geekhack

geekhack Community => Keyboards => Topic started by: petereps on Thu, 17 July 2014, 11:05:30

Title: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: petereps on Thu, 17 July 2014, 11:05:30
So after trying mx browns and deciding I would like a heavier more tactile keyswitch, I am looking for a board with mx clears. I also need arrow keys so the Poker massdrop isnt an option. This leaves me with either the KUL 87 or the CODE 87. Which board do you think I would be happier with? Just looking for opinions and advice. Thank you!  :thumb:
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: dante on Thu, 17 July 2014, 11:21:52
KUL feels more solid.  And they believe in their product: 2 year (KUL) vs. 1 year (WASD)
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: inanis on Thu, 17 July 2014, 12:22:49
I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: petereps on Thu, 17 July 2014, 12:32:33
I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.

Hm I feel like the ping would drive me insane haha. My current keyboard does that with the spacebar and it drives me wild. I think I am pretty settled on the KUL but I'll have to sleep on it
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: cribbit on Thu, 17 July 2014, 13:27:04
Fn + WASD is arrows on the Poker. The full programmability of the poker makes up for all the missing keys.
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: Lu_e on Thu, 17 July 2014, 13:56:05
One has cherry stabilizers one has costar... so that may factor into your decision?
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 17 July 2014, 14:02:50
One has cherry stabilizers one has costar... so that may factor into your decision?

Costar win.. 100%.. it's smoother, less sensitive to key cap warp induced stroke imbalance,

AND easy to fix / retune....  if something is out of place..

cherry stab, much harder to work with..
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: Puddsy on Thu, 17 July 2014, 15:27:17
But cherry stabs make it SO MUCH EASIER to change keycaps

My vote is VERY MUCH for the KUL. It's just a better keyboard overall. I love mine.
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: inanis on Thu, 17 July 2014, 15:47:35
But cherry stabs make it SO MUCH EASIER to change keycaps

+1 for the ease of use with the Cherry stabilizers. The stock keycaps on the CODE are very meh, and swapping them out with the Costar stabs was frustrating at times.
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: jalaj on Thu, 17 July 2014, 16:06:52
The Leopold FC660M also has an option for clears. It's a 66% KB with dedicated arrows.
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Thu, 17 July 2014, 16:07:56
The Leopold FC660M also has an option for clears. It's a 66% KB with dedicated arrows.

Yes that's a very good keyboard as well. There are also keycool 84's out there with clears if you can find them.
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: cribbit on Thu, 17 July 2014, 16:16:48
You barely missed getting a spare FC660M with clears off massdrop's July clearance sale.

Luckily, I missed it too, or my wallet would be crying. And thankfully the other boards for sale were all blues or reds.
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: petereps on Thu, 17 July 2014, 21:00:38
The Leopold FC660M also has an option for clears. It's a 66% KB with dedicated arrows.

Yes that's a very good keyboard as well. There are also keycool 84's out there with clears if you can find them.

Yea I just found out that this existed. Definitely going with this option, basically my perfect keyboard as far as switches, color, and layout. Thanks everyone!
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: Oobly on Fri, 18 July 2014, 01:35:38
Qtan sells them:

http://www.vendio.com/stores/E-sports-Gaming-equipments/item/shop-mechanical-keyboard-by-sw/leopold-fc660m-mechanical-keyb/lid=35722930

http://www.vendio.com/stores/E-sports-Gaming-equipments/item/shop-mechanical-keyboard-by-sw/leopold-fc660m-mechanical-keyb/lid=38527235

He has an account here on GH and his own vendor subforum: http://geekhack.org/index.php?board=81.0
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: TBone on Fri, 18 July 2014, 09:50:12
I did the Cherry Stabilizer Mod to my KUL and I think that clipped Cherry stabs are better than Costar every day of the week. I never want to deal with Costar stabs again. Although that voids the warranty...  :(
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: dante on Fri, 18 July 2014, 09:51:05
I did the Cherry Stabilizer Mod to my KUL and I think that clipped Cherry stabs are better than Costar every day of the week. I never want to deal with Costar stabs again. Although that voids the warranty...  :(

You - and everyone who has done this mod - should forward your research to KUL.  Maybe they will consider it and make it a standard feature.
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: bazh on Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:02:55
One has cherry stabilizers one has costar... so that may factor into your decision?

