Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 14:54:02
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 14:55:54
Post by: nubbinator on Thu, 05 March 2015, 14:56:16
Post by: azhdar on Thu, 05 March 2015, 14:56:27
Post by: hwood34 on Thu, 05 March 2015, 14:58:22
isn't there a rule like if you got it on left ear it's gay and right ear is regular sexuality?other way around lol
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 14:58:57
Show Image(http://images.geeknative.com.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/male-superheroes-flamebait.jpg)
Nothing to do with ear rings on dudes
Post by: azhdar on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:00:21
damn so that's real.isn't there a rule like if you got it on left ear it's gay and right ear is regular sexuality?other way around lol
So right ear is gay, does it work the same way for eyelid?
Post by: nubbinator on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:03:44
Show Image(http://images.geeknative.com.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/male-superheroes-flamebait.jpg)
Nothing to do with ear rings on dudes
This isn't a troll/flamebait thread? I thought it was.
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:05:50
Show Image(http://images.geeknative.com.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/male-superheroes-flamebait.jpg)
Nothing to do with ear rings on dudes
This isn't a troll/flamebait thread? I thought it was.
This is OT.. Trolling isn't possible.. We're always On-Topic in Off-Topic
Post by: fohat.digs on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:09:51
if you got it on left ear it's gay and right ear is regular sexuality?
Even an old man like me, who grew up when men did not wear jewelry, knows that:
"Right is Wrong and Left is Right"
with respect to the naughty gay thing, but that was back in the 1970s-80s
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:10:59
if you got it on left ear it's gay and right ear is regular sexuality?
Even an old man like me, who grew up when men did not wear jewelry, knows that:
"Right is Wrong and Left is Right"
with respect to the naughty gay thing, but that was back in the 1970s-80s
wait what? elaborate.. How does the old-school thing work?
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:14:15
Show Image(http://images.geeknative.com.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/male-superheroes-flamebait.jpg)
Nothing to do with ear rings on dudes
This isn't a troll/flamebait thread? I thought it was.
This is OT.. Trolling isn't possible.. We're always On-Topic in Off-Topic
We ways get banned for being off topic in off topic :/
if you got it on left ear it's gay and right ear is regular sexuality?
Even an old man like me, who grew up when men did not wear jewelry, knows that:
"Right is Wrong and Left is Right"
with respect to the naughty gay thing, but that was back in the 1970s-80s
Wait you guys accepted people that wore ear rings back in the day?
Post by: foxer on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:15:30
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:18:31
Flesh holes are pretty cool in moderate size.
Scars are sexier.
Post by: Ouro on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:19:16
Post by: JPG on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:20:09
if you got it on left ear it's gay and right ear is regular sexuality?
Even an old man like me, who grew up when men did not wear jewelry, knows that:
"Right is Wrong and Left is Right"
with respect to the naughty gay thing, but that was back in the 1970s-80s
I am pretty sure the good version of this should be: Right is Wrong and Left is Wrong too!
I know it's all a personal taste thing, but I honestly never seen a guy on which the earring looks good. It's either bad or very bad -->IN MY OPINION.
But well, to each our own preferences!
Post by: fohat.digs on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:22:11
Wait you guys accepted people that wore ear rings back in the day?
Even I am not old enough to remember pirates.
Until about the mid-1970s there were lots of subtle gay signals, such as wearing a scarf around your neck (100% gay, of course) but if the knot was on the left it meant you preferred one thing, and if the knot was on the right it meant that you liked something else.
It was all very arcane and I never knew much about it, but I was scared and embarrassed one day when I was leaning up against a wall with 1 foot on the ground and the other knee bent with the sole of my foot flat against the wall. I was approached, pretty aggressively, by some ruffians who took it as a signal that I was looking for gay action.
Post by: katushkin on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:24:08
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:24:40
"Too Ghey righ?" no go **** yourself
Post by: JPG on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:24:44
What's wrong with being gay ? (https://s3.amazonaws.com/tapatalk-emoji/emoji19.png) (https://s3.amazonaws.com/tapatalk-emoji/emoji19.png)
I saw no post yet saying gay was bad. And when I say that I consider earrings to look bad on guys, I include both gays and non-gays equally. You just can't blame people for putting the word gay in a phrase. Do it if they judge or insult gay people, not just talk about gays in general with no ill wording/intention...
Post by: JPG on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:26:27
What's wrong with being gay ? (https://s3.amazonaws.com/tapatalk-emoji/emoji19.png) (https://s3.amazonaws.com/tapatalk-emoji/emoji19.png)
I saw no post yet saying gay was bad. And when I say that I consider earrings to look bad on guys, I include both gays and non-gays equally. You just can't blame people for putting the word gay in a phrase. Do it if they judge or insult gay people, not just talk about gays in general with no ill wording/intention...
BTW, I ignore TP's post, as you should all hehe so his does not count imo.
Post by: nubbinator on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:26:33
What's wrong with being gay ?
Nothing. Unfortunately you entered the vortex of tp where up is down, right is left, and the ****ed up becomes normal and the normal and acceptable becomes weird.
