-
Just curious what GHers get on Myers-Briggs tests. I'm an INFJ. :]
Took this test: http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp
-
Can you link to the test that you did?
-
I shall get the first reply!
I'm ENFP :thumb: happy happy me :p
EDIT: damn! But still the first reply on the test
-
Can you link to the test that you did?
http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp
-
intp apparently
-
So wondering if there's anyone like me on GH ;D
-
I got ISFJ
http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/
-
Introvert(78%) Sensing(12%) Thinking(75%) Judging(11%)
-
INTJ
-
INTJ
Introvert(44%) iNtuitive(38%) Thinking(50%) Judging(22%)
You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (44%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (38%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (50%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)
-
INTJ
Introvert(44%) iNtuitive(38%) Thinking(50%) Judging(22%)
You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (44%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (38%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (50%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)
Thinking vs Feeling 50:50?
You need to try harder, bro :p
You disappoint the Vulcans :))
-
INTJ
Introvert(44%) iNtuitive(38%) Thinking(50%) Judging(22%)
You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (44%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (38%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (50%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)
Thinking vs Feeling 50:50?
You need to try harder, bro :p
You disappoint the Vulcans :))
The way I read it, it's not a 50/50 split, it's a 3/2 ratio between thinking and feeling (3 being 50% more than 2, hence the 50% figure). Perhaps I read it wrong though...?
-
The way I read it, it's not a 50/50 split, it's a 3/2 ratio between thinking and feeling (3 being 50% more than 2, hence the 50% figure). Perhaps I read it wrong though...?
Yes, I believe this is correct since what you quoted shows a "slight preference" as 22%.
-
INTJ
Introvert(44%) iNtuitive(38%) Thinking(50%) Judging(22%)
You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (44%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (38%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (50%)
You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (22%)
Thinking vs Feeling 50:50?
You need to try harder, bro :p
You disappoint the Vulcans :))
The way I read it, it's not a 50/50 split, it's a 3/2 ratio between thinking and feeling (3 being 50% more than 2, hence the 50% figure). Perhaps I read it wrong though...?
The way I read it, it's not a 50/50 split, it's a 3/2 ratio between thinking and feeling (3 being 50% more than 2, hence the 50% figure). Perhaps I read it wrong though...?
Yes, I believe this is correct since what you quoted shows a "slight preference" as 22%.
Ah, oui oui I see. 50% more aye?
-
Another INTJ here.
-
another INTJ here also
-
Your Type
ENTJ
Extravert(22%) iNtuitive(38%) Thinking(50%) Judging(67%)
You have slight preference of Extraversion over Introversion (22%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (38%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (50%)
You have distinctive preference of Judging over Perceiving (67%)
extraversion? bull****!
-
Come on -- we need another ISTJ such as myself!! Why am I always the oddball?! :D
-
ENTP
Extravert(1%) iNtuitive(50%) Thinking(62%) Perceiving(22)%
You have marginal or no preference of Extraversion over Introversion (1%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (50%)
You have distinctive preference of Thinking over Feeling (62%)
You have slight preference of Perceiving over Judging (22%)
-
ENTP
Extravert(1%) iNtuitive(50%) Thinking(62%) Perceiving(22)%
You have marginal or no preference of Extraversion over Introversion (1%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (50%)
You have distinctive preference of Thinking over Feeling (62%)
You have slight preference of Perceiving over Judging (22%)
doesn't count. this test is for humans only.
-
Automatonophobe!
-
INTP
Introvert(33%) iNtuitive(75%) Thinking(62%) Perceiving(11)%
You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (33%)
You have distinctive preference of Intuition over Sensing (75%)
You have distinctive preference of Thinking over Feeling (62%)
You have slight preference of Perceiving over Judging (3%)
-
I took the test a few years ago. It was 40 questions, 10 for each aspect. I scored exactly half and half for the first three categories and leaned toward J vs. P by 1 question. So I guess I don't sway particularly hard to one personality type in particular.
That said, we read through the descriptions, and INTJ seemed like the best fit for me. So I picked that one.
I'm INTJ.
-
hoookay... 100%?
Introvert(100%) iNtuitive(38%) Thinking(88%) Perceiving(22)%
You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (100%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (38%)
You have strong preference of Thinking over Feeling (88%)
You have slight preference of Perceiving over Judging (22%)
-
INTJ here
-
ENTJ
Extravert(44%) iNtuitive(62%) Thinking(38%) Judging(44%)
You have moderate preference of Extraversion over Introversion (44%)
You have distinctive preference of Intuition over Sensing (62%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
You have moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving (44%)
Out of curiosity I looked up the ENTJ personality type.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENTJ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENTJ)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieldmarshal_(Role_Variant) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieldmarshal_(Role_Variant))
That test result seems to be surprisingly accurate, at least for me.
-
hoookay... 100%?
Introvert(100%) iNtuitive(38%) Thinking(88%) Perceiving(22)%
You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (100%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (38%)
You have strong preference of Thinking over Feeling (88%)
You have slight preference of Perceiving over Judging (22%)
Hello fellow INTP,
Wikipedia says 1% to 5% of people are INTP (making it one of the rarest types), including Albert Einstein. I find this quote below from "Portrait of an INTP" (http://www.personalitypage.com/INTP.html) entirely true about myself: INTPs do not like to lead or control people. They're very tolerant and flexible in most situations, unless one of their firmly held beliefs has been violated or challenged, in which case they may take a very rigid stance. The INTP is likely to be very shy when it comes to meeting new people. On the other hand, the INTP is very self-confident and gregarious around people they know well, or when discussing theories which they fully understand.
