^what are you talking about? high refresh rate is enhanced by, but independent from ULMB/Lightboost. not that it matters, no IPS panel exceeds 60hz natively anyway. overclocking leads to artifacts on the screen from what i've heard, and i tend to avoid those Korean monitors due to shoddy build quality
OP, if you want to be blown away then the Rog SWIFT is your only choice. over your budget but i'm sure you won't even need to eat when you see how awesome that screen is
only if you overclock it too high ;)
I think it worked really well at 96Hz - even 120Hz but it just 'felt' too high, or rather, I was too scared to leave it at that :p since people reported problems with it.
the build quality is iffy indeed, but not horrible.
I don't care for ULMB/lightboost, as it introduces input lag. input lag is IMO the most important, don't like when it gets noticeable.
/headdesk
Show Image
(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/sweetdrop-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862522)
You know what.. I'm just going to stop helping people on this subject.. you'll be happier to remain ig-nant anyway.
Good bye..
damn trolls.
heh, i just don't like the concept of overclocking monitors in general. about ULMB/Lightboost, it adds something like 4ms input lag, which i don't think is noticeable unless you have it side by side with another monitor. consider that most online games already have anywhere between 30-100ms, 4 is insignificant in comparison. but with ULMB on you eliminate motion blurring completely, so i'd say it's worth it
well possibly. but I heard it was something like doubling the input lag at worst, which sounds bad to me. I've used some 20ms input lag monitors that were noticeably a lot laggier than ones measured 10ms (by the same reviewing site) so I'm very wary of that.
also online or not, 30-100ms ping is way different than input lag :p 100ms input lag would be horrible to play with.