I saw no post yet saying gay was bad. And when I say that I consider earrings to look bad on guys, I include both gays and non-gays equally. You just can't blame people for putting the word gay in a phrase. Do it if they judge or insult gay people, not just talk about gays in general with no ill wording/intention...
It's implicit in a post like this. While it's not flat out started, it is a part of the subtext and implied by the context and responses. It treats being gay as a negative thing and ostracized those who do things others might consider to be stereotypically gay.
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:29:02
What's wrong with being gay ?
Being overly sensitive for starters.
Post by: foxer on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:30:33
Post by: hwood34 on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:31:40
Flesh holes are pretty cool in moderate size.until you start looking like Ricky Hoover
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/83/Ricky_Hoover.jpg)
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:31:57
What's wrong with being gay ?
Nothing. Unfortunately you entered the vortex of tp where up is down, right is left, and the ****ed up becomes normal and the normal and acceptable becomes weird.I saw no post yet saying gay was bad. And when I say that I consider earrings to look bad on guys, I include both gays and non-gays equally. You just can't blame people for putting the word gay in a phrase. Do it if they judge or insult gay people, not just talk about gays in general with no ill wording/intention...
It's implicit in a post like this. While it's not flat out started, it is implied by the context and responses. It treats being gay as a negative thing and ostracized those who do things others might consider to be stereotypically gay.
(http://www.cute-factor.com/images/smilies/onion/th_107_.gif)
And lest you forget... " There is no escape ! "
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:35:14
What's wrong with being gay ?
Being overly sensitive for starters.
Yea man, I have no idea where you guys are getting this "ostracizing" from..
If you believe that, it's your own prejudice..
Tp4 was just considering maybe .. maybe.. wearing the collectable deathnote- L - earings he got from the internet.
Post by: foxer on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:41:37
Flesh holes are pretty cool in moderate size.until you start looking like Ricky HooverShow Image(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/83/Ricky_Hoover.jpg)
Hence the moderate size. Although his tattoos are pretty legit. And his ears seem okay with his appearance.
Post by: Booper on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:46:31
That being said, I personally tend to like small gauges on most people :thumb:
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:49:17
I saw no post yet saying gay was bad. And when I say that I consider earrings to look bad on guys, I include both gays and non-gays equally. You just can't blame people for putting the word gay in a phrase. Do it if they judge or insult gay people, not just talk about gays in general with no ill wording/intention...
It's implicit in a post like this. While it's not flat out started, it is a part of the subtext and implied by the context and responses. It treats being gay as a negative thing and ostracized those who do things others might consider to be stereotypically gay.
Awwww don't explain the mechanism :/
That's what sarcasm is for ;)
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:51:34
I saw no post yet saying gay was bad. And when I say that I consider earrings to look bad on guys, I include both gays and non-gays equally. You just can't blame people for putting the word gay in a phrase. Do it if they judge or insult gay people, not just talk about gays in general with no ill wording/intention...
It's implicit in a post like this. While it's not flat out started, it is a part of the subtext and implied by the context and responses. It treats being gay as a negative thing and ostracized those who do things others might consider to be stereotypically gay.
Awwww don't explain the mechanism :/
That's what sarcasm is for ;)
So 1 gay dude says to another..
Not-wearing my earings today.. "too straight? "
How would ya'll react to that statement, had gays been the majority population..
So yea.. fk off with that prejudice argument.. There is no indication of that.. If you see it that way.. that's ALL ON YOU..
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:53:10
I saw no post yet saying gay was bad. And when I say that I consider earrings to look bad on guys, I include both gays and non-gays equally. You just can't blame people for putting the word gay in a phrase. Do it if they judge or insult gay people, not just talk about gays in general with no ill wording/intention...
It's implicit in a post like this. While it's not flat out started, it is a part of the subtext and implied by the context and responses. It treats being gay as a negative thing and ostracized those who do things others might consider to be stereotypically gay.
Awwww don't explain the mechanism :/
That's what sarcasm is for ;)
So 1 gay dude says to another..
Not-wearing my earings today.. "too straight? "
How would ya'll react to that statement, had gays been the majority population..
So yea.. fk off with that prejudice argument.. There is no indication of that.. If you see it that way.. that's ALL ON YOU..
Gays would not be the majority of a population because they can't reproduce.
Post by: hwood34 on Thu, 05 March 2015, 15:56:22
yea, though he got reconstructive surgery to get rid of the plugsFlesh holes are pretty cool in moderate size.until you start looking like Ricky HooverShow Image(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/83/Ricky_Hoover.jpg)
Hence the moderate size. Although his tattoos are pretty legit. And his ears seem okay with his appearance.
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:06:15
I saw no post yet saying gay was bad. And when I say that I consider earrings to look bad on guys, I include both gays and non-gays equally. You just can't blame people for putting the word gay in a phrase. Do it if they judge or insult gay people, not just talk about gays in general with no ill wording/intention...
It's implicit in a post like this. While it's not flat out started, it is a part of the subtext and implied by the context and responses. It treats being gay as a negative thing and ostracized those who do things others might consider to be stereotypically gay.