-
Lol here are some of my favorite quotes from my "Portrait of an INFJ":
In the workplace, the INFJ usually shows up in areas where they can be creative and somewhat independent. They have a natural affinity for art.
INFJs are gentle, caring, complex and highly intuitive individuals. Artistic and creative, they live in a world of hidden meanings and possibilities.
Life is not necessarily easy for the INFJ, but they are capable of great depth of feeling and personal achievement.
Life ain't easy LOLOL.
-
I find this quote below from "Portrait of an INTP" (http://www.personalitypage.com/INTP.html) entirely true about myself: INTPs do not like to lead or control people. They're very tolerant and flexible in most situations, unless one of their firmly held beliefs has been violated or challenged, in which case they may take a very rigid stance. The INTP is likely to be very shy when it comes to meeting new people. On the other hand, the INTP is very self-confident and gregarious around people they know well, or when discussing theories which they fully understand.
Yeah I find that 100% true about myself aswell.
-
ISTP
Famous ISTPs:
U.S. Presidents:
Zachary Taylor
Sir Edmund Hillary, the first man to climb Mt. Everest
Charles Bronson
Tom Cruise
James Dean
Clint Eastwood
Burt Reynolds
Keith Richards
Charlie Yeager
Frank Zappa
-
INTJ - the wiki description was pretty accurate.
-
What does #42 mean?
-
That you feel deadlines are basically a guideline for when it should be finished as opposed to feeling that it absolutely must be finished by the deadline.
-
INTJ
-
That you feel deadlines are basically a guideline for when it should be finished as opposed to feeling that it absolutely must be finished by the deadline.
Oh **** man, I was reading it "Deadliness seems to you to be of relative, rather than absolute, importance" and was pondering the existentialism of the question
It makes much more sense now :-[
Got an ISTJ
-
INTP
Introvert(11%) iNtuitive(62%) Thinking(75%) Perceiving(11)%
You have slight preference of Introversion over Extraversion (11%)
You have distinctive preference of Intuition over Sensing (62%)
You have distinctive preference of Thinking over Feeling (75%)
You have slight preference of Perceiving over Judging (11%)
Isn't basically everyone on the Internet INTP?
-
That you feel deadlines are basically a guideline for when it should be finished as opposed to feeling that it absolutely must be finished by the deadline.
Oh **** man, I was reading it "Deadliness seems to you to be of relative, rather than absolute, importance" and was pondering the existentialism of the question
It makes much more sense now :-[
Got an ISTJ
You made me choke on my coffee with that one. That's funny.
-
INTP; intp.org (http://intp.org/intprofile.html) has a great description.
Online tests suck. I want an EEG device like the one Dario Nardi mentioned here:
-
-INTPs do not like to lead or control people.
-They're very tolerant and flexible in most situations, unless one of their firmly held beliefs has been violated or challenged, in which case they may take a very rigid stance.
-The INTP is likely to be very shy when it comes to meeting new people.
-On the other hand, the INTP is very self-confident and gregarious around people they know well, or when discussing theories which they fully understand.
check.
check.
check.
check.
"Internet anonymity" has an effect on #3 (and related circumstances)
-
INTP
-
INTP; intp.org (http://intp.org/intprofile.html) has a great description.
I've been reading through that link and found something interesting...Certainly explains the appeal INTPs have or computer keyboards.
Because the present is inextricably linked to a sense of the past, INTPs tend to hoard items which help solidify the connection to the past. They find it very difficult to let go of anything they have collected (or indeed created) and which may have a nostalgic meaning...Hence, INTPs are collectors, but they are collectors for whom the objects themselves are only important in so far as they evoke a connection to past events, in so far as they yield a nostalgic mood. The curious problem with any collection of an INTP is that he typically fails to enjoy it in the here and now. Items are stored away so that they can evoke this time at some point in the future, but such a point often never occurs.
The only area in which an INTP will carry out his own ideas to completion is in his personal interest world, where other people are not involved. For this reason, INTPs are fascinated by computer technology as well as the Internet which gives him a voice that he would not otherwise have. Many of the most dedicated Computer Freaks are INTPs. Ultimately, INTPs tend to trust machines more than they trust people and may feel particularly at home in the realm of cybernetics.
-
Why no ENFP! :(
Now I know why I dread to learn or do soldering myself :p
Because ENFPs live in the world of exciting possibilities, the details of everyday life are seen as trivial drudgery. They place no importance on detailed, maintenance-type tasks, and will frequently remain oblivous to these types of concerns. When they do have to perform these tasks, they do not enjoy themselves. This is a challenging area of life for most ENFPs, and can be frustrating for ENFP's family members.
Do I really do this? :cool:
They can talk their way in or out of anything.
-
I'm surprised this thread didn't get alot of flak :p
Normally most people will say something like these questions are too general blah blah blah.
Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test™
Your Type
ENTJ
Extravert(67%) iNtuitive(25%) Thinking(1%) Judging(67%)
You have distinctive preference of Extraversion over Introversion (67%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (25%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling (1%)
You have distinctive preference of Judging over Perceiving (67%)
lalala I'm the executive type.
Actually, while I find myers-briggs interesting I believe external circumstances are a better indicator of how a person will react to a challenge ... I guess this is similar to the underlying philosophy of FAE.
Some of my friends who are really into this ... they'll talk about this **** nonstop if we go out on a small social outing think this webssite (http://www.keys2cognition.com/explore.htm) is more "accurate".
This is what I got:
[attachimg=1]
-
Extrovert(1%) iNtuitive(50%) Thinking(38%) Perceiving(22)%
That 1% extrovert keeps me partying hard!
