check this out; I just got this sample today. so tiny.
218(L) X 103(W) X 15(H)mm
Show Image
(http://www.i-rocksusa.com/lg_image/KR-6600-BK-2.jpg)
That's a bit of a train crash layout, the FN key shouldn't be in a more prominent place than control as it's used less (I use it less anyway) and why on earth are comma and full stop smaller than the letters? They're used far more than z, q and x. I don't see any \ ¦ key either, even in the fn layer.
Keysonic does sell those keyboards over here and they are very tiny so you're not going to be flying over it anyway but if I was ever to get one I think I'd prefer it if it only the most important keys were left and the rest moved to the AltGr/FN layer - it would look much nicer and less cluttered and may be a bit more usable.
You are right; tks
check this out; I just got this sample today. so tiny.
218(L) X 103(W) X 15(H)mm
Show Image
(http://www.i-rocksusa.com/lg_image/KR-6600-BK-2.jpg)
Ah, you missed an opportunity there. I know you're concentrating on the US market at the moment, but if you were to cram another key between ";" and Return, this would be the small keyboard for Germany. Tiny keyboards are a big compromise anyway, so moving less-used characters away is the only thing you can do. But removing the " ' " key and putting it in a strange location will totally ruin the typing experience for anyone not using the US layout. There are a few ultra-small keyboards like that here, but they're just not usable for pretty much anything.
I don't know how involved you are with R&D, but close to no one has yet succeeded in designing a usable ISO-layout tiny keyboard. The only halfway decent ones I know are used in the Eee PC; the layout is still pretty bad, but at least it doesn't put the most-often used keys in strange locations.
-huha