Awwww don't explain the mechanism :/
That's what sarcasm is for ;)
So 1 gay dude says to another..
Not-wearing my earings today.. "too straight? "
How would ya'll react to that statement, had gays been the majority population..
So yea.. fk off with that prejudice argument.. There is no indication of that.. If you see it that way.. that's ALL ON YOU..
Gays would not be the majority of a population because they can't reproduce.
Gays can't reproduce with -each other-.. but they certainly CAN reproduce.
and the fact that gays exist is proof of that..
The percentage of gays as part of the total population is not CURRENTLY the majority..
But it stands to reason, that perhaps in the future when we have a completely functional artificial-womb.. that maybe everyone would be gay, or at least a-sexual, because there'd be no point to pair bond.. or to produce women..
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:07:00
go **** a ****What's wrong with being gay ?
Being overly sensitive for starters.
Yea man, I have no idea where you guys are getting this "ostracizing" from..
If you believe that, it's your own prejudice..
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:11:33
[attachimg=1]I saw no post yet saying gay was bad. And when I say that I consider earrings to look bad on guys, I include both gays and non-gays equally. You just can't blame people for putting the word gay in a phrase. Do it if they judge or insult gay people, not just talk about gays in general with no ill wording/intention...
It's implicit in a post like this. While it's not flat out started, it is a part of the subtext and implied by the context and responses. It treats being gay as a negative thing and ostracized those who do things others might consider to be stereotypically gay.
Awwww don't explain the mechanism :/
That's what sarcasm is for ;)
So 1 gay dude says to another..
Not-wearing my earings today.. "too straight? "
How would ya'll react to that statement, had gays been the majority population..
So yea.. fk off with that prejudice argument.. There is no indication of that.. If you see it that way.. that's ALL ON YOU..
Gays would not be the majority of a population because they can't reproduce.
Gays can't reproduce with -each other-.. but they certainly CAN reproduce.
and the fact that gays exist is proof of that..
The percentage of gays as part of the total population is not CURRENTLY the majority..
But it stands to reason, that perhaps in the future when we have a completely functional artificial-womb.. that maybe everyone would be gay, or at least a-sexual, because there'd be no point to pair bond.. or to produce women..
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:21:56
(Attachment Link)I saw no post yet saying gay was bad. And when I say that I consider earrings to look bad on guys, I include both gays and non-gays equally. You just can't blame people for putting the word gay in a phrase. Do it if they judge or insult gay people, not just talk about gays in general with no ill wording/intention...
It's implicit in a post like this. While it's not flat out started, it is a part of the subtext and implied by the context and responses. It treats being gay as a negative thing and ostracized those who do things others might consider to be stereotypically gay.
Awwww don't explain the mechanism :/
That's what sarcasm is for ;)
So 1 gay dude says to another..
Not-wearing my earings today.. "too straight? "
How would ya'll react to that statement, had gays been the majority population..
So yea.. fk off with that prejudice argument.. There is no indication of that.. If you see it that way.. that's ALL ON YOU..
Gays would not be the majority of a population because they can't reproduce.
Gays can't reproduce with -each other-.. but they certainly CAN reproduce.
and the fact that gays exist is proof of that..
The percentage of gays as part of the total population is not CURRENTLY the majority..
But it stands to reason, that perhaps in the future when we have a completely functional artificial-womb.. that maybe everyone would be gay, or at least a-sexual, because there'd be no point to pair bond.. or to produce women..
LOL.. I don't have a diary.. But I do keep a log of my "wacky" ideas..
Also.. I'm not gay, if that's what you're getting at.. LOL
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:32:09
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:35:27
You know who Jack Harkness is right?
Yea I watch wh0..
Though I feel a bit like a sheldon.. as I can't decode your referencing..
Post by: taylordcraig on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:36:36
Wait you guys accepted people that wore ear rings back in the day?
Even I am not old enough to remember pirates.
Until about the mid-1970s there were lots of subtle gay signals, such as wearing a scarf around your neck (100% gay, of course) but if the knot was on the left it meant you preferred one thing, and if the knot was on the right it meant that you liked something else.
It was all very arcane and I never knew much about it, but I was scared and embarrassed one day when I was leaning up against a wall with 1 foot on the ground and the other knee bent with the sole of my foot flat against the wall. I was approached, pretty aggressively, by some ruffians who took it as a signal that I was looking for gay action.
AHAHA that's insane. It's such a comfortable way to stand.
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:38:47
Wait you guys accepted people that wore ear rings back in the day?
Even I am not old enough to remember pirates.
Until about the mid-1970s there were lots of subtle gay signals, such as wearing a scarf around your neck (100% gay, of course) but if the knot was on the left it meant you preferred one thing, and if the knot was on the right it meant that you liked something else.
It was all very arcane and I never knew much about it, but I was scared and embarrassed one day when I was leaning up against a wall with 1 foot on the ground and the other knee bent with the sole of my foot flat against the wall. I was approached, pretty aggressively, by some ruffians who took it as a signal that I was looking for gay action.
AHAHA that's insane. It's such a comfortable way to stand.
hahahahahaa.....
that's hilarious..... a young fohat.. approached... aggressively.. by LARGE... Ruffians.
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:39:00
[But it stands to reason, that perhaps in the future when we have a completely functional artificial-womb.. that maybe everyone would be gay, or at least a-sexual, because there'd be no point to pair bond.. or to produce women..
There's a line from the 10th (I think) about sex in the 51st century being more open or something like that when he and his companion are meeting up with Jack.
Hence Harkness and your dairy.
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:43:51
[But it stands to reason, that perhaps in the future when we have a completely functional artificial-womb.. that maybe everyone would be gay, or at least a-sexual, because there'd be no point to pair bond.. or to produce women..
There's a line from the 10th (I think) about sex in the 51st century being more open or something like that when he and his companion are meeting up with Jack.
Hence Harkness and your dairy.
ah I c... gotcha..
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:44:43
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:51:27
Wait you guys accepted people that wore ear rings back in the day?
Even I am not old enough to remember pirates.
Until about the mid-1970s there were lots of subtle gay signals, such as wearing a scarf around your neck (100% gay, of course) but if the knot was on the left it meant you preferred one thing, and if the knot was on the right it meant that you liked something else.
It was all very arcane and I never knew much about it, but I was scared and embarrassed one day when I was leaning up against a wall with 1 foot on the ground and the other knee bent with the sole of my foot flat against the wall. I was approached, pretty aggressively, by some ruffians who took it as a signal that I was looking for gay action.
AHAHA that's insane. It's such a comfortable way to stand.
I very vividly remember an episode of Rocket Power where the "cool older kids" were standing like that, and one of the kids started standing like that to fit in with their crowd. The whole episode was about fitting in with them. Can't find a clip though. Probably doesn't matter, since it's not really relevant, other than to say that I've never heard of this that fohat is mentioning. :P
Post by: brimborion on Thu, 05 March 2015, 16:54:14
Post by: jacobolus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 17:09:35
I know it's all a personal taste thing, but I honestly never seen a guy on which the earring looks good. It's either bad or very bad -->IN MY OPINION.Earrings also look stupid on women.. but who cares?
Post by: demik on Thu, 05 March 2015, 17:10:49
Post by: dustinhxc on Thu, 05 March 2015, 17:30:56
Flesh holes are pretty cool in moderate size.until you start looking like Ricky HooverShow Image(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/83/Ricky_Hoover.jpg)
Ha hell yea I'm online friends w that dude.
I've had my ears pierced for about 14 years. Haven't wore anything in over a year but they were 1 3/8" stretched. Also have had MANY other piercings. Piercings on guys and girls are awesome!
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 17:31:45
Post by: dustinhxc on Thu, 05 March 2015, 17:33:45
We need to pierce your keyboards
Or my keycaps now that would look rad.
Post by: hwood34 on Thu, 05 March 2015, 17:38:34
Damn, you're friends with Ricky Hoover?! Awesome!Flesh holes are pretty cool in moderate size.until you start looking like Ricky HooverShow Image(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/83/Ricky_Hoover.jpg)
Ha hell yea I'm online friends w that dude.
I've had my ears pierced for about 14 years. Haven't wore anything in over a year but they were 1 3/8" stretched. Also have had MANY other piercings. Piercings on guys and girls are awesome!
Post by: Melvang on Thu, 05 March 2015, 17:45:12
We need to pierce your keyboards
Or my keycaps now that would look rad.
But how are you going to stretch them?
Post by: noisyturtle on Thu, 05 March 2015, 18:03:48
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Thu, 05 March 2015, 18:07:49
Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 18:11:22
Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
Naw, you can't ban him.
A girlshark wizbro always needs a nasty turtle.
Post by: noisyturtle on Thu, 05 March 2015, 18:29:48
Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
I honestly haven't seen a guy wearing a stud since the early 2000s, and everyone I've met with gauges regrets them.
Post by: Halverson on Thu, 05 March 2015, 18:48:51
Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
I honestly haven't seen a guy wearing a stud since the early 2000s, and everyone I've met with gauges regrets them.
Oh no, noisy doesn't like my gauges. I just hope he doesn't turn on me like that coffee pot of his....
Post by: noisyturtle on Thu, 05 March 2015, 18:51:01
Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
I honestly haven't seen a guy wearing a stud since the early 2000s, and everyone I've met with gauges regrets them.
Oh no, noisy doesn't like my gauges.
I'm sure it's the first thing employers notice ;)
Post by: Halverson on Thu, 05 March 2015, 18:53:54
Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
I honestly haven't seen a guy wearing a stud since the early 2000s, and everyone I've met with gauges regrets them.
Oh no, noisy doesn't like my gauges.
I'm sure it's the first thing employers notice ;)
Well I guess I hope in the future you're not employing me :)
Post by: baldgye on Thu, 05 March 2015, 18:54:41
Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
I honestly haven't seen a guy wearing a stud since the early 2000s, and everyone I've met with gauges regrets them.
Oh no, noisy doesn't like my gauges.
I'm sure it's the first thing employers notice ;)
Real talk though, if he is qualified, intelligent, capable and able to dress appropriately they wont care.
A friend of the family works for one of the biggest European banks and has done for over 20 years now, he brokers deals between banks and earns insane money. Yet he barely wears clothes, has been arrested for drug charges and barely goes to work.
The notion that you can't get a job becasue your tats will show or something like that is just dumb and unfounded. In the real world the people best suited for the job get the jobs, not the people who look the prettiest or have the best kept suit.
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 05 March 2015, 19:12:28
Post by: YoungMichael88 on Thu, 05 March 2015, 19:13:36
I agree. So many people have had tattoos and piercings/gauges for so many years now that it's too common place to judge people's work ethic etc on. I'm sure at one point in time this was true, but there was also a time where people wouldn't hire you if you had long (and not even that long) hair. Those days are gone. Same with tats and piercings I would say. Save for a few judgmental jackasses.Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
I honestly haven't seen a guy wearing a stud since the early 2000s, and everyone I've met with gauges regrets them.
Oh no, noisy doesn't like my gauges.
I'm sure it's the first thing employers notice ;)
Real talk though, if he is qualified, intelligent, capable and able to dress appropriately they wont care.
A friend of the family works for one of the biggest European banks and has done for over 20 years now, he brokers deals between banks and earns insane money. Yet he barely wears clothes, has been arrested for drug charges and barely goes to work.
The notion that you can't get a job becasue your tats will show or something like that is just dumb and unfounded. In the real world the people best suited for the job get the jobs, not the people who look the prettiest or have the best kept suit.
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 19:14:16
Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
I honestly haven't seen a guy wearing a stud since the early 2000s, and everyone I've met with gauges regrets them.
Oh no, noisy doesn't like my gauges.
I'm sure it's the first thing employers notice ;)
Real talk though, if he is qualified, intelligent, capable and able to dress appropriately they wont care.
A friend of the family works for one of the biggest European banks and has done for over 20 years now, he brokers deals between banks and earns insane money. Yet he barely wears clothes, has been arrested for drug charges and barely goes to work.
The notion that you can't get a job becasue your tats will show or something like that is just dumb and unfounded. In the real world the people best suited for the job get the jobs, not the people who look the prettiest or have the best kept suit.
Um...
Yea.....
I wish that was the case.....
But.. there's been mounting research that says prettier people DO get an uneven appraisal despite equivalent performance.
Post by: baldgye on Thu, 05 March 2015, 19:17:03
Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
I honestly haven't seen a guy wearing a stud since the early 2000s, and everyone I've met with gauges regrets them.
Oh no, noisy doesn't like my gauges.
I'm sure it's the first thing employers notice ;)
Real talk though, if he is qualified, intelligent, capable and able to dress appropriately they wont care.
A friend of the family works for one of the biggest European banks and has done for over 20 years now, he brokers deals between banks and earns insane money. Yet he barely wears clothes, has been arrested for drug charges and barely goes to work.
The notion that you can't get a job becasue your tats will show or something like that is just dumb and unfounded. In the real world the people best suited for the job get the jobs, not the people who look the prettiest or have the best kept suit.
Um...
Yea.....
I wish that was the case.....
But.. there's been mounting research that says prettier people DO get an uneven appraisal despite equivalent performance.
That's true I guess. I mean, you only have to look at the leaders most developed nations of the last 100+ years. All babes.
Post by: noisyturtle on Thu, 05 March 2015, 20:19:27
Post by: jacobolus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 20:24:29
A few months ago a I passed a guy on the street who was clearly a wizard. He was wearing a long flowing dark blue/purple robe, had a long white beard, and some kind of robe-matching hat, and he was striding down the sidewalk with the most wizardly gait I’ve ever seen, natural as can be. Like, he didn’t seem like a dude in a costume, but rather like that was just his normal everyday style.
Post by: Melvang on Thu, 05 March 2015, 20:48:53
A few months ago a I passed a guy on the street who was clearly a wizard. He was wearing a long flowing dark blue/purple robe, had a long white beard, and some kind of robe-matching hat, and he was striding down the sidewalk with the most wizardly gait I’ve ever seen, natural as can be. Like, he didn’t seem like a dude in a costume, but rather like that was just his normal everyday style.
That is the kind of guy I want at a D&D session.
Post by: dustinhxc on Thu, 05 March 2015, 21:14:25
Here in San Francisco, tattoos and piercings don’t even merit a second glance. There are so many people in all leather, or with traditional clothes from somewhere half around the world, or cross-dressing outrageously, or dressed like clowns, etc., or sometimes just naked, that it’s hard to define “normal”.
A few months ago a I passed a guy on the street who was clearly a wizard. He was wearing a long flowing dark blue/purple robe, had a long white beard, and some kind of robe-matching hat, and he was striding down the sidewalk with the most wizardly gait I’ve ever seen, natural as can be. Like, he didn’t seem like a dude in a costume, but rather like that was just his normal everyday style.