-
Extrovert(1%) iNtuitive(50%) Thinking(38%) Perceiving(22)%
That 1% extrovert keeps me partying hard!
According to you, I should already be dead tired :p
I think I am too extreme....
ENFP
Extravert(89%) iNtuitive(25%) Feeling(88%) Perceiving(44)%
You have strong preference of Extraversion over Introversion (89%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (25%)
You have strong preference of Feeling over Thinking (88%)
You have moderate preference of Perceiving over Judging (44%)
-
Thought I'd leave this here.
The root of all evil:
(http://i.imgur.com/GJRwa6w.jpg)
-
INFJs also have a deep concern for quality. As will be elaborated later in this profile, they long to see their ideals (Ni) perfectly manifested in physical reality (Se). This need for quality underlies many common INFJ characteristics.
My alibi for korean customs.
-
Thought I'd leave this here.
The root of all evil:
Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/GJRwa6w.jpg)
it seems i've got the right personality type.
-
Thought I'd leave this here.
The root of all evil:
Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/GJRwa6w.jpg)
it seems i've got the right personality type.
ENTJ FTW!
-
ENTJ
Extravert(44%) iNtuitive(75%) Thinking(12%) Judging(56%)
I guess I like to go out and meet people and intuitively think about them, before I judge them. Or something.
-
ENTJ
Extravert(44%) iNtuitive(75%) Thinking(12%) Judging(56%)
I guess I like to go out and meet people and intuitively think about them, before I judge them. Or something.
Haha :))
-
INTJ
-
I guess I like to go out and meet people and intuitively think about them, before I judge them. Or something.
Umm, yeah. MBTI is mostly worthless without basic understanding of cognitive functions or brain activity.
-
Some of my friends who are really into this ... they'll talk about this **** nonstop if we go out on a small social outing think this webssite (http://www.keys2cognition.com/explore.htm (http://www.keys2cognition.com/explore.htm)) is more "accurate".
Thought I'd try this one...
[attachimg=1]
got the same as before :-X
I got ISFJ
-
INTJ
-
Thought I'd leave this here.
The root of all evil:
Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/GJRwa6w.jpg)
Could you please provide the source for this chart?
-
Introvert(100%) iNtuitive(88%) Thinking(100%) Judging(61%)
You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (100%)
You have strong preference of Intuition over Sensing (88%)
You have strong preference of Thinking over Feeling (100%)
You have distinctive preference of Judging over Perceiving (61%)
(http://i.imgur.com/J00re1T.png)
Hm... Maybe I need to get out more.
-
Strange, I got a different result with that one...ENTP.
(http://i.imgur.com/OyX5kHC.png)
-
can't be arsed
probably says a lot
maybe I'll do it later
-
INFJ. Sometimes it's INFP depending on how I feel that day.
-
INFJ. Sometimes it's INFP depending on how I feel that day.
YES ANOTHER INFJ. It's funny because I bought your old keyboard. :thumb:
-
INFJ. Sometimes it's INFP depending on how I feel that day.
YES ANOTHER INFJ. It's funny because I bought your old keyboard. :thumb:
i guess we're pretty rare huh? :llama:
-
INTJ. It's the best.
Surprised no one has posted this yet:
http://geekologie.com/2013/12/star-wars-characters-myers-briggs-person.php
-
INTJ. It's the best.
Surprised no one has posted this yet:
http://geekologie.com/2013/12/star-wars-characters-myers-briggs-person.php
my face when I'm Yoda
(http://media.giphy.com/media/UsmcxQeK7BRBK/giphy.gif)
-
[attachimg=1]
-
INTJ
I[/size]ntrovert(11%) [/color][/size]i[/color][/size]N[/color][/size]tuitive(12%) [/color][/size]T[/color][/size]hinking(12%) [/color][/size]J[/color][/size]udging(67%)[/color][/size][/color]You have slight preference of Introversion over Extraversion (11%)You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)You have slight preference of Thinking over Feeling (12%)You have distinctive preference of Judging over Perceiving (67%)[/size][/font]
-
(http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/21/ygamuvam.jpg)
-
Hehe
-
Show Image
(http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/21/ygamuvam.jpg)
This is perfect. I'm INTJ, and the ironic thing is that for Senior Halloween in high school, I dressed up as Dr. House...
-
Show Image
(http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/21/ygamuvam.jpg)
This is perfect. I'm INTJ, and the ironic thing is that for Senior Halloween in high school, I dressed up as Dr. House...
Everybody lies...
-
Show Image
(http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/21/ygamuvam.jpg)
This is perfect. I'm INTJ, and the ironic thing is that for Senior Halloween in high school, I dressed up as Dr. House...
Everybody lies...
Not Vulcans... (http://geekhack.org/Smileys/solosmileys/tongue.gif)
-
INTJ
-
Show Image
(http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/21/ygamuvam.jpg)
This is perfect. I'm INTJ, and the ironic thing is that for Senior Halloween in high school, I dressed up as Dr. House...
Everybody lies...
Not Vulcans...
Unless logic.
- We all know that's NOT TRUE
-
Favorite INTJs 8) .
-
Show Image
(http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/21/ygamuvam.jpg)
This is perfect. I'm INTJ, and the ironic thing is that for Senior Halloween in high school, I dressed up as Dr. House...
Everybody lies...
Not Vulcans...
Unless logic.
- We all know that's NOT TRUE
I told you, everybody lies.
-
Crowe: "People accuse me of being arrogant all the time. I'm not arrogant, I'm focused."
-
Show Image
(http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/21/ygamuvam.jpg)
This is perfect. I'm INTJ, and the ironic thing is that for Senior Halloween in high school, I dressed up as Dr. House...
