Some very nice mechanical keyboard love from the mainstream press!
Although the statement "IBM and Lexmark have long since abandoned the Model M" must be causing sad faces over at Unicomp.Well, at least they did mention Unicomp at the end of the review.
Hey now, I happen to love my Filco 104 tactile click. We're all here for the love of mechanical switches, whatever flavor we prefer, right?
5. Cherry Blue switches, aimed at beginners who are impressed by clicky sounds or non-beginning douchebags who want to impress people by pressing small leafs of metal while typing. It is a b-switch.
Got around to reading Webwit's post:Show Image(http://images4.cafepress.com/product/152229244v10_350x350_Front.jpg)
Bernays would have been proud
All in all a marketing trick aimed at uninformed people who like to show off how sophisticated they are by buying overpriced crap.
You could easily make similar cheap shots at the Datahand. Even more overpriced, fugly as hell, twice the size it needs to be, has its own inconsistent quirks. At least you can't accuse them of marketing tricks. Or any kind of marketing come to that.
It's all personal preference.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmYGpxuYpJQ
a Cherry switch is like a metal rubber dome. ... it will never be a true SWITCH, just a poor simulation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmYGpxuYpJQ
[...] irrelevant fud from amateur trolls :)
the BS seems to be a simulation and cost-cutting effort of the buckling leaf
People call me a troll, but cannot point out a single point where I am wrong. The rest is irrelevant fud from amateur trolls :)
People who complain that people should be allowed to have personal opinions on keyboards in response to someone who dared to have an opinion about a keyboard.......
the ability to discern and reject self-inconsistencies is a key ingredient of good taste :)
but people don't like to hear that applied to themselves! :p
Are people here complaining merely against webwit's right to have a personal opinion about a keyboard?
not me! :)
i just prefer hearing positivity directed toward people, 'cuz cynicism gets me down :D
Polyannas make me want to vomit. Don't be a polyanna. I want to hear a critical viewpoint. It doesn't get me down. I tend to learn something once in a while.
It is not that the BS is the final answer to all, as the BS seems to be a simulation and cost-cutting effort of the buckling leaf, which for starters consists of more elements and assembly.
you'd like to hear a prolonged, hyper-critical view of yourself?
No, but I'd like to hear the bad points of the keyboards I should avoid, before I waste money on something I won't like.
Incidentally, some people have said that the Model F has a better touch than the Model M. That may be, but it's subtle.
The real reason for capacitative keyboards is that multiple capacitors in series have a lower capacitance - so the signal from "ghost keys" is weaker. They may not have true N-key rollover, but they come close.
That is not a personal opinion, that is a fact.
Incidentally, some people have said that the Model F has a better touch than the Model M. That may be, but it's subtle.
I criticized a product, a company and the consumers of the product, with points which no one managed to counter. Oh and red necks just to make sure most of you were included :p (makes mental note of effect)
I did not attack or insult anyone personally ;) I grouped you neatly together. I criticized a product, a company and the consumers of the product, with points which no one managed to counter. Oh and red necks just to make sure most of you were included :p (makes mental note of effect)
P.S. You may refer to me as cheese head if it makes you feel better (what the Belgiums call us - they are to the Dutch what Canadians are to you)
I do not believe different typing experience between the IBM Model F keyboards (83 and 84 key) vs. the Model M keyboards can be described as subtle. Buckling spring over capacitive contacts vs. buckling spring over membrane does not result in the same effect...not even close.
I have several Model Fs and over a dozen Model Ms in my collection. My worst 84-key PC AT Model F keyboard knocks the socks off of my best Model M (a 1390120 from Jan 1986). Side by side typing makes the Model M feel heavy and dull in comparison to the Model F.
it would be nice to know what accounts for so much difference. this is only a guess, but maybe the model m's rubber sheet and the different hammer designs play significant parts.
I would love to find a Model M that felt anything like a Model F.
