I don't see any metion on the stepped caps lock, is it supported?Nice reminder! Yes, it is supported. I'll edit the OP.
Look very interesting.
Very nice. I'd be interested in seeing how the PCB looks like now that it supports all those layouts & switches :PLooks like swiss cheese. :D
I suspect you'll run afoul of the ALPS + multiple arrangements problems everyone else says happens. You can either support both switches, or multiple layouts, but both at once tends to step on each other and you can't keep discrete wires anymore.Thank you for the comment. And I understand your concern, that's why I said that ALPS is an upcoming feature: it isn't done yet and I may be forced to scrape it if I find the problems you said.
Having said that, if after shipping and with controller it could be around $50 I bet I'd be in for one. Still waiting for samwioski to come back and make a run of his 60% MX+Alps board though. I'd probably only get one or the other; too many keyboards and not enough malamutes to type on them.
For the record, will PCB-mounted MX-compatible switches be supported?Yes. :D
Perfect for you to test your universial plates I guess ;)Show Image(http://i.imgur.com/FhTyFvC.jpg)
Here is a picture of the VERY EARLY prototype i was very lucky to get my hands on.
Thanks Vinny, i really appericate this.
That's awesome. Probably as close as one can get to my pseudo-ergo staggered layout (http://i.imgur.com/1Sz0XrX.png).Interesting! What does the "ISO" key do?
I'll reduce the size of the smiley, it was indeed too big.Perfect for you to test your universial plates I guess ;)Show Image(http://i.imgur.com/FhTyFvC.jpg)
Here is a picture of the VERY EARLY prototype i was very lucky to get my hands on.
Thanks Vinny, i really appericate this.
Though, it looks like the bottom row is still missing some layout options.
I like the the silhouette of Rio de Janeiro. Nice touch! (but not the biggest fan of the smiley)
Will the switches be mounted upside down on the final version?Yes. That's something that the (now defunct?) task force of the rMK60 discussed about. Placing the switches this way seems to better align the LEDs with translucent legend keycaps. It also gives more space on some strategic places, like the neighborhood of the USB connector.
It sends scan code 86. I've mapped it to dead keys for accents on my custom keymap; the Neo layout uses it as a modifier for an extra layer;…That's awesome. Probably as close as one can get to my pseudo-ergo staggered layout (http://i.imgur.com/1Sz0XrX.png).Interesting! What does the "ISO" key do?
EDIT: My guess was wrong.That's awesome. Probably as close as one can get to my pseudo-ergo staggered layout (http://i.imgur.com/1Sz0XrX.png).Interesting! What does the "ISO" key do?
Will the switches be mounted upside down on the final version?Yes. That's something that the (now defunct?) task force of the rMK60 discussed about. Placing the switches this way seems to better align the LEDs with translucent legend keycaps. It also gives more space on some strategic places, like the neighborhood of the USB connector.
Will the switches be mounted upside down on the final version?Yes. That's something that the (now defunct?) task force of the rMK60 discussed about. Placing the switches this way seems to better align the LEDs with translucent legend keycaps. It also gives more space on some strategic places, like the neighborhood of the USB connector.
I know this might sound crazy, but any chance that you can support "standard" and upside down switch placement? As far as I'm aware, a good majority of enthusiasts don't use backlit keycaps and prefer the "underglow" effect of having the LEDs mounted on the bottom.
... Though your PCB will probably look even more like Swiss cheese :p
I know this might sound crazy, but any chance that you can support "standard" and upside down switch placement? As far as I'm aware, a good majority of enthusiasts don't use backlit keycaps and prefer the "underglow" effect of having the LEDs mounted on the bottom.
... Though your PCB will probably look even more like Swiss cheese :p
Holy **** haha. The board will have more empty space from the holes than there is actual PCB!
Maybe do what winkeyless does and you could offer a regular version and a R version as far as throughhole positioning goesI know this might sound crazy, but any chance that you can support "standard" and upside down switch placement? As far as I'm aware, a good majority of enthusiasts don't use backlit keycaps and prefer the "underglow" effect of having the LEDs mounted on the bottom.
... Though your PCB will probably look even more like Swiss cheese :p
I can try just to see if that is feasible. But...Holy **** haha. The board will have more empty space from the holes than there is actual PCB!
... and fab houses hates that. It could even affect the integrity of the board.
I'll understand if some people dislike one or more features of the board. Unfortunately I can't please everyone. No PCB is perfect, and this one isn't an exception.
Maybe do what winkeyless does and you could offer a regular version and a R version as far as throughhole positioning goesThat's interesting. I think I could do that, but the possible GBs would be only one version at a time.
Btw, will components like the processor, connector etc. already be soldered onto the PCB when you ship them out, or do we have to solder them to the board ourselves?You will have to solder just the switches.
the USB looks like surface mounted, pushing the usb-cable down might break it easily, is this the case?Yes, it is surface mounted. It's the same connector used on the GH60. I can change it for a through hole version.
the USB looks like surface mounted, pushing the usb-cable down might break it easily, is this the case?Yes, it is surface mounted. It's the same connector used on the GH60. I can change it for a through hole version.
Even from my limited experience, it would be much much much better, especially if the through-hole could be soldered too, it could become a new thingChanged the mini USB connector from SMD to through hole. I've found a connector that was almost an instant change: the physical profile is almost identical and just needed to make minor tracing corrections.
Otherwise even a small tap to the cable could easily break/dislodge the connector, and they do, with this knowledge, I would never buy a keyboard/pcb with surface mounted usb-connectors second-hand ever again :)
Will this project only cover 60% keyboards, or do you plan to extend it to other formats?Just 60% for now, as the Poker case is the de facto standard case. Other formats would need custom cases.
Seeing as some popular keycapsets (Retro, Granite) have included 3" Spacebars would it be possible for this pcb to have those?Very unlikely at this moment, I'm sorry. :-[
This is my current dream layout (http://www.keyboard-layout-editor.com/##@@_c=%23b81b24&a:7%3B&=ESC&_c=%23c4c8c5%3B&=1&=2&=3&=4&=5&=6&=7&=8&=9&=0&=%3F%0A+&=%60%0A%C2%B4&=%C2%B0&_c=%23909596%3B&=BSPC%3B&@_w:1.5%3B&=TAB&_c=%23c4c8c5%3B&=Q&=W&=E&=R&=T&=Y&=U&=I&=O&=P&_a:5%3B&=%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%C3%85&_a:7%3B&=%5E%0A%C2%A8%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%5E&_x:0.25&c=%230075ad&w:1.25&h:2&w2:1.5&h2:1&x2:-0.25%3B&=ENTER%3B&@_c=%23909596&w:1.75%3B&=CTRL&_c=%23cccccc%3B&=A&=S&=D&=F&=G&=H&=J&=K&=L&=%C3%96%0A%2F%3B%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%C3%96&=%C3%84%0A'&=*%0A'%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A*%3B&@_c=%23909596&w:1.25%3B&=SHIFT&_c=%23cccccc%3B&=%3E%0A%3C&=Z&=X&=C&=V&=B&=N&=M&=%2F%3B%0A,&=%2F:%0A.&_a:5%3B&=%2F_%0A-&_c=%23909596&a:7&w:1.75%3B&=SHIFT&=FN%203%3B&@_x:1.5%3B&=SUPER&_w:1.5%3B&=ALT&_w:1.5%3B&=FN%201&_w:3%3B&=&_w:1.5%3B&=FN%202&_w:1.5%3B&=ALT&=SUPER) that I was thinking of handwiring but with this pcb being so close I just had to ask:)
Seeing as some popular keycapsets (Retro, Granite) have included 3" Spacebars would it be possible for this pcb to have those?Very unlikely at this moment, I'm sorry. :-[
This is my current dream layout (http://www.keyboard-layout-editor.com/##@@_c=%23b81b24&a:7%3B&=ESC&_c=%23c4c8c5%3B&=1&=2&=3&=4&=5&=6&=7&=8&=9&=0&=%3F%0A+&=%60%0A%C2%B4&=%C2%B0&_c=%23909596%3B&=BSPC%3B&@_w:1.5%3B&=TAB&_c=%23c4c8c5%3B&=Q&=W&=E&=R&=T&=Y&=U&=I&=O&=P&_a:5%3B&=%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%C3%85&_a:7%3B&=%5E%0A%C2%A8%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%5E&_x:0.25&c=%230075ad&w:1.25&h:2&w2:1.5&h2:1&x2:-0.25%3B&=ENTER%3B&@_c=%23909596&w:1.75%3B&=CTRL&_c=%23cccccc%3B&=A&=S&=D&=F&=G&=H&=J&=K&=L&=%C3%96%0A%2F%3B%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A%C3%96&=%C3%84%0A'&=*%0A'%0A%0A%0A%0A%0A*%3B&@_c=%23909596&w:1.25%3B&=SHIFT&_c=%23cccccc%3B&=%3E%0A%3C&=Z&=X&=C&=V&=B&=N&=M&=%2F%3B%0A,&=%2F:%0A.&_a:5%3B&=%2F_%0A-&_c=%23909596&a:7&w:1.75%3B&=SHIFT&=FN%203%3B&@_x:1.5%3B&=SUPER&_w:1.5%3B&=ALT&_w:1.5%3B&=FN%201&_w:3%3B&=&_w:1.5%3B&=FN%202&_w:1.5%3B&=ALT&=SUPER) that I was thinking of handwiring but with this pcb being so close I just had to ask:)
Seems like you can order 2.75" 'Granite' space bars from signature plastics so I am still very interested in this:)2.75u is the measure of the ANSI right Shift key, so it is easy to obtain. 3u isn't used on ANSI or ISO, so you have to custom order it. That's why I didn't included it on the layout, as my goal was to make any layout possible using only standard keycaps.
Seems like you can order 2.75" 'Granite' space bars from signature plastics so I am still very interested in this:)2.75u is the measure of the ANSI right Shift key, so it is easy to obtain. 3u isn't used on ANSI or ISO, so you have to custom order it. That's why I didn't included it on the layout, as my goal was to make any layout possible using only standard keycaps.
Seems like you can order 2.75" 'Granite' space bars from signature plastics so I am still very interested in this:)2.75u is the measure of the ANSI right Shift key, so it is easy to obtain. 3u isn't used on ANSI or ISO, so you have to custom order it. That's why I didn't included it on the layout, as my goal was to make any layout possible using only standard keycaps.
Having that Shift Icon on the space would drive me crazy:p
Seems like you can order 2.75" 'Granite' space bars from signature plastics so I am still very interested in this:)2.75u is the measure of the ANSI right Shift key, so it is easy to obtain. 3u isn't used on ANSI or ISO, so you have to custom order it. That's why I didn't included it on the layout, as my goal was to make any layout possible using only standard keycaps.
I wanted to give full support to JIS layout
And that's why I said the bottom row gave me so much work. If 3u spacebars were more common/easily obtained, I would gladly use it. But they are not. PMK doesn't sell blanks of this size on their site, for example.Seems like you can order 2.75" 'Granite' space bars from signature plastics so I am still very interested in this:)2.75u is the measure of the ANSI right Shift key, so it is easy to obtain. 3u isn't used on ANSI or ISO, so you have to custom order it. That's why I didn't included it on the layout, as my goal was to make any layout possible using only standard keycaps.I wanted to give full support to JIS layout
3u spacebar tho :pShow Image(http://www.neotec.co.jp/etc/photo/compg8011802lpaja.jpg)
If you really need it, I'm sitting on about 750 3u Cherry JIS spacebar stabilizer wires.
I may be interested if this fits a poker case. Is this going to be arduino based?It will fit a Poker case, that is a main requisite of this PCB. It will be based on the ATmega32u4, but not on Arduino: I'll use TMK firmware for it.
I was waiting for LeandreN's plate to arrive, but it will take a while and I have another 4 PCBs anyway, so I built today the prototype AUNK:Wow, looks *awesome*
(Attachment Link)
And it was good that this is only a prototype, as I've found a mistake on the PCB. It still works, but need a hack to fit Cherry PCB stabilizers on ANSI layout, and that's unacceptable on the final version.
I also found a mistake on the basic TMK firmware I originally wrote, corrected that in 5 minutes. Now I need to learn how to program layers, and the different kinds of Fn activation.
And that Esc key was asking to be used on this board. :))
I was waiting for LeandreN's plate to arrive, but it will take a while and I have another 4 PCBs anyway, so I built today the prototype AUNK:Wow, looks *awesome*
(Attachment Link)
And it was good that this is only a prototype, as I've found a mistake on the PCB. It still works, but need a hack to fit Cherry PCB stabilizers on ANSI layout, and that's unacceptable on the final version.
I also found a mistake on the basic TMK firmware I originally wrote, corrected that in 5 minutes. Now I need to learn how to program layers, and the different kinds of Fn activation.
And that Esc key was asking to be used on this board. :))Hopefully I'll be using one in my custom build soon...
Don't lose your patience, go hand-wire your keyboard. This PCB is going to take a while before becoming reality, with all changes I now discovered I have to do.I was waiting for LeandreN's plate to arrive, but it will take a while and I have another 4 PCBs anyway, so I built today the prototype AUNK:Wow, looks *awesome*
(Attachment Link)
And it was good that this is only a prototype, as I've found a mistake on the PCB. It still works, but need a hack to fit Cherry PCB stabilizers on ANSI layout, and that's unacceptable on the final version.