Everybody lies...
Not Vulcans...
Unless logic.
- We all know that's NOT TRUE
I told you, everybody lies.
I suppose you're right. Although now that I think about it, an argument between Spock and Dr. House would be EPIC.
-
Stiles: "People confuse bluntness with *****iness." This is hilarious.
-
Show Image
(http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/21/ygamuvam.jpg)
This is perfect. I'm INTJ, and the ironic thing is that for Senior Halloween in high school, I dressed up as Dr. House...
Everybody lies...
Not Vulcans...
Unless logic.
- We all know that's NOT TRUE
I told you, everybody lies.
I suppose you're right. Although now that I think about it, an argument between Spock and Dr. House would be EPIC.
I'd love to see it.
-
Show Image
(http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/21/ygamuvam.jpg)
This is perfect. I'm INTJ, and the ironic thing is that for Senior Halloween in high school, I dressed up as Dr. House...
Everybody lies...
Not Vulcans...
Unless logic.
- We all know that's NOT TRUE
I told you, everybody lies.
Liar paradox.
-
Show Image
(http://img.tapatalk.com/d/14/02/21/ygamuvam.jpg)
This is perfect. I'm INTJ, and the ironic thing is that for Senior Halloween in high school, I dressed up as Dr. House...
Everybody lies...
Not Vulcans...
Unless logic.
- We all know that's NOT TRUE
I told you, everybody lies.
Liar paradox.
-
There are lies, damn lies and then there are statistics.
-
Paradoxes are usually just statements that are wrong.
-
INTP
I much prefer the Keirsey temperment sorter, which places me as an Architect.
http://keirsey.com/4temps/architect.asp
Though, to be honest, I don't put as much stock in these things at all. They may be fine for non self-actualizing people, but for a self-actualizing individual, there really is no personality type. It's just their own, self-made one.
For more info on this, I recommend Wikipedia's article of Dabrowski's theories on positive disintegration. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_disintegration)
I bartle test a diamond.
-
Unless they're temporal paradoxes.
I think the percentages need to be posted.
Saying you're whatever type doesn't really mean all that much since Meyer's Briggs is actually more about how often you tend to use I vs E, N vs S, T vs F, P vs J and establishing your primary, secondary etc Jungian functional preference.
For ENTJ's it would be
Dominant: ET
Auxiliary: IN
Tertiary: ES
Inferior: IF
-
Unless they're temporal paradoxes.
WARNING WARNING WARNING
TEMPORAL RIP DETECTED
ALERT STATUS ALPHA
TEMPORAL DISTORTION IMMINENT
-
ISTJ
Introvert(89%) Sensing(25%) Thinking(1%) Judging(33%)
You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (89%)
You have moderate preference of Sensing over Intuition (25%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling (1%)
You have moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving (33%)
im emo and not smart :(
-
INFP
Introvert(44%) iNtuitive(50%) Feeling(25%) Perceiving(22)%
-
INTP
I much prefer the Keirsey temperment sorter, which places me as an Architect.
http://keirsey.com/4temps/architect.asp (http://keirsey.com/4temps/architect.asp)
Though, to be honest, I don't put as much stock in these things at all. They may be fine for non self-actualizing people, but for a self-actualizing individual, there really is no personality type. It's just their own, self-made one.
For more info on this, I recommend Wikipedia's article of Dabrowski's theories on positive disintegration. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_disintegration)
I bartle test a diamond.
Thank you for the input, it is very interesting.
-
Though, to be honest, I don't put as much stock in these things at all. They may be fine for non self-actualizing people, but for a self-actualizing individual, there really is no personality type. It's just their own, self-made one.
Freshman year in college we had some welcome to college adjustment class. Part of the class was a couple weeks figuring out this Myer Briggs test thing. I failed the class since I laughed at the teacher and ignored the ****.
I think Lonely Island said it best: I ain't gonna be part of your system so I threw it on the ground!
I totally agree with dorkvader. You are who you make yourself to be. Improve yourself. Don't let some bogus test put you in a box. I fit in this catagory: Badass [100%]
-
I just did this…and as expected, it said I was a BTPB
Big Time Playa Boyyyyyyyy
-
I fit in this catagory: New [100%]
FTFY
-
New??? WTF?
-
I just did this…and as expected, it said I was a BTPB
Big Time Playa Boyyyyyyyy
yeeeeeeee
-
INTJ. It's the best.
Surprised no one has posted this yet:
http://geekologie.com/2013/12/star-wars-characters-myers-briggs-person.php
i'm princess leia. oh dear.
-
INTJ. It's the best.
Surprised no one has posted this yet:
http://geekologie.com/2013/12/star-wars-characters-myers-briggs-person.php
i'm princess leia. oh dear.
At least nobody here is Jabba cuz that next part ain't gonna be pleasant :eek:
-
Though, to be honest, I don't put as much stock in these things at all. They may be fine for non self-actualizing people, but for a self-actualizing individual, there really is no personality type. It's just their own, self-made one.
Freshman year in college we had some welcome to college adjustment class. Part of the class was a couple weeks figuring out this Myer Briggs test thing. I failed the class since I laughed at the teacher and ignored the ****.
I think Lonely Island said it best: I ain't gonna be part of your system so I threw it on the ground!
I totally agree with dorkvader. You are who you make yourself to be. Improve yourself. Don't let some bogus test put you in a box. I fit in this catagory: Badass [100%]
MBTI isn't a horoscope. Actually, it appears to correspond quite well to patterns in brain activity. That's where the interesting part happens anyway.
-
Truth be told this test, and many other research products, are part of human kind evolving understanding of ourselves. We may disqualified it / them, as someone did when they were told the earth was not flat but round. Sooner or later the facts will reach us.