Costar win.. 100%.. it's smoother, less sensitive to key cap warp induced stroke imbalance,

AND easy to fix / retune....  if something is out of place..

cherry stab, much harder to work with..

:* :*


btw, what is KUL? :(
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:10:53
One has cherry stabilizers one has costar... so that may factor into your decision?

Costar win.. 100%.. it's smoother, less sensitive to key cap warp induced stroke imbalance,

AND easy to fix / retune....  if something is out of place..

cherry stab, much harder to work with..

:* :*


btw, what is KUL? :(

new keyboard manufacturer http://www.keyeduplabs.com/es-87.html (http://www.keyeduplabs.com/es-87.html)
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: digi on Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:12:08
I would choose the KUL it has the pcb mount stabs, the WASD uses cherry stabs, I've had both. They're both very good boards tho.
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: strict on Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:32:14
I would choose the KUL it has the pcb mount stabs, the WASD uses cherry stabs, I've had both. They're both very good boards tho.

I'm pretty sure KUL is Cherry plate mounted and WASD is Costar plate mounted.
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: TBone on Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:34:55
I would choose the KUL it has the pcb mount stabs, the WASD uses cherry stabs, I've had both. They're both very good boards tho.

Why do you say it has PCB mounted stabs? This is the second place you have stated this without backing it up.

 I just took it apart and did the mod (where I clipped the stabs) and I'm certain they are plate mounted...unless I'm totally wrong. I mean they are attatched to the plate...not the PCB. You have to desolder to remove the stabs. PCB mount you don't (unless I'm a total noob and wrong) :p

EDIT: Nevermind didn't see your response  :thumb:
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: digi on Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:34:56
I would choose the KUL it has the pcb mount stabs, the WASD uses cherry stabs, I've had both. They're both very good boards tho.

I'm pretty sure KUL is Cherry plate mounted and WASD is Costar plate mounted.

you're right, sorry, but I'd take the cherry plate stabs over the costar plate mount stabs any day. :)
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Fri, 18 July 2014, 10:35:11
I would choose the KUL it has the pcb mount stabs, the WASD uses cherry stabs, I've had both. They're both very good boards tho.

I'm pretty sure KUL is Cherry plate mounted and WASD is Costar plate mounted.

Yep you can see the KUL pics here http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=59116.0, definitely plate mounted cherry stabs
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: ajx on Fri, 18 July 2014, 12:33:28
I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.
Ping issue? what does it means actually?

Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: Flyersfan1 on Fri, 18 July 2014, 12:43:40
I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.
Ping issue? what does it means actually?
Courtesy of GH user daerid:
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: oscillik on Fri, 18 July 2014, 12:48:47
I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.
Ping issue? what does it means actually?
Courtesy of GH user daerid:

WASD has already confirmed on geekhack that the ping issue is due to the springs resonating.
Title: Re: KUL or CODE for cherry mx clear?
Post by: Heezy on Fri, 18 July 2014, 13:00:01
Wow the ping sounds horrible, I had a slight ping on my shift and enter, but I put orings on those.

I have two CODEs with Clears. Both feel solid and well built. I have not used the KUL so I can't compare it against that. One negative thing about the CODE is the amount of ping it produces. It really annoyed me at first, but then I got used to it and now I only notice if I'm listening for it. Some of the ping issue is probably my fault though, I tend to really hammer the keys so I'm sure the amount of force I'm using is making that situation worse. All in all, I really like it. I bought a second to match my first so that has to be a good sign.
Ping issue? what does it means actually?
Courtesy of GH user daerid: