I just posted a similar thread about building a 60% board too lol. What requirements do you need for your board? For me the 2 main features I wanted were backlighting and programmable layers and so far I've gone with the Gh60 Satan as the official Satan doesn't support backlighting.
I just posted a similar thread about building a 60% board too lol. What requirements do you need for your board? For me the 2 main features I wanted were backlighting and programmable layers and so far I've gone with the Gh60 Satan as the official Satan doesn't support backlighting.
I dont need backlit keys, i just would like the underneath and sides of the PCB to glow, and i just ordered zealio switches for it but yea! and where did you order the GH60?
Why didnt you choose the NerD or the FaceW?
I just posted a similar thread about building a 60% board too lol. What requirements do you need for your board? For me the 2 main features I wanted were backlighting and programmable layers and so far I've gone with the Gh60 Satan as the official Satan doesn't support backlighting.
I dont need backlit keys, i just would like the underneath and sides of the PCB to glow, and i just ordered zealio switches for it but yea! and where did you order the GH60?
Why didnt you choose the NerD or the FaceW?
I ordered a Satan Gh60 off aliexpress. The main reason I got the Satan is the price, I ordered the pcb with diodes and resistors already soldered, 70 cherry red switches, 70 LEDs, stabilisers and the plate for $88 shipped to me from aliexpress. The FaceW and NerD pcbs are about $55-60 on their own, add the cost of the plate, switches and everything else they will be way over $88! Them 2 pcbs are probably better quality but for my first build I don't plan on spending a lot and I'm sure the Satan pcb will be just fine for my needs. Oh and apparently they don't do some led customisation I need where the Satan can. Will see how it turns out.
I really would have liked an 'official' GH60 but it lacks full backlighting without some extras AND the fact that it was green as well lol. But if you are using a plate I guess you can't really see the green pcb.
The official GH60 was developed years ago so at the time it had the features people wanted. The official group buy stalled for a long time and is currently in recovery mode.I really would have liked an 'official' GH60 but it lacks full backlighting without some extras AND the fact that it was green as well lol. But if you are using a plate I guess you can't really see the green pcb.
Why did the official gh60 stop? Also is programming on it easy?
As a crazy 60% guy I can say that I have tested almost all 60% PCB's (except for the insane expensive 356 and KMAC , and Duck Viper/Eagle) . I use keyboards as tools so stability and compatibility with any operating system, BIOS etc... is very important, also build quality, fluff comes on the last place.
So my top is:
1. NerD60 - great hardware, original firmware is quite buggy for my taste but you can convert it to TMK and that makes it the best 60% ever, you have also backlight and underlight.
2. GH60 (the original not Satan clones) - the PCB's from the original GB are OK'ish, decent hardware quality. Runs TMK, Easy AVR, easy to program, good stability, great tool :) The PCB's from techkeys.us are way better from the quality point of view, I like them a lot! No fluff for GH60, if you want LED's this is not the board :) You can put just a few (WASD, Esc, Caps, Fn)
3. faceW - very good hardware, backlight support, can be programmed with just a text editor, you have also a GUI but I hate it. The keyboard ia pretty much useless under BIOS.
4. winkeyless.kr boards (B.face, X2 and co) - very good hardware, only GUI for programming and only from Windows or Mac (if you use Linux you are dead), backlight, underlight, rgb in word fluff :P same problems in BIOS as faceW. It's on 4th place because faceW can be programmed on any OS with just a text editor.
No, I have never worked on a Satan PCB. I don't care about LED's so I'd rather get a GH60 :)People always say GON PCBs are exceedingly good quality, does it deserve its status in your opinion?
I have 3 of them so I'd say : Yes!No, I have never worked on a Satan PCB. I don't care about LED's so I'd rather get a GH60 :)People always say GON PCBs are exceedingly good quality, does it deserve its status in your opinion?
@MOZ that's what I'm confused about too, hence my question above.
I smell BS with this quality thing.
Alu slaps are like monuments.Yeah aluminium slaps take all the fun out of everything.