-
FWIW:
INTJ
Introvert(78%) iNtuitive(25%) Thinking(25%) Judging(33%)
You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (78%)
You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (25%)
You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (25%)
You have moderate preference of Judging over Perceiving (33%)
Kind of as expected.
-
Welcome to the INTJ club. It seems it is not exclusive at all.
-
ENTJ, not what I expected :o
-
ENTJ, not what I expected :o
Too poor for that income level?
-
The Myers-Briggs ******* Index (http://zombiesintelligently.com/non-fiction/myers-briggs/)
-
ENTJ, not what I expected :o
Too poor for that income level?
Or dumb, or unambitious, or all of the above.
-
Though, to be honest, I don't put as much stock in these things at all. They may be fine for non self-actualizing people, but for a self-actualizing individual, there really is no personality type. It's just their own, self-made one.
Freshman year in college we had some welcome to college adjustment class. Part of the class was a couple weeks figuring out this Myer Briggs test thing. I failed the class since I laughed at the teacher and ignored the ****.
I think Lonely Island said it best: I ain't gonna be part of your system so I threw it on the ground!
I totally agree with dorkvader. You are who you make yourself to be. Improve yourself. Don't let some bogus test put you in a box. I fit in this catagory: Badass [100%]
Yes, I also agree with you guys. These kind of things are simplistic BS obviously.
-
.
-
ENTJ, not what I expected :o
Too poor for that income level?
Or dumb, or unambitious, or all of the above.
oh, i thought you were italian.
-
INFJ is the exclusive one
-
ENTJ, not what I expected :o
Too poor for that income level?
Or dumb, or unambitious, or all of the above.
oh, i thought you were italian.
To you babe, I can be italian just this once.
-
INFJ is the exclusive one
there are a couple that are much less common.
MBTI isn't a horoscope. Actually, it appears to correspond quite well to patterns in brain activity. That's where the interesting part happens anyway.
I agree that it's very useful for understanding a vast majority of people. That said, most people are not self-actualizing (aristotole would not consider them "people" at all). the test starts to break down for some people. (level 4-5 on positive disintegration, or an otherwise self-actualizing individual). Unfortunately such people are so uncommon, it's hard to find enough to study.
-
I find this interesting... much in the way tarot is interesting. It can be amazingly accurate in a broad and general sense... and at the same time utter bull****. In a broad general way, I mostly agree with the personality traits of my type and how they shape behavior patterns I tend to express in my life. But at the same time it's nonsensical to put a lot stock in such things and let it define you.
-
Another INTJ here.
-
INTJ here as well.
-
I just retook this test, with a substantial change in result:
INTP
Introvert(78%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(1%) Perceiving(11%)
You have strong preference of Introversion over Extraversion (78%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling (1%)
You have slight preference of Perceiving over Judging (11%)
Maybe it's time to change my avatar...
-
Well, that's because those tests suck. I usually test as INTJ, although it has nothing to do with reality—I'm a walking INTP stereotype (described here (http://intp.org/intprofile.html) and there (http://oddlydevelopedtypes.com/content/secret-lives-intps)).
...or maybe it's because there's one significant flaw in MBTI, it cuts the curve in the middle, despite the fact that population is best described by something closer to the bell curve, not camel bumps (explanation (http://www.celebritytypes.com/blog/2014/02/mbti-for-skeptics/)).
-
Or a personality change brought on by a significant life event?
Or maybe it's because I quit smoking the wacky...
And it's for that latter reason that I feel this latest result is more accurate.
-
Well, that's because those tests suck. I usually test as INTJ, although it has nothing to do with reality—I'm a walking INTP stereotype (described here (http://intp.org/intprofile.html) and there (http://oddlydevelopedtypes.com/content/secret-lives-intps)).
...or maybe it's because there's one significant flaw in MBTI, it cuts the curve in the middle, despite the fact that population is best described by something closer to the bell curve, not camel bumps (explanation (http://www.celebritytypes.com/blog/2014/02/mbti-for-skeptics/)).
YOU CANT COMPARTMENTALIZE ME!!! I AM AN UNIQUE SNOWFLAKE!!
-
Well, that's because those tests suck. I usually test as INTJ, although it has nothing to do with reality—I'm a walking INTP stereotype (described here (http://intp.org/intprofile.html) and there (http://oddlydevelopedtypes.com/content/secret-lives-intps)).
...or maybe it's because there's one significant flaw in MBTI, it cuts the curve in the middle, despite the fact that population is best described by something closer to the bell curve, not camel bumps (explanation (http://www.celebritytypes.com/blog/2014/02/mbti-for-skeptics/)).
YOU CANT COMPARTMENTALIZE ME!!! I AM AN UNIQUE SNOWFLAKE!!
*a unique
"an" doesn't need to go in front of every vowel, just the ones that sound like vowels...
-
Is it true some employers actually use this system to see if you are a good corporate fit? Seems an arbitrary thing to base that off of. I see some people include their MB score on their resumes too? Is it better to give them a generalized impression of what you might act like, or simply let them draw their own conclusions upon meeting you?
-
Is it true some employers actually use this system to see if you are a good corporate fit? Seems an arbitrary thing to base that off of. I see some people include their MB score on their resumes too? Is it better to give them a generalized impression of what you might act like, or simply let them draw their own conclusions upon meeting you?
I've never heard of this. Seems a little goofy. I'd prefer to base initial screening off of qualifications and then base further screening on interview impressions. But that's just me, and I am neither an employer nor a corporation, so my opinion doesn't mean much here.
