic, but taking away Bane's venom is like taking away Superman's cape.

Sadly, I think that's the point. All the die hard comic fans want the movie to match the comics but Nolan wanted to make the series much darker and more believable. I know there's still a lot of fiction in the movie, but Nolan's attitude towards CGI (or lack thereof) is a good example of where he tried to impart a sense of realism.

The scene that comes to my mind was in the second movie when Batman tries to cut into that guys van and his saw get's snagged and he slams into that cement column. That didn't go smooth at all did it? It almost seemed like batman, or his tools, failed a little there. These types of event draw the viewer into a world where there is the possibility that Batman might fail. And also what made the second movie so good.

The third movie got a little weird in general, yeah batman can fix a broken back by hanging from a makeshift traction. Or the idea of that odd bomb. It was definitely a little cheesy, but they could have made it a lot less believable.

They didn't make Batman a superhuman hero, just a guy trying to bring justice to a city spiraling towards the darkness.

The themes were as followed:

Batman Begins: Fear
The Dark Knight: Causality with chaos, and the duality of batman
The Dark Knight Rises: Hope

It's definitely going to be different with the new Batman & Superman. I don't really watch Pete Holmes', but this sketch is dead on

Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Wed, 08 January 2014, 11:41:55
What bothered me the most that he didn't even have any venom. What's Bane without his venom? I understand that they didn't make him massive because they wanted to make it realistic, but taking away Bane's venom is like taking away Superman's cape.

Sadly, I think that's the point. All the die hard comic fans want the movie to match the comics but Nolan wanted to make the series much darker and more believable. I know there's still a lot of fiction in the movie, but Nolan's attitude towards CGI (or lack thereof) is a good example of where he tried to impart a sense of realism.

The scene that comes to my mind was in the second movie when Batman tries to cut into that guys van and his saw get's snagged and he slams into that cement column. That didn't go smooth at all did it? It almost seemed like batman, or his tools, failed a little there. These types of event draw the viewer into a world where there is the possibility that Batman might fail. And also what made the second movie so good.

The third movie got a little weird in general, yeah batman can fix a broken back by hanging from a makeshift traction. Or the idea of that odd bomb. It was definitely a little cheesy, but they could have made it a lot less believable.

They didn't make Batman a superhuman hero, just a guy trying to bring justice to a city spiraling towards the darkness.

The themes were as followed:

Batman Begins: Fear
The Dark Knight: Causality with chaos, and the duality of batman
The Dark Knight Rises: Hope

It's definitely going to be different with the new Batman & Superman. I don't really watch Pete Holmes', but this sketch is dead on


I love that video!!
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Michael on Wed, 08 January 2014, 11:53:20
I love how far off topic this has gone... so many rustled jimmies. lol.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Skull_Angel on Wed, 08 January 2014, 12:54:55
I love how far off topic this has gone... so many rustled jimmies. lol.

Bound to happen in a comic book hero thread, haha.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Wed, 08 January 2014, 13:39:54
ive only seen two batmen. the ultra gaytardeded one where the joker has a stupid pistol and arnold schwarzenager is like a blue bubble boy.

the other one was admittedly pretty amazing. it was the one with patrick bateman as bat man. he was perfect for the role. I dont think they made a good choice casting the new guy. maybe if batman was a homeless irish dockworker from boston... but hes not.

Ah.  So you've seen the nipple suit, then.   ;)
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Wildcard on Wed, 08 January 2014, 15:26:55
I love how far off topic this has gone... so many rustled jimmies. lol.

That's because you're the unofficial king of the jimmy rustling jungle :)

ive only seen two batmen. the ultra gaytardeded one where the joker has a stupid pistol and arnold schwarzenager is like a blue bubble boy.

the other one was admittedly pretty amazing. it was the one with patrick bateman as bat man. he was perfect for the role. I dont think they made a good choice casting the new guy. maybe if batman was a homeless irish dockworker from boston... but hes not.

Ah.  So you've seen the nipple suit, then.   ;)

TIL, the Hoff digs Clooney's Nipples...
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Wed, 08 January 2014, 15:50:31
I love how far off topic this has gone... so many rustled jimmies. lol.

That's because you're the unofficial king of the jimmy rustling jungle :)

ive only seen two batmen. the ultra gaytardeded one where the joker has a stupid pistol and arnold schwarzenager is like a blue bubble boy.

the other one was admittedly pretty amazing. it was the one with patrick bateman as bat man. he was perfect for the role. I dont think they made a good choice casting the new guy. maybe if batman was a homeless irish dockworker from boston... but hes not.

Ah.  So you've seen the nipple suit, then.   ;)

TIL, the Hoff digs Clooney's Nipples...

You can't deny the magnificence of the nipple suit.
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Wildcard on Wed, 08 January 2014, 23:25:33
You can't deny the magnificence of the nipple suit.

Archived! (http://i.imgur.com/pDKlejq.jpg)

Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Novus on Wed, 08 January 2014, 23:36:32
You can't deny the magnificence of the nipple suit.

Archived! (http://i.imgur.com/pDKlejq.jpg)

That nipple suit man went on to inspire many great performances though!
Title: Re: Would you pay $624.99 for a Batman Toy?
Post by: Findecanor on Thu, 09 January 2014, 18:52:21
I remember a behind the scenes promo for the movie where even Clooney ridiculed the nipples on the suit.