Monument, reminds me, we are yet to see a ceramic/marble/glass keyboard case, right?I've seen marble wrist supports and discussions on glass keycaps but that is about it.
KC60 is another low-end PCB, not saying it's bad, it will do the job and it's OK for a first project. I would take an original GH60, but that's me.What's the difference between the two? The GH60 is better quality? I thought the GH60 was better for backlighting and RGB and it can do ISO. But that the KC60 could do all that too except the ISO.
PCB | Backlighting | Firmware | Underglow | ISO | Right shift options | RoHS |
B.face (Winkeyless) | Single colour | ps2avrU | 1 colour top, RGB bottom | Yes | 2.75, 1.75-1 | |
B.face X2 (Winkeyless) | Single colour | ps2avrU | RGB top & bottom | Yes | 2.75, 1.75-1 | |
FaceW (Sprit) | Single colour | ps2avrU | Yes (unknown) | Yes | 2.75, 1.75-1 | |
GH60 (GB) | Not yet | EasyAVR / TMK | No | Yes | 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 | Yes |
GH60 (Techkeys) | Not yet | EasyAVR / TMK | No | Yes | 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 | Yes |
GH60 Satan | Single colour | EasyAVR / TMK | No | Yes | 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 | Yes |
KC60 | Single colour | EasyAVR / TMK | No | No | 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 | |
NerD60 ver2.0 (Gon) | Single colour | NerDy GUI | Single colour on sides | Yes | 2.75, 1.75-1 |
Since there's good discussion going on here I think a comparison table would be good - corrections, blank fills and missing PCBs appreciated. Might make a good sticky?
PCB Backlighting Firmware Underglow ISO Right shift options RoHS B.face (Winkeyless) Single colour ps2avrU 1 colour top, RGB bottom Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 B.face (Winkeyless) Single colour ps2avrU RGB top & bottom Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 FaceW (Sprit) Single colour ps2avrU Yes (unknown) Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 GH60 (GB) Not yet EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes GH60 (Techkeys) Not yet EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes GH60 Satan Single colour EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes KC60 Single colour EasyAVR / TMK No No 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 NerD60 ver2.0 (Gon) Single colour NerDy GUI Single colour on sides Yes 2.75, 1.75-1
Since there's good discussion going on here I think a comparison table would be good - corrections, blank fills and missing PCBs appreciated. Might make a good sticky?
PCB Backlighting Firmware Underglow ISO Right shift options RoHS B.face (Winkeyless) Single colour ps2avrU 1 colour top, RGB bottom Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 B.face (Winkeyless) Single colour ps2avrU RGB top & bottom Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 FaceW (Sprit) Single colour ps2avrU Yes (unknown) Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 GH60 (GB) Not yet EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes GH60 (Techkeys) Not yet EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes GH60 Satan Single colour EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes KC60 Single colour EasyAVR / TMK No No 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 NerD60 ver2.0 (Gon) Single colour NerDy GUI Single colour on sides Yes 2.75, 1.75-1
maybe change Right shift options to supported layouts to cover some other distinctions, I would do it just don't know how to do the fancy tables and have a legend, i.e. WKL - 1.5-1-1.5 bottom row, HHKB - split r-shift + 2x1u backspace, STP - stepped caps lock support
Nice! Anywhere TMK can go EasyAVR can, they will have to be italic or something though - if you need this list you probably shouldn't be playing with the bootloader...Yep, that is true :)) If you don't have experience with these kind of things you can break your board, in reality it is little you can do to make an atmega32u4 unusable but if you are inexperienced you will have a hard time to bring it back to life.
I don't think the original GH60 has support for that layout https://geekhack.org/?topic=34959.0 .
Now that I see it it's very interesting.
For BIOS support you don't have to worry, it works. I have it with TMK and no problems
Why don't you comvert your NerD to TMK? I did that on 3 boards and never regreted it a moment.I don't think the original GH60 has support for that layout https://geekhack.org/?topic=34959.0 .
Now that I see it it's very interesting.