-
Is it true some employers actually use this system to see if you are a good corporate fit? Seems an arbitrary thing to base that off of. I see some people include their MB score on their resumes too? Is it better to give them a generalized impression of what you might act like, or simply let them draw their own conclusions upon meeting you?
I've never heard of this. Seems a little goofy. I'd prefer to base initial screening off of qualifications and then base further screening on interview impressions. But that's just me, and I am neither an employer nor a corporation, so my opinion doesn't mean much here.
Actually, I think my company does this. I don't agree with it, tbh. Personality should have no affect on the hiring process.
-
Is it true some employers actually use this system to see if you are a good corporate fit? Seems an arbitrary thing to base that off of. I see some people include their MB score on their resumes too? Is it better to give them a generalized impression of what you might act like, or simply let them draw their own conclusions upon meeting you?
I've never heard of this. Seems a little goofy. I'd prefer to base initial screening off of qualifications and then base further screening on interview impressions. But that's just me, and I am neither an employer nor a corporation, so my opinion doesn't mean much here.
Actually, I think my company does this. I don't agree with it, tbh. Personality should have no affect on the hiring process.
You had to give them this when you submitted your resume? I do think personality should matter (if you have an awful attitude and would clash with the team, you shouldn't be hired), but not this silly test.
-
Is it true some employers actually use this system to see if you are a good corporate fit? Seems an arbitrary thing to base that off of. I see some people include their MB score on their resumes too? Is it better to give them a generalized impression of what you might act like, or simply let them draw their own conclusions upon meeting you?
I've never heard of this. Seems a little goofy. I'd prefer to base initial screening off of qualifications and then base further screening on interview impressions. But that's just me, and I am neither an employer nor a corporation, so my opinion doesn't mean much here.
Actually, I think my company does this. I don't agree with it, tbh. Personality should have no affect on the hiring process.
You had to give them this when you submitted your resume? I do think personality should matter (if you have an awful attitude and would clash with the team, you shouldn't be hired), but not this silly test.
I know they do some sort of personality test, don't think it's this particular one, but one similar to it. And yes, I can see where it would be useful to assess one's compatibility within a particular department...
Idk, I guess I just wouldn't like being judged by any form of personality test in a job setting. I'd rather they give me a chance to prove myself first...
-
i remember it got me all wrong,
plus it didn't say pabl (punk ass ***** loser)
worst test ever 9/10 would sue
-
Or a personality change brought on by a significant life event?
Or maybe it's because I quit smoking the wacky...
And it's for that latter reason that I feel this latest result is more accurate.
My understanding is that ones personality type doesn't change, it's an abstraction of thought processes (or a set of patterns in brain activity, if Nardi is right). It can develop a bit though. One can learn to fake behavior of some other type or can be forced to do so too, although it isn't recognized as healthy (I don't really understand the consequences though). At last but not least, personality type doesn't describe the whole psyche.
-
Or a personality change brought on by a significant life event?
Or maybe it's because I quit smoking the wacky...
And it's for that latter reason that I feel this latest result is more accurate.
My understanding is that ones personality type doesn't change, it's an abstraction of thought processes (or a set of patterns in brain activity, if Nardi is right). It can develop a bit though. One can learn to fake behavior of some other type or can be forced to do so too, although it isn't recognized as healthy (I don't really understand the consequences though). At last but not least, personality type doesn't describe the whole psyche.
I have definitely noticed that cannabis (at least for me) numbs my emotions when used regularly, and now that I have stopped they have become much closer to the surface. Which in the case of this test, can show a major difference in personality (which is another reason why this test kinda sucks).
And the whole "fake behavior" or "forced personality" thing: majorly accurate in my case. It's so bad for me that I almost have a unique personality for pretty much every one of my friends. I can agree, it's not healthy, but it's how my introverted mind copes with social situations.
-
And the whole "fake behavior" or "forced personality" thing: majorly accurate in my case. It's so bad for me that I almost have a unique personality for pretty much every one of my friends. I can agree, it's not healthy, but it's how my introverted mind copes with social situations.
I do not know you outside of the forums, so obviously take this with a bucket of salt - but here's my take on this, as I tend to adjust my personality to the people I'm talking to as well (I'm assuming that what you said is similar to my situation). Okay, disclaimer done.
I see it as having the ability to relate to and converse easily with many different people easily. I don't see it as a crutch or a need to "fit in" and copy what the other person does. I've always considered it a sort of social skill, because some people either can't read a situation or just choose to act the same regardless of changing circumstances. I find that having the ability to adapt (while still being genuine and happy with yourself and how you're acting) is helpful, and not a drawback or a character flaw. (not intending for this to sound arrogant or anything like that, but I have thought about this before and this is the best interpretation I've come up with for my own situation)
Again, maybe we're talking totally different situations here. But if you haven't thought of it this way, maybe give it some consideration.
-
I have considered that perspective, but I still feel like, in my situation, it's more of a curse than an ability.
Reason I say that is because, now I truly don't know which personality is actually mine; it changes so frequently. It's as if the only time I can truly be myself is when I'm alone or with immediate family, which when trying to build outside relationships, is very much a bad thing.
It does have it's advantages (being able to adapt), but it also has that one HUGE disadvantage...
-
A necro reply, yay!
MBTI isn't a horoscope. Actually, it appears to correspond quite well to patterns in brain activity. That's where the interesting part happens anyway.
I agree that it's very useful for understanding a vast majority of people. That said, most people are not self-actualizing (aristotole would not consider them "people" at all). the test starts to break down for some people. (level 4-5 on positive disintegration, or an otherwise self-actualizing individual). Unfortunately such people are so uncommon, it's hard to find enough to study.