I do not believe different typing experience between the IBM Model F keyboards (83 and 84 key) vs. the Model M keyboards can be described as subtle.
one day, webwit, we'll find a worthy opponent for you
XD
I agree. The Model F is much better, and the best spring keyboard in existence (only counting key feel, not layout, form factor, etc.). Sandy agrees I think, and I'm a pure amateur compared to him. Never get a buckling leaf keyboard, makes you feel the same about the model F as you do now about the M (a great board if you aren't spoiled).
Wait...what's this thread about, again?
The Model F sounds great if you like nice switches in a archaic form factor and layout.Show Image(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=3071&stc=1&d=1247095102)
But I'm open minded. Somebody tell me when a NIB one comes along.
*mechanical breathing sounds*
oh! uhh.... hey! come on guys, we have to think up some brave and insane model f mods, to bring this classic up to date :)
edit: i created a model f group for us to join, so we can gang up on all the cost engineered buckling-springers ;)
http://geekhack.org/group.php?groupid=5
There is, of course, no fundamental technical reason why Unicomp couldn't make 104-key keyboards using Model F technology, but that would be very unlikely. For one thing, the Model F is significantly noisier than the Model M: I had forgotten that little detail about how you could actually hear the springs springing back on the older keyboards.
Hah! I've yet to see a successful Model F mod. You guys are too scared to open them up because the foam keeps oozing out.
Might want to start with Retrobrite. Watch out, 30 year old plastic will probably melt.
Hah! I've yet to see a successful Model F mod.
And they call Webwit a troll...
The noise is a reason why they should make them again. I think the comparative levels of over-engineering are reasons why they can't be made again.
Umm...the keys are already one-piece.
In my opinion Das Keyboard is Das Evil, and is some kind of cruel joke on wannabee geeks who buy a feeling and also a crap product.1. Fact.
Here is all that is wrong:
1. Das Name. This is an American company, that does not make keyboard but orders OEM keyboards in Taiwan, where they don't make switches, they order it from Cherry (German). Where they don't make switches either, they get it made in the Czech Republic. Don't ride the bandwagon of German craftsmanship if you're just some redneck douche bag company, please.
2. The controller bug issues..
3. It shines like it wants to poke my eye out and is some luxury object. It is just a piece of plastic.
4. Overpriced, you pay for the silly name.
5. Cherry Blue switches, aimed at beginners who are impressed by clicky sounds or non-beginning douchebags who want to impress people by pressing small leafs of metal while typing. It is a b-switch.
6. Claim of worlds best keyboard. See various points above. It is not.
7. Only mechanical keyboard picked up by the sites like wired, where a douchebag reviewer with no knowledge of keyboards will be impressed by clicky sounds.
All in all a marketing trick aimed at uninformed people who like to show off how sophisticated they are by buying overpriced crap. A bit like the Apple crowd. Bernays (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8953172273825999151#) would have been proud of both of them, these zealous students.
I'm in. I don't expect more than a handful of geekhackers will want to be associated with this dark subculture. Who needs em anyway?I have a model F in shipment. If it does turn out to be an AT I'll try to collect the opinions into a thread together with my own review.
(as I type this post on my Filco blue Cherry keyboard)
I guess you're planning on lumping the 83-key PC/XT diehards in with the 84-key PC AT fans. Technically, they both use Model F technology, but the 84-key was never referred to as a Model F by IBM.
Someone suggested that perhaps the membrane needed to be struck more forcefully than the capacitive plates did, which may suggest why the mechanism was changed around. As far as I can see, the spring is the only thing that can account for the difference between the two designs, and that theory is the one which explains why IBM would make the mechanism feel of lower quality when there was no apparent advantage in terms of things like cost reduction.This is hard to say. The main question is in which way their design goals changed between the design of the model F and M. Any statements below are based on speculation as I don't know all parameters of the design by heart.
And whatever Ripster may say, it's nothing to do with those godforsaken hammers...