For BIOS support you don't have to worry, it works. I have it with TMK and no problems
I am totally positive about the support for ISO, splitted right shift in 1+1.75, central 7u space bar with 1.5u mods at both sides; but, the only part I am not that sure is the two 1.25u mods at each side; however, that is an standard distribution of modifiers, therefore it is very likely that can be fit. I will try it with my GON this weekend, I suppose the arrangement at the bottom is pretty close to the GH60, but the Nerd60 has some issues with my BIOS.
I don't think the original GH60 has support for that layout https://geekhack.org/?topic=34959.0 .
Now that I see it it's very interesting.
For BIOS support you don't have to worry, it works. I have it with TMK and no problems
I don't think the original GH60 has support for that layout https://geekhack.org/?topic=34959.0 .
Now that I see it it's very interesting.
For BIOS support you don't have to worry, it works. I have it with TMK and no problems
GH60 should support that layout -- it uses the two outermost key positions from the 1.25-1.25-1.25-6.25-1.25-1.25-1.25-1.25 bottom row, and the innermost key positions from the 1.5-1-1.5-7-1.5-1-1.5 bottom row. 1.5-1 takes up the same physical space as 1.25-1.25, and I believe the logical key positions of the two outermost modifiers are the same regardless of which of those two configurations is used. It's not common, so it's not listed explicitly, but I don't see why it wouldn't work.
I don't think the original GH60 has support for that layout https://geekhack.org/?topic=34959.0 .
Now that I see it it's very interesting.
For BIOS support you don't have to worry, it works. I have it with TMK and no problems
GH60 should support that layout -- it uses the two outermost key positions from the 1.25-1.25-1.25-6.25-1.25-1.25-1.25-1.25 bottom row, and the innermost key positions from the 1.5-1-1.5-7-1.5-1-1.5 bottom row. 1.5-1 takes up the same physical space as 1.25-1.25, and I believe the logical key positions of the two outermost modifiers are the same regardless of which of those two configurations is used. It's not common, so it's not listed explicitly, but I don't see why it wouldn't work.
I will give it a try with a GH60 from techkeys, I do not need backlighting and I want my board to be fully compatible with my BIOS, so I will explore that option. One last question: Does the GH60 have support for in switch LEDs? I may want at least the Caps Lock.
I don't think the original GH60 has support for that layout https://geekhack.org/?topic=34959.0 .
Now that I see it it's very interesting.
For BIOS support you don't have to worry, it works. I have it with TMK and no problems
GH60 should support that layout -- it uses the two outermost key positions from the 1.25-1.25-1.25-6.25-1.25-1.25-1.25-1.25 bottom row, and the innermost key positions from the 1.5-1-1.5-7-1.5-1-1.5 bottom row. 1.5-1 takes up the same physical space as 1.25-1.25, and I believe the logical key positions of the two outermost modifiers are the same regardless of which of those two configurations is used. It's not common, so it's not listed explicitly, but I don't see why it wouldn't work.
I will give it a try with a GH60 from techkeys, I do not need backlighting and I want my board to be fully compatible with my BIOS, so I will explore that option. One last question: Does the GH60 have support for in switch LEDs? I may want at least the Caps Lock.
It has pads for LEDs. I'm not sure exactly how they are wired up, but if you only want caps lock it should be possible to make things work. I'd need to take a look at the electrical layout of the board to be certain though.
I don't think the original GH60 has support for that layout https://geekhack.org/?topic=34959.0 .
Now that I see it it's very interesting.
For BIOS support you don't have to worry, it works. I have it with TMK and no problems
GH60 should support that layout -- it uses the two outermost key positions from the 1.25-1.25-1.25-6.25-1.25-1.25-1.25-1.25 bottom row, and the innermost key positions from the 1.5-1-1.5-7-1.5-1-1.5 bottom row. 1.5-1 takes up the same physical space as 1.25-1.25, and I believe the logical key positions of the two outermost modifiers are the same regardless of which of those two configurations is used. It's not common, so it's not listed explicitly, but I don't see why it wouldn't work.