To me, it looks like there's an obvious link between certain aspects of self-actualization (as defined by Maslow or Dąbrowski) and traits of certain types. Would love to see a study on the subject.
TBH, I'm fairly skeptical about the theory of positive disintegration; it has even less recognition than personality typing in the scientific community. Not enough data to take it for granted. I take even personality type with a grain of salt, until there's a viable quantitative neuroscientific study—with a viable method to determine ones type, instead of taking tests of quality all over the place... and tests are still better than "the art of speedreading people", which doesn't work at all in too many cases IME.
-
Well, that's because those tests suck. I usually test as INTJ, although it has nothing to do with reality—I'm a walking INTP stereotype (described here (http://intp.org/intprofile.html) and there (http://oddlydevelopedtypes.com/content/secret-lives-intps)).
...or maybe it's because there's one significant flaw in MBTI, it cuts the curve in the middle, despite the fact that population is best described by something closer to the bell curve, not camel bumps (explanation (http://www.celebritytypes.com/blog/2014/02/mbti-for-skeptics/)).
YOU CANT COMPARTMENTALIZE ME!!! I AM AN UNIQUE SNOWFLAKE!!
*a unique
"an" doesn't need to go in front of every vowel, just the ones that sound like vowels...
With my ****ty pronunciation it does.
-
Well, that's because those tests suck. I usually test as INTJ, although it has nothing to do with reality—I'm a walking INTP stereotype (described here (http://intp.org/intprofile.html) and there (http://oddlydevelopedtypes.com/content/secret-lives-intps)).
...or maybe it's because there's one significant flaw in MBTI, it cuts the curve in the middle, despite the fact that population is best described by something closer to the bell curve, not camel bumps (explanation (http://www.celebritytypes.com/blog/2014/02/mbti-for-skeptics/)).
YOU CANT COMPARTMENTALIZE ME!!! I AM AN UNIQUE SNOWFLAKE!!
*a unique
"an" doesn't need to go in front of every vowel, just the ones that sound like vowels...
With my ****ty pronunciation it does.
If you pronounce 'unique' like a Frenchman, then you are totally right to precede it with 'an'. ;)
-
Well, that's because those tests suck. I usually test as INTJ, although it has nothing to do with reality—I'm a walking INTP stereotype (described here (http://intp.org/intprofile.html) and there (http://oddlydevelopedtypes.com/content/secret-lives-intps)).
...or maybe it's because there's one significant flaw in MBTI, it cuts the curve in the middle, despite the fact that population is best described by something closer to the bell curve, not camel bumps (explanation (http://www.celebritytypes.com/blog/2014/02/mbti-for-skeptics/)).
YOU CANT COMPARTMENTALIZE ME!!! I AM AN UNIQUE SNOWFLAKE!!
*a unique
"an" doesn't need to go in front of every vowel, just the ones that sound like vowels...
With my ****ty pronunciation it does.
If you pronounce 'unique' like a Frenchman, then you are totally right to precede it with 'an'. ;)
Touché
-
ISFP
Introvert(33%) Sensing(1%) Feeling(38%) Perceiving(11%)
There were some questions I couldn't really answer, so I'm not sure how accurate this is.
-
ISFP
Introvert(33%) Sensing(1%) Feeling(38%) Perceiving(11%)
There were some questions I couldn't really answer, so I'm not sure how accurate this is.
Extremely. Son, you're in the system now. There's no getting out.
-
There were some questions I couldn't really answer, so I'm not sure how accurate this is.
Looking at the 1% confidence, I recommend rather reading on cognitive functions.
-
And the whole "fake behavior" or "forced personality" thing: majorly accurate in my case. It's so bad for me that I almost have a unique personality for pretty much every one of my friends. I can agree, it's not healthy, but it's how my introverted mind copes with social situations.
I do not know you outside of the forums, so obviously take this with a bucket of salt - but here's my take on this, as I tend to adjust my personality to the people I'm talking to as well
i guess many people do, including me. that is neither hard nor bothersome. what bothers me all the time is the necessity to adapt the conversation to the intellectual level of the people i'm talking to. to choose simpler words, to make less subtle jokes. maybe to repeat something several times. eww.
-
And the whole "fake behavior" or "forced personality" thing: majorly accurate in my case. It's so bad for me that I almost have a unique personality for pretty much every one of my friends. I can agree, it's not healthy, but it's how my introverted mind copes with social situations.
I do not know you outside of the forums, so obviously take this with a bucket of salt - but here's my take on this, as I tend to adjust my personality to the people I'm talking to as well
i guess many people do, including me. that is neither hard nor bothersome. what bothers me all the time is the necessity to adapt the conversation to the intellectual level of the people i'm talking to. to choose simpler words, to make less subtle jokes. maybe to repeat something several times. eww.
Well, this thread is about personality, and now you are talking about intelligence. What it is interesting is how the first subject, now is evoking other aspects of the being. Maybe you should join MENSA to relate with people that can stand up to your level. I wonder where the "eww" fits though. :)
-
INTJ.
Introvert(67%) iNtuitive(12%) Thinking(25%) Judging(1%)
-
INTP
I[/size]ntrovert(33%) [/color][/size]i[/color][/size]N[/color][/size]tuitive(38%) [/color][/size]T[/color][/size]hinking(75%) [/color][/size]P[/color][/size]erceiving(11%)[/color][/size][/color]You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (33%)You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (38%)You have distinct preference of Thinking over Feeling (75%)You have slight preference of Perceiving over Judging (11%)[/size][/font]
-
INTJ
Introvert(72%) iNtuitive(94%) Thinking(50%) Judging(33%)
-
I hope ya'll understand that a large part of Personality is adaptive..
