MS looks way better. Always will.
Hahaha.. Yea I used to think so too.. Until I finally understood "what was being done"..
SSAA is more realistic because it applies to the whole scene
MSAA can only work on edges..
Look here.. It's very hard to make out the MSAA words when it's small.
THe pictures are blown up, so you can read both, but when they're 1:1.. the SSAA is very readable, while you may have difficulties reading the MSAA
MSAA
Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/1dNX5BP.png)
SSAA
Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/GTzvzok.png)
I could potentially understand the argument for 3d games, but 2d SSAA looks gross.
MSAA for life.
I didn't expect this to turn into another Hurray THorpie style thread.. but, that's Geeklyfe for ya... Show Image
(http://textemoticons.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/073.gif)
But I would like ya'll to reconsider the merits of both AA methods..
SSAA simulates in the computer how a human eye would deal with images..
MSAA does the same thing, but only on "edges" and not the whole image.. Everything that's not an edge is aliased.
Purely in hearthstone I prefer MSAA, but I see the merits in both methods in reality.