Oh man that is the best thing Ive heard in a while!! :)
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 05 March 2015, 21:18:13
joke's on you you're married to me
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 05 March 2015, 21:18:15
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 21:18:59
couldn't stop thinking about the "too ghey" comment, tp4
joke's on you you're married to me
I want a divorce... (http://www.cute-factor.com/images/smilies/onion/087.gif)
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 05 March 2015, 21:19:41
you're just insecure about your accessories, darlingcouldn't stop thinking about the "too ghey" comment, tp4
joke's on you you're married to me
I want a divorce...Show Image(http://www.cute-factor.com/images/smilies/onion/087.gif)
no need to start threads about it
Post by: noisyturtle on Thu, 05 March 2015, 21:20:01
tp thread is tp thread
or a the1onewolf thread
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Thu, 05 March 2015, 21:23:31
tp thread is tp thread
or a the1onewolf thread
they're practically interchangeable... i truly can't tell them apart anymore...
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 05 March 2015, 21:25:16
im married to one and hired hourly by another but the relationship's practically the same so i'll assist you in figuring it outtp thread is tp thread
or a the1onewolf thread
they're practically interchangeable... i truly can't tell them apart anymore...
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 21:49:00
im married to one and hired hourly by another but the relationship's practically the same so i'll assist you in figuring it outtp thread is tp thread
or a the1onewolf thread
they're practically interchangeable... i truly can't tell them apart anymore...
Finding the people who resonate with oneself is good..
Post by: tbc on Thu, 05 March 2015, 21:56:24
Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
I honestly haven't seen a guy wearing a stud since the early 2000s, and everyone I've met with gauges regrets them.
Oh no, noisy doesn't like my gauges.
I'm sure it's the first thing employers notice ;)
Real talk though, if he is qualified, intelligent, capable and able to dress appropriately they wont care.
A friend of the family works for one of the biggest European banks and has done for over 20 years now, he brokers deals between banks and earns insane money. Yet he barely wears clothes, has been arrested for drug charges and barely goes to work.
The notion that you can't get a job becasue your tats will show or something like that is just dumb and unfounded. In the real world the people best suited for the job get the jobs, not the people who look the prettiest or have the best kept suit.
Um...
Yea.....
I wish that was the case.....
But.. there's been mounting research that says prettier people DO get an uneven appraisal despite equivalent performance.
That's true I guess. I mean, you only have to look at the leaders most developed nations of the last 100+ years. All babes.
customer service jobs DEFINITELY rate appearance. pretty girls > regular girls > guys.
why? people are less likely to complain if the csr is a girl. not counting the very small demographic of publicly sexist people who complain more if it IS a girl.
trufakts
EDIT:
oh, and my school had a 'scandal' where the hiring manager admitted to hiring the female teacher because she was better looking.
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 22:13:08
Dudes with earrings? What is this, 1995?
Some guys wear gauges, but they look gross. I think the people who wear them know they look gross too.
You have been banned from The Church of The Girlshark Wizbro.
I honestly haven't seen a guy wearing a stud since the early 2000s, and everyone I've met with gauges regrets them.
Oh no, noisy doesn't like my gauges.
I'm sure it's the first thing employers notice ;)
Real talk though, if he is qualified, intelligent, capable and able to dress appropriately they wont care.
A friend of the family works for one of the biggest European banks and has done for over 20 years now, he brokers deals between banks and earns insane money. Yet he barely wears clothes, has been arrested for drug charges and barely goes to work.
The notion that you can't get a job becasue your tats will show or something like that is just dumb and unfounded. In the real world the people best suited for the job get the jobs, not the people who look the prettiest or have the best kept suit.
Um...
Yea.....
I wish that was the case.....
But.. there's been mounting research that says prettier people DO get an uneven appraisal despite equivalent performance.
That's true I guess. I mean, you only have to look at the leaders most developed nations of the last 100+ years. All babes.
customer service jobs DEFINITELY rate appearance. pretty girls > regular girls > guys.
why? people are less likely to complain if the csr is a girl. not counting the very small demographic of publicly sexist people who complain more if it IS a girl.
trufakts
EDIT:
oh, and my school had a 'scandal' where the hiring manager admitted to hiring the female teacher because she was better looking.
He should've said, the kids paid more attention in class due to the teacher's appearance.
Post by: Sygaldry on Thu, 05 March 2015, 22:13:24
I used to have 5 earrings, 2 of which were small gauges... :-[
They're all closed up though... took them out senior year of college for job interviews...
Post by: tp4tissue on Thu, 05 March 2015, 22:15:11
Damn... so much hate for earrings on guys in this thread...
I used to have 5 earrings, 2 of which were small gauges... :-[
They're all closed up though... took them out senior year of college for job interviews...
5 ?
now I feel like a square... i was only considering the 1
Post by: PunksDead on Thu, 05 March 2015, 22:17:08
Post by: Novus on Thu, 05 March 2015, 22:20:48
tp thread is tp thread
or a the1onewolf thread
they're practically interchangeable... i truly can't tell them apart anymore...