I also found a mistake on the basic TMK firmware I originally wrote, corrected that in 5 minutes. Now I need to learn how to program layers, and the different kinds of Fn activation.
And that Esc key was asking to be used on this board. :))Hopefully I'll be using one in my custom build soon...
I already have the plate from LeandreN, now currently waiting to see if you will finalize this project before I loose patience and end up hand-wiring the keys.
Either way, very cool project, especially for us ISO users.
I really admire your transparency and dedication to perfection
Might re-build all my 60%'s when this PCB launches, the infinity PCB's make me paranoid, they have such teeny tiny SMD's - they have various quality issues, there are claims of out-of-boundary component usages / failures - worst of all the creators doesn't seem to address or investigate the issues, at least not with dedication (tho, other than some paranoid concerns, they are not that bad :)
I really admire your transparency and dedication to perfection
Might re-build all my 60%'s when this PCB launches, the infinity PCB's make me paranoid, they have such teeny tiny SMD's - they have various quality issues, there are claims of out-of-boundary component usages / failures - worst of all the creators doesn't seem to address or investigate the issues, at least not with dedication (tho, other than some paranoid concerns, they are not that bad :)
They said that they were going to use better QA on the current Infinity drop at MD. For that reason and the fact that there was enough communication from Massdrop regarding the diode issues, I don't agree with you. It's too soon to tell if the current drop will have problems but it seems that they are somewhat commited to avoid them this time around.
This PCB seems really a great idea, giving so many options to customize! The mini spacebar is super cute!Yeah, people here seems to not like the Awesome face so much. It will still be there, but in much smaller size. And if you look closely, you will see that I combined the Awesome face with the UN logo, so that counts as derivative work. :P
The only thing I'd change is the design - the awesome face isn't original content I guess...
But still, depending on price, I'd be in for a beta test!
The flexibility of this PCB seems to be truly amazing! :thumb:Not only that, but also I'm taking care to not place vias too close to those standoffs.
So of course I'm interested in trying it out ;)
EDIT: One thing you might want to be careful about is the "no components" places on the bottom side, where the "ribs"/standoffs of various cases touch the PCB. For instance I cannot use one of the chinese PCBs that I have (rs60) with an aluminium case that I have, because the alu case has slightly thicker "ribs" than the poker plastic case, so they touch one of diodes, which in turn screws up detecting keypresses (some keys fire the whole column).
Not only that, but also I'm taking care to not place vias too close to those standoffs.Cool! I guess you've got much more experience with these things as me, so please keep up the great work! :thumb:
The flexibility of this PCB seems to be truly amazing! :thumb:Not only that, but also I'm taking care to not place vias too close to those standoffs.
So of course I'm interested in trying it out ;)
EDIT: One thing you might want to be careful about is the "no components" places on the bottom side, where the "ribs"/standoffs of various cases touch the PCB. For instance I cannot use one of the chinese PCBs that I have (rs60) with an aluminium case that I have, because the alu case has slightly thicker "ribs" than the poker plastic case, so they touch one of diodes, which in turn screws up detecting keypresses (some keys fire the whole column).
I would like to see a split space bar as an option ...As I said before, I can't please everyone.
Is it possible for the PCB to support this layout?: http://www.keyboard-layout-editor.com/#/layouts/86b3cd92a54335cd46b00b90f9e0201a (It can also be used with the left Ctrl removed for a more appealing keyboard bottom row)I'll see what I can do.
I normally drill the PCB's to add the non-standard keycaps, but It seems tooo cancerous to do so, so I will probably try to convince PCB developers to support the layout from now on, or design a PCB myself to be developed at a small scale with MacroFab or something
I think the layout should gain a lot of traction in the future, as it uses standard keycaps to add arrows to an 60%
Is it possible for the PCB to support this layout?: http://www.keyboard-layout-editor.com/#/layouts/86b3cd92a54335cd46b00b90f9e0201a (It can also be used with the left Ctrl removed for a more appealing keyboard bottom row)Dedicated cursor arrow keys on a 60% keyboard? Ain't nobody got time fo dat.
I normally drill the PCB's to add the non-standard keycaps, but It seems tooo cancerous to do so, so I will probably try to convince PCB developers to support the layout from now on, or design a PCB myself to be developed at a small scale with MacroFab or something
I think the layout should gain a lot of traction in the future, as it uses standard keycaps to add arrows to an 60%
Is it possible for the PCB to support this layout?: http://www.keyboard-layout-editor.com/#/layouts/86b3cd92a54335cd46b00b90f9e0201a (It can also be used with the left Ctrl removed for a more appealing keyboard bottom row)Dedicated cursor arrow keys on a 60% keyboard? Ain't nobody got time fo dat.