Which means that just because you scored one way AT THIS POINT in your life, Living Where you are now, DOES NOT predispose you to be that way forever..
Humans are highly plastic, both mentally and physically..
So.. keep that in mind, and never attempt to justify your choices by these artificial conceptions.
(http://eemoticons.net/Upload/big%20onion/th_46.gif)
-
And the whole "fake behavior" or "forced personality" thing: majorly accurate in my case. It's so bad for me that I almost have a unique personality for pretty much every one of my friends. I can agree, it's not healthy, but it's how my introverted mind copes with social situations.
I do not know you outside of the forums, so obviously take this with a bucket of salt - but here's my take on this, as I tend to adjust my personality to the people I'm talking to as well
i guess many people do, including me. that is neither hard nor bothersome. what bothers me all the time is the necessity to adapt the conversation to the intellectual level of the people i'm talking to. to choose simpler words, to make less subtle jokes. maybe to repeat something several times. eww.
Well, this thread is about personality, and now you are talking about intelligence. What it is interesting is how the first subject, now is evoking other aspects of the being. Maybe you should join MENSA to relate with people that can stand up to your level. I wonder where the "eww" fits though. :)
MENSA is below my level =)
-
ENTP
Extravert(1%) iNtuitive(6%) Thinking(50%) Perceiving(22%)
-
I hope ya'll understand that a large part of Personality is adaptive..
Which means that just because you scored one way AT THIS POINT in your life, Living Where you are now, DOES NOT predispose you to be that way forever..
Humans are highly plastic, both mentally and physically..
So.. keep that in mind, and never attempt to justify your choices by these artificial conceptions.
Show Image
(http://eemoticons.net/Upload/big%20onion/th_46.gif)
For me, I found it interesting that the description they gave me was really accurate. I think it's some kind of good way to know yourself more if used right.
-
INTP
Introvert(22%) iNtuitive(38%) Thinking(12%) Perceiving(44%)
You believe the best decision is one that can be easily changed
This one is complete BS without context...
-
snip
[citation needed]
-
INTP
Introvert(22%) iNtuitive(38%) Thinking(12%) Perceiving(44%)
You believe the best decision is one that can be easily changed
This one is complete BS without context...
doesn't that just mean you're Non-committal.. ladies beware... sly wolf here.. (http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/uhuhuh-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862523)
-
"tp4t
onion(100%)
you have layers"
-
I hope ya'll understand that a large part of Personality is adaptive..
Which means that just because you scored one way AT THIS POINT in your life, Living Where you are now, DOES NOT predispose you to be that way forever..
Humans are highly plastic, both mentally and physically..
So.. keep that in mind, and never attempt to justify your choices by these artificial conceptions.
Show Image
(http://eemoticons.net/Upload/big%20onion/th_46.gif)
Yeah, indeed. I would even go as far as to say it could change more than you think within a matter of days or hours, given a change in mood and circumstances. Also the general idea that you can bracket the entire human population into sixteen (is it sixteen? That's a guess because I can't be bothered to work it out) types of personality is naive and simplistic.
I think part of the reason people identify so readily with whatever result they've gotten from this type of quiz is because - much like horoscopes - everyone can identify with practically all the results to some extent, and since all the personality types can be seen as complimentary in some way, or suggest some sort of shared-ground with noteworthy people, there's a subconscious desire to identify with the result for purposes of self-affirmation. It's called the Forer effect.
-
I would even go as far as to say it could change more than you think within a matter of days or hours, given a change in mood and circumstances.
That's Big Five and it's supposed to work like that. It's also widely used by psychologists.
Also the general idea that you can bracket the entire human population into sixteen (is it sixteen? That's a guess because I can't be bothered to work it out) types of personality is naive and simplistic.
The codes are indeed a bit confusing. I like vectors better... Big Five and MBTI do correlate in a way.
I think part of the reason people identify so readily with whatever result they've gotten from this type of quiz is because - much like horoscopes - everyone can identify with practically all the results to some extent, and since all the personality types can be seen as complimentary in some way, or suggest some sort of shared-ground with noteworthy people, there's a subconscious desire to identify with the result for purposes of self-affirmation. It's called the Forer effect.
That's the case with any tool used in corporate environment or self-help books. Including Big Five. Fortunately, Jung's Psychological Types aren't written like that.
-
Well they appear to work exactly like that to me. The MBTI personality types read as though though virtually anyone could read and identify with every single one of them. The fact all the websites hosting the MBTI questionnaire give you your result a long with a list of celebrities you supposedly share type with, like Einstein or whatever, just triggers the needy part of people's subconscious to perpetuate the belief that it's correct.
-
I don't disagree that the fancy websites (and online tests) are misleading at best. Even MBTI itself is difficult to interpret correctly without basic understanding of Jung's work IMHO.
-
I don't disagree that the fancy websites (and online tests) are misleading at best. Even MBTI itself is difficult to interpret correctly without basic understanding of Jung's work IMHO.
All of Psychology is very imprecise because it attempts to cover extremely complicated interactions all at once..
So it's big on world theories, but lacking on fundamentals..
-
That's why I'm excited about Neuroscience of Personality (video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGfhQTbcqmA), book (http://www.amazon.com/Neuroscience-Personality-Brain-Insights-People/dp/0979868475)) and similar stuff.
-
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/3d4c7bc2d55257bc87e1be1c60cc2b96/tumblr_inline_ncg0szsTtx1rfj0lj.png)
(https://31.media.tumblr.com/c2d41ab5f7dda53a77b36f97c77bd0d9/tumblr_inline_ncg0uuUiji1rfj0lj.png)