That's because you take yourself too seriously.
Post by: jamster on Thu, 05 March 2015, 23:44:19
Real talk though, if he is qualified, intelligent, capable and able to dress appropriately they wont care.
A friend of the family works for one of the biggest European banks and has done for over 20 years now, he brokers deals between banks and earns insane money. Yet he barely wears clothes, has been arrested for drug charges and barely goes to work.
The notion that you can't get a job becasue your tats will show or something like that is just dumb and unfounded. In the real world the people best suited for the job get the jobs, not the people who look the prettiest or have the best kept suit.
That's one of those "exceptions that proves the rule" examples.
On the other hand, I've spent my entire professional life in IT in banking/finance environments (London, Hong Kong and NY) and have only noticed one person with exposed tatoos. And he had come out of the Royal Navy, so it was hardly surprising. I've known people with tatoos, but they were always in places that were covered by work clothing.
Thinking that appearances don't matter is naive. Appearances always matter, whether overtly or subconciously in the mind of interviewers and hiring managers. So do non-visual cues like someone's tone of voice or the presence of body odour. If you've ever spent time in front office banking environments, or private wealth management, you'd have noticed that the concentration of hot women improves drastically. Not because they are smarter than plain women, but because they can sell.
Post by: tbc on Fri, 06 March 2015, 00:34:08
Thinking that appearances don't matter is naive. Appearances always matter, whether overtly or subconciously in the mind of interviewers and hiring managers. So do non-visual cues like someone's tone of voice or the presence of body odour. If you've ever spent time in front office banking environments, or private wealth management, you'd have noticed that the concentration of hot women improves drastically. Not because they are smarter than plain women, but because they can sell.
you don't even have to go that far.
who looks more intimidating? a guy with a gun or the same guy without it?
Post by: Novus on Fri, 06 March 2015, 00:42:58
Thinking that appearances don't matter is naive. Appearances always matter, whether overtly or subconciously in the mind of interviewers and hiring managers. So do non-visual cues like someone's tone of voice or the presence of body odour. If you've ever spent time in front office banking environments, or private wealth management, you'd have noticed that the concentration of hot women improves drastically. Not because they are smarter than plain women, but because they can sell.
you don't even have to go that far.
who looks more intimidating? a guy with a gun or the same guy without it?
A black guy or latino with sagging pants.
[attachimg=1]
Post by: iri on Fri, 06 March 2015, 02:25:09
Post by: Novus on Fri, 06 March 2015, 02:26:14
Post by: trizkut on Fri, 06 March 2015, 02:40:44
Cream pies are also good
Not a valid vimeo URL
Post by: Novus on Fri, 06 March 2015, 03:36:50
Cream pies are also good
Not a valid vimeo URL
:thumb:
I love watching this show before I pass out.
Post by: baldgye on Fri, 06 March 2015, 03:43:50
Real talk though, if he is qualified, intelligent, capable and able to dress appropriately they wont care.
A friend of the family works for one of the biggest European banks and has done for over 20 years now, he brokers deals between banks and earns insane money. Yet he barely wears clothes, has been arrested for drug charges and barely goes to work.
The notion that you can't get a job becasue your tats will show or something like that is just dumb and unfounded. In the real world the people best suited for the job get the jobs, not the people who look the prettiest or have the best kept suit.
That's one of those "exceptions that proves the rule" examples.
On the other hand, I've spent my entire professional life in IT in banking/finance environments (London, Hong Kong and NY) and have only noticed one person with exposed tatoos. And he had come out of the Royal Navy, so it was hardly surprising. I've known people with tatoos, but they were always in places that were covered by work clothing.
Thinking that appearances don't matter is naive. Appearances always matter, whether overtly or subconciously in the mind of interviewers and hiring managers. So do non-visual cues like someone's tone of voice or the presence of body odour. If you've ever spent time in front office banking environments, or private wealth management, you'd have noticed that the concentration of hot women improves drastically. Not because they are smarter than plain women, but because they can sell.
What do hot women have to do with earrings on men?
Appearances matter, but what matters more is ability. I've worked in the commercial IT world for a while and deal with tons of sales guys from companies all over the world. Most of them are men and most of them are pretty ugly looking dudes (least from what I can tell).
The notion that beauty simply wins over everything else is mostly not true unless your working in TV or something.
But enough derailing this thread over something that non of us have done extensive studies on.
My point was that an earring isn't some insane taboo anymore that would mean you don't get a job. Employers for the most part couldn't give a **** as long as your clean, dress appropriatly and can do the job.
Post by: Novus on Fri, 06 March 2015, 03:58:37
You are always replaceable with somebody younger with better credentials. You can't be complete unskilled but at the end of the day ability really amounts to jack **** if you can't play the game.
Post by: iri on Fri, 06 March 2015, 03:59:26
Employers for the most part don't give a **** as long as you are clean, don't smell and can do the job.
Post by: baldgye on Fri, 06 March 2015, 03:59:45
Ability is not something you can always gauge and frankly ability is over rated.
