Y'all make it really hard to keep up with the drama while I'm away from the forum. :-/
Can we go just a little while where we all get along?
Thank you for deleting my posts, we would never want to expose a vendor (I mean group of volunteers). :)post here, i'll protect you under the ******* umbrella.
Just keeping people accountable, please don't get upset.
Thank you for deleting my posts, we would never want to expose a vendor (I mean group of volunteers). :)post here, i'll protect you under the ******* umbrella.
Just keeping people accountable, please don't get upset.
REPORTED - DIRECT ATTACK!!send that honey back then. it was from the owner's private stash, you don't deserve it.
REPORTED - DIRECT ATTACK!!send that honey back then. it was from the owner's private stash, you don't deserve it.
step up or step off unc'
Also if it was in their sub, mods didn't do it. They did.
Guys, can't we just love one another?
(https://drawception.com/pub/panels/2012/11-8/mnXaesFgrG-8.png)Guys, can't we just love one another?
AINT LOVE NO HO SON
Also if it was in their sub, mods didn't do it. They did.
^ This.
I mean, if you think it's cool to talk **** about someone in their own sub, and they not do something about it, you might be delusional.
By the way, how many butt-hurt whiny twat threads do you want to make about it? You need to try harder with your wannabe demik persona.
You're not clever, funny or interesting enough to be demik. So try to locate your own personality, if possible.
Also if it was in their sub, mods didn't do it. They did.
^ This.
I mean, if you think it's cool to talk **** about someone in their own sub, and they not do something about it, you might be delusional.
By the way, how many butt-hurt whiny twat threads do you want to make about it? You need to try harder with your wannabe demik persona.
You're not clever, funny or interesting enough to be demik. So try to locate your own personality, if possible.
If Demik's persona is to call out bull****, then yes, I agree.
Anything else you mad about kid?
Shouldn't you be in Slack with your boyfriend? Does he know you're posting here??
when losing an argument, resort to inferring that the opposing party is 'mad'.
when losing an argument, resort to inferring that the opposing party is 'mad'.
We're arguing?
when losing an argument, resort to inferring that the opposing party is 'mad'.
We're arguing?
you're so bad at this, you don't even make it fun.
I mean, if you think it's cool to talk **** about someone in their own sub, and they not do something about it, you might be delusional.I think that's perfectly cool. I know I certainly wouldn't delete/edit any comments in any sub that I had control over, even if negative things were being said about me or an organisation I was involved with.
I mean, if you think it's cool to talk **** about someone in their own sub, and they not do something about it, you might be delusional.I think that's perfectly cool. I know I certainly wouldn't delete/edit any comments in any sub that I had control over, even if negative things were being said about me or an organisation I was involved with.
Know that by deleting statements you give them validity, whereas if you were to ignore them or rebut them you would not be doing so. Also, I know that I have far more confidence in people/entities that don't feel the need to delete and edit things.
I'm really surprised by you saying this actually. I would have thought that you'd understand the importance of criticism and the problems that immunity from criticism brings to every party.
I mean, if you think it's cool to talk **** about someone in their own sub, and they not do something about it, you might be delusional.I think that's perfectly cool. I know I certainly wouldn't delete/edit any comments in any sub that I had control over, even if negative things were being said about me or an organisation I was involved with.
Know that by deleting statements you give them validity, whereas if you were to ignore them or rebut them you would not be doing so. Also, I know that I have far more confidence in people/entities that don't feel the need to delete and edit things.
I'm really surprised by you saying this actually. I would have thought that you'd understand the importance of criticism and the problems that immunity from criticism brings to every party.
The posts he's referring to are things like people being called a ****flap and people being told to **** off
The posts he's referring to are things like people being called a ****flap and people being told to **** off
I mean, if you think it's cool to talk **** about someone in their own sub, and they not do something about it, you might be delusional.I think that's perfectly cool. I know I certainly wouldn't delete/edit any comments in any sub that I had control over, even if negative things were being said about me or an organisation I was involved with.
Know that by deleting statements you give them validity, whereas if you were to ignore them or rebut them you would not be doing so. Also, I know that I have far more confidence in people/entities that don't feel the need to delete and edit things.
I'm really surprised by you saying this actually. I would have thought that you'd understand the importance of criticism and the problems that immunity from criticism brings to every party.
quick!
someone kiss me
:-*
It depends on the content of the post - wherein digi's posts weren't stating anything factual, just his displeasure with people joining slack, to the point of bringing it into a thread that he had no business bringing it into.I didn't get the impression that your statement was in response to a particular situation, and it didn't help I had no prior knowledge of what digi posted or what happened. I took it as a blanket statement pertaining to any/all negative/insulting comments being posted in your sub, and I responded to it as if it were such a statement.
So a statement of 'take all of your reddit plebs with you to slack and make GH great again' is a valid argument that should be kept? Please, think about what you are arguing about before bringing it to the table.
It depends on the content of the post - wherein digi's posts weren't stating anything factual, just his displeasure with people joining slack, to the point of bringing it into a thread that he had no business bringing it into.I didn't get the impression that your statement was in response to a particular situation, and it didn't help I had no prior knowledge of what digi posted or what happened. I took it as a blanket statement pertaining to any/all negative/insulting comments being posted in your sub, and I responded to it as if it were such a statement.
So a statement of 'take all of your reddit plebs with you to slack and make GH great again' is a valid argument that should be kept? Please, think about what you are arguing about before bringing it to the table.
GOD DAMN IT ITS demik NOT Demik or DEMICK or Demick.
A LITTLE RESPECT PLS
GOD DAMN IT ITS demik NOT Demik or DEMICK or Demick.
A LITTLE RESPECT PLS
GOD DAMN IT ITS demik NOT Demik or DEMICK or Demick.(http://puu.sh/nSvcN/16d70d73d6.jpg)
A LITTLE RESPECT PLS
y'all need some logic
y'all need some logicBoolean logic
GOD DAMN IT ITS demik NOT Demik or DEMICK or Demick.
A LITTLE RESPECT PLSShow Image(http://puu.sh/nSvcN/16d70d73d6.jpg)