Last I checked an alpsulator cost well more than it would to build one.
I could probably just buy a teensy or arduino and use it to emulate a calculator
Building your own is definitely the way to go.
http://kbdlab.co.kr/index.php?mid=board_Lsno50&page=13&document_srl=344913 (http://kbdlab.co.kr/index.php?mid=board_Lsno50&page=13&document_srl=344913)
There's also this (http://www.tatjavanvark.nl/tvv8/pock.html)Show Image(http://www.tatjavanvark.nl/tvv8/pock02s.jpg)
A little old school, but it was DIYd in 1978
I'm sort-of puzzled here. Most desk-calculators use rubber domes with sliders designed to minimize binding on off'axis presses. Cherry MX is not the best for off-axis perssing performance. Why do you want MX over a good RD calculator here?Ideally a calculator layout would be optimized for touch typing. Most calculator layouts are really quite inefficient because they’re designed for one-finger hunt and peck.
Building your own is definitely the way to go.
http://kbdlab.co.kr/index.php?mid=board_Lsno50&page=13&document_srl=344913 (http://kbdlab.co.kr/index.php?mid=board_Lsno50&page=13&document_srl=344913)
It would be hyper cool to have a MX/Alps based calculator (GHPad with a screen) that can be connected to the PC via USB to charge the internal battery as well as allow the usage of the calculator as a numpad. Then you can charge and use it as a numpad, while also being able to disconnect it and use it as a standalone calculator. Oh my, so exciting.
It would be hyper cool to have a MX/Alps based calculator (GHPad with a screen) that can be connected to the PC via USB to charge the internal battery as well as allow the usage of the calculator as a numpad. Then you can charge and use it as a numpad, while also being able to disconnect it and use it as a standalone calculator. Oh my, so exciting.