People without ability are always in positions of power.
Being good looking (with social skills and charm) and a average ability is much more useful than just being skilled.
Maybe if you've never worked before?
Post by: Novus on Fri, 06 March 2015, 04:03:34
Ability is not something you can always gauge and frankly ability is over rated.
People without ability are always in positions of power.
Being good looking (with social skills and charm) and a average ability is much more useful than just being skilled.
Maybe if you've never worked before?
Or maybe you're just not high enough on the totem pole.
Post by: GenKaan on Fri, 06 March 2015, 04:05:35
Post by: baldgye on Fri, 06 March 2015, 04:08:08
Ability is not something you can always gauge and frankly ability is over rated.
People without ability are always in positions of power.
Being good looking (with social skills and charm) and a average ability is much more useful than just being skilled.
Maybe if you've never worked before?
Or maybe you're just not high enough on the totem pole.
No, becasue once you start working in industry and you move jobs you get positions from or via recommendations or head hunted. This is where your ability to do the job far outshines any qualifications you have. It's why the blokes in the best positions are usually the worst qualified yet the most able, it's also why kids out of uni don't get those kinds of jobs.
Post by: Novus on Fri, 06 March 2015, 04:19:02
Ability is not something you can always gauge and frankly ability is over rated.
People without ability are always in positions of power.
Being good looking (with social skills and charm) and a average ability is much more useful than just being skilled.
Maybe if you've never worked before?
Or maybe you're just not high enough on the totem pole.
No, becasue once you start working in industry and you move jobs you get positions from or via recommendations or head hunted. This is where your ability to do the job far outshines any qualifications you have. It's why the blokes in the best positions are usually the worst qualified yet the most able, it's also why kids out of uni don't get those kinds of jobs.
That makes you a fixer not a leader
Post by: baldgye on Fri, 06 March 2015, 04:29:48
Ability is not something you can always gauge and frankly ability is over rated.
People without ability are always in positions of power.
Being good looking (with social skills and charm) and a average ability is much more useful than just being skilled.
Maybe if you've never worked before?
Or maybe you're just not high enough on the totem pole.
No, becasue once you start working in industry and you move jobs you get positions from or via recommendations or head hunted. This is where your ability to do the job far outshines any qualifications you have. It's why the blokes in the best positions are usually the worst qualified yet the most able, it's also why kids out of uni don't get those kinds of jobs.
That makes you a fixer not a leader
What are you even talking about, management?
From my experience management work up the ladder pretty much in house or are head hunted from other management positions. You get in at the ground level and work your way up... again, off your ability to do the job.
Unless your talking CEO type ****, in which case that's pretty much all on you to be an entrepreneur.
If you look at the most successful people in the modern world you can go at it two ways, money or politics (I sperate them becasue to be successful in politics you have to be popular and be able to rally people, where as to be wealthy you need other qualities).
The richest people on the planet (via working) are usually pretty ugly blokes, not pretty blondes with blue eyes and big tits. The most successful politicians (world leaders) are usually old not very attractive men or women.
I'm not saying that looks don't help, becasue ofc they do. But when it comes to doing a job that is important in some way, they don't give a **** if your pretty or not or have earrings.
But anyway I don't even have ****ing earrings so I'm bow out of this and let someone who does chat more about there experiences with this.
Post by: YoungMichael88 on Wed, 11 March 2015, 21:33:03
I have gauges. I have job.Ability is not something you can always gauge and frankly ability is over rated.
People without ability are always in positions of power.
Being good looking (with social skills and charm) and a average ability is much more useful than just being skilled.
Maybe if you've never worked before?
Or maybe you're just not high enough on the totem pole.
No, becasue once you start working in industry and you move jobs you get positions from or via recommendations or head hunted. This is where your ability to do the job far outshines any qualifications you have. It's why the blokes in the best positions are usually the worst qualified yet the most able, it's also why kids out of uni don't get those kinds of jobs.
That makes you a fixer not a leader
What are you even talking about, management?
From my experience management work up the ladder pretty much in house or are head hunted from other management positions. You get in at the ground level and work your way up... again, off your ability to do the job.
Unless your talking CEO type ****, in which case that's pretty much all on you to be an entrepreneur.
If you look at the most successful people in the modern world you can go at it two ways, money or politics (I sperate them becasue to be successful in politics you have to be popular and be able to rally people, where as to be wealthy you need other qualities).
The richest people on the planet (via working) are usually pretty ugly blokes, not pretty blondes with blue eyes and big tits. The most successful politicians (world leaders) are usually old not very attractive men or women.
I'm not saying that looks don't help, becasue ofc they do. But when it comes to doing a job that is important in some way, they don't give a **** if your pretty or not or have earrings.
But anyway I don't even have ****ing earrings so I'm bow out of this and let someone who does chat more about there experiences with this.
Post by: nubbinator on Wed, 11 March 2015, 21:36:33
I'm really not a fan of most gauges though.
Post by: paicrai on Thu, 12 March 2015, 11:04:13
I have government job.do you maintain clouds? i mean the *real* clouds