I will give it a try with a GH60 from techkeys, I do not need backlighting and I want my board to be fully compatible with my BIOS, so I will explore that option. One last question: Does the GH60 have support for in switch LEDs? I may want at least the Caps Lock.
It has pads for LEDs. I'm not sure exactly how they are wired up, but if you only want caps lock it should be possible to make things work. I'd need to take a look at the electrical layout of the board to be certain though.
Thank you, your feedback is well appreciated.
Since there's good discussion going on here I think a comparison table would be good - corrections, blank fills and missing PCBs appreciated. Might make a good sticky?
PCB Backlighting Firmware Underglow ISO Right shift options RoHS B.face (Winkeyless) Single colour ps2avrU 1 colour top, RGB bottom Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 B.face X2 (Winkeyless) Single colour ps2avrU RGB top & bottom Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 FaceW (Sprit) Single colour ps2avrU Yes (unknown) Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 GH60 (GB) Not yet EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes GH60 (Techkeys) Not yet EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes GH60 Satan Single colour EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes KC60 Single colour EasyAVR / TMK No No 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 NerD60 ver2.0 (Gon) Single colour NerDy GUI Single colour on sides Yes 2.75, 1.75-1
It is really hard for me to understand why under lighting could be that important for some, what is the functionality of lighting in a board? besides some visual clues for lock functions?
Since there's good discussion going on here I think a comparison table would be good - corrections, blank fills and missing PCBs appreciated. Might make a good sticky?
PCB Backlighting Firmware Underglow ISO Right shift options RoHS B.face (Winkeyless) Single colour ps2avrU 1 colour top, RGB bottom Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 B.face X2 (Winkeyless) Single colour ps2avrU RGB top & bottom Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 FaceW (Sprit) Single colour ps2avrU Yes (unknown) Yes 2.75, 1.75-1 GH60 (GB) Not yet EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes GH60 (Techkeys) Not yet EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes GH60 Satan Single colour EasyAVR / TMK No Yes 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 Yes KC60 Single colour EasyAVR / TMK No No 2.75, 1.75-1, 1-1.75 NerD60 ver2.0 (Gon) Single colour NerDy GUI Single colour on sides Yes 2.75, 1.75-1
QMK supports underglow on KC60:
https://github.com/jackhumbert/qmk_firmware
It is really hard for me to understand why under lighting could be that important for some, what is the functionality of lighting in a board? besides some visual clues for lock functions?Show Image(http://i.imgur.com/vRCblg5.jpg)
Where does the zeal60 pcb fit in this picture?
Where does the zeal60 pcb fit in this picture?
Premium quality pcb, fully programmable with QMK, is only PCB with per-switch RGB LED's at the moment*, ISO compatible,Split backspace compatible, Short R-Shift compatible.
Not sure if it has underglow rgb as well.
*There is some taobao PCBs with RGB per switch but they are not fully programmable and there is lots of unknowns about them at the moment which is why I say this
All based on the end users opinion I guess.Where does the zeal60 pcb fit in this picture?
Premium quality pcb, fully programmable with QMK, is only PCB with per-switch RGB LED's at the moment*, ISO compatible,Split backspace compatible, Short R-Shift compatible.
Not sure if it has underglow rgb as well.
*There is some taobao PCBs with RGB per switch but they are not fully programmable and there is lots of unknowns about them at the moment which is why I say this
Does the support for per-switch RGB LEDs worth doubling the price for an sixty PCB?
All based on the end users opinion I guess.Where does the zeal60 pcb fit in this picture?
Premium quality pcb, fully programmable with QMK, is only PCB with per-switch RGB LED's at the moment*, ISO compatible,Split backspace compatible, Short R-Shift compatible.
Not sure if it has underglow rgb as well.
*There is some taobao PCBs with RGB per switch but they are not fully programmable and there is lots of unknowns about them at the moment which is why I say this
Does the support for per-switch RGB LEDs worth doubling the price for an sixty PCB?
As someone who doesn't really care for rgb that much I wouldn't be able to justify it, but for some I get it.
Also have to keep in mind it's the first 60 with this feature, anything with new tech in it always has a markup like that associated with it.