I would love to find a Model M that felt anything like a Model F. Having used a Unicomp and Model F side by side for quite a while, they are quite different to eachother. Maybe the earlier Model Ms felt like Model Fs, but I have never used one that wasn't in a horribly worn out condition.[strike]As I stated above, I think it's in a combination of the hammers and springs.[/strike]
Either way, the difference between the Unicomp and the Model F was sufficient to make me think "Wow..." when I pressed a key on the Model F for the first time.
Just illustrates my hypothesis that Model F users don't have a sense of humor.
As I stated above, I think it's in a combination of the hammers and springs.
Sound sample here (http://geekhack.org/showwiki.php?title=Island:4769) for those curious about the sound. Warning - don't have sleeping babies nearby.
Any you're the same guys that complain about the Blue Cherry sound?!?!?Show Image(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=4992&stc=1&d=1254681124)
*facepalm* Seriously folks, many people have carried out experiments that effectively rule out the hammer hitting the plate as the source of noise or tactility. I think it's time you moved on.Could be, but then I don't know if anyone actually knows the "exact" cause.
The noise is a reason why they should make them again. I think the comparative levels of over-engineering are reasons why they can't be made again. You could probably buy a Filco with the amount of money it would cost to manufacture one, even in mass production.
And they call Webwit a troll...
many people have carried out experiments that effectively rule out the hammer hitting the plate as the source of noise or tactility
I seriously doubt that keyboards using Model F technology (buckling spring over capacitive contact key switches) will ever be mass produced again. Most people simply don't care that much about keyboards and the market demand would not generate enough volume to enable the profit margins required by the current manufacturers of high end botique keyboards.
That what you call echo is actually reverb (after all, you don't hear "ping, ping, ping..."). It is nearly impossible to remove this sound without coating the spring in grease or some other viscous fluid. While dampening the hammer's movement alters the sound, it will probably wont' change the sound of the spring slapping the key well.
If you want to know more about the mechanics, look at spring reverb units (http://www.accutronicsreverb.com/rvbtheop.htm) used in audio effect banks.
ah, but as hobbyists all we gotta do is break even :)
we may have a shortage of capital and manufacturing might, but we do have an abundance of insight, and nobody is drawing a salary.
Y'all know I personally believe that the feel of the keypresses were perfected with the 84-key PC AT keyboard.
I could do with a description of one, and preferably a board that has them =P
Ask Clickclack where he got his keyboards. After all, most of them lack the cable but could still be used for parts.
Meanwhile - At The Blue Cherry Club!
Ehr, it is already NKRO.
Hear, hear, finally someone who knows what this is all about ;)
Although I don't want to scare the OP. To put things into perspective, any Cherry board is miles better than any Logitech board. A Logitech is a cheap Chinese car, a Cherry a Mercedes middle class, and we're just some nuts, like mentioned above, discussing the best car money could buy, which is not economically realistic.
rumor has it clickclack is hiding 19 cargo containers full of model Fs ;D
I wouldn't describe the Model F technology as overengineering. It was the dominant tecnology used for terminal keyboards and early personal computer keyboards when systems were sold as a bundle. Y'all know I personally believe that the feel of the keypresses were perfected with the 84-key PC AT keyboard. It's too bad that the Model F technology never made it to the 101 key layout. Model Ms were the result of IBM's brilliant challenge to it's engineers to replicate the buckling spring technology with a keyboard that cost less to mass produce.
Bernays (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8953172273825999151#) would have been proud of both of them, these zealous students.
Lesseeee: Welly underwear review or Huha "critique sandwich" reviews. Which one would a manufacturer prefer?
Why do we have so many ways to mutilate keyboards?
someone buy the model S to see if the scanrate issues are fixed. Then return it FA FRAY.
on the das keyboard web site, they don't actually mention anything about a newer version of the das.
Why do you guys make keyboards so sensual?
Rule 34. (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rule%2034)