I normally drill the PCB's to add the non-standard keycaps, but It seems tooo cancerous to do so, so I will probably try to convince PCB developers to support the layout from now on, or design a PCB myself to be developed at a small scale with MacroFab or something
I think the layout should gain a lot of traction in the future, as it uses standard keycaps to add arrows to an 60%
Seriously, though, learn to love the HHKB arrows.
Status update: I have withdrawn LED support from the AUNK. As a matter of fact, there are many other PCB's out there with a better support for them.
That means that I will never support LED's? No, it means I will not support them for now.
Right now I'm in process of debugging the TK78-R, so I'm not really working on the AUNK, but it seems that ALPS switches support can be done without much hassle. I will probably need to redo a few traces, but that's ok.
I'm in contact with a fab house that have built-in group buy support on their site. For a ~$50 board they require about 20 PCB's, so I think it is doable. Let me know if you guys are interested on a GB right now.
Does that mean there are no LEDs on the AUNK? Not even a caps lock indicator LED?A single LED for Caps Lock is doable, a full keyboard lighting isn't, at least for now. I need to do more tests to improve brightness without frying USB ports on the process. :-[
Does that mean there are no LEDs on the AUNK? Not even a caps lock indicator LED?A single LED for Caps Lock is doable, a full keyboard lighting isn't, at least for now. I need to do more tests to improve brightness without frying USB ports on the process. :-[
Will likely be in for at least one unless the CAD takes another huge dive.I fully understand you, Brazilian Real is falling down for months, and we also have a political crisis together with the economical one. :(
I will set the goal to 25 PCB's
I will set the goal to 25 PCB's
Do they do price tiers, like Massdrop? 25 sounds like a good base floor number, but I think we could hit 50, too. 35 for sure.
Do you have to pay anything to try? You could put it up at 50, and if that fails you can take it down and re-offer it at 30's price ...
So, like mass drop I'll need an account on their site?
Is it possible for the PCB to support this layout?: http://www.keyboard-layout-editor.com/#/layouts/86b3cd92a54335cd46b00b90f9e0201a (It can also be used with the left Ctrl removed for a more appealing keyboard bottom row)Dedicated cursor arrow keys on a 60% keyboard? Ain't nobody got time fo dat.
I normally drill the PCB's to add the non-standard keycaps, but It seems tooo cancerous to do so, so I will probably try to convince PCB developers to support the layout from now on, or design a PCB myself to be developed at a small scale with MacroFab or something
I think the layout should gain a lot of traction in the future, as it uses standard keycaps to add arrows to an 60%
Seriously, though, learn to love the HHKB arrows.
Arrows are the most used keys for me, it would be stupid for me to put them under a modifier, some people don't seem to use them much, in that case it makes some sense
It's either 60% with arrows or a TKL for me, I would rather have the 60% with arrows (and I do, and I love it)
Arrow keys and no pesky Caps Lock. Combine that with Alps support and I'll be a 60% convert!!! :cool:
Arrow keys and no pesky Caps Lock. Combine that with Alps support and I'll be a 60% convert!!! :cool:
You may want to check the OP about ALPS support. You probably won't like it. :(
Are there any of these available or will there be a group buy coming?There are 6 PCB's of revision 3.1, an early prototype run to validate my design. The revision 5.1, with all changes I needed to do and all proposed features, is finally completed. Problem is that I don't have the money right now to prototype it and I won't start a GB without this step.
It's in the OP and even name of the project: support for layouts, that are impossible with the other PCBs.
You could explain better the advantages of your offering over alternative PCBs; mainly, if its final price ends being at 50 or over, that means that it should be very well differentiated from the B-Face, Sprit's or even GON's that are well established, with proven quality and that have prices around fifty US dollars.If what you want is a "well established, with proven quality" PCB, then you better buy a B-Face, Sprit or GON PCB. And AFAIK, their prices are for the PCB alone, SMD component soldering costs extra.
…and there are people, who would like to get a keyboard with JIS layout or whatever resembles a split spacebarIt's in the OP and even name of the project: support for layouts, that are impossible with the other PCBs.By reading it, there is nothing, but the support for JIS layouts that I do not need, that makes me think it would be worth a try instead of a Nerd60 GON, for example. But it is a feedback intended for the OP author, he